Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment
|
|
- Shawn Cummings
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment March 1, 2010 By: Rick Wilson, Environmental Specialist, Ohio EPA -Division of Surface Water Pages1-3: Explanation of Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment (March 1, 2010) Table 1: Ranking of Practices addressing Sediment Cause of Water Quality Impairment Table 2: Ranking of Practices addressing Nutrient Cause of Water Quality Impairment Table 3: Ranking of Practices addressing Habitat & Hydromodification Table 4: Ranking of Practices addressing Pesticides Cause of Water Quality Impairment Table 5: Ranking of Practices addressing Pathogen Cause of Water Quality Impairment Table 6: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients and Habitat & Hydromodification Table 7: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients, Habitat & Hydromodification, Pathogen and Pesticide Cause of Water Quality Impairment
2 Explanation of Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment Page 1 of 3 March 1, 2010 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) provides a set of practice standards as listed in Ohio-USDA NRCS Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) to facilitate implementation or installation of measures to address any number of defined farming related resource concerns. There are currently 101 unique practice standards listed in the Ohio-NRCS FOTG. Nationally, there are seventy-nine (79) defined resource concerns which include concerns for soil, air and water quality, plant health, soil erosion, water quantity, fish and wildlife, etc. On a semi-regular basis and most recently in 2007, the Ohio NRCS program evaluated practice effectiveness by giving a relative ranking (ranging from -5 to +5) for each practice standard against each resource concern. This ranking procedure is called the Conservation Physical Practice Effects (CPPE) ranking. Negative ranking indicates that the practice is detrimental to solving the resource concern, while positive ranking means that the practice will be of benefit in solving the resource concern. Water quality protection is the main mission of the Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water (DSW) and water quality is regularly identified as the highest priority resource concern in USDA conservation programs such as Wetland Reserve Program (WRP), Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), etc. As such, Ohio EPA staff performed a spreadsheet analysis of the Ohio NRCS 2007 CPPE rankings to identify which practices rank highest to address the variety of water quality related resource concerns. The following paragraphs explain how the Ohio EPA-DSW analysis was performed. 1) Twenty-seven (27) resource concerns were identified that had any relationship with water quality and are listed below. Compaction Excessive Nutrients and Organics in Surface Water Excessive Suspended Sediment and Turbidity in Surface Water Harmful Levels of Pathogens in Surface Water Harmful Levels of Pesticides in Surface Water Excessive Runoff, Flooding, or Ponding Classic Gully Erosion Ephemeral Gully Erosion Sheet and Rill Erosion Streambank Erosion Contaminants - Residual Pesticides Damage from Sediment Deposition Organic Matter Depletion Contaminants-Animal Waste and Other Organics - N Contaminants-Animal Waste and Other Organics - P Contaminants-Animal Waste and Other Organics - K Contaminants-Commercial Fertilizer - N Contaminants-Commercial Fertilizer - P Contaminants-Commercial Fertilizer - K Rangeland Site Stability Wind Harmful Temperatures of Surface Water Excessive Subsurface Water Inadequate Outlets Insufficient Flows in Water Courses Reduced Capacity of Conveyances by Sediment Deposition Reduced Storage of Water Bodies by Sediment Accumulation 2) Five (5) leading causes of water quality impairment in Ohio surface water tributaries including nutrients, sediment, hydromodification & habitat, pesticides, and pathogens were selected to be included in the analysis. These causes were selected to be
3 analyzed with respect to the degree with which implementation of any given practice standard to address a given water quality related resource may benefit or be of detriment to a selected cause of water quality impairment 3) A relative weight factor (-1.0 to 1.0) was assigned to each selected water quality-related resource concern for each cause of impairment. These weights were assigned by comparing two (2) sets of independent DSW-staff assigned relative weight factor rankings (per resource concern and water quality impairment cause). The ranking weight values were based upon applicable experience and best professional judgment of staff environmental specialist analysts. The table below provides a snap-shot of example weight factors assigned by OEPA staff per water quality impairment cause. (Four of the 27 resource concerns analyzed are shown here as an example). 4) Next the relative weight per resource concern and cause of impairment were used as multipliers against CPPE rating done by Ohio NRCS, then added across all resource concerns. Below is a snap-shot of Ohio USDA NRCS CPPE rankings by resource concern and practice standard as assigned using best professional judgment at Ohio USDA NRCS in 2007: ResourceConcern- Practice Standard Compaction Excessive Nutrients and Organics in Surface Water Excessive Suspended Sediment and Turbidity in Surface Water Harmful Levels of Pathogens in Surface Water Harmful Levels of Pesticides in Surface Water Critical Area Planting (342) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Filter Strip (393) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Prescribed Grazing (528) ) This summation yielded total values for each practice based upon the 5 causes of water quality impairment (as described in table below). Whereas the numerical value is of relative unimportance, comparing the score of one practice to another does have value. Positive values describe that there is a degree of benefit to address a particular water quality cause of impairment, while negative values mean that the practice is detrimental, or worsens the impacts to water quality. Practices with highest positive Page 2 of 3
4 values would be expected to benefit water quality most when compared to practices with very low yet still positive values. Example table describing summation by practice standard and water quality cause of impairment is below. SED + NUT + H&H ratio SED NUT H&H PEST PATH Rank Resource Concern ---> 1 Critical Area Planting (342) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Filter Strip (393) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Prescribed Grazing (528) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Conservation Cover (327) Mulching (484) Field Border (386) Cover Crop (340) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Use Exclusion (472) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Sediment Basin (350) Stripcropping (585) Brush Management (314) ) The table above also provides a ranking snap-shot of the Ohio USDA NRCS practice standards that best address a combination of sediment, nutrient and habitat & hydromodification causes of water quality impairment. Complete rankings can be found in the attached Ranking of Ohio-USDA NRCS Practices Standards for Addressing Water Quality Causes of Impairment document which provides the results of the rankings by water quality cause for each of the 101 NRCS practice standards, sorted from best to worst for addressing all 5 leading causes of water quality and 2 aggregations (sediment + nutrients + habitat & hydromodifcation AND (sediment + nutrients + habitat & hydromodifcation + pathogens + pesticides), totaling 7 tables. Summary: In summary, the practice standard rankings that can be found in the attached document, Ranking of Ohio-USDA NRCS Practices Standard Effectiveness for Addressing Water Quality Causes of Impairment can inform decision makers whose role it is to effectively enroll row crop farming enterprises, land managers and livestock producer in programs such as Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), to gain more widespread implementation of those practice standards that can best provide benefit toward improving water quality in Ohio tributaries based upon impairment cause (or combinations thereof), and minimizing enrollment for practices with limited benefit to water quality. Page 3 of 3
