CC359 Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 : An Overview Part II - The Conservation Provisions (Title XIV)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CC359 Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 : An Overview Part II - The Conservation Provisions (Title XIV)"

Transcription

1 University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 1991 CC359 Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 : An Overview Part II - The Conservation Provisions (Title XIV) A. L. Frederick Follow this and additional works at: Frederick, A. L., "CC359 Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 : An Overview Part II - The Conservation Provisions (Title XIV)" (1991). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Extension at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.

2 e<f( 5.:J</4,3 fl ;; c 33 'f.- University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension CC 359 FOOD, AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION, AND TRADE ACT OF 1990: AN OVERVIEW Part II -The Conservation Provisions (Title XIV) by A.L. (Roy) Frederick The Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act (FACTA) of 1990 was enacted into law on November 28, Generally referred to as the 1990 farm bill, the Act is noteworthy with respect to its comprehensiveness and complexity. For example, it has 25 titles, or major sections, compared to 18 titles for the previous farm bill, the Food Security Act of This is the second of three Campaign Circulars intended to outline major provisions of the FACT A. This Campaign Circular focuses on the conservation provisions (Title XIV). Provisions believed to have potential applicability in Nebraska are emphasized. The intent of this publication is to outline the basic legislation, not the operating rules and regulations that will be announced separately for 1991 and subsequent years by the Secretary of Agriculture. Nor does the publication present a decision-making framework for producers to make decisions about program participation. Information relating to rules and regulations and program participation will be made available in other ways through the Cooperative Extension Division. Much of the information in this publication is taken directly from "Comparison of Commodity and Conservation Provisions for the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills," as prepared by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) of the United States Department of Agriculture. However, in some cases, the information has been abridged where it appears to be repetitious or where readability was thought to be improved by the abridgement. Readers are cautioned, however, that the Act itself and the operating rules and regulations as implemented by ASCS will determine the precise applicability to individual producers. **A.L. (Roy) Frederick is a Professor and Extension Economist-Public Policy, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Assistance from the Nebraska State ASCS Office is gratefully acknowledged. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Kenneth R. Bolen, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Cooperative Extension provides inf(x'mation and educational programs to all people without n:gard to race, color, national origin. sex or handicap.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE XIV- CONSERVATION S ubbte 1 Page Subtitle A- Highly Erodible Land Conservation... 2 Subtitle B- Wetland Conservation... 3 Subtitle C- Agricultural Resources Conservation Programs... 3 Chapter 1 -Environmental Conservation Acreage Reserve Program... 3 Subchapter A- Conservation Reserve Program... 3 Subchapter B- Wetlands Reserve Program... 5 Chapter 2- Water Quality Incentive Program... 6 Chapter 3 -Environmental Easement Program... 7 Chapter 4 -Miscellaneous Provisions... 8 Subtitle D- Other Conservation Measures... 8 Chapter 1 - In~egrated Farm M~n~gement Program... 8 Chapter 2-Miscellaneous Provisions... 8 Subtitle E- Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act; Farmland ProtectiOn... 9 Subtitle F- Administration of Environmental Programs... 9 Subtitle G- Water Quality Research, Education, and Coordination Subtitle H - Pesticides... 9 TITLE XIV- CONSERVATION Subtitle A- Highly Erodible Land Conservation 14.1 Definition of violation: Any highly erodible cropland planted to an agricultural commodity or idled under annual commodity programs without an approved conservation plan is in violation Program ineligibility: Violators are ineligible for commodity program benefits, storage loans, crop insurance, disaster payments, FmHA loans, and storage payments (1985 law). 1'\\e "F t>..c.1' t>.. ot \~~() ex\)amh t'ne \\~\ ot ~me\\~\\)\e programs in the event of violations to include the following: disaster assistance for weather-damaged trees, the t-...'j!,'l:~cu\\.\1'1:a\ <::m\':>e-na\.\.l:)n \>'l:l:)g'l:am, \.be t me'l:genc'j Conservation Program, the Conservation Reserve Program, the Great Plains Conservation Program, the Agricultural Water Quality Protection Program, the Environmental Easement Program, and the Small Watershed Program. The Wetlands Reserve Program is not included in the latter list Conservation compliance plans on expired CRP lands: For highly erodible lands, producers have 2 years to implement plans if structures are required. If structures are required and the Secretary determines there are technical or economic feasibility problems, the time period may be extended beyond 2 years Tenant ineligibility exemption: Tenants are not subject to benefit denial on other complying farms if landlord refuses to comply, and tenant makes good faith effort to comply. An annual report to Congress is required on tenant ineligibility determinations Providing information: Secretary must provide information concerning cost-effective erosion control options available to producers revising or obtaining plans, crop flexibility, base adjustment, and available conservation assistance. \~.6 Non.-comm~-rc\a\ ~x~m\)t.\on.~ N.o'l\-commetcial production of agricultural commodities on 2 acres or less is not subject to conservation compliance Graduated penalties: One violation of the highly erodible land provision over a 5 year-period will be allowed without full penalty if minor, in good faith, and the conservation compliance plan is then followed. Benefits may be reduced by $500 to $5,000 based on the seriousness of the violation. This does not apply to violations that occured prior to the enactment of the 1990 farm bill Exemption from penalty: No penalty will be assessed if the violation is technical and has minimal effect~ circumstances occurred that were beyond control ()~\he \)etson~ Ot an exem\)t\on \\as been granted to nand\e a specific problem. Such violations do not affect eligibility for graduated penalties. 2

