Analysis of the efficiency of financial support for agriculture in China under. the DEA model

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Analysis of the efficiency of financial support for agriculture in China under. the DEA model"

Transcription

1 2d Iteratoal Coferece o Socal Scece ad Techology Educato (ICSSTE 2016) Aalyss of the effcecy of facal support for agrculture Cha uder the DEA model L Qu Wag Chu-pg* Sheyag Agrcultural Uversty Sheyag, Laog, Laog Shhua uversty Fushu, Laog, Sheyag Agrcultural Uversty Sheyag, Laog, *Correspodg author Abstract The developmet ad growth of moder agrculture ca ot be separated from the govermet, polcy support, especally facal support. There s a huge cotradcto betwee lmted facal resources ad agrcultural expedture, f agrcultural producto reles o the expaso of the scale of fscal expedture, t s ot a permaet soluto. Therefore, t s very mportat to mprove the effcecy of facal expedture o agrculture, whch s a mportat way to promote the rapd developmet of agrcultural ecoomy ad ease the cotradcto betwee supply ad demad of rural face. developmet s slow, t s dffcult to support moder agrcultural developmet eeds, whch makes the farmers come crease slowly ad the agrcultural dustry system, producto maagemet become a bg problem. The soluto of these problems requres the govermet to stregthe the terveto ad mateace of agrculture, through facal support ad promote the stable growth of the rural ecoomy. 2. DEA model aalyss DEA, also kow as data evelopmet aalyss (Evel Aalyss Data), proposed by Chares Cooper, Rhodes 1978, s a relatve effcecy evaluato of the o- parametrc programmg method. Sce 2007, Cha's fscal expedture statstcs occurred huge chage, for facal support to the vestmet amout was ot dsclosure publc, so scale effcecy ad use effcecy, geerally used total fscal expedture of provce as put dcators, ad showed as expedture of fscal expedture agrculture, forestry, water coservacy clmate; ad structure effcecy eed of facal support for agrculture expedtures as put dcators, cludg support for the cost of farm producto expeses ad varous agrcultural Keywords-DEA model, Cha, Facal support for agrculture, Fud effcecy, Evaluato. 1. INTRODUCTION As the restrcto of loger cycle of agrcultural producto, the captal turover s slow, the beeft s ot oly affected by atural codtos, but also by the market prce fluctuato. Therefore, compared wth other dustres, agrcultural rsk ad at- rsk ablty are weak. Our coutry s a large agrcultural coutry, the agrcultural developmet of Cha's ecoomc costructo has mportat fluece. Although all aspects, Cha's agrcultural output has great mprovemet, but because of the frastructure, publc utltes ad other The authors - Publshed by Atlats Press 623

2 udertakgs, rural developmet expedtures, ad breedg, agrcultural machery, agrcultural ad food subsdes. Spedg property subject geerally selects the represetatve agrcultural producto developmet of agrculture, forestry, amal husbadry ad fshery as the gross output value dex. DEA model s as follows: t m[ e s. S.t. 1 1 y s t e s y ; 1; 0; s 0 1 s 0; s 0 x I the model, deotes the umber of the decso makg uts, effcecy of decso makg uts value, sad weght coeffcet. Ad X, Y sad the decso ut of put ad output value ad S + put or output dex of relaxato degree. If =1, s-=0, s+=0, s that the decso makg uts to acheve the DEA effectve codto; f =1, but s = 0 ad S + = 0, s that the decso makg ut s weak DEA effcet; o the cotrary, DEA s vald. I geeral, the operato effcecy of the fuds of facal agrculture, maly by the techcal effcecy, total factor productvty, scale 0 effcecy of three kds of effcecy value to be assessed to determe [1]. Amog them, the rato of techcal effcecy ad pure techcal effcecy equals to ecoomes of scale; the rato of techcal effcecy ad total factor productvty equals to the progress of scece ad techology; the product of pure techcal effcecy, scale effcecy, the progress of scece equals to total factor productvty. 3. Evaluato o the effcecy of facal support for agrculture Cha 3.1 Basc treds Relevat statstcs, 2004, the effcecy of fscal support for agrculture Cha, reached the peak at 1.009,2007 ad reached at trough. From 2000 to 2007, the perod from the Natoal Facal Fud for Agrculture effcecy was dowward tred, dcatg that the utlzato of facal resources dd ot crease wth the rse of atoal vestmet [2]. From the table we ca see that although durg the last eght years, our coutry face for supportg agrculture fud creased year by year, but the fuds utlzato rate has ot rse, o the oe had llustrates the Cha fscal agrcultural supportg polcy system, vestmet structure s ot reasoable. Its captal usg effcecy dex chage as table 1: dex year Table 1: the chage of Cha's fscal expedture for agrculture use effcecy dex: Techcal effcecy Pure techcal effcecy Scetfc ad techologcal Scale beeft Total factor productvty average

