Integrated Watershed Management Programme Preliminary Project Report (PPR)

Transcription

1 Integrated Watershed Management Programme Preliminary Project Report (PPR) Name of the Project : District Name IWMP- Sr. of Project/ (Mega W/s) Block : District Content Vasundhara Watershed Development Agency. Maharashtra State. Sr. Chapter/Table Particulars Page I Institutional Structures 1

2 I A State Level Nodal Agency Content Table PPR-1 Details of SLNA Table PPR-2 Details of functionaries in the SLNA Table PPR-3 Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) functionaries I B District Level Watershed Units Table PPR-4 Details of functionaries in the Watershed Cell cum Data Centre (WCDC) II Selection of Watershed Projects Table PPR-5 Table PPR-6 Status of District wise area covered under watershed programme Prioritized list of projects proposed for sanction III Profile of the each selected watershed project Table PPR-7 Project at a glance Table PPR-8 Details of Previously identified DPAP/DDP Areas Table PPR-9 Land use pattern of the project Abstract of Project IV Agro-climatic condition of project area. Table PPR-10 Details of Agro-climatic condition. Table PPR-11 Details of flood and draught Table PPR-12 Detail of Soil Erosion 2

3 V Demography & land distribution VI Livelihoods Table PPR-13 Summary of Livelihoods VII (i) Expected employment related outcomes VII (ii) Water related out comes VII (iii) Crop related out comes VIII Mandatory certificates IX Status of on-going projects Table PPR-14 Employment generation Table PPR-15 Details of Migration Table PPR-16 Details of average Ground Water Table Depth Table PPR-17 Status of Drinking Water Table PPR-18 Major crops grown and their productivity Table PPR-19 Details of Pending UCs Table PPR-20 Details of unspent balance Table PPR-21 Expected out comes X Maps- 1. Location Map of the Project 2. Mega Watershed showing Clusters of Project area Map 3. Project Map Showing Village & Micro watershed boundaries 3

4 I. A. State Level Nodal Agencies (SLNAs) : Table PPR 1 : Details of SLNA Sr. State Type SLNA. Date of Notification Date of MoU with DoLR Total of Members of SLNA Name Chairperson Designation Name Designation Date of Appointment CEO Nature of Appointment Tenure ( of Years) Contact Ph. / Fax / ) MAHARASHTRA Society (Registered under Societies Registration act 1860) Govt. Of Maharashtra, Resolution Dated- 21 May 2008 Registered on 5/12/ Mar Shri V. Giriraj Principal Secretary (Water Conservation) Shri Umakant Dangat Commissioner of Agriculture 16 March 2012 Ex- Officio --- Phone Fax vslnapune@gmail.com 4

5 Sr. of persons working in the SLNA for IWMP Table PPR 2 : Details of functionaries in the SLNAs Name of Designation 5 14 V. B. Auti Tech.Officer Qualific ation Experience in Years Work allocation Monthly remunera tion (Rs.) Total budgets of SLNA (Rs.in Lac) Funding expected from DopLR(Rs.in Lac) R NR R NR Mr.M.S. Gholap M.Sc. 29 Joint CEO (Agri.) (Agri) 2 Mr.I.D. Deshmukh Joint CEO. (Capacity Building) 3 Mr. A.S. Apte Joint CEO (Livelihood & Administrative) M.Sc. (Agri) M.Sc. (Forestr y) 27 Agri. Related works Capacity Building 25 Livelihood & Administrat ive T.E. (I.T ) vacant Mr. S.A. Ghorpade GIS Expert 7 Mr. A.D. Joshi Finance Officer M.Sc. (Agri), M.Sc. (Agri), PG (GIS) MA, Dip. In HE B.Com, LLB 26 Agri. Related works GIS Fianance Work Mr. R.Y. Kadu 28 Accounts Accounts Officer 9 Accounts Assistant vacant