4 14.9 Erosion reduction standards: Report language indicates intent that standards should not exceed those in effect prior to 1990 farm bill enactment. Subtitle B- Wetland Conservation Definition of wetlands: Wetlands must meet three specific criteria: (1) have a predominance of hydric soils; (2) be inundated or saturated by water at a frequency or duration sufficient to support hydrophytic vegetation; and (3) give evidence of h.yprophytic vegetation Program ineligibility: Consistent with highly erodible land conservation provision. (See 14.2.) Loans made prior to 12/23/85 are exempt Swampbuster trigger: Conversion of a wetland after enactment date of 1990 farm bill (November 28, 1990), even if an agricultural commodity is not planted Duration of ineligibility: For conversion occurring after enactment, converter is ineligible until converted wetland is restored law applies for land converted prior to enactment of 1990 farm bill. (See also mitigation possiblities in ) Minimal effect exemption; mitigation: Exemption from penalty may be granted if any of three conditions is met: l) Actions have minimal effect on functional hydrological and biological value; 2) Land has been frequently cropped, action is mitigated through restoration of prior converted wetland (those converted prior to 12/23/85), and restored wetland is protected by an easement; or 3) for wetlands converted on or after 12/23/ 85 but before 11/28/90, mitigation will be permitted as specified in (2), except that converted wetland need not to have been frequently cropped. The Secretary of Agriculture is required to consult with the Secretary of Interior on mitigation and restoration Mitigated wetlands: Must be restored in accordance with a plan, at no government expense, in the same general area of watershed, and be on a 1-for-1 acreage basis unless more acreage is needed. Producers may appeal any requirements above a 1-for-1 acreage basis. 14;16 Determination of minimal effect: Shall be made by local Soil Conservation Service (SCS) in concurrence with local Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). If agreement is not reached, state SCS decides in consultation with FWS Restoration and mitigation plans: Developed by local SCS in concurrence with local FWS. Disputes settled as in Other exemptions: Similar provisions in 1990 as in 1985, including exemptions if conversion commenced before 12/23/85, land is an artificial wetland, or if land qualifies as "farmed wetland." Delineation of wetlands: Requires delineation, certification, public listing, and periodic review of wetland maps On-site inspection: Required before withholding benefits Prior determinations: No person shall be adversely affected because of having taken an action based on a previous determination by the Secretary Good faith exemption; graduated penalties: Benefits may be reduced by $750 to $10,000 based on the seriousness of the violation, if action occurred in good faith, swampbuster not violated in the past 10 years, and wetland is to be fully restored. Exemption may be provided for violations that occurred prior to 1990 farm bill enactment if action occurred in good faith Fairness of compliance: Cropland reclassified as wetland due to actions of others would not be subject to swampbuster. Subtitle C - Agricultural Resources Conservation Programs Organization: Consists of 3 sections: 1) Environmental Conservation Acreage Reserve Program (ECARP), which consists of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP); 2) Water Quality Incentive Program (WQIP); and 3) Environmental Easement Program. Environmental Conservation Acreage Reserve Program (Chapter 1) Enrollment goal: The Secretary shall enroll not less than 40 nor more than 45 million acres through calendar year A goal of 1 million acres under perpetmil or long-term easements in the WRP will count toward the 40-million-acre minimum ECARP. Acreage enrolled in the CRP prior to 11/28/90 also will count toward the minimum ECARP total Weed and pest control on ECARP: Secretary shall provide technical assistance to owners for developing and implmenting weed and pest control programs. Secretary may provide cost sharing for insect infestations likely to adversely affect surrounding commercial land. The report language indicates that Secretary should rigorously enforce weed and pest control requirements in ECARP contracts. Conservation Reserve Program (Subchapter A) Establishment: Secretary shall carry out program to assist owners and operators of highly erodible cropland (HEL) to conserve and improve soil and water 3

5 resources. Discretion is provided to allow targeting for water quality and other environmental concerns in addition to HEL problems Enrollment goal: 39 to 44 million acres (including 34 million acres currently enrolled), but reserve 1 million acres for enrollment in each of the 1994 and 1995 calendar years. To the extent practicable, not less than one-eighth of newly contracted acreage devoted to trees, shrubs, or other non-crop vegetation or water that provides permanent wildlife habitat. The report language indicates that lands not able to meet conservation compliance should be given priority in 1994 and County enrollment limitation: Cropland acres committed to the CRP, the WRP, and the Environmental Easement Program shall not total to more than 25% of a county's cropland unless producers have difficulty complying with conservation plans or other environmental requirements, and the local economy is not adversely impacted. Secretary shall not require written consent from a member of Congress to waive limiation. Land planted to shelterbelts and windbreaks under easements does not count toward the 25% limitation Eligible lands: Secretary may include: (1) HEL that could substantially reduce productive capacity if untreated; (2) marginal pasture converted to wetland or established as wildlife habitat prior to enactment of the 1990 farm bill; (3) marginal pasture to be devoted to trees in or near riparian areas or for similar water quality purposes, limited to 10 percent of new CRP enrollment; (4) cropland not otherwise eligible that contributes to the degradation of water quality or where continued cropping could pose a threat to water quality Other eligible lands: Secretary may also include: (1) newly-created permanent grass sod waterways and contour grass strips that are part of a conservation plan. (2) cropland newly devoted to living snow fences, permanent wildlife habitat, windbreaks, shelterbelts, orfilterstrips not devoted to trees or shrubs. (Producers must provide useful-life easements for these practices.) (3) cropland threatened by salinity problems or that poses an off-farm environmental threat. (4) cropland on which the Secretary has prevented production of agricultural commodities, if otherwise eligible Farmed wetlands: In the 1990 farm bill, farmed wetlands are not specifically mentioned with 4 respect to the Conservation Reserve Program. Rather, farmed wetlands are eligible for enrollment in the Wetlands Reserve Program under permanent or long-term easements Lands not eligible: HEL may not be eligible where erosion reduction goals could be met with conservation plans. In addition, lands may not be eligible where water quality goals could be effectively achieved through enrollment in the Water Quality Incentive Program Contract length: Contracts are for 10 to 15 years. Producers may have the option of selecting a ISyear contract if lands are devoted to hardwood trees, shelterbelts, windbreaks, or wildlife corridors. Secretary may allow existing contracts devoted to hardwood trees to be extended to 15 years Conservation priority areas: Secretary shall designate selected watershed areas such as the Chesapeake Bay region as conservation priority areas, and attempt to maximize water quality and habitat benefits by promoting a significant level of enrollment in such areas Acceptable practices: Water cover for wildlife is made explicitly acceptable if water is not used for livestock, irrigation, or fish production. Haying and grazing is allowed for drought or similar emergency. In return for applicable reduction in payments, limited grazing that is incidental to gleaning of crops could be allowed HEL and CRP participation: CRP participants farming HEL are subject to conservation compliance rules. In addition, new CRP participants producing agricultural commodities on newly purchased HEL that does not have a history of non-forage crop production are subject to loss of program benefits, including refund of rental and cost-share payments Effect of foreclosure: On transfer of right or interest, the Secretary may require refund of all payments if new owner does not assume all obligations. The Secretary is explicitly allowed to waive payback requirements for owners subject to foreclosure Cost share: Fifty percent of the cost of establishing water quality and conservation measures and practices may be provided, where appropriate and in the public interest. The total amount of cost-share assistance from all sources may not exceed 100% of total establishment costs. Cost-share assistance may not be received if costshare assistance is also provided by another federal program Tree planting incentives: Secretary may permit continuous sign-up for hardwood trees. Secretary shall provide 50% cost share for new contracts devoted to hardwood trees, windbreaks, shelter-