3 3.2 Facal support ad agrcultural developmet Moder agrculture has attached greater mportace to agrcultural products output qualty ad agrcultural scece ad techology ovato, resource coservato. Cha's facal support s requred for agrcultural developmet expedtures for fscal expedture for agrculture. From the pot of vew of academa ad the practce departmets, the fscal expedture for agrculture statstcal pots for the broad ad arrow sese. The arrow fscal agrcultural expedture cludes fud spedg o agrcultural producto, agrculture, forestry, water coservacy, meteorologcal servce expedture, expedture for comprehesve developmet of agrculture, agrcultural frastructure expedture, agrcultural scece ad techology expeses; ad geeral fscal agrcultural expedture s maly refers to the arrow brach of a coupled wth fscal fuds, ad through other drect ways for agrculture to support ad subsdes. 3.3 Evaluato ad effcecy of facal expedture o Agrculture Effcecy of fscal expedture for agrculture s maly refers to the comparsos betwee the govermet agrcultural developmet face put ad agrcultural output effcecy, ts mplct fscal agrcultural expedture of fuds of the ru cofgurato s effcet ad scetfc ratoalty, ts effcecy s geerally dvded to structural effcecy, scale effcecy ad effects of rate of the three major categores. I geeral, fscal agrculture expedture effcecy evaluato maly coducted two ways. Oe s through the establshmet of producto fucto, estmatg elastcty of output to expedture effcecy evaluato. Usually, expedture elastcty coeffcet s bgger, effcecy s hgher. Evaluato wth regresso coeffcets of quas method for measuremet ad calculato of output elastcty, come regresso coeffcets to represet the expedture elastcty. Output elastcty evaluato mechasm s maly used for the effcecy evaluato of the expedture structure. Secod relatve effcecy evaluato method. Ths method s by calculatg the relatve effcecy of the dfferet uts of the same ature to carry o the comparso ad aalyss. The method ca be used to measure a varety of agrcultural expedture effcecy, cludg structural effcecy, scale effcecy, usage effcecy. I recet years, DEA model, use more, ths way of data requremets relatvely low to mult output o the subject of vestmet ad vestmet effcecy evaluato. Evaluato of fscal agrculture expedture effcecy dcators used ca be dvded to two categores, amely put dcators, output dcators. The put dex s to support agrcultural developmet of facal expedture structure, expedture scale; output dcators for agrcultural Gross dustral output value, platg area, per capta come of farmers 3.4 Evaluato of the effcecy of domestc facal expedture o Agrculture Sce the 1980s, Lucas, Romer represetatve ecoomsts, based o the ew classcal ecoomc growth, bega to work o atoal ecoomc sustaed growth by ecoomc system edogeous varables fluece, ths s the edogeous ecoomc growth theory. The edogeous ecoomc growth theory to the populato growth rate, savgs rate, 625

