AFPC AGRICULTURAL & FOOD POLICY CENTER TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
|
|
- Pearl Blake
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TEXAS AGRICULTURE BY CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: AFPC Working Paper September 1997 AFPC AGRICULTURAL & FOOD POLICY CENTER TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Department of Agricultural Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas Agricultural Extension Service Texas A&M University Web Site:
2 A policy working paper is designed to provide economic research on a timely basis. It is an interim product of a larger AFPC research project which will eventually be published as a policy research report. These results are published at this time because they are believed to contain relevant information to the resolution of current policy issues. AFPC welcomes comments and discussions of these results and their implications. Address such comments to the author(s) at: or call Agricultural and Food Policy Center Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University College Station, Texas
3 TEXAS AGRICULTURE BY CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: AFPC Working Paper Ronald D. Knutson Edward G. Smith Carl G. Anderson Katherine R. Cook Natalie A. Outlaw Dawne M. Hicks Agricultural and Food Policy Center Department of Agricultural Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas Agricultural Extension Service Texas A&M University September 1997 College Station, Texas Telephone: (409) Web Site:
4 TEXAS AGRICULTURE BY CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Ronald D. Knutson, Edward G. Smith, Carl G. Anderson, Katherine R. Cook, Natalie A. Outlaw, and Dawne M. Hicks Agriculture, as used in this paper, includes the production of all program crops, fruits, vegetables, nuts, nursery products, livestock, dairy, and poultry produced with the intention of earning a profit. When all economic activities related to the food and fiber sector are included, agriculture ranks as the second largest industry in Texas. 1 The purpose of this AFPC Working Paper is to present estimates of the farm level value of agricultural production by congressional district. The value of agricultural production for each Texas county is estimated annually by the County Agricultural Extension Agent with the support of local Extension Program Councils (Table 1). Therefore, these are not official National Agricultural Statistics Service/USDA data. They are, however, the only estimates available on the current value of production by Texas counties. Some congressional districts include only part of a county. For example, Brazos County is divided between District 5 and District 8. No attempt was made to divide the value of agriculture production in Brazos County between the two districts. Instead, the full value of agricultural production in Brazos County was included for both District 5 and District 8. Obviously, this procedure introduced some double counting and over-estimation of the value of production in districts where the whole county is not contained within the district. When 1 The largest industry is energy. 1
5 summed over the entire state, the magnitude of such double counting was 39 percent for crops, 15 percent for livestock, 29 percent for ag-related commodities, 26 percent for the total value of production, and 14 percent for the program commodities (Table 2). The higher differential for crops reflects the importance of nursery commodities in urban counties which are often included in more than one district. The lower proportion of livestock reflects the obvious absence of feedlots in urban counties. Every congressional district has at least one shared county, with District 4 having eight. Importance of Data From a policy perspective, this data provides an indication of the importance of production agriculture and farm programs to farmer and rancher constituents by congressional district. This point is emphasized by separating out the value of commodities covered by farm programs. Commodities covered only by marketing orders (such as certain vegetables) are not included as program commodities because they do not receive any direct subsidies or payments, and the order provisions are not normally affected by major legislation such as the 1996 Farm Bill. While program commodities are separated out, it is important to note that other crops, livestock, and/or poultry that are not the direct recipient of subsidies or payments are also affected by farm programs. For example, beef, hog, and poultry producers are indirectly impacted by grain policies that effect both the price and the stability of the market place. It also needs to be emphasized that the ultimate beneficiary of most farm programs is the consumer. Just as the livestock and poultry producers are impacted by current grain policy, U.S. consumers enjoy a plentiful supply of food and fiber purchased at relatively reasonable prices. At least equally important, the security of the U.S. food supply has seldom been in doubt, 2
6 despite adverse weather at home and abroad. This reality is a consequence of farmers who industriously employ the technology continuously infused into agriculture and of government programs that undergird U.S. agriculture. It is recognized that the production value data presented understate the importance of agriculture to each district. Many industries and services are related directly to agricultural production. For example, Texas farmers are buyers of agricultural chemicals, many of which are produced within Texas. Such production input sales to farmers are not included in this data. Likewise, farm sales create employment in marketing, processing, exporting, and retailing. Estimating the magnitude of such economic activity on a county or district basis would be much more difficult and subject to considerable error. Results The results are presented in eight state summary and 30 individual district tables one for each congressional district. Table 1 indicates that the average total value of agricultural production over the period was nearly $14 billion, of which 42 percent was due to crops, 49 percent to livestock (including poultry), and 9 percent to other ag-related commodities. Program commodities accounted for 32 percent of the value of agricultural production in Texas over the period. The nature of support for these program commodities changed substantially as a result of the 1996 Farm Bill for most crops and dairy. Earlier, the incentive program for wool and mohair was eliminated and the honey program was converted to a recourse loan. 3
7 Table 2 indicates average value of crop and livestock production for all counties included in each congressional district over the period The last column indicates the value of program commodities as defined in Table 1. As indicated previously, the bottom two lines of Table 2 indicate the magnitude of double counting resulting from counties being included in more than a single district. Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 include the same information as in Table 2 except that the districts are ordered with respect to the value of crop production (Table 3), livestock production (Table 4), ag-related production (Table 5), total agricultural production (Table 6), and farm program commodities (Table 7). Table 3 indicates that for the period , the top five congressional districts, ranked in terms of the value of crop production, were Districts 19, 13, 14, 15, and 4. Nine districts included counties generating over $300 million in average crop sales over the period All but five of the 30 districts exceeded $100 million in crop sales. Table 4 indicates that for , the top five congressional districts, ranked in terms of the value of livestock production, were Districts 19, 13, 1, 17, and 14. Eight districts included counties generating over $300 million in livestock sales while 15 exceeded $100 million in sales. Table 5 indicates that for , the top five congressional districts, ranked in order of the value of ag-related production, include Districts 2, 1, 14, 4, and 23. For Districts 1 and 2, the biggest factor in ag-related production is the value of farm-related forestry. Fishing and hunting leases are also important contributors to ag-related production. Table 6 indicates that for , the top five congressional districts, ranked in order of the total value of agricultural production, include Districts 19, 13, 14, 1, and 2. Each of these 4
8 five districts and District 17 exceeded $1 billion in the average annual value of agricultural production over the period Districts 19 and 13 each generated over $2 billion worth of agricultural production. Only four districts included counties producing less than $100 million in production. Half of the districts had in excess of $400 million in total agricultural production. Table 7 indicates that the top five congressional districts, ranked in order of the value of farm program commodities over the period , were Districts 13, 19, 17, 14, and 1. Each of these districts, plus District 15, included counties producing farm program commodities valued in excess of $200 million. Twelve districts produced over $100 million in program commodities. In all but seven districts, the value of farm program commodities exceeded $20 million. Table 8 indicates the percentage of Texas production for each category of sales by congressional district. For example, the counties in District 1 account for 4 percent of crop production, 13 percent of Texas livestock production, 13 percent of ag-related production, 9 percent of total production, and 6 percent of program crops. Tables 9 through 38 provide information on sales by individual congressional district. On the page opposite each district table is a map indicating the counties included in the district. These should not be interpreted as district maps since if part of a county is in a district, the whole county is included on the map. Therefore, split counties are on more than one map. Implications Every Texan, as a consumer of food and fiber, is affected by agricultural policy issues. Rural issues are particularly important to those districts where agriculture represents a significant 5
9 share of economic activity. The data indicate that agriculture is more important to many congressional districts than might previously have been recognized. They indicate that in all but four congressional districts, production agriculture accounts for over $100 million in production. The 1996 Farm Bill substantially changed the nature of farm programs, although the average level of spending did not change materially from the past. With greater flexibility in production, cropping patterns are changing. In 18 of the 30 Texas congressional districts, farm program commodities represent over $50 million in production. 6
10 TABLE 1: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, AVERAGE COMMODITY STATE VALUE ($1,000) PERCENT OF STATE VALUE CROPS $5,760, % LIVESTOCK, DAIRY & POULTRY $6,789, % AG RELATED* $1,308, % TOTAL $13,858, % PROGRAM COMMODITY STATE VALUE ($1,000) PERCENT OF STATE VALUE RICE $159, % WHEAT $341, % BARLEY $1, % CORN $576, % OATS $14, % SORGHUM $425, % COTTON $1,540, % COTTONSEED $259, % PEANUTS $167, % SOYBEANS $38, % SUNFLOWERS $4, % SUGAR CANE $33, % SUGARBEETS $25, % MILK $788, % HONEY $3, % MOHAIR** $20, % WOOL** $13, % TOTAL $4,414, % * AG RELATED items include aquaculture, freshwater fishing, horses (work & recreation), hunting leases, outdoor ag related recreation, christmas trees, timber, and exotic animals. **Program phased out November 1, 1993, by PL Source: County data estimated by Texas Agricultural County Extension Agents.
11 TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION BY TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE ($1,000) District Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, & Ag Related Total Program Commodities 1 $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, *Dist. Total $8,014, $7,812, $1,689, $17,517, $5,048, **St. Tot. $5,760, $6,789, $1,308, $13,858, $4,414, * Total of column includes double counting of those counties where the district includes only a portion of the county. ** Estimated value of Texas production excluding double counting. Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
12 TABLE 3: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN ORDER OF THE VALUE OF CROP PRODUCTION, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, & Ag Related Total Program Commodities 19 $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
13 TABLE 4: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN ORDER OF THE VALUE OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, & Ag Related Total Program Commodities 19 $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
14 TABLE 5: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN ORDER OF THE VALUE OF AG RELATED PRODUCTION, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, & Ag Related Total Program Commodities 2 $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
15 TABLE 6: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN ORDER OF THE VALUE OF TOTAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, and Ag Related Total Program Commodities 19 $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
16 TABLE 7: RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN ORDER OF THE VALUE OF FARM PROGRAM COMMODITIES, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, and Ag Related Total Program Commodities 13 $1,128, $1,176, $52, $2,357, $1,070, $1,143, $1,252, $22, $2,417, $1,048, $392, $675, $42, $1,111, $571, $554, $638, $108, $1,301, $383, $227, $862, $169, $1,260, $253, $422, $159, $22, $604, $238, $338, $329, $74, $742, $181, $220, $39, $16, $275, $176, $184, $391, $27, $603, $167, $402, $274, $76, $752, $137, $175, $218, $65, $458, $116, $213, $237, $28, $479, $108, $175, $118, $32, $326, $77, $329, $57, $28, $416, $75, $171, $503, $568, $1,244, $58, $347, $256, $70, $674, $54, $76, $95, $25, $197, $53, $54, $37, $1, $92, $53, $150, $73, $45, $269, $41, $143, $50, $17, $212, $39, $220, $158, $65, $444, $37, $165, $37, $66, $270, $32, $106, $23, $4, $135, $24, $46, $15, $5, $67, $10, $9, $35, $5, $50, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $135, $21, $10, $167, $6, $71, $3, $3, $78, $3, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
17 TABLE 8: PERCENTAGE VALUE OF TEXAS AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION BY CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE ($1,000) Dist Crops Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Ag Related Total Crops, Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, and Ag Related Total Program Commodities % 12.71% 12.98% 9.09% 5.74% % 7.42% 43.45% 8.98% 1.32% % 0.35% 0.33% 0.98% 0.55% % 4.04% 5.85% 5.43% 3.11% % 3.78% 5.37% 4.87% 1.24% % 1.74% 2.45% 2.35% 1.76% % 0.32% 0.83% 1.21% 0.15% % 2.33% 5.01% 3.21% 0.84% % 0.56% 5.09% 1.95% 0.74% % 0.53% 0.41% 0.36% 0.15% % 5.76% 2.13% 4.36% 3.80% % 1.41% 1.91% 1.42% 1.22% % 17.33% 4.03% 17.01% 24.24% % 9.41% 8.26% 9.39% 8.83% % 2.35% 1.69% 4.36% 5.40% % 0.55% 0.08% 0.67% 1.21% % 9.95% 3.27% 8.02% 12.94% % 0.32% 0.83% 1.21% 0.15% % 18.44% 1.68% 17.45% 23.75% % 0.23% 0.41% 0.49% 0.23% % 3.21% 5.01% 3.31% 2.63% % 0.85% 2.22% 3.01% 1.71% % 4.85% 5.72% 5.36% 4.11% % 0.75% 1.37% 1.53% 0.90% % 0.32% 0.83% 1.21% 0.15% % 1.08% 3.49% 1.94% 0.95% % 0.58% 1.24% 1.99% 4.01% % 3.50% 2.14% 3.46% 2.92% % 0.32% 0.83% 1.21% 0.15% % 0.06% 0.26% 1.31% 0.08% *District Total % % % % % * Total of column includes double counting of those counties where the district includes only a portion of the county. Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
18 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MAPS AND TABLES
19 Franklin Morris District One Lamar Delta Red River Bowie Hunt Hopkins Titus Camp Cass Wood Upshur Marion Gregg Harrison Rusk Panola Nacogdoches VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $227, % 3.95% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $862, % 12.71% AG RELATED $169, % 12.98% TOTAL $1,260, % 9.09%
20 TABLE 9: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry ($1,000) COW/CALF BEEF $258, % 8.85% FED BEEF $24, % 1.29% MILK COWS $36, % 49.59% GOATS $ % 0.37% HOGS $2, % 2.94% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 1.04% POULTRY $323, % 37.58% SHEEP $ % 0.23% TOTAL $645, % 10.82% Program Commodity ($1,000) RICE $1, % 0.73% WHEAT $7, % 2.13% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $3, % 0.53% OATS $ % 1.97% SORGHUM $5, % 1.20% COTTON $6, % 0.45% COTTONSEED $1, % 0.39% PEANUTS $1, % 1.18% SOYBEANS % 23.10% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.66% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $217, % 27.58% HONEY $ % 6.99% MOHAIR $ % 0.02% WOOL $ % 0.18% PROGRAM TOTAL $253, % 5.74% *Includes the split counties of Gregg, Hunt, and Nacogdoches, whose full value of production is $279, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
21 District Two Cherokee Houston Nacogdoches Angelina Shelby San Augustine Sabins Trinity Newton Walker Polk Tyler Jasper Grimes San Jacinto Montgomery Hardin Liberty Orange VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY ($1000) PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $171, % 2.98% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $503, % 7.42% AG RELATED $568, % 43.45% TOTAL $1,244, % 8.98%
22 TABLE 10: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry ($1,000) COW/CALF BEEF $149, % 5.13% FED BEEF $24, % 1.32% MILK COWS $3, % 4.44% GOATS $ % 0.88% HOGS $2, % 3.59% OTHER LIVESTOCK $28, % 77.51% POULTRY $255, % 29.66% SHEEP $ % 0.17% TOTAL $465, % 7.80% Program Commodity ($1,000) RICE $8, % 5.37% WHEAT $ % 0.01% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $2, % 0.41% OATS $ % 0.15% SORGHUM $1, % 0.45% COTTON $1, % 0.08% COTTONSEED $ % 0.07% PEANUTS $ % 0.33% SOYBEANS $4, % 12.08% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $37, % 4.78% HONEY $1, % 29.44% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.01% PROGRAM TOTAL $58, % 1.32% *Includes the split counties of Montgomery and Nacogdoches, whose full value of production is $303, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
23 District Three Collin Dallas VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 3RD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY ($1000) PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VAUE CROPS $106, % 1.86% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $23, % 0.35% AG RELATED $4, % 0.33% TOTAL $135, % 0.98%
