Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato
|
|
- Curtis Smith
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler Interpretative Summary The effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and different potash fertilizers on diseases, growth, and yield of no-till and conventional tillage staked tomatoes were evaluated in a factorial experiment. Eight different tillage-pgpr-potash combinations were included in the study. In this fifth year of the continuous no-till system, no-till tomato production led to slower plant growth and lower yields than the conventional tillage system. Use of sulfate of potash instead of muriate of potash increased plant growth early in the season, but led to an increase in the incidence of Sclerotinia stem rot. Yields of extra-large tomatoes were increased with sulfate of potash while yields of medium and large tomatoes were decreased. Use of PGPR increased the growth of transplanted tomatoes. Early yields were also increased with PGPR without affecting total yields. Introduction West Tennessee silt loam soils are some of the most highly erosive soils in the United States. No-till production of West Tennessee row crops has increased significantly in recent years as growers have learned the advantages of this production system and as UT researchers have developed the management techniques needed for successful notill production of cotton, corn, and soybeans. Advantages include decreased soil erosion, improved soil structure, increased water infiltration, and more timely access to fields for applying pest management sprays or for conducting planting and harvesting operations. Some of these advantages, e.g. improved soil structure and water infiltration, are not fully realized until no-till production systems have been continuously used for several years. Most research on no-till production of vegetable crops has not been of a continuous nature. Fields are tilled in the fall to plant a winter cover crop, such as wheat or hairy vetch. The cover crop is killed the following spring with herbicides, then vegetable crops are planted using no-till production techniques. At the end of the growing season, however, the field is again tilled and seeded with another winter cover crop. The research reported here seeks to evaluate the effects of a continuous no-till production system on diseases, growth, and yield of staked tomato. Effects of other management decisions, such as fertilizer choice, are incorporated into the study. Their specific location within the test changes each year. Materials and Methods
2 Site description. The soil in the test field was a Calloway-Henry silt loam complex, 0-2% slope with 1% O.M., high soil test levels of available P, and moderate to high soil test levels of available K. The soil contained over 1280 lb Ca/acre, over 64 lb Mg/acre, and approximately 5 lb Zn/acre. Soil ph in plots ranged from 6.0 to 7.0 with a mean ph of 6.6 (fall 2000 soil tests). Pelletized Dolomitic Limestone with a Tennessee Relative Neutralizing Value (RNV) of 98.2 was hand-broadcast Feb 4, 2001, as needed over each 5 x 50 ft. plot at rates recommended by the fall 2000 soil tests. Experimental design. The 2001 test was a factorial experiment with three factors: (1) tillage (i.e., no-till vs conventional tillage), (2) use of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (hereafter referred to as PGPR) (i.e., use of BioYield vs none), and (3) potash source (i.e., muriate vs sulfate). Each of the eight possible combinations of these factors was replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Tillage. The no-till plots had not been tilled since the fall of 1996 when they were seeded with Kentucky 31 tall fescue, while conventional tillage plots were tilled annually. In the 2001 test, a 'middle-buster' was used to simulate the use of a chisel plow in the latter plots. On April 9, the middle-buster with a single center shank was pulled down the middle of each conventional tillage plot, cutting a furrow 7 in. deep and 45 ft. long. The center shank was then removed and the remaining two shanks mounted on the toolbar 32 in. apart (16 in. on either side of the former center shank). The middle-buster was then pulled through the plots a second time with this new configuration, creating a ridge down the center of the plot and cutting two new furrows 5-6 inches deep on either side of the ridge. Hand rakes were used to pull soil tossed outside the conventional tillage plots by the second pass with the middle-buster back into the plots (i.e., off the undisturbed grass beside the plots). A small disk was run over the plots (twice) on April 10 to cut-up large soil clods and to reduce the height of the ridge. After all operations were complete, the plots appeared as a tilled strip, 6 ½ ft. wide, with a low ridge, 2-3 in. high, down the center of the each plot. Fertilizers. The first application of nitrogen to both no-till and conventional tillage plots was on Apr 11, 3 ½ weeks before setting transplants, at 15 lb N/4356 row-ft as a broadcast strip down the center of each plot. Nitrogen was applied after setting transplants six additional times (May 8 and 18; June 5, 13, 21, and 27) to all plots as sidedressings at 15 lb N/4356 row-ft per application. All plots were fertilized twice with potash at 30 lb K 2 O/4356 row-ft per application, once 3 ½ weeks before setting transplants and again as a sidedressing one month after transplanting. Transplants. Greenhouse-grown Mountain Fresh F1' tomato transplants were used for all treatments in Tomatoes not receiving PGPR were seeded in 72-cell Speedling trays filled with Pro-Mix BX on March 14. Tomatoes that received treatment with PGPR were seeded in 72-cell Speedling trays on March 26. The latter trays were filled with Pro-Mix BX to which PGPR had been added. PGPR were incorporated into the potting mix by mixing one liter of BioYield with 39 liters of dry Pro-Mix BX to achieve a ratio of 1
3 part BioYield to 40 parts treated mix. [BioYield contains two difference species of bacteria that are purported to promote plant growth and yield.] Other Cultural practices. Herbicides, supplemented with occasional mowing or handhoeing, were used for weed control. Roundup-Ultra at 1.5 quart/acre (2.0% solution) was applied down the center of no-till plots on March 15 in a 30-inch-wide band. Roundup-Ultra (2.0% solution) was applied to both no-till plots (30-inch-wide band) and conventional tillage plots (84-inch-wide) on April 5. A final application of Roundup-Ultra (2.0% solution) on May 3 was applied to both conventional and no-till plots one day before setting transplants to kill emerging yellow nutsedge. The test was planted on the morning of May 4 using a modified mechanical transplanter (18 transplants/row). Plants were suckered once. Plots were irrigated as needed to avoid moisture stress and to help dissolve sidedressed fertilizers using a drip irrigation system consisting of 0.5 gallon/hr emitters spaced every two feet along side tomato rows. Plants were tied to stakes using a modified Florida weave. Poast at 1.5 pint/acre was applied as a directed spray on each side of rows on June 8 to both no-till plots (18-inch-wide bands) and conventional tillage plots (18-inch-wide bands). Sencor 75 DF at 1.25 lb/acre was applied as a directed spray on each side of the rows on June 12 (15-inch-wide bands, no-till rows; 42-inch-wide bands, conventional tillage rows). Fungicides were applied four times using a hydraulic sprayer: three applications of Quadris 2.08 SC at fl oz/acre/application (on May 25, June 18, and July 24) plus one application of Bravo WeatherStik at 1.3 quart/acre (on June 29). Insecticides were applied five times: SpinTor 2SC at 5.8 fl oz/a on May 25 and Asana XL at fl oz/acre on June 18, June 29, July 24, and July 30. All fungicide and insecticide sprays were applied at 300 psi using a hydraulic sprayer equipped with one to four (depending on plant height) ceramic, hollow-cone drop nozzles on each side of rows. Data collection. The heights of all plants were recorded May 19 and June 22. Plots were checked every 1-2 weeks for the presence of any diseases, and disease incidence or severity ratings were collected as appropriate. Tomatoes were picked 2-3 times/week from July 6 through August 7 at the 'breaker-stage' of maturity (10 harvests). A final (11th) harvest of all green tomatoes of marketable size remaining on plants was made on August 7-8. Harvested tomatoes of marketable quality were graded by size into four categories: small (7 x 7 boxes), medium (6 x 7 boxes), large (5 x 6 boxes), and extra-large (4 x 5 boxes). Yields (boxes/acre) in the following tables are based on 3600 plants/acre. Small tomatoes were considered unmarketable and are not included in yield tables. All disease, growth, and yield data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for a factorial experiment with a randomized complete block (RCB) design. Results and Discussion
4 There was no difference in the mean heights of tomato transplants grown with or without BioYield; transplants with either treatment averaged 5.3 in. tall when set. Mean plant height by June 6 was significantly greater with use of BioYield than without BioYield (Table 1). Use of sulfate of potash instead of muriate of potash also increased mean plant height (Table 1). In contrast, mean plant height was significantly decreased with no-till compared to conventional tillage (Table 1). The growth advantage with BioYield was still apparent two weeks later but not the benefits with sulfate of potash. The 2001 test was the second time in the five-year study in which significant disease losses were noted early in the growing season. Three tomato diseases were observed on the West Tennessee Experiment Station during the spring and early summer. An outbreak of Sclerotinia stem rot (white mold) appeared in early May and eventually killed many plants. Disease losses were significantly greater in plots receiving sulfate of potash than with muriate of potash (Table 2). Southern blight and tomato spotted wilt virus appeared in late May and killed or stunted an occasional plant throughout the remainder of the season. No treatment factors significantly affected the incidence of the latter two diseases (Table 2). Total marketable yields were significantly higher with conventional tillage than with notill (Table 3). This was largely due to a significant increase in the number of extra-large tomatoes. Sulfate of potash also significantly increased the number of extra-large tomatoes, with concomitant decreases in the number of medium and large tomatoes (Table 3). Total marketable yields were not significantly affected by potash treatment despite the significant differences in plant loss to Sclerotinia stem rot with sulfate of potash. Use of PGPR (BioYield) significantly increased early yields (first six harvests) of marketable tomatoes (Table 4). The highest yield during this period was with conventional tillage combined with use of muriate of potash and BioYield (Table 5). Highest marketable yield for all 11 harvests was with this same combination, though it did not differ significantly from other seven combination treatments (Table 5). Severe yield losses due to insect damage were incurred during the middle of July as corn ear worms moved from a nearby sweet corn test to the tomatoes. When the total weight of fruit produced per plot (including culls and small tomatoes) was examined, yields with use of BioYield were consistently higher than those without BioYield for the first ten harvests, although not always at the 0.05 probability level (Table 6). The potential for BioYield to increase yields of marketable tomatoes, particularly early yields, needs to be verified with additional tests. The trends in the 2001 test at Jackson appear promising. Table 1. Effects and interactions of tillage method, PGPR use, and potash source on plant height and flowering of staked tomato, Jackson, TN, 2001.
5 Mean plant growth Mean plant height (in.) June 6 and June Factors (in.) June 6 June Tillage method* conventional 17.3 a 26.8 a 9.5 no-till 16.4 b 25.4 b 9.0 PGPR use* none 16.3 b 25.4 b 9.1 BioYield 17.4 a 26.9 a 9.5 Potash source* muriate (KCl) 16.5 b sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ) 17.2 a Results of ANOVA (Probability > F) tillage PGPR tillage X PGPR potash (K 2 O) tillage X potash PGPR X potash tillage X N X K 2 O
6 replication *Values are the means of 16 different plots. Significant differences within a factor are indicated by the use of different letters following the means (P = 0.05). Table 2. Effects and interactions of tillage method, PGPR use, and potash source on plant losses to diseases of staked tomato, Jackson, TN, Factors Total plant losses by Aug 9 (%) Sources of disease losses (% plants) Sclerotinia stem rot Tillage method* tomato spotted wilt virus southern blight nventional o-till PGPR use one oyield Potash source uriate (KCl) 9 b 7 b lfate (K 2 SO 4 ) 20 a 15 a Results of ANOVA (Probability > F) lage GPR
7 tillage X PGPR potash (K 2 O) tillage X potash PGPR X potash tillage X N X K 2 O replication *Values are the means of 16 different plots. Significant differences within a factor are indicated by the use of different letters following the means (P = 0.05). Table 3. Effects and interactions of tillage method, PGPR use, and potash source on marketable yields of staked tomato, July 6 - August 8 (11 harvests), Jackson, TN, Number 20 lb boxes per acre Factors 6 X 7 5 X 6 4 X 5 Total Tillage method* nventional a 1449 a o-till b 1254 b PGPR use* one oyield Potash source* uriate (KCl) 206 a 483 a 651 b 1339
8 sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ) 151 b 411 b 802 a 1364 Results of ANOVA (Probability > F) tillage PGPR tillage X PGPR potash (K 2 O) tillage X potash PGPR X potash tillage X N X K 2 O replication *Values are the means of 16 different plots. Significant differences within a factor are indicated by the use of different letters following the means (P = 0.05). Table 4. Effects and interactions of tillage method, PGPR use, and potash source on marketable yields of staked tomato, first six harvest in July, Jackson, TN, Number 20 lb boxes per acre Factors 6 X 7 5 X 6 4 X 5 Total Tillage method* nventional a 335 a 502 a o-till b 193 b 342 b PGPR use*
9 none 28 b b BioYield 42 a a Potash source* muriate (KCl) a sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ) b Results of ANOVA (Probability > F) tillage PGPR tillage X PGPR potash (K 2 O) tillage X potash PGPR X potash tillage X N X K 2 O replication *Values are the means of 16 different plots. Significant differences within a factor are indicated by the use of different letters following the means (P = 0.05). Table 5. Effects of different tillage method, PGPR use, and potash source treatment combinations on marketable yields of staked tomato, first six harvests in July, Jackson, TN, Factor combinations Number 20 lb boxes per acre* First 6 harvests All 11 harvests
10 Tillage PGPR use Potash 4 X 5 Total 4 X 5 Total conventional none muriate 309 b 496 ab 685 ab 1349 conventional none sulfate 266 bc 405 bc 834 a 1378 conventional BioYield muriate 422 a 607 a 888 a 1566 conventional BioYield sulfate 344 ab 501 ab 917 a 1502 no-till none muriate 137 d 253 d 511 b 1176 no-till none sulfate 266 bc 398 bc 757 a 1327 no-till BioYield muriate 177 cd 369 bcd 518 b 1265 no-till BioYield sulfate 194 cd 346 cd 701 ab 1250 Results of ANOVA (Probability >F) *Values are the means of four plots. Means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Fisher s (protected) LSD (P = 0.05). Table 6. Effects of BioYield on tomato yields, Jackson, TN, summer by harvest date. Harvest date (mo/day) Marketable 20 lb boxes/acre 1 2 Total weight/plot (lb) Mean weight per healthy plant 3 (lb) no PGPR 4 BioYield no PGPR BioYield no PGPR BioYield 7/ / / * * * 7/ * * *
11 7/ / / / / / /07-08 # 129* * Totals Yields of marketable medium, large, and extra-large tomatoes harvested at the "breaker-stage". Values are means of 16 one-row plots each planted with 18 Mountain Fresh F1 tomatoes transplants on May 5, Includes marketable tomatoes plus small tomatoes and culls. Yields are NOT corrected for the number of plants lost in each plot due to disease, etc. 3 Includes marketable tomatoes plus small tomatoes and culls per healthy plant at each harvest. These yields ARE CORRECTED for plant losses due to disease, etc. 4 no PGPR = no plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used. *Indicates a significant difference between tomatoes with and without BioYield for that harvest. # Includes all medium-size or larger fruit remaining after the tenth harvest (on 8/07). Copyright 1999 by The University of Tennessee. All rights reserved. This research represents one season's data and does not constitute recommendations. After sufficient data is collected over the appropriate number of seasons, final recommendations will be made through research and extension publications.
Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler. Interpretative Summary
Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato, West Tennessee Experiment Station, 2000 Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler
More informationEvaluation of Tomato Varieties with TSWV Resistance. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt. Interpretative Summary. Introduction
Evaluation of Tomato Varieties with TSWV Resistance Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt Interpretative Summary Tomato varieties BHN 444 and BHN 555 with reported resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (SWV)
More informationSnapbean and Sweet Corn Response to N Rate and Furrow-Placed Growplex Humate George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Snapbean and Sweet Corn Response to N Rate and Furrow-Placed Growplex Humate 97-21 George J. Hochmuth
More informationEffect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia
Objective: Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia To quantify the affect of percent crop stand
More information' S. Mississippi Branch Expt. Sta.. Poplarville, MS. Mississippi State Univ. ' Brown Loam Branch Expt. Sta.. Raymond. MS.
TILLAGE SYSTEMS FOR COTTON PRODUCTION ON LOESS SOILS IN CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI David M. Ingram 1 and N. C. Edwards. Jr. 2 INTRODUCTION The Brown Loam soil resource area of Mississippi is a narrow band (about
More informationEffect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley
Objective: Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components Shawn P. Conley To quantify the affect of percent crop stand loss and spring nitrogen rate on soft red winter wheat yield.
More informationPREVIOUS YEAR MID-SUMMER SOIL INCORPORATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND EPTAM TO CONTROL YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN ONION THE FOLLOWING YEAR
PREVIOUS YEAR MID-SUMMER SOIL INCORPORATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND EPTAM TO CONTROL YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN ONION THE FOLLOWING YEAR Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University,
More informationHERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET
HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2012 Introduction
More informationEvaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solution Effects on Vegetable Production in Florida George J.
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solution Effects on Vegetable Production
More informationFall Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Placement
Fall Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Placement Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of Fall Strip Tillage Systems and Fertilizer Placement on corn production in comparison to conventional and No-Tillage
More informationOverview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques
Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques David Wright, Jim Marois, Duli Zhao, and Cheryl Mackowiak IFAS-North Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida, Quincy,
More informationResponse of Tomato to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Tomato to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers 98-02 George J. Hochmuth
More informationEVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PRE-EMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
EVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PRE-EMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL Joel Felix, Kevin V. Osborne, and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
More informationResponse of Pepper to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Pepper to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers 98-01 George J. Hochmuth
More informationEvaluation of Herbicides for Greens Crops, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins and Angela Harrison. Interpretative Summary
Evaluation of Herbicides for Greens Crops, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins and Angela Harrison Interpretative Summary Azafenidin at the rate of 0.25 lb ai/a, although lower rates could
More informationSuccess With Cover Crops
Success With Cover Crops Contributing Authors: Dr. Dewey Lee, University of Georgia Ms. Julia Gaskin, University of Georgia Dr. Harry Schomberg, Agricultural Research Service Dr. Gary Hawkins, University
More informationPOTENTIAL PHYTOTOXICITY OF RIMON ON LEAFY GREENS
POTENTIAL PHYTOTOXICITY OF RIMON ON LEAFY GREENS Alton N. Sparks, Jr. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Department of Entomology Tifton, Georgia 31793 asparks@uga.edu Introduction Rimon (novaluron,
More informationDEVELOPING EFFECTIVE CROP ROTATION SYSTEMS TO MANAGE YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN THE TREASURE VALLEY
DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE CROP ROTATION SYSTEMS TO MANAGE YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN THE TREASURE VALLEY Joel Felix and Joey Ishida Maiheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2008 Introduction
More informationINSECTICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SUGAR BEETS FOR CROWN BORER CONTROL
INSECTICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SUGAR BEETS FOR CROWN BORER CONTROL Charles E. Stanger and Joey Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon, 1995 Introduction The sugar beet crown
More informationPumpkin Fungicide and Cultivar Evaluation, 2017
Pumpkin Fungicide and Cultivar Evaluation, 2017 John Strang, John Walsh, Chris Smigell, and John Snyder Department of Horticulture, N-318 Ag Science Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
More informationEVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.
EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO Formatted Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009 Introduction A field study was conducted in 2009 at the Malheur
More informationPA Vegetable Marketing and Research Program PA Vegetable Growers Association Final Report 2013
PA Vegetable Marketing and Research Program PA Vegetable Growers Association Final Report 2013 Project Title: Optimizing management of cucumber downy mildew to currently used fungicides and production
More informationCONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS FOR ONIONS IN THE TREASURE VALLEY
CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS FOR ONIONS IN THE TREASURE VALLEY Lynn Jensen Malheur County Extension Office Lamont Sanders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2000 Abstract
More informationFertilizer Placement Options Demonstration
Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration -- UNL South Central Agricultural Laboratory -- Final Report, Jan. 21 Glen P. Slater Richard B. Ferguson Rationale Nebraska corn producers continually strive
More informationWeed Control in No-Till Pumpkins
Weed Control in No-Till Pumpkins Elizabeth T. Maynard, Purdue University, Westville, Indiana 46391 Introduction No-till production systems for pumpkins are of interest to Midwest producers, but achieving
More informationStrip Till Systems for Burley Tobacco in Tennessee
Strip Till Systems for Burley Tobacco in Tennessee Paul Denton University of Tennessee Objective Evaluate alternative strip till systems for burley tobacco production in Tennessee Compare these systems
More informationWISCONSIN CORN AND SOYBEAN RESPONSES TO FERTILIZER PLACEMENT IN CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS 1/ Richard P. Wolkowski 2/
WISCONSIN CORN AND SOYBEAN RESPONSES TO FERTILIZER PLACEMENT IN CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS 1/ Richard P. Wolkowski 2/ There continues to be considerable interest in P and K fertilizer placement among
More informationTIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources
PLANT PATHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources June 21, 2011 PP-702 Corn Fungicide Screening Summary and Updated Fungicide List for 2011 A. K. Hagan Professor and Extension Plant
More informationEvaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle
Evaluating Corn and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle Brent Bean and Thomas Gerik 1 Research Technicians: Roger Cassens, Tommy Proffitt, Matt Rowland CEAs: Dennis Newton, Robert Harris, Sam Nusz Summary
More informationFresh Market and Saladette Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in Southwest Michigan, 2017
Fresh Market and Saladette Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in Southwest Michigan, 2017 Dr. Ron Goldy and Kyle Ferrantella, Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center, 1791 Hillandale Road, Benton Harbor,
More informationConducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol
Site Description Arise Research & Discovery, Inc. Evaluation of WakeUP2 and SEA-90 on Early Development of Tillage Radishes and Oats for Fall Cover Crops Trial ID: 12-RF0112-12 Study Dir.: Jerry Carlson
More informationFoliar Fungicide Study Block 5S Beaumont, TX 2009
North Foliar Fungicide Study Block 5S Beaumont, TX 2009 Young-Ki Jo, X. Mao, M.O. Way, Don Groth and Piper Roberts PLOT PLAN I II III IV 1 14 19 11 37 10 55 13 2 10 20 9 38 7 56 11 3 16 21 2 39 12 57 5
More informationCover Cropping and Strip Tillage to Improve Crop Performance and Food Safety in Muskmelon Production
Cover Cropping and Strip Tillage to Improve Crop Performance and Food Safety in Muskmelon Production RFR-A1213 Ajay Nair, assistant professor Angela Shaw, assistant professor Department of Horticulture
More informationNO-TILL PUMPKIN PRODUCTION
NO-TILL PUMPKIN PRODUCTION Ryan Harrelson 1, Anthony Cole 1, Greg Hoyt 1*, John Havlin 1, and David Monks 2 1 Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7619, Raleigh, North Carolina
More informationEvaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean
Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean Terry A. DeVries, University of Nebraska, South Central Ag Laboratory, Clay Center, NE 68933 Robert J. Wright, Dept. Of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
More informationTYLCV-resistant Tomato Cultivar Trial and Whitefly Control Strategies
TYLCV-resistant Tomato Cultivar Trial and Whitefly Control Strategies Kent Cushman Vegetable Specialist and Assistant Professor UF/IFAS, Southwest Florida Research & Education Center, Immokalee kcushman@ufl.edu
More informationCrop Management and Cropping Systems
27 Crop Management and Cropping Systems Joe Touchton and Ken Wells Auburn University and the University of Kentucky No-till research has been conducted sporadically in the Southeast for many years. Intensive
More informationKNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers
A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers KNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers To maximize profit when growing peanuts, farmers rely on recommendations for variety selection,
More informationEVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PREEMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
EVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PREEMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL Joel Felix, Kevin V. Osborne, and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
More informationVolunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat Mark Thorne, Drew Lyon and Tim Waters
Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat Mark Thorne, Drew Lyon and Tim Waters Buckwheat seed contamination in wheat is a concern for exports to Asia because it is considered an allergen risk
More informationEVALUATION OF PYROXASULFONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT- SEEDED ONION
EVALUATION OF PYROXASULFONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT- SEEDED ONION Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2011 Introduction Relatively fewer herbicides
More informationResponse of Mulched Lettuce, Cauliflower, and Tomato to Megafol Biostimulant George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Mulched Lettuce, Cauliflower, and Tomato to Megafol Biostimulant 98-08 George J. Hochmuth
More informationHEIRLOOM TOMATOES AND PROFITABILITY
Appendix A.07 HEIRLOOM TOMATOES AND PROFITABILITY William H. Tietjen, Agricultural Agent Rutgers Cooperative Extension of Warren County 165 County Route 519 S. Belvidere, NJ 07823 Peter J. Nitzsche, Agricultural
More informationBob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner
Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002 Burn Down Management of Winter Cereal Cover Crops for No-tillage Burley Tobacco Production Bob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner INTRODUCTION Recent developments
More informationINVESTIGATE SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS AND IRRIGATION CRITERIA FOR THE TREASURE VALLEY
INVESTIGATE SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS AND IRRIGATION CRITERIA FOR THE TREASURE VALLEY Joel Felix, Clinton Shock, Joey Ishida, and Erik Feibert, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario,
More informationCOMPARISON OF CALENDAR DAYS AND GROWING DEGREE-DAYS FOR SCHEDULING HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS IN SUGAR BEET
COMPARISON OF CALENDAR DAYS AND GROWING DEGREE-DAYS FOR SCHEDULING HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS IN SUGAR BEET Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University
More informationEVALUATION OF SUSTAIN ADJUVANT FOR IMPROVED HERBICIDE WEED EFFICACY IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION
EVLUTION OF SUSTIN DJUVNT FOR IMPROVED HERICIDE WEED EFFICCY IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2011 Introduction is a
More information2017 Evaluation of Soybean Varieties, Jay, Florida
2017 Evaluation of Soybean Varieties, Jay, Florida Jennifer Bearden and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 soybean replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration trial
More informationUF-IFAS Nitrogen Fertilization and Management Recommendations for Fresh Tomato Production in Florida in the BMP Era
UF-IFAS Nitrogen Fertilization and Management Recommendations for Fresh Tomato Production in Florida in the BMP Era Monica Ozores-Hampton, Eric Simonne, Eugene McAvoy, Phil Stansly, Sanjay Shukla, Pam
More informationCarinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems
Carinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems David Wright and Team Brassica carinata Summit March 30, 2017 Quincy, FL Goals for Carinata Production in a Double Cropping System (2 crops/yr) Early maturing- Harvest
More informationOnion Stunting Caused by Rhizoctonia: Management and Economic Importance in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington
Onion Stunting Caused by Rhizoctonia: Management and Economic Importance in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington Dipak Poudyal and Lindsey du Toit, Washington State University; Tim Paulitz and Lyndon
More informationGreen Manure Cover Crops Between Rows of Widely Spaced Vegetable Crops
Green Manure Cover Crops Between Rows of Widely Spaced Vegetable Crops Squash and pumpkin are grown with wide spaces between the rows. Tillage is commonly used to control the weeds between the rows but
More informationCover Crops. PFI Conference Cover Crops 101 Saturday Jan. 12, 2013 Ames, IA
Cover Crops PFI Conference Cover Crops 101 Saturday Jan. 12, 2013 Ames, IA USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment Ames, Iowa Tom Kaspar Ben Knutson Keith Kohler Kent Heikens Dan
More informationEvaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solutions for Tomato and Pepper Production in Florida George J.
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solutions for Tomato and Pepper Production
More informationResponse of Snapbean, Carrot, and Sweet Corn to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Snapbean, Carrot, and Sweet Corn to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions 97-11
More informationPowdery Mildew Resistant Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation, New York, 2010
Powdery Mildew Resistant Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation, New York, 2010 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Laura K. Hunsberger, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra Menasha,
More informationResponse of Mulched Tomato to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Mulched Tomato to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers 98-08 George J. Hochmuth 1 Materials
More informationEvaluation of FCR-resistant Tomato Varieties under Commercial Conditions in Southwest Florida Spring 2011
Evaluation of FCR-resistant Tomato Varieties under Commercial Conditions in Southwest Florida Spring 2011 Submitted by Monica Ozores-Hampton and Gene McAvoy University of Florida/SWFREC June 22, 2011 1
More informationSoybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 (301) 405-6241 Soybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems Dr. Robert Kratochvil
More informationGROWING TOMATOES WITH LESS TILLAGE
GROWING TOMATOES WITH LESS TILLAGE Jeff Mitchell University of California, Davis Since 1999, we have evaluated conservation tillage (CT) and cropping (CC) practices for tomato production in an 8 acre field
More informationEffects of Rye Cover Crop on Strip-Till Pumpkin Production in Northern Illinois
Effects of Rye Cover Crop on Strip-Till Pumpkin Production in Northern Illinois Maurice Ogutu, University of Illinois Extension, Countryside, Illinois 60525 This paper reports the evaluation of rye cover
More informationIrrigation Strategies for Water-Short Years or Efficient Water Use
Irrigation Strategies for Water-Short Years or Efficient Water Use Northern Utah Water Conference Logan, Utah April 2, 2014 Presentation by L. Niel Allen Extension Irrigation Engineer Definition of Water
More informationSoil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE
Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE www.wardlab.com Purposes of Soil Quality Employ new & modified crop management systems Increase efficiency
More informationCorn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County
Special Publication-13-02 Corn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County Stephen S. Foster, UNCE Extension Educator, Pershing County Jay Davison, UNCE Alternative Crop/Forage Specialist Introduction Alfalfa
More informationNarrow Plant Spacing. Standard Plant Spacing
Stop the Rot! Using Cultural Practices to Reduce Bacterial Bulb Decay in Onions Christine Hoepting 1, Kathryn Klotzbach 1, Judson Reid 1 and Beth Gugino 2 1 Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program
More informationESTABLISHING ALFALFA USING NO-TILL TECHNIQUES
ESTABLISHING ALFALFA USING NO-TILL TECHNIQUES Gary Bates Forage Specialist The University of Tennessee There have been many changes in agriculture over the last 50 years. One of the greatest has been the
More informationClint Shock, Jan Trenkel, Daniel Burton, Monty Saunders, and Erik Feibert Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon.
SEASON-LONG COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF POLYACRYLAMIDE AND FURROW MULCHING TO REDUCE SEDIMENT LOSS AND IMPROVE WATER INFILTRATION IN FURROW IRRIGATED ONIONS Clint Shock, Jan Trenkel, Daniel Burton, Monty
More informationSure-K Rate Effect on Corn Yield (2002) Sure-K Rate Effect in Irrigated Corn (2003) Sure-K Rate Management in Irrigated Corn (2005) Potassium
Corn: Sure-K Sure-K Rate Effect on Corn Yield (2002) Sure-K Rate Effect in Irrigated Corn (2003) Sure-K Rate Management in Irrigated Corn (2005) Potassium Fertilizer Carryover from Soybeans to corn (2006)
More informationAccelegrow. Accele-Grow-M. accelegrow.com. Accelegrow Technologies, Inc. PO BOX 569 West Point, GA
Accelegrow accelegrow.com 2009 Accelegrow Technologies, Inc. PO BOX 569 West Point, GA 31833 1-888-442-2235 is a revolutionary fertilizer providing greater yields, improved crop quality and increased profitability
More informationBEFORE USING ANY PESTICIDE STOP READ THE LABEL I Prepared by Furney A. Todd, Extension Professor of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University at
CONTROL BLACK IN BU RLEY / TOBACCO BEFORE USING ANY PESTICIDE STOP READ THE LABEL I Prepared by Furney A. Todd, Extension Professor of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University at Raleigh and the
More informationDark Tobacco Topics Dark variety update Black shank control Angular leaf spot Supplemental products Tobacco fertility Potassium Boron Nutrient prices
Dark Tobacco Topics Dark variety update Black shank control Angular leaf spot Supplemental products Tobacco fertility Potassium Boron Nutrient prices Variety 2015 Dark Tobacco Variety Guide Maturity Black
More information2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.
2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN. Behnken, Lisa B., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Jared Liebenow and
More informationRescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003
Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003 Kelly A. Nelson, Peter Scharf, Bruce Burdick, and Gene Stevens Accomplishments for year 1 (2003): Crop
More informationYield and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton and Peanut in Conventional and Sod-Based Cropping Systems
Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton and Peanut in Conventional and Sod-Based Cropping Systems Duli Zhao, David Wright, Jim Marois, Cheryl Mackowiak, and Tawainga Katsvairo IFAS-North Florida Research
More informationC.S. Vavrina Vegetable Horticulturist
Institute of Food And Agricultural Sciences Southwest Florida Research & Education Center 2686 S.R. 29 North Immokalee, FL 34142-9515 SWFREC Station Report - VEG 98.7 3July98 Phone (941)658-3400 Fax (941)657-5224
More informationDrip Irrigation Management Factors for 'Umatilla Russet' potato Production
Drip Irrigation Management Factors for 'Umatilla Russet' potato Production Clinton C. Shock, Eric P. Eldredge, and Lamont D. Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2001
More informationRURAL CONSERVATION CLUBS PROGRAM CHARING CROSS CONSERVATION CORPORATION "Manure Management in High Residue Applications" FINAL REPORT
RURAL CONSERVATION CLUBS PROGRAM CHARING CROSS CONSERVATION CORPORATION "Manure Management in High Residue Applications" FINAL REPORT CHARING CROSS CONSERVATION CORPORATION Grower: Rob Smyth Project: Pre-tillage
More informationCONVENTIONAL, STRIP, AND NO TILLAGE CORN PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION CAPACITIES
CONVENTIONAL, STRIP, AND NO TILLAGE CORN PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION CAPACITIES Dr. Freddie Lamm Research Irrigation Engineer Email: flamm@ksu.edu Dr. Rob Aiken Research Crop Scientist Email:
More informationCONSERVATION TILLAGE CONFERENCE TILLAGE AND NITROGEN INFLUENCE ON COTTON
CONSERVATION TILLAGE CONFERENCE TILLAGE AND NITROGEN INFLUENCE ON COTTON P. J. Wiatrak 1, D. L. Wright 1, F. M. Rhoads 1, S. Reed 2, and J. Pudelko 3 AUTHORS: 1 North Florida Research and Education Center,
More informationTodd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota
EFFECT OF DRIPLINE DEPTH ON FIELD CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS Freddie R. Lamm Kansas State University Northwest Research-Extension Center Colby, Kansas flamm@ksu.edu Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University
More informationFertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits
Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits Dr. Alan Walters Southern Illinois University No-till is an agricultural technique: --increases the amount of water that infiltrates into the soil --increases
More information2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn
-1-2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn Kiersten Wise (Dept. of Botany & Plant Pathology, kawise@purdue.edu) and RL (Bob) Nielsen (Dept. of Agronomy,
More informationCROP ROTATION AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS FOR CONSERVATION COMPLIANCE FOR BLACKLAND PRAIRIE