5 Table 1: Ranking of Practices addressing Sediment Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED ratio NUT H&H PEST PATH 1 Critical Area Planting (342) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Filter Strip (393) Prescribed Grazing (528) Mulching (484) Conservation Cover (327) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Cover Crop (340) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Sediment Basin (350) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Stripcropping (585) Field Border (386) Brush Management (314) Use Exclusion (472) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Contour Farming (330) Grassed Waterway (412) Diversion (362) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Constructed Wetland (656) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Underground Outlet (620) Subsurface Drain (606) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Prescribed Burning (338) /25/2010
6 Table 1: Ranking of Practices addressing Sediment Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED ratio NUT H&H PEST PATH 34 Forage Harvest Management (511) Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Roof Runoff Structure (558) Pond (378) Watering Facility (614) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566) Wetland Restoration (657) Wetland Creation (658) Wetland Enhancement (659) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Waste Utilization (633) Structure for Water Control (587) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Stream Crossing (578) Clearing and Snagging (326) Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Pest Management (595) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395) Spring Development (574) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Land Smoothing (466) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Pumping Plant (533) Open Channel (582) Nutrient Management (590) Access Road (560) Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) /25/2010
7 Table 1: Ranking of Practices addressing Sediment Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED ratio NUT H&H PEST PATH 68 Water Well (642) Waste Storage Facility (313) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Drainage Water Management (554) Composting Facility (317) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) Animal Mortality Facility (316) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Hedgerow Planting (422) Firebreak (394) Manure Transfer (634) Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Fishpond Management (399) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Fish Passage (396) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Bedding (310) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Dike (356) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490) /25/2010
8 Table 2: Ranking of Practices addressing Nutrient Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED Nutrient ratio H&H PEST PATH 1 Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Filter Strip (393) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Prescribed Grazing (528) Field Border (386) Nutrient Management (590) Critical Area Planting (342) Conservation Cover (327) Cover Crop (340) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Use Exclusion (472) Waste Utilization (633) Mulching (484) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Forage Harvest Management (511) Constructed Wetland (656) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Sediment Basin (350) Stripcropping (585) Grassed Waterway (412) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Contour Farming (330) Waste Storage Facility (313) Brush Management (314) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Wetland Creation (658) Heavy Use Area Protection (561)
9 Table 2: Ranking of Practices addressing Nutrient Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED Nutrient ratio H&H PEST PATH 34 Wetland Restoration (657) Wetland Enhancement (659) Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) Prescribed Burning (338) Diversion (362) Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Pest Management (595) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Drainage Water Management (554) Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Roof Runoff Structure (558) Pond (378) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Manure Transfer (634) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Composting Facility (317) Spring Development (574) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Animal Mortality Facility (316) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Structure for Water Control (587) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566) Hedgerow Planting (422) Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Watering Facility (614) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395)
10 Table 2: Ranking of Practices addressing Nutrient Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED Nutrient ratio H&H PEST PATH 68 Open Channel (582) Dike (356) Underground Outlet (620) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Water Well (642) Fishpond Management (399) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Land Smoothing (466) Stream Crossing (578) Pumping Plant (533) Access Road (560) Clearing and Snagging (326) Subsurface Drain (606) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Firebreak (394) Fish Passage (396) Bedding (310) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608)
11 Table 3: Ranking of Practices addressing Habitat and Hydromodification Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H ratio PEST PATH 1 Critical Area Planting (342) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Filter Strip (393) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Mulching (484) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Brush Management (314) Sediment Basin (350) Field Border (386) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Conservation Cover (327) Prescribed Grazing (528) Stripcropping (585) Use Exclusion (472) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Cover Crop (340) Contour Farming (330) Grassed Waterway (412) Diversion (362) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Constructed Wetland (656) Underground Outlet (620) Subsurface Drain (606) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Forage Harvest Management (511) Roof Runoff Structure (558)