6 10 Mr. P.K. Dongre Accounts Assistant B.Sc.,Dip. Civil Engg. 28 Admin Mr.M.P. Kachare B.Sc. (Agri) 7 Assistant PPR, DPR Smt. L. M. Pawar B.Sc. (Agri) 7 EPA, Assistant NGO-PIA Smt. S.G. Kadu M.Sc. 7 Capacity (Agri.) Building Mr. R.A. Gadekar B.Sc.(Agri.) 7 PPR, DPR Mr. S.M. Zirpe Assistant B.A. BEd 3 Admin Mr. R.S. Gandhi B.Com & 2 Assistant MCM PPR, DPR Accounts Assistant vacant - - 6

7 Sr. Total of persons working in the SLNA for IWMP Name of Designation 5 Mr. S. A. Ghorpade 14 GIS Expert Table PPR 3 : Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) Functionaries Qualification Experien ce in Years Work allocation Monthly remuner ation (Rs.) Total budgets of SLNA (Rs. in Lac) Funding expected from DoLR (Rs. in Lac) R NR R NR Mr. M. S. Gholap M.Sc. (Agri) 29 Agri. Related Joint CEO (Agri.) works Mr. I. D. Deshmukh Joint M.Sc. (Agri) 27 Capacity CEO. (Capacity Building) Building Mr. A. S. Apte Joint CEO M.Sc. (Forestry) 25 Livelihood & (Livelihood & Administrative) Administrative T.E. (I.T ) Vacant M.Sc. (Agri), M.Sc. (Geo-hazards), Diploma in computer Programming PGDAEM GIS Mr. A.D. Joshi MA, Dip. In HE 34 Fianance Finance Officer Work V. B. Auti Tech.Officer M.Sc. (Agri), 26 Agri. Related works Mr. R.Y. Kadu B.Com, LLB 28 Accounts Officer Accounts Accounts Assistant vacant - - 7

8 10 Mr. P.K. Dongre B.Sc.,Dip. Civil Engg. 28 Accounts Assistant Admin Mr. M. P. Kachare Assistant B.Sc. (Agri) 7 PPR, DPR Smt. L. M. Pawar B.Sc. (Agri) 7 EPA, NGO- Assistant PIA Mr. R. A. Gadekar B.Sc.(Agri.) 7 Assistant PPR, DPR Mr. S. M. Zirpe B.A. BEd 3 Assistant Admin Mr. R.S. Gandhi B.Com & MCM 2 Assistant PPR, DPR

9 I. B. District Level Watershed Units: Table-PPR 4: Details of functionaries in the Watershed Cell Cum Data Centre * Name of Date of Total no. of persons Name Status of the signing of working for Names & Qualifi of the Chairman Experience executing MoU with Watershed Designation cation Agency# SLNA programme S. Work allocation Table-PPR 4: Details of functionaries in the Watershed Cell. Contd Monthly Total budget of Watershed Cell Funding expected from DoLR (Rs.) remuneration (Rs.) (Rs.) R NR R NR R Recurring; NR- Non-recurring *From column no. 2, no. of districts; from column no. 3, no. of executive agencies; from column no. 6, no. of persons working in the executive agencies of watershed programme; from column no.7, total no. of personnel engaged in the watershed cells, from column no. 11 to 13, totals for the State may be indicated at the end of the table. #DWDU/ DRDA/ Zillah Parishad (ZP)/ State Department (please specify)/ any other (Please ZP/ CDO/ DDO/ PD/ Any other (please specify) 9

10 II. SELECTION OF WATERSHED PROJECTS Table-PPR 5: Status of District-wise area covered under the watershed programme (MIS Table-M(SP)2) Micro-watersheds covered so far Sr. Name of District Total microwatersheds in the District Dept. of Land Pre-IWMP projects (DPAP +DDP +IWDP) IWMP to Other Ministries/ Depts. # Any other Watershed Project Total micro watersheds covered Net micro watersheds to be covered Area (ha.) Area (ha.) Area (ha.) Area (ha.) Area (ha.) Area (ha.) Total from column no.2, total no. of districts; from columns 3 to 5, the totals for the entire State may be given at the end of the This information should be collected from DRDA #Give names of watershed projects. e.g. RIDF, Marathwada Mission, RVP, WGDP, Gatiman, NWDP etc. 10

