Milk Production. January Milk Production up 1.8 Percent
|
|
- Kristin Snow
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Milk Production ISSN: Released February, 08, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). January Milk Production up.8 Percent Milk production in the 3 major States during January totaled 7.3 billion pounds, up.8 percent from January 07. December revised production, at 7.0 billion pounds, was up. percent from December 06. The December revision represented an increase of 4 million pounds or less than 0. percent from last month's preliminary production estimate. Production per cow in the 3 major States averaged,979 pounds for January, 4 pounds above January 07. This is the highest production per cow for the month of January since the 3 State series began in 003. The number of milk cows on farms in the 3 major States was 8.74 million head, 49,000 head more than January 07, and 4,000 head more than December Annual Milk Production up.4 Percent from 06 The annual production of milk for the United States during 07 was 5 billion pounds,.4 percent above 06. Revisions to 06 production decreased the annual total 3 million pounds. Revised 07 production was up 35 million pounds from last month's publication. Annual total milk production has increased 3.4 percent from 008. Production per cow in the United States averaged, pounds for 07, 63 pounds above 06. The average annual rate of milk production per cow has increased.5 percent from 008. The average number of milk cows on farms in the United States during 07 was 9.39 million head, up 0.7 percent from 06. The average number of milk cows was unrevised for 07. The average annual number of milk cows has increased percent from 008.
2 This page intentionally left blank Milk Production (February 08)
3 Contents Milk Cows and Production by Quarter United States: Milk Cows and Production by Month 3 Selected States: Estimated Milk Cows and Production by Month United States: Milk Cows and Production 3 Selected States: January 07 and Monthly Milk Production 3 Selected States... 5 Milk Cows and Production 3 Selected States: December 06 and Monthly Milk Cows 3 Selected States... 6 Milk Cows and Production United States: Milk Production United States: Milk Cows and Production States and United States: 06 and Milk Cows United States: Rate per Cow United States: Milk Cows by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Cows by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Produced per Cow by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Produced per Cow by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Production by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Production by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: Milk Cows and Production by Quarter States and United States: Milk Cows and Production by Quarter States and United States: Licensed Dairy Herds States and United States: 06 and Statistical Methodology... 9 Reliability of Monthly Milk Production Estimates... 9 Information Contacts... 0 Milk Production (February 08) 3
4 Milk Cows and Production by Quarter United States: [May not add due to rounding. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun] Quarter January-March... April-June... July-September... October-December... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 07 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 9,369 9,399 9,40 9,398 5,77 5,888 5,6 5,649 53,56 55,344 53,473 53,0 Annual... 9,39 Includes dry cows. Excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves., 5,466 Milk Cows and Production by Month 3 Selected States: [May not add due to rounding. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun] Month January... February... March... April... May... June... July... August... September... October... November... December... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 07 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 8,69 8,696 8,74 8,7 8,730 8,733 8,734 8,74 8,737 8,73 8,734 8,736 8,740,955,799,06,97,037,,97,6,850,,859,3,979 6,9 5,645 7,564 7,00 7,783 6,7 7,4 7,04 6,6 6,70 6,35 6,978 7,.8 Annual... 8,75 Includes dry cows. Excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 3,04 0,455 Estimated Milk Cows and Production by Month United States: [May not add due to rounding. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun] Month January... February... March... April... May... June... July... August... September... October... November... December... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 07 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 9,359 9,365 9,383 9,39 9,40 9,404 9,404 9,404 9,399 9,395 9,398 9,400 9,405,7,783,997,95,06,90,3,99,85,89,837,9,96 8,8 6,6 8,740 8,33 8,95 8,060 8,68 8,049 7,56 7,769 7,60 8,058 8,450.8 Annual... 9,39 Includes dry cows. Excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves., 5,466 4 Milk Production (February 08)
5 Milk Cows and Production 3 Selected States: January 07 and 08 [May not add due to rounding] Arizona... California... Colorado... Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Iowa... Kansas... Michigan... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 07 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 98, , ,45,5,75,850,995,765,0,000,5,90,40,005,30,800,030,800,5,05,975, , , ,4 37 3, Minnesota... New Mexico... New York... Ohio... Oregon... Pennsylvania... South Dakota... Texas... Utah... Vermont ,805,090,030,790,685,765,880,05,905,805,840,35,950,800,700,790,885,045,5, , , , Virginia... Washington... Wisconsin... 75,80 75,75,700,960,980,700,000, , , State Total... 8,69 - Represents zero. Includes dry cows. Excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 8,740,955,979 6,9 7,.8 Monthly Milk Production 3 Selected States Million pounds 8,000 7,500 7,000 6,500 6,000 5, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Milk Production (February 08) 5