12 Table 3: Ranking of Practices addressing Habitat and Hydromodification Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H ratio PEST PATH 34 Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Watering Facility (614) Prescribed Burning (338) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Pond (378) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Structure for Water Control (587) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566) Wetland Creation (658) Wetland Restoration (657) Wetland Enhancement (659) Waste Utilization (633) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Stream Crossing (578) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Pest Management (595) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Clearing and Snagging (326) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Nutrient Management (590) Hedgerow Planting (422) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Fish Passage (396) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) Fishpond Management (399) Animal Mortality Facility (316)
13 Table 3: Ranking of Practices addressing Habitat and Hydromodification Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H ratio PEST PATH 68 Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Waste Storage Facility (313) Spring Development (574) Composting Facility (317) Dike (356) Manure Transfer (634) Open Channel (582) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Access Road (560) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Firebreak (394) Pumping Plant (533) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) Land Smoothing (466) Drainage Water Management (554) Water Well (642) Bedding (310) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490)
14 Table 4: Ranking of Practices addressing Pesticide Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H PESTICIDE ratio PATH 1 Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Conservation Cover (327) Filter Strip (393) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Pest Management (595) Prescribed Grazing (528) Field Border (386) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Forage Harvest Management (511) Cover Crop (340) Mulching (484) Critical Area Planting (342) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Stripcropping (585) Grassed Waterway (412) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Constructed Wetland (656) Sediment Basin (350) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Waste Utilization (633) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Use Exclusion (472) Contour Farming (330) Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C)
15 Table 4: Ranking of Practices addressing Pesticide Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H PESTICIDE ratio PATH 35 Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Wetland Creation (658) Subsurface Drain (606) Wetland Restoration (657) Wetland Enhancement (659) Prescribed Burning (338) Dike (356) Diversion (362) Hedgerow Planting (422) Drainage Water Management (554) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566) Pond (378) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Nutrient Management (590) Open Channel (582) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Roof Runoff Structure (558) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Structure for Water Control (587) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395) Brush Management (314) Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) Animal Mortality Facility (316) Underground Outlet (620) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Waste Storage Facility (313) Watering Facility (614)
16 Table 4: Ranking of Practices addressing Pesticide Rank Conservation Practice Standards SED NUT H&H PESTICIDE ratio PATH 70 Access Road (560) Stream Crossing (578) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Composting Facility (317) Fishpond Management (399) Pumping Plant (533) Spring Development (574) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Manure Transfer (634) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Clearing and Snagging (326) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) Water Well (642) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Fish Passage (396) Land Smoothing (466) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608) Firebreak (394) Bedding (310) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490)
17 Table 5: Ranking of Practices addressing Pathogen Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED NUT H&H PEST PATH ratio 1 Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Use Exclusion (472) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Manure Transfer (634) Nutrient Management (590) Waste Utilization (633) Prescribed Grazing (528) Waste Storage Facility (313) Composting Facility (317) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Constructed Wetland (656) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Filter Strip (393) Field Border (386) Conservation Cover (327) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Cover Crop (340) Forage Harvest Management (511) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Animal Mortality Facility (316) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Roof Runoff Structure (558) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Spring Development (574)
18 Table 5: Ranking of Practices addressing Pathogen Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED NUT H&H PEST PATH ratio 34 Mulching (484) Critical Area Planting (342) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Sediment Basin (350) Grassed Waterway (412) Wetland Creation (658) Wetland Restoration (657) Wetland Enhancement (659) Drainage Water Management (554) Pest Management (595) Stripcropping (585) Contour Farming (330) Diversion (362) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Watering Facility (614) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Firebreak (394) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Access Road (560) Brush Management (314) Hedgerow Planting (422) Prescribed Burning (338) Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) Pond (378) Structure for Water Control (587) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566)
19 Table 5: Ranking of Practices addressing Pathogen Rank Conservation Practice Standard SED NUT H&H PEST PATH ratio 69 Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395) Open Channel (582) Dike (356) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) Fishpond Management (399) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Pumping Plant (533) Clearing and Snagging (326) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Fish Passage (396) Water Well (642) Underground Outlet (620) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Land Smoothing (466) Subsurface Drain (606) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Bedding (310) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608) Stream Crossing (578)
20 Table 6: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients and Habitat & Hydromodification Causes of Water Quality Impairment, Page 1 of 3 Causes of Water Quality Impairment Rank Resource Concern ---> SED + NUT + H&H ratio SED NUT H&H PEST PATH CODE 1 Critical Area Planting (342) Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Filter Strip (393) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Prescribed Grazing (528) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Conservation Cover (327) Mulching (484) Field Border (386) Cover Crop (340) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Use Exclusion (472) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Sediment Basin (350) Stripcropping (585) Brush Management (314) Contour Farming (330) Grassed Waterway (412) Constructed Wetland (656) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Forage Harvest Management (511) Diversion (362) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Recreation Trail and Walkway (568) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) Waste Utilization (633) Prescribed Burning (338) Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) Underground Outlet (620) Roof Runoff Structure (558)
