Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
|
|
- Annabella Gray
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Matthew Strugar, SBN matthew-s@petaf.org PETA Foundation W. Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: -- Fax: David Loy, SBN davidloy@aclusandiego.org Sean Riordan, SBN sriordan@aclusandiego.org ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties P.O. Box San Diego, CA Tel: -- Fax: --00 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. San Diego County Regional Airport Authority and JCDecaux North America, Defendants. Case No.: 'CV0 CAB RBB Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
2 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Plaintiff People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. ( PETA ), by and through its undersigned counsel, brings this Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority ( Airport Authority ) and JCDecaux North America ( JCDecaux ) to protect its rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and their analogs in the California Constitution. Plaintiff alleges upon knowledge as to its own conduct and observations and upon information and belief as to the conduct of others: Nature of the Action. This civil rights action arises out of the unconstitutional refusal of the Airport Authority and its agent, JCDecaux, to accept advertising at San Diego International Airport ( SAN or the Airport ) from Plaintiff because of the message expressed in the proposed advertisement.. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that Defendants violated its constitutional rights as set forth in this Complaint; a declaration that Defendants actions violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article, Sections and of the California Constitution as set forth in this Complaint; and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief ordering Defendants to accept and display Plaintiff s advertisement on terms no less favorable than those given to other nonprofit advertisers. Plaintiff also seeks an award of reasonable costs of litigation, including attorneys fees and expenses, pursuant to U.S.C. and other applicable law. Parties. Plaintiff PETA is a Virginia non-stock corporation and animal protection charity exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 0(c)() of the Internal Revenue Code. A central tenet of PETA s mission is to expose cruelty to animals used for entertainment, educate the public about such cruelty, and
3 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 encourage people to oppose such cruelty, including at SeaWorld in San Diego, California.. Defendant Airport Authority is the County agency that manages the operation of SAN.. Defendant JCDecaux is a Delaware corporation doing business in California. JCDecaux manages the advertising space at SAN under a contract with the Airport Authority. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. and as this is an action to redress the deprivation, under color of state law, of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff s state constitutional claims pursuant to U.S.C.. Plaintiff seeks remedies under U.S.C. and (protection of constitutional rights), Fed R. Civ. P. (injunctive relief), and U.S.C. 0 and 0 and Fed. R. Civ. P. (declaratory relief).. Venue is proper under U.S.C. because the Defendants acts in violation of the United States Constitution have arisen and continue to arise in the Southern District of California. Facts Giving Rise to Plaintiff s Claims. At all times relevant to the matters set forth in this Complaint, Defendant Airport Authority had and currently has in place a written policy concerning the acceptance of advertising to run at the Airport (hereinafter, the Advertising Policy ). The Advertising Policy was and is, in full: () Advertising contracts shall be negotiated for the purpose of increasing airport revenues. () Advertising displays shall be in good taste, non-controversial, and maintained in such a manner as not to interfere with ordinary Airport operations, and to be as informational as possible.
4 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Since its inception, Plaintiff has championed ending the use of animals for human amusement, including the use of marine mammals in aquaticthemed amusement parks. As part of its public awareness and education campaigns, Plaintiff prepared an advertisement encouraging the public to avoid SeaWorld, the captive-animal aquatic-themed amusement park with several locations throughout the country, including in San Diego. Plaintiff chose SAN as the site for this advertisement to counteract the abundance of advertising traditionally promoting SeaWorld San Diego throughout the Airport.. Plaintiff seeks to run the following advertisement ( the Advertisement ) at SAN:. Defendant JCDecaux serves as the advertising agent for SAN pursuant to a contract with the Airport Authority. Pursuant to this contract, the Airport reserves the right to prohibit the display of alcohol and tobacco advertising. The contract also requires JCDecaux to provide the Airport with each proposed advertising contract and advertising copy, with the Airport retaining absolute and sole discretion to reject any proposed advertisement. The contract provides the Airport with the right to compel the removal of any advertisement and limits
5 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JCDecaux s right to object, on constitutional grounds or otherwise, to such a removal.. On January, 0, Plaintiff contacted JCDecaux seeking to run the Advertisement.. That same day, Steve MacKelvie, Vice President of Airport Properties for JCDeceaux, informed Plaintiff that it would not accept the proposed advertisement as it does not conform to [JCDecaux s] internal policies on advertising.. When Plaintiff inquired about the basis of the alleged nonconformity, MacKelvie directed Plaintiff to Martha Bailey, Executive Vice President of Legal Affairs and General Counsel for JCDecaux.. On January, 0, Plaintiff wrote Bailey to inquire about the basis for JCDecaux rejecting the proposed advertisement. Bailey, on behalf of Defendant JCDecaux, responded that JCDecaux North America makes its decisions on content based on internal guidelines and policies.. Plaintiff responded that it wished to know which of [JCDecaux s] specific guidelines [PETA s] ad violates and asked for a copy of those guidelines or policies. Bailey responded stating, I am sorry but these are our internal guidelines/policies.. On January 0, 0, Plaintiff s counsel wrote to Bailey and Defendant Airport Authority CEO Thella Bowens stating that their refusal to run Plaintiff s advertising was unconstitutional. The letter requested that Defendants accept the Advertisement and respond to Plaintiff s counsel to that effect by February, 0.. On February, 0, Bailey responded to Plaintiff s counsel s letter, maintaining Defendants refusal to run Plaintiff s Advertisement or to disclose Defendants advertising criteria to Plaintiff. Bailey informed Plaintiff that the