11 Table-PPR 6: Prioritized list of projects proposed for sanction during the financial year _ S. District Name of the project in Total of microwatersheds proposed to be covered Proposed project area (Treatment area) (ha) Type of project (Hilly/ Desert/ Others) Proposed cost (Rs. in lakh) Weightage under the criteria# i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total * From column no. 2, Name of district, from column no. 3, total no. of projects selected for sanction, from column no. 4, total no. of micro-watersheds to be covered, from column no. 5, total project area proposed, from column no. 7, total cost proposed, may be indicated for the entire District at the end of the table. # Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed S. Maximum Criteria score Ranges & scores i Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5) ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5) Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0) iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) farmers v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) vi Moisture index/ & below (15) to (10) 0 to (0) DPAP/ DDP Block DDP Block DPAP Block Non DPAP/ DDP Block vii Area under rain-fed 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Below 70 % agriculture (Reject) viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0) 11

12 ix Degraded land 15 High above 20 % (15) Medium 10 to 20 % (10) x Productivity potential of the land xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project) xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project) 15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15) 10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10) 15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15) 15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15) Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10) Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5) 4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10) 3 to 5 microwatersheds in cluster (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5) Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5) Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0) 2 to 4 microwatersheds in cluster (5) 2 to 3 microwatersheds in cluster (5) Total

13 III) PROJECT WISE PROFILE OF THE SELECTED WATERSHED PROJECT Table PPR 7: Project at a Glance 1 Name of the State Maharashtra 2 Name of the District 3 a. Name of the project b. Type # of the project (Hilly/ Desert/ Other)& cost norm/ha 4 Names of the Block 5 Names of Grampanchayat Total GP 6 Names & Census Code of Villages covered under Grampanchayat Name village of census code Name of village census code Name of village census code Name of village census code Total no. of villages Codes no. of the micro-watersheds Name of village 1 Codes of micro W/s Name of village 1 Codes of micro W/s Name of village 1 Codes of micro W/s Name of village 1 Codes of micro W/s Total no. of micro W/s Four major reasons for selection of watershed 9 Geographical Area of the Project(ha.) 10 Area proposed to be treated (ha.) 11 Area available for treatment (ha.) 13

14 12 Area already treated under different schemes 13 Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 14 First installment 20% of Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 15 Name and Address of proposed PIA 16 Any other (Please Specify) # for definition of type please see Appendix-I 14

15 Table-PPR 8: Details of previously identified DPAP/ DDP areas proposed under IWMP during the financial year* Year ( Area in ha.) Sr. No. Name of the District Name of Block (s) Type of Block (DPAP /DDP / IWDP/ other) Area of the block (ha.) Area Available for treatmen t of the block Pre. IWMP Projects (All Schemes) of projects of IWMP Projects sanctioned during Area of Projects Area Balance area For Treatment (6-(8+10)) of the project propose d Total Treatment Area of the all Proposed Projects of of Block # Area proposed to covered by schemes other than DoLR Net balance area 11-(13+14) Total Total From column no. 2, total no. of districts, from column no. 3, total no. of projects proposed, from column no. 4, total no. of blocks, from column no. 6 to 12, totals, may be indicated for the entire State at the end of the table. # Mention the Name of the schemes e.g.dpap,haryali,iwdp RIDF, NWDPRA, Marathwada Mission, Gatiman, RVP, WGDP etc. 15

16 Table-PPR 9: Land Use pattern of the project* (Area in ha) Sr. Names of villages Geogra phical Area of the village Code of Micro water sheds in village Forest Area Forest Area available for treatment Land under agricult ure use Rain fed area Permanent pastures Wasteland Area available for treatment (Col ) Area already treated under other schemes Area Proposed for Treatment (12+6)-13) Noncultiva Cultiv able ble Source of data: * From column no. 2, total no. of villages, from column no. 3, total no. of micro watersheds villages, from column no. 4 to 14, totals, may be indicated for the project at the end of the table. 16

17 Abstract of the Project Area sr. No Distric t Taluka Name of the Cluster Geo. Area ha Cumulative Weight age of Micro water shed Rain fed Area Cultivable Waste land Proposed Project Area Non Cultivable Waste land Pasture land Forest Area Area Proposed for treatment col.( ) Cost/ha total Project cost(rs. in Lakhs) TOTAL Give the figure of only treatment area in col.no.8,9,10,11,12 17