21 Table 6: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients and Habitat & Hydromodification Causes of Water Quality Impairment, Page 2 of 3 Causes of Water Quality Impairment Rank Resource Concern ---> SED + NUT + H&H ratio SED NUT H&H PEST PATH CODE 36 Wetland Creation (658) Wetland Restoration (657) Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) Pond (378) Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603) Subsurface Drain (606) Nutrient Management (590) Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Wetland Enhancement (659) Watering Facility (614) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Recreation Land Grading and Shaping (566) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Livestock Use Area Protection (757) Structure for Water Control (587) Pest Management (595) Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till (345) Forest Stand Improvement (666) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380) Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats (643) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395) Waste Treatment Lagoon (359) Waste Storage Facility (313) Stream Crossing (578) Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation (650) Spring Development (574) Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) Clearing and Snagging (326) Wastewater Treatment Strip (635) Agrichemical Mixing Facility (702) Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility (632) Composting Facility (317) Animal Mortality Facility (316) Wildlife Watering Facility (648) Hedgerow Planting (422) Manure Transfer (634)
22 Table 6: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients and Habitat & Hydromodification Causes of Water Quality Impairment Causes of Water Quality Impairment Rank Resource Concern ---> SED + NUT + H&H ratio SED NUT H&H PEST PATH CODE 72 Drainage Water Management (554) Open Channel (582) Land Smoothing (466) Fishpond Management (399) Closure of Waste Impoundment (360) Access Road (560) Pumping Plant (533) Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant (521C) (c ) 80 Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (521D) (d) 81 Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane (521A) (a) 82 Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant (521B) (b) 83 Dike (356) Fish Passage (396) Water Well (642) Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) Animal Trails and Walkways (575) Firebreak (394) Dry Hydrant (432) Fence (382) Pipeline (516) Prescribed Forestry (409) Shallow Water Development and Management (646) Well Decommissioning (351) Early Successional Habitat Development/Management (647) Bedding (310) Forest Trails and Landings (655) Aquaculture Ponds (397) Surface Drainage, Field Ditch (607) Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral (608) Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490) , Page 3 of 3
23 Table 7: Ranking of Practices addressing combination of Sediment, Nutrients, Habitat & Hydromodification, Pathogen and Pesticide Causes of Water Quality Impairment Causes of Water Quality Impairment Rank Conservation Program Practice Standards S+N+HH+P+P ratio SED NUT H&H PEST PATH 1 Riparian Forest Buffer (391) Critical Area Planting (342) Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) Pasture and Hay Planting (512) Filter Strip (393) Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Prescribed Grazing (528) Conservation Cover (327) Field Border (386) Cover Crop (340) Mulching (484) Land Reconstruction, Abandoned Mined Land (543) Land Reconstruction, Currently Mined Land (544) Contour Buffer Strips (332) Use Exclusion (472) Water and Sediment Control Basin (638) Stripcropping (585) Sediment Basin (350) Forage Harvest Management (511) Grassed Waterway (412) Constructed Wetland (656) Contour Farming (330) Residue Management, Seasonal (344) Brush Management (314) Heavy Use Area Protection (561) Waste Utilization (633) Pest Management (595) Diversion (362) Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed (329) Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till (346) Wetland Creation (658) Lined Waterway or Outlet (468) Wetland Restoration (657) Nutrient Management (590)
Technical Training and Certification Program Individual Development Plans for technical employees
Technical Training and Certification Program Individual Development Plans for technical employees Purpose: The goal of the Technical Training and Certification Program (TTCP) is developing and maintaining
More informationMississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative
Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative A Progress Report for Arkansas Presented by: Mike Sullivan, State Conservationist FY 2010 12 States 41 Focus Areas FY 2011 Added two focus areas: SD/MS
More informationAgricultural NPS Measures. Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt
Agricultural NPS Measures Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt How are Ag BMPs Implemented? Texas Conservation Partnership Providing Conservation Assistance to Private Landowners for 70 Years LOCAL- 217 Soil and Water
More informationMississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative
Helping People Help the Land www.nrcs.usda.gov Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative Overview To improve the health of the Mississippi River Basin, including water quality and wildlife
More informationConservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014
Conservation Choices Your guide to conservation and environmental farming practices. Conservation Choices These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... The practice reduces soil erosion
More informationConservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.
Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health. Sediment Conservation Cover Cover Crop Critical Area Planting Field
More informationV. Eligible Practices A. Cost-Share Practices
V. Eligible Practices A. Cost-Share Practices Sheet and Rill/Gully Erosion Resource Concern... 9 DSL-01 Permanent Vegetative Cover Establishment... 9 DSL-02 Permanent Vegetative Cover Improvement... 11
More informationDegradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients
Near Blue River ca. 1980 Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation Water quality Sediment Nutrients Program cost Cheaper to prevent Still expensive Long-term productivity
More informationAppendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution
Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution Sources Nonpoint source of pollution, unlike pollution from industrial and sewage treatment plants, comes from many different sources. Nonpoint source pollution is
More informationConservation. Conservation Practice. Cover 327. What is it? How it Works. Which Resource Concerns? Where it Works Best
Cover 327 Cover - Perennial vegetation cover that protects soil and water resources on land retired from agricultural production. Wind After harvest, a cover crop such as rye, oats or a legume is planted.