6 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 advertisement violated inter alia JCDeacux s internal, non-public policy against advertisements that are disparaging or demeaning.. Defendants refusal to accept Plaintiff s Advertisement is in stark contrast to Defendants acceptance of advertisements promoting SeaWorld and of other issue-oriented, educational, and advocacy advertisements displayed at SAN. For example, SAN consistently accepts and displays digital advertisements, posters, and wall-wrap advertisements promoting SeaWorld. In addition, Defendants accept issue-oriented advertisements from, among others, Earth Justice, Oxfam, the World Wildlife Fund, the Nature Conservancy, the Girl Scouts, the Make a Wish Foundation, and the Rotary Club. 0. Defendants have applied a system of prior restraint to refuse Plaintiff s proposed advertisement on the bases of its content and/or viewpoint that does not include constitutionally adequate standards.. Plaintiff is suffering an ongoing irreparable injury to its rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United Constitution and Article I, Sections and of the California Constitution. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendants acted under color of state law, and JCDecaux has acted in concert with Defendant Airport Authority in the maintenance and application of restrictions on advertising at SAN. First Cause of Action Infringement of Freedom of Speech First and Fourteenth Amendments ( U.S.C. ). Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.. Defendants refusal to run Plaintiff s Advertisement has restricted and continues to restrict Plaintiff s ability to convey its political message to the public and to participate in a debate on a matter of public concern. Defendants actions
7 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as made applicable to state entities through the Fourteenth Amendment.. Defendants refusal to run Plaintiff s anti-seaworld Advertisement while accepting and displaying pro-seaworld advertising, as well as similar issueoriented advocacy advertisements, amounts to discrimination on the basis of content and/or viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made applicable to state entities through the Fourteenth Amendment.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or disclosed or undisclosed nonpublic additional criteria governing Airport advertising, gives Defendants unfettered discretion in enforcement, violating Plaintiff s rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or disclosed or undisclosed nonpublic additional criteria governing Airport advertising is overbroad in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made applicable to state entities through the Fourteenth Amendment.. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and the deprivation of its rights because of Defendants unconstitutional policies and practices. Second Cause of Action Infringement of Freedom of Speech California Constitution, Article I, Section. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein. 0. Defendants refusal to run Plaintiff s Advertisement has restricted and continues to restrict Plaintiff s ability to convey its political message to the public
8 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 and to participate in a debate on a matter of public concern. Defendants actions violate Article I, Section of the California Constitution.. Defendants refusal to run Plaintiff s anti-seaworld Advertisement while accepting and displaying pro-seaworld advertising, as well as similar issueoriented advocacy advertisements, amounts to discrimination on the basis of content and/or viewpoint in violation of Article I, Section of the California Constitution.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or disclosed or undisclosed nonpublic additional criteria governing Airport advertising, gives Defendants unfettered discretion in enforcement, violating Plaintiff s rights under Article I, Section of the California Constitution.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or disclosed or undisclosed nonpublic additional criteria governing Airport advertising is overbroad in violation of Article I, Section of the California Constitution.. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and the deprivation of its rights because of Defendants unconstitutional policies and practices. Third Cause of Action Vagueness Fourteenth Amendment ( U.S.C. ). Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.. The criteria Defendants used and are using to prohibit Plaintiff s Advertisement are not clearly defined such that a person of ordinary intelligence can readily determine whether the Advertisement is allowable or prohibited. Defendant JCDecaux s supposed anti-disparagement policy is not clearly
9 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 defined such that a person of ordinary intelligence can readily determine whether the Advertisement is allowable or prohibited.. Defendant JCDecaux refuses to disclose the criteria upon which it accepts or rejects advertisements, preventing a person of ordinary intelligence from readily determining whether an advertisement is allowable or prohibited.. Defendants Advertising Policy and/or the disclosed or undisclosed additional criteria governing advertising are vague on their face and as applied to Plaintiff.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or the disclosed or undisclosed additional criteria governing Airport advertising, violate Plaintiff s rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 0. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and the deprivation of its rights because of Defendants unconstitutional policies and practices. Fourth Cause of Action Vagueness California Constitution, Article I, Section. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.. The criteria Defendants used and are using to prohibit Plaintiff s Advertisement are not clearly defined such that a person of ordinary intelligence can readily determine whether the Advertisement is allowable or prohibited. Defendant JCDecaux s supposed anti-disparagement policy is not clearly defined such that a person of ordinary intelligence can readily determine whether the Advertisement is allowable or prohibited.. Defendant JCDecaux refuses to disclose the criteria upon which it accepts or rejects advertisements, preventing a person of ordinary intelligence from readily determining whether an advertisement is allowable or prohibited.
10 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Defendants Advertising Policy and/or the disclosed or undisclosed additional criteria governing advertising are vague on their face and as applied to Plaintiff.. Defendants Advertising Policy, and its application of the published Advertising Policy, and/or the disclosed or undisclosed additional criteria governing Airport advertising, violate Plaintiff s rights under the Due Process Clause of Article I, Section of the California Constitution.. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm and the deprivation of its rights because of Defendants unconstitutional policies and practices. Prayer for Relief Wherefore, Plaintiff requests that the Court:. Declare that Defendants have violated and are violating Plaintiff s rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections and of the California Constitution;. Declare that Defendants Advertising Policy is facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections and of the California Constitution;. Declare that Defendants imposition of nonpublic restrictions on advertising at the Airport, including but not limited to the supposed nondisparagement restriction, is unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections and of the California Constitution;. Grant Plaintiff preliminary and permanent injunctive relief ordering Defendant to accept and display Plaintiff s proposed advertisement on terms no less favorable than those given to other nonprofit advertisers;
11 Case :-cv-00-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Award Plaintiff costs and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to U.S.C., Cal. Code Civ. Proc.., Fed. R. Civ. P. (d), and any other applicable law; and. Grant any other relief that the court deems appropriate. Date: March, 0 Respectfully submitted, /s Matthew Strugar Matthew Strugar, SBN matthew-s@petaf.org PETA Foundation W. Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: -- Fax: David Loy, SBN davidloy@acluisandiego.org Sean Riordan, SBN sriordan@aclusandiego.org ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties P.O. Box San Diego, CA Tel: -- Fax: --00 Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADVERTISING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES. ACI-NA Business of Airports Conference April 26, 2017
1 ADVERTISING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES ACI-NA Business of Airports Conference April 26, 2017 FACILITATORS Faith Quilling, Senior Director, Development Clear Channel Airports Shauna Forsythe, Director of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) Civil Action No. Defendants. ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, and CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR HOLDINGS,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-02700 Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB 2101 Webster St., Suite 1300 Oakland, CA 94612, Plaintiff, RICK PERRY,
More information28 U.S.C and The relief requested is authorized pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604
28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1361. The relief requested is authorized pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604 and 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. 3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(b), plaintiff served timely prior notice on defendant of
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: ADRIANO L. MARTINEZ, Cal. Bar No. ELIZABETH B. FORSYTH, Cal. Bar No. Earthjustice 00 Wilshire Blvd, Suite Los Angeles, CA 00 amartinez@earthjustice.org
More informationCase 3:17-cv GPC-BLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 12
Case :-cv-0-gpc-blm Document Filed // PageID. Page of 0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Amar L. Thakur (Bar No. 0) amarthakur@quinnemanuel.com Bruce Zisser (Bar No. 00) brucezisser@quinnemanuel.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION. Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv JFA
3:11-cv-00116-JFA Date Filed 06/21/11 Entry Number 33 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-00116-JFA HILEX POLY COMPANY,
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/09/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:16-cv-07955 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/09/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00818 Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 and CENTER
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00192 Document 1 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY 1825 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 330 Washington, DC 20009, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-ros Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Samantha Ruscavage-Barz NM State Bar No. WildEarth Guardians Montezuma Ave. Santa Fe, NM 0 Tel: (0) - ext. Fax: (0) - Email: sruscavagebarz@wildearthguardians.org
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question City recently opened
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-02350 Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL STAR ROUTE MAIL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; GINA MCCARTHY, in her official
More informationFILED 2018 NOV 30 03:50 PM KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE #: SEA
1 2 3 4 FILED 2018 NOV 30 03:50 PM KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE #: 18-2-14129-0 SEA 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON 6 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 18-2-14129-0 SEA 8 Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DELAWARE AUDUBON SOCIETY, ) CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, and ) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ) ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No.
More informationCase 1:18-cv EJL Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:18-cv-00403-EJL Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 11 Bryan Hurlbutt (ISB # 8501) Laurence J. Lucas (ISB # 4733) ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST P.O. Box 1612 Boise, ID 83701 (208) 342-7024 (208) 342-8286
More informationCase 1:08-cv CMA-MEH Document 1 Filed 08/21/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:08-cv-01787-CMA-MEH Document 1 Filed 08/21/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 Civil Action No. 08-cv- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Colorado Citizens Against ToxicWaste,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND * Maryland Department of the Environment * 1800 Washington Blvd. Baltimore, Maryland 21230 * Plaintiff, * v. * SCOTT PRUITT,
More information14 finance and disclosure law, RCW 42.17A. Defendant Facebook, Inc. (Facebook), an online
1 2 3 4 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON 6 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 8 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES AND FOR INJUNCTIVE 9 V. RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF RCW 42.17A 10 FACEBOOK,
More informationCase 1:15-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:15-cv-00112-BCW Document 2 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 9 Mark F. James (5295) Mitchell A. Stephens (11775) Justin L. James (15167) Hatch, James & Dodge, P.C. 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, V. Plaintiffs, PORT AUTHORITY of
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00713-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AMGEN INC., Plaintiff, v. PIRAMAL HEALTHCARE UK LIMITED, Defendant.
More informationCase 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Lauren Packard (Cal. Bar # CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Broadway Suite 00 Oakland, CA Phone: 0--00 x0 Fax: 0--0 email: lpackard@biologicaldiversity.org Attorney
More informationCase 2:10-cv BAF -RSW Document 1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:10-cv-13101-BAF -RSW Document 1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) )) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No.
More informationELECTRONIC SIGN PSA NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS APPLICATION
ELECTRONIC SIGN PSA NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS APPLICATION Name of Non-Profit: Contact Name: Contact Phone #: Contact Email: Wording for Sign (Please limit to 4 lines/20 characters per line): Do you have
More informationCase 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-01639 Document 1 Filed 10/03/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOOD AND WATER WATCH 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036, and FRIENDS
More informationSTATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. Defendant. I. NATURE OF ACTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 8 9 10 11 12 V. GOGGLE, INC., Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES AND FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 11/14/2012 4:38 PM CV-2012-901531.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA FLORENCE CAUTHEN, CLERK INNOVATION SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT,
More informationCase 1:17-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2017 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:17-cv-24049-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2017 Page 1 of 10 BECKMAN COULTER, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION v. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CASE NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH A. LANCI 6785 Gates Mills Boulevard Gates Mills, Ohio 44040 v. Plaintiff, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Janette K. Brimmer (WSB # EARTHJUSTICE 0 Second Avenue, Suite T:.. F:.. E: jbrimmer@earthjustice.org Colin C. O Brien (pro hac vice pending EARTHJUSTICE W th Avenue,
More informationJanis A. Ingve, the plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, through below signed counsel, David H.