24 TABLE 11: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 3RD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW/CALF BEEF $13, % 0.46% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $ % 0.14% GOATS $ % 0.14% HOGS $ % 0.55% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.26% POULTRY $7, % 0.88% SHEEP $ % 0.06% TOTAL $21, % 0.36% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $7, % 2.29% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $5, % 0.91% OATS $ % 1.38% SORGHUM $6, % 1.54% COTTON $1, % 0.12% COTTONSEED $ % 0.09% PEANUTS $ % 0.00% SOYBEANS $ % 0.60% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.29% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $2, % 0.29% HONEY $ % 0.26% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.02% PROGRAM TOTAL $24, % 0.55% *Includes the split counties of Dallas and Collin, whose full value of production is $135, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
25 District Four Cooke Grayson Fannin Denton Collin Hunt Dallas Rockwall Rains Kaufman Van Zandt Gregg Smith VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY ($1000) PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $402, % 6.98% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $274, % 4.04% AG RELATED $76, % 5.85% TOTAL $752, % 5.43%
26 TABLE 12: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW/CALF BEEF $187, % 6.41% FED BEEF $ % 0.04% MILK COWS $4, % 5.49% GOATS $ % 1.72% HOGS $2, % 3.63% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 1.92% POULTRY $28, % 3.30% SHEEP $ % 0.77% TOTAL $225, % 3.78% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $35, % 10.39% BARLEY $ % 4.22% CORN $11, % 1.93% OATS $2, % 14.21% SORGHUM $23, % 5.56% COTTON $6, % 0.44% COTTONSEED $1, % 0.39% PEANUTS $3, % 2.39% SOYBEANS % 10.76% SUNFLOWERS $ % 1.58% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $48, % 6.15% HONEY $ % 6.80% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.27% PROGRAM TOTAL $137, % 3.11% *Includes the split counties of Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Denton, Gregg, Hunt, Kaufman, and Smith, whose full value of production is $509, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
27 District Five Dallas Kaufman Smith Henderson Limestone Freestone Anderson Leon Robertson Madison Brazos VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $347, % 6.04% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $256, % 3.78% AG RELATED $70, % 5.37% TOTAL $674, % 4.87%
28 TABLE 13: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW/CALF BEEF $226, % 7.76% FED BEEF $1, % 0.10% MILK COWS $1, % 2.33% GOATS $ % 0.97% HOGS $6, % 8.18% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.27% POULTRY $10, % 1.20% SHEEP $ % 0.21% TOTAL $247, % 4.16% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $3, % 1.02% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $5, % 0.92% OATS $ % 2.51% SORGHUM $2, % 0.63% COTTON $28, % 1.87% COTTONSEED $4, % 1.84% PEANUTS $ % 0.03% SOYBEANS $ % 0.50% SUNFLOWERS $ % 1.58% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $8, % 1.10% HONEY $ % 3.91% MOHAIR $ % 0.03% WOOL $ % 0.04% PROGRAM TOTAL $54, % 1.24% *Includes the split counties of Brazos, Dallas, Kaufman, and Smith, whose full value of production is $293, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
29 District Six Parker Tarrant Dallas Johnson Ellis VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $175, % 3.05% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $118, % 1.74% AG RELATED $32, % 2.45% TOTAL $326, % 2.35%
30 TABLE 14: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW/CALF BEEF $61, % 2.09% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $5, % 7.11% GOATS $ % 0.92% HOGS $1, % 1.71% OTHER LIVESTOCK $1, % 3.40% POULTRY $ % 0.02% SHEEP $ % 0.27% TOTAL $69, % 1.17% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $8, % 2.51% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $5, % 0.98% OATS $ % 2.41% SORGHUM $4, % 1.00% COTTON $6, % 0.44% COTTONSEED $1, % 0.68% PEANUTS $1, % 0.75% SOYBEANS $ % 0.32% SUNFLOWERS $ % 6.42% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $48, % 6.12% HONEY $ % 8.27% MOHAIR $ % 0.11% WOOL $ % 0.11% PROGRAM TOTAL $77, % 1.76% *Includes the split counties of Dallas, Ellis, Johnson, Parker, and Tarrant, whose full value of production is $326, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
31 District Seven Harris VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 7TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $135, % 2.35% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $21, % 0.32% AG RELATED $10, % 0.83% TOTAL $167, % 1.21%
32 TABLE 15: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 7TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW/CALF BEEF $19, % 0.66% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $ % 0.04% GOATS $1, % 2.51% HOGS $ % 0.28% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.00% POULTRY $ % 0.01% SHEEP $ % 0.04% TOTAL $20, % 0.35% Program Commodity RICE $3, % 1.90% WHEAT $ % 0.00% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $1, % 0.23% OATS $ % 0.02% SORGHUM $ % 0.04% COTTON $ % 0.01% COTTONSEED $ % 0.00% PEANUTS $ % 0.29% SOYBEANS $ % 1.27% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $1, % 0.14% HONEY $ % 1.60% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.00% PROGRAM TOTAL $6, % 0.15% *Includes the split county of Harris County whose full value of production is $167,872. Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
33 District Eight Brazos Montgomery Washington Austin Waller Harris VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 8TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $220, % 3.83% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $158, % 2.33% AG RELATED $65, % 5.01% TOTAL $444, % 3.21%
34 TABLE 16: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 8TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $102, % 3.52% FED BEEF $3, % 0.20% MILK COWS $ % 0.97% GOATS $1, % 2.74% HOGS $3, % 4.51% OTHER LIVESTOCK $29, % 79.67% POULTRY $11, % 1.35% SHEEP $ % 0.18% TOTAL $153, % 2.57% Program Commodity RICE $7, % 4.83% WHEAT $ % 0.02% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $9, % 1.69% OATS $ % 0.59% SORGHUM $1, % 0.45% COTTON $8, % 0.53% COTTONSEED $1, % 0.51% PEANUTS $2, % 1.43% SOYBEANS $ % 2.02% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $4, % 0.63% HONEY $ % 2.04% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.01% PROGRAM TOTAL $37, % 0.84% *Includes the split counties of Austin, Brazos, Harris, Montgomery, and Waller, whose full value of B production is $411, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
35 District Nine Harris Chambers Jefferson Galveston VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 9TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $165, % 2.88% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $37, % 0.56% AG RELATED $66, % 5.09% TOTAL $270, % 1.95%
36 TABLE 17: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 9TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $34, % 1.19% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $ % 0.04% GOATS $1, % 2.52% HOGS $ % 0.51% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.00% POULTRY $ % 0.01% SHEEP $ % 0.04% TOTAL $36, % 0.61% Program Commodity RICE $27, % 17.01% WHEAT $ % 0.00% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $1, % 0.24% OATS $ % 0.02% SORGHUM $ % 0.18% COTTON $ % 0.01% COTTONSEED $ % 0.00% PEANUTS $ % 0.29% SOYBEANS $1, % 3.10% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $1, % 0.14% HONEY $ % 11.91% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.00% PROGRAM TOTAL $32, % 0.74% *Includes the split county of Harris, whose full value of production is $167, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
