Aquaculture America 2006 Las Vegas, USA

Transcription

1 Aquaculture America 2006 Las Vegas, USA Shrimp Production in ASP Systems, CP Indonesia: Development of the Technology from R&D to Commercial Production Nyan Taw PT. Dipasena Citra Darmja (Former VP, PT. Central Pertiwi Bahari) 15, February 2006

2 Acknowledgement The presentation is based on studies carried out at PT. Central Pertiwi Bahari (CP Indonesia) shrimp farm in Indonesia. The author would like to sincerely thank the staff and members of CPB especially the Technology Development Division team for their hard work to make the study possible. Sincere thanks are also due to Senior Members of CPB and CP Indonesia especially Mr. Benjamin Jairavanon, Mr. Haryono Djanoko, Dr. Dean Akiyama and Mr. Rudyan Kopot, DCD (former CEO, CPI) without their earnest support this study could not have materialized.

3 Introduction Shrimp farming has become competitive and as such the technology utilized needs to be efficient in all aspects productivity, quality, sustainability, biosecurity and to be in line with market demand. The concept has prompted the industry to give emphasis on having a strong field R&D and trials for commercial utilization. Present ASP (microbial floc) system is one of the major contributions of R &D for commercial application. The system has been partially presented at World Aquaculture 2005 in Bali (Nyan Taw, 2005b; Nyan Taw & Saenphon Ch., 2005; Saenphon Ch. et.al. 2005)

4 Technology Development Strategy AQUACULTURE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION 1 st Step R & D Technology (Establish) Technology Feed Back Feed Back FARMER POND TRIAL POND 2 nd Step Technology Feed Back Tech. Dev CENTER Confirm Technology Transfer Tech. Confirm Technology Transfer (COMMERCIAL) Technology (Confirm) Technology Feed Back FINAL - 4 th Step COMPANY POND (Commercial) 3 rd Step

5 Technology Development Objectives 1. To develop productive and efficient culture technology for farmer commercial ponds. 2. To diversify technology and culture species to be more competitive in the industry. 3. To enhance the technicians intellect

6 Technology Development Policy!""#$% & '!""#$% & ( % )%* % """ )% ""!""% & % )%* %

7 Technology Development Locations "" GROW OUT PONDS Full-PE lined (5,000m2) -189 ponds Semi-PE lined (5,000m2) - Earthen (5,000m2) - 26 ponds 86 ponds Total ponds GROW OUT PONDS Full-PE lined (5,000m2) - 12 ponds Semi-PE lined (5,000m2) - 26 ponds Earthen (5,000m2)( CPI ) - 2 ponds Total 40 ponds NURSERY Full PE lined (72m2) - 20 tanks GROW OUT PONDS Intensive ( Full PE lined ) - 27 ponds Intensive ( Semi PE lined ) - 10 ponds Intensive ( Earthen ) - 21 ponds Extensive ( Earthen ) - 15 ponds Total 73 ponds

8 The FLOC FLOC COMMUNITIES AND SIZE 100 µ The FLOC Defined as macroaggregates diatoms, macroalgae, facial pellets, exoskeleton, remains of dead organisms, bacteria, protest and invertebrates. (Decamp, O., et al 2002) As Natural Feed (filter feeders L. vannamie & Tilapia) : It is possible that microbial protein has a higher availability than feed protein (Yoram, 2005)

9 Sampling Method Measuring procedure,,(",%-" Let it settled for minutes Read density of flocs in cone (ml/l)

10 The Basic.//-) 0,"./ 1"2., / 3 '.4! % High aeration Settled flocs Grain pellet

11 Pond Water Preparation " ) Day Activity Urea 8 kg & TSP 1 kg Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg Tea seed cake 15 ppm Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg Grain pellet 50 kg, Molasses 8 kg & Kaolin 50 kg Grain pellet 50 kg Kaolin 50 kg

12 Pond Operation High Aeration / Vannamei - Bacterial Floc PWA 15 HP ( 7 x 1HP and 4 x 2HP ) I H G NOTE : PWA 1 HP PWA 2 HP Rope F E D C B A 5/