18 IV. AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITION Briefly describe the agro-climatic condition of project area including the Agro-climatic zone of project area, soil types, rainfall, major crops, etc. Table PPR 10: Details of Agro-climatic condition* Name of the Average Major soil types Agroclimatic in mm rainfall Names Name of Area in of the Topography the zone ha villages b) Area (precedi # a) Project covers a)type in ha ng 5 Name project years area average) Major crops b) Area in ha * From column no. 5, total no. of villages, from column no. 6, total area, from column no. 9, total no. of crops and total cropped area, may be indicated for the project at the end of the table. # Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope 18

19 Table-PPR 11: Details of flood and drought in the project area* Sl. Name of Calamity Affected Villages Not Affected Periodicity Names of affected Villages Flood 2 Drought 3 Cyclone * From column nos. 4 & 5, total no. of villages, category wise, for the project may be given at the end of the table. Table-PPR 12 : Details of soil erosion in the project area Cause Type of erosion Water erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year) a Sheet b Rill c Gully Sub-Total Wind erosion NA Total 19

20 V. DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND DISTRIBUTION Sr. Name of village Population Population as per 2001 Census Work Force Available Sex Ratio SC ST Other Total Literacy % Agriculture Industry Other Total For Project V.1- Household Information Sr. Name of village Total Housholds BPL Housholds % BPL Housholds Total Landless Housholds % Landless Housholds 1 2 Total for Project Growth in population during the last three census, per capita availability of land, sex ratio, population age group in the project area, literacy level, migration, workforce available in different sectors of the economy, demography of SC, ST, BPL and landless families in the project area in the last ten years, etc. 20

21 VI. LIVELIHOODS Briefly describe the existing livelihoods, raw material available, possible livelihood interventions, scope for capacity building etc. in the project area Table-PPR 13 Summary of livelihoods S. Name of the village Existing livelihood activities Possible livelihood interventions under the project Current status of migration ( of people) Main reasons for migration VII. EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES VII. (i). Expected employment related outcomes: Table-PPR 14: Employment generation Name Wage employment Self employment S. of the of man days of beneficiaries of beneficiaries village SC ST Others Total Women SC ST Others Total Women SC ST Others Total Women Total * From column no. 2, total no. of villages, from column no. 3 & 4, category-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for the project. 21

22 Table-PPR 15: Details of migration from Project area Sl. Names of villages of persons migrating of days per year of migration Major reason(s) for migrating Expected reduction in no. of persons migrating Total * From column no. 2, total no. of villages; from column no. 3, total no. of persons migrating; from column no. 4, average no. of days for annual migration; from column no. 6, total expected reduction on no. of persons migrating, for the project may be given at the end of the Table. VII. (ii). Water related outcomes: Table-PPR 16: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) Expected postproject level Pre-Project level S. Name of village Open wells Bore wells Open wells Bore wells Source of data:gsda Record 22

23 S. Table-PPR 17: Status of Drinking water* Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water Name of (no. of months in a year) Comments the village Expected Post-project Preproject Preproject Expected Postproject Total * from column no. 2, total no. of villages implementing the programme, from column no. 3, average no. of months may be given at the end of the table for the entire project. VII. (iii). Crop related outcomes: Table-PPR 18- Major crops grown and their productivity in the project area Expected post project Current status Name of the status Crop S. Kharif Rabi Zaid/Other season Area (ha) Productivity (kg/ ha) Area (ha) Productivity (kg/ ha) * From column no. 2, total no. of crops; from columns no. 3 & 4, total cropped area, average productivity, for the project may be given at the end of the Table. 23

