SELECTION IN HEREFORD CATTLE. SELECTION INTENSITY, GENERATION INTERVAL AND INDEXES IN RETROSPECT
|
|
- Christian Taylor
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I. SELECTION IN HEREFORD CATTLE. SELECTION INTENSITY, GENERATION INTERVAL AND INDEXES IN RETROSPECT L. N. Nwakalor 1, J. S. Brinks 2 and G. V. Richardson 3 Colorado State University, Fort Collins ABSTRACT Selection intensity and generation interval were evaluated in a Hereford cattle herd made up of 14 inbred lines and 14 linecross groups corresponding to the lines of inbred sires at the Suan Juan Basin Research Center, Hesperus, Colorado. Selection indexes practiced were calculated in retrospect. Analyses of the records collected from 1946 through 1973 involved weaning weight (WW) and postweaning traits in males and females. Analyses by line were performed for the inbreds, while pooled analyses were done on the inbred and linecross populations. From records of 1,239 calves weaned, age of sire averaged 3.75 yr compared with 4.52 yr for age of dam, showing faster generation turnover for sires than for dams. Generation interval determined as actual age of midparent was 4.13 yr. Selection applied for WW, evaluated as annual selection differentials within inbred lines and then pooled over all lines, averaged.55 standard deviations (a)/generation for sires. For females, selection was much less intense. Midparent selection differential amounted to.33o/ generation. For sires, pooled standardized selection differentials per generation over all lines during the postweaning gain period were.49cr,.46tr,.400, -.20e, -.10o and.69o, respectively, for initial weight, final weight, feed consumed, feed efficiency (FE, unadjusted and adjusted) and average daily gain (ADG). Selection of females for postweaning traits was not intense. Selection index actually practiced in retrospect for sires was: I S =.4461 (WW) (FE) (ADG). The indexes for dams included WW, 12-mo weight (12W), 18-mo weight (18W), mature spring weight (SPW) and mature fall weight (FAW) and were: for inbred dams, I D =.1824 (WW) (12W) (18W) (SPW) (FAW); for linecross dams, I D =.2693 (WW) (12W) (18W) (SPW) (FAW). The corresponding index selection differentials were.818,.203 and.209. Sire index selection differentials represent about 79% of the total selection differentials. (Key Words: Hereford, Cattle, Selection Intensity, Indexes, Generation Interval.) Introduction Genetic response per year to selection depends on the extent to which parents deviate from average, on the average genetic variation and covariation of all traits directly or indirectly related to traits under selection, and on the generation interval between selected generations. In any population the smaller the proportion of animals selected as parents, the greater will be the selection differential provided that those selected come from the upper segment of 1Present address: Dept. of Anita, Sci., Univ. of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. 2Professor, Dept. of Anita. Sci., Colorado State Univ. 3Biomerrician, ARS, USDA, Fort Collins, CO Received March 21, Accepted October 30, the merit scale for the trait involved. Longevity in parental stock will increase the generation interval, but at the same time, increase the accuracy of the predicted breeding value from the additional data. This study evaluates the intensity of selection practiced for weaning weight and postweaning traits and the generation interval in males and females at San Juan Basin Research Center Hereford herd. Selection indexes also were calculated in retrospect. Materials and Methods Breeding System. The breeding project was started in 1946 at the San Juan Basin Research Center, Hesperus with the primary purpose of studying the prospects for the utilization of within-breed heterosis in commercial beef production. Over the years 14 established inbred lines of Hereford cattle were used in reciprocal crossing to produce 14 Iinecross groups corre- 927 J. Anim. Sci :
2 928 NWAKALOR ET AL. sponding to the lines of inbred sires. Linecross cows were mated concurrently to inbred line herd sires to produce linecross progeny. By 1973 the average inbreeding levels in the herd were 25.5 and 36.3% for dam and calf. The mating scheme used to initiate most of the lines was sire x daughter mating. Detailed information on line formation has been given by Anonymous (1975). Cattle Management and Selection of Replacements. Cows were grazed on range throughout the year and fed supplemental hay from late December until early or mid-may. They were placed in individual sire breeding pastures during the breeding season. Until 1967 the breeding season extended 90 d, from early June to early September. Beginning in 1968 the season was reduced to 60 d, from mid-may to mid-july. At the end of the breeding season, sires were removed and cows and calves were run together on native range until weaning in late October to early November at an average age of approximately 200 d. Calves were not creep fed. All bulls were retained uncastrated on pasture; after weaning they were given a 2- to 4-wk adjustment period before they were individually fed during a 140-d performance test. Feeding of the bulls was done in the late afternoon and early morning hours with the bulls chained all night and allowed free exercise during the day. Water was available and daily feed records were kept on each animal. The bulls were weighed on two successive days to establish accurate initial test weights and final weights. All bulls were observed closely for sickness, vaccinated against warts and treated for external parasites. They were retested for tuberculosis and brucellosis during the test period. A semen evaluation and physical examination for breeding soundness was performed on each bull at the completion of test. Until 1971, about one-third of the heifers were retained at weaning for breeding and were fed to gain approximately.45 kg/d through the winter. Replacements were selected primarily on age, weight and need for replacements within specific line or linecross groups. Selected heifers were exposed to bulls at about 15 mo of age. Cows were culled based on age, health, soundness and the results of pregnancy examinations, with most open cows being culled. Beginning in the fall of 1969 some emphasis was placed on most probable producing ability values of cows based on calves' weaning weight. Selection of herd sires was done within lines. Before 1956, selection of replacement inbred bulls was based on an index, giving equal weight to adjusted weaning weight, feed efficiency on test and yearling grade. From 1956 through 1966, selection was on the index: I -- adjusted weaning weight + 50 (postweaning daily gain). Beginning in 1967, bulls were selected on preweaning and postweaning growth performance. Selected bulls were usually first used as yearlings and were used for one to several years depending on whether superior younger bulls of the same line were available. Performance Traits. Weaning weight (WW) was adjusted for sex, age and age of dam. Additional adjustments were made for inbreeding of calf and dam. Adjustment factors used for WW were those derived for the herd from an earlier study of the same herd by Harwin (1963) shown in table 1. Adjustment factors for postweaning traits were calculated from the present study. Postweaning traits of males include initial test weight (IW), final weight (FW), feed consumed (FC), feed efficiency (FE) unadjusted and adjusted to midweight on test and average daily gain (ADG) over the test period. Postweaning traits of females comprise gain from weaning to 12 mo, 12-mo weight (12W, adjusted to 365 d), gain from 12 to 18 mo, 18-mo weight (18W, adjusted to 550 d) and mature weights in spring (SPW), summer (SUW) and fall (FAW). Mature cow weight data were analyzed by least-squares procedures for the effects of year of record, age of cow when weight was taken and lactation status. Age classes ranged from 1 to 10+ and lactation status from 1 to 4 (wet-wet, wet-dry, dry-wet and dry-dry, representing whether or not a cow had a calf in the preceding year and in the year weight record was taken). The weight-by-age class constants for cow weights taken three times each year showed that cows continue to gain weight until 8 yr of age, and then decline slightly thereafter, similar to the pattern shown by the Miles City study of Brinks et al. (1962). Year of record, age of cow and lactation status all had effects (P.01) on female weights and the individual weights from ages of 2 through 10+ were adjusted for the effects using the least-squares constants. Adjustment for age of cow was made to 8-yr-old equivalent while lactation status was adjusted to a wet-wet (lactation in 2 consecutive yr)basis.
3 SELECTION INTENSITY IN HEREFORD CATTLE 929 TABLE 1. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (KG) USED FOR WEANING WEIGHT Sex of calf Effect Bull Heifer Sex Age of dam 2 yr old yr old yr old yr old and over 0 0 Age of calf Inbreeding of calf (Fc) (per 1% Fc) Inbreeding of dam (Fd) (per 1% Fd) Adjustment to a constant age of 205 d. Add gain/d if under 205 d. Stibtract gain/d if over 205 d Average mature weights were obtained for individual cows as the average of weights taken from 2 to 10+ yr of age after adjustments. Evaluation of Selection Applied. Selection applied was measured as the average annual selection differential of parents (Ap), which is the difference in mean performance of selected parents compared with the average of the unselected group from which they came, divided by the average age of parents (P,) when offspring were born. Annual selection differentials were computed within lines separately for sires (AS) and dams (AD). Because each sex of parent contributes equally to the genetic composition of the progeny in the next generation, the net selection differential was the average of sire and dam. Formulas used for calculating annual selection differentials were presented by Dickerson and Hazel (1944), Dickerson et al. (1954), Rendel and Robertson (1950) and Brinks et al. (1965). The formulas that account for sequential culling over years of animals from the herd are: ~nis i AS- NA' AD- ~njdj NA' AS + AD AP and ~nia i + Y~njAj 2N or the average age of parents when the offspring were born. Terms ni and nj are the number of progeny by a particular sire and dam, respectively, in a given year; s i and dj are the superiority or inferiority of a particular sire and dam measured as the deviation from the mean of the unselected group in which they were born; and N is the number of progeny in a given year. Only those animals whose sires and dams were born within the respective lines (apart from foundation parents) were used in calculating selection differentials (SD). Foundation animals were assigned a SD of zero and an age at the time offspring were born equal to the number of years after the line was started for calculating their contribution to annual SD. Parents born at the time the line was started or later were assigned their actual ages. Annual SD were computed separately for inbred sires, inbred females and linecross females. Values for respective lines, weighted by the number of offspring contributed by each line, were pooled to obtain the overall annual SD for the herd. Mean annual SD was taken as the unweighted average over all years. Selection differentials were not calculated for the early years of each line when all of either male or female parents were foundation animals and
4 930 NWAKALOR ET AL. performance records were not available on them. Selection Indexes in Retrospect. The correlation matrix multiplication procedure of Harvey and Bearden (1962) was used to compute the selection indexes actually employed in retrospect. The phenotypic correlation matrix (as the independent variables) was equated to the SD in standard units (s i) matrix (as the dependent variable). Solution of the equations yielded a i (the relative weight expressed as standard partial regression coefficients) for the indexes actually practiced. Indexes so obtained give each characteristic the average emphasis it actually had during selection. Selection differentials in standard measure for the index actually practiced was calculated from the formula (Harvey and Bearden, 1962): I = (als I + azs ansn) 1/2. The phenotypic correlations used in this study were average estimates obtained for different traits from the studies of Armstrong (1964), Brinks et al. (1964), Petty and Cartwright (1966) and Preston and Willis (1974). Analysis by Line Results Age of Parents. Average ages of parents by line calculated from WW records show that in 8 of the 12 lines used, average age of dams was greater than that of sires, indicating faster replacement rates for sires. Ages of sires and dams in lines 2, 6, 7 and 14 suggest slightly more rapid replacement rates of dams than of sires, resulting from the use of older sires than dams. Generation interval ranged from 2.00 yr in line 7 to 5.83 yr in line 15, which shows substantial differences in parent age between lines for WW. Average parent ages calculated from post-weaning records of males and females were similar to those for WW. In general, generation turnover was faster for sires than for dams. Selection Differentials. Mean SD in standard units per generation for WW (table 2) ranged from in line 6 to 1.85 in line 2 for males when the data were unadjusted for inbreeding effects. Lesser pressure was applied in female selection, although SD were positive for all lines. Mid-parent SD were all positive except for line 6, and represent a range of saving from the lower 54% to the upper 36% under truncation selection. Selection pressure patterns for WW adjusted for inbreeding were similar to those for data unadjusted for inbreeding and serve as evidence that no direct attention was given to the level of inbreeding in selecting individual replacements. Selection differential of sires for postweaning traits of males (table 3) was positive for most lines for IW, FW, FC and ADG. Selection for FE was negative for several lines, with negative values representing desirable SD. Standardized SD per generation for inbred females showed little selection of females for postweaning traits. In fact, negative selection was practiced for most lines, especially for mature weights, and in these cases individuals selected to be parents were chosen from the bottom segment of the population. Overall Analysis Weaning Weigbt. From a total of 1,239 WW records for the inbred males and females, age of sire averaged 3.75 yr compared with 4.52 yr for age of dam. Generation intervals, determined as actual age of mid-parent, amounted to 4.13 yr. As would be expected, replacement rates were faster for sires than for dams. Mean pooled annual SD of sires and dams for WW (unadjusted for inbreeding) are shown in table 4. Annual SD showed a more consistent trend after The value for sires averaged 3.4 kg/yr or.50 standard deviations (o)/generation, corresponding to selecting the upper 69% of male population. Selection pressure for in- TABLE 2. SELECTION DIFFERENTIALS IN STANDARD UNITS PER GENERATION OF INBRED MALES AND FEMALES FOR ADJUSTED WEANING WEIGHT (UNADJUSTED FOR INBREEDING) BY LINE Line &S AD AP 2 Bon BA Colo Don Ft Lew LaPI Mon Pros Roy SJ Tarr RP
