LUWU UTARA DISTRICT. 30. Makawa. 31. Lamasi, Sekka. 29. Padang Alipan. 27.Padang Sappa. 28. Bajo. Padangsappa. B o n e B a y. Bajo. Belopa.

Transcription

1 LUWU UTR ISTRICT N Location of istrict CENTRL SULWESI SOUTHEST SULWESI Lamasi PRE-PRE TN TORJ ISTRICT Watenrang Batuputih PLOPO Beringinjaya Padangkalua 3. Makawa 31. Lamasi, Sekka 29. Padang lipan UJUNG PNNG LEGEN SOUTH SULWESI PROVINCE Capital Town of istrict Bua LUWU ISTRICT Ponrang Beuma 27.Padang Sappa 28. Bajo Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Sub-istrict Boundary Provincial Road ENREKNG ISTRICT Padangsappa B o n e B a y istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Bajo Belopa Lempokasi Cimpu Larompong Name of Scheme Technical Irrigation Semi-Technical Irrigation Non-Technical Irrigation Irrigation Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) SIRP ISTRICT 5 1Km 27. Padang Sappa 28. Bajo 29. Pagang lipan 3. Makawa 31. Lamasi Kanan 12,588 7, 1,2 1,775 5,485 T ST T NT T 1,889 6, , 5,17 WJO ISTRICT SCLE The Study on Comprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International Cooperation gency T : Technical Irrigation ST : Semi-Technical Irrigation NT : Non-Technical Irrigation Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Luwu istrict

2 27. Padang Sappa Scheme (1/4) I. PROJECT FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) Code Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,5 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Padang Sappa (8) Water Resource River : Noling (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Luwu (9) Catchment rea (km 2 ) : 783 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Bupon (1) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1985 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 12,588 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram B e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender h. WUs data C 33 II.1 Present and Planned Land Use a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland Field d. Uncultivated Land e. Non-irrigable Total II. SUBJECT RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) 4,881 9,687 4,86 2, -2, 4,8-4,8 1,22 1,22 1,889 1,889 III. GRICULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 4,711 4,711 97% 4. 23,844 1,2 Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) 3,816 3,816 78% ,172 1, Total/nnual 8,527 8, % ,16 11,2 1/: Irrigated & rainfed paddy & palawija (2) and Constraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances attained in irrigated area; existing extensive rainfed field (2,ha) & upland field (4,8ha) - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the irrigated areas; paddy yield levels low to moderate; extensive rainfed paddy & upland field B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JIC Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: No collaboration among KTs - Paddy Marketing Limited bargaining power of farmers - Extension Services: Extension activities of PPLs are limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area through rehabilitation & upgrading - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season II - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop Production Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Season Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 9,687 9,687 1% 5. 48,435 % 4, ,813 6% ,642 4,845 14, ,5 16% ,77 4,845 6, ,973-15% 1. 34,61-6,175 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 6 b. Established; 56 c. Not yet; 4 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 9 b. Under developing; 31 c. Not yet; 6 Not yet registered 56 (2) and Constraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) Causes of and Constraints - Less attention to WU establishment among farmers. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures - Encouragement of farmers to make themselves possitive in utilization of irrigation system. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowerment training. 3-15

3 27. Padang Sappa Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FCILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : C (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main Canal System : Secondary Canal System : On-farm : C (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 5 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not c. Length of weir : 16 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 15.1 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection Road Canal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 3,867 6,297 1,164 Secondary 5,156 42,84 47,96 (nos) (4) Major and Constrains Inflow of bed loads into canal and decrease canal flow capacity Inspection road (m) 1,676 4,776 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Impassable of inspection road along canal ifficulty on maintenance of earth canal (5) Causes of Major and Constraints Insufficient function of settling basin, no proper gate operation of intake during flood Insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal Fallen down and collapse of side slope, water plants or weed at inside of canal V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Rehabilitation of settling basin, proper gate operation of intake during flood Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of concrete lining (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation Canal and Related Works No rehabilitation Rehabilitation New construction Total Canal (m) Main 8,843 8,843 Secondary 41,725 41,725 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 4,881 d. Non-potential paddy field 2, b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field 4,8 c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,889 (5) Rehabilitation Cost (irect Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project Cost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,85 96,274 9,627 35,672 3,6 148, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 12.6% VI. PROJECT EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