More informationAgricultural Best Management Practice Systems Catalogue. NYS Soil and Water Conservation Committee
Agricultural Best Management Practice Systems Catalogue NYS Soil and Water Conservation Committee April 16, 2014 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 Page(s) Table 1 Management Practices with Component
More informationKittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan
Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan Presented by John Small and Nora Schlenker, Anchor QEA 1 Agenda Welcome and Follow-up from Last Meeting Protection and Enhancement Strategies Goals and Measurable
More informationPayment is to be used to exclude only, livestock must currently be present in the area intended to be protected to qualify for this payment.
472 Access Control Name Scenario Unit Type Access Control From Stream or Wetland or Woodland AC $75 $750 Y Payment is to be used to exclude only, livestock must currently be present in the area intended
More informationIntegrated Pest Management Plan Criteria Practice/Activity Code (114) (No.)
Attachment D Integrated Pest Management Plan Criteria Practice/Activity Code (114) (No.) 1. Definition: Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is an ecosystem-based strategy that is a sustainable approach to
More informationConservation Stewardship Program Conservation Activity List
Name: Date: The Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) encourages agricultural producers to improve conservation systems by undertaking additional conservation activities and improving, maintaining, and
More informationWatershed BMPs. Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs. Focus on key BMPs
Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/standards/nhcp.html Focus on key BMPs Function, benefits, and drawbacks listed Definition Novotny & Olem: BMPs are methods and practices
More informationBest Management Practices (BMPs) are structural
Agriculture and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY: Controlling Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution A L A B A M A A & M A N D A U B U R N U N I V E R S I T I E S ANR-790-4.2.3 The Rural Environment And NPS Pollution
More informationConcepts of Planning, Certification, and Job Approval for Ecological Science Policy: National Planning Procedures Handbook (NPPH) Part
Concepts of Planning, Certification, and Job Approval for Ecological Science Policy: National Planning Procedures Handbook (NPPH) Part 600.10-600.12 Judy Derricks, State Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS
More informationWatercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities
Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities Watercourses and regulated wetlands can be found throughout New Brunswick, including on agricultural lands. The Clean Water Act defines a watercourse
More informationTable 1. Relationship between critical areas and key functions. Shaded areas represent functions associated with each critical area. Storage.
Flow Storage Nutrients Temperature Bacteria Contaminants Cowlitz County Voluntary Stewardship Program 4 Goals, Benchmarks, Strategies and Indicators 4.1 Approach Goals and Benchmarks Critical Areas Functions
More informationRole of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources
Role of Soils in Water Quality Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Water Quality in Texas Water is a finite resource that can be impaired by pollution from
More informationNRCS EQIP and Organic Dairy Farms
NRCS EQIP and Organic Dairy Farms Presented by Sarah Brown, Organic Specialist, Oregon Tilth & NRCS and John Foster Oregon Tilth March 14, 2007 Kevin Kaija, Agronomist, Vermont NRCS January 16, 2014 Outline
More informationNRCS WATER QUALITY PROGRAM
WATER QUALITY FOR THE 21st CENTURY OCTOBER NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE 2006 Linda Oyer Scheffe has been the Acting National Nutrient Management Specialist since September 2006 for the
More informationConservation Planning. Steve Barker, Resource Management Systems LLC
Conservation Planning Steve Barker, Resource Management Systems LLC Overview What is a conservation plan Conservation Districts The NRCS 9 step planning process First Nations support for Tribal producers
More informationLocal Government Commission California Adaptation Forum
Local Government Commission California Adaptation Forum Anne Coates, Executive Director Cachuma Resource Conservation District Russell Chamberlin, Rancher Ted Chamberlin Ranch, Santa Barbara County Sigrid
More informationAgriculture Energy Management Plan, Landscape Criteria - Practice/Activity Code (124) (No.)
Agriculture Energy Management Plan, Landscape Criteria - Practice/Activity Code (124) (No.) 1. Definition A Landscape Agricultural Energy Management Plan (Landscape AgEMP) contains the strategy by which
More informationGreat Lakes Restoration Initiative in Wisconsin
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative in Wisconsin Fiscal Year Report NRCS Mission: Helping People Help the Land The Natural Resources Conservation Service has assisted Wisconsin landowners in conserving
More informationThe Clean Water Act. Clarifies protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands
Waters of the U.S. Proposed Rule Clarifies protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands The Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act covers navigable waters, which the Act defines as waters
More informationPRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.)
PA528 1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.) CODE 528 DEFINITION Managing the harvest of vegetation with grazing and/or browsing animals. PURPOSE
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: GRAZING MANAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: GRAZING MANAGEMENT Environmental Benefits of Pasture The environmental benefits of well-managed pasture include reduced soil erosion, improved air and water quality, better plant
More informationObjectives ALPHABET SOUP A GUIDE TO NRCS PROGRAMS. General Agency Overview Programs & Practices Available Success Stories Questions??
ALPHABET SOUP A GUIDE TO NRCS PROGRAMS Leah Carson, Rangeland Management Specialist Thedford NRCS Service Center Anna Ferguson, Soil Conservationist Rushville NRCS Service Center Objectives General Agency
More informationAgricultural NPS Measures. Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt
Agricultural NPS Measures Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt How are Ag BMPs Implemented? Texas Conservation Partnership Providing Conservation Assistance to Private Landowners for 70 Years LOCAL - 217 Soil and
More information2010 Growing Season - Barton County, Kansas Land Cover Summary
2010 Growing Season - Barton County, Kansas Land Cover Summary Number of Fields Percent of Total Fields Total Acres Percent of Acres ALFALFA 39 7.1% 3,075.5 6.4% CORN 45 8.1% 5,328.6 11.1% CRP 4 0.7% 408.5
More informationKittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan
Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan Presented by John Small and Nora Schlenker, Anchor QEA 1 Agenda Welcome and Follow-up from Last Meeting Follow-up on Comments Received Stewardship Practices Description
More informationHow is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?
Watershed Connections Lesson Les4 3 How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use? Overview What are the benefits of a healthy watershed? What are examples of land uses? What types of pollution can come from
More informationUSDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP
USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP Environmental Qualities Incentives Program The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) is a voluntary conservation program. It supports production agriculture and environmental
More informationSite Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report
Site Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report Background The New York State Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is a collaborative effort between the USDA and the State of New York. The goal of
More informationUSC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id)
USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id) Animal Waste Management Systems or Waste Storage Facility (840, 23) Practices designed for proper handling, storage,
More informationCOMET-Planner. Carbon and greenhouse gas evaluation for NRCS conservation practice planning. A companion report to
COMET-Planner Carbon and greenhouse gas evaluation for NRCS conservation practice planning A companion report to www.comet-planner.com 1 COMET-Planner Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation for NRCS Conservation
More informationWEST VIRGINIA CONSERVATION AGENCY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
WEST VIRGINIA CONSERVATION AGENCY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IS THE PRACTICE OF COMMON SENSE. 2nd Edition The Watershed Resource Center is dedicated to protecting
More informationWorking Lands for Wildlife. Wildlife Habitat Financial Assistance Targeted for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
Working Lands for Wildlife Wildlife Habitat Financial Assistance Targeted for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Stu Tuttle, State Biologist Phoenix, Arizona www.az.nrcs.usda.gov stu.tuttle@az.usda.gov
More informationConservation Practices for Landlords There is growing concern over the possible
Conservation Practices for Landlords There is growing concern over the possible impact of rented land on soil conservation. Concerns regarding conservation practices are not new; however, the recent increase
More information10/11/2016 USDA PROGRAMS AND POLLINATOR PROTECTION NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE GETTING STARTED WITH NRCS IMPORTANCE OF POLLINATORS
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE USDA PROGRAMS AND POLLINATOR PROTECTION MATT POWERS AND TRICIA LAVALLEY USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Formerly known as the Soil Conservation Service
More informationModeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed
Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed Presenter: Jeff Arnold, Supervisory Research Engineer, USDA-ARS C. Santhi, M. White, M. Di Luzio
More informationProduction and Conservation Trade-off (PaCT) assessment tool
Production and Conservation Trade-off (PaCT) assessment tool Seeking to better understand the trade-offs associated with different forms of management practices on ecological and economic outcomes Spatial
More information2010 Growing Season - Cowley County, Kansas Land Cover Summary
2010 Growing Season - Cowley County, Kansas Land Cover Summary Number of Fields Percent of Total Fields Total Acres Percent of Acres ALFALFA 3 0.7% 68.5 0.2% CORN 35 8.4% 2,494.7 8.9% CRP - - - - FALLOW
More informationJanuary 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017
BIG STONE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S ANNUAL PLAN OF WORK In Cooperation with Big Stone County Environmental Office, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Farm Services Agency January
More informationCHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS
CDQAP - RB2 Conditional Waiver Reference Binder Tab 8.1 May, 2017 CDQAP 2017 CHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS Date: Name of Person Completing checklist: Facility Information Facility Name:
More informationThe Purpose and Scope of this Guidance
Introduction The nation s aquatic resources are among its most valuable assets. While environmental protection programs in the United States have successfully improved water quality during the past 25
More informationNUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL (NTT: 2 ND GEN.): AN APEX INTERFACE & A TOOL TO EVALUATE THE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FARM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL (NTT: 2 ND GEN.): AN APEX INTERFACE & A TOOL TO EVALUATE THE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FARM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (HTTP://NN.TARLETON.EDU/NTTG2) General Description and
More informationNRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii
NRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii NRCS Pacific Islands Area Hawaii - State (State (PIA) Office Honolulu, Oahu) Seven field offices (Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Maui, Hawaii) Plant Materials
More informationCONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS
CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS Wes Harris Special Projects Coordinator Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development The University of Georgia wlharris@uga.edu TITLE II FARM SECURITY AND RURAL INVESTMENT
More informationConservation Planning
Conservation Planning Good Conservation Planning vs Good Conservation Plan Good Planning = Following the 9 step planning process with proper documentation(including CPA-52 Environmental Worksheet and CPA-15
More informationThe Environmental Quality Incentives Program: Locally Managing Natural Resources. Sandra S. Batie Mary A. Schulz David B.
Staff Paper The Environmental Quality Incentives Program: Locally Managing Natural Resources Sandra S. Batie Mary A. Schulz David B. Schweikhardt Staff Paper 98-03 March 23, 1998 Department of Agricultural
More informationWATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 201 The Maitland Valley Conservation Authority has prepared this report card as a summary on the state of our forests, wetlands, surface water, and ground water resources.
More informationShell Rock River Watershed: Water Plans
Shell Rock River Watershed: Water Plans The Shell Rock River Watershed encompasses Freeborn County. Each county has developed a 10-year rotating comprehensive local water management plan (LWMP) in order
More informationMINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District
MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District Whatcom Speaker Series October 16, 2014 What is on your mind right now?? Agronomics = Nutrient
More information2010 Growing Season - Harvey County, Kansas Land Cover Summary
2010 Growing Season - Harvey County, Kansas Land Cover Summary Number of Fields Percent of Total Fields Total Acres Percent of Acres ALFALFA 12 2.6% 683.4 2.0% CORN 77 16.5% 6,627.5 19.7% CRP 1 0.2% 13.9
More informationCARBON FARMING IN MARIN
CARBON FARMING IN MARIN MARIN CAP SUBCOMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2017 Can we increase soil carbon? Can we measure it? Compost Results: Carbon Organic matter amendments increased soil carbon by 50 MT C ha -1 in
More informationCARBON FARM PLAN CONTENTS
CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Site Description CARBON FARM PLAN 3. Assessment of Potential Carbon Beneficial Practices 4. Monitoring Soil Carbon 5. Carbon Farm Plan Summary & Map 6. Appendix A: List of NRCS
More informationResource Enhancement and Protection Program. Guidelines Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017)
Resource Enhancement and Protection Program Guidelines Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017) State Conservation Commission 2301 North Cameron Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone: (717) 787-8821 Fax:
More informationWDNR - Using Snap-Plus to Quantify Phosphorus Trading Credits ( )
WDNR - Using Snap-Plus to Quantify Phosphorus Trading Credits (10-23-) Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide technical assistance for using the P Trade report in SnapPlus to quantify Phosphorus
More informationPA Chesapeake Bay Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Schuylkill County Planning Targets
PA Chesapeake Bay Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Schuylkill County Planning Targets What are Planning Targets? The Chesapeake Bay TMDL established regulatory waste load allocations and load allocations
More informationRhode Island Soil Health Worksheet
Rhode Island Health Worksheet Client: Field: Address: Date: Indicator Worst------------------------------------------------>Best Descriptions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor (1-3) Fair (4-7) Excellent (8-10)
More informationWildlife Management Intensity Standards
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management The planned manipulation of livestock numbers and grazing intensities to increase food, The planned manipulation of livestock
More informationReservoir age, increasing human population,
B-6249 02/12 Eagle Mountain Watershed Management Brent Clayton, Justin Mechell, David Waidler and Clint Wolfe* Reservoir age, increasing human population, and changing land uses have prompted the development
More informationNUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL
NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL A Cooperative Project Between Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research (TIAER) USDA NRCS USDA ARS US EPA Funding support for this project was provided in part through a
More informationGLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative
GLASI GLASI Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative Priority Subwatershed Project Wigle Creek Priority Subwatershed Project Essex Region Conservation Authority Up to $75,000 per eligible farm business
More informationStrawberry River Watershed 2003 Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Report
Strawberry River Watershed Summary of Water Quality in the Strawberry Watershed: The Strawberry River, a tributary of the Black River, is located in the Ozark Highland Ecoregion in north central Arkansas.
More informationAdams County Voluntary Stewardship Plan
Adams County Voluntary Stewardship Plan Presented by Ben Floyd, Anchor QEA 1 Agenda Welcome and Meeting Purpose Recap and follow up from December meeting Conceptual Overview of Work Plan Introduction Regional
More informationThe development of user-friendly publications to advance locally led watershed-scale assessment, protection and restoration in South Carolina.