5 SELECTION INTENSITY IN HEREFORD CATTLE 931 m ~ ~ O ~ II I I II c/) I I 1 [ III I I I I I I Z z Z 0 r. oo 0 Z ~Z M I I I I ~ II 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 ~ ~'~ " " " I" I" " I" I" I" " " ~ ~ ~Z ~ z L~ ~ ~..... II M g Z r~ I I I" " ' I" I" I" I" ~'~ r, Z 0 N..~ M,,4 [-. "G~ 4~
6 932 NWAKALOR ET AL. TABLE 4. MEAN POOLED ANNUAL SELECTION DIFFERENTIALS FOR ADJUSTED WEANING WEIGHT Item Inbred males and females Linecross (unadjusted for Fx a) females AS AD AP AD Mean/yr in actual units, kg 3.4 Mean/generation in actual units, kg 14.1 Mean/generation in standard units.50 Truncated value, % 69 SD b alnbreeding effects. bstandard deviation. bred females was 1.0 kg/yr, or about three and one-half times smaller than for sires. This corresponds to standardized SD per generation of.150, with those selected representing the top 92% of the inbred female population. Midparent annual SD amounted to 2.2 kg/generation and was equivalent to.330/generation and selection of the top 78% of the population. Selection differentials of linecross females averaged.6 kg/yr. Standardized SD per generation amounted to.10o, with the truncated selection value representing the upper 95% of the linecross female population. This indicates slightly less selection for linecross than inbred females for WW. Postweaning Traits. The mean annual SD of sires for postweaning traits of males are presented in table 5. Selection differentials were positive for IW, FW, FC and ADG, but negative for FE. Negative SD would be expected for FE because lower feed intake per unit of gain is advantageous. In inbred females, annual SD (table 6) were negative on the average for gains from weaning to 12 too, 12 to 18 mo and mature cow weights, but positive for 12W and 18W. With the exception of 12W and 18W, for which selection was for the top percentage of the population, the selected individuals for other traits represented the lower segment of the population. In linecross females (table 6), average annual SD were small but positive for all traits except 12W and 18W, which amounted to -.2 and zero, respectively. These values (except for 12W which represent selection of the lower segment) indicate that about the upper 98% of the linecross female population were retained for breeding. Selection Indexes in Retrospect. Indexes actually practiced represent the average weightings actually used in any particular year and line and were determined in retrospect for inbred sires, inbred dams and linecross dams. The index for inbred males included adjusted WW, TABLE 5. MEAN POOLED ANNUAL SELECTION DIFFERENTIALS (AS) OVER ALL LINES FOR POSTWEANING TRAITS OF INBRED MALES IW a FW FC FEU FEA ADG Item (kg) (kg) (kg) (units) (units) (units) Mean/yr in actual units Mean/generation in actual units Mean/generation in standard units Truncated value, % SD b alw = initial weight, FW = final weight, FC = feed consumed, FEU = unadjusted feed efficiency, FEA = adjusted feed efficiency, ADG = average daily gain. bstandard deviation. AS
7 SELECTION INTENSITY IN HEREFORD CATTLE 933 z 9., ~. v > 9 v v m d ~ ~t'n o 9 i t I ~'~ v.@ m II e ~ ~,~ ~
8 934 NWAKALOR ET AL. FE (adjusted) and postweaning ADG. Initial weight, FW and FC were not included in the index because these are accounted for, respectively, by WW, ADG and FE. Female indexes consisted of adjusted WW, 12W, 18W, SPW and FAW. Postweaning gains were not included because these are fully described by the various weights. The phenotypic correlations and SD used to calculate the indexes are shown in table 7. The standard partial regression coefficients for the indexes actually practiced are given in table 8. Sire indexes show that ADG received the greatest emphasis and had about one and onehalf times the weight given to WW. Although FE received attention in the expected direction, it did not contribute significantly to the indexes. In both the inbred and linecross dam indexes, WW had the greatest emphasis and was expected because selection of heifers for replacement was done at weaning time. Discussion The generation intervals obtained in this study are within the ranges reported by Armstrong (1964), Flower et al. (1964), Brinks et al. (1965), Koch et al. (1974) and Buchanan et al. (1982). As in the present study, they re- ported faster replacement rates for sires than for dams. The more consistent trend in annual SD observed for WW after 1955 probably reflected the change of the selection index that took place after that year. Also the culling of lines 6, 7 and 8 from the herd in 1955 for lower-thanaverage productivity probably resulted in better stabilization of performance in the herd. The effect of both events was demonstrated in a previous study (Nwakalor et al., 1976) where a strong upward genetic trend was reported for WW. Previous studies (Brinks et al., 1961, 1965; Armstrong, 1964; Flower et al., 1964) reported variable but positive selection intensity for WW. Other researchers (Chapman et al., 1972;Koch et al., 1974; Stanforth and Frahm, 1975; Buchanan et al., 1982) reported positive and relatively intense selection pressure for the same trait. In all cases, much greater pressure was applied in male than in female selection. However, in those studies WW was the only trait selected for; in the present study selection was for preweaning and postweaning growth performance. The SD of sires for postweaning traits of males do not represent very intense selection. However, considering that selection was not for single traits, the overall selection pressure for TABLE 7. PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS AND SELECTION DIFFERENTIALS (PER GENERATION IN STANDARD MEASURE) USED TO CALCULATE SELECTION INDEXES IN RETROSPECT Trait a WW FE ADG AS Weaning wt (WW) b Feed efficiency (FE) c Avg daily gain (ADG) Trait d WW 12W 18W SPW FAW Inbred AD Linecross Weaning wt (WW) b mo wt (12W) mo wt (18W) Mature spring wt (SPW) Mature fall wt (FAW) amales. badjusted for inbreeding effects. CAdjusted for differences in body weight. dfemales.