4 27. Padang Sappa Scheme (3/4) Scheme Padang Sappa istrict Luwu Technical Level Technical Registered rea 12,588 ha Year of Construction 1985 Irrigation (Headworks) Fixed Weir, Intake B C Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake; leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength against design load due to rust, decay of steel material; problem on management due to lack of periodically maintenance Irrigation Canal Masonry Lined Canal B C Sedimentation; leakage from lined canal; crack on lined canal; deflection of lining toward inside of canal; less maintenance; and no inspection road. Irrigation (Main Canal) Earth Canal B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-17

5 27. Padang Sappa Scheme (4/4) Scheme Padang Sappa istrict Luwu Technical Level Technical Registered rea 12,588 ha Year of Construction 1985 Irrigation (Secondary Canal) Check B C amage on structure; lower function of check structure due to deflection of structure; physical operation problem on structure; deterioration of gate; sedimentation at inside of canal. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Paddy Cultivation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Harvesting and Treshering B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-18

6 28. Bajo Scheme (1/4) I. PROJECT FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) Code Number : (7) Number of Farmers 5,35 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Bajo (8) Water Resource River : Sungai Bajo (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Luwu (9) Catchment rea (km 2 ) : 316 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Bajo, Belopa (1) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 197 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 7, (6) Technical Level : Semi Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram B e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender h. WUs data C 16 II.1 Present and Planned Land Use a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland Field d. Uncultivated Land e. Non-irrigable Total II. SUBJECT RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) 5,466 6, ,462 6,462 III. GRICULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 5,466 5,466 1% 4. 24,354 Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) 4,22 4,22 77% , Total/nnual 9,668 9, % , /: Irrigated & rainfed paddy & palawija (2) and Constraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances attained in irrigated area; existing of extensive rainfed field (996ha) - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the irrigated areas; paddy yield levels low to moderate; extensive rainfed paddy field B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JIC Study - Irrigation & rainage: Flooding - Palawija Marketing: Poor quality of products - gronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area through rehabilitation & upgrading - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season II - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 6,462 6,462 1% 5. 32,31 Season II (dry I) % Season III (dry II) 5, ,462 1% ,988 3,23 Total/nnual 12, ,924 2% ,298 3,23 nnual Increment 2, ,256 23% 1. 21,35 2,732 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 69 b. Established; 23 c. Not yet; 46 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 19 c. Not yet; 4 Not yet registered 25 (2) and Constraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) Causes of and Constraints - No management system in WU. - Less attention to O&M works among WU members. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures - Encouragement of farmers to organize WU and Federation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowerment training. 3-19

7 28. Bajo Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FCILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : Secondary Canal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : C b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not c. Length of weir : 62 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8.4 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection Road Canal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 5 1,6 2,1 Secondary 47,275 47,275 (nos) Inspection road (m) (4) Major and Constrains Crack or damage on weir crest Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Physical operational problem on intake gate(s) Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) Causes of Major and Constraints Collision of foreign materials against weir crest, low quality of concrete/masonry Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Repair of weir crest by cement/chemical grouting or filling concrete Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Replacement of intake gate(s) Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation Canal and Related Works No rehabilitation Rehabilitation New construction Total Canal (m) Main 2,1 21 2,31 Secondary 47,275 9,455 56,73 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 5,466 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 996 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 6,462 (5) Rehabilitation Cost (irect Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project Cost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 4,56 89,79 8,98 13,758 2,59 118, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) 5 8 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) VI.1 EIRR 13.5% VI. PROJECT EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group V: cceralation of WUs establishment VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

8 28. Bajo Scheme (3/4) Scheme Bajo istrict Luwu Technical Level Semi-technical Registered rea 7, ha Year of Construction 197 Irrigation (Headworks) Fixed Weir B C Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body; deflection of pier of weir. Irrigation (Headworks) Scouring Sluice Gate B C Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake; leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength against design load due to rust, decay of steel material; problem on management due to lack of periodically maintenance Irrigation (Main Canal) ivision B C Lower function of division structure due to sedimentation in front gate; physical operation problem on structure; deterioration of gates. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-111

9 28. Bajo Scheme (4/4) Scheme Bajo istrict Luwu Technical Level Semi-technical Registered rea 7, ha Year of Construction Irrigation (Secondary Canal) Earth Canal 197 B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Land Preparation by Hand Tractor B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Paddy Cultivation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-112