24 VIII. MANDATORY CERTIFICATION It is certified that the State Government of Maharashtra will abide by the following mandatory conditions laid down by DoLR 1 The area of the proposed projects are not covered under assured irrigation 2 The area of the proposed project is not covered or overlapping with any other watershed projects sanctioned by the central govt./ state govt./ autonomous bodies & others 3 The State/WCDC must sign all the mandatory MoUs before implementing the project 4 The timeframes and milestones of the projects will be followed 5 The Budget requested for must follow the criteria laid down in the Common Guidelines, 2008 & its amendments 6 The State must release matching State Share within 15 days from release of each installment of central funds 7 Purchase of vehicles and other equipments are not permitted and nor is construction of buildings allowed. Only purchase of computers and related software is permitted 8 Savings, if any, in each component of the project cost can be utilized only for activities in the Watershed works 9 The WCDC will have one Member exclusively responsible for monitoring 10 All works will be evaluated after each phase of completion. Fund release will depend on favorable reports received from evaluators 11 Evaluators must include only institutions and agencies and not individuals 12 The State and WCDC cell will furnish monitoring reports and periodical reports as desired by DoLR 13 Composition of the WDT must be clearly spelt out and the team Members must be fully in place at the time of signing of the MoU of contract between the PIA and WCDC Cell 14 That WCDC shall release the funds to the PIAs and the watershed committees within 15 days of receipt of the funds 15 The Watershed Committee must be a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, At least one of the WDT Members must be a woman 17 The Gram Sabhas of the proposed project areas have passed resolutions for people s contribution towards WDF 24

25 18 Resource-use agreements on the principles of equity and sustainability must be worked out among the User Groups prior to the concerned work being undertaken 19 The DPR must give detailed justification for the proposed project duration 20 No works on private lands will be repaired/ maintained from the WDF 21 The PIA will start project work within three months of the receipt of first installment by WCDC or else it can come under the purview of foreclosure 22 The State/WCDC will not undertake unnecessary foreclosure of the projects. In the event of foreclosure, the State/WCDC will refund the amount and furnish all necessary documents as desired by DoLR. The State shall also take administrative and legal action against any defalcation, misappropriation, mis-utilization, deliberate negligence and laxity which has caused foreclosure of the project. Date: Project Manager (IWMP) Watershed Cell cum Data Centre & District Superintending Agriculture Officer, District- *Letter of Authority from Secretary of the concerned Department, authorizing the concerned officer to sign the above undertaking, should be enclosed with PPR. 25

26 IX. STATUS OF ON-GOING PROJECTS (DPAP/ DDP/ IWDP) S. No. Table- PPR 19: Details of pending UCs: Statewise* Date of Submission of submission of UC UC District Project Instal -ment no. Financial year of release of fund Amount released (Rs. in lakh) Amount utilized (Rs.in lakhs) Due date Amount (Rs. in lakhs) Date Amount (Rs. in lakhs) Reasons for not submitting/ delayed submission of UC Pending UCs Period Amount (Rs. in lakhs) *From column 2, total no. of Districts, from column 3, total no. of projects, from column no. 6, total amount released, from column 7, total amount utilized, from column 8, total amount due, from column no. 9, total amount for which UCs submitted, from column 11, total amount of the pending UCs, may be mentioned at the end of the table for the entire State. 26

27 Table- PPR 20: Details of Unspent balance as on : Districtwise* Total funds Name of Expenditure Total cost released District the (Rs. In Lakhs) (Rs. in lakh) (Rs. in lakh) Project S. DoLR State Unspent balance (Rs. in lakhs) Tot al *From column 2, total no. of Districts, from column 3, total no. of projects, from column no.4 to 6, totals, may be mentioned at the end of the table for the entire State 27

28 Table-PPR-21:EXPECTED OUTCOMES Sr. No Items Unit of Measurement Pre Project Status Expected Post Project Status 1. Status of Water Table Meter 2. Structures Repaired / Rejuvenated 3. Quality of Drinking Qualitative Water 4. Availability of Drinking Months Water 5. Increase in Irrigation ha Potential 6. Change in Cropping Type Pattern 7. Area Under Single Crop ha 8. Area Under Double ha Crop 9. Area Under multiple ha Crop 10. Area Under Vegetation ha 11. Area Under ha Horticulture 12. Area Under Fuel & ha Fodder 13. Milk Production Liter / day 14. SHGs 15. Livelihoods 16. Average Family income Rs. /Month 28

29 29

30 30

31 31