37 District Ten Travis VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 10TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $9, % 0.16% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $35, % 0.53% AG RELATED $5, % 0.41% TOTAL $50, % 0.36%
38 TABLE 18: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 10TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $34, % 1.19% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $ % 0.13% GOATS $ % 0.37% HOGS $ % 0.23% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.00% POULTRY $ % 0.00% SHEEP $ % 0.02% TOTAL $35, % 0.59% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $ % 0.17% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $1, % 0.22% OATS $ % 0.13% SORGHUM $2, % 0.68% COTTON $1, % 0.10% COTTONSEED $ % 0.05% PEANUTS $ % 0.00% SOYBEANS $ % 0.00% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $ % 0.05% HONEY $ % 0.54% MOHAIR $ % 0.03% WOOL $ % 0.02% PROGRAM TOTAL $6, % 0.15% *Includes the split county of Travis, whose full value of production is $50, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
39 District Eleven Bosque Hill Hamilton Mills McLennan Coryell McCulloch San Saba Lampasas Falls Bell Milam VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 11TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $184, % 3.21% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $391, % 5.76% AG RELATED $27, % 2.13% TOTAL $603, % 4.36%
40 TABLE 19: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 11TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $200, % 6.88% FED BEEF $8, % 0.45% MILK COWS $2, % 3.96% GOATS $4, % 10.52% HOGS $5, % 6.24% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 1.18% POULTRY $116, % 13.57% SHEEP $5, % 7.21% TOTAL $344, % 5.77% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $25, % 7.55% BARLEY $ % 9.78% CORN $36, % 6.34% OATS $5, % 34.22% SORGHUM $23, % 5.49% COTTON $19, % 1.26% COTTONSEED $3, % 1.23% PEANUTS $3, % 1.92% SOYBEANS $3, % 9.82% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $43, % 5.50% HONEY $ % 5.58% MOHAIR $2, % 12.99% WOOL $ % 6.26% PROGRAM TOTAL $167, % 3.80% *Includes the split county of McCulloch, whose full value of production is $19, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
41 District Twelve Parker Tarrant Johnson VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 12th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $76, % 1.32% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $95, % 1.41% AG RELATED $25, % 1.91% TOTAL $197, % 1.42%
42 TABLE 20: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 12TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $43, % 1.50% FED BEEF $ % 0.00% MILK COWS $5, % 6.97% GOATS $ % 0.79% HOGS $ % 1.08% OTHER LIVESTOCK $1, % 3.40% POULTRY $ % 0.02% SHEEP $ % 0.19% TOTAL $51, % 0.87% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $5, % 1.54% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $ % 0.09% OATS $ % 1.61% SORGHUM $1, % 0.47% COTTON $ % 0.02% COTTONSEED $ % 0.02% PEANUTS $1, % 0.75% SOYBEANS $ % 0.03% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $43, % 5.58% HONEY $ % 0.97% MOHAIR $ % 0.11% WOOL $ % 0.06% PROGRAM TOTAL $53, % 1.22% *Includes the split counties of Johnson, Parker, and Tarrant, whose full value of production is $197, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
43 District Thirteen Lipscomb Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill Potter Carson Gray Wheeler Armstrong Donely Collingsworth Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Hardeman Foard Wilbarger Witchita Lubbock Crosby Dickens King Knox Baylor Archer Clay Montague Cooke Lynn Garza Denton VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 13th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $1,128, % 19.59% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $1,176, % 17.33% AG RELATED $52, % 4.03% TOTAL $2,357, % 17.01%
44 TABLE 21: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 13TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $391, % 13.41% FED BEEF $666, % 35.51% MILK COWS $2, % 3.45% GOATS $2, % 5.83% HOGS $9, % 12.16% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.41% POULTRY $38, % 4.53% SHEEP $7, % 10.69% TOTAL $1,120, % 18.78% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $111, % 32.53% BARLEY $ % 21.58% CORN $142, % 24.65% OATS $2, % 13.94% SORGHUM $66, % 15.74% COTTON $557, % 36.19% COTTONSEED $94, % 36.35% PEANUTS $20, % 12.20% SOYBEANS $6, % 17.51% SUNFLOWERS $2, % 64.86% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $9, % 36.97% MILK $56, % 7.11% HONEY $ % 3.03% MOHAIR $ % 0.01% WOOL $ % 1.70% PROGRAM TOTAL $1,070, % 24.24% *Includes the split counties of Cooke, Denton, and Lubbock, whose full value of production is $311, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
45 District Fourteen Williamson Burleson Blanco Travis Lee Hays Bastrop Caldwell Fayette Austin Waller Colorado Gonzales Lavaca Wharton Brazoria Victoria Jackson Matagorda Calhoun Refugio Aransas VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 14Th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $554, % 9.63% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $638, % 9.41% AG RELATED $108, % 8.26% TOTAL $1,301, % 9.39%
46 TABLE 22: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 14TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $393, % 13.46% FED BEEF $18, % 0.96% MILK COWS $ % 1.07% GOATS $1, % 2.83% HOGS $7, % 8.69% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.86% POULTRY $207, % 24.09% SHEEP $ % 0.82% TOTAL $628, % 10.54% Program Commodity RICE $113, % 71.32% WHEAT $2, % 0.85% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $67, % 11.77% OATS $1, % 9.42% SORGHUM $58, % 13.66% COTTON $101, % 6.57% COTTONSEED $14, % 5.50% PEANUTS $5, % 3.02% SOYBEANS $8, % 22.33% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.06% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $9, % 1.21% HONEY $ % 10.23% MOHAIR $ % 1.28% WOOL $ % 0.76% PROGRAM TOTAL $383, % 8.68% *Includes the split counties of Austin, Brazoria, Travis, Waller, and Williamson, whose full value of production is $271, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
47 District Fifteen Karnes DeWitt Goliad Bee Live Oak San Patricio Jim Wells Kleberg Brooks Hidalgo Willacy VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 15Th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $422, % 7.33% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $159, % 2.35% AG RELATED $22, % 1.69% TOTAL $604, % 4.36%
48 TABLE 23: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 15TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $126, % 4.32% FED BEEF $20, % 1.07% MILK COWS $ % 0.52% GOATS $ % 0.99% HOGS $2, % 2.71% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 1.48% POULTRY $ % 0.07% SHEEP $ % 0.09% TOTAL $150, % 2.53% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $1, % 0.50% BARLEY $ % 0.00% CORN $20, % 3.53% OATS $ % 0.65% SORGHUM $76, % 17.95% COTTON $93, % 6.06% COTTONSEED $13, % 5.29% PEANUTS $1, % 1.18% SOYBEANS $ % 0.24% SUNFLOWERS $ % 7.42% SUGAR CANE $21, % 63.07% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $9, % 1.16% HONEY $ % 1.71% MOHAIR $ % 0.01% WOOL $ % 0.05% PROGRAM TOTAL $238, % 5.40% *Includes the split counties of Jim Wells, Kleberg, and Williacy, whose full value of production is $136, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