10 29. Pagang lipan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJECT FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) Code Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 8 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Pagang lipan (8) Water Resource River : Sungai Battang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Luwu Selatan (9) Catchment rea (km 2 ) : 115 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Walenrang (1) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1975/1977 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,2 (6) Technical Level : Semi Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram B B e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender h. WUs data C 6 II.1 Present and Planned Land Use a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland Field d. Uncultivated Land e. Non-irrigable Total II. SUBJECT RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) III. GRICULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) % 4. 3,18 Season II (dry I) % 4. 2,588 Season III (dry II) Total/nnual 1,442 1, % 4. 5,768 (2) and Constraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances attained; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate to high; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JIC Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Economic activities are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Extension activities of PPLs are limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - ouble cropping of paddy in the entire scheme; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season II - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop Production Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Season Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment % 5. 3, % 5. 3, % 1,195 1, ,829 23% 5. 7,95 1, % 1. 2,182 1,195 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 6 c. Not yet; 5 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 6 c. Not yet; 6 Not yet registered 6 (2) and Constraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) Causes of and Constraints - No management system in WU and no coordination with istrict WRS. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures - Calling attention of farmers and public servants to irrigation system utilization. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowerment training. - Capacity training of istrict WRS staff

11 29. Pagang lipan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FCILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : C (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main Canal System : Secondary Canal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not c. Length of weir : 36 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 2.4 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection Road Canal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 375 1,281 1,656 Secondary 3,785 2,224 6,9 (nos) (4) Major and Constrains Fallen down, inclined, or washed away of retaining wall of weir Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Physical operational problem on intake gate(s) Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 1,656 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Causes of Major and Constraints Insufficient quality of concrete or masonry material, over acting earth pressure more than design Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Reconstruction of retaining wall of weir Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Replacement of intake gate(s) Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation Canal and Related Works No rehabilitation Rehabilitation New construction Total Canal (m) Main 1, ,22 Secondary 3, ,759 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 795 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 795 (5) Rehabilitation Cost (irect Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project Cost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,476 7, ,63 1,26 12, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 17.5% VI. PROJECT EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group VI: evelopment by other category VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province - (Subject area is less than 1, ha) 3-114

12 29. Pagang lipan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Pagang lipan istrict Luwu Technical Level Semi-technical Registered rea 1,2 ha Year of Construction 1977 Irrigation (Headworks) Fixed Weir B C Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body; deflection of pier of weir. Irrigation Canal Earth Canal B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. Irrigation (Main Canal) ivision B C Totally damaged : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-115

13 29. Pagang lipan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Pagang lipan istrict Luwu Technical Level Semi-technical Registered rea 1,2 ha Year of Construction Irrigation (Secondary Canal) Earth Canal 1977 B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Paddy Cultivation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. griculture, On-Farm Farm Road and rainage Canal B C : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-116

14 3. Makawa Scheme (1/4) I. PROJECT FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) Code Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 765 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Makawa (8) Water Resource River : Sungai Makawa (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Luwu Selatan (9) Catchment rea (km 2 ) : 18 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Walenrang (1) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1969/1971 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,775 (6) Technical Level : Non Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram B e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender h. WUs data C 5 II.1 Present and Planned Land Use a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland Field d. Uncultivated Land e. Non-irrigable Total II. SUBJECT RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) 88 1, , 1, III. GRICULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) % 4. 3,54 Season II (dry I) % 4. 2,4 Season III (dry II) 6 Total/nnual 1,41 1,41 16% 4. 5,94 6 1/: Irrigated & rainfed paddy & palawija (2) and Constraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Substantial irrigation performances attained irrigated area; existing of rainfed field (12ha) - ouble cropping of paddy introduced; paddy yield levels still low ; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JIC Study - Irrigation & rainage: Flooding - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Extension activities of PPLs are limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation & upgrading - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season I - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop Production Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Season Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1, 1, 1% 5. 5, 8 2 1, 1% 5. 4, 1, % 1,8 2 2, 2% 5. 9, 1, % 1. 3,6 94 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 1 c. Not yet; 1 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 1 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 1 (2) and Constraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) Causes of and Constraints - No management system in WU and no coordination with istrict WRS. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures - Calling attention of farmers and public servants to WU establishment. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowermwnt training. - Capacity building of istrict WRS staff

15 3. Makawa Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FCILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : Secondary Canal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : C b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not c. Length of weir : 6 m g. Settling basin : not provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.1 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection Road Canal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 1,761 1,539 3,3 Secondary 1,231 2,229 3,46 (nos) (4) Major and Constrains Incline, settlement, or deflection of pier of weir Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Physical operational problem on intake gate(s) Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Causes of Major and Constraints Insufficient strength of weir foundation or not enough foundation treatment Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf No provision of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Reconstruction of pier of weir Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Replacement of intake gate(s) Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : replacement or new Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation Canal and Related Works No rehabilitation Rehabilitation New construction Total Canal (m) Main 1, ,218 Secondary 1, ,96 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 88 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 12 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1, (5) Rehabilitation Cost (irect Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project Cost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,593 8, ,112 1,26 15, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 16.6% VI. PROJECT EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group V: cceralation of WUs establishment VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