6 belts, or wildlife corridors and for existing contracts converted to such practices. Cost share to be provided for establishment and maintenance, including reestablishing such tree plantings, is during a 2- to 4-year period. Tree planting, on 10-acre or larger contracts, may be accomplished over 3 years Other tree planting incentives: Secretary is encouraged to use CRP, as well as ACP and other programs, to assist in maintenance, afforestation, and reforestation of forest lands. Secretary shall encourage participants to enlist the cooperative assistance of the State Forester in obtaining technical and financial assistance under Forestry Title provisions Acceptability of contracts: Secretary may consider improvements to soil resources, water quality, wildlife habitat, or other environmental benefits. Secretary may establish different criteria for different areas based on water quality concerns, wildlife habitat, or soil erosion Payments by states: The $50,000 payment cap may be waived in states with approved special CRP enhancement programs. Payments to participants in special state CRP enhancement programs must be in cash Payments to heirs: Allows CRP payments to be made to heirs even if CRP payment cap has been reached Exemption from sequester: Payments, including payments on existing contracts, are exempt from automatic sequester Ownership requirement: Land must be owned at least 3 years, unless acquired by will or succession, or before 1/l/85, or Secretary agrees that the land was not acquired for enrollment purposes or land foreclosed on and old owner exercises right of redemption Conversion of land subject to contract; extension of contracts: Secretary shall allow wetland under existing CRP contracts to be transferred to the WRP. Secretary shall allow producers converting grass cover to hardwood trees, windbreaks, shelterbelts, or wildlife corridors to extend current 10-year contracts to 15 years. Producers must provide useful-life easements for windbreaks, shelterbelts, and wildlife corridors. Secretary shall provide cost-share assistance where appropriate. The sum of the new and original cost-share assistance may not exceed the amount that the participant would have received if the new practice had been the original practice Post-CRP issues: Producers are given 2 years to implement conservation plans when structures are required; unless, for land needing structures, the Secretary determines that more time is needed because of technical or economic feasibility problems. Secretary may extend base protection if conservation cover is maintained; allow limited haying and grazing; and prohibit any additional cost share, annual rental, or bonus payments. Secretary is required to study expiring contracts, make recommendations concerning treatment of lands subject to expiring contracts, and report to Congress by 12/31/93. Secretary may extend contracts up to 10 additional years and purchase easements if study indicates desirability. Wetlands Reserve Program (Subchapter B) Establishment: Secretary shall establish a wetland reserve program to assist owners of eligible lands in restoring and protecting wetlands Enrollment goal: To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall attempt to enroll 1 million acres through December 31, 1995 as follows: no more than 200,000 acres in 1991, 400,000 acres through 1992, 600,000 acres through 1993, and 800,000 acres through County enrollment limitation: Cropland acres count toward overall 25% county limitation for CRP, WRP, and the Environmental Easement Program. No more than 10% of a county's cropland may be placed under easements. Exception provisions same as for CRP Eligible land: Includes: (1) Farmed or converted wetlands, excluding wetlands where conversion was commenced after 12/23/85, and functionally dependent adjacent lands. The wetland value and likelihood of successful restoration must merit inclusion, taking cost into consideration. (2) Farmed wetland, adjoining land, and prior converted wetland in CRP with highest wetland functions and values, that are likely to return to production after they leave the program. (3) Other wetland on the farm, not otherwise eli gible, if functional value of easement increased. (4) Riparian corridors that link protected wetlands. (5) CRP timber stands and pastureland established to trees under CRP are not eligible. The Secretary is to consult with the Secretary of Interior at the local level on eligibility determinations Easement agreement: A 30-year or perpetual easement shall be established, unless a shorter maximum term is dictated under state law. Landowner agrees to implement wetland restoration and protection plan, and to provide access to wetland for management and inspection activities. Crop acreage base is permanently retired. If easement agreement is violated, Secretary may require easement to remain in force and full refund of all payments with interest. 5

7 14.54 Plans: Plans are to be developed by local SCS in concurrence with local FWS. If agreement cannot be reached within a reasonable period of time, state SCS decides in consultation with FWS Prohibited practices: Mowing or spraying is prohibited except as specified in plan, or when complying with federal or state noxious weed laws or with emergency pest treatment programs. Activities on adjacent lands of participants that diminish functional value of wetland under easement also are prohibited Permitted practices: Compatible economic uses including hunting, fishing, managed timber harvest, and periodic haying or grazing are permitted, if specifically permitted by plan Cost of easement: The cost of the easement shall be no more than the fair market value of the land minus the fair market value of the land encumbered by the easement Payment terms: Payments are to be made over 5- to 20-year period. Lump-sum payments are permitted for perpetual easements Cost sharing: 50 to 75 percent if not perpetual, otherwise 75 to 100 percent, of the cost of establishing conservation measures and practices and the protection of wetland functions and values, where appropriate and in the public interest Payment limitation: Not to exceed $50,000 per year for non-perpetual easements; no limit for perpetual easements. Secretary may waive limit for states, political subdivisions, or agencies that have approved special wetland and environmental easement enhancement programs Acceptability of offers: Secretary may consider several factors, including the extent to which wetland values are enhanced and environmental threats reduced, the productivity of the land to be enrolled, the likelihood of successful restoration, and costs Priority: Priority shall be given to offers that provide permanent wetland protection, and that protect and enhance habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife Exemption from sequester: Payments are to be exempt from automatic sequester Payment to heirs: Payments may continue to be made to heirs, even if $50,000 limit has been reached Ownership requirement: Land must be owned at least 1 year, unless acquired by will or succession, or before 1/1/90, or Secretary agrees that the land was not acquired for enrollment purposes Delegation of responsibilities: Secretary may delegate management of easements to other federal or state agencies Regulations: Secretary is to issue regulations within 180 days of enactment. Water Quality Incentive Program (Chapter 2) Establishment; enrollment goal: Secretary shall implement voluntary program to enroll 10 million acres through December 31, Secretary shall begin accepting contracts within 1 year of enactment. (This program appears to put in law objectives similar to the President's Water Quality Initiative. The latter initiative calls for voluntary cooperation in improving water quality. Technical assistance is provided by SCS, and financial assistance by ASCS through ACP. As partofthe initiative, USDA has begun demonstration projects, hydrologic unit projects, and special projects designed to accelerate implementation of water quality practices.) Agreements: 3- to 5-year agreements with owners and operators of eligible lands will be negotiated. Farmers agree to implement water quality plans developed by SCS. Acceptance of agreement shall not imply satisfaction of any state or federal law Wetland and wildlife habitat option: Secretary shall encourage farmers who obtain water quality plans to adopt agricultural production practices that protect and enhance wetlands or wildlife habitat. Fifty percent cost share of up to $1,500 will be provided over the contract period for approved practices Incentive payments: Payments will be made on a per-acre basis over 3 to 5 years, or in lump-sum if necessary for implementing a practice. Payments will be based on the amount necessary to encourage participation, additional costs incurred by producer, and production values forgone. Payments are limited to $3,500 per person per year Base and yield protection: Participants receive base acreage and payment yield protection for duration of contract Water quality practices; plans: Water quality protection practices are defined as those that will assist producers in complying with state and federal environmentallaws, and complement HEL conservation plans. Included will be agricultural production practices that promote efficient use of crop nutrients and pesticides, and water quality production practices that ensure safe storage, and handling of agricultural chemicals and animal waste. 6