District Court City and County of Denver, Colorado City & County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO. 80202 DATE FILED: October 28, 2014 12:17 PM FILING ID: FA2C0E972B25D CASE NUMBER: 2014CV32468 Janis
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. AMEREN CORPORATION, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Sierra Club, by
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 732 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 67711 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PFIZER INC., WYETH LLC. and WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC., v. SANDOZ
More informationCAUSE NO. ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE, AND NOTICE OF HEARING
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-18-001968 4/24/2018 9:42 AM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-18-001968 Carrisa Escalante TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, AMERICAN
More informationTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN SUPERIOR COURT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mark R. Wolfe, CSB No. 1 M. R. WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Telephone: Fax: (1) -0 mrw@mrwolfeassociates.com Attorney for Petitioner ORGANIZACION COMUNIDAD DE ALVISO, an unincorporated association,
More informationUSDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv document 1 filed 07/23/18 page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv-00052 document 1 filed 07/23/18 page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION TIPPECANOE COUNTY RIGHT TO ) LIFE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-11227 Document 1 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:14-cv KBF Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6
Case 114-cv-08166-KBF Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 David L. Mazaroli Attorney for Plaintiff 250 Park Avenue New York, NY 10177 Tel. (212)267-8480 Fax. (212)732-7352 e-mail dlm@mazarolilaw.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. FIRSTENERGY GENERATION CORP.
More informationCase 1:16-cv ER Document 66 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:16-cv-05023-ER Document 66 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- )C BRONJC INDEPENDENT
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Kathryn S. Diemer Diemer & Wei, LLP 00 West San Fernando St. Ste. San Jose, CA P: 0--0 F: 0-- kdiemer@diemerwei.com Phillip A. Bock (pro hac vice to be requested)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 TAMARA T. ZAKIM (CA Bar No. tzakim@earthjustice.org GREGORY C. LOARIE (CA Bar No. gloarie@earthjustice.org Earthjustice 0 California Street, Suite 00
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 Roger P. Bingham, Esq. (SBN Attorneys At Law Email: rpb@rbinghamlaw.com Facsimile: ( 0-00 Attorneys for Third-Party Plaintiffs SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN
More informationPolicies and Procedures No. 21
Policies and Procedures No. 21 SUBJECT: Board Approval: 4/12/2018 MTS REVENUE-GENERATING DISPLAY ADVERTISING, CONCESSIONS, AND MERCHANDISE PURPOSE: To establish a policy and guidelines concerning a revenue-generating
More informationFee Authority: ORS (1),(2)(a)
// :: AM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH PATRICIA HARRINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AIRBNB, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AMGEN INC. and AMGEN MANUFACTURING LIMITED, Plaintiff, Case No. v. APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP., Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
More informationCase 5:17-cv EJD Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-0-ejd Document Filed 0// Page of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Daniel M. Radke (Bar. No. 0) Daniel.Radke@lw.com 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 000 San Francisco, CA - Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -0 LATHAM
More informationCase 3:17-cv SDD-RLB Document 1 01/12/17 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Civil No.
Case 3:17-cv-00026-SDD-RLB Document 1 01/12/17 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:18-cv-01042-CCC 3:02-at-06000 Document Document 597 1 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 1 of of 50 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIERRA CLUB, v. Plaintiff, TALEN ENERGY
More informationCase 1:18-cv VAC-CJB Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-00838-VAC-CJB Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationFILED 2010 May-04 PM 01:08 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
Case 2:10-cv-01159-KOB Document 1 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 24 FILED 2010 May-04 PM 01:08 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
More informationCase 2:18-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 218-cv-00470-JFC Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ------------------------------------------------------ x JILL FERGUSON, Civil
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:09-cv-02089-ESH Document 1 Filed 11/04/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SIERRA CLUB ) 85 Second Street, 2 nd Floor ) San Francisco, CA 94105 ) ) VALLEY
More informationPlaintiffs Ingrid Avendaño, Roxana del Toro Lopez, and Ana Medina, individually, and
Plaintiffs Ingrid Avendaño, Roxana del Toro Lopez, and Ana Medina, individually, and on behalf of all aggrieved employees and the State of California as the real party in interest, allege the following
More informationMTA ADVERTISING POLICY
MTA ADVERTISING POLICY I. PURPOSE A. To establish uniform, reasonable, and viewpoint-neutral standards for the display of advertising in and on the facilities, vehicles and other property (together Property
More informationCase 1:14-cv SS Document 1 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00034-SS Document 1 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION WICKFIRE, LLC. Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-34
More informationCase 3:14-cv VLB Document 1 Filed 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT
Case 314-cv-01429-VLB Document 1 Filed 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COLE WILLIAMS and NOVACK LAZARE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
More informationFEBRUARY 2000 LAW REVIEW SCHOOL REFUSES TO POST TEN COMMANDMENTS ADVERTISEMENT ON BALLFIELD FENCE
SCHOOL REFUSES TO POST TEN COMMANDMENTS ADVERTISEMENT ON BALLFIELD FENCE James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2000 James C. Kozlowski In the case of Diloreto v. Downey Unified School District, No. 98-56762
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COLIN O BRIEN, SB No. 0 cobrien@earthjustice.org PAUL CORT, SB No. 1 pcort@earthjustice.org EARTHJUSTICE 0 California Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 1 Tel. (1) 1-000 / Fax. (1) 1-00 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
More informationCase 1:14-cv CM Document 6 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:14-cv-07097-CM Document 6 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x KEVIN BRANCA,
More information~)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ) 1100 15th Street, NW, 11th Floor ) Washington, DC 20005 ) n~~~ ) ) ~ ) ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY
More informationCase 3:10-cv JPG -PMF Document 234 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #9055
Case 3:10-cv-00188-JPG -PMF Document 234 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #9055 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CITY OF GREENVILLE, ILLINOIS et al. Individually
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 0 0 RYAN J. PATTERSON (SBN ) JAMES B. KRAUS (SBN ) JOHNATHON H. CROOK (SBN ) ZACKS, FREEDMAN & PATTERSON, PC Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco,
More information1. This case challenges the legality of President Barack Obama's Proclamation COMPLAINT ACTION FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Case 1:17-cv-00285-CL Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 8 Michael E. email Julie A. email: OSB No. 772030 200 SW Market Street, Suite 1777 Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: (503) 225-0777 Facsimile: (503)
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed // Page of 0 Jeremy C. Lieb (WSB # Erik Grafe (AK Bar #0000 (pro hac vice pending EARTHJUSTICE T: 0..00 F: 0..0 E: jlieb@earthjustice.org egrafe@earthjustice.org Kristen L.
More informationJune 19, Dear Committee Members:
June 19, 2014 The Education and Certification Committee The Florida Association of Code Enforcement C/O The Florida Institute of Government at The University of Central Florida 12443 Research Parkway,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
CAROL A. SOBEL SBN LAW OFFICE OF CAROL A. SOBEL Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, California 001 t. -0 f. 1- e. carolsobel@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH DIVISION
Case 2:08-cv-00293-MBC 2:05-mc-02025 Document 2721 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 11 of of 13 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH DIVISION SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 06/06/ :01 AM INDEX NO /2017E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/06/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK BRONX COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------------------X X MARK GJONAJ, CLARISA ALAYETO, FELIX Index No.: 28102/2017E APONTE, BERNARD SMITH,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No.
FREDRIC D. WOOCHER (SBN ) BEVERLY GROSSMAN PALMER (SBN 00) STRUMWASSER & WOOCHER LLP 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 000 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () 1-0 E-mail: bpalmer@strumwooch.com
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 14 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Amending the SFMTA s Advertising Policy to revise
More information4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 03/09/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22
4:15-cv-01111-RBH Date Filed 03/09/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION JERRY GREEN AND TWALA SCOTT, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY
More informationP a r t n e r s h i p P r o g r a m
Blue and Gold Sponsor $4,350 Recognition of sponsorship on all Spring-Ford televised shows Spring-Ford Area School District P a r t n e r s h i p P r o g r a m Foundation publications and at events Ram
More informationCase3:13-cv JCS Document1 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 13
Case:-cv-00-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 HARVEY SISKIND LLP LAWRENCE J. SISKIND (SBN ) Email: siskind@harveysiskind.com DONALD A. THOMPSON (SBN 00) Email: dthompson@harveysiskind.com Four Embarcadero
More informationCase 3:18-cv RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:18-cv-01388-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION STEVEN D. MARCRUM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-06465 Document 1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : RODNEY GRACZYK, DON DAVIS and : JERRY RIDDLE, for themselves and all
More information16CV E-FILED 9/1/ :20:57 AM David H. Yamasaki Chief Executive Officer/Clerk Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Zifkin (SBN (dzifkin@bsfllp.com 01 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, CA 001, Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -0 Additional counsel identified on signature page
More informationPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) Approval Pathway for Biosimilar Biological Products
Approval Pathway for Biosimilar Biological Products On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Senate passed the, its version of comprehensive healthcare reform legislation. On March 21, 2010, the U.S. House of Representatives
More informationCase: 1:18-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 1 of 17 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case: 1:18-cv-00090-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 1 of 17 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) and ) ) THE STATE OF OHIO,
More informationCase 1:13-cv JPO Document 1 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 5. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT and FOR JURY TRIAL " AVON PRODUCTS, INC. Defendant.
