Agriculture and Climate Change Revisited
|
|
- Arnold Thompson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Agriculture and Climate Change Revisited Anthony Fisher 1 Michael Hanemann 1 Michael Roberts 2 Wolfram Schlenker 3 1 University California at Berkeley 2 North Carolina State University 3 Columbia University and NBER World Bank - October 16, 2009
2 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
3 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
4 Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture and Climate Change Mounting evidence that climate is changing Emerging consenus that temperature will increase Several studies focus on agricultural sector Climate / weather directly impacts agricultural production Green revolution drastically increased yields In 1800: 75-80% of population worked in agriculture Food less scare today (recent run up in prices) Agriculture - large share of GDP in developing countries Agriculture - small share of GDP in the US, but US produces 40% of all corn in the world (38% of all soybeans, 20% of all cotton) Impacts in the US will influence world supply and prices Discussion whether US will be net beneficiary or net loser
5 Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture and Climate Change Mounting evidence that climate is changing Emerging consenus that temperature will increase Several studies focus on agricultural sector Climate / weather directly impacts agricultural production Green revolution drastically increased yields In 1800: 75-80% of population worked in agriculture Food less scare today (recent run up in prices) Agriculture - large share of GDP in developing countries Agriculture - small share of GDP in the US, but US produces 40% of all corn in the world (38% of all soybeans, 20% of all cotton) Impacts in the US will influence world supply and prices Discussion whether US will be net beneficiary or net loser
6 Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture and Climate Change Mounting evidence that climate is changing Emerging consenus that temperature will increase Several studies focus on agricultural sector Climate / weather directly impacts agricultural production Green revolution drastically increased yields In 1800: 75-80% of population worked in agriculture Food less scare today (recent run up in prices) Agriculture - large share of GDP in developing countries Agriculture - small share of GDP in the US, but US produces 40% of all corn in the world (38% of all soybeans, 20% of all cotton) Impacts in the US will influence world supply and prices Discussion whether US will be net beneficiary or net loser
7 Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture and Climate Change Mounting evidence that climate is changing Emerging consenus that temperature will increase Several studies focus on agricultural sector Climate / weather directly impacts agricultural production Green revolution drastically increased yields In 1800: 75-80% of population worked in agriculture Food less scare today (recent run up in prices) Agriculture - large share of GDP in developing countries Agriculture - small share of GDP in the US, but US produces 40% of all corn in the world (38% of all soybeans, 20% of all cotton) Impacts in the US will influence world supply and prices Discussion whether US will be net beneficiary or net loser
8 Setting the Stage Background - Agricultural Production Five Largest Producers
9 Setting the Stage Background - Agricultural Production Caloric Production (Corn, Rice, Soybeans, and Wheat)
10 Setting the Stage Background - Agricultural Production Caloric Production (Corn, Rice, Soybeans, and Wheat) We focus on US agriculture
11 Motivation Model/Data Results Impacts Comparisons Conclusions Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture in the US Elevation Map
12 Setting the Stage Background - Agriculture in the US Agricultural Area (2.5x2.5mile grids)
13 Setting the Stage Literature Review Early studies of agricultural productivity Ronald Fisher: Studies in Crop Variation I-VI Developed Maximum Likelihood Estimator More recent studies of agricultural productivity Crop simulation models Daily temperature and precipitation values Too many parameters to estimate (calibrated instead) Other inputs are held constant Reduced-form statistical studies Large geographic extend (entire US) Average weather variables (spatial or temporal)
14 Setting the Stage Literature Review Early studies of agricultural productivity Ronald Fisher: Studies in Crop Variation I-VI Developed Maximum Likelihood Estimator More recent studies of agricultural productivity Crop simulation models Daily temperature and precipitation values Too many parameters to estimate (calibrated instead) Other inputs are held constant Reduced-form statistical studies Large geographic extend (entire US) Average weather variables (spatial or temporal)
15 Setting the Stage Literature Review Early studies of agricultural productivity Ronald Fisher: Studies in Crop Variation I-VI Developed Maximum Likelihood Estimator More recent studies of agricultural productivity Crop simulation models Daily temperature and precipitation values Too many parameters to estimate (calibrated instead) Other inputs are held constant Reduced-form statistical studies Large geographic extend (entire US) Average weather variables (spatial or temporal)
16 Setting the Stage Statistical Studies: Cross Section versus Panel Cross-section analysis of farmland values Value of land if put to best use Climate varies across space (south is hotter) Pro: measures how farmers adapt to various climates Con: omitted variables problem Panel of yields or profits Link year-to-year fluctuations in weather to profits/yield Pro: panel allows for use of fixed effects mitigates omitted variables problem Con: Short-run response different from long-run response difference between weather and climate
17 Setting the Stage Statistical Studies: Cross Section versus Panel Cross-section analysis of farmland values Value of land if put to best use Climate varies across space (south is hotter) Pro: measures how farmers adapt to various climates Con: omitted variables problem Panel of yields or profits Link year-to-year fluctuations in weather to profits/yield Pro: panel allows for use of fixed effects mitigates omitted variables problem Con: Short-run response different from long-run response difference between weather and climate
18 Setting the Stage Statistical Studies: Cross Section versus Panel Weather Variable Nonlinear Temperature Average Temperature Effects Cross- Section slightly positive large negative Panel Data insignificant
19 Setting the Stage Statistical Studies: Cross Section versus Panel Weather Variable Nonlinear Temperature Average Temperature Effects Cross- slightly positive Section large negative large negative Panel insignificant large negative Data
20 Main Findings The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Nonlinear relationship between yields and temperature Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme heat measured by degree days 30 C Degrees above 30C, e.g., 34C is 4 degree days 30C Degree days 30 C Explain 45% of variation in aggregate corn yields Similar relationship in cross section and time series Similar relationship in cross section of farmland values
21 Main Findings The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Nonlinear relationship between yields and temperature Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme heat measured by degree days 30 C Degrees above 30C, e.g., 34C is 4 degree days 30C Degree days 30 C Explain 45% of variation in aggregate corn yields Similar relationship in cross section and time series Similar relationship in cross section of farmland values
22 Main Findings The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Nonlinear relationship between yields and temperature Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme heat measured by degree days 30 C Degrees above 30C, e.g., 34C is 4 degree days 30C Degree days 30 C Explain 45% of variation in aggregate corn yields Similar relationship in cross section and time series Similar relationship in cross section of farmland values
23 Main Findings The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Nonlinear relationship between yields and temperature Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme heat measured by degree days 30 C Degrees above 30C, e.g., 34C is 4 degree days 30C Degree days 30 C Explain 45% of variation in aggregate corn yields Similar relationship in cross section and time series Similar relationship in cross section of farmland values
24 Main Findings Implication for Climate Change Both panel and cross-section give similar results If extreme temperatures are included in regression equation Difficulty to adapt to extreme temperatures Different results in previous studies Not driven by different sources of identification Cross section versus panel But difference in data / specification / climate model Large predicted damages in all models Extreme temperatures become more frequent
25 Main Findings Implication for Climate Change Both panel and cross-section give similar results If extreme temperatures are included in regression equation Difficulty to adapt to extreme temperatures Different results in previous studies Not driven by different sources of identification Cross section versus panel But difference in data / specification / climate model Large predicted damages in all models Extreme temperatures become more frequent
26 Main Findings Implication for Climate Change Both panel and cross-section give similar results If extreme temperatures are included in regression equation Difficulty to adapt to extreme temperatures Different results in previous studies Not driven by different sources of identification Cross section versus panel But difference in data / specification / climate model Large predicted damages in all models Extreme temperatures become more frequent