CROP ROTATION AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS FOR CONSERVATION COMPLIANCE FOR BLACKLAND PRAIRIE R. L. Ivy 1, N. W. Buehring 2, S. R.Spurlock 3, J. D. Summers 4, M. Blaine 3, and J. D. Roberts 5 INTRODUCTION The Blackbelt
More informationNITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION
NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION Erik B. G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, and Lamont Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon, 1996
More informationRESIDUAL HERBICIDE CARRYOVER SIMULATION IN TRANSPLANTED VIDALIA ONIONS II
RESIDUAL HERBICIDE CARRYOVER SIMULATION IN TRANSPLANTED VIDALIA ONIONS II Timothy L. Grey and A. Stanley Culpepper Crop and Soil Science Department University of Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station
More informationTomato Tips for Success. Introduction to Tomatoes! In The Beginning. Tomatoes in Europe 8/17/2017
Introduction to Tomatoes! Missouri Tomato School Joplin, MO August 14, 2017 Dr. Richard G. Snyder Professor & Vegetable Specialist In The Beginning Tomato plants originated in Central and South America
More informationIntroduction to Tomatoes!
Introduction to Tomatoes! Missouri Tomato School Joplin, MO August 14, 2017 Dr. Richard G. Snyder Professor & Vegetable Specialist In The Beginning Tomato plants originated in Central and South America
More informationIrrigation Criteria for Sweet Potato Production Using Drip Irrigation
Irrigation Criteria for Sweet Potato Production Using Drip Irrigation Joel Felix, Assistant Professor Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 595 Onion Ave., Ontario, OR 97914 Clinton Shock,
More informationPrevious Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. soybean various 2002
Trial ID: WA Fall&Spring Study Dir.: Location: Parker South #1 Investigator: David L Regehr CROP AND WEED DESCRIPTION Weed Code Common Name Scientific Name 1. LAMAM HENBIT LAMIUM AMPLEXICAULE L. 2. BROTE
More informationYIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS
Beef Cattle Research - 2005 YIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS R. L. Hale 1, C. T. Thompson 1, T. J. Dumler 1, M. Hampton 2, and G. L. Gold 3 Summary Nine varieties and a commercial
More informationMANAGEMENT FACTORS ENHANCING THE FEASIBILITY OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION FOR POTATO
MANAGEMENT FACTORS ENHANCING THE FEASIBILITY OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION FOR POTATO Clinton C. Shock, Eric P. Eldredge, Erik B.G. Feibert, and Lamont D. Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State
More informationEvaluation of biodegradable mulches in fresh market sweet corn, pepper production
Evaluation of biodegradable mulches in fresh market sweet corn, pepper production John Zandstra Rob Squire Ridgetown Campus, University of Guelph Sean Westervelt Cathy Baker Simcoe Research Station, University
More informationWEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION HERBICIDE APPLIED IN FIELD CORN
WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION HERBICIDE APPLIED IN FIELD CORN Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2003 Introduction
More informationCucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012
Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Celeste Welty (Entomology); Bob Precheur, Mark Bennett, Doug Doohan (Horticulture & Crop Science);
More informationResponse of Pepper to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley Response of Pepper to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers 97-02 George J. Hochmuth 1 Abstract
More informationEvaluation of Pumpkin Cultivars and Planting Methods Within a No-till System in West Virginia
Evaluation of Pumpkin Cultivars and Planting Methods Within a No-till System in West Virginia Lewis W Jett, Commercial Vegetable Crops Specialist West Virginia University, 2102 Agriculture Sciences Building,
More information2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.
2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN. Breitenbach, Fritz, R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jerffrey R. Gunsolus, Adam Roerish, and Amber M. Lee The objective of this trial
More informationPREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN
PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN Corey V. Ransom and Joey Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR 1998 Introduction These studies evaluated
More informationPoly-Coated Urea Rate Influences Sweet Corn Yield
Poly-Coated Urea Rate Influences Sweet Corn Yield Dr. Ron Goldy, Carly Andres and Virginia Wendzel, Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center, 1791 Hillandale Road, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49022
More informationPlanning for Weed Management in Vegetables
Planning for Weed Management in Vegetables Presented at Indiana Horticultural Congress January 30, 2007 Steve Weller and Liz Maynard Dept. of Horticulture and LA Purdue University weller@purdue.edu emaynard@purdue.edu
More information