9 SELECTION INTENSITY IN HEREFORD CATTLE 935 TABLE 8. STANDARD PARTIAL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS FOR SIRE AND DAM SELECTION INDEXES a Index WW FE ADG AIs f Inbred sires 1 b c Index WW 12W 18W SPW FAW AIDg Inbred dams 1 d e Linecro~dams aabbreviations for traits are as defined in table 7. bwith weaning weight adjusted for inbreeding and feed efficiency adjusted to common body weight. CWith weaning weight unadjusted for inbreeding and feed efficiency adjusted to common body weight. dwith weaning weight adjusted for inbreeding. ewith weaning weight unadjusted for inbreeding. fstandardized sire index selection differential. gstandardized female index selection differential. postweaning traits in bulls may be considered reasonable. In females, the SD for postweaning traits indicate that selection was not intense on inbred and linecross dams. Selection differentials for mature weights might be biased since selection of females was done at weaning time. Armstrong (1964) reported greater selection pressure on the sires, amounting to.70,.90 and.78o/generation for IW, FW and ADG, and a positive selection pressure of -.33o/generation for FE for bulls. Brinks et al. (1965) revealed that selection of sires was fairly intense for postweaning traits, averaging 1.10 and 1.46o/generation for 196-d gain and FW. In conformity with the results of the present study, selection was not intense for any of the postweaning traits in females. Buchanan et al. (1982) in their study of Fort Robinson, Nebraska data reported much larger SD for males, representing 79 to 84% of actual mid-parent SD in the three lines studied, similar to the proportions of 79 to 88% reported in an earlier analysis of the same data through 1970 by Koch et al. (1974). A similar study by Stanforth and Frahm (1975) showed that male selection accounted for 80 and 83% of the primary SD for weaning and yearling weights. Nelms and Stratton (1967) reported average annual midparent standardized SD of.142o/generation for ADG and.190o/generation for FW. Other studies (Flower et al., 1964; Chapman et al., 1969, 1972; Bailey et al., 1971) showed that selection for postweaning traits was fairly intense in the males and much less in the females. In some cases, little or no selection was practiced in the females. The inclusion of sire SD of some foundation animals in the annual weighted average could have caused a downward bias in the SD. However, results from this study and those reported in the literature indicate that most of the midparent selection pressure for WW and postweaning traits was applied in male selection as was expected. The standard partial regression coefficients obtained in this study for WW (.446 and.395) and ADG (.613 and.622) are close to the values of.423 and.577 reported, respectively, for the two traits by Armstrong (1964) for the same herd. He also reported much more attention to ADG than to any other trait included in the index. Although Brinks et al. (1965) did not consider ADG directly in the sire index, they reported that FW received much more emphasis than weights or scores recorded
10 936 NWAKALOR ET AL. before FW. Koch et al. (1974) and Buchanan et al. (1982) noted greatest emphasis for WW in the sire index for WW line, for yearling weight in the sire index for yearling weight line, and for muscling score in the sire index of yearling weight and muscling score line. The sire SD per generation (AIs), in standard measure, of.818 and.792 were similar to the values of.86 and.89 obtained by Armstrong (1964) but were lower than those reported by Brinks et al. (1965), Koch et al. (1974) and Buchanan et al. (1982). There was much greater opportunity for selection in sires than in dams due to a smaller fraction needed for replacement. Sire index SD represented about 79% of the total SD. Literature Cited Anonymous Origin and history of cattle lines at the San Juan Basin Research Center, Hesperus, Colorado. Colorado State Univ. Exp. Sta. General Series 945. pp Armstrong, J. B Evaluation of selection intensity and genetic changes in experimental herd of Hereford cattle. Ph.D. Thesis. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins. Bailey, C. M., W. R. Harvey, J. E. Hunter and C. R. Torell Estimated direct and correlated response to selection for performance traits in closed Hereford lines under different types of environments. J. Anim. Sci. 33:541. Brinks, J. S., R. T. Clark and N. M. Kieffer Evaluation of response to selection and inbreeding in a closed line of Hereford cattle. USDA Tech. Bull Brinks, J. S., R. T. Clark, N. M. Kieffer and J. R. Quesenberry Mature weight in Hereford range cows: Heritability, repeatability and relationship to calf performance. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 501. Brinks, J. S., R. T. Clark, N. M. Kieffer and J. J. Urick Estimates of genetic, environmental and phenotypic parameters in range Hereford females. J. Anim. Sci. 23:711. Brinks, J. S., R. T. Clark and F. J. Rice Estimation of genetic trends in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 20:903 (Abstr.). Buchanan, D. S., M. K. Nielsen, R. M. Koch and L. V. Cundiff Selection for growth and muscling score in beef cattle. I. Selection applied. J. Anim. Sci. 55:516. Chapman, H. D., T. M. Clyburn and W. C. McCormick Selection of beef cattle for single traits. J. Anita. Sci. 29:225. Chapman, H. D., T. M. Clyburn and W. C. McCormick Comparison of criteria for selecting introduced beef sires. J. Anita. Sci. 35:321. Dickerson, G. E., C. T. Blunn, A. B. Chapman, R. M. Kottman, J. L. Krider, E. J. Warwick and J. A. Whatley, Jr Evaluation of selection in developing inbred lines of swine. North Central Regional Pub. 38, Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull p 60. Dickerson, G. E. and L. N. Hazel Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in livestock. J. Agr. Res. (Camb.) 69:459. Flower, A. E., J. S. Brinks, J. J. Urick and F. S. Willson Selection intensities and time trends for performance traits in range Hereford cattle under mass and recurrent selection. J. Anim. Sci. 23:189. Harvey, W. R. and G. D. Bearden Tables of expected genetic progress in each of two traits. USDA Agr. Res. Serv., ARS Harwin, G. O The effect of inbreeding and environmental factors on the weaning weight and post-weaning growth of range Hereford cattle. Ph.D. Thesis. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins. Koch, R. M., K. E. Gregory and L. V. Cundiff Selection in beef cattle. I. Selection applied and generation interval. J. Anim. Sci. 39:449. Nelms, G. E. and P. O. Stratton Selection practiced and phenotypic change in a closed line of beef cattle. J. Anita. Sci. 26:274. Nwakalor, L. N., J. S. Brinks and G. V. Richardson Estimated genetic change in weaning weight of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 396. Petty, R. R. and T. C. Cartwright A summary of genetic and environmental statistics for growth and conformation traits of young beef cattle. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Dept. Anim. Sci. Tech. Rep. 5. Preston, J. M. and M. B. Willis Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon Press, New York. Rendel, J. M. and Alan Robertson Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J. Genet. 50:1. Stanforth, T. A. and R. R. Frahm Selection for weaning and yearling weight in Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 41:259 (Abstr.).
AGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1. ABSTRACt"
AGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1 D. L. Lubritz 2, K. Forrest 2 and O. W. Robison 2 North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7621 ABSTRACt" Milk production in
More informationRELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~ R. S. Kersey DeNise 2, D. E. Ray 2, A. M. Lane 2, V. L. Rundle 3 and M. Torabi 2 University of Arizona Tucson 85721 ABSTRACT
More informationMike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14
2014 Beef Improvement Federation Meeting! The optimum beef cow is indeed an elusive beast. I have searched for her for more than 20 years, and have come up empty handed. But I believe I m getting close.!
More informationADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS OF ANGUS BULLS FOR DIFFERENCES IN MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1'2'3
ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS OF ANGUS BULLS FOR DIFFERENCES IN MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1'2'3 M. E. Davis 4, G. R. Wilson 4, W. R. Harvey a and T. B. Turner 4 The Ohio State University, Columbus
More informationEPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)
EPD Info gelbvieh.org/genetic-technology/epd-info/ Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Expected progeny differences (EPDs) can be used to predict the average
More informationGoal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction
Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction Mark Johnson Inheritance of Quantitative Traits P = G + E Phenotype = Genotype + Environment Genotype Additive due to individual genes Non-additive due to combinations
More informationUnderstanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)
Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA3068 Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Brett Barham Associate Professor Animal Science Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: http://www.uaex.edu
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING
CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING D. M. ~arshall', M. D. onf fore? and C. A. ~inke? Department of Animal
More informationImpact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center
Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center Importance of Feed Efficiency By 2050, the world population is expected to increase
More informationHETEROSIS RETENTION FOR LIVE WEIGHT IN ADVANCED GENERATIONS OF A HEREFORD AND ANGUS CROSSBREEDING EXPERIMENT
HETEROSIS RETENTION FOR LIVE WEIGHT IN ADVANCED GENERATIONS OF A HEREFORD AND ANGUS CROSSBREEDING EXPERIMENT C.A. MORRIS, R.L. BAKER, W.D. HOHENBOKEN, D.L. JOHNSON, N.G. CULLEN Ruakura Animal Research
More information11/30/2018. Introduction to Genomic Selection OUTLINE. 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2.
Introduction to Genomic Selection imagefriend.com OUTLINE 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2. Selection tools - Selection Indexes - Genotyping resources 3. DNA-based markers
More informationBeef Bulls. Performance of Progeny. High and Low Per forming. Sired by JAN U N IV ERSI T Y STATION EXPERIMENT AGRICULTU RAL A U BUR N
AUGUST 1971 Performance of Progeny Sired by JAN2 71 97 2 High and Low Per forming Beef Bulls AGRICULTU RAL A U BUR N E. V. Smith, Director EXPERIMENT STATION U N IV ERSI T Y Auburn, Alaoor CONTENTS Page
More informationCOW HERD REPLACEMENT. John Dhuyvetter NCREC NDSU Extension
COW HERD REPLACEMENT John Dhuyvetter NCREC NDSU Extension Cow Ownership Costs Cow Longevity Culling Reasons and Rates Depreciation-Replacement Cost Replacement Strategies Raising or Buying Replacements
More informationMILK PRODUCTION IN HEREFORD COWS
MILK PRODUCTION IN HEREFORD COWS I. MEANS AND CORRELATIONS 1.2 O.W. Robison, M.K.M. Yusuff 3 and E.U. Dillard North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607 SUMMARY Milk production in Hereford cows was
More informationBEEF BEEF AND DAIRY BEEF FEMALES MATED TO ANGUS AND CHAROLAIS SIRES. II. CALF GROWTH, WEANING RATE AND COW PRODUCTIVITY 1'2
BEEF BEEF AND DAIRY BEEF FEMALES MATED TO ANGUS AND CHAROLAIS SIRES. II. CALF GROWTH, WEANING RATE AND COW PRODUCTIVITY 1'2 L. A. Nelson, G. D. Beavers and T. S. Stewart Purdue University, West Lafayette,
More informationSelecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers
Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers 10 to 20% of a cowherd is replaced annually. Approximately 30% of weaned heifers are needed for replacement Additional heifers are needed for expansion Heifers
More informationMatching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment
Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment Don D. Hargrove Animal Science Department University of Florida The goal in planning a management program for a commercial cow-calf operation is to maximize
More informationWHETHER dealing with a commercial
Selecting, Producing, and Marketing Beef Cattle WHETHER dealing with a commercial cow-calf, purebred cow-calf, or feedlot operation, a beef producer needs to be capable of analyzing and selecting high-quality
More informationBeef Production. in a Crisscross Breeding System Involving Angus, Brahman, and Hereford
Beef Production in a Crisscross Breeding System Involving Angus, Brahman, and Hereford October 1973 Bulletin 759 (technical) Agricultural Experiment Stations Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
More information1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
Producer Prediction of Optimal Sire Characteristics Impacting Farm Profitibility In a Stochastic Bio-Economic Decision Framework William Herring, and Vern Pierce 1 Copyright 1999 by Vern Pierce. All rights
More informationRelationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues
Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues Dr. Matt Hersom 1 1 Assistant Professor, UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences, Gainesville, FL Introduction Proper nutritional status
More informationAlison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.