27 Main Findings Implication for Climate Change Both panel and cross-section give similar results If extreme temperatures are included in regression equation Difficulty to adapt to extreme temperatures Different results in previous studies Not driven by different sources of identification Cross section versus panel But difference in data / specification / climate model Large predicted damages in all models Extreme temperatures become more frequent
28 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
29 Model Model Specification - SR (2009) Log yields y it are additively influenced by temperature h y it = h h g(h)φ it (h)dh + z it δ + c i + ɛ it where y it : log yield in county i in year t h: heat / temperature g(): growth as a function of heat φ it : time crop is exposed to heat t in county i in year t z it : other controls (precipitation, quadratic time trend by state) c i : county fixed effect ɛ it : error (we adjust for spatial correlation)
30 Model Model Specification - SR (2009) Let Φ it (h) be the total time temperatures are below h Dummy-variable approach (discretize integral) y it = 39 j=0,3,6,9,... Chebyshev polynomials (mth-order) γ j [Φ it (h + 3) Φ it (h)] +z itδ + c i + ɛ it }{{} x it,j y it = = 39 h= 1 j=1 m j=1 m γ j T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] + z it δ + c i + ɛ it 39 γ j h= 1 T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] +z it δ + c i + ɛ it } {{ } x it,j
31 Model Model Specification - SR (2009) Let Φ it (h) be the total time temperatures are below h Dummy-variable approach (discretize integral) y it = 39 j=0,3,6,9,... Chebyshev polynomials (mth-order) γ j [Φ it (h + 3) Φ it (h)] +z itδ + c i + ɛ it }{{} x it,j y it = = 39 h= 1 j=1 m j=1 m γ j T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] + z it δ + c i + ɛ it 39 γ j h= 1 T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] +z it δ + c i + ɛ it } {{ } x it,j
32 Model Model Specification - SR (2009) Let Φ it (h) be the total time temperatures are below h Dummy-variable approach (discretize integral) y it = 39 j=0,3,6,9,... Chebyshev polynomials (mth-order) γ j [Φ it (h + 3) Φ it (h)] +z itδ + c i + ɛ it }{{} x it,j y it = = 39 h= 1 j=1 m j=1 m γ j T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] + z it δ + c i + ɛ it 39 γ j h= 1 T j (h + 0.5) [Φ it (h + 1) Φ it (h)] +z it δ + c i + ɛ it } {{ } x it,j
33 Data - Dependent Variables Descriptive Statistics - Dependent Variables Average Corn Yields in Bushels / Acre ( )
34 Data - Dependent Variables Descriptive Statistics - Dependent Variables Average Soybean Yields in Bushels / Acre ( )
35 Data - Dependent Variables Descriptive Statistics - Dependent Variables Average Cotton Yields in Pounds / Acre ( )
36 Data - Weather Fine-scaled Weather Data Set Daily minimum / maximum temperature and precipitation 2.5x2.5 mile grid for entire US Constructed from individual weather stations PRISM interpolation procedure Time temperatures are in each 1 C interval Sinusoidal curve between minimum and maximum temp. Sum over days in growing season March-August for corn and soybeans April-October for cotton Weather in county Satellite scan of agricultural area Weighted average of all 2.5x2.5 mile grids in county
37 Data - Weather Fine-scaled Weather Data Set Daily minimum / maximum temperature and precipitation 2.5x2.5 mile grid for entire US Constructed from individual weather stations PRISM interpolation procedure Time temperatures are in each 1 C interval Sinusoidal curve between minimum and maximum temp. Sum over days in growing season March-August for corn and soybeans April-October for cotton Weather in county Satellite scan of agricultural area Weighted average of all 2.5x2.5 mile grids in county
38 Data - Weather Fine-scaled Weather Data Set Daily minimum / maximum temperature and precipitation 2.5x2.5 mile grid for entire US Constructed from individual weather stations PRISM interpolation procedure Time temperatures are in each 1 C interval Sinusoidal curve between minimum and maximum temp. Sum over days in growing season March-August for corn and soybeans April-October for cotton Weather in county Satellite scan of agricultural area Weighted average of all 2.5x2.5 mile grids in county
39 Data - Weather Descriptive Statistics - Weather Average Weather in Sample ( )
40 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
41 Panel of Crop Yields Link between Temperature and Yields Panel of Corn and Soybean Yields
42 Panel of Crop Yields Link between Temperature and Yields Panel of Corn and Soybean Yields
43 Panel of Crop Yields Link between Temperature and Yields Panel of Corn and Soybean Yields
44 Panel of Crop Yields Link between Temperature and Yields Panel of Cotton Yields
45 Comparison of Temperature Variables The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Model comparison tests Horse race: which specification does best? Estimate model using 85% of data Predict observations for remaining 15% of data Check how close predictions are to actual outcomes How much do weather variables reduce error
46 Comparison of Temperature Variables The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Notes: Table compares various temperature specifications for corn, soybeans, and cotton according to the root mean squared out-of sample prediction error.
47 Comparison of Temperature Variables The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Assessment of extreme heat by futures market New information about expected yields will move prices Weekly corn futures returns Extreme temperatures move prices up significantly No significant relationship with average temperature Next steps Check various sources of identification How robust are results?
48 Comparison of Temperature Variables The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Assessment of extreme heat by futures market New information about expected yields will move prices Weekly corn futures returns Extreme temperatures move prices up significantly No significant relationship with average temperature Next steps Check various sources of identification How robust are results?
49 Robustness and Sensitivity Checks Various Sources of Identification Cross-Section versus Time Series
50 Robustness and Sensitivity Checks Adaptation and Technology Progress Limited Adaptation in Warmer Climates
51 Robustness and Sensitivity Checks Adaptation and Technology Progress Limited Adaptation in Warmer Climates
52 Robustness and Sensitivity Checks Adaptation and Technology Progress Corn: Limited Progress in Heat Tolerance
53 Robustness and Sensitivity Checks Adaptation and Technology Progress Corn: Limited Progress in Heat Tolerance
54 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
55 Impact on Yields Impact on Crop Yields Predicted damages large and significant Driving Force: extreme heat predicted to increase Especially by end of century Extreme temperature are highly damaging to crop Caveats Does not allow for CO 2 fertilization Keeps crops, growing area, and planting dates fixed Will present sensitivity checks below
56 Impact on Yields Impact on Crop Yields Predicted damages large and significant Driving Force: extreme heat predicted to increase Especially by end of century Extreme temperature are highly damaging to crop Caveats Does not allow for CO 2 fertilization Keeps crops, growing area, and planting dates fixed Will present sensitivity checks below
57 Data - Climate Change IPCC Emission Scenarios Slowest Warming (B1), Fastest Warming (A1FI)
58 Data - Climate Change Changes in Crop Yields (Percent) Medium Term ( )
59 Data - Climate Change Changes in Crop Yields (Percent) Long Term ( )
60 Data - Climate Change Impact on Crop Yields Examining adaptation possibilities Limited effect of shift in planting dates Corn: Shift planting dates one month forward (Feb-July) Damages (A1FI - long term) decrease from 79% to 64% Less extreme heat in February than August But: Also less solar radiation Limited potential for adaptation within species Comparable results for various subsets (north, south, etc) Comparable results in time series and cross section
61 Data - Climate Change Impact on Crop Yields Examining adaptation possibilities Limited effect of shift in planting dates Corn: Shift planting dates one month forward (Feb-July) Damages (A1FI - long term) decrease from 79% to 64% Less extreme heat in February than August But: Also less solar radiation Limited potential for adaptation within species Comparable results for various subsets (north, south, etc) Comparable results in time series and cross section
62 Data - Climate Change Impact on Crop Yields Examining adaptation possibilities Limited effect of shift in planting dates Corn: Shift planting dates one month forward (Feb-July) Damages (A1FI - long term) decrease from 79% to 64% Less extreme heat in February than August But: Also less solar radiation Limited potential for adaptation within species Comparable results for various subsets (north, south, etc) Comparable results in time series and cross section
63 Impact on Farmland Values Farmland Values Cross section analysis of farmland values Value of land reflects profitability of land Allows for adaptation (land is put to best use) Compares values across climatic regions Schlenker, Hanemann and Fisher (2006) Counties east of 100 degree meridian Farmland values linked to degree days (8-32 C, 34 C) Controls for income, population density, soil controls Extreme heat (degree days 34 C) very damaging Omitted variable bias? Robust to inclusion/exclusion of controls if model uses degree days!