49 District Sixteen El Paso VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 16th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE COMMODITY PERCENT OF PERCENT OF STATE COMMODITY VALUE CROPS $54, % 0.94% LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, & POULTRY $37, % 0.55% AG RELATED $1, % 0.08% TOTAL $92, % 0.67%
50 TABLE 24: VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FOR THE 16TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, AVERAGE Livestock and Poultry COW\CALF BEEF $4, % 0.16% FED BEEF $1, % 0.08% MILK COWS $1, % 2.72% GOATS $ % 0.01% HOGS $ % 0.04% OTHER LIVESTOCK $ % 0.00% POULTRY $ % 0.00% SHEEP $ % 0.00% TOTAL $8, % 0.14% Program Commodity RICE $ % 0.00% WHEAT $ % 0.03% BARLEY $ % 0.81% CORN $ % 0.00% OATS $ % 0.38% SORGHUM $ % 0.01% COTTON $20, % 1.35% COTTONSEED $3, % 1.22% PEANUTS $ % 0.00% SOYBEANS $ % 0.00% SUNFLOWERS $ % 0.00% SUGAR CANE $ % 0.00% SUGARBEETS $ % 0.00% MILK $28, % 3.67% HONEY $ % 4.51% MOHAIR $ % 0.00% WOOL $ % 0.00% PROGRAM TOTAL $53, % 1.21% *Includes the split county of El Paso, whose full value of production is $92, Source: County data estimated by Texas County Agricultural Extension Agents.
Amendments to the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code
Amendments to the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code Amend Section 101.4.2 Historic Buildings to read as follows: 101.4.2 Historic Buildings. Any building or structure that is listed in the State
More informationHOT TOPICS IN AIR QUALITY
HOT TOPICS IN AIR QUALITY 2014 TxDOT Planning Conference Houston-Galveston Area Council Presentation Topics 1 2 3 NAAQS Overview Near Road Air Monitors MPO and Local Program Successes EPA Advance Programs
More informationPRESTRESSED CONCRETE BENT CAPS
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BENT CAPS Christopher Miller, P.E. Table of contents 1 Conventionally Reinforced, Precast Bent Caps 3 2 Prestressed, Precast Bent Caps 4 3 Completed Projects 5-11 4 Prestressed Standard
More informationCentral & West Texas Forestlands: 2007
Forestlands 2007 Report Published August 2009 Texas Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program In 2004, Texas Forest Service, in cooperation with the Southern Research Station s Forest Inventory
More informationRevised Statewide Asphalt Binder Selection Catalog
TTI: 0-6674-01 Revised Statewide Asphalt Binder Selection Catalog Technical Report 0-6674-01-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with
More informationBiomass from Logging Residue and Mill Residue in East Texas, 2005
Biomass from Logging Residue and Mill Residue in East Texas, 2005 By Weihuan Xu, Ph.D., Principal Economist Burl Carraway, Assistant Department Head Sustainable Forestry & Economic Development May 2007
More informationBiomass from Logging Residue and Mill Residue in East Texas, 2003
Biomass from Logging Residue and Mill Residue in East Texas, 2003 By Weihuan Xu, Ph.D., Principal Economist Burl Carraway, Assistant Department Head Sustainable Forestry & Economic Development June 2005
More informationStop searching for property records at the courthouse. Find them from your desktop in minutes.
Spec Sheet DI Courthouse Stop searching for property records at the courthouse. Find them from your desktop in minutes. You no longer have to use antiquated index books to source documents. With DI Courthouse,
More informationRed-cockaded Woodpecker
T H E E N D A N G E R E D Red-cockaded Woodpecker A N D M O D E R N F O R E S T R Y I N T E X A S : L I V I N G I N H A R M O N Y A booklet by: Texas Partners in Flight, Texas Parks and Wildlife, U.S.
More informationTXDOT BRIDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
TXDOT BRIDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Steven Austin, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation 4/26/17 TxDOT Bridge Management Practices Existing bridge inventory Routine and preventive maintenance Major bridge
More informationEconomic Contributions of the Green Industry to the Texas Economy
Economic Contributions of the Green Industry to the Texas Economy Report to the Texas Nursery and Landscape Association 2016 by Marco A. Palma and Charles R. Hall Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Texas
More informationSTATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM ENERGY EFFICIENCY, WIND AND RENEWABLES. May 2008
STATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM ENERGY EFFICIENCY, WIND AND RENEWABLES May 28 Jeff Haberl, Bahman Yazdani, Charles Culp Energy Systems Laboratory Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M
More information2013 Innovation Plus Shared Risk Programs Cotton Seed Replant and Crop Loss West Region
Cotton Corn Cereals Soybeans Sugarbeets Peanuts Potatoes Horticulture Rice Tree, Nut & Vine Other 2013 Innovation Plus Shared Risk Programs Cotton Seed Replant and Crop Loss West Region 2013 Shared Risk
More informationTowards Tomorrow: Development of a Rating Path to Energy Codes RESNET Conference March 2, 2004
Towards Tomorrow: Development of a Rating Path to Energy Codes 2005 RESNET Conference March 2, 2004 Towards Tomorrow: Development of a Rating Path to Energy Codes Tom Fitzpatrick Energy Systems Laboratory,
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 25 NO. 2 March/April 2007 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication reporting
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 25 NO. 1 January/February 2007 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 22 NO. 3 May/June 2004 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication reporting
More information2015 International Energy Conservation Code. Significant Changes
2015 International Energy Conservation Code Significant Changes Shirley Ellis Energy Codes Specialist Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station shirleyellis@tamu.edu The Role of the ESL Mandated to review
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 20 NO. 5 September/October 2002 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 22 NO. 6 November/December 2004 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 22 NO. 1 January/February 2004 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication
More informationREDUCTION OF NO X EMISSIONS IN ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT PROJECTS
ESL-TR-04/05-01 REDUCTION OF NO X EMISSIONS IN ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT PROJECTS Technology Assistance Project Texas Senate Bill 5 Legislation For Reducing Pollution in Nonattainment and Affected
More informationTrans-Texas Corridor-35 Update
Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update TTC-35 Regional Briefing July 13, 2006 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Is there a need? 6 Lanes 12 Lanes 20 Lanes
More informationSTATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ) SCREENING
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ) SCREENING Joe McCarthy November 3, 2017 Table of Contents 1 2 3 4 5 6 Who at TxDOT is Involved in the SOQ Screening Process? What is the PEPS Procurement Contracting Process?