6 Milk Cows and Production 3 Selected States: December 06 and 07 State Arizona... California... Colorado... Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Iowa... Kansas... Michigan... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 06 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 96, , ,80,95,80,70,05,730,890,980,95,40,0,5,5,675,00,770,900,00,965, , , , , Minnesota... New Mexico... New York... Ohio... Oregon... Pennsylvania... South Dakota... Texas... Utah... Vermont ,770,055,00,770,670,735,5,5,90,785,80,075,950,740,675,735,865,000,5, , , , Virginia... Washington... Wisconsin ,79 74,76,640,990,960,680,975, , , State Total... 8,683 - Represents zero. Includes dry cows. Excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 8,736,3,3 6,788 6,978. Monthly Milk Cows 3 Selected States Thousand head 8,745 8,735 8,75 8,75 8,705 8,695 8, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6 Milk Production (February 08)
7 Milk Cows and Production United States: [May not add due to rounding] Year Milk cows Production per cow Milk production Milk Total (,000 head) (pounds) (million pounds) 9,34 9,0 9,3 9,99 9,37 9,4 9,57 9,34 9,35 9,39 Average number during year, excluding heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 0,397 0,56,4,334,7,86,59,396,778, 89,978 89,0 9,7 96,55 00,64 0,3 06,054 08,597,405 5,466 Milk Production United States: Million pounds 0,000 5,000 3% Increase over the past 0-year period 0,000 05,000 00,000 95,000 90,000 85, Milk Production (February 08) 7
8 Milk Cows and Production States and United States: 06 and 07 [May not add due to rounding] Alabama... Alaska... Arizona... Arkansas... California... Colorado... Connecticut... Delaware... Florida... Georgia... Milk cows Milk per cow Milk production Change from 06 (,000 head) (,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) 7.0 9, , ,43,667 4,679 3,333,968 5,9,56 9,00 0,85,786 4,833 9,667 4,680 3,67,755 6,8,05 8,560 0,9, , , , ,49, , , , ,49, Hawaii... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Iowa... Kansas... Kentucky... Louisiana... Maine... Maryland ,54 4,647 0,340,57 3,634,80 8,05 4,083,000 9,8 6,93 4,378 0,74,80 3,75 3,000 8,589 3,333,000 9, ,66,9.0 4,53.0 5, ,39.0, ,67.0,99.0 4,64.0 5,7.0 3,49, Massachusetts.. Michigan... Minnesota... Mississippi... Missouri... Montana... Nebraska... Nevada... New Hampshire New Jersey ,47 5,957 0,967 4,400 4,84,07 3,37,000 0,500 7,49 7,583 6,30,537 5, 4,588,54 4,067,56,000 9, , 9, ,60.0 9, ,3.0 9, , , New Mexico... New York... North Carolina... North Dakota... Ohio... Oklahoma... Oregon... Pennsylvania... Rhode Island... South Carolina ,479 3,834 0,978,500 0,6 8,703 0,744 0,454 7,65 6,667 4,960 3,6,56,563,59 8,667 0,395 0,834 6,50 6,467 7,7.0 4, , , 0, ,.0 4, , ,59.0 0, South Dakota... Tennessee... Texas... Utah... Vermont... Virginia... Washington... West Virginia... Wisconsin... Wyoming , ,78.0,39 6,57,680,77 0,977 9,44 4,0 4,889 3,54 3,300,376 7,35 3,589 3,36,47 9,954 3,88 5,5 3,75 3,033, ,773.0,09,77.0,73.0 6, , , ,054.0,,78.0,73 6, , United States... 9,3 9,39.0,778,,40 5, Represents zero. Average number during year, excluding heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 8 Milk Production (February 08)
9 Milk Cows United States: Thousand head 9,400 9,350 % Increase over the past 0-year period 9,300 9,50 9,00 9,50 9, Rate per Cow United States: Pounds 3,000,500 % Increase over the past 0-year period,000,500,000 0,500 0, Milk Production (February 08) 9
10 Milk Cows by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 06 [Includes dry cows, excludes heifers not yet fresh] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 95, , , , , , Oregon... Texas Virginia... Washington , , , , , ,78 3-State total... 8,6 8,68 8,637 8,638 8,64 8,648 United States... 9,30 9,308 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... 9,38 9,38 9,39 9,34 Annual average (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 96, , , , , , , Oregon... Texas Virginia... Washington , , , , , , ,79 3-State Total... 8,659 8,667 8,665 8,668 8,675 8,683 8,653 United States... 9,37 9,33 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total. Average based on monthly totals. 9,39 9,33 9,34 9,35 9,35 0 Milk Production (February 08)
11 Milk Cows by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 07 [Includes dry cows, excludes heifers not yet fresh] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 98, , , , , , Oregon... Texas Virginia... Washington... 75,80 74,80 73,80 73,79 73,79 73,78 3-State total... 8,69 8,696 8,74 8,7 8,730 8,733 United States... 9,359 9,365 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... 9,383 9,39 9,40 9,404 Annual average (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 04, , , , , , , Oregon... Texas Virginia... Washington... 75,78 75,78 74,77 74,77 74,77 74,76 74,78 3-State total... 8,734 8,74 8,737 8,73 8,734 8,736 8,75 United States... 9,404 9,404 9,399 9,395 9,398 9,400 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total. Average based on monthly totals. 9,39 Milk Production (February 08)
12 Milk Produced per Cow by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 06 [Excludes milk sucked by calves] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds),0,0,60,80,005,745,95,985,905,70,095,865,050,75,90,660,85,0,830,050,60,040,5,895,075,830,960,045,990,0,60,970,55,855,05,780,90,990,0,65,0,05,00,0,5,80,965,075,970,85,030,905,40,730,090,700,830,965,855,00 Oregon... Texas...,770,900,960,765,70,75,890,835,845,755,680,900,850,640,650,630,770,85,75,655,80,40,000,790,800,770,890,990,95,785,760,0,970,770,760,745,840,955,885,740,835,95,085,830,85,805,95,975,990,80,755,045,00,750,760,70,80,860,970,750 Virginia... Washington...,645,005,965,565,90,855,695,065,000,665,00,965,705,080,065,590,00,985 3-State total...,90,834,995,7,09,96 United States...,90,85 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas...,975,97,997 Annual average (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds),0,90,5,645,65,660,0,985,880,0,880,0,5,585,55,65,0,970,905,80,85,805,0,450,045,585,805,880,835,085,0,880,75,475,065,635,880,955,95,40,00,830,30,595,970,630,85,905,890,085,80,95,80,70,05,730,890,980,95,40,906 4,679,968 5,9 0,85 4,647 0,340,57 3,634,80 5,957 Oregon... Texas...,765,080,050,770,785,70,0,860,970,770,745,085,05,730,745,675,880,895,960,745,670,965,950,675,690,630,800,790,900,690,70,05,000,750,695,695,0,885,955,750,690,980,95,75,65,640,80,5,5,700,770,055,00,770,670,735,5,5,90,785 0,967 4,479 3,834 0,6 0,744 0,454,39,680,77 0,977 Virginia... Washington...,585,080,00,540,065,990,50,985,90,585,005,950,535,95,895,640,990,960 9,44 4,0 3,54 3-State total...,8,9,845,904,856,3 3,049 United States...,99,895,80,88,833,909 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total.,778 Milk Production (February 08)