The Value of Accuracy Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and Genomics University of California, Davis alvaneenennaam@ucdavis.edu (530) 752-7942 animalscience.ucdavis.edu/animalbiotech
More informationBreeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G
Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G Introduction A well-defined breeding objective provides commercial producers a mechanism for extracting value from
More informationREPRODUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT
REPRODUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT D.S. Buchanan 1, R. Gosz 2, E. Nesamvuni 2 and L. Knori 3 Story in Brief Reproductive
More information1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires For Use in U.S. Beef Production Systems,2 M. D. MacNeil 3 USDA Agricultural Research Service Miles City, Montana 5930 USA ABSTRACT Breeding objectives facilitate
More informationCanadian Hereford Association
Canadian Hereford Association Pan American Hereford Cattle Evaluation Fall 2017 EPD Averages, Tools and Trends Includes: Introduction to Genomically Enhanced EPD Post-Weaning Gain EPD Residual Feed Intake
More informationCrossbreeding in Beef Cattle
W 471 Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle F. David Kirkpatrick, Professor Department of Animal Science Improving the productivity and efficiency of a commercial beef production operation through genetic methods
More informationUnderstanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech
publication 400-804 Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech Expected progeny differences (EPDs) provide estimates of the genetic value
More informationWeight and Grade of Calf at Weaning as a Criterion for Selection of the Female Beef Breeding Herd
Weight and Grade of Calf at Weaning as a Criterion for Selection of the Female Beef Breeding Herd L. G. W ILLIAMS* AND W. J. B. M URPHY Summary The weight and grade of a calf at weaning can be used to
More informationCulling the Commercial Cow Herd: BIF Fact Sheet
1 of 6 10/26/2009 1:52 PM University of Missouri Extension G2036, Reviewed October 1993 Culling the Commercial Cow Herd: BIF Fact Sheet John Massey Department of Animal Sciences Beef cow owners should
More informationREALISED RESPONSES TO DIVERGENT SELECTION FOR YEARLING GROWTH RATE IN ANGUS CATTLE
REALISED RESPONSES TO DIVERGENT SELECTION FOR YEARLING GROWTH RATE IN ANGUS CATTLE P.F. PARNELL1, R. BARLOW2, and B. TIER3, AUSTRALIA 1 Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW, 2 Agricultural Research
More informationCrossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer Alison Van Eenennaam, University of California, Davis
2017-2 Crossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer Alison Van Eenennaam, University of California, Davis alvaneenennaam@ucdavis.edu Dr. Darrh Bullock Dr. Jared Decker Dr. Megan Rolf Dr. Matthew Spangler
More informationReal-Life Implementation of Controlled Breeding Season
Real-Life Implementation of Controlled Breeding Season T. R. Troxel, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Department Head, Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR Story in Brief Reducing the length
More informationReproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist
Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist Reproductive efficiency has long been recognized as the most important aspect of commercial beef production. If only
More informationEvaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture
Evaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture S. McCabe 1,2, N. McHugh 3, N. O Connell 2 and R. Prendiville 1 EAAP 67th Annual Meeting, Belfast, 29th
More informationBREED AND HETEROSIS EFFECTS OF AMERICAN ZEBU CATTLE 1,2
BREED AND HETEROSIS EFFECTS OF AMERICAN EBU CATTLE 1,2 Summary The Brahman (American ebu) has been evaluated in numerous crossbreeding studies throughout the Southern United States. Brahman females producing
More informationImproving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee
Section 4 23 by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee Introduction Carefully identifying better animals and breeding them with other superior animals will gradually improve the genetics of a herd. Enhanced genetics
More informationGenetic and Environmental Parameters for Mature Weight and Other Growth Measures in Polled Hereford Cattle'
Published December 11, 2014 Genetic and Environmental Parameters for Mature Weight and Other Growth Measures in Polled Hereford Cattle' K. D. Bullockz, J. K. Bertrand, and L. L. Benyshek Department of
More informationRelationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues
Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues Dr. Matt Hersom Extension Beef Cattle Specialist University of Florida - Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal
More informationFEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?
Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIV November 17, 18, and 19, 2015, Loveland, Colorado FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT? H. H. Trey Patterson Padlock Ranch
More informationStrategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle
Strategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle L. R. Schaeffer Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock Department of Animal & Poultry Science University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G
More informationGenomic-Polygenic and Polygenic Evaluation of Multibreed Angus-Brahman Cattle for Direct and Maternal Growth Traits Under Subtropical Conditions
Genomic-Polygenic and Polygenic Evaluation of Multibreed Angus-Brahman Cattle for Direct and Maternal Growth Traits Under Subtropical Conditions M. A. Elzo 1, M. G. Thomas 2, D. D. Johnson 1, C. A. Martinez
More informationComparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1
Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1 R. N. Funston 2 and G. H. Deutscher University of Nebraska,
More informationA Comparison of Milk Production In
the medium level or an additional 15 pounds of milk to produce an additional pound of weaning weight. Milk production levels of cows of both breeds were similar and low during August when forage intake
More informationMILK PROTEIN GENOTYPE EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION IN BEEF HEIFERS AND CALF PERFORMANCE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS. Story in Brief
MILK PROTEIN GENOTYPE EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION IN BEEF HEIFERS AND CALF PERFORMANCE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS Gary K. Ziehe1, Daniel Pomp2 and David S. Buchanan3 Story in Brief Genotypes at the j3-lactoglobulinand
More informationEFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS
EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS Oregon State University/Beef Industry Tour Corvallis, Oregon Thursday, October 25, 2018 Overview Introduction/importance of sire selection Selection
More informationMa# Spangler Sept. 8, 2016
Relative Economic Weights for Traditional Beef Firm Reproduction:Growth:End Product 10:5:1 Traditional genetic selection for fertility: indicator traits and potential antagonisms Matt Spangler University
More informationGENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska
GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE Matt Spangler University of Nebraska GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD Spangler s interpretation Qualifications Fertile at a young age Short post-partum
More informationBeef calf weights at 100 days and 205 days as indicators of dams' producing ability
Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1964 Beef calf weights at 100 days and 205 days as indicators of dams' producing ability Kenneth Joe Drewry Iowa State University Follow this and additional works
More informationFarm Management Decisions in the Era of Genomics
Farm Management Decisions in the Era of Genomics Brian Van Doormaal and Gerrit Kistemaker Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, Ontario. E-mail: Brian@cdn.ca Take Home Messages Genomics has had a major impact
More informationBREEDING YEARLING HEIFERS
BREEDING YEARLING HEIFERS Donald E. Ray, 1 Albert M. Lane, 2 Carl B. Roubicek, 3 and Richard W. Rice 4 Many studies have shown returns are increased by breeding yearling heifers to calve for the first
More informationUsing EPDs in a Commercial Herd
Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd R. R. Schalles and K. O. Zoellner Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University Manhattan, KS 66506 Today, beef cattle producers have the best tools
More informationA COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson
A COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson Artificial insemination has been promoted for a number of years as being one management tool available
More informationOverview. Initial Research. Overview. Initial Research. Initial Research. Adapting Angus Cattle to Subtropical Climates 10/28/2015
Adapting Angus Cattle to Subtropical Climates John Arthington University of / IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona Overview Typical commercial cow/calf herds are comprised of Brahman x
More informationPregnancy Rates. Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University. !I am not an economist and I do not. ! Biology and interactions
Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI Casper, Wyoming December 1-3, 2009! We have all heard the saying, Money isn t everything, and then we have also heard the reply,
More informationWhere can the greatest economic value of genomic testing be found?
Where can the greatest economic value of genomic testing be found? Albert De Vries Department of Animal Sciences University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 devries@ufl.edu Dairy Genomics Workshop, Twin
More information2018 ICBF and Sheep Ireland Genetics Conference 20 th Anniversary. Dorian Garrick
2018 ICBF and Sheep Ireland Genetics Conference 20 th Anniversary Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep Focus on The Future Dorian Garrick AL Rae Centre for Genetics & Breeding, New Zealand D.Garrick@massey.ac.nz
More informationSelection and Development of Heifers
Selection and Development of Heifers Bob Sand Animal Science Department University of Florida, Gainesville Introduction One of the most expensive phases of the production cycle is the development of replacement
More informationProceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI December 1, 2 and , Casper, WY. Integrating Information into Selection. Loren Berger.
Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI December 1, 2 and 3 2009, Casper, WY Integrating Information into Selection Loren Berger Introduction Berger s Herdmasters is located on the southern edge
More informationProceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10, 11, 2003, Mitchell Nebraska
Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10, 11, 2003, Mitchell Nebraska THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND POTENTIAL WHEN USING CURRENT AND FUTURE EPD ECONOMICALLY RELEVANT TRAITS R. Mark Enns
More informationRobert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant
Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant Heterosis Individual Maternal Paternal Complementarity Putting it together to increase profit Maternal replacements Bull replacements Offer marketing opportunities
More informationPerformance Testing Bulls on the Farm
Agriculture and Natural Resources Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm FSA3027 Brett Barham Associate Professor Animal Science Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: http://www.uaex.edu Importance
More informationProceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska BEEF PRODUCTION WITHOUT MATURE COWS
Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska BEEF PRODUCTION WITHOUT MATURE COWS George E. Seidel, Jr. Colorado State University Summary Mature beef cows must
More informationWe are in the bull business
Can Selection Indexes Improve Profitability? What Time Has Taught Us about Selecting for Profit Lee Leachman Leachman Cattle of Colorado December 14 th, 2013 We are in the bull business We select Angus,
More informationHERD REPLACEMENTS: HEIFERS OR OPEN COWS?
