The SFIS project - Specialty Feed Ingredients contribu.ng to Livestock Sustainability

Transcription

1 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY The SFIS project - Specialty Feed Ingredients contribu.ng to Livestock Sustainability General Project Presenta.on at the 5 th Global Feed & Food Congress 216 Presenta.on by Dr. Michael Binder, Chairman Technical Board of the SFIS Project, and Joerg Seifert, FEFANA

2 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY The SFIS- Project - Specialty Feed Ingredients contribu.ng to Livestock Sustainability Dr. Michael Binder Director Sustainability Development at Evonik Industries Chairman Technical Board SFIS Project

3 Contents About SFIs & FEFANA The Project The Project Partners The Scientific Council The Concept Results Summary 2

4 Specialty Feed Ingredients place in the feed & food chain 4

5 Specialty Feed Ingredients: Small volume, big role! 5

6 About FEFANA The EU AssociaDon represendng the industry of Speciality Feed Ingredients and their Mixtures Most categories of Feed Addi.ves and Feed Materials used for other purpose than basic nutri.on (func.onal feed ingredients), about 1 companies, from mul.na.onals to SMEs: producers, traders, premixers : about 85% are SMEs, Promo.ng, defending and represen.ng the common and general interest of our industry, linking industry with EU & na.onal authori.es 6

7 The global SFIS Project World scale project reflecting the different feeding technologies of the 3 regions to show the specific improvement potential North America Europe South America 7

8 The SFIS Project Partners AssociaDons: IFIF FEFANA AFIA JFMA Sindiracoes Full Members: Adisseo France SAS ADM Ajinomoto BASF SE DSM Nutri.onal Products Ltd. Evonik Nutri.on and Care GmbH Novus Europe S.A./N.V. AB Vista Dupont Industrial Biosciences Observers: Alltech Nutreco Taminco InVivo Consulted by: Thinskstep and a ScienDfic Council 8

9 The SFIS Scien.fic Council ScienDfic Experts: Field of experdse MaKhias Finkbeiner Expert on ISO harmonisation for LCA methodologies; expert on product LCAs Jean-Yves Dourmad Swine nutri.onist; coordinator of the French working group CORPEN on feed formula.on modula.on for environment improvement John Pluske Expert on animal nutri.on and diges.ve physiology of pigs and other monogastric animals Ermias Kebreab Expert on animal nutri.on with a whole system approach to quan.fy GHG emissions in agriculture combined with the development of energy and nutrient u.lisa.on models in caale, swine and poultry Kees de Lange Expert on nutrient metabolism and u.lisa.on especially in pigs. Aspects of his work are ingredients evalua.on to minimize environmental impacts of pig produc.on Gustavo Lima Expert in Nutri.on 9

10 The SFIS Project Boundaries World scale LCA study investigating the effect of amino acids and phytase in pig and poultry feed from cradle to farm exit gate 1

11 The Func.onal Unit and Feed Composi.on Comparison of the different scenarios is done on basis of 1 kg of animal live weight (Func.onal Unit) Un-supplemented diets (Basic Feed) represent the negative control for pigs and poultry, compared with supplemented either only with amino acids (Feed+AA) or with amino acids and phytase (Feed+AA+Phy) Pigs Poultry Basic Feed Feed+AA Feed+AA +Phy Basic Feed Feed+AA Feed+AA +Phy Lysine Lysine Lysine Lysine Methionine Methionine Methionine Methionine Threonine Threonine Threonine Threonine Tryptophan Tryptophan Phytase Phytase 11

12 The Impact Categories Following the rules of ISO 1444:26, the applicant can select the impact categories, which are the most relevant ones specific for the products or processes under investigation Impact Categories Life Cycle Inventory Parameters Global Warming Poten.al (GWP) CO 2, N 2 O, CH 4 Acidifica.on Poten.al (AP) NO x, NH 3, SO 2, HCl, HF Kg CO 2 -e/fu Kg SO 2 -e/fu Eutrophica.on Poten.al (EP) NH 3, NO 2, COD N & P compounds Kg PO e/fu 12

13 The Improvement Poten.al To show the importance of the feed conversion ratio (FCR) as a key driver in animal growth and environmental performance different assumptions have been made. Based on the composition of the negative control (Basic Feed) a theoretically decreased feed efficiency was assumed (High FCR) Based on the composition of the technically optimized feed (Feed+AA+Phy) a theoretically better feed con-version ratio was assumed (Low FCR) 13