13 Milk Produced per Cow by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 07 [Excludes milk sucked by calves] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds),45,5,75,850,995,765,0,000,5,90,050,780,005,730,800,640,780,830,805,030,85,995,35,95,05,860,995,045,030,65,05,960,65,830,000,80,955,995,955,5,40,005,5,865,30,860,055,055,0,35,080,880,70,75,090,70,905,975,865,0 Oregon... Texas...,805,090,030,790,685,765,880,05,905,805,660,960,860,640,555,635,75,860,730,645,855,0,055,865,775,840,95,00,950,80,80,50,035,835,75,805,855,00,0,785,0,0,0,905,790,855,95,075,040,855,805,095,00,785,740,75,840,975,000,765 Virginia... Washington...,700,960,980,585,795,80,795,00,030,765,990,985,775,080,050,65,05,980 3-State total...,955,799,06,97,037, United States...,7,783 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas...,997,95,06 Annual average (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) (pounds),975,0,55,645,60,690,0,005,90,55,890,0,50,555,55,675,0,00,90,30,80,760,35,400,05,,80,95,880,00,90,0,75,460,045,680,90,995,5,85,960,85,35,55,955,670,855,5,880,5,0,5,5,675,00,770,900,00,965,80,90 4,680,755 6,8 0,9 4,378 0,74,80 3,75 3,000 6,30 Oregon... Texas...,835,5,045,790,755,730,905,990,030,800,830,065,05,790,735,75,95,950,00,775,740,965,95,70,675,655,80,855,90,70,790,000,980,745,700,700,0,890,0,765,75,985,895,675,60,660,795,890,880,705,80,075,950,740,675,735,865,000,5,775,537 4,960 3,6,59 0,395 0,834,376 3,589 3,36,47 Virginia... Washington...,605,070,05,60,050,05,580,965,0,630,995,995,60,900,90,680,975,990 9,954 3,88 3,75 3-State total...,97,6,850,,859,3 3,04 United States...,3,99,85,89,837,9 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total., Milk Production (February 08) 3
14 Milk Production by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 06 [Excludes milk sucked by calves] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) 4 3, , , , , , , , , , ,359 3, Oregon... Texas , , , , , , Virginia... Washington , , , , , ,537 3-State total... 6,553 5,8 7,7 6,80 7,44 6,660 United States... 7,679 6,898 8,399 7,95 8,6 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... Annual total 7,773 (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) 380 3, , , , , , , , ,5 38, , , ,837 40,469 3,95,495 4,665,9 4,53 5,034 3,39 0,6 Oregon... Texas , , , , , , ,666 7,7 4,777 5,548,5 0,80,546 0,773,095,77 Virginia... Washington , , , , , ,507,73 6,650 30,0 3-State total... 6,864 6,659 5,99 6,504 6,05 6,788 99,434 United States... 7,90 7,684 6,977 7,550 7,6 7,853 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total. Total milk production for year.,405 4 Milk Production (February 08)
15 Milk Production by Month 3 Selected States, 3 State Total, and United States: 07 [Excludes milk sucked by calves] State January February March April May June Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) 45 3, , , 33 3, , , , , , , , , Oregon... Texas , , , , , , , , , , Virginia... Washington , , , , , ,530 3-State total... 6,9 5,645 7,564 7,00 7,783 6,7 United States... 8,8 6,6 8,740 8,33 8,95 State July August September October November December Florida... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Kansas... Annual total 8,060 (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) 403 3, , ,65 36, , , , , , , , , ,00 39,798 4,89,496 4,67,99 4,64 5,7 3,496,3 Oregon... Texas , , , , , , , , , ,864 8, 4,9 5,59,59 0,8,68,054,5,78 Virginia... Washington , , , , , ,539,736 6,56 30,30 3-State total... 7,4 7,04 6,6 6,70 6,35 6,978 0,455 United States... 8,68 8,049 7,56 7,769 7,60 8,058 United States monthly estimates are derived by proportionally allocating the quarterly estimates using the 3-state monthly total. Total milk production for year. 5,466 Milk Production (February 08) 5
16 Milk Cows and Production by Quarter States and United States: 06 [May not add due to rounding] State Alabama... Alaska... Arizona... Arkansas... California... Colorado... Connecticut... Delaware... Florida... Georgia... Milk cows Milk production Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 7.0 9, , , , (million pounds), , (million pounds) 0.9, , (million pounds) , ,84.0, (million pounds).0 0.9, , Hawaii... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Iowa... Kansas... Kentucky... Louisiana... Maine... Maryland ,5 49.0,047.0, , ,0, , ,00.0, ,6 46,034.0, Massachusetts... Michigan... Minnesota... Mississippi... Missouri... Montana... Nebraska... Nevada... New Hampshire... New Jersey ,669.0, ,780.0, ,73.0, ,69, New Mexico... New York... North Carolina... North Dakota... Ohio... Oklahoma... Oregon... Pennsylvania... Rhode Island... South Carolina ,84 3, , , , , , , ,7.0 3, , , , , , , South Dakota... Tennessee... Texas... Utah... Vermont... Virginia... Washington... West Virginia... Wisconsin... Wyoming , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , United States... 9, , 9,39.0 9,34.0 5,97 54, , ,59.0 Quarterly average includes dry cows, excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. 6 Milk Production (February 08)
17 Milk Cows and Production by Quarter States and United States: 07 [May not add due to rounding] State Alabama... Alaska... Arizona... Arkansas... California... Colorado... Connecticut... Delaware... Florida... Georgia... Milk cows Milk production Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 00.0, , , , (million pounds) 0.9, ,038.0, (million pounds) 0.7, ,43.0, (million pounds) , ,708.0, (million pounds) , ,809.0, Hawaii... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana... Iowa... Kansas... Kentucky... Louisiana... Maine... Maryland , ,06.0, ,7 50.0,04.0, , ,040.0, ,60 47,059.0, Massachusetts... Michigan... Minnesota... Mississippi... Missouri... Montana... Nebraska... Nevada... New Hampshire... New Jersey ,757.0, ,8, ,8, ,773.0, New Mexico... New York... North Carolina... North Dakota... Ohio... Oklahoma... Oregon... Pennsylvania... Rhode Island... South Carolina ,04.0 3, , , ,8.0 3, , , , , , , ,00.0 3, , , South Dakota... Tennessee... Texas... Utah... Vermont... Virginia... Washington... West Virginia... Wisconsin... Wyoming , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , United States... 9, , ,40.0 9, , , , ,0.0 Quarterly average includes dry cows, excludes heifers not yet fresh. Excludes milk sucked by calves. Milk Production (February 08) 7