The development of user-friendly publications to advance locally led watershed-scale assessment, protection and restoration in South Carolina. Buz Kloot (ESRI-SC) Amy Maxwell, Tibor Hrvarth, Dick Yetter,
More informationWater Quality in Marin
Carbon Farming Tomales Bay Water Quality in Marin 26 Horse Facilities 26 Dairies Water quality standards approved in 2007 by EPA 2008-Present. All dairies, livestock operations and horse boarding facilities
More information2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop
2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop Focus Area Lower Lewis and Clark Clatsop SWCD has identified this area as one that needs much improvement This does not mean we can t do projects in other areas
More informationKentucky Agriculture Water Quality Plan Producer Workbook
Kentucky Agriculture Water Quality Plan Producer Workbook Do You Need an AWQP? Answer the following questions to determine if you need an agriculture water quality plan, and if so, which sections of the
More informationBEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR GRAZING
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR GRAZING Courtesy NRCS INTRODUCTION The purpose of the brochure is to give the reader some basic range management practices useful for reducing impacts to surface and ground
More informationControlling runon and runoff:
Chapter 8. Surface Water Management This chapter explores: runon and runoff what they are, and the risks associated with them. various management options runon reductions, runoff catchbasins, vegetated
More informationFrom the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations
From the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations Ted Bilderback Nursery Extension Specialist Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Ted_Bilderback@ncsu.edu http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/nursery/
More informationWildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the South Texas Plains Ecoregion
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management Prescribed Burning Range Enhancement (Range Reseeding) Brush Management Riparian Management and Enhancement Wetland Enhancement
More informationProgress Report: Sequestering Carbon In Agricultural Soils
Progress Report: Sequestering Carbon In Agricultural Soils Dr. Sara Via Professor & Climate Extension Specialist svia@umd.edu Source: Modern Farmer Sequestering carbon in healthy soil Plants absorb atmospheric
More informationThe Value of Buffers
Maintain Your Buffers Manage the land to maintain and encourage shallow sheet flow and water infiltration. New techniques have been developed to address concentrated flow, for example, strategically positioned
More informationDIAMONDHEAD LAKE RURAL IMPROVEMENT ZONE ENGINEERING REPORT
H R G R E E N. C O M DIAMONDHEAD LAKE RURAL IMPROVEMENT ZONE ENGINEERING REPORT June 2, 2017 HR Green Project No: 40150046 Prepared For: Diamondhead Lake Rural Improvement Zone I hereby certify that this
More informationTargeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds
Targeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds Andrew Sharpley, Tommy Daniel, Sheri Herron & Bil Gburek University or Arkansas, BMP s Inc. & USDA-ARS ARS Today s s P Cycle is Fragmented Grain P Manure
More informationWhatcom County Farm Plan
Whatcom County Farm Plan Planning Workbook: Checklist and Action Plan For use with the publication: Tips on Land and Water Management For: Land Owner Address Date Introduction Conservation planning means
More informationA Conservation Catalog. Practices for Conserving Pennsylvania s Natural Resources
A Conservation Catalog Practices for Conserving Pennsylvania s Natural Resources Introduction Pennsylvania is a land of great natural resources and Pennsylvania s farmers have always worked as stewards
More information1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROJECT: COUNTY: NAME OF LANDOWNER: CELL/OFFICE PHONE: NAME OF FARM / SITE MANAGER: CELL/OFFICE PHONE: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE
More informationThurston County Voluntary Stewardship Program Work Plan. Appendix C Benchmarks, Monitoring and Adaptive Management
Thurston County Voluntary Stewardship Program Work Plan Appendix C Benchmarks, Monitoring and Adaptive Management Table of Contents 1 Critical Areas Benchmarks and Monitoring... 2 1.1 Critical Areas Benchmarks
More informationGray s Creek. Gray s Creek
Gray s Creek 1 Grades F + Forest Conditions B Wetland Conditions C - Surface Water Quality This Watershed Report Card outlines the environmental information for the Gray s Creek watershed as of 2017. The
More informationWHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD CONSERVATION FARM PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan
WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD CONSERVATION FARM PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan For use with the publication: Tips on Land and Water Management For: Land Owner Operator Address Date 0 Introduction
More informationWHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD FARM CONSERVATION PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan
WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD FARM CONSERVATION PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan For use with the publication: Tips on Land and Water Management For: Land Owner Address Date Introduction Conservation
More informationThe Value of Buffers For Pesticide Stewardship and Much More
The Value of Buffers For Pesticide Stewardship and Much More Always read and follow label directions before buying or using a pesticide. Follow all appropriate federal, provincial, and local regulations.
More informationHOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION
HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION Dick Wolkowski and Larry Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin What are the issues Forage producers typically
More informationBob Broz University of Missouri Extension
Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension brozr@missouri.edu 573-882-0085 What is the purpose on the nutrient reduction committee? Reduce nutrient loading into the Mississippi River and into the Gulf of
More informationSaturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS
Saturated Buffer To intercept tile drainage prior to discharging to surface waters and redistribute the water laterally in the soil profile of the streamside buffer. Subsurface drainage, also known as
More informationClallam County DCD Update to Critical Area Ordinance for Existing & On-Going Agriculture
Clallam County DCD Update to Critical Area Ordinance for Existing & On-Going Agriculture Background on Ag in Clallam County 1. In 1945 there was 1,133 farms on 77,880 acres 2. Since then the number of
More informationModeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Great Lakes and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality
Modeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Great Lakes and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality C. Santhi and CEAP National Assessment Team Texas A&M University System, Temple,
More informationEXTENSION Know how. Know now. EC195 (Revised August 2012)
EXTENSION Know how. Know now. EC195 (Revised August 2012) The Nebraska Phosphorus Index (2012): Background And Users Guide Charles S. Wortmann, Extension Soils Specialist Charles A. Shapiro, Extension
More informationNutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance
Nutrient Management in Developing and Agricultural Areas A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance Chris Meehan, P.E. May 25, 2011 Agenda Physical Improvements Planning Improvements How to get it
More informationCo-Management of Water Quality and Food Safety. Sustainable Ag Expo Monterey, CA Nov 13, 2012
Co-Management of Water Quality and Food Safety Paul Robins Executive Director Resource Conservation District of Monterey Co. Sustainable Ag Expo Monterey, CA Nov 13, 2012 Co-Management A landscape-scale
More informationModeling the Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality in the Pacific Northwest Basin
Modeling the Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality in the Pacific Northwest Basin Presenter: R. Srinivasan, Professor, Texas A&M C. Santhi and CEAP National Assessment Team Texas
More informationThe Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control
The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control Presented at the Tennessee Gas Association Conference April 23, 2008 More than thirty years ago, two-third of the nation's
More information