4 techologcal progress see as affectg ecoomc growth varable. I raw ecoomc growth model s assumed costat margal returs to captal, the captal project cludes the developmet of huma captal, materal captal, kowledge accumulato for parets of a coutry's ecoomc growth trsc motvato, these varables wth geeral has a strog exteralty, publc product characterstcs. 4. Research coclusos ad polcy recommedatos 4.1 Coclusos of the study Domestc agrcultural developmet goal s to realze the costructo of agrcultural moderzato, but to acheve the costructo of agrcultural moderzato, eed the govermet's facal support. I recet years, the domestc ecoomy s relatvely slow growth, fscal reveue growth also tha weak. I addto, facal operato s about to eter the perod of cotracto, f oly to rely o fscal agrcultural expedture, for rural ecoomc developmet s extremely ufavorable, whch requres from the mprovemet of the effcecy the use of fuds to beg. Through the practce certfcates, the effcecy of our domestc facal support for agrculture s ot optmstc, regardless of s from the developmet stuato of the varous provces, or from the pot of vew of the regoal average, wdespread loss of effcecy, the loss of the stuato, especally the pure techology effcecy loss s more serous 4.2 Polcy recommedatos Icrease facal support agrculture vestmet, the reasoable cotrol of agrculture fuds. Frst of all, the domestc facal sector should cotue to crease the put of fuds for supportg agrculture, ad the establshmet of agrcultural vestmet legal orms to esure fscal vestmet growth speed ad scale. I the secod place, the eed for domestc regoal facal vestmet s ot balaced, the trasfer paymet system to mprove ad the area betwee the ratoal allocato of fscal agrcultural expedture of fuds, as far as possble to mprove the overall fscal agrculture fud sze ad effcecy. Especally the wester rego, eed to crease the support of facal support for agrculture, of agrculture related fuds supportg mechasm reform, the decrease of developed areas supportg pressure [3] Optmzato ad upgradg of the fscal agrculture expedture structure, effectvely ehace the structure effcecy the use of fuds. I domestc facal fuds for agrculture expedture, agrcultural machery, food, crops ad agrcultural subsdes expedture effcecy s relatvely hgh, ad t s a creasg stage of returs to scale, so t should crease the expedture proporto, the more agrcultural projects belog to the scope of facal subsdes. I addto, but also to buld accurate put mechasm, crease subsdes to accuracy, guaratee fuds effectvely ssued, order to mprove the effcecy of the fuds of facal agrculture put. Ad to rural socal developmet expedture ad support agrcultural producto expedture ad the Idustry fees ad eed to reduce o-productve expedture, crease the productve expedture ad crease rural basc publc servce vestmet ad agrcultural frastructure costructo, reduce admstratve expeses, crease the promoto ad ovato of scece ad techology expedture, so as to optmze the fuds of facal agrculture expedture structure. 626

5 4.2.3 To mprove our coutry face supportg agrculture fud supervso mechasm ad our coutry's fscal agrculture fud use effcecy, we eed to stregthe the supervso ad cotrol of fuds from varous aspects: effectvely mprove the structure of captal allocato ad use effcecy combed wth the ew budget law, perfect our coutry agrculture face pre calculate regulatory mechasms, formed beforehad, coduct supervso, mprove supervso effcecy of the facal fuds for agrculture. I addto, t s ecessary to mprove the fscal fuds of the tegrato mechasm to effectvely reduce the waste of moey. 5. Cocluso Altogether, the developmet of agrcultural producto, s separable from the support of atoal face. I order to mprove the facal supportg agrculture fuds use effcecy, t s ecessary to make aalyss ad evaluato o the varous factors, through the adjustmet of the polcy ad regulatory captal whereabouts, effectvely mprove the utlzato effcecy of the facal fuds for agrculture ad promotg moder agrculture wll cotue to grow. Refereces [1] L Gula Wag Da. Performace evaluato of facal support for agrculture couty level based o, DEA etrepreeur world, vol.9, pp.95-97, [2] Huag Qghua, We Xaoya. Performace evaluato of facal support for agrculture Guzhou Provce Based o DEA two respose model, Joural of agrcultural machery, vol.34:01, pp , [3] Jag Sog, Cao Zhegl. Coordato effcecy ad evoluto of facal support for agrculture Cha, soft scece, vol.02:27, pp.6-11, [4] Wag Dgxag, Ju Ljua. Measure the effcecy of face support for agrculture of our coutry ad mprovemet strateges, Cotemporary ecoomc research, vol.11, pp.62-69, [5] Wag Xao, Zhag Q. The effcecy of facal support for agrculture Ztog Couty of Mayag cty based o DEA model, Tmes face, vol.05:15, pp ,