Case 1:13-cv-00150-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 5 JUDGE OETKEM 13 CV 0i50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JADE BARRETT, and all others similarly situated, Civil Action
More informationCase 3:15-cv HSG Document 37 Filed 10/26/16 Page 1 of 22
Case :-cv-00-hsg Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Robert S. Green, (SBN ) James Robert Noblin (SBN ) GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C. 00 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 0 Larkspur, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0
More informationCase 1:17-cv RWS Document 25 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:17-cv-06989-RWS Document 25 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1-4 Filed 09/13/17 Page 1 of 5. Exhibit C
Case :-cv-0 Document - Filed 0// Page of Exhibit C Case :-cv-0 Document - Filed 0// Page of William J. Friedman (pro hac vice pending) S. West St. Alexandria, VA Tel.:.. Email: pedlarfarm@gmail.com Attorney
More informationCase 2:18-cv MSG Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:18-cv-02151-MSG Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAMALYN S. ANEN, on behalf of : herself and others similarly situated
More informationCase: 1:69-cv Document #: 5109 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:34648
Case: 1:69-cv-02145 Document #: 5109 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:34648 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL L. SHAKMAN, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:15-cv ML-PAS Document 15 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 496 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:15-cv-00165-ML-PAS Document 15 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 496 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:15-cv-165-ML-PAS
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00806 Document 1 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CITY OF AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. NO. STATE OF TEXAS and GREG
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Susan Nash (State Bar # 1) Law Office of Susan Nash P.O. Box 0 Idyllwild CA Telephone: (0) - Fax: (1) -1 E-mail: snash@earthlink.net Attorney for Petitioners/Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
More informationCurrent Legal and Liability Issues for Ports and You, the Governing Board Member. Governor Eric Holcomb
Current Legal and Liability Issues for Ports and You, the Governing Board Member Andrea L. Hermer General Counsel Cyndi Carrasco Deputy General Counsel to Governor Eric Holcomb PUBLIC PORT AUTHORITIES
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE FAIR CHANCE INITIATIVE FOR HIRING (BAN THE BOX) ORDINANCE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 22, 2017
CITY OF LOS ANGELES RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE FAIR CHANCE INITIATIVE FOR HIRING (BAN THE BOX) ORDINANCE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 22, 2017 Department of Public Works Bureau of Contract Administration
More informationSteven L. Wittels (N.Y. SBN ) (Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending)
0 Marc Thomas Litton (SBN ) tmlitton@gmail.com SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - Steven L. Wittels (N.Y. SBN 00) (Pro Hac Vice
More informationCase 3:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT HUNTINGTON
Case 3:10-cv-00847 Document 1 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT HUNTINGTON OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INC., WEST VIRGINIA
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Scott A. Miller, Esq., SB # 0 Bonnie Fong, Esq., SB # LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT A. MILLER A Professional Law Corporation 0 Ventura Blvd. Suite 0 Sherman Oaks, CA 0 Tel. ( -01 Kelly Ann Buschman, SB # LAW OFFICES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:18-cv-03217-PAE Document 1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK J137-3458 E. Mishan & Sons, Inc., v. Plaintiff, Smart and Eazy Corp., and MasterPan,
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiffs, NO. Plaintiff New England Power Generators Association, Inc. 1 ("NEPGA") and GenOn
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT SUFFOLK COUNTY, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT NEW ENGLAND POWER GENERATORS ASSOCIATION AND GENON ENERGY, INC., V. Plaintiffs, NO. THE MASSACHUSETTS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No.
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// 0 WSBA # Avista Corporation Telephone: (0) - LOCAL COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL FOR AVISTA CORPORATION Additional Plaintiffs counsel on signature page AVISTA CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) Attorney General Chris Koster, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) WALGREEN CO., ) Division: An Illinois Corporation,
More informationCase 2:13-at Document 1 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 18
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Robert J. Tuerck, State Bar No. JACKSON & TUERCK Main Street, Suite C P.O. Box Quincy, CA Tel: (0) -00 Fax: (0) -0 E-mail: bob@jacksontuerck.com Andrew L. Packard,
More information