USE OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS TOