ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS OF ANGUS BULLS FOR DIFFERENCES IN MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1'2'3
|
|
- Alexandra Peters
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS OF ANGUS BULLS FOR DIFFERENCES IN MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1'2'3 M. E. Davis 4, G. R. Wilson 4, W. R. Harvey a and T. B. Turner 4 The Ohio State University, Columbus and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster ABSTRACT Effects of adjusting postweaning feed:gain ratios for differences in maintenance requirements as recommended by the Beef Improvement Federation were examined utiliing 171 individually fed, purebred Angus bulls. The residual correlation (year and sire effects removed) between unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiency was.85 (P.01). The Spearman correlation between ranks of the bulls based on the two measures of efficiency was.79 (P.01). Although product-moment and rank correlations between unadjusted and adjusted feed:gain ratios were large, the two methods of evaluating efficiency often identified different bulls as being among the four most or four least efficient in the conversion of feed into post-weaning gain. When unadjusted feed:gain ratios were used to evaluate efficiency, bulls that were more efficient were lighter in weight at the beginning of the 140-d postweaning performance test, gained more rapidly and consumed less feed during the test, and were taller and leaner at the conclusion of the test. When differences due to maintenance requirements were removed, bulls that gained more rapidly and were heavier, taller and slightly fatter at the end of the test were superior in the conversion of feed into postweaning gain. Correlations of on-test weight and feed consumption with adjusted feed:gain ratios were near ero. On-test age was not closely related to either adjusted or unadjusted feed efficiency. (Key Words: Beef Cattle, Feed Conversion, Efficiency, Maintenance Adjustment.) Introduction Postweaning feed efficiency, generally expressed as the feed required per unit of gain, or the reciprocal, is an important component of life cycle efficiency of beef production. Variation in feed efficiency among young growing cattle of the same age and sex and treated alike is primarily a function of maintenance requirements and rate and composition of gain (Cartwright, 1983). Maintenance requirements are 1Salaries and research support provided by State and Federal Funds appropriated to the Ohio Agr. Res. and Dev. Center, The Ohio State Univ. Journal Article No The experiment was a contributing project to North Central Regional Project NC-1, "The Improvement of Beef Cattle Through Breeding Methods." athe authors wish to thank Mr. C. B. Boyles and Mr. J. D. Wells for their excellent technical assistance. 4Anim. Sci. Dept., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus Received January 11, Accepted July 18, generally considered to be proportional to metabolic weight (weight raised to the.75 power). Therefore, the Beef Improvement Federation (B/F, 1981) recommends that when feed consumption per unit gain is evaluated in time-constant intervals, the values should be adjusted for differences in maintenance requirements by multiplying by a ratio of test group average metabolic weight to the individual's own metabolic weight. The present study was undertaken to compare unadjusted and adjusted (BIF, 1981) feed efficiency ratios of yearling Angus bulls and to examine relationships of efficiency ratios with various other performance traits. Materials and Methods Source of Data. As part of a divergent selection experiment (high vs low feed efficiency) designed to obtain a realied heritability estimate for postweaning feed efficiency, 35 bull calves were selected each year from 1979 through 1983 from the purebred Angus herd located at the Eastern Ohio Resource Develop JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, Vol. 61, No. 6, 1985
2 1396 DAVIS ET AL. ment Center, Belle Valley, to be fed in a 140-d postweaning performance test. Bulls selected for the performance test generally were those with superior weaning weight and conformation. An effort also was made to select sire groups that contained at least three bull progeny. Numbers of bulls completing the performance test in 1979 through 1983 were 35, 34, 35, 34 and 33, respectively. Numbers of sire groups represented in 1979 through 1983, respectively, were 16, 7, 10, 8 and 7. Feeding and Management System. Following weaning at approximately 7 mo of age, bulls were placed in a three-sided barn where they were group-fed for 1 wk. Bulls then were randomly assigned to individual feed bunks where they were tied for 2 h each morning and 2 h each afternoon. After allowing 1 wk for the bulls to adjust to the tieing procedure, on-test weights were taken and recording of individual feed consumption was begun. Average on-test age and weight was 223 d and 235 kg, respectively (table 1). Throughout the 2-wk adjustment period and 140-d test period, bulls were fed the concentrate diet shown in table 2. Bulls also received approximately 2.27 kg of hay. head -1 "d-1 during these periods. Weights and feed consumption were recorded by 28-d periods. Weights were taken in the morning before feeding. At the conclusion of the 140-d performance test, the bulls were weighed on two consecutive days and the average of the two weights was used as the final weight. On the day the second off-test weight was taken, hip height and backfat thickness (as estimated by sonoray) were recorded. Adjustment of Feed:Gain Ratios. From these individually-fed bulls, the three most efficient bulls (in terms of kg of feed required per kg of gain) and the three least efficient bulls were selected each year to be mated to approximately 20 cows each in a test herd of Angus cows also located at the Eastern Ohio Resource Development Center. The fourth most and fourth least efficient bulls were kept also in the event of injury to one of the three most or three least efficient bulls. Examination of the effect adjustment of feed efficiency ratios for differences in maintenance requirements using the recommended BIF procedure (BIF, 1981) would have on the identification of the four most and four least efficient bulls was desired. Adjustment was accomplished by multiplying feed:gain ratios by the ratio of test group average metabolic midweight (Wil 7s ) to the individual's own metabolic midweight (Wii7s) as follows: adjusted feed efficiency = (W i-..ts/wijts.)(feed/gain), where subscript i refers to the i th year of the test (1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 or 1983) and subscript j refers to the jth bull within the i th test. Midweights were estimated as 1/2 (initial weight on test + final weight off test). This procedure adjusts feed:gain ratios of heavier-than-average bulls downward because they would be expected to have above-average maintenance requirements and, therefore, above- TABLE 1. MEANS AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS FOR WEANING WEIGHT AND POSTWEANING PERFORMANCE TRAITS Trait Mean SD a 205-d weight, kg On-test age, d On-test weight, kg Average daily gain, kg/d Final weight, kg Feed consumption, kg 1, Backfat thickness, mm Height, cm Unadjusted feed efficiency, kg feed/kg gain Adjusted feed efficiencyb, kg feed/kg gain acomputed as the square root of the error mean square after removing variation due to the fixed effect of years and the random effect of sires nested within years. badjusted for differences in maintenance requirements as recommended by BIF (1981).
3 ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS 1397 TABLE 2. COMPOSITION OF EXPERIMENTAL DIETa, b Ingredient %e Corn, shelled, crimped (IFN ) Oats, crimped (IFN ) Corn cobs, ground (IFN ) Dehydrated alfalfa (IFN ) Wheat middlings (IFN ) Soybean meal (IFN ) Sugarcane molasses (IFN ) 3.00 Dicalcium phosphate (IFN ).50 Limestone (IFN ).55 Salt, trace mineralied d.50 Sodium bentonite.40 Selenium.05 athe diet also contained 545 to 682 IU vitamin A/kg, 45 to 68 IU vitamin D/kg and.9 to 1.4 IU vitamin E/kg. bthe diet contained 68.5% TDN and 13.7% protein. CDry matter basis. dcontained.35% Zn,.28% Mn,.175% Fe,.035% Cu,.007% Co and.007% I. average metabolic weights. Feed:gain ratios of lighter-than-average bulls will be adjusted upward because they are expected to have below-average maintenance requirements and metabolic weights. It should be noted that even though maintenance requirements are generally considered to be proportional to metabolic weight, there may be differences in maintenance requirements that are not eliminated by the metabolic midweight adjustment used in this study. Statistical Analysis. To examine effects of adjusting feed efficiency ratios for differences in maintenance requirements, product-moment correlations (SAS, 1979) were calculated among the dependent variables: 205-d weight, on-test weight, on-test age, average daily gain, final weight, feed consumption during the 140-d test, backfat thickness, hip height, unadjusted feed efficiency and adjusted feed efficiency, using residual variances and covariances obtained after removing variation due to the fixed effect of years and the random effect of sires nested within years. Correlations were also calculated separately for each year after removing variation due to sires. Spearman correlation coefficients (SAS, 1979), which are correlations between ranks of variables, were obtained between unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiency as an indication of the degree of correspondence between ranks of the bulls based upon the two measures of efficiency. In order to examine the relationship between feed efficiency adjusted for differences in maintenance requirements and feed efficiency during a weight-constant interval, weightconstant efficiency was predicted by adjusting feed:gain ratios to the mean on-test weight and mean final weight using multiple regression analysis (SAS, 1979). Data were analyed separately by years and with all years combined. Results and Discussion Means and standard deviations for 205-d weight and for postweaning performance traits considered in this analysis are presented in table 1. Relationships of Unadjusted Feed Efficiency with other Performance Traits. The residual correlation between unadjusted feed efficiency and 205-d weight was positive (r =.28, P.01; table 3), indicating that bulls that were heavier at weaning were less efficient in their postweaning gains. Bulls that were heavier at the beginning of the test had higher feed:gain ratios, as evidenced by the correlation of.50 (P.01) between unadjusted feed efficiency and on-test weight (table 3). This result was likely due to the greater maintenance requirements of the heavier bulls. The larger correlation of unadjusted feed efficiency with on-test weight than with 205-d weight presumably resulted from the fact that postweaning feed consumption was more closely correlated with on-test weight (r =.43, P.01) than with 205-d weight (r =.28, P.01). No tendency existed for bulls that were younger or older at the beginning of the 140-d test to be more efficient in the conversion of feed into gain. The lack of a significant effect of on-test age may have been due to the small amount of variation in this trait (coefficient of variation = 3.2%). In a postweaning performance test involving Hereford, Angus and Red Angus bulls, Linton (1977) observed that older and heavier bulls were less efficient because of higher maintenance requirements, fatter composition of gain and intrinsic differences in efficiency inherent with advancing age. He suggested that feed:gain ratios should be adjusted for age on test and metabolic weight before individuals are compared for genetic merit. Adjustment for on-test age would not have resulted in
4 1398 DAVIS ET AL. significant changes in phenotypic rankings of bulls based on feed efficiency in the present study. Bulls with larger daily gains were more efficient (r , P.01). Therefore, bulls with superior unadjusted feed efficiencies were light in weight at the beginning of the performance test and gained rapidly during the test. The net result was a near ero relationship between final weight and unadjusted feed efficiency (table 3). As an animal increases in weight, his maintenance requirement increases proportionately. In addition, bulls with heavier final weights were fatter (r -.40, P.01). Both of these factors have a negative influence on efficiency. Bulls that had heavier final weights also gained more rapidly on test (r =.75, P.01) a factor, however, that increases efficiency by reducing maintenance requirements per kg of gain. Smith et al. (1976) and Cundiff et al. (1981) reported that evaluation of postweaning feed efficiency over time-constant intervals gives an advantage to breed groups that gain rapidly relative to the weight they maintain. This finding was true also for individuals within the breed used in the present study. A number of authors have reported favorable genetic and phenotypic relationships between gain and efficiency of gain during time-constant intervals (Pierce et al., 1954; Carter and Kincaid, 1959; Brown and Gifford, 1962; Rollins et al., 1962; Koch et al., 1963; Blum, 1976; Linton, 1977). A certain portion of this favorable relationship is automatic because unadjusted efficiency is simply the ratio of feed to gain. As an animal's gain increases in a time-constant period, his feed:gain ratio decreases. A portion of this correlation also is attributable-to the negative relationship between rate of gain and maintenance requirement per kilogram of gain. Bulls consuming more feed had higher feed:gain ratios (r =.36, P.01; table 3). similar results were reported by Brown and Gifford (1962), Bogart and England (1971), Blum (1976) and Linton (1977). To some extent, this correlation is automatic, as feed is the numerator of the feed:gain ratio. The correlation of unadjusted feed efficiency with backfat thickness at the end of the 140-d test was positive but nonsignificant in all years except 1980, in which the correlation was negative but slight. A slight tendency, therefore, existed for fatter bulls to be less efficient in most years. Blum (1976) reported a near ero genetic correlation between backfat thickness at the conclusion of a 140-d performance test and feed:gain ratios. Linton (1977) found that fat thickness did not have a significant effect on feed efficiency, although bulls that were fatter phenotypically were less efficient. Bulls with greater skeletal sie, as indicated by hip height, tended to have superior unadjusted feed efficiencies (r = -.14, P>.05). Blum (1976) found that bulls that were taller at the shoulder at a year of age were genetically more efficient in their postweaning gains. Relationships of Adjusted Feed Efficiency with other Performance Traits. When differences due to maintenance requirements were removed from the efficiency estimates, correlations with 205-d weight and on-test weight were reduced to nonsignificant levels (table 3). Therefore, the higher unadjusted feed efficiency ratios of the bulls with heavier on-test weights were due to their greater maintenance requirements. Correlations with on-test age remained nonsignificant after adjustment for differences in maintenance requirements. Blum (1976) found that adjusting feed:gain ratio for midweight m and age on test using partial regression coefficients reduced the genetic correlation between 205-d weight and feed:gain ratio adjusted for age and weight on test from to Carter and Kincaid (1959) reported genetic and phenotypic correlations of.66 and.24, respectively, between 182-d weight and total digestible nutrients/cwt gain when the latter was adjusted for mean live weight. Correlations with average daily gain were more strongly negative (r = -.71 vs -.47) when adjusted feed:gain ratios were used than when unadjusted feed:gain ratios were used. A similar result was noted by Blum (1976). Linton (1977) reported an essentially ero correlation between total gain on test and efficiency of feed use when efficiency was adjusted for average daily maintenance requirement of each bull. The near ero correlation with on-test weight and large negative correlation with average daily gain resulted in a negative and highly significant relationship between final weight and adjusted feed:gain ratio (r = -.53; table 3). Correlations of feed consumption with adjusted efficiency were negative and nonsignificant in the 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982 birth year groups, and positive but nonsignificant in the 1983 birth year group. The corre-
5 ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS 1399 ~J Z tl U. e~ c~ Z C~ [-'~n cn~. Z 0 5e 02: e~ c~ M II I I I I I..... ~.. ; J J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. ~ I t l l I i l l l - :: -. : : :. ~. ~. ~. ~'~'~ ~. ~. ~ ~. I I I * I..~.. ~. I 9 " " [ I......~,, = ~ u.~h ~ o >, 9 ~,.~ r162 ~ Z g o -~..~ u ~.~..~ ~.~ ~ o lation pooled over years was near ero. The genetic correlation between feed consumption and feed efficiency adjusted for midweight was.04 in a study by Koch et al. (1963). Blum (1976) reported a genetic correlation of between feed consumption and adjusted feed:gain ratio. Linton (1977), however, obtained a genetic correlation of between feed consumption and gain:feed ratios adjusted for daily maintenance requirements. Adjustment for maintenance requirements changed correlations with backfat thickness from slightly positive to slightly negative. Therefore, bulls carrying more condition were slightly more efficient as measured by adjusted feed:gain ratio. Adjustment for maintenance requirements also changed correlations of feed:gain ratio with backfat thickness from slightly positive to slightly negative in the study by Blum (1976). Fatter bulls were less efficient in terms of both unadjusted and adjusted efficiency in the study by Linton (1977). Hip height exhibited a negative correlation (r = -.34, P.01; table 3) with adjusted feed: gain ratio, indicating that taller bulls were more efficient in the conversion of feed into gain. Therefore, bulls that were lighter in weight at the beginning of the postweaning performance test, gained more rapidly and consumed less feed during the test and were taller and leaner at the end of the test were more efficient in terms of unadjusted feed:gain ratios. When differences due to maintenance requirements were removed, bulls that gained rapidly and were heavier, tauer and slightly fatter at the end of the test excelled in the conversion of feed into postweaning gain. On-test weight and feed consumption had essentially a ero correlation with adjusted feed:gain ratios. On-test age was not related to either adjusted or unadjusted feed efficiency. Relationships similar to those presented in table 3 are observed when comparing the performance characteristics of the four most efficient and four least efficient bulls (table 4). When means were averaged over the 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 data sets, the bulls with the lowest unadjusted feed:gain ratios were lighter in weight at 205-d of age and at the start of the postweaning performance test, gained more rapidly and consumed less feed during the 140 d on test, and were slightly heavier, leaner (as estimated by backfat thickness) and taller at the conclusion of the test than were the bulls with the highest unadjusted
6 1400 DAVIS ET AL. O O Z O~ m~ ~Z Z m [..-. ZZ OU~ rn [.. ea ~176 r = >, g g ~ e,l e,l e-i e,l eq e,l ~,1 eq e,i eq e,i e,i ~o....~ ~o ip..~ v e~ N.~.~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~gg~ feed:gain ratios. When identified using adjusted feed efficiency ratios, the four most and four least efficient bulls were similar in 205-d weight and on-test weight. The most efficient bulls gained more rapidly and consumed more feed during the test, had slightly greater backfat thickness and were taller at the hips at the end of the 140 d on test than were the least efficient bulls. A tendency existed for the least efficient bulls to have greater on-test ages when unadjusted feed efficiency ratios were utilied, while the most efficient bulls were older at the beginning of the test when adjusted feed efficiency ratios were used. Relationship Between Adjusted and Unadjusted Feed Efficiency. Residual correlations between unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiency ratios obtained after removing variation due to sires ranged from.75 (P.01) in the 1981 performance test to.91 (P.01) in the 1980 test (table 3). The residual correlation between adjusted and unadjusted feed efficiency obtained after removing variation due to years and sires within years was.85 (P.01). Blum (1976) reported a genetic correlation of between feed:gain ratios adjusted for age and weight on test and feed:gain ratios adjusted for midweigbt "Ts and age. Linton (1977) observed genetic and phenotypic correlations of and.81, respectively, between gain:feed ratios and gain:feed ratios adjusted for average daily maintenance requirement of each bull. Spearman correlations between ranks of the bulls based upon unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiencies were highly significant in each of the five postweaning performance tests (r =.81,.92,.70,.71 and.70 in 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively). Pooled over years, the rank correlation was.79. Therefore, bulls ranked similarly when adjusted and unadjusted feed efficiency ratios were used. However, a number of different bulls would be identified as having the highest or lowest feed:gain ratios if the criterion was unadjusted rather than adjusted feed efficiency. In 1982 and 1983, the four bulls having the highest feed:gain ratios were the same when unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiency were used as the methods of evaluation. In 1980, the four bulls having the lowest feed:gain ratios were the same regardless of the method of evaluation, while in 1981, 1982 and 1983 three of the four bulls were the same. Only one bull ranked among the four least efficient based upon both
7 ADJUSTMENT OF POSTWEANING FEED:GAIN RATIOS 1401 adjusted and unadjusted feed efficiency in the 1981 performance test, however. Cundiff et al. (1981, 1984) noted that breed group means for feed efficiency adjusted for differences in maintenance requirements as recommended by BIF (1981) were very similar to breed group means for efficiency during a weight-constant interval from 250 to 470 kg (r --.99). They suggested that the BIF procedure yields estimates for feed efficiency that are reasonably close approximations of feed efficiency during weight-constant intervals. In order to test this hypothesis, residual correlations were calculated between feed: gain ratios adjusted for differences in maintenance requirements as recommended by BIF (1981) and feed:gain ratios adjusted to a weightconstant interval via covariates for mean on-test weight and mean final weight. When data were analyed separately by year using the mean on-test weight and final weight in a given year as covariates, residual correlations between the two measures of efficiency obtained after removing variation due to sires were.57,.58,.71,.67 and.50 (P.01) in the 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 data sets, respectively. When data from all years were analyed simultaneously, the residual correlation (year and sire effects removed) between feed efficiency adjusted for maintenance and feed efficiency adjusted for mean on-test weight (235 kg) and mean final weight (425 kg) was.57 (P.01). Efficiency ratios adjusted using the BIF procedure, therefore, were more closely related to unadjusted efficiency measured in the 140-d time-constant interval (r =.85) than to efficiency adjusted to a weight-constant interval (r =.57). It does not appear that the BIF method of adjustment yielded efficiency ratios closely approximating those that would be found in a weight-constant interval within the Angus bulls used in this study. Conclusions Even though product-moment and rank correlations between unadjusted and adjusted feed:gain ratios were large, the two methods of evaluation did not necessarily identify the same bulls as being most efficient or least efficient. If the intent is to evaluate bulls for efficiency of gain, it is necessary to adjust the efficiency ratios for differences in maintenance requirements. Failure to do so results in feed:gain ratios that reflect not efficiency of gain, but feed needed for both maintenance and gain. Therefore, the recommendations of BIF (1981) should be followed in adjusting feed efficiency data. Literature Cited BIF Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs. Beef Improvement Federation, USDA Ext. Serv., Program Aid Blum, J. K Selection for feed conversion: Direct and correlated responses and genetic parameters. M.S. Thesis. Kansas State Univ., Manhattan. Bogart, R. and N. C. England Feed consumption, daily gain and feed required per unit of gain in beef calves. J. Anita. Sci. 32:420. Brown, C. J. and W. Gifford Estimates of heritability and genetic correlations among certain traits of performance tested bulls. Arkansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull Carter, R. C. and C. M. Kincaid Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters in beef cattle. III. Genetic and phenotpyic correlations among economic characters. J. Anim. Sci. 18:331. Cartwright, T. C The role of dairy cattle genes in United States beef production. J. Dairy Sci. 66:1409. Cundiff, L. V., R. M. Koch and K. E. Gregory Characteriation of biological types of cattle (cycle III). IV. Postweaning growth and feed efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 312. Cundiff, L. V., R. M. Koch, K. E. Gregory and G. M. Smith Characteriation of biological types of cattle - cycle II. IV. Postweaning growth and feed efficiency of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 53:332. Koch, R. M., L. A. Swiger, D. Chambers and K. E. Gregory Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22:486. Linton, A. C Genetic aspects of feed efficiency. Ph.D. Dissertation. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins. Pierce, C. D., H. G. Avery, M. Burris and R. Bogart Rate and efficiency of gains in beef cattle. II. Some factors affecting performance testing. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 33. Rollins, W. C., F. D. Carroll, J.W.T. Pollack and M. N. Kudoda Beef cattle performance and progeny tests for gain, efficiency, carcass conformation and earliness of maturity. J. Anim. Sci. 21:200. SAS SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. Smith, G. M., D. B. Laster, L. V. Cundiff and K. E. Gregory Characteriation of biological types of cattle. II. Postweaning growth and feed efficiency of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 43:37.
Mike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14
2014 Beef Improvement Federation Meeting! The optimum beef cow is indeed an elusive beast. I have searched for her for more than 20 years, and have come up empty handed. But I believe I m getting close.!
More informationPERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland
PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS SUMMARY D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland Nursing steer calves on fescue pasture were used to determine the effects of supplemental
More informationAGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1. ABSTRACt"
AGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1 D. L. Lubritz 2, K. Forrest 2 and O. W. Robison 2 North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7621 ABSTRACt" Milk production in
More informationRELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~ R. S. Kersey DeNise 2, D. E. Ray 2, A. M. Lane 2, V. L. Rundle 3 and M. Torabi 2 University of Arizona Tucson 85721 ABSTRACT
More informationCan We Select for RFI in Heifers?
Can We Select for RFI in Heifers? L. Kriese-Anderson, Associate Professor 1 1 Extension Animal Scientist, Auburn University, Auburn AL Introduction Cow efficiency has been an important topic of conversation
More informationBREED MEANS FOR AVERAGE DAILY GAIN, FEED CONVERSION AND INTAKE OF BEEF BULLS DURING POSTWEANING FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE TESTS112
BREED MEANS FOR AVERAGE DAILY GAIN, FEED CONVERSION AND INTAKE OF BEEF BULLS DURING POSTWEANING 112 J. J. Chewning, A. H. Brown, Jr., Z. B. Johnson and C. J. Brown University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
More informationWheat Pasture Intake by Early-Weaned Calves
Wheat Pasture Intake by Early-Weaned Calves 1998 Animal Science Research Report Pages 202-209 Authors: Story In Brief S.I. Paisley, C.J. Ackerman, H.T. Purvis II and G.W. Horn Forty fall born Angus x Hereford
More informationUnderstanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)
Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA3068 Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Brett Barham Associate Professor Animal Science Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: http://www.uaex.edu
More informationGenomic-Polygenic and Polygenic Evaluation of Multibreed Angus-Brahman Cattle for Direct and Maternal Growth Traits Under Subtropical Conditions
Genomic-Polygenic and Polygenic Evaluation of Multibreed Angus-Brahman Cattle for Direct and Maternal Growth Traits Under Subtropical Conditions M. A. Elzo 1, M. G. Thomas 2, D. D. Johnson 1, C. A. Martinez
More informationImpact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center
Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center Importance of Feed Efficiency By 2050, the world population is expected to increase
More informationSELECTION IN HEREFORD CATTLE. SELECTION INTENSITY, GENERATION INTERVAL AND INDEXES IN RETROSPECT
I. SELECTION IN HEREFORD CATTLE. SELECTION INTENSITY, GENERATION INTERVAL AND INDEXES IN RETROSPECT L. N. Nwakalor 1, J. S. Brinks 2 and G. V. Richardson 3 Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
More informationAlison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.
The Value of Accuracy Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and Genomics University of California, Davis alvaneenennaam@ucdavis.edu (530) 752-7942 animalscience.ucdavis.edu/animalbiotech
More informationThe Growth Performance of Two Lines of Pig Reared under Two Differing Environmental Conditions
The Growth Performance of Two Lines of Pig Reared under Two Differing Environmental Conditions D. N. Hamilton*, M. Ellis* 1, B. F. Wolter*, F. K. McKeith and E. R. Wilson * Department of Animal Sciences,
More informationBeef Production. in a Crisscross Breeding System Involving Angus, Brahman, and Hereford
Beef Production in a Crisscross Breeding System Involving Angus, Brahman, and Hereford October 1973 Bulletin 759 (technical) Agricultural Experiment Stations Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
More informationStrategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids
Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids A.S Leaflet R1727 Allen Trenkle, professor of animal science Summary Performance and carcass data from 624 steers in three
More informationof Nebraska - Lincoln
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science Animal Science Department December 2002 Breed comparisons of Angus, Charolais,
More informationEffect of Residual Feed Intake, Gender, and Breed Composition on Plasma Urea Nitrogen Concentration in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Herd
Effect of Residual Feed Intake, Gender, and Breed Composition on Plasma Urea Nitrogen Concentration in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Herd Bob Myer 1 Mauricio Elzo 2 Feed efficient beef cattle appear to more
More information1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
Producer Prediction of Optimal Sire Characteristics Impacting Farm Profitibility In a Stochastic Bio-Economic Decision Framework William Herring, and Vern Pierce 1 Copyright 1999 by Vern Pierce. All rights
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic analysis of residual feed intakes and other performance test traits of Japanese Black cattle from revised protocol
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2008.00529.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic analysis of residual feed intakes and other performance test traits of Japanese Black cattle from revised protocol Takeshi OKANISHI, 1 Masayuki
More informationGenetic and Environmental Parameters for Mature Weight and Other Growth Measures in Polled Hereford Cattle'
Published December 11, 2014 Genetic and Environmental Parameters for Mature Weight and Other Growth Measures in Polled Hereford Cattle' K. D. Bullockz, J. K. Bertrand, and L. L. Benyshek Department of
More informationComparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1
Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1 R. N. Funston 2 and G. H. Deutscher University of Nebraska,
More informationComparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake
Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake J. W. Adcock, D. B. Faulkner, D. W. Shike and K. M. Retallick Background With rising inputs, increased pressure has been put on cow-calf
More informationHETEROSIS RETENTION FOR LIVE WEIGHT IN ADVANCED GENERATIONS OF A HEREFORD AND ANGUS CROSSBREEDING EXPERIMENT
HETEROSIS RETENTION FOR LIVE WEIGHT IN ADVANCED GENERATIONS OF A HEREFORD AND ANGUS CROSSBREEDING EXPERIMENT C.A. MORRIS, R.L. BAKER, W.D. HOHENBOKEN, D.L. JOHNSON, N.G. CULLEN Ruakura Animal Research
More informationPrediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound
Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound A.S. Leaflet R53 D.E. Wilson, professor of animal science, G.H. Rouse, professor of animal science, G.-H. Graser, research director, University
More informationUse of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers
Animal Industry Report AS 650 ASL R1869 2004 Use of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers Abebe T. Hassen Iowa State University Doyle E. Wilson
More informationEffect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale Price of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary
2000 Animal Science Research Report Pages 14-19 Effect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary S.C. Smith, D.R. Gill, T.R. Evicks and J. Prawl
More informationUltrasound feedlot sorting. Evaluation of feedlot sorting system using ultrasound and computer technology
1 Ultrasound feedlot sorting Evaluation of feedlot sorting system using ultrasound and computer technology A. J. Garmyn, D. W. Moser, and J. Minick Bormann Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506 785-532-2459
More informationEffects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves
Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves J.P. Banta, D.L. Lalman, C.R. Krehbiel, and R.P. Wettemann Story in Brief
More informationMore cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit
E-165 8/09 Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Selection for Carcass Merit Stephen P. Hammack* More cattle are being marketed on carcass merit. This has prompted greater interest in breeding
More informationEFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS. Story in Brief
EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS M.T. Van Koevering1, DR Gi112,F.N. Owens2, H.G. Dolezal3 and C.A. Strasia4 Story in Brief Two hundred and fifty-six (256) crossbred
More informationWeight and Grade of Calf at Weaning as a Criterion for Selection of the Female Beef Breeding Herd
Weight and Grade of Calf at Weaning as a Criterion for Selection of the Female Beef Breeding Herd L. G. W ILLIAMS* AND W. J. B. M URPHY Summary The weight and grade of a calf at weaning can be used to
More informationGoal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction
Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction Mark Johnson Inheritance of Quantitative Traits P = G + E Phenotype = Genotype + Environment Genotype Additive due to individual genes Non-additive due to combinations
More informationUsing EPDs in a Commercial Herd
Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd R. R. Schalles and K. O. Zoellner Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University Manhattan, KS 66506 Today, beef cattle producers have the best tools
More informationThe Professional Animal Feeding Scientist Cull Cows 19 (2003):
The Professional Animal Feeding Scientist Cull Cows 19 (2003):233 238 233 E ffects of Body Condition, Initial Weight, and Implant on Feedlot and Carcass Characteristics of Cull Cows 1 R. N. FUNSTON*,2,
More informationImpacts of Crossbreeding on Profitability in Vertically Coordinated Beef Industry Marketing Systems
B Impacts of Crossbreeding on Profitability in Vertically Coordinated Beef Industry Marketing Systems *Preliminary Report Year 1 David A. Daley and Sean P. Earley California State University, Chico College
More informationAnimal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04
Cattle growth, breeds and breeding Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04 Growth curves 500 400 Body wt, kg 300 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age, months Allometric
More informationAnimal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04
Cattle growth, breeds and breeding Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04 Growth curves 500 400 Body wt, kg 300 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age, months 1 Allometric
More informationAnimal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04
Growth curves Cattle growth, breeds and breeding Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 04 Body wt, kg 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age, months Allometric
More informationAnimal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:
E-187 01/09 Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II: Genetic-Environmental Interaction Stephen P. Hammack* Animal response or performance is determined by two factors genetics and environment.
More informationBeef calf weights at 100 days and 205 days as indicators of dams' producing ability
Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1964 Beef calf weights at 100 days and 205 days as indicators of dams' producing ability Kenneth Joe Drewry Iowa State University Follow this and additional works
More informationHeifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1
Heifer Management by Brian Freking 2000 Beef Progress Report-1 Heifer Management Topics Introduction Heifer Selection Heifer Nutrition Early Puberty Target Weight Concept Proper Feeding Breeding of Heifers
More informationSection 5: Production Management
Introduction Lessons included the Production Management section of the elearning tool: Lesson 1: Market Steer Management...94 Lesson 2: Herd Sire Management...96 Lesson 3: Cow & Heifer Management...98
More informationResidual intake and body weight gain: A new measure of efficiency in growing cattle
Published January 20, 2015 Residual intake and body weight gain: A new measure of efficiency in growing cattle D. P. Berry* 1 and J. J. Crowley *Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc,
More information1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires For Use in U.S. Beef Production Systems,2 M. D. MacNeil 3 USDA Agricultural Research Service Miles City, Montana 5930 USA ABSTRACT Breeding objectives facilitate
More informationBREED AND HETEROSIS EFFECTS OF AMERICAN ZEBU CATTLE 1,2
BREED AND HETEROSIS EFFECTS OF AMERICAN EBU CATTLE 1,2 Summary The Brahman (American ebu) has been evaluated in numerous crossbreeding studies throughout the Southern United States. Brahman females producing
More informationMILK PRODUCTION IN HEREFORD COWS
MILK PRODUCTION IN HEREFORD COWS I. MEANS AND CORRELATIONS 1.2 O.W. Robison, M.K.M. Yusuff 3 and E.U. Dillard North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607 SUMMARY Milk production in Hereford cows was
More informationValue of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn
AS 653 ASL R2184 2007 Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn Allen H. Trenkle Iowa State University Recommended Citation Trenkle, Allen H. (2007) "Value of Modified Wet Distillers
More informationWHETHER dealing with a commercial
Selecting, Producing, and Marketing Beef Cattle WHETHER dealing with a commercial cow-calf, purebred cow-calf, or feedlot operation, a beef producer needs to be capable of analyzing and selecting high-quality
More informationPerformance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves
Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves M.D. Hudson, S.J. Winterholler, C.J. Richards, C.R. Krehbiel and D.L. Lalman Story in Brief In a two-year study,
More informationBreeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G
Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G Introduction A well-defined breeding objective provides commercial producers a mechanism for extracting value from
More informationBEEF BEEF AND DAIRY BEEF FEMALES MATED TO ANGUS AND CHAROLAIS SIRES. II. CALF GROWTH, WEANING RATE AND COW PRODUCTIVITY 1'2
BEEF BEEF AND DAIRY BEEF FEMALES MATED TO ANGUS AND CHAROLAIS SIRES. II. CALF GROWTH, WEANING RATE AND COW PRODUCTIVITY 1'2 L. A. Nelson, G. D. Beavers and T. S. Stewart Purdue University, West Lafayette,
More informationAdditive Genetic Parameters for Postweaning Growth, Feed Intake, and Ultrasound Traits in Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle
Additive Genetic Parameters for Postweaning Growth, Feed Intake, and Ultrasound Traits in Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle M. A. Elzo 1, D. D. Johnson 1, G. C. Lamb 2, T. D. Maddock 2, R. O. Myer 2, D.
More informationEFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS
EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS Oregon State University/Beef Industry Tour Corvallis, Oregon Thursday, October 25, 2018 Overview Introduction/importance of sire selection Selection
More informationJesse D. Savell University of Florida
EFFECT OF PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERISTICS AND PRECONDITIONING GAIN ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF BEEF CATTLE Jesse D. Savell University of Florida Introduction Preconditioning Prepare
More informationAn evaluation of the USDA standards for feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness
An evaluation of the USDA standards for feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness A. D. Grona, J. D. Tatum 1, K. E. Belk, G. C. Smith, and F. L. Williams 2 Colorado State University, Department of
More informationA Comparison of Milk Production In
the medium level or an additional 15 pounds of milk to produce an additional pound of weaning weight. Milk production levels of cows of both breeds were similar and low during August when forage intake
More informationBeef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast
Beef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast J. W. Turner Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University The importance of the brood cow to efficient beef production is often overlooked
More informationMatching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment
Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment Don D. Hargrove Animal Science Department University of Florida The goal in planning a management program for a commercial cow-calf operation is to maximize
More informationProceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY. Introduction
Proceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY J. T. Mulliniks, M. Benell, and R. N. Funston University of Nebraska West Central Research
More informationEffect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics
Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics L.J. McBeth, M.L. Looper, C.R. Krehbiel, D.L. Step, and R.L. Ball Story In Brief
More informationme Factors Affecting Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University Corvallis
TECHNICAL BULLETIN 102 DECEMBER 1967 So me Factors Affecting Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University Corvallis CONTENTS Introduction 3 Literature Review 4
More informationRelationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues
Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues Dr. Matt Hersom Extension Beef Cattle Specialist University of Florida - Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal
More informationHow Much Progress Can Be Made Selecting For Palatability Traits?
How Much Progress Can Be Made Selecting For Palatability Traits? T.A. Olson, D.D. Johnson, and R.L. West Department of Animal Sciences University of Florida Gainesville, Florida Introduction Beef palatability
More informationCrossbreeding in Beef Cattle
W 471 Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle F. David Kirkpatrick, Professor Department of Animal Science Improving the productivity and efficiency of a commercial beef production operation through genetic methods
More informationComparative Feeding Value of Dried Citrus Pulp, Corn Feed Meal and Ground Snapped Corn for Fattening Steers in Drylot 1
BUL616 Comparative Feeding Value of Dried Citrus Pulp, Corn Feed Meal and Snapped Corn for Fattening Steers in Drylot 1 Fentress M. Peacock and W. G. Kirk 2 The value of any fattening feed for beef cattle
More informationPerformance Testing Bulls on the Farm
Agriculture and Natural Resources Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm FSA3027 Brett Barham Associate Professor Animal Science Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: http://www.uaex.edu Importance
More informationRelationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues
Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues Dr. Matt Hersom 1 1 Assistant Professor, UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences, Gainesville, FL Introduction Proper nutritional status
More informationBeef Bulls. Performance of Progeny. High and Low Per forming. Sired by JAN U N IV ERSI T Y STATION EXPERIMENT AGRICULTU RAL A U BUR N
AUGUST 1971 Performance of Progeny Sired by JAN2 71 97 2 High and Low Per forming Beef Bulls AGRICULTU RAL A U BUR N E. V. Smith, Director EXPERIMENT STATION U N IV ERSI T Y Auburn, Alaoor CONTENTS Page
More informationPost-Weaning Nutritional Management Affects Feedlot Performance, 12 th Rib Fat, and Marbling Deposition of Angus and Wagyu Heifers
Post-Weaning Nutritional Management Affects Feedlot Performance, 12 th Rib Fat, and Marbling Deposition of Angus and Wagyu Heifers A. E. Wertz 1, L. L. Berger 1, D.B. Faulkner 1, F. K. McKeith 1, S. Rodriguez-Zas
More informationGenetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 1. Carcass lean percentage 1,2
Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 1. Carcass lean percentage 1,2 R. Bergen,* S. P. Miller,* 3 J. W. Wilton,* D. H. Crews
More informationThe Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production
The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production Special Report 584 May 1980 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis ABSTRACT As the margin of profit in the beef cattle industry
More informationGENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska
GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE Matt Spangler University of Nebraska GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD Spangler s interpretation Qualifications Fertile at a young age Short post-partum
More informationControlling the Cost of Beef Production through Improving Feed Efficiency
Controlling the Cost of Beef Production through Improving Feed Efficiency Rod Hill 1 *, Cassie M. Welch 1, J.D. Wulfhorst 2, Stephanie Kane 2 Larry D. Keenan 3 and Jason K. Ahola 4 1 Department of Animal
More informationA COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson
A COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson Artificial insemination has been promoted for a number of years as being one management tool available
More informationBeef Bull Development
Beef Bull Development Developing beef bulls can be both challenging and rewarding. Sale of breeding-age bulls is often a significant source of revenue for seedstock producers. A comprehensive bull development
More informationUNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER)
UNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER) 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION (HIGH CONCENTRATE) Production of young bulls from the suckler herd which are slaughtered before they reach 16 months of age. These young bulls are
More informationThe economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E.
The economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E. Goddard 3 1 Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and
More informationUnderstanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech
publication 400-804 Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech Expected progeny differences (EPDs) provide estimates of the genetic value
More informationNet feed efficiency and its Relationship to Carcass Quality of Fed Cattle, and Wintering Ability of Cows
Net feed efficiency and its Relationship to Carcass Quality of Fed Cattle, and Wintering Ability of Cows J.A. Basarab, P.Ag., Ph.D. New Technologies to Improve Feed Efficiency, Disease Detection and Traceability
More informationREPRODUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT
REPRODUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT D.S. Buchanan 1, R. Gosz 2, E. Nesamvuni 2 and L. Knori 3 Story in Brief Reproductive
More informationCanadian Hereford Association
Canadian Hereford Association Pan American Hereford Cattle Evaluation Fall 2017 EPD Averages, Tools and Trends Includes: Introduction to Genomically Enhanced EPD Post-Weaning Gain EPD Residual Feed Intake
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING
CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING D. M. ~arshall', M. D. onf fore? and C. A. ~inke? Department of Animal
More informationHETEROSIS AND ADDITIVE BREED EFFECTS ON FEEDLOT AND CARCASS TRAITS FROM CROSSING ANGUS AND BROWN SWISS
HETEROSIS AND ADDITIVE BREED EFFECTS ON FEEDLOT AND CARCASS TRAITS FROM CROSSING ANGUS AND BROWN SWISS By TIMOTHY THAD MARSHALL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
More informationINVESTIGATION INTO GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR FEEDLOT TRAITS OF TWO CATTLE BREEDS IN SOUTH AFRICA
INVESTIGATION INTO GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR FEEDLOT TRAITS OF TWO CATTLE BREEDS IN SOUTH AFRICA J. Hendriks,2, M.M. Scholtz,2, J.B. van Wyk 2 & F.W.C Neser 2 ARC-Animal Production Institute, Private Bag
More informationREVIEW: Preweaning, Postweaning, and Carcass Trait Comparisons for Progeny Sired by Subtropically Adapted Beef Sire Breeds at Various US Locations
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln,
More informationComparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves
Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves C. G. Chenette, R. R. Frahm, A. B. Cobb and J. Eason Story in Brief Feedlot performance and carcass traits were
More informationImproving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee
Section 4 23 by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee Introduction Carefully identifying better animals and breeding them with other superior animals will gradually improve the genetics of a herd. Enhanced genetics
More informationBREEDING BETTER BEEF. 1. PREWEANING PERFORMANCE OF CALYES SIRED BY ANGUS, HEREFORD, AND CHAROLAIS BULLS
630 US ISSN 0271-9916 May 1983 RESEARCH EXTENSION SERIES 030 BREEDING BETTER BEEF. 1. PREWEANING PERFORMANCE OF CALYES SIRED BY ANGUS, HEREFORD, AND CHAROLAIS BULLS D. Reimer,J. C. Nolan,Jr., and C. M.
More informationThe Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business
Tri-State Beef Conference The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business By Tom Brink JBS Five Rivers Cattle Feeding, LLC Owned since October 2008 by JBS USA Twelve feedyards in seven states and Alberta,
More informationEffects of Artificial Insemination and Natural Service Breeding Systems on Steer Progeny Backgrounding Performance
Effects of Artificial Insemination and Natural Service Breeding Systems on Steer Progeny Backgrounding Performance P.L. Steichen 1, M.R. Schook 1, C.S. Schauer 2, B.W. Neville 3 and C.R. Dahlen 1 1 Department
More informationBLUP and Genomic Selection
BLUP and Genomic Selection Alison Van Eenennaam Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and Genomics University of California, Davis, USA alvaneenennaam@ucdavis.edu http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/animalbiotech/
More informationEffective Use Of EPDs. Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist
Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist February 10-11, 2016 2 Background EPDs have been available for more than 30 years. The use of
More informationHow to select, grow, and manage replacement heifers W.A. Zollinger and J.B. Carr
EC 951 Reprinted May 1993 How to select, grow, and manage replacement heifers W.A. Zollinger and J.B. Carr $1.00 Replacement heifer production covers a major portion of the budget of most beef operations.
More informationGenetic Parameters and Their Use in Swine Breeding
Genetic Parameters and Their Use in Swine Breeding Originally published as a National Swine Improvement Federation Factsheet. Introduction Authors Authors: Joe Cassady, North Carolina State University,
More informationHeterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers
Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers D. G. Riley 1, C. C. Chase, Jr. 1, S. W. Coleman 1, W. A. Phillips 2, M. F. Miller 3, J. C. Brooks 3, D. D. Johnson
More informationof Nebraska - Lincoln
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science Animal Science Department February 2004 Genetic response to selection
More information2013 TJSSA State Futurity Junior Cattleman s Quiz
2013 TJSSA State Futurity Junior Cattleman s Quiz 1. What institution is home to the world s largest cattle genetic evaluation? a. American Angus Association b. Breed Plan Australia c. American Simmental
More informationREALISED RESPONSES TO DIVERGENT SELECTION FOR YEARLING GROWTH RATE IN ANGUS CATTLE
REALISED RESPONSES TO DIVERGENT SELECTION FOR YEARLING GROWTH RATE IN ANGUS CATTLE P.F. PARNELL1, R. BARLOW2, and B. TIER3, AUSTRALIA 1 Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW, 2 Agricultural Research
More informationThe genomics avalanche Let s visit the past
Improving EPD accuracy by combining EPD information with DNA test results Alison Van Eenennaam Animal breeders use the resemblance between relatives to select parents of the next generation and make genetic
More informationUsing Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection
Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection In some instances, value-based marketing systems can be economically advantageous to cattle producers. Monetary rewards are sometimes
More information