18 Licensed Dairy Herds States and United States: 06 and 07 Alabama... Alaska Arkansas Connecticut... Delaware... Florida... Georgia... Licensed dairy herds (number) , (number) , Hawaii... Idaho... Illinois... Indiana Kansas... Kentucky... Louisiana... Maine... Maryland... Massachusetts Mississippi... Missouri... Montana... Nebraska... Nevada... New Hampshire... New Jersey North Carolina... North Dakota Oklahoma... Oregon... Pennsylvania... Rhode Island... South Carolina Tennessee... Texas Virginia... Washington... West Virginia Wyoming... United States ,45, ,80 3,350 75, , , , ,50 0 4, ,070, ,750 3,0 70, , , , , ,9 Average number of dairy farms licensed to sell milk, based on counts collected from State and other regulatory agencies. Licensed dairy herd estimates based on brucellosis test counts provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. 8 Milk Production (February 08)
19 Statistical Methodology Survey Procedures: Primary data used to determine these estimates were obtained from a sample of producers. Individual States maintain a list of all known milk producers and information on the size of their herd. States use all known sources of producers to ensure that their lists are as complete as possible. Generally, all large producers and a sample of small producers are included in the survey. Questionnaires are mailed to producers near the end of the month to obtain data for the first day of the month. Additional reports are obtained by telephone, as needed, to supplement the mail response. Where feasible, States utilize state and federal administrative data to estimate milk production. This eliminates duplication of data gathering by different government agencies such as Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Dairy Market News. Indications of milk cow inventory are also obtained in the January Cattle Survey. Estimation Procedures: Regional Field Offices prepare these estimates by using a combination of survey indications, historic trends, and any available administrative data. Individual State estimates are reviewed by the Agricultural Statistics Board for reasonableness. Revision Policy: Milk production, milk per cow, and number of milk cows are subject to revision the following month after initial publication for monthly States or the following quarter for the quarterly States. Normally, administrative data from Federal Market Orders, State Departments of Agriculture, or other sources are the main basis for revisions. However, administrative data for all States may not be available in time for these revisions. Estimates are again subject to revisions in February each year based on additional administrative data. In the event that additional changes are necessary, a third revision is possible in February the following year. Estimates are again reviewed after data from the five-year Census of Agriculture are available. No revisions are made after that date. Reliability: Since all operations with dairy animals are not included in the sample, survey estimates are subject to sampling variability. Survey results are also subject to non-sampling errors such as omissions, duplications, and mistakes in reporting, recording, and processing the data. The effects of these errors cannot be measured directly. They are minimized through rigid quality controls in the data collection process and through a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness. To assist users in evaluating the reliability of the estimates in this report, the "Root Mean Square Error" is shown for selected items in the table below. The "Root Mean Square Error" is a statistical measure based on past performance and is computed using the differences between first and final estimates. The "Root Mean Square Error" for the 3 State milk production estimates over the past 4 months is 0. percent. This means that chances are out of 3 that the final estimate will not be above or below the current estimate of 7.3 billion pounds by more than 0. percent. Chances are 9 out of 0 that the difference will not exceed 0. percent. Reliability of Monthly Milk Production Estimates [Based on data for the past 4 months] Item Root mean square error 90 percent confidence level Difference between first and latest estimate Average Smallest Largest Below latest Months Above latest (percent) (percent) (,000) (,000) (,000) (number) (number) Milk production All Milk cows Milk Production (February 08) 9
20 Information Contacts Listed below are the commodity specialists in the Livestock Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. inquiries may be sent to Travis Averill, Chief, Livestock Branch... (0) Scott Hollis, Head, Livestock Section... (0) Sherry Bertramsen Livestock Slaughter... (0) Donnie Fike Dairy Products... (0) Heidi Gleich Cattle, Cattle on Feed... (0) Mike Miller Milk Production and Milk Cows... (0) Seth Riggins Hogs and Pigs... (0) Vacant Sheep and Goats... (0) Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways: All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: Both national and state specific reports are available via a free subscription. To set-up this free subscription, visit and click on National or State in upper right corner above search box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive. For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) , 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at or at any USDA office, or call (866) to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C , by fax (0) or at program.intake@usda.gov.