8 Secretary shall provide notice that plans are available to the public upon request Eligible land: The following categories of land are included: ( 1) Critical cropland areas identified in Clean Water Act 319 plans. (2) Wellhead protection areas identified under Safe Drinking Water Act. (3) Karst areas with sinkholes. (4) Areas where agricultural non-point sources may adversely impact threatened or endangered species habitiat. (5) Other areas, in consultation with Secretary, as recommended by states, the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Dept. of Interior. (6) Other areas as determined by the Secretary Priority lands: Areas where agricultural production practices contribute to the potential for failure to meet water quality standards or goals. Secretary is to consult with states concerning priority areas Technical assistance; cost share: Secretary shall prepare technical guidance materials that may be used to assist producers in complying with state or federal environmental laws or goals. Upon request, Secretary shall provide technical assistance to agricultural producers in eligible areas, primarily through technical guidance materials developed by SCS. The Extension Service and the Agricultural Research Service may provide assistance as well. Claims or actions against officials based on technical assistance used for complying with environmental laws are not permitted. Secretary shall encourage participants to obtain costshare assistance under other federal, state, or local programs. However, incentive payments may not be made for practices receiving cost-share assistance under another federal program Demonstration and pilot programs: Secretary may enter into contracts with farmers who participate in demonstration or model farm program sponsored by governmental or non-profit entities. Secretary may establish pilot program in priority areas Report: Secretary shall provide interim report to Congress by 9130/92 and final report by 9/30/94. Environmental Easement Program (Chapter 3) Establishment: Secretary may enter into easement agreements with owners of eligible lands to ensure long-term protection of environmentally sensitive lands County enrollment limitation: Cropland acreage counts toward 25-percent overall cropland limitation for CRP, WRP, and the Environmental Easement Program and the 10-percent county limitation for WRP and the Environmental Easement Program. Exception provisions same as for CRP Enrollment goal: None specified Eligible lands: Lands enrolled in the CRP or Water Bank that are likely to return to production when contracts expire, other cropland that contains riparian corridors, critical habitat, or other environmentally sensitive areas where continued cropping prevents compliance with environmental goals. CRP timber stands and pasture planted to trees are not eligible. Existing CRP and Water Bank contracts may be terminated or modified upon enrollment Easement agreement: Permanent, or for maximum time allowed under state law. Base permanently retired Plans; acceptable practices: Natural resource conservation plan approved by Secretary in consultation with Secretary of Interior. Activities consistent with customary forestry practices shall not be prohibited. Commercial production of Christmas trees and nuts are not allowed; agricultural commodity production for wildlife only; haying and grazing only if included in plan Cost of easement: Payment for an easement will be for the difference in the value of the land with and without an easement but cannot exceed $250,000 in total. The maximum annual payment is $10,000. Secretary may waive limit for states, subdivisions, or agencies that have approved environmental easement enhancement programs Payment terms: Up to 10 annual payments Cost sharing: Secretary may pay up to 100 percent of cost of conservation practices Acceptability of offers: Secretary may consider extent goals achieved, productivity of the land, and environmental threat if production continued Exemption from sequester: Payments are exempt from automatic sequester Payments to heirs: Payments may continue to be made to heirs, even if $50,000 limit has been reached. (See Title XI, General Commodity Provisions.) Ownership requirement: Land must be owned at least 1 year, unless acquired by will or succession, before 1/1/90, or Secretary agrees that land was not acquired for enrollment. 7

9 Miscellaneous Provisions (Chapter 4) Monitoring and evaluation of conservation provisions: Secretary shall assess progress, perform onsite inspections, collect data, assess contributions to objectives, and report results to Congress by 6/30/93 pertaining to all programs and policies of the Title Appeals: Secretary shall maintain data concerning number and status of appeals pending in excess of 120 days or resolved under the Title State technical committees: Secretary shall establish committees, composed of federal and state officials, to assist in technical considerations relating to implementation of conservation provisions. Committees shall meet regularly to provide information, analysis, and recommendations. Committees shall be responsible for preparation of technical guides for wetland and wildlife habitat option of the WQIP within one year of 11/28/90. ASCS is to participate. Subtitle D - Other Conservation Measures Integrated Farm Management Program (Chapter 1) Establishment: Secretary shall establish a voluntary program to assist producers in adopting resourceconserving crop rotations by protecting participants' base acreage, payment yields, and applicable program payments Eligibility; Requirements: No environmental criteria for eligibility. Producer follows an approved integrated farm management plan, and enters into a 3- to 5-year contract, renewable upon mutual agreement. Producer must devote an annual average of 20 percent of crop acreage base over the contract period to a resource-conserving crop. Producer must comply with ARPs in effect for crop acreage base contracted Acreage: Secretary shall, to extent practicable, enroll 3 to 5 million acres of cropland through December 31, Plans: Specify acreage, crop rotation, farm operations and practices, productivity and profitability enhancement, soil fertility improvement; and water supply protection. Technical assistance provided by Secretary, in consultation with local conservation districts, state conservation committees, or other local authorities Resource-conserving crop: Legumes, legume-grass mixtures, legume-small grain mixtures, legume-grass-small grain mixtures, and alternative crops. Small grains are defined as not including malting barley or wheat, except for wheat interplanted with other small grains and not for harvest for human consumption. Legumes are defined as not including bean crops from which seeds are harvested Program rules; base, yield, and payment protection: Barley, oats, or wheat, as part of a resourceconserving crop, may not be harvested in kernel form. Except for acreage receiving cost share for perennial cover, acreage devoted to resource-conserving crops in resource-conserving rotations may be designated as ACR and up to 50% of such acreage may be hayed or grazed without restriction. Base, payment yields, and program payments shall not be reduced as a result of planting a resource-conserving crop as part of a resource-conserving crop rotation on payment acres Impacts on local economy: Secretary may restrict the total amount of crop acreage removed from production in an area, to limit adverse impacts on the local economy Tenant displacement: Plans that result in the involuntary displacement of tenants or lessees shall not be approved Haying and grazing restrictions: Producers forfeit program payments on land hayed or grazed during the 5-month restricted period, or if planted to a small grain crop and grazing occurs before grain is harvested in kernel form Base acre adjustments: Adjustments may be made to reflect resource-conserving crop rotations in effect prior to participation in the program. Adjustments may only be made to the extent that overall farm program payments would be reduced because of implementation of plans Under-planted acreage: Program payments shall not be made on traditionally under-planted acreage (e.g., 8 percent of the maximum payment acreage for 0-92 participants). Miscellaneous Provisions (Chapter 2) Resource Conservation and Development Act amendments: Extends program through 1995; increases areas from 225 to Noxious Weed Act amendments: Requires federal agencies to implement weed management plans under cooperative agreements with states. Cost share may be provided if a majority oflandowners in the area participate in a noxious weed management program Farmland Protection Policy Act amendments: Adds the words "to identify the quantity of farmland actually converted by federal programs." 8