16 3. Makawa Scheme (3/4) Scheme Makawa istrict Luwu Technical Level Non-technical Registered rea 1,775 ha Year of Construction 1971/81 Irrigation (Main Canal) ivision B C Lower function of division structure due to sedimentation in front gate; physical operation problem on structure. Irrigation (Secondary Canal) Masonry Lined Canal B C Sedimentation; leakage from lined canal; crack on lined canal; deflection of lining toward inside of canal; less maintenance; and no inspection road. Irrigation (Secondary Canal) Earth Canal B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-119

17 3. Makawa Scheme (4/4) Scheme Makawa istrict Luwu Technical Level Non-technical Registered rea 1,775 ha Year of Construction Irrigation (Secondary Canal) ivision 1971/81 B C Lower function of division structure due to sedimentation in front gate; physical operation problem on structure. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Land Preparation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Rainfed Paddy Cultivation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-12

18 31. Lamasi Kanan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJECT FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) Code Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,39 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Lamasi Kanan (8) Water Resource River : Lamasi (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Luwu (9) Catchment rea (km 2 ) : 35 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Walenrang (1) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1979/1983 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 5,485 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender h. WUs data C 2 II.1 Present and Planned Land Use a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland Field d. Uncultivated Land e. Non-irrigable Total II. SUBJECT RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) 4,29 5, ,17 5,17 III. GRICULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production Season Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 4,29 4,29 1% 4. 19,165 Season II (dry I) 3,647 3,647 85% 4. 14,588 Season III (dry II) % 4 Total/nnual 7,937 7, % 4. 33, /: Irrigated & rainfed paddy & palawija (2) and Constraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances attained; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels still low; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JIC Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Unstable marketing prices - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Shortage of operation funds of PPLs III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season I - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop Production Cropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield Crop Production (ton) Season Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 5,147 5,147 1% 5. 25,735 4, ,147 1% 5. 21,875 3,86 % 9, ,294 2% 5. 47,61 3,86 1, ,357 15% 1. 13,857 3,46 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 11 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 11 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 11 (2) and Constraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) Causes of and Constraints - No attention to O&M among WU members. - No coordination with istrict WRS office. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures - Calling attention of farmers and public servants to irrigation system utilization. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowermwnt training. - Capacity building of istrict WRS staff

19 31. Lamasi Kanan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FCILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : Secondary Canal System : On-farm : C (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : C b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not c. Length of weir : 8 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 7.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection Road Canal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 11,9 1,87 12,879 Secondary 32,928 32,928 (nos) Inspection road (m) 11,279 5,7 (4) Major and Constrains Settlement or breakdown of stilling basin of weir Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Physical operational problem on intake gate(s) Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Impassable of inspection road along canal Overage, lower strength of canal ifficulty on maintenance of earth canal ifficulty on O&M (5) Causes of Major and Constraints Insufficient strength of weir foundation, not enough foundation treatment, or insufficient length of stilling basin Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Fallen down and collapse of side slope, water plants or weed at inside of canal No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Reconstruction of stilling basin of weir Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Replacement of intake gate(s) Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Replace and reconstruction of canal Provision of concrete lining Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation Canal and Related Works No rehabilitation Rehabilitation New construction Total Canal (m) Main 12,879 12,879 Secondary 32,928 32,928 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 4,29 d. Non-potential paddy field 398 b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 44 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field 78 Total 5,17 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation Cost (irect Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project Cost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,81 74,889 7,489 11,249 2,59 99, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 11.6% VI. PROJECT EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

20 31. Lamasi Kanan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Lamasi Kanan istrict Luwu Technical Level Technical Registered rea 5,485 ha Year of Construction 1979/83 Irrigation (Headworks) Fixed Weir B C Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body; deflection of pier of weir; rock sedimentation at weir. Irrigation (Headworks) Intake B C Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake; leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength against design load due to rust, decay of steel material; problem on management due to lack of periodically maintenance Irrigation (Main Canal) Earth Canal B C Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal; difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspection road. : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-123

21 31. Lamasi Kanan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Lamasi Kanan istrict Luwu Technical Level Technical Registered rea 5,485 ha Year of Construction Irrigation (Main Canal) rop 1979/83 B C Sedimentation at inside of canal; clogging of drop structure. griculture, On-Farm ctivity Paddy Cultivation B C Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads. Post-harvest Facility ctivity Storage & rying Yard B C : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-124