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 22 NO. 2 March/April 2004 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication reporting
More informationDFW 8-Hour Ozone SIP & Rules A&WMA Presentation May 21, Jay Tonne Kelly Keel TCEQ Air Quality Planning Section
DFW 8-Hour Ozone SIP & Rules A&WMA Presentation May 21, 2008 Jay Tonne Kelly Keel TCEQ Air Quality Planning Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Quality Planning Section
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 23 NO. 4 July/August 2005 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication reporting
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECENT AND PLANNED INVESTMENTS BY TXU ON BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN TEXAS AND AFFECTED COUNTIES AND LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECENT AND PLANNED INVESTMENTS BY TXU ON BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN TEXAS AND AFFECTED COUNTIES AND LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS The Perryman Group 510 North Valley Mills Drive, Suite 300 Waco,
More informationTRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2005
TRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2005 TEXAS CHAPTER ASFMRA 6106 VANCE JACKSON #2 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78230-3373 210.696.8909; FAX 210.696.1985 TexasASFMRA@agri-associations.org TEXAS CHAPTER
More informationTXDOT PREFERRED PRACTICES FOR STEEL UPDATE. Gregory Turco, M.S.E., PE TxDOT Bridge Division
TXDOT PREFERRED PRACTICES FOR STEEL UPDATE Gregory Turco, M.S.E., PE TxDOT Bridge Division Table of contents 1 What are the Preferred Practices? 2 Current Preferred Practices 3 4 Draft 2018 Revisions Discussion
More informationGeneral Overview of the Agricultural Act of Joe Outlaw Professor & Extension Economist Co-Director, AFPC
General Overview of the Agricultural Act of 2014 Joe Outlaw Professor & Extension Economist Co-Director, AFPC Presentation Disclaimer This Information is Based on Our Reading of the Bill and Discussions
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
$2.00 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 19 NO. 2 March/April 2001 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS How to Use This Report WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is
More informationTexas Forest Resource. Harvest Trends 2009
Harvest Trends 2009 September 2010 Texas Forest Resource Harvest Trends 2009 Yanshu Li, Ph.D. Burl Carraway Curtis VanderSchaaf, Ph.D. Forest Resource Development and Sustainable Forestry College Station,
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 21 NO. 4 July/August 2003 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is a bi-monthly publication reporting
More informationHarvest Trends 2007 November 2008
Harvest Trends 2007 November 2008 Texas Forest Resource Harvest Trends 2007 Weihuan Xu, Ph.D. Principal Economist Forest Resource Development and Sustainable Forestry College Station, Texas November 2008
More informationBASICS OF CONCRETE. Durability
BASICS OF CONCRETE Durability 2 3 4 5 6 What Deterioration Mechanisms Are We Trying To Prevent? Corrosion Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Alkali-Carbonate Reaction (ACR) Delay Ettringite Formation (DEF) Freeze-Thaw
More informationTEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS
$2.00 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS BIMONTHLY MARKET REPORT VOL. 17 NO. 4 July/August 1999 TEXAS TIMBER PRICE TRENDS How to Use This Report WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? Texas Timber Price Trends is
More informationREDUCTION FROM ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EE/RE) PROGRAMS ACROSS STATE AGENCIES IN TEXAS
A METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING INTEGRATED NOx EMISSIONS REDUCTION FROM ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EE/RE) PROGRAMS ACROSS STATE AGENCIES IN TEXAS Juan-Carlos Baltazar, Ph.D., Piljae Im Jeff
More informationMETHODOLOGY TO CALCULATE NOx EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2000 IECC/IRC CONSERVATION CODE IN TEXAS
METHODOLOGY TO CALCULATE NOx EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2000 IECC/IRC CONSERVATION CODE IN TEXAS Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D., P.E., Piljae Im, Charles Culp, Ph.D., P.E. Energy Systems
More informationTRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2006
TRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2006 TEXAS CHAPTER ASFMRA 6106 VANCE JACKSON #2 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78230-3373 210.696.8909; FAX 210.696.1985 TexasASFMRA@satx.rr.com TEXAS CHAPTER ASFMRA
More informationTexas Challenges & Texas Response
Texas Challenges & Texas Response Texas Industrial Technology Showcase, Houston, Texas March 17-19, 2003 Jerry Matthews, Executive Director Jerrymatthews@mail.utexas.edu Texas Council on Environmental
More information776 AGRICULTURE-TEXAS
AGRCULTURE-TEXAS CouNTY TABLE H.-PRNCPAL CLASSES OF LVESTOCK ON [Number of animals Jan.,, not exactly comparable with Apr.,, because THE STATE Anderson Andrews Angelina Aransas Archer Armstrong Farms re!jorting
More informationTRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2007
TRENDS IN TEXAS RURAL LAND VALUES FOR THE YEAR 2007 TEXAS CHAPTER ASFMRA 6106 VANCE JACKSON #2 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78230-3373 210.696.8909; FAX 210.696.1985 TexasASFMRA@satx.rr.com Texas Chapter ASFMRA
More informationNOTIFICATION OF ADDENDUM ADDENDUM NO. 1 DATED 2/02/2016
NOTIFICATION OF ADDENDUM ADDENDUM NO. 1 DATED 2/02/2016 Control 0306-03-121, ETC. Project STP 2016(704) Highway SH 87 County JEFFERSON Ladies/Gentlemen: Attached please find an addendum on the above captioned
More informationTexas Air Quality Nonattainment or Attainment-Maintenance Areas and Counties September 28, 2018
Texas Air Quality or -Maintenance Areas and Counties TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division Release Date: 2018 200.02.FIG Version 9 Texas Air Quality or -Maintenance Areas and Counties Texas Air Quality
More informationHurricane Rita Timber Damage Assessment Texas Forest Service 30 September 2005
Hurricane Rita Timber Damage Assessment Texas Forest Service 30 September 2005 Hurricane Rita made landfall on 24 September 2005, around 2:30 am CDT on the extreme southwest coast of Louisiana between
More informationTower 55 Rail Reliever Study
Public Meetings June 12 & 13, 2006 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Tower 55 I.H. 30 Tower 55 I.H. 35W 0 385 770 1,540 2,310 3,080 Feet Rail Volumes - 2025 Legend DART
More information2013 Texas Agricultural Custom Rates
2013 Texas Agricultural Custom Rates May 2013 Custom Rates Survey Conducted and Compiled by Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Department of Agricultural Economics Survey Coordinator: Survey Development
More informationSimplified Prescriptive Options in the Texas Residential Building Energy Code Make Compliance Easy
ESL-HH-0-05-6 Simplified Prescriptive Options in the Texas Residential Building Energy Code Make Compliance Easy Garrett A. Stone Eric M. DeVito Nelson H. Nease Partner Associate Associate Washington,
More informationTexas Chapter ASFMRA 6106 Vance Jackson #2 San Antonio, Texas ; fax