10 Great Plains Conservation Program amendments: Extended to 2001; total authorization increased to $1 billion; more intensive management practices to be substituted for structural measures, where possible Composting: Appropriate methods of composting agricultural wastes and potential uses for such compost are to be identified. Secretary shall consider designating com posting as a farm conservation practice for cost-sharing. Secretary shall report to Congress within 6 months of 1990 farm bill enactment. Subtitle E- Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act; Farmland Protection Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act amendments: Adds water quality enhancement as an expressed purpose in plans. Requires that program sponsors be provided up to 50% of the acquisition costs of wetland easements Farms for the Future Act: Through FmHA, Secretary shall provide guarantees and interest rate subsidies for loans made by lending institutions to state trust funds for farmland preservation purposes. Vermont is the only eligible state, unless other states having agricultural land preservation program qualify, and funds are appropriated. Subtitle F- Administration of Environmental Programs Agricultural Environmental Quality Council: Secretary shall establish such a council, under direct authority of Secretary, that is responsible for carrying out conservation provisions, and for coordination and direction of enviommental policies. Council consists of Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources, Assistant Secretary for Science and Education, the Director of the Office of Agricultural Environmental Quality, and others as designated by the Secretary. The Council will be chaired by Secretary or designee. Director serves as Executive Director and may not serve as Chair Office of Environmental Quality: Such an office shall be established by the Secretary and shall be administered by the Agricultural Environmental Quality Council. Director, appointed by Secretary, assists, coordinates, and monitors USDA activities. In addition, the director shall make recommendations to the AEQC. Provides for liason personnel from EPA and Interior Environmental quality policy statement: Council shall develop statement. Director, subject to Council's approval, prepares plan to implement statement. Council prepares annual environmental quality report to Congress. Subtitle G -Water Quality Research, Education, and Coordination Soil and water activities: Explicit statement that SCS and ES shall aid in protecting and improving water quality. Impacts of HEL conservation plans on agriculture and water quality planning shall be determined. Secretary shall prepare annual report on SCS activities, accomplishments, and plans related to water contamination problems Water quality research, education and coordination: Requires Secretary to develop, implement, and maintain a coordinated, integrated, and comprehensive intra-agency program to protect waters from agricultural contamination State water quality coordination program: Requires the establishment of a water quality coordination program within each state, to serve as the focal point for coordinating the USDA's water programs with state agencies Water quality and nutrient management research: Requires USDA to undertake efforts to reduce sources of contamination, develop information and technologies, and monitor and evaluate contamination Repository of agriculture and ground water quality information: Secretary shall establish repository for all reports prepared and submitted, and shall report to Congress, within 270 days, on measures necessary to develop national data base on information relevant to water quality. Subtitle H - Pesticides Pesticide recordkeeping: Certified applicators of restricted use pesticides are required to maintain records. Violators subject to fines. Requires survey of records and development of data base. Secretary consults with EPA Agrichemcials and water policy: USDA is named principal federal agency responsible for providing education and technical assistance, and for conducting research program for users and dealers of agrichemicals. ASCS is to participate. 9

Government Conservation Programs

Government Conservation Programs Government Conservation Programs Policy Resolutions Webinar 2017 Illinois Farm Bureau Governmental Affairs & Commodities Division Lyndsey Ramsey Assoc. Director of Natural and Environmental Resources CURRENT

More information

The Conservation Reserve Program

The Conservation Reserve Program The Conservation Reserve Program James B. Johnson, Montana State University Richard T. Clark, University of Nebraska Background The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is a voluntary long-term cropland

More information

CC338 Trees and Shrubs in the Conservation Reserve Program

CC338 Trees and Shrubs in the Conservation Reserve Program University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension May 2014 CC338 Trees and Shrubs in the Conservation

More information

COST SHARE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY

COST SHARE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY SCS 2010 12 COST SHARE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY Jennifer L. Peterson, Program Specialist, Water Quality Larry A. Redmon, Professor

More information

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION AND STATE OF NEW YORK

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION AND STATE OF NEW YORK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION AND STATE OF NEW YORK IMPLEMENTING THE CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM This Agreement is between the U.S. Department

More information

Recommendations to Enhance Wildlife Benefits of the 2018 Farm Bill

Recommendations to Enhance Wildlife Benefits of the 2018 Farm Bill T he Farm Bill is the largest source of federal funds for habitat conservation on private lands. Twothirds of land in the lower 48 states is privately owned, and more than 40 percent of that is managed

More information

CC362 Integrated Farm Management Program Option

CC362 Integrated Farm Management Program Option University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension May 04 CC6 Integrated Farm Management Program

More information

CC198 The Food and Agriculture Act of 1965

CC198 The Food and Agriculture Act of 1965 University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension April 2014 CC198 The Food and Agriculture

More information

CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS

CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS Wes Harris Special Projects Coordinator Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development The University of Georgia wlharris@uga.edu TITLE II FARM SECURITY AND RURAL INVESTMENT

More information

Riparian Forest Buffer Panel (Bay Area Incentive Programs)

Riparian Forest Buffer Panel (Bay Area Incentive Programs) Program Buffer Incentive Program Virginia Agricultural BMP Cost- Share Program Virginia Agricultural BMP Cost- Share Program Practice Woodland Buffer Filter Area Loafing Lot Management System Incentive,

More information

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local 1 The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's principal agency for providing free conservation technical assistance to private landowners, conservation districts,

More information

The USDA. Farm Bill:

The USDA. Farm Bill: The USDA Farm Bill: What is in it for woodland owners? Why is the 2008 Farm Bill important to me? As the owner of forested property or woodlands, you may qualify for landowner assistance under the 2008

More information

ANALYSIS OF CCRP S RECORD BREAKING ENROLLMENT NSAC SPECIAL REPORTS

ANALYSIS OF CCRP S RECORD BREAKING ENROLLMENT NSAC SPECIAL REPORTS ANALYSIS OF CCRP S RECORD BREAKING ENROLLMENT NSAC SPECIAL REPORTS FEBRUARY 217 KEYWORDS AND PROGRAMS: CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM, CONTINUOUS CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM, CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT

More information

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions Conserving Natural Resources on Colorado s Privately Owned Farmland Farm Bill

More information

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Highlights of various programs. Wetlands Reserve program (WRP)

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Highlights of various programs. Wetlands Reserve program (WRP) Funding Sources: (USDA) United States Department of Agriculture The following is a listing of the various funding sources offered to farmers by the USDA. Each source shows the eligibility, what it will

More information

National Association of State Foresters (NASF) 2014 Farm Bill Crosswalk 1

National Association of State Foresters (NASF) 2014 Farm Bill Crosswalk 1 (NASF) 1 NASF Farm Bill Platform Support consolidation of certain Conservation Title programs if the adjustment facilitates forest landowner participation in those programs, improves agency program delivery,

More information

Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands. Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015

Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands. Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015 Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015 Food Security Act of 1985 1985 Farm Bill Created Wetland

More information

The Fight against Soil Erosion in Minnesota-the Conservation Reserve Program at the Front Line

The Fight against Soil Erosion in Minnesota-the Conservation Reserve Program at the Front Line The Fight against Soil Erosion in Minnesota-the Conservation Reserve Program at the Front Line Christine Baker Within the U.S., the federal government s biggest weapon against soil erosion is the Conservation

More information

Efforts at the federal and state levels are underway

Efforts at the federal and state levels are underway Agriculture and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY: Controlling Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution A L A B A M A A & M A N D A U B U R N U N I V E R S I T I E S ANR-790-4.2.2 The Rural Environment And NPS Pollution

More information

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection USDA Farm Service Agency JANUARY 2003 Governor McCallum