21 USDA NASS Data Users Meeting Tuesday, April 4, 08 University of Chicago Gleacher Center 450 North Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, Illinois USDA s National Agricultural Statistics Service will hold an open forum for users of U.S. domestic and international agriculture data. NASS is organizing the 08 Data Users Meeting in cooperation with five other USDA agencies Agricultural Marketing Service, Economic Research Service, Farm Service Agency, Foreign Agricultural Service, and World Agricultural Outlook Board and the Census Bureau s Foreign Trade Division. Agency representatives will provide updates on recent and pending changes in statistical and information programs important to agriculture, answer questions, and welcome comments and input from data users. For registration details or additional information about the Data Users Meeting, see the meeting page on the NASS website ( Or contact Tina Hall (NASS) at or at tina.hall@nass.usda.gov or Patricia Snipe (NASS) at or at patricia.snipe@nass.usda.gov. The Data Users Meeting precedes the Industry Outlook Conference at the same location on Wednesday, April 5, 08. The outlook meeting brings together analysts from various commodity sectors to discuss developments and trends. For registration details or additional information about the Industry Outlook Conference, see the conference page on the LMIC website ( or contact James Robb at
Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent
Milk Production ISSN: 9-557 Released February, 07, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). January Milk Production
More informationSteers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.
Cattle ISSN: 1948-90 Released January 31, 2018, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). January 1 Cattle Inventory
More informationGrain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 32 Percent from September 2016 Soybean Stocks Up 53 Percent All Wheat Stocks Down 11 Percent
Grain Stocks ISSN: 949-095 Released September 9, 07, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Stocks Up 3 Percent
More informationFlour Milling Products
Flour Milling Products ISSN: 2378-2498 Released February 1, 2018, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
More informationApples had the highest total value of pollination of crops reported in Region 5 during in The price per colony
Cost of Pollination ISSN: 475-435 Released December, 07, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Cost per
More informationFacts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service May 2009 Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing Incorporating Data from the 2007 Census of Agriculture Written by: Adam Diamond
More informationLand Values and Cash Rents
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Land Values and Cash Rents 2009 Summary August 2009 ISSN: 19491867 Contents Agricultural Land Values Highlights... 4 U.
More informationCALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2013
Food and Nutrition Service January 2015 CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2013 Introduction The Program Access Index (PAI)
More informationSmall Grains 2017 Summary
United s Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Small Grains 7 Summary September 7 ISSN: 9962X All wheat production totaled.7 billion bushels in 7, down percent from the revised
More informationAsphalt Pavement Mix Production Survey On Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement, Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles, And Warm-mix Asphalt Usage:
Asphalt Pavement Mix Production Survey On Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement, Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles, And Warm-mix Asphalt Usage: 2009-2010 Appendix A Purpose The National Asphalt Pavement Association is working
More informationPuerto Rico - Various
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Puerto Rico Various Agricultural Statistics 2011 Summary April 2012 ISSN: 21548692 Summary Milk production decreased 1
More informationGrain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2017 Summary
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production Summary ISSN: 2470-9913 March 2018 Grain Crushings and Co-Products Production
More informationTrends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: July 2012
Trends in U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: 2004-2011 July 2012 By Teresa Foster, William Briggs and Leslie Glustrom Version 1.1 Inquiries or corrections to info@cleanenergyaction.org 1 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...
More informationCorn Objective Yield Survey Data,
Washington, D.C. Corn Objective Yield Survey Data, 1992-2006 Released May 18, 2007, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Ty Kalaus
More informationGrain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2016 Summary
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production Summary ISSN: 2470-9913 March 2017 Grain Crushings and Co-Products Production
More informationKnowledge Exchange Report. Economic Impact of Mandatory Overtime on New York State Agriculture
Farm Credit East Knowledge Exchange Report September, 2014 Economic Impact of Mandatory Overtime on New York State Agriculture The New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo are considering legislation
More informationElectronic Check Service Quick Reference Guide
Electronic Check Service Quick Reference Guide VeriFone Omni & Vx Series Using the RDM EC6000i VeriFone Omni & Vx Series Using the RDM EC6000i Image Settlement/Upload Check images are settled/uploaded
More informationCrop Production ISSN:
Crop Production ISSN: 1936-3737 Released August 12, 2014, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Production
More informationSUBJECT: Request for Input from Livestock Producer Groups
United States Department of Agriculture Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services Risk Management Agency May 14, 2001 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: R&D-01-023 TO: FROM: Livestock Producer Groups All Risk Management
More informationNEAUPG Annual Fall Meeting
NEAUPG Annual Fall Meeting 1 Presentation Overview What does it mean to be Sustainable? What asphalt technologies are considered Sustainable and why? Why do we need to quantify our impact? What tools are
More informationThe Clean Power Plan NJ Clean Air Council Meeting
M.J. Bradley & Associates The Clean Power Plan NJ Clean Air Council Meeting D E C E M B E R 9, 2 0 1 5 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Chris Van Atten vanatten@mjbradley.com (978) 369 5533 / www.mjbradley.com
More informationU.S. Census Bureau Lumber Production and Mill Stocks MA321T(07) Issued May 2008
U.S. Census Bureau Lumber Production and Mill Stocks - 2007 MA321T(07) Issued May 2008 Address inquiries concerning these data to Primary Goods Industries Branch, U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau,
More informationInternet Appendix for The Impact of Bank Credit on Labor Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Internet Appendix for The Impact of Bank Credit on Labor Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity John (Jianqiu) Bai, Daniel Carvalho and Gordon Phillips * June 4, 2017 This appendix contains three
More informationFatal Occupational Injuries in Maine, 2008
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Fatal Occupational Injuries in Maine, 2008 An Annual Report September 2009 By: Ann Beaulieu D EPARTMENT OF L ABOR B UREAU OF L ABOR STANDARDS 45 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE
More information1/te,. I FARM INCOME SITUATION
April 1961 1/te,. I FARM INCOME SITUATION FIS-182 FOR RELEASE APR. 25, P.M. I j h c: I I j i FARM INCOME IN 1961 Farm operators' realized net income in 1961 will be up from 1960, by a billion dollars or
More informationFarm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc.