Texas Chapter ASFMRA 6106 Vance Jackson #2 San Antonio, Texas 78230 210.696.8909; fax 210.696.1985 e-mail TexasASFMRA@agri-associations.org TRENDS IN TEXAS AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUES GENERAL MARKET CONDITIONS
More informationFunding for Small Acreage Horticultural Producers. Luis A. Ribera Assistant Professor and Extension Economist June 7, 2011
2008 Farm Bill Programs for Specialty Crops Funding for Small Acreage Horticultural Producers Luis A. Ribera Assistant Professor and Extension Economist June 7, 2011 Presentation Outline The 2008 Farm
More informationHarvest Trends 2013 September 2014
Harvest Trends 2013 September 2014 OKLAHOMA Wright City Broken Bow Idabel Dierks ARKANSAS Gurdon MILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST TRENDS 2013 SMALL SAWMILL (=20MMBF/YR) PLYWOOD MILL
More informationMILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST TRENDS 2014
Harvest Trends 2014 September 2015 OKLAHOMA Wright City Broken Bow Idabel Dierks ARKANSAS Gurdon MILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST TRENDS 2014 SMALL SAWMILL (=20MMBF/YR) PLYWOOD MILL
More informationUSDA Farm Data for the HICAHS Region
USDA Farm Data for the HICAHS Region The six-state HICAHS region includes Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Through an agreement with the Southwest Center for Agricultural
More informationHarvest Trends 2015 January 2017
Harvest Trends 2015 January 2017 OKLAHOMA Wright City Broken Bow Idabel Dierks ARKANSAS Gurdon MILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST TRENDS 2015 SMALL SAWMILL (=20MMBF/YR) PLYWOOD MILL
More informationTexas Forest Resource. Harvest Trends Weihuan Xu, Ph.D. Principal Economist Forest Resource Development College Station, Texas
Texas Forest Resource Harvest Trends 2003 Weihuan Xu, Ph.D. Principal Economist Forest Resource Development College Station, Texas Publication 165 October 2004 Mountain Pine MILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST
More informationHarvest Trends 2012 September 2013
Harvest Trends 2012 September 2013 OKLAHOMA Wright City Broken Bow Idabel Dierks ARKANSAS Gurdon MILLS SURVEYED FOR HARVEST TRENDS 2012 SMALL SAWMILL (=20MMBF/YR) PLYWOOD MILL
More informationENERGY EFFICIENCY / RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) VOLUME III APPENDIX
ESL-TR-4/-5 ENERGY EFFICIENCY / RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) VOLUME III APPENDIX Annual Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality September August
More informationA brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry
A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry 2010 Total Farm Gate Value $200,000,000 - $475,048,630 $80,000,000 - $200,000,000 $45,000,000 - $80,000,000 $20,000,000 - $45,000,000 $313,000 - $20,000,000
More informationA Decade of Change in Texas Agriculture Highlights and Trends from the Census of Agriculture
E-590 10/09 A Decade of Change in Texas Agriculture Highlights and Trends from the Census of Agriculture A Decade of Change in Texas Agriculture Highlights and Trends from the Census of Agriculture Authors
More information2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016
2015 Ozone Standard David Brymer Air Quality Division Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016 Air Quality Division 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference 2015
More informationTRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 REGIONAL/STATE UPDATE
TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 REGIONAL/STATE UPDATE River of Trade Corridor Coalition Quarterly Meeting October 28, 2005 Greg J. Royster, P.E. Principal Transportation Engineer North Central Texas Council of
More informationBackground on U.S. Agricultural Policy: Food Security Objectives and Trade Implications
Background on U.S. Agricultural Policy: Food Security Objectives and Trade Implications Workshop Post Bali Agricultural and Trade Policy Options: Focus on China 23 October 2014 jason.hafemeister@fas.usda.gov
More informationAn Analysis of Historical Trends in the Farmgate Report. Brigid A. Doherty and John C. McKissick (1) Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development
An Analysis of Historical Trends in the Farmgate Report Brigid A. Doherty and John C. McKissick (1) Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development The University of Georgia CR-00-13 August 2000 Each
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21779 Updated December 13, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Farm Commodity Programs: Direct Payments, Counter-Cyclical Payments, and Marketing Loans Jim Monke
More informationORDINANCE NO. the City of Keller desires to remain current with the most recently published edition of the International Building Codes.
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CITY OF KELLER CODE OF ORDINANCES, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 4, BUILDINGS, ARTICLE I, BUILDING CODE, BY REPEALING SECTION
More informationThe Importance of Agriculture and its Transportation Issues
The Importance of Agriculture and its Transportation Issues Presented By: Dr. Steve Amosson Regents Fellow Professor and Extension Economist Texas Freight Advisory Committee Meeting Amarillo, Texas October
More information2013 Increment Report Refresher
Increment Report Refresher Presented from Corpus Christi, TX November 25, Levi Russell Assistant Professor & Extension Economist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Corpus Christi, Texas What is the Increment
More informationTechnical Advisory Panel
Air Victoria Community and Technical Advisory Panel Meeting November 4, 2009 Marie Lester Environmental Programs Coordinator 2009 Victoria Ozone Season Levels Year 1 st high 2 nd high 3 rd high 4 th high
More informationMinimum Core Data Set
Global Strategy IMPROVING AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL STATISTICS IN ASIA PACIFIC Minimum Core Data Set Regional Office for the Asia-Pacific Regional Action Plan to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics
More informationTexas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-01/1859-1 4. Title and Subtitle DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANUAL FOR SMALL
More informationThe Impact of Increased Planting Flexibility on Planting Decisions Across Texas
The Impact of Increased Planting Flexibility on Planting Decisions Across Texas J. Marc Raulston Agricultural & Food Policy Center Texas A&M Dept. of Agricultural Economics 2124 TAMUS College Station,
More informationCommodity Value Enhancement Fund Analysis
Commodity Value Enhancement Fund Analysis AFPC Issue Paper 01-2 Abner W. Womack Edward G. Smith Agricultural and Food Policy Center Department of Agricultural Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
More informationPublic Policy and Agriculture
Public Policy and Agriculture Dr. Jeff Burkhardt With Dr. John VanSickle Food & Resource Economics Department University of Florida Florida Outlook Conference November 13, 2012 Why Public Policy? Why Public
More informationLesson 42. Agriculture in Texas TEXAS ALMANAC TEACHERS GUIDE. Principal Crops Vegetable Crops Fruits & Nuts. A mature wheat field in Texas.