More information

Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association

Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association Springfield, IL July 14 17, 2003 Illinois Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP): A Model for Watershed Restoration Debbie Bruce Debbie

More information

A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy

A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy Roger Claassen Economic Research Service US Department of Agriculture The views expressed are those of the author and cannot necessarily be attributed

More information

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014 The 2014 Farm Bill Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014 Differences Between the 2008 and 2014 Farm Bill Conservation Programs 2 Reauthorizes Programs from the 2008 Farm Bill

More information

CONSIDERATIONS WHEN BIDDING CROPLAND INTO CRP. DEPARTMENTAL SPECIAL REPORT #24 September James B. Johnson Walter E. Zidack

CONSIDERATIONS WHEN BIDDING CROPLAND INTO CRP. DEPARTMENTAL SPECIAL REPORT #24 September James B. Johnson Walter E. Zidack Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University DEPARTMENTAL SPECIAL REPORT #24 September 1997 CONSIDERATIONS WHEN BIDDING CROPLAND INTO CRP James B. Johnson Walter E. Zidack

More information

The Purpose and Scope of this Guidance

The Purpose and Scope of this Guidance Introduction The nation s aquatic resources are among its most valuable assets. While environmental protection programs in the United States have successfully improved water quality during the past 25

More information

Green Infrastructure/Biodiversity Supporting Programs

Green Infrastructure/Biodiversity Supporting Programs Green Infrastructure/Biodiversity Supporting Programs Prepared for Biodiversity Initiative and Livable Delaware Green Infrastructure Subcommittee FINAL 2003 D R A F T PREFACE Green Infrastructure is Delaware

More information

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE. TITLE: Final Guidance - Substantive Revision Agricultural Land Preservation Policy

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE. TITLE: Final Guidance - Substantive Revision Agricultural Land Preservation Policy DOCUMENT ID: 012-0700-002 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE TITLE: Final Guidance - Substantive Revision Agricultural Land Preservation Policy EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 2005 AUTHORITY:

More information

Conservation Corner. Announcements. New Website

Conservation Corner. Announcements. New Website Conservation Corner Current Newsletter: Volume 4, Issue 2 Looking for previous issues? View the archive View as a PDF (printer friendly version) Conservation Corner 4-2 Announcements UofA Division of Agriculture

More information

2014 Farm Bill Programs

2014 Farm Bill Programs 2014 Farm Bill Programs The 2014 Farm Bill was enacted on February 7, 2014. NRCS offers voluntary Farm Bill conservation program that benefit both agricultural producers and the environment. Some program

More information

2014 Farm Bill Training October 14-17, Agricultural Risk Coverage & Price Loss Coverage. Acreage History Update

2014 Farm Bill Training October 14-17, Agricultural Risk Coverage & Price Loss Coverage. Acreage History Update 2014 Farm Bill Training October 14-17, 2014 Agricultural Risk Coverage & Price Loss Coverage Acreage History Update ARC/PLC Process ARC/PLC Program Process has three PARTS: Update: Owner(s) choice to reallocate

More information

Figure Farm Bill Spending, June 2017 Congressional Budget Office 10-Year Projections

Figure Farm Bill Spending, June 2017 Congressional Budget Office 10-Year Projections FARM BILL The farm bill is omnibus, multi-year authorizing legislation that governs an array of agricultural and food programs. It is typically renewed about every five years. The 2014 Farm Bill contains

More information

2014 Farm Bill Conference Report Analysis

2014 Farm Bill Conference Report Analysis 2014 Farm Bill Conference Report Analysis The final 2014 farm bill isn t perfect, but overall, it is a very strong bill that supports conservation, wildlife, and renewable energy and includes critical

More information

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the CRCA Planning Policy. 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to summarize the recommendations

More information

HOUSE BILL lr0052

HOUSE BILL lr0052 M HOUSE BILL lr00 By: Chair, Environment and Transportation Committee (By Request Departmental Environment) Introduced and read first time: February, 0 Assigned to: Environment and Transportation Committee

More information

Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel

Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel Chesapeake Bay Program Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel Introduction Findings Land Use-Specific Findings On Agricultural Land On Forested Land On Developed and Developing Lands Recommendations

More information

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP Environmental Qualities Incentives Program The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) is a voluntary conservation program. It supports production agriculture and environmental

More information

1979 WHEAT AND FEED GRAIN SET ASIDE PROGRAM:

1979 WHEAT AND FEED GRAIN SET ASIDE PROGRAM: ESO 585 1979 WHEAT AND FEED GRAIN SET ASIDE PROGRAM: OPPORTUNITIES AND RULES DEPART~~T OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS ~~D RURAL SOCIOLOGY COOPERATIVE EXTENSIO~ SERVICE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY, 1979 The

More information

USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id)

USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id) USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id) Animal Waste Management Systems or Waste Storage Facility (840, 23) Practices designed for proper handling, storage,

More information

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010 Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection

More information

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND 2010 Legislative Session

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND 2010 Legislative Session DR- COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND 0 Legislative Session Bill No. CB--0 Chapter No. Proposed and Presented by The Chairman (by request Planning Board) Introduced by Council Members

More information

USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation

USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation USDA-NRCS The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) was originally the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) SCS Created

More information

2018 Farm Bill- House Proposal

2018 Farm Bill- House Proposal 2018 Farm Bill- House Proposal The text of the legislation, summary materials and supporting documents shared by the House Agriculture Committee can be found here: https://agriculture.house.gov/farmbill/.

More information

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative GLASI GLASI Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative Priority Subwatershed Project Wigle Creek Priority Subwatershed Project Essex Region Conservation Authority Up to $75,000 per eligible farm business

More information

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC Page 1 of 12 FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC CHAPTER VEGETATION ECOLOGY Amendment No.: 2000-2008-1 Effective Date: February 13, 2008 Duration: This amendment is effective

More information

IC Chapter 19. Abandoned Mines

IC Chapter 19. Abandoned Mines IC 14-34-19 Chapter 19. Abandoned Mines IC 14-34-19-1 Federal money Sec. 1. (a) Money received by the department from the federal government for use in the restoration of abandoned mine land under this

More information

Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program

Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program CREP Overview Offshoot of the country's largest private-lands environmental improvement program - the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). Voluntary land retirement program Helps agricultural producers

More information

EXHIBIT "B" LAND USE REGULATIONS MARK TWAIN LAKE

EXHIBIT B LAND USE REGULATIONS MARK TWAIN LAKE EXHIBIT "B" LAND USE REGULATIONS MARK TWAIN LAKE The Lessee agrees to conduct all farming operations in accordance with the land use practices set forth and in accordance with an approved annual land use

More information

A Landowner s Guide to C o n s e rvation Buffer Incentive Pro g r a m s in Pennsylvania

A Landowner s Guide to C o n s e rvation Buffer Incentive Pro g r a m s in Pennsylvania A Landowner s Guide to C o n s e rvation Buffer Incentive Pro g r a m s in Pennsylvania Purpose of This Guide This guide is a compilation of the major federal, state and private voluntary conservation