HERD REPLACEMENTS: HEIFERS OR OPEN COWS? J. F. Baker Coastal Plain Experiment Station University of Georgia INTRODUCTION It is common to find opinions, rules of thumb or suggestions for livestock operations
More informationCrossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle
Extension Bulletin E-270 New June 1999 Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle Harlan Ritchie, B. Dennis Banks, Daniel Buskirk, Joel Cowley and David Hawkins Department of Animal Science Reasons for Crossbreeding
More informationEffective Use Of EPDs. Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist
Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist February 10-11, 2016 2 Background EPDs have been available for more than 30 years. The use of
More informationBeef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast
Beef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast J. W. Turner Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University The importance of the brood cow to efficient beef production is often overlooked
More informationUSING GENOMICS TO AFFECT COW HERD REPRODUCTION. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska-Lincoln
USING GENOMICS TO AFFECT COW HERD REPRODUCTION Matt Spangler University of Nebraska-Lincoln Relative Economic Weights for Traditional Beef Firm Reproduction:Growth:End Product 10:5:1 (Melton, 1995) Improvement
More informationIMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION
IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION Timothy D. Hewitt and John Holt North Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida, Marianna; and Food and Resource
More informationCHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP
CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP J. N. Wiltbank Animal Science Department Brigham Young University Several authors have stated that reproductive performance is the most important economic trait in a
More informationProceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado
Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado BENEFITS OF WEANING CALVES AT YOUNGER THAN TRADITIONAL AGES Trey Patterson Padlock Ranch Company, Ranchester,
More informationEFFECTS OF EARLY-WEANING AND BODY CONDITION SCORE (BCS) AT CALVING ON PERFORMANCE OF SPRING CALVING COWS
EFFECTS OF EARLY-WEANING AND BODY CONDITION SCORE (BCS) AT CALVING ON PERFORMANCE OF SPRING CALVING COWS H.T. Purvis II 1, C. R. Floyd 1, K. S. Lusby 2 and R.P. Wettemann 3 Story in Brief Ninety-three
More informationBreeding your cows for genetic gain. Max Tweedie, B+LNZ Genetics
Breeding your cows for genetic gain Max Tweedie, B+LNZ Genetics Genetic improvement Genetic improvement should be the key objective for a stud breeder. Occurs when the sire team you select are of higher
More informationMatching Calving Date With Forage Nutrients: Production and Economic Impacts
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Range Beef Cow Symposium Animal Science Department December 1997 Matching Calving Date With Forage Nutrients: Production
More informationUse of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers
Animal Industry Report AS 650 ASL R1869 2004 Use of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers Abebe T. Hassen Iowa State University Doyle E. Wilson
More informationBeef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016
Virginia Cooperative Extension Animal & Poultry Sciences 366 Litton Reaves (0306) Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 540/231-9159 Fax: 540/231-3010 E-mail: sgreiner@vt.edu www.apsc.vt.edu Livestock Update Beef
More informationComparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake
Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake J. W. Adcock, D. B. Faulkner, D. W. Shike and K. M. Retallick Background With rising inputs, increased pressure has been put on cow-calf
More informationGot Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015
Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk July 13 th, 2015 Every complex problem has a simple solution, and it s usually wrong. Author unknown The Optimum Beef Cow The never-ending cow size argument
More informationBreed Utilization and Production Efficiency
Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency Merlyn Nielsen 1 1 University of Nebraska-Lincoln Introduction Maximizing production efficiency, or perhaps more specifically economic efficiency, is a goal
More informationPlacing: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th
2012 North Dakota FFA Convention Pedigree Evaluation [50 points] Given the following scenario, place the attached four (4) pedigrees in the order best suited to meet the long term goals of the purebred
More informationThe economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E.
The economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E. Goddard 3 1 Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and
More information(Key Words: Female Replacement Rate, Profitability, Beef Cattle.) Introduction
CASE STUDY: The Professional Determining Replacement Animal Scientist Rates 20 in Beef (2004):87 93 Cattle Operations 87 C ASE STUDY: To Replace or Not to Replace: Determining Optimal Replacement Rates
More informationEffects of Early and Late Fall Calving of Beef Cows on Gestation Length and Pregnancy Rate
Effects of Early and Late Fall Calving of Beef Cows on Gestation Length and Pregnancy Rate D.W. Kastner, F.J. White, I. Rubio, R.P. Wettemann, and D.L. Lalman Story in Brief Effects of early and late fall
More informationUsing Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd
Using Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd Pedigree-Based Selection Dr. Kent A. Weigel Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin Madison 1675 Observatory Drive
More information29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale
One Bar Eleven Ranch John E. Rouse Beef Improvement Center 29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale Monday April 13 th, 12:30 p.m. Selling Approximately 50 Yearling Bulls One Bar Eleven Ranch John E. Rouse Beef Improvement
More informationTHE USE OF CROSSBRED COWS TO INCREASE BEEF PRODUCTION PER HECTARE
THE USE OF CROSSBRED COWS TO INCREASE BEEF PRODUCTION PER HECTARE J.H.L. MORGAN, AUSTRALIA Postoral Research Institute P.O. Box 180, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia SUMMARY Most beef producers in Victoria
More informationTraits and Tools for Retention and Replacement of Females
Traits and Tools for Retention and Replacement of Females Megan Rolf State Beef Extension Specialist Overview Traits for replacement female selection Breeding Objectives Optimization of performance Fit
More informationTraditional genetic selection for fertility: Indicator traits and potential antagonisms
2016 Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Des Moines, Iowa September 7-8, 2016 229 Traditional genetic selection for fertility: Indicator traits and potential antagonisms Matt Spangler, University
More informationBreeding for Profit from Beef Production ( )
IRISH CATTLE BREEDING FEDERATION Breeding for Profit from Beef Production ( ) Animal Evaluation Unit 1 Overview Overview of Irish beef industry ICBF, ICBF database & Animal Events What are genetic evaluations?
More informationMCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report
MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report Daniel D. Buskirk*, Kevin S. Gould, and Daniel L. Grooms *Department of Animal Science Michigan State University Extension Department
More informationHeifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1
Heifer Management by Brian Freking 2000 Beef Progress Report-1 Heifer Management Topics Introduction Heifer Selection Heifer Nutrition Early Puberty Target Weight Concept Proper Feeding Breeding of Heifers
More informationUNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM
UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM GeneMax Focus is a genomic test created through collaboration between Angus Genetics Inc. (AGI), Certified Angus Beef (CAB) and Zoetis to help inform commercial Angus
More informationFocus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
FARM Assistance Focus Profitability of Beef Cattle Best Management Practices in South Texas: Improving Profitability with Genetically Superior Sires and Higher Breeding Ratios Mac Young Joe Paschal Levi
More informationFocus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
FARM Assistance Focus Profitability of Beef Cattle Best Management Practices in South Texas: Improving Profitability with Genetically Superior Sires and Higher Breeding Ratios Mac Young Joe Paschal Levi
More informationUNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER)
UNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER) 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION (HIGH CONCENTRATE) Production of young bulls from the suckler herd which are slaughtered before they reach 16 months of age. These young bulls are
More informationof Nebraska - Lincoln
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science Animal Science Department February 2004 Genetic response to selection
More informationThe cow-less cow herd
2016 Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Des Moines, Iowa September 7-8, 2016 260 The cow-less cow herd George E. Seidel, Jr., Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State
More informationUniversity o/ Nebraska, Lincoln 68503
THE ROLE OF MATERNAL EFFECTS IN ANIMAL BREEDING: VI. MATERNAL EFFECTS IN BEEF CATTLE 1, 2 ROBERT IV[. KOCH University o/ Nebraska, Lincoln 6853 ATERNAL effects as used in this discus- M sion refer to differences
More information