Lesson 42 TEXAS ALMANAC TEACHERS GUIDE Agriculture in Texas Principal Crops Vegetable Crops Fruits & Nuts Social Studies TEKS 4-6, 8, 11, 12, 21, 22, 23 7-7, 8, 9, 12, 21, 22, 23 8-14, 29, 30 STAAR 4,
More informationHurricane Harvey Round 1 Councils of Governments Method of Distribution Guidelines
Texas General Land Office Community Development and Revitalization Program cdr@glo.texas.gov 1.800.998.4456 Hurricane Harvey Round 1 Councils of Governments Method of Distribution Guidelines Page 1 of
More informationHow the Drought of 2011 Impacted Us and the Future. By: Ken Clark, Commissioner Galveston County
How the Drought of 2011 Impacted Us and the Future By: Ken Clark, Commissioner Galveston County Overview The Drought of 2011 Planning Process Possible Solutions The Drought of 2011 Drought in Review Economic
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20848 Updated February 7, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Farm Commodity Programs: A Short Primer Summary Geoffrey S. Becker Specialist in Agricultural Policy Resources,
More informationFarm Commodity Policy: Programs and Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21999 Updated March 8, 2007 Summary Farm Commodity Policy: Programs and Issues for Congress Jim Monke Analyst in Agricultural Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Farm commodity
More information2O16 MISSISSIPPI. agriculture, forestry and natural resources
2O16 MISSISSIPPI agriculture, forestry and natural resources THAD COCHRAN CHAMPION FOR MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURE U.S. Senator Thad Cochran has dedicated 45 years of service to the state of Mississippi. He
More informationGlobal Strategy. Session 1.2: Minimum Set of Core Data Items. Module 1: Sampling in the Context of the Global Minimum Set of Core Data Items
Global Strategy IMPROVING AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL STATISTICS IN ASIA PACIFIC Module 1: Sampling in the Context of the Global Minimum Set of Core Data Items Session 1.2: Minimum Set of Core Data Items 13
More informationAn Economic Examination of Potential Ethanol Production in Texas
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University An Economic Examination of Potential Ethanol Production in Texas AFPC Research Report 3-1 February 3, 23 Funding provided in part by the Texas
More informationBarndominium builders brazoria county
Barndominium builders brazoria county * All prices above do not include a slab. Slab sq ft price is about $8.50 a sq ft. This apartment barn has space on 02/04/2018 the bottom level for horse and dog stalls,
More informationENERGY EFFICIENCY/RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP)
ESL-TR-17-10-01 ENERGY EFFICIENCY/RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) PRELIMINARY REPORT: INTEGRATED NOX EMISSIONS SAVINGS FROM EE/RE PROGRAMS STATEWIDE Annual Report to
More informationENERGY EFFICIENCY/RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP)
ESL-TR-16-10-01 ENERGY EFFICIENCY/RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) PRELIMINARY REPORT: INTEGRATED NOX EMISSIONS SAVINGS FROM EE/RE PROGRAMS STATEWIDE Annual Report to
More informationest Proud Member of: Strike the rock and water will come out of it for the people to drink Exodus 17:6b
est. 1980 Proud Member of: Strike the rock and water will come out of it for the people to drink Exodus 17:6b Preferred Builders List Over the three decades we have been building wells, we have developed
More informationSIP Challenges in Houston-Galveston-Brazoria. Chief Engineer s Office, Air Quality Division
SIP Challenges in 2008 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Chief Engineer s Office, Air Quality Division Susana M. Hildebrand, Air Quality P.E., Division Director HGB SIP Challenges in 2008 February 12, 2008 Page
More informationTexas Senate Bill 5 - Reducing Pollution in Non-Attainment Areas: An Overview of the Legislation
Texas Senate Bill 5 - Reducing Pollution in Non-Attainment Areas: An Overview of the Legislation C.Culp, J.Haberl, B.Yazdani, T. Fitzpatrick, J.Bryant, D.Turner Energy Systems Laboratory, Texas A&M University
More informationIMPACTS OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON TEXAS ROADS
IMPACTS OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ON TEXAS ROADS Zheng Jenny Li, PhD, P.E. (Corresponding Author) Transportation Engineer Texas Department of Transportation MNT Pavement Preservation Branch 7901 North IH35
More informationHurricane Ike Timber Damage Assessment Texas Forest Service 17 September 2008
Hurricane Ike Timber Damage Assessment Texas Forest Service 17 September 2008 Hurricane Ike made landfall on Saturday, 13 September 2008, at 2:10 am CDT as a Category 2 storm with 105 mph winds on Galveston
More informationContribution of Agriculture to Oklahoma s Economy: 2015
Contribution of Agriculture to Oklahoma s Economy: 2015 E-1046 Department of Agricultural Economics Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Dave Shideler, Ph.D.
More information1979 Food and Agricultural Outlook
1979 Food and Agricultural Outlook NEIL A. STEVENS and CLIFTON B, LUTTRELL ~HE 1979 forecast of U.S. food and agricultural developments by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) points to larger food
More informationRegional Mobility Authorities
Regional Mobility Authorities Testimony before the Senate Transportation Committee March 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Capitol Building Extension, Room E1.016 INTRODUCTION It is the Texas Department of Transportation
More informationWater Reuse Webinar. North Central Texas Council of Governments Environment and Development Department August 22, 2017
Water Reuse Webinar North Central Texas Council of Governments Environment and Development Department August 22, 2017 Please welcome our first speaker: Glenn Clingenpeel Trinity River Authority Reuse,
More informationThe Impact of Rising Energy Prices on Income for Representative Farms in the Western United States
The Impact of Rising Energy Prices on Income for Representative Farms in the Western United States J. Marc Raulston, George M. Knapek, Joe L. Outlaw, James W. Richardson, Steven L. Klose and David P. Anderson
More informationTrans Texas Corridor-35 (TTC-35) Study Area Identification Report
Texas Department of Transportation Texas Turnpike Authority Division Trans Texas Corridor-35 (TTC-35) Study Area Identification Report 19 April 2004 updated July 2004 and July 2005 TTC-35 Study Area Identification
More informationSTANDARDS FOR MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY FOR 2007*
U2020 STANDARDS FOR MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY FOR 2007* These standards were estimated from 2006 prices and costs, along with production and physical inputs from previous years. (Estimates were made as of
More informationTennessee Agri-Tourism: Another Opportunity for Tennessee s Small Farms
Tennessee Agri-Tourism: Another Opportunity for Tennessee s Small Farms Agriculture is Big Business in Tennessee $ 32.7 billion directly to Tennessee s economy each year food, fiber and forestry systems
More informationFayette County Appraisal District
Fayette County Appraisal District Agricultural Guidelines 2017 A SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE OF TEXAS PROPERTY TAX MANUAL FOR THE APPRAISAL OF AGRICULTUAL LAND AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRACTICES
More informationFayette County Appraisal District
Fayette County Appraisal District Agricultural Guidelines 2016 A SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE OF TEXAS PROPERTY TAX MANUAL FOR THE APPRAISAL OF AGRICULTUAL LAND AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRACTICES
More information