Farm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter 2015 Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc. TAKE A PICTURE OF THE RADIO YOU LISTEN TO THE MOST OFTEN? 2 Radio Is An Important Part Of Farmers And Ranchers Day I started
More informationIndustrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region
Industrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region Garrett Shields and Robert D. Naranjo, BCS Incorporated Sandy Glatt, U.S. Department of Energy ABSTRACT The energy intensity of specific manufacturing
More informationU.S. Political Activity & Public Policy Report 2012
U.S. Political Activity & Public Policy Report 2012 Best Buy Co., Inc. 2012 Best Buy engages in the political process by developing and advocating public policy positions that directly impact our employees,
More informationUpdated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation
Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation 1998-2000 Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Energy Information Administration
More informationQ October-December. Jobs Outlook Survey Report. Published by the Society for Human Resource Management
Q4 2013 October-December Jobs Outlook Survey Report Published by the Society for Human Resource Management JOBS OUTLOOK SURVEY REPORT Q4 2013 (October-December) OPTIMISM ABOUT JOB GROWTH IN Q4 2013 (OCTOBER-DECEMBER)
More informationThe Denver Water System
The Denver Water System Established in 1918 Unique structure Serves 1.3 million people 25% of Colorado s population System footprint - 4,000 square miles (2.5 million acres) 19 raw water reservoirs Critical
More information130 Million Reasons to Develop a Green Workforce
130 Million Reasons to Develop a Green Workforce An Overview of the BPI Credentialing Process Larry Zarker Building Performance Institute Home Performance Contracting is the Low Hanging Fruit in the Clean
More informationSurvey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete
Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete A survey of concrete producers to quantify the use of cement, admixtures and blended cements in ready mixed concrete. October 2000
More informationCitrus Fruits 2015 Summary
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Citrus Fruits 2015 Summary September 2015 ISSN: 1948-9048 Contents Utilized Citrus Production United States: 2005-2015...
More informationU.S. Political Activity & Public Policy Report 2011
U.S. Political Activity & Public Policy Report 2011 Best Buy Co., Inc. 2011 Best Buy engages in the political process by developing and advocating public policy positions which directly impact our employees,
More informationA Model Modernization: Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building and GSA s Mid-Century Inventory
A Model Modernization: Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building and GSA s Mid-Century Inventory Leslie Shepherd, Chief Architect, General Services Administration Les Shepherd, FAIA Chief Architect General
More informationQ October-December. Jobs Outlook Survey Report. Published by the Society for Human Resource Management
Q4 2012 October-December Jobs Outlook Survey Report Published by the Society for Human Resource Management JOBS OUTLOOK SURVEY REPORT Q4 2012 (October-December) OPTIMISM ABOUT JOB GROWTH IN Q4 2012 (OCTOBER-DECEMBER)
More informationPotential Impacts to Texas of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Brian Tulloh Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015
Potential Impacts to Texas of EPA s Clean Power Plan Brian Tulloh Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015 Luminant Is Texas Largest Competitive Power Generator 15.4 GW of generation capacity: 8.0 GW
More informationPocket Planners :00am - 4:30pm Eastern Time
CUSTOMIZED Calendars GORDON BERNARD COMPANY, LLC SINCE 1949 Gordon Bernard Company Customer Service 1.800.531.1484 8:00am - 4:30pm Eastern Time Pocket Planners A Gordon Bernard Company Pocket Planner is
More informationMARKETING AND POLICY BRIEFING PAPER
MARKETING AND POLICY BRIEFING PAPER Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison Cooperative Extension, University of Wisconsin-Extension
More informationStates Use Gentle Hand in Taxing Timberland
March 2009 No. 164 FISCAL FACT States Use Gentle Hand in Taxing Timberland By Travis Greaves In the realm of real property taxation, the best-known tax is on residential property. Every U.S. homeowner
More informationLegislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018
Legislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018 While the last federal minimum wage increase was on July 24, 2009, when it rose from $6.55 to $7.25 per hour, many state and local governments
More informationMethodology. Respondents. Survey Process
Methodology The 2011 ABA Compensation & Benefits Survey was designed to meet the needs of banks across the nation. The survey was administered by enetrix, A Division of Gallup, Inc., and an invitation
More informationPHMSA Update on Public Awareness
PHMSA Update on Public Awareness 2010 Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Tom Finch PHMSA - Western Region CATS Manager Overview PHMSA Mission and Scope Why Public Awareness Public Awareness
More informationCattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent
Washington, D.C. Cattle on Feed Released December 9, 003, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "" call Steve Anderson at (0) 70-40,
More informationResearch Brief. Participation in Out-Of- School-Time Activities and Programs. MARCH 2014 Publication # OVERVIEW KEY FINDINGS. childtrends.
MARCH 2014 Publication #2014-13 Participation in Out-Of- School-Time Activities and Programs OVERVIEW Kristin Anderson Moore, Ph.D., David Murphey, Ph.D., Tawana Bandy, M.S., and P. Mae Cooper, B.A. Children
More informationTrends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: October 2013
Trends in U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: 2004-2012 October 2013 By Teresa Foster and Leslie Glustrom Inquiries or corrections to info@cleanenergyaction.org 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 5 UNITED STATES
More informationA Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership
INL/EXT-06-11519 A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership Douglas G. Hall, INL Project Manager Kelly S. Reeves, NPS June 2006 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY Business Continuity Compensation Report - United States of America Compensation Review May 2017 Benchmarking. Plan Ahead. Be Ahead. Data collected between January March 2017 with
More informationOther examples: tourism (lodging, car rental, etc.), tobacco and alcoholic beverage excise, real estate transfer
Local Option Taes Local option taes are taes levied with state approval by municipalities, county, and special district governments including school districts. Forty-three states authorize local option
More informationForest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment
Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment Abstract Oswalt, Sonja N.; Miles, Patrick D.; Pugh, Scott A.; Smith, W.
More informationAnnouncement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture
Announcement of Class and Component s United States Department of Agriculture Dairy Programs Market Information Branch CLS-0917 September 2017 Highlights Class II was $16.80 per hundredweight for the month
More informationFREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. Spatial Patterns in Household Demand for Ethanol Hayk Khachatryan, Ken Casavant and Eric Jessup
FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Spatial Patterns in Household Demand for Ethanol Hayk Khachatryan, Ken Casavant and Eric Jessup Spatial Patterns in Household Demand for Ethanol Hayk Khachatryan,
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Adminisitration Collection: Records of the U.S. Office of Emergency Planning, Author Index
All Regional Offices Called and Alerted, Senior Watch Duty Began, Octcber 21, 1962, 8:20 p.m. Briefing of Agencies Having Support Functions under Department of the Treasury. Committee on Civil Defense
More informationGUIDE TO STATE VOTING LAWS
Alabama Up to one hour specified by employer to vote in municipal, county, state, or federal primary or election. Employee must give reasonable notice to employer; leave requirement does not apply if employee's
More informationRadiology Staffing Survey 2010
Radiology Staffing Survey 2010 A Nationwide Survey of Registered Radiologic Technologists Conducted by the American Society of Radiologic Technologists Reported June 2010 2010 ASRT. All rights reserved.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY Business Continuity Compensation Report - United States of America Compensation Review July 2015 Benchmarking. Plan Ahead. Be Ahead. Data collected between February May 2015 with
More informationGUIDELINE FOR SELECTING AND MODIFYING THE OZONE MONITORING SEASON BASED ON AN 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-98-00 Environmental Protection Planning and Standards June 998 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 277 Air GUIDELINE FOR SELECTING AND MODIFYING THE OZONE MONITORING
More informationInterstate Movement Of Municipal Solid Waste
1.S: P'E C I A L R E P 0 R T: 2 Interstate Movement Of Municipal Solid Waste February 1992 The United States has an intricate web of beneficial interstate movements of municipal solid waste. Where interstate
More informationClimate Regulation in the United States
Climate Regulation in the United States Karen Palmer IAEE/USAEE International Conference Plenary: Climate Change and Carbon Policies -International Lessons and Perspectives June 17, 2014 A Little History
More informationBRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2016
BRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2016 No attempt has been made to rank the information contained in this report in order of importance, since BPA Worldwide believes this is a judgment which
More informationSize and Distribution of Contract Hog Production in Iowa
Economic Staff Paper Series Economics 9-1991 Size and Distribution of Contract Hog Production in Iowa Michele Rummens Iowa State University James B. Kliebenstein Iowa State University, jklieben@iastate.edu
More informationThis document was posted with the permission of the Committee on Women in Society and in the Church United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
This document was posted with the permission of the Committee on Women in Society and in the Church United States Conference of Catholic Bishops WOMEN IN DIOCESAN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS: PROGRESS REPORT,
More informationFranchise.Org IFA Supplier Member Packages
Average Monthly Unique Visitors: 150,000 Average Page Views Per Visitor: 14 Average Time Spent on Franchise.org: 8 minutes Average Monthly Supplier Profile Searches: 22,000 Total Direct Visits Delivered
More informationFranchise.Org IFA Franchisor Member Packages
Average Monthly Unique Visitors: 150,000 Average Page Views Per Visitor: 14 Total Annual Page Views: 25,200,000 Average Time Spent on Franchise.org: 8 minutes Average Number of Leads Processed Per Month:
More informationIowa Farm Outlook. February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016
Iowa Farm Outlook 0BDepartment of Economics February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2070 Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016 Curious about how fast the beef cow
More information2016 U.S. Animal Food Consumption Report
2016 U.S. Animal Food Consumption Report Prepared for: Prepared by: December 2017 2016 Animal Food Consumption Report December 2017 Contents List of Figures... 4 Executive Summary... 5 Introduction...
More informationCustomer Information Sheet
Customer Information Sheet General Information Billing Name Ship to location City State/Zip City State/Zip Telephone Website URL Account Type (Circle one) Retail Store Residential Designer To-The-Trade
More informationClean and Secure Energy Actions Report 2010 Update. GHG Policies
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Participant in Climate Registry; climate action plan: Policy Planning to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Alabama
More informationNCAT Pavement Test Track. Buzz Powell Pavement Preservation Research
NCAT Pavement Test Track Buzz Powell Pavement Preservation Research NCAT Pavement Test Track Washington Montana Oregon Idaho Wyoming Nevada Utah Colorado California New Mexico Arizona Pre-2015, 2015 North
More informationLOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM, INC.
LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM, INC. 2657 Bayview Drive Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306 (754) 779-7551 * (754) 223-7452 FAX Prepared by the Disused Sources Working Group of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste
More informationDFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(Revised November 4, 2016) PGI F, PART 2--CONTRACT QUALITY ASSURANCE ON SHIPMENTS BETWEEN CONTRACTORS PGI F-201 Procedures. (1) Use the supplier's commercial shipping document/packing list to enter performance
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard The past year has been an exciting time for energy efficiency, with several states strengthening efficiency policies and programs, and policymakers
More informationGUIDE TO STATE VOTING LAWS
Alabama One hour specified by employer to vote in municipal, county, state, or federal primary or election. Employee must give reasonable notice to employer; leave requirement does not apply if employee's
More informationFarm to Table: A look into who supports it and its significance in America today
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2013 Farm to Table: A look into who supports it and its significance
More informationAugust 4, The Honorable Donald J. Trump President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC Dear Mr. President:
August 4, 2017 The Honorable Donald J. Trump President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: On behalf of the more than 200 organizations representing rural communities,
More informationPASS-THROUGH ADJUSTMENTS (NON-DSIC)
STATE Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas PASS-THROUGH ADJUSTMENTS (NON-DSIC) Yes, rate riders are allowed, to recover costs related to the environmental tests required by the Alabama Department of Environmental
More informationCattle Outlook. January, 2018
Cattle Outlook January, 2018 Cattle Outlook January 2018 In This Issue: Supply Fundamentals Demand Fundamentals Summary 2 Historical Price Reference Where are Cattle Prices Currently, And Where are they
More informationJAN-SAN MRO DATA ESTIMATED END-USER DEMAND BY REGION & END-MARKET
$1,995.00 2014 U.S. MARKET ANALYSIS: JAN-SAN MRO DATA ESTIMATED END-USER DEMAND BY REGION & END-MARKET e l p m a S researched & produced by: www.imidata.com www.mdm.com 2014 by Gale Media Inc. All rights
More informationTHE VALUE OF DATA CONSEQUENCES FOR INSIGHT, INNOVATION & EFFICIENCY IN THE US ECONOMY DECEMBER 2015 COMMISSIONED BY. John Deighton
THE VALUE OF DATA // 2015 CONSEQUENCES FOR INSIGHT, INNOVATION & EFFICIENCY IN THE US ECONOMY DECEMBER 2015 John Deighton Baker Foundation Professor of Business Administration Harvard Business School and
More informationENERGY STAR Oil Furnaces Product List
ENERGY STAR Oil Furnaces Product List Below are currently qualified ENERGY STAR models available for sale in the U.S. and Canada * Air Leakage data was not collected under the Version 3.0 ENERGY STAR Program
More informationIntrepid Potash New Capital Investments Support Future Opportunities
Intrepid Potash New Capital Investments Support Future Opportunities MMSA Colorado Section September 7, 2012 Presentation Overview Company Overview Capital Investment Overview Presentation of Select Capital
More informationAcreage. Special Note
Acreage ISSN: 1949-22 Released June,, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). Special Note NASS is in the process
More informationA HYPOTHETICAL US SPORTS GAMBLING MARKET. Richard A. McGowan & John F. Mahon
A HYPOTHETICAL US SPORTS GAMBLING MARKET Richard A. McGowan & John F. Mahon Recap: Why this topic? I believe that sports betting should be brought out of the underground and into the sunlight where it
More informationARGUABLY the most important entity
The Environmental Protection Agency ARGUABLY the most important entity in the United States in terms of environmental health is the Environmental Protection Agency. The work of the EPA ensures a healthy
More informationHop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:
National Hop Report ISSN: 21587825 Released December 16, 2016, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016 Hop
More informationBioCycle is pleased to produce the
Curbside Programs 10,000 15th NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 8,000 6,000 4,000 2004 7,689 THE STATE OF GARBAGE 2,000 Yard Trimmings Facilities 4,000 3,000 2,000
More informationAll Mushroom Sales Virtually Unchanged, Value Down 1 Percent
Washington, D.C. Released August 6, 005, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department Agriculture. For information on call Debbie Flippin at (0) 70-350, fice hours 7:30 a.m.
More informationREINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL
REINFORCING TABLES 201 REINFORCING TABLES Design Limitations Introduction The structural wall reinforcing and lintel design tables contained within the Appendix of NUDURA s Installation Manual have been
More informationBUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Acknowledgment Statement 2 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you are about to take does
More informationNon-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves
Washington, D.C. Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves Released May 5, 2005, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on Non-ambulatory Cattle
More informationFiscal Year 2010 Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics
Fiscal Year 2010 Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water EPA 817K11001 June 2011 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Acronyms
More informationMichigan s Dairy Industry. Ken Nobis, MMPA President
Michigan s Dairy Industry Ken Nobis, MMPA President ONE CENTURY STRONG 1,200 DAIRY FARMS 5 Billion LBS. OF MILK Quality Integrity Leadership Progressive Community MMPA Locations Products made at Ovid &
More informationDrought Planning and State Government: Current Status
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Drought Mitigation Center Faculty Publications Drought -- National Drought Mitigation Center 1991 Drought Planning and State
More informationFutureMetrics LLC 8 Airport Road Bethel, ME 04217, USA
The Washington Post and 65 Experts that Wrote a Letter to Congress Are Wrong about Biomass for Energy By William Strauss, PhD May 2, 2016 On an April 28, 2016 the Washington Post published an editorial,
More informationCollaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Meg Roessing U.S.D.A. Forest Service Forest Management Staff Washington Office mroessing@fs.fed.us Background: Department and Agency Priority Our shared
More informationSOYBEANS: LARGE SUPPLIES CONFIRMED, BUT WHAT ABOUT 2005 PRODUCTION?
SOYBEANS: LARGE SUPPLIES CONFIRMED, BUT WHAT ABOUT 2005 PRODUCTION? JANUARY 2005 Darrel Good 2005 NO. 2 Summary USDA s January reports confirmed a record large 2004 U.S. crop, prospects for large year-ending
More informationDigital, Branch, Drive-Through or ATM? Yes, Please! Say Bank Customers in J.D. Power Study
Digital, Branch, Drive-Through or ATM? Yes, Please! Say Bank Customers in J.D. Power Study Among Millennials, Highest Satisfaction Achieved When Combining Mobile and Branch Banking COSTA MESA, Calif.:
More informationSolutions in Steel for Plate
ArcelorMittal USA Solutions in Steel for Plate Company and product overview ArcelorMittal Who we are The world s leading steel company ArcelorMittal is the world s leading steel company with operations
More informationHow to Create & Order a Complete Background Check Package
Product and Pricing Online Background Screening How to Create & Order a Complete Background Check Package Whether you re expanding your staff in abundance or bringing on your first employee, creating and
More information