13 Feed and Growth Avg. F/D, GP Consumption & Growth Performance GP (kg), F/D (kg) 160 F/D GP MBW MBW (g) DOC (days)

14 Floc Development Floc (ml/l) Average Floc Development Floc DOC (days)

15 Environment & )9:/#"$" )9:/#"$"."." " # $" " # $" 5#$ #"$ ;#"$ ;""< /#;<$#"$ " 8 ( 6 6 (7 6( (( ": ( 67 2' ' 7 '6 8 <. <#"$ ' 7 <9 <#"$ 9 ' #"$ #",0 $ '

16 Trials - Performance Description Dens (pcs/m2) DOC (day) MBW (g) Earthen Full- HDPE Semi- HDPE Prod (MT/Ha) SR (%) FCR ADG (g/day) DOC (day) SR (%) FCR ADG (g/day) 0 MBW (g) Prod (MT/Ha)

17 First Commercial Trial ;) / #$;'8 #$;'6 #$;'2 #$;' #$ ;( 7=;'8 ;)/ ( 8 6 ( 8 5#," $ 9#$ '2 '8 ( '8 '8 '6 "#/$ = 6 =(26 =8( =228 =(8 =22!@#/$ ' *#> $ ' 82 ' #-3$ ' #?3$ ' 6 5#>$ ( 7(7 ;3#/,$ #/,", $ =86 =2 = =66 =( =68 *** Semi HDPE ponds (R&D, CPI and CCP, CPB, 2003)

18 Commercial Performance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

19 Production Performance TD - R&D, Trail & Commercial 40.0 Floc System Production R&D, Trial and Company Commercial Ponds Period Number of pond < 2,0 2,0-2,4 2,5-3,0 3,0-3,5 3,5-4,0 4,0-4,9 5,0-5,9 6,0-6,9 7,0-7,9 8,0-8,9 9,0-9,9 10,0-10,9 11,0-11,9 >12.0 Production range (kg/5000m 2) R&D. Density pcs/m2, M BW g, Biomass kg, SR 81.7 %, FCR 1.29 (number of ponds = 46) TRIAL. Density 140 pcs/m2, M BW g, Biomass kg, SR 87.0 %, FCR 1.42 (number of ponds = 13) CCP. Density 130 pcs/m2 (standard), M BW g, Biomass kg, SR 85.5 %, FCR 1.21 (number of ponds = 131)

20 Production Efficiency Efficiency: Increased from 9.0 MT to 21.8 MT/ ha pond. Carrying capacity: Increased from 430 kgs to 680 kgs/hp (PWA) % < MT/0.5ha >12.0 B. Flocs S-HDPE N. Density Full-HDPE H. Density Earth N. Density S-HDPE N. Density Earth N. Density Earth N. Density S-HDPE H. Density Earth N. Density Full-HDPE B. Flocs S-HDPE 789:( *

21 Carrying Capacity Pond type & system (L. vannamei) "' Kgs/HP ND Earth(CP) HD Earth(CP) HD S-HDPE(CP) HD HDPE(Trial) Floc S-HDPE (CP) System (normal, high density & floc) & types of pond (earthen & HDPE) 789:( *

22 Advantages/ Disadvantages ;)/ - ) /# " D :/1 > :/ # /$E(-> % "" '5 "B%// %%/ "" (1%#3$ 8 % (-> )/./ /1 2., 1":"" "#% B $.41""""-.4 '/" %" )1

23 :6 Technology Development Team <- # "$ 5 /- 5"5. - =!. 41 = /@ 1 "" =

24 References /; 6< "%:6; 5 ; 6%3% ;& ;)$,("*"", /; 6< "' )5:5=; ; ) ;& (.-9 0> % 5/" 9: "%46')>?;;) ; %3% ;& ;)$,(*&"@& 9: "%> ;& (.- 9 0> %5/&% 9: ) "%: ;5) ) ;& (. -9 0> %5/&-% )9:%3?8/))1 "% 5A%; 6 ( 5* ;& (.-9 0> % 5/% 789:( *?5 55B6 46 > > % 3%;& ;)$(*