14 SFIS Results: GWP for Poultry - Europe Using amino acids and phytase (Feed+AA+Phy) reduces the GWP compared to the non-supplemented negative control (Basic Feed) Basic Feed Poultry Feed+AA +Phy % 5 25 Lysine Methionine GWP Threonine Basic Feed Feed+AA+Phy Phytase 14

15 SFIS Results: GWP with Land Use Change (LUC) for Poultry - Europe Consideration of Land Use Change (LUC) shows additional advantages of more than 5% for the supplemented alternative. % Basic Feed Poultry Feed+AA +Phy 25 Basic Feed GWP (with LUC) Feed+AA+Phy Lysine Methionine Threonine Phytase 15

16 Results EP and AP - Poultry Europe Reduction potential for Eutrophication (EP) and Acidification (AP) are significant due to supplementation of amino acids and phytases. % Basic Feed Poultry Feed+AA +Phy 25 Lysine Methionine EP AP Threonine Basic Feed Feed+AA+Phy Phytase 16

17 Sensi.vity Analysis FCR - Europe Addi.onally improved feed conversion ra.o for pigs and broilers for the supplemented diets shows clearly addi.onal benefits for all 3 impact categories under inves.ga.on compared to the reference scenario. Considering Land Use Change (LUC) further improves the reduc.on poten.al. Pigs Poultry High FCR Low FCR High FCR Low FCR % % 4 4 GWP GWP (with LUC) EP AP GWP GWP (with LUC) EP AP 17

18 Summary 1. Supplementa.on of SFIs improves environmental performance for pigs and poultry produc.on systems - independent of the regional technologies 2. Important drivers for improvements are: Feed conversion ra.o Difference in the use of basic feed ingredients due to the supplementa.on of SFIs in scenarios 18

19 Summary 3. Assessment of manure management must be seen cri.cal due to specific regional condi.ons (surplus/lack of N and P) 4. Showing further the effects of use of phytase would require to adapt the model for the eutrophica.on poten.al. 19

20 Publically Available Material Journal of Animal Science 2

21 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Thank you for your attention! Dr. Michael Binder 21

22 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Further informa.on Back-up Slides 22

23 Sensi.vity Analysis - FCR Pigs Poultry P Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Ingredients Ingredients Ingredients Ingredients High FCR Basic FCR High FCR Basic FCR Feed+AA+Phy Pigs Poultry Feed+AA +Phy3.1 Feed+AA+Phy Feed+AA+Phy Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Basic Feed Lysine Lysine Lysine Lysine Methionine Methionine Methionine Methionine Threonine Threonine Threonine Threonine Tryptophan Tryptophan Phytase Phytase Phytase Phytase Basic FCR Low FCR Basic FCR Low FCR 23

24 Results Differen.ated excre.ons The use of amino acids and phytase reduces respectively nitrogen and phosphorus excretion N P Example based on the results from the European Pig produc7on system 1 % 1 % 1 65 % % N & P ExcreDon per 1 kg pig LW produced RelaDve change in N ExcreDon per 1 kg pig LW produced RelaDve change in P ExcreDon per 1 kg pig LW produced 24

25 Results Reduced use of Phosphate The use of phytase reduces the reliance of poultry and pig feed to mineral phosphates (a limited resource) Pigs Poultry Basic Feed Feed+AA+Phy Basic Feed Feed+AA+Phy % 5 % Europe North America Europe North America South America 25

26 Sensi.vity Analysis FCR North America Addi.onally improved feed conversion ra.o for pigs and broilers for the supplemented diets shows clearly addi.onal benefits for all 3 impact categories under inves.ga.on compared to the reference scenario. Land Use Change (LUC) was not considered due to the local sourcing of raw materials without land use change. Pigs Poultry High FCR Low FCR High FCR Low FC % % 4 4 GWP EP AP GWP EP AP 26

27 Sensi.vity Analysis FCR South America Addi.onally improved feed conversion ra.o for pigs and broilers for the supplemented diets shows clearly addi.onal benefits for all 3 impact categories under inves.ga.on compared to the reference scenario. Considering Land Use Change (LUC) decreases the reduc.on poten.al due to less credits for manure disposal for poultry. Pigs Poultry High FCR Low FCR High FCR Low FCR % % 4 4 GWP GWP (with LUC) EP AP GWP GWP (with LUC) EP AP 27