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 609

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 609 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-374 HOUSE BILL 609 AN ACT TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIRS AND OTHER WATER SUPPLY RESOURCES, TO PROVIDE THAT FUNDS

More information

Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 Summary

Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 Summary Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 Summary The Farm Bill Prepared by the NAWG Staff Shortly after the 2018 Farm Bill conference report was released the NAWG staff prepared a summary of the bill regarding

More information

Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives o Describe functions lost at impact site o Describe functions to be gained at mitigation site o Describe

More information

Cost Share Assistance for Landowners Dawn Kier, White Earth Tribal Conservation District Ed Musielewicz, USDA-NRCS District Conservationist Becker County Adam Woltjer, USDA-NRCS White Earth Tribal Liaison

More information

2014 Farm Bill Highlights for Wyoming Livestock Operators. Nicole Ballenger John Hewlett Agricultural and Applied Economics and UW Extension

2014 Farm Bill Highlights for Wyoming Livestock Operators. Nicole Ballenger John Hewlett Agricultural and Applied Economics and UW Extension 2014 Farm Bill Highlights for Wyoming Livestock Operators Nicole Ballenger John Hewlett Agricultural and Applied Economics and UW Extension Background Real name is The Agricultural Act of 2014 discussion

More information

2002 Farm Bill v Farm Bill Energy Provisions

2002 Farm Bill v Farm Bill Energy Provisions 2002 Farm Bill v- Energy Provisions Biobased Markets Program Established new program for preferred purchase of biobased products by Federal agencies, modeled on existing program for purchase of recycled

More information

Base Information and Verification

Base Information and Verification Base Information and Verification 1 Base Information and Verification Needed Information Needed Information Most long-time commodity program participants will have filed annual acreage reports with FSA

More information

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT A SYST FOR FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT LANDOWNERS. FAS 115 October 2014 New

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT A SYST FOR FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT LANDOWNERS. FAS 115 October 2014 New FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT A SYST FOR FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT LANDOWNERS FAS 115 October 2014 New FWH A Syst System Improvement Action Plan Risk question List high-risk practice(s) from FWH A Syst

More information

Site Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report

Site Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report Site Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report Background The New York State Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is a collaborative effort between the USDA and the State of New York. The goal of

More information

SENATE BILL 610 A BILL ENTITLED. Natural Resources Forest Conservation Act Standards and Requirements

SENATE BILL 610 A BILL ENTITLED. Natural Resources Forest Conservation Act Standards and Requirements M SENATE BILL lr CF lr By: Senators Young, Benson, Conway, Currie, Feldman, Ferguson, Guzzone, Kagan, Kelley, King, Lee, Madaleno, Nathan Pulliam, Pinsky, Ramirez, Robinson, and Zucker Introduced and read

More information

Agroforestry: Creating Opportunities for Productive Conservation

Agroforestry: Creating Opportunities for Productive Conservation Agroforestry: Creating Opportunities for Productive Conservation Women, Food and Agriculture Network Nebraska City, NE November 4-5, 2016 Outline What is agroforestry? An overview of agroforestry practices

More information

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations Chapter 324 Section 324-1 Environmental Planning Criteria Protection of Groundwater Recharge Areas (A) Purpose and Intent. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. 12-2-8 and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR),

More information

Maryland s s Critical Area Program

Maryland s s Critical Area Program Maryland s s Critical Area Program Overview of the Critical Area Program Highlights of 2008 Legislative Session Cecil County Land Use Alliance May 29, 2008 What Is the Critical Area Program? Based on Chesapeake

More information

Agriculture Conservation Programs: A Scorecard

Agriculture Conservation Programs: A Scorecard Order Code RL32940 Agriculture Conservation Programs: A Scorecard Updated May 9, 2008 Tadlock Cowan Analyst in Natural Resources and Rural Development Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Renée

More information

Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies

Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies Associate Martha Noble Senior Policy National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Founded 1988 National coalition of 84 grassroots family

More information

This page intentionally left blank

This page intentionally left blank Monterey County has elected to include an as part of the General Plan. Agriculture consisting of crop farming and livestock grazing is the largest industry in the County and contributes a significant amount

More information

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards SECTION 6 EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS 6.1 INTRODUCTION The policies of this section shall apply during construction and until permanent measures are in place following construction as described herein, unless

More information

CC134 Questions and Answers on the Acreage Reserve and Price Support Programs

CC134 Questions and Answers on the Acreage Reserve and Price Support Programs University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 6-1956 CC134 Questions and Answers on the

More information

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative Helping People Help the Land www.nrcs.usda.gov Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative Overview To improve the health of the Mississippi River Basin, including water quality and wildlife

More information

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development Subject Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program Policy Compiled by - Branch Biodiversity Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development Date

More information

2014 Farm Bill. FACT SHEET March Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

2014 Farm Bill. FACT SHEET March Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICE AGENCY 2014 Farm Bill Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years FACT SHEET March 2016 OVERVIEW The Noninsured Crop Disaster

More information

Clean Water ~ Green Spaces. Rural and Agricultural Landowner Water Quality & Natural Areas Restoration Grant Program Guidelines

Clean Water ~ Green Spaces. Rural and Agricultural Landowner Water Quality & Natural Areas Restoration Grant Program Guidelines Clean Water ~ Green Spaces Rural and Agricultural Landowner Water Quality & Natural Areas Restoration Grant Program Guidelines Revised September 2018 ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES All projects must be pre-approved

More information

Forest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines

Forest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines Forest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines Second Edition September 2005 USDA Forest Service State & Private Forestry Cooperative Forestry Forest Stewardship Program National Standards

More information

Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects

Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1 Scott Malcolm smalcolm@ers.usda.gov 10 Marcel Aillery maillery@ers.usda.gov Federal mandates for biofuel production promote expanded crop

More information

EAST TORRANCE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. LONG RANGE PLAN July 1, 2009 June 30, 2019

EAST TORRANCE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. LONG RANGE PLAN July 1, 2009 June 30, 2019 EAST TORRANCE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT LONG RANGE PLAN July 1, 2009 June 30, 2019 INTRODUCTION The East Torrance Soil and Water Conservation District covers 1,142,028 acres of land in Torrance

More information

Current Report. Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: CR

Current Report. Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: CR Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report CR-23 39 Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: 28-9 Damona Doye Regents Professor and Extension Economist Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are

More information

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROJECT: COUNTY: NAME OF LANDOWNER: CELL/OFFICE PHONE: NAME OF FARM / SITE MANAGER: CELL/OFFICE PHONE: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RS21779 Updated December 13, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Farm Commodity Programs: Direct Payments, Counter-Cyclical Payments, and Marketing Loans Jim Monke

More information

LIVESTOCK FORAGE DISASTER PROGRAM

LIVESTOCK FORAGE DISASTER PROGRAM LIVESTOCK FORAGE DISASTER PROGRAM UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE CAUTION: This article is intended for educational purposes, only. It does not constitute legal advice. Nor is it a substitute for

More information

The Agricultural Act of Farm Service Agency Programs.