64 Impact on Farmland Values Farmland Values Cross section analysis of farmland values Value of land reflects profitability of land Allows for adaptation (land is put to best use) Compares values across climatic regions Schlenker, Hanemann and Fisher (2006) Counties east of 100 degree meridian Farmland values linked to degree days (8-32 C, 34 C) Controls for income, population density, soil controls Extreme heat (degree days 34 C) very damaging Omitted variable bias? Robust to inclusion/exclusion of controls if model uses degree days!
65 Impact on Farmland Values Farmland Values Cross section analysis of farmland values Value of land reflects profitability of land Allows for adaptation (land is put to best use) Compares values across climatic regions Schlenker, Hanemann and Fisher (2006) Counties east of 100 degree meridian Farmland values linked to degree days (8-32 C, 34 C) Controls for income, population density, soil controls Extreme heat (degree days 34 C) very damaging Omitted variable bias? Robust to inclusion/exclusion of controls if model uses degree days!
66 Impact on Farmland Values Farmland Values Including / Excluding Controls (1,048,576 Permutations)
67 Impact on Farmland Values Farmland Values versus Corn/Soybeans Yields Long Term ( ) Area-weighted Impact by County Variable Impact (t-val) Mean Min Max Std Farmland Values HCM3 - B HCM3 - B HCM3 - A HCM3 - A1FI Corn HCM3 - B (19.20) HCM3 - B (21.13) HCM3 - A (16.01) HCM3 - A1FI (14.61) Soybeans HCM3 - B (22.25) HCM3 - B (24.54) HCM3 - A (20.56) HCM3 - A1FI (18.96)
68 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
69 Deschenes and Greenstone - Summary Summary of Paper Paper pioneered the use of panel data Authors focus predominantly on profits One sensitivity check using corn and soybean yields Find no significant relationship between weather and profit Agriculture is predicted to benefit from warming Potential concerns Data quality issues Yield regression does not account for extreme heat Profit uses sales in a given year Omits storage / short-run price response Assume weather is bad in a year price increases and storage is depleted (as price is high) sales will not necessarily decrease!
70 Deschenes and Greenstone - Summary Summary of Paper Paper pioneered the use of panel data Authors focus predominantly on profits One sensitivity check using corn and soybean yields Find no significant relationship between weather and profit Agriculture is predicted to benefit from warming Potential concerns Data quality issues Yield regression does not account for extreme heat Profit uses sales in a given year Omits storage / short-run price response Assume weather is bad in a year price increases and storage is depleted (as price is high) sales will not necessarily decrease!
71 Deschenes and Greenstone - Summary Summary of Paper Paper pioneered the use of panel data Authors focus predominantly on profits One sensitivity check using corn and soybean yields Find no significant relationship between weather and profit Agriculture is predicted to benefit from warming Potential concerns Data quality issues Yield regression does not account for extreme heat Profit uses sales in a given year Omits storage / short-run price response Assume weather is bad in a year price increases and storage is depleted (as price is high) sales will not necessarily decrease!
72 Deschenes and Greenstone - Summary Summary of Paper Paper pioneered the use of panel data Authors focus predominantly on profits One sensitivity check using corn and soybean yields Find no significant relationship between weather and profit Agriculture is predicted to benefit from warming Potential concerns Data quality issues Yield regression does not account for extreme heat Profit uses sales in a given year Omits storage / short-run price response Assume weather is bad in a year price increases and storage is depleted (as price is high) sales will not necessarily decrease!
73 Deschenes and Greenstone - Data Data Concerns
74 Deschenes and Greenstone - Data Data Concerns Variable dd89 in DG Replication of dd89 R 2 σ e e > 1F R 2 σ e e > 1F (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) No Fixed Effects (F.E.) 6.82F 91.1% 6.07F 89.8% County F.E F 56.5% F 64.7% County + Year F.E F 54.8% F 24.2% County + State-by-Year F.E F 50.5% F 1.3%
75 Deschenes and Greenstone - Data Data Concerns
76 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
77 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
78 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
79 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (1.23) (1.71) (1.66) [s.e. Conley] [2.12] [5.57] [5.18] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) [s.e. Conley] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
80 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (1.23) (1.71) (1.66) [s.e. Conley] [2.12] [5.57] [5.18] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) (3.69) (3.97) [s.e. Conley] [13.09] [11.76] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
81 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 12.6% 21.3% 26.3% 15.3% 31.0% 38.1% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (1.23) (1.71) (1.66) (1.38) (1.73) (1.64) [s.e. Conley] [2.12] [5.57] [5.18] [1.96] [4.93] [4.39] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) (3.69) (3.97) (3.87) (3.92) [s.e. Conley] [13.09] [11.76] [11.94] [10.60] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
82 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 7.2% 13.9% 18.5% 12.6% 20.3% 23.4% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (1.08) (3.31) (3.05) (0.95) (2.74) (2.67) [s.e. Conley] [1.36] [7.24] [6.01] [0.88] [5.22] [4.21] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) (7.23) (6.83) (6.05) (5.79) [s.e. Conley] [16.54] [13.93] [12.73] [9.85] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes State-By-Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
83 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Profit Profit (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 0.5% 1.4% 1.5% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (3.03) (6.90) (6.63) [s.e. Conley] [4.07] [12.25] [12.14] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) (11.24) (11.30) [s.e. Conley] [20.04] [21.54] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes No No No State-By-Year FE No No No Yes Yes Yes
84 Deschenes and Greenstone - Yield and Profit Comparison of Yield/Profit Regressions Profit Profit (1a) (1b) (1c) (2a) (2b) (2c) Regression diagnostics Variance explained by weather 0.5% 1.4% 1.5% 0.5% 0.7% 0.9% Model comparison tests (J-test) DG against other weather (t-value) Other weather against DG (t-value) Climate change impact (Percent) Hadley II-IS92a scenario (s.e.) (3.03) (6.90) (6.63) (2.87) (12.85) (12.86) [s.e. Conley] [4.07] [12.25] [12.14] [2.56] [12.53] [12.80] Hadley III-B2 scenario (s.e.) (11.24) (11.30) (20.24) (20.72) [s.e. Conley] [20.04] [21.54] [19.76] [20.85] Observations Soil controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes No No No State-By-Year FE No No No Yes Yes Yes
85 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
86 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
87 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
88 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
89 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
90 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
91 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage The Importance of Storage
92 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage Do Yield Shocks Translate Into Sales? Regressing Sales on Value of Production (Quantity times Price) Using County and Year Fixed Effects Combined Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Using all farms in a county Coefficient Std. Error (0.012) (0.012) (0.007) (0.009) (0.025) Observations Using farms with no livestock Coefficient Std. Error (0.016) (0.013) (0.008) (0.010) (0.029) Observations
93 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage Do Yield Shocks Translate Into Sales? Regressing Sales on Value of Production (Quantity times Price) Using County and State-by-Year Fixed Effects Combined Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Using all farms in a county Coefficient Std. Error (0.010) (0.012) (0.007) (0.010) (0.019) Observations Using farms with no livestock Coefficient Std. Error (0.016) (0.015) (0.009) (0.012) (0.021) Observations
94 Deschenes and Greenstone - Storage Do Yield Shocks Translate Into Sales? Regressing State-level Log Storage on Extreme Heat Using County and State-by-Year Fixed Effects Corn Soybeans (1a) (1b) (2a) (2b) Extreme Heat -1.57e e e e-3 (s.e.) (7.65e-4) (7.73e-4) (9.41e-4) (8.98e-4) Extreme Heat (Lag 1) 4.02e e-3 (s.e.) (7.85e-4) (9.15e-4) Extreme Heat (Lag 2) 7.36e e-3 (s.e.) (7.50e-4) (9.44e-4) Observations Year F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes County F.E. Yes Yes Yes Yes
95 Deschenes and Greenstone - Robustness of Hedonic Regression Robustness of Hedonic Regression
96 Deschenes and Greenstone - Robustness of Hedonic Regression Robustness of Hedonic Regression
97 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Summary of Paper Paper pioneered hedonic analysis of farmland values Link farmland values in the entire US to climate Authors use two sets of weights Cropland weights: large damages from global warming Croprevenue weights: modest benefits from global warming Potential concerns Access to highly subsidized irrigation water in the West Subsidy higher than average farmland value in east Subsidy capitalizes into farmland values Regression equates higher temperature with subsidies!
98 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Summary of Paper Paper pioneered hedonic analysis of farmland values Link farmland values in the entire US to climate Authors use two sets of weights Cropland weights: large damages from global warming Croprevenue weights: modest benefits from global warming Potential concerns Access to highly subsidized irrigation water in the West Subsidy higher than average farmland value in east Subsidy capitalizes into farmland values Regression equates higher temperature with subsidies!
99 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Irrigated vs Non-irrigated Test: Is East different from West Chow test with p-value less than Focus on East only Large damages under both set of weights
100 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Irrigated vs Non-irrigated Test: Is East different from West Chow test with p-value less than Focus on East only Large damages under both set of weights
101 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Irrigated vs Non-irrigated
102 Mendelsohn, Nordhaus and Shaw Irrigated vs Non-irrigated
103 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model and Data Summary 3 Empirical Results 4 Climate Change Impacts 5 Comparison to Other Studies 6 Conclusions
104 Main Findings Conclusions Agricultural output directly linked to weather Nonlinear relationship between weather and yields Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme temperatures have dominating effect Accounting for extreme temperatures gives superior out-of-sample forecasts Comparable results using Panel of yields Time series of aggregate (national yields) Cross section of average yields in a county Futures market returns Various subsets (geographic / temporal) Cross section of average farmland value in a county
105 Main Findings Conclusions Agricultural output directly linked to weather Nonlinear relationship between weather and yields Yields increasing in temperature until upper threshold 29 C for corn, 30 C for soybeans, and 32 C for cotton Yields decreasing in temperature above threshold Slope of decline much steeper than slope of incline Extreme temperatures have dominating effect Accounting for extreme temperatures gives superior out-of-sample forecasts Comparable results using Panel of yields Time series of aggregate (national yields) Cross section of average yields in a county Futures market returns Various subsets (geographic / temporal) Cross section of average farmland value in a county
106 Main Findings Conclusions - Impacts Large damages from global warming Extreme temperatures become more frequent Heat waves have strong negative effects Yields by the end of the century are predicted to decrease 30%-46% under slow-warming (B1) scenario 63%-82% under fast-warming (A1FI) scenario Limited potential for adaptation Cross-section of yields has same shape as time-series Similar relationship for farmland values wider set of adaptations Analysis first step More structural model of crop choice, planting dates, etc Need to account for extreme temperatures
107 Main Findings Conclusions - Impacts Large damages from global warming Extreme temperatures become more frequent Heat waves have strong negative effects Yields by the end of the century are predicted to decrease 30%-46% under slow-warming (B1) scenario 63%-82% under fast-warming (A1FI) scenario Limited potential for adaptation Cross-section of yields has same shape as time-series Similar relationship for farmland values wider set of adaptations Analysis first step More structural model of crop choice, planting dates, etc Need to account for extreme temperatures
108 Main Findings Conclusions - Impacts Large damages from global warming Extreme temperatures become more frequent Heat waves have strong negative effects Yields by the end of the century are predicted to decrease 30%-46% under slow-warming (B1) scenario 63%-82% under fast-warming (A1FI) scenario Limited potential for adaptation Cross-section of yields has same shape as time-series Similar relationship for farmland values wider set of adaptations Analysis first step More structural model of crop choice, planting dates, etc Need to account for extreme temperatures
109 Model/Data Results Impacts Outline 7 Model and Data Summary 8 Empirical Results 9 Climate Change Impacts
110 Model/Data Results Impacts Northern and Southern Counties Geographic Subgroups of Counties
111 Model/Data Results Impacts Sinusoidal Interpolation Time in Each 1 C Interval
112 Model/Data Results Impacts Sinusoidal Interpolation Time in Each 1 C Interval
113 Model/Data Results Impacts Sinusoidal Interpolation Time in Each 1 C Interval
114 Model/Data Results Impacts Sinusoidal Interpolation Time in Each 1 C Interval
115 Model/Data Results Impacts Spatial Interpolation Spatial Interpolation of Weather Station Data
116 Model/Data Results Impacts Spatial Interpolation Spatial Interpolation of Weather Station Data
117 Model/Data Results Impacts Spatial Interpolation Spatial Interpolation of Weather Station Data
118 Model/Data Results Impacts Outline 7 Model and Data Summary 8 Empirical Results 9 Climate Change Impacts
119 Model/Data Results Impacts Panel of Crop Yields Other Regression Results Precipitation variable Significant inverted U-shape for corn and soybeans Optimum: 25 inches for corn / 27.2 inches for soybeans Not significant for cotton (highly irrigated) Quadratic time trend by state Almost threefold increase in average yields Summary statistics Corn: R-squared of 0.77 using 105,981 observations Soybeans: R-squared of 0.63 using 82,385 observations Cotton: R-squared of 0.37 using 31,540 observations Weather explains roughly one third of variance
120 Model/Data Results Impacts Panel of Crop Yields Other Regression Results Precipitation variable Significant inverted U-shape for corn and soybeans Optimum: 25 inches for corn / 27.2 inches for soybeans Not significant for cotton (highly irrigated) Quadratic time trend by state Almost threefold increase in average yields Summary statistics Corn: R-squared of 0.77 using 105,981 observations Soybeans: R-squared of 0.63 using 82,385 observations Cotton: R-squared of 0.37 using 31,540 observations Weather explains roughly one third of variance
121 Model/Data Results Impacts Panel of Crop Yields Other Regression Results Precipitation variable Significant inverted U-shape for corn and soybeans Optimum: 25 inches for corn / 27.2 inches for soybeans Not significant for cotton (highly irrigated) Quadratic time trend by state Almost threefold increase in average yields Summary statistics Corn: R-squared of 0.77 using 105,981 observations Soybeans: R-squared of 0.63 using 82,385 observations Cotton: R-squared of 0.37 using 31,540 observations Weather explains roughly one third of variance
122 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Model comparison tests Horse race: which specification does best? Estimate model using 48 of 56 year (86% of data) Predict observations for remaining 8 years Check how close predictions are to actual outcomes New models gives best forecasts Nonlinear effects of temperatures Extreme temperatures drive down yields significantly Welch test of 1000 repetitions None significant difference among new models All new models significantly better than previous models
123 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Model comparison tests Horse race: which specification does best? Estimate model using 48 of 56 year (86% of data) Predict observations for remaining 8 years Check how close predictions are to actual outcomes New models gives best forecasts Nonlinear effects of temperatures Extreme temperatures drive down yields significantly Welch test of 1000 repetitions None significant difference among new models All new models significantly better than previous models
124 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Model comparison tests Horse race: which specification does best? Estimate model using 48 of 56 year (86% of data) Predict observations for remaining 8 years Check how close predictions are to actual outcomes New models gives best forecasts Nonlinear effects of temperatures Extreme temperatures drive down yields significantly Welch test of 1000 repetitions None significant difference among new models All new models significantly better than previous models
125 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures Notes: Table compares various temperature specifications for corn, soybeans, and cotton according to the root mean squared out-of sample prediction error.
126 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures RMS Welch Test for Equal Forecast Accuracy (RMS) Step Piecewise Monthly Degree Days Degree Days Function Linear Averages (Thom) (Daily Mean) Polynomial (8th-order) Step Function Piecewise Linear Monthly Averages Degree Days (Thom) Degree Days (Daily Mean) County F.E. (No Weather)
127 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures RMS Welch Test for Equal Forecast Accuracy (RMS) Step Piecewise Monthly Degree Days Degree Days Function Linear Averages (Thom) (Daily Mean) Polynomial (8th-order) Step Function Piecewise Linear Monthly Averages Degree Days (Thom) Degree Days (Daily Mean) County F.E. (No Weather)
128 Model/Data Results Impacts Model Comparison The Importance of Extreme Temperatures RMS Welch Test for Equal Forecast Accuracy (RMS) Step Piecewise Monthly Degree Days Degree Days Function Linear Averages (Thom) (Daily Mean) Polynomial (8th-order) Step Function Piecewise Linear Monthly Averages Degree Days (Thom) Degree Days (Daily Mean) County F.E. (No Weather)
129 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Additive Effects of Heat Corn: Temperature Effects are Additive
130 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Additive Effects of Heat Soybeans: Temperature Effects are Additive
131 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Additive Effects of Heat Cotton: Temperature Effects are Additive
132 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Various Definitions of Growing Season Corn
133 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Various Definitions of Growing Season Soybeans
134 Model/Data Results Impacts Growing Season Various Definitions of Growing Season Cotton
135 Model/Data Results Impacts Outline 7 Model and Data Summary 8 Empirical Results 9 Climate Change Impacts
136 Model/Data Results Impacts Data - Construction Climate Change Predictions Hadley HCM3 model (216 grid points covering the US) Change in climatic variables ( ) and ( ) compared to ( ) Absolute change in minimum and maximum temperature Relative change in precipitation Distance-weighted change at each 2.5x2.5mile grid Using four surrounding Hadley grids Add predicted temperature change to historic baseline Mean shift with constant variance Multiply historic precipitation with predicted change Variance increase if predicted change >1
137 Model/Data Results Impacts Data - Construction Climate Change Predictions Hadley HCM3 model (216 grid points covering the US) Change in climatic variables ( ) and ( ) compared to ( ) Absolute change in minimum and maximum temperature Relative change in precipitation Distance-weighted change at each 2.5x2.5mile grid Using four surrounding Hadley grids Add predicted temperature change to historic baseline Mean shift with constant variance Multiply historic precipitation with predicted change Variance increase if predicted change >1
138 Model/Data Results Impacts Data - Descriptive Statistics Descriptive Statistics - Climate Change Hadley 3 Model - B1 Scenario
139 Model/Data Results Impacts Data - Descriptive Statistics Descriptive Statistics - Climate Change Hadley 3 Model - A1FI Scenario
Adaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from US Agriculture
Adaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from US Agriculture Marshall Burke and Kyle Emerick October 14, 2012 Abstract Understanding the potential impacts of climate change on economic outcomes requires
More informationDeterminants of Agricultural Output: Degree Days, Yields and Implications for Climate Change
Determinants of Agricultural Output: Degree Days, Yields and Implications for Climate Change Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting,
More informationAdaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from US Agriculture
Adaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from US Agriculture Marshall Burke and Kyle Emerick September 30, 2013 Abstract Understanding the potential impacts of climate change on economic outcomes requires
More informationResponsiveness of Crop Yield and Acreage to Prices and Climate
Responsiveness of Crop Yield and Acreage to Prices and Climate Ruiqing Miao, Madhu Khanna, and Haixiao Huang Ruiqing Miao is a postdoctoral research associate, Energy Bioscience Institute, University of
More informationExtreme Weather Events, Farm Income, and Poverty in Niger
Extreme Weather Events, Farm Income, and Poverty in Niger Yawotse Nouve Graduate Student, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business, New Mexico State University Email: nouve@nmsu.edu
More informationImpacts of Climate Change and Extreme Weather on U.S. Agricultural Productivity
Impacts of Climate Change and Extreme Weather on U.S. Agricultural Productivity Sun Ling Wang, Eldon Ball, Richard Nehring, Ryan Williams (Economic Research Service, USDA) Truong Chau (Pennsylvania State
More information10 Energy consumption of buildings direct impacts of a warming climate and rebound effects
10 Energy consumption of buildings direct impacts of a warming climate and rebound effects energy for heating/cooling effect on total energy use and GDP Heating energy demand of Swiss households decreases
More informationInterpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water
Agronomy Guide AY-318-W SOILS (TILLAGE) Sylvie Brouder, Brenda Hofmann, Eileen Kladivko, Ron Turco, Andrea Bongen, Purdue University Department of Agronomy; Jane Frankenberger, Purdue University Department
More informationCrop Water Use Program for Irrigation
Crop Water Use Program for Irrigation Divisions of Plant Sciences, Applied Social Sciences, Food Sciences and Bioengineering, and Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences Water is an important factor
More informationWeather Effects on Expected Corn and Soybean Yields
United States Department of Agriculture A Report from the Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov FDS-13g-01 July 2013 Weather Effects on Expected Corn and Soybean Yields Paul C. Westcott, westcott@ers.usda.gov
More informationCHIAA RESEARCH REPORT NUMBER 32 RELATIONSHIP OF WEATHER FACTORS AND CROP YIELDS IN ILLINOIS
CHIAA RESEARCH REPORT NUMBER 32 RELATIONSHIP OF WEATHER FACTORS AND CROP YIELDS IN ILLINOIS by Stanley A. Changnon, Jr. Illinois State Water Survey Urbana, Illinois March 25, 1966 Prepared for Crop-Hail
More informationPotential Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture in Jamaica: Case Study of Sugar Cane, Yam, Escallion
Potential Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture in Jamaica: Case Study of Sugar Cane, Yam, Escallion Presentation to SALISES 50-50 Conference, Globalization, Climate Change and Rural Resilience, Pegasus
More informationKeywords: Climate Change, Ricardian Analysis, Rice, Impact, West Africa.
Impact of climate change on rice income: case study of four West African countries AMINOU AROUNA 1,*, BAUDELAIRE KOUTON 2, ALIOU DIAGNE 3 1 Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), Cotonou, Benin 2 Agricultural
More informationWorld Supply and Demand of Food Commodity Calories
World Supply and Demand of Food Commodity Calories THIS DRAFT: January 26, 2009 A Paper Prepared for the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 24-27 June 2009 ABSTRACT This paper
More informationTemperature Effects on Productivity and Factor Reallocation: Evidence from a Half Million Chinese Manufacturing Plants
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11132 Temperature Effects on Productivity and Factor Reallocation: Evidence from a Half Million Chinese Manufacturing Plants Peng Zhang Olivier Deschenes Kyle C. Meng
More informationClimate induced reduction in U.S.-wide soybean yields underpinned by region- and in-season-specific responses
Climate induced reduction in U.S.-wide soybean yields underpinned by region- and in-season-specific responses Introduction Spyridon Mourtzinis, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison James
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. Is Weather Really Additive in Agricultural Production? Implications for Climate Change Impacts. Ar i e l O r t i z - B o b e a
DISCUSSION PAPER December 2013 RFF DP 13-41 Is Weather Really Additive in Agricultural Production? Implications for Climate Change Impacts Ar i e l O r t i z - B o b e a 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036
More informationMultiple Choice (#1-9). Circle the letter corresponding to the best answer.
!! AP Statistics Ch. 3 Practice Test!! Name: Multiple Choice (#1-9). Circle the letter corresponding to the best answer. 1. In a statistics course, a linear regression equation was computed to predict
More informationTemperature Effects on Productivity and Factor Reallocation: Evidence from a Half Million Chinese Manufacturing Plants
Temperature Effects on Productivity and Factor Reallocation: Evidence from a Half Million Chinese Manufacturing Plants Peng Zhang Junjie Zhang Olivier Deschênes Kyle Meng August 24, 2016 Abstract Understanding
More informationEconometric versus Engineering Prediction of Water Demand and Value for Irrigation
Econometric versus Engineering Prediction of Water Demand and Value for Irrigation Swagata Ban Banerjee PO Box 197, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
More informationWageningen University, The Netherlands
Wageningen University, The Netherlands Objectives Influence of adaptation on the impact of climate change on European agriculture Improve insights in adaptation to include adaptation in assessment models
More informationUS climate change impacts from the PAGE2002 integrated assessment model used in the Stern report
Page 1 of 54 16 November 27 US climate change impacts from the PAGE22 integrated assessment model used in the Stern report Chris Hope & Stephan Alberth Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, UK
More informationTwo Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green Revolution
Two Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green Revolution Douglas Gollin 1 Casper Worm Hansen 2 Asger M. Wingender 3 Nairobi, July 7, 2017 1 Oxford University 2 University of Copenhagen 3 University of Copenhagen
More informationMicroclimate effects of wind farms on local crop yields
Microclimate effects of wind farms on local crop yields Daniel T. Kaffine January 8, 2018 Abstract This paper considers a novel spillover effect of wind farms - microclimate impacts on neighboring crop
More informationTHE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGY ON GROUNDWATER USE
3rd Quarter 2010 25(3) THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGY ON GROUNDWATER USE Lisa Pfeiffer and C.-Y. Cynthia Lin JEL Classifications: Q15, Q25, Q38 The High Plains (Ogallala) Aquifer is the largest freshwater
More informationUnderstanding the Impact of Drought on Crop Yield in South and North Carolina
Understanding the Impact of Drought on Crop Yield in South and North Carolina Junyu Lu, Gregory J. Carbone Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia Introduction Social& economical
More informationClimate Change and Agriculture
Climate Change and Agriculture Martin Parry and Cynthia Rosenzweig Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.K. Meteorological Office and Goddard Institute for Space Studies) OUTLINE What we currently
More informationDefining Good Farm Management
Management Factors: What is Important, Prices, Yields, Costs, or Technology Adoption? (updated September 1999) Terry L. Kastens and Kevin C. Dhuyvetter Agricultural Economists, Kansas State University
More informationAgriMet: Reclamation s Pacific Northwest Evapotranspiration Network
AgriMet: Reclamation s Pacific Northwest Evapotranspiration Network Peter L. Palmer 1 ABSTRACT In 1983, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) partnered to create
More informationEmpirical Assessment of Baseline Conservation Tillage Adoption Rates and Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Empirical Assessment of Baseline Conservation Tillage Adoption Rates and Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Lyubov A. Kurkalova* and Catherine L. Kling** * Department of Agribusiness
More informationClimate Change and Agriculture
Climate Change and Agriculture MARS-AGRI4CAST on-going activities Simon Kay on behalf of the MARS-AGRI4CAST Team 1 AGRI4CAST infrastructure The development of the AGRI4CAST infrastructure for climate change
More informationTHE ROLE OF WEATHER INFORMATION IN SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE: THE CASE OF SUGARCANE FARMERS IN KENYA
THE ROLE OF WEATHER INFORMATION IN SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE: THE CASE OF SUGARCANE FARMERS IN KENYA Presented to THE WEATHER IMPACT SEMINAR At WAGENINGEN, THE NETHERLANDS By BETTY A. MULIANGA, PhD 22 nd
More informationPRICE AND PROFIT: INVESTIGATING A CONUNDRUM. Carl R. Zulauf, Gary Schnitkey, and Carl T. Norden*
PRICE AND PROFIT: INVESTIGATING A CONUNDRUM Carl R. Zulauf, Gary Schnitkey, and Carl T. Norden* Paper presented at the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk
More informationA Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Temperature and Rainfall Variability on Agriculture in Dosso and Maradi Regions of Niger Republic 1
Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 6, 724-733 Published Online July 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/as http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.67070 A Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Temperature and
More informationAn Assessment of Deforestation Models for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation & forest Degradation (REDD)
An Assessment of Deforestation Models for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation & forest Degradation (REDD) A Case Study of Chiquitanía, Bolivia Oh Seok Kim Department of Geography, University of Southern
More informationEVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF 2005 MULTITEMPORAL TM AND AWiFS IMAGERY FOR CROPLAND CLASSIFICATION OF NEBRASKA INTRODUCTION
EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF 2005 MULTITEMPORAL TM AND AWiFS IMAGERY FOR CROPLAND CLASSIFICATION OF NEBRASKA Robert Seffrin, Statistician US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service
More informationRethinking US Agricultural Policy:
Rethinking US Agricultural Policy: Changing Course to Secure Farmer Livelihoods Worldwide Daryll E. Ray Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Kelly J. Tiller Agricultural Policy Analysis Center The University of
More informationRP0283 A Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on Italian Agriculture
Research Papers Issue RP0283 April 2017 ECIP Economic analysis of Climate Impacts and Policy Division RP0283 A Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on Italian Agriculture By Martina Bozzola
More informationCHIAA Research Report No. 22 PREDICTION OF CORN AND SOYBEAN YIELDS USING WEATHER DATA
CHIAA Research Report No. 22 PREDICTION OF CORN AND SOYBEAN YIELDS USING WEATHER DATA by Stanley A. Changnon, Jr. Illinois State Water Survey Urbana, Illinois Prepared for Crop-Hail Insurance Actuarial
More informationStagnant Smallholder Agriculture? Rice Yield Dynamics in the. Jean Claude Randrianarisoa Christopher B. Barrett
Stagnant Smallholder Agriculture? Rice Yield Dynamics in the Highlands of Madagascar Jean Claude Randrianarisoa i Christopher B. Barrett March 2007 Motivation Aggregate time series show stagnation in rice
More informationIMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGES ON FARMLAND CONVERSION IN CALIFORNIA
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGES ON FARMLAND CONVERSION IN CALIFORNIA Frankie Le 1 Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics University of California at Berkeley September 2009 Abstract To model the impact
More informationThe Crop Connection: Impact of Cell Phone Access on Crop Choice in Rural Pakistan
The Crop Connection: Impact of Cell Phone Access on Crop Choice in Rural Pakistan Saher Asad Lahore University of Management Sciences saher.asad@lums.edu.pk June 20, 2016 ABCDE 2016 Saher Asad (LUMS) Crop
More informationCLIMATE CHANGE AND U.S. AGRICULTURE: SOME FURTHER EVIDENCE. R. M. Adams Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon
CLIMATE CHANGE AND U.S. AGRICULTURE: SOME FURTHER EVIDENCE R. M. Adams Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon B. A. McCarl Texas A&M University College Station, Texas K. Segerson University of Connecticut
More informationIrrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water
DigitalCommons@ Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 1-1-1 Irrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water Richard T. Clark, rclark3@unl.edu Norman L.
More informationOverview of Statistics used in QbD Throughout the Product Lifecycle
Overview of Statistics used in QbD Throughout the Product Lifecycle August 2014 The Windshire Group, LLC Comprehensive CMC Consulting Presentation format and purpose Method name What it is used for and/or
More informationPeter H. Howard Institute for Policy Integrity, New York University School of Law and
Raising the Temperature on Food Prices: Climate Change, Food Security, and the Social Cost of Carbon Peter H. Howard Institute for Policy Integrity, New York University School of Law HowardP@exchange.law.nyu.edu
More informationTemperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century
Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation
More informationWhat does the introduction of energy crops mean for the crop mix and cellulosic ethanol plant location in Louisiana?
What does the introduction of energy crops mean for the crop mix and cellulosic ethanol plant location in Louisiana? Tyler Mark, Ph.D. Candidate Louisiana State University Graduate Student 215 Agricultural
More informationOn Technological Change in Crop Yields
On Technological Change in Crop Yields Tor Tolhurst & Alan P. Ker University of Guelph Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics Havlicek Memorial Seminar Department of Agricultural, Environmental,
More informationIFA Medium-Term Fertilizer Outlook
IFA Medium-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2015 2019 Olivier Rousseau IFA Secretariat Afcome 2015 Reims, France October 21 st - 23 rd 2015 Outlook for World Agriculture and Fertilizer Demand Economic and policy
More informationLivestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, 2008
Webcast Series June 20, 2008 Web Based Resources for Small Farms Mark Rice North Carolina State University Web Based Resources for Small Farms Small farm manure management poses different kinds of challenges
More informationEVALUATION OF ADAPT-N IN THE CORN BELT. Introduction
EVALUATION OF ADAPT-N IN THE CORN BELT C.A.M. Laboski 1, J.J. Camberato 2, and J.E. Sawyer 3 1 Univeristy of Wisconsin-Madison, 2 Purdue University, 3 Iowa State University Introduction Nitrogen is the
More informationDescribing DSTs Analytics techniques
Describing DSTs Analytics techniques This document presents more detailed notes on the DST process and Analytics techniques 23/03/2015 1 SEAMS Copyright The contents of this document are subject to copyright
More informationAnalysis & Comments. Livestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA. National Hay Situation and Outlook
Analysis & Comments Livestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA April 2, 2015 Letter #12 www.lmic.info National Hay Situation and Outlook The 2014 calendar
More informationMonitoring, Assessment, Prediction and Meteorological service of Agricultural Drought in China
Monitoring, Assessment, Prediction and Meteorological service of Agricultural Drought in China Wang Shili China Meteorological Administration January, 2005, Kobe Content Characteristics of agrometerological
More informationKansas Irrigated Agriculture s Impact on Value of Crop Production
Paper No. MC03-301 An ASAE Meeting Presentation Kansas Irrigated Agriculture s Impact on Value of Crop Production by Danny H. Rogers Professor Biological & Agricultural Engineering Department Kansas State
More informationLand Misallocation and Productivity
1/62 Land Misallocation and Productivity Diego Restuccia University of Toronto Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis Washington University in St. Louis Workshop on Macroeconomic Policy and Inequality Washington Sep.
More informationLand Application and Nutrient Management
MODULE D Land Application and Nutrient Management Figure 34-13. Relationship between the concentration of dissolved P in subsurface drainage from 30 cm deep lysimeters and the Mehlich-3 extractable soil
More informationJoint Research Centre (JRC)
Joint Research Centre (JRC) Marco Pastori and Faycal Bouraoui IES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability Ispra - Italy http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ CONTENT Introduction
More informationLIMITED IRRIGATION OF FOUR SUMMER CROPS IN WESTERN KANSAS. Alan Schlegel, Loyd Stone, and Troy Dumler Kansas State University SUMMARY
LIMITED IRRIGATION OF FOUR SUMMER CROPS IN WESTERN KANSAS Alan Schlegel, Loyd Stone, and Troy Dumler Kansas State University SUMMARY Research was initiated under sprinkler irrigation to evaluate limited
More informationWheat Yield Prediction using Weather based Statistical Model in Central Punjab
Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 157-162 (2015) Journal of Agricultural Physics ISSN 0973-032X http://www.agrophysics.in Research Article Wheat Yield Prediction using Weather based Statistical Model in Central Punjab
More informationWarming may create substantial water supply shortages in the Colorado River basin
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L22708, doi:10.1029/2007gl031764, 2007 BAK680 Warming may create substantial water supply shortages in the Colorado River basin Gregory
More informationAfrican Cities and The Structural Transformation: Evidence from Ghana and Ivory Coast
African Cities and The Structural Transformation: Evidence from Ghana and Ivory Coast Remi Jedwab Paris School of Economics & LSE ABCDE 2011 Conference, 01 June 2011. 1 / 33 Research Question Introduction
More informationAPPENDIX E. LESA Models
APPENDIX E LESA Models LESA ASSESSMENT CALEXICO SOLAR FARM I PHASE A PROJECT AREA CALEXICO SOLAR FARM I PHASE A PROJECT (SW/4 Section 13, S/2 Section 14, S/2 NE/4 Section 15, NW/4 Section 15, T17S, R13E,
More informationAlternative Livestock/Dryland Forage Systems in the Texas Panhandle
Alternative Livestock/Dryland Forage Systems in the Texas Panhandle David G. Lust Assistant Professor of Agriculture Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, WTAMU Box 60998, Canyon,
More informationThe impact of climate change on cereal yields: Statistical evidence from France
The impact of climate change on cereal yields: Statistical evidence from France Matthew Gammans *, Pierre Mérel * and Ariel Ortiz-Bobea * Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of
More informationA Länder-based Forecast of the 2017 German Bundestag Election
A Länder-based Forecast of the 2017 German Bundestag Election Mark A. Kayser 1 & Arndt Leininger 2 March 6, 2017 Abstract When elections are distant, polls are poor predictors. Too few voters are paying
More informationThe Water-Climate Nexus and Food Security in the Americas. Michael Clegg University of California, Irvine
The Water-Climate Nexus and Food Security in the Americas Michael Clegg University of California, Irvine The Global Challenge Global population is projected to increase by about 30% between now and 2050
More informationIowa Farm Outlook. February 2018 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Betting on the Come in the Fed Cattle Market
Iowa Farm Outlook 0BDepartment of Economics February 2018 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2094 Betting on the Come in the Fed Cattle Market Prices feedlot managers are bidding for feeder cattle suggest that feedlot
More informationA Statistical Analysis on Instability and Seasonal Component in the Price Series of Major Domestic Groundnut Markets in India
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-776 Volume 6 Number 11 (217) pp. 815-823 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/1.2546/ijcmas.217.611.96
More informationStated Preference (Conjoint) Market Research Data
Stated Preference (Conjoint) Market Research Data Data for Estimation of Choice Models Revealed Preferences (RP): observed or reported actual behavior Travel diaries Stated Preferences (SP): Response to
More informationA Parametric Bootstrapping Approach to Forecast Intermittent Demand
Proceedings of the 2008 Industrial Engineering Research Conference J. Fowler and S. Mason, eds. A Parametric Bootstrapping Approach to Forecast Intermittent Demand Vijith Varghese, Manuel Rossetti Department
More informationTesting for trend in the variability of monthly and seasonal temperature using the range and the standard deviation as measures of variability
Testing for trend in the variability of monthly and seasonal temperature using the range and the standard deviation as measures of variability T. Astatkie, Emmanuel K. Yiridoe and J. Stephen Clark T. Astatkie,
More informationComparing Consumptive Agricultural Water Use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis Comparing Consumptive Agricultural Water Use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta A Proof of Concept Using Remote Sensing Josué Medellín-Azuara
More informationDecentralization Without Representation (or Mobility): Implications for Rural Public Service Delivery
Decentralization Without Representation (or Mobility): Implications for Rural Public Service Delivery Tewodaj Mogues International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (Paper with Katrina Kosec, IFPRI)
More informationSolar Powered Water Lifting For Irrigation
Emerging practices from Agricultural Water Management in Africa and the Near East Thematic Workshop Theme 7 Solar Powered Water Lifting For Irrigation Ahmed Abdelfattah International consultant / solar
More informationLeveraging Smart Meter Data & Expanding Services BY ELLEN FRANCONI, PH.D., BEMP, MEMBER ASHRAE; DAVID JUMP, PH.D., P.E.
ASHRAE www.ashrae.org. Used with permission from ASHRAE Journal. This article may not be copied nor distributed in either paper or digital form without ASHRAE s permission. For more information about ASHRAE,
More informationRice or riots: On food production and conflict severity across India
Supplementary material for Rice or riots: On food production and conflict severity across India Gerdis Wischnath a & Halvard Buhaug a,b* a Peace Research Institute Oslo, PRIO PO Box 9229 Grønland, 0134
More informationUsing precision agriculture technologies for phosphorus, potassium, and lime management with lower grain prices and to improve water quality
214 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State niversity 137 sing precision agriculture technologies for phosphorus, potassium, and lime management with lower grain prices and to improve water
More informationESTIMATING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY: BIASES DUE TO OMISSION OF GENDER-INFLUENCED VARIABLES AND ENDOGENEITY OF REGRESSORS
ESTIMATING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY: BIASES DUE TO OMISSION OF GENDER-INFLUENCED VARIABLES AND ENDOGENEITY OF REGRESSORS by Nina Lilja, Thomas F. Randolph and Abrahmane Diallo* Selected
More informationfrom agriculture PhD Candidate, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University 2 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University
Agricultural practices adjustments to policies aiming to decrease water pollution from agriculture Shanxia Sun 1, Michael Delgado 2, Juan Sesmero 3 1 PhD Candidate, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University
More informationIMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS Theo Gunther Resource Management Specialist-Env. Programs Peter Kyveryga PhD. Director of Analytics - ISA Crop Yield and Nitrogen Loss effect of Rye can
More informationAgriculture Sector Analysis
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Dissemination Note Series Romania: Toward a Low Carbon and Climate Resilient Economy
More informationEconomic Comparison of SDI and Center Pivots for Various Field Sizes
Economic Comparison of SDI and Center Pivots for Various Field Sizes Daniel O Brien Extension Agricultural Economist Northwest Research and Extension Center Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) systems are
More informationEstimating the drivers of regional rural land use change in New Zealand
Estimating the drivers of regional rural land use change in New Zealand Suzi Kerr, Jo Hendy, Kelly Lock and Yun Liang Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, PO Box 24390, Manners Street, 6142, Wellington
More informationFROM: Dan Rubado, Evaluation Project Manager, Energy Trust of Oregon; Phil Degens, Evaluation Manager, Energy Trust of Oregon
September 2, 2015 MEMO FROM: Dan Rubado, Evaluation Project Manager, Energy Trust of Oregon; Phil Degens, Evaluation Manager, Energy Trust of Oregon TO: Marshall Johnson, Sr. Program Manager, Energy Trust
More informationElectricity Generation and Water- Related Constraints: An Empirical Analysis of Four Southeastern States
Electricity Generation and Water- Related Constraints: An Empirical Analysis of Four Southeastern States Gbadebo Oladosu, Stan Hadley, D.P. Vogt, and T.J. Wilbanks Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
More informationEconomics of Precision Farming
Economics of Precision Farming Marvin Batte VanBuren Professor Emeritus, OSU Research Professor, University of Kentucky Florian Diekmann Assistant Professor University Libraries, OSU What is Precision
More informationNATIONAL AND REGIONAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE INDIAN ECONOMY
NATIONAL AND REGIONAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE INDIAN ECONOMY PARTHA SEN and SHREEKANT GUPTA Delhi School of Economics University of Delhi sgupta@econdse.org Climate Change and Developing Countries
More informationAsian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. Analysis of Rice Production Instability in Southeast Asian Countries
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development journal homepage: http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5005 Analysis of Rice Production Instability in Southeast Asian Countries Mamma Sawaneh Department
More informationWheat production in Saudi Arabia between feasibility and efficiency
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS ELSEVIER Agricultural Economics 16 (1997) 35-45 Wheat production in Saudi Arabia between feasibility and efficiency K.A. Al-Hamoudi a,*, Sherin A. Sherif b' B.E. Sofian a a Department
More informationDelaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com
IHS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com Overview of Findings Delmarva Freight Summit June 24 th,
More informationWeather Shocks, Maize Yields and Adaptation in Rural China Ma Jiliang and Jean-François Maystadt
Economics Working Paper Series 2016/001 Weather Shocks, Maize Yields and Adaptation in Rural China Ma Jiliang and Jean-François Maystadt The Department of Economics Lancaster University Management School
More informationHog:Corn Ratio What can we learn from the old school?
October 16, 2006 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 1944 Hog:Corn Ratio What can we learn from the old school? Economists have studied the hog to corn ratio for over 100 years. This ratio is simply the live hog price
More informationRising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest
Rising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest M A R C F. B E L L E M A R E W A T E R A N D C L I M A T E C H A N G E I N A F R I C A C O N F E R E N C E D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y M A R
More informationCrop Loss Assessment (last lecture)
Crop Loss Assessment (last lecture) Review: Concepts of epidemics Measurement of disease intensity Modeling of disease intensity (general issues) Temporal analysis of epidemics One variable processes (Y
More informationProceedings of Indiana Crop Adviser Conference 2004
FORMULATING N RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORN IN THE CORN BELT USING RECENT DATA Emerson D. Nafziger, John E. Sawyer, and Robert G. Hoeft - University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois and Iowa State University,
More informationGrain Market Outlook for
Grain Market Outlook for 2017-2018 KSU Ag Econ 520 Fall 2017 Manhattan, Kansas DANIEL O BRIEN EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIST Topics to be discussed.. 1) Grain Market Analysis & Outlook Corn & Grain Sorghum
More informationNitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana
Purdue University Department of Agronomy Applied Crop Research Update Updated March 2017 URL: http://www.kingcorn.org/news/timeless/nitrogenmgmt.pdf Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana Jim
More information