The Agricultural Act of Farm Service Agency Programs. The Agricultural Act of 2014 Farm Service Agency Programs www.fsa.usda.gov/ne The Agricultural Act of 2014 1 2014 Farm Bill 2014 Farm Bill repealed Direct Payments Strengthened the Farm Program Safety

More information

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014 Conservation Choices Your guide to conservation and environmental farming practices. Conservation Choices These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... The practice reduces soil erosion

More information

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT A SYST FOR FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT LANDOWNERS FAS 115 October 2017 Major Revision Destroy Old For MAEAP Verification: Contact the MAEAP Office at the Michigan Department

More information

August 2, Dear Chairman Roberts, Chairman Conaway, Ranking Member Stabenow and Ranking Member Peterson:

August 2, Dear Chairman Roberts, Chairman Conaway, Ranking Member Stabenow and Ranking Member Peterson: August 2, 2018 Dear Chairman Roberts, Chairman Conaway, Ranking Member Stabenow and Ranking Member Peterson: The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) applauds you for your hard work in moving

More information

1. Executive Summary. Delaware Chesapeake Riparian Forest Buffer Initiative Final Report

1. Executive Summary. Delaware Chesapeake Riparian Forest Buffer Initiative Final Report Delaware Chesapeake Riparian Forest Buffer Initiative Final Report 1. Executive Summary The Chesapeake Bay watershed covers about one third of Delaware s land area, 769 square miles, and includes half

More information

District 12 - Lucas County Natural Resources Conservation Council Scoring Methodology =========================

District 12 - Lucas County Natural Resources Conservation Council Scoring Methodology ========================= Project Name: Applicant: Project Scoring Summary 0 Part II Score: 0 of 44 points possible 0 Part III Score: 0 of 40 points possible 0 Part IV Score: 0 of 17 points possible Total Project Score: 0 of 101

More information

The Biomass Crop Assistance Program: Orchestrating the U.S. Government s First Significant Step to Incentivize Biomass Production

The Biomass Crop Assistance Program: Orchestrating the U.S. Government s First Significant Step to Incentivize Biomass Production The Biomass Crop Assistance Program: Orchestrating the U.S. Government s First Significant Step to Incentivize Biomass Production Jody M. Endres, J.D., M.A. Senior Regulatory Associate The Energy Biosciences

More information

Subject: Conservation; water resources; Lake Champlain; total maximum 5. Statement of purpose: This bill proposes to amend requirements for 7

Subject: Conservation; water resources; Lake Champlain; total maximum 5. Statement of purpose: This bill proposes to amend requirements for 7 2010 Page 1 1 2 3 4 H.509 Introduced by Representative Deen of Westminster Referred to Committee on Date: Subject: Conservation; water resources; Lake Champlain; total maximum 5 6 daily load plan Statement

More information

MDA BMP Functional Equivalents. Update WQGIT 11/12/13

MDA BMP Functional Equivalents. Update WQGIT 11/12/13 MDA BMP Functional Equivalents Update WQGIT 11/12/13 Executive Order 12508 In January of 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order (EO) 12508 on the Chesapeake Bay. May 12, 2010, the EO Strategy was

More information

Current Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)

Current Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) File B1-60 September 2013 www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm Managed Haying or Grazing of CRP Acres Current Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) rules allow landowners with active CRP contracts to periodically

More information

Conservation and Environmental Enhancement in the 2002 Farm Bill. Purdue University. May CES-344.

Conservation and Environmental Enhancement in the 2002 Farm Bill. Purdue University. May CES-344. Annexe États-Unis 1: Annexe États-Unis 2: Annexe États-Unis 3: Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web. Soil and Water Conservation Issues. Updated May 17, 2002. Jeffrey A. Zinn, Resources,

More information

Maryland s Water Quality Trading Program. Phase II Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland

Maryland s Water Quality Trading Program. Phase II Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland Maryland s Water Quality Trading Program Phase II Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland Compensation ($) Buyer Nutrient Credits Seller John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture Agricultural

More information

Sustainable Agricultural Land Tenure: Issues for Iowa

Sustainable Agricultural Land Tenure: Issues for Iowa Sustainable Agricultural Land Tenure: Issues for Iowa Prof. Neil D. Hamilton, director Agricultural Law Center, Drake University, Opperman Chair of Law Topics to Consider 1. 2008 Farm Bill provisions http://agriculture.senate.gov/

More information

The Contributions Approach to Establishing Equitable Pasture Lease Agreements Stocking Rates

The Contributions Approach to Establishing Equitable Pasture Lease Agreements Stocking Rates PB 1816-D The Contributions Approach to Establishing Equitable Pasture Lease Agreements This publication provides management information and guidelines for landlords and tenants to follow when negotiating

More information

A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2

A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2 A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2 Robin Reid (robinreid@ksu.edu), G.A. Art Barnaby (barnaby@ksu.edu), Rich Llewelyn (rvd@ksu.edu) and Mykel Taylor (mtaylor@ksu.edu)

More information

A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2

A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2 A First Look at the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill 2018)-Version 2 Robin Reid (robinreid@ksu.edu), G.A. Art Barnaby (barnaby@ksu.edu), Rich Llewelyn (rvd@ksu.edu) and Mykel Taylor (mtaylor@ksu.edu)

More information

CBP Implementation Plan

CBP Implementation Plan York County Conservation District CBP Implementation Plan March 2014 York County Conservation District 118 Pleasant Acres Road York, PA 17402 Phone: (717) 840-7430 www.yorkccd.org 1 Table of Contents Introduction

More information

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE Introduction These Guidelines are intended to summarize the requirements

More information

Issues and Economics Involved in Breaking Out CRP Land

Issues and Economics Involved in Breaking Out CRP Land Issues and Economics Involved in Breaking Out CRP Land Dr. Michael Brady IMPACT Center School of Economic Sciences Washington State University bradym@wsu.edu The Issue and Questions Farmland exiting CRP

More information

HARDIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PRODUCTIVITY GUIDELINES

HARDIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PRODUCTIVITY GUIDELINES HARDIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PRODUCTIVITY GUIDELINES 1. To qualify for an agricultural use or timber use, special valuation, a property must be currently devoted principally (the most important or

More information

Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan

Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan Presented by John Small and Nora Schlenker, Anchor QEA 1 Agenda Welcome and Follow-up from Last Meeting Protection and Enhancement Strategies Goals and Measurable

More information

Table 1. Relationship between critical areas and key functions. Shaded areas represent functions associated with each critical area. Storage.

Table 1. Relationship between critical areas and key functions. Shaded areas represent functions associated with each critical area. Storage. Flow Storage Nutrients Temperature Bacteria Contaminants Cowlitz County Voluntary Stewardship Program 4 Goals, Benchmarks, Strategies and Indicators 4.1 Approach Goals and Benchmarks Critical Areas Functions

More information

Agricultural Districts in Ohio

Agricultural Districts in Ohio Agricultural Districts in Ohio CDFS-1268-99 Land Use Series John D. Rohrer What is an Agricultural District? An agricultural district provides protection against nuisance suits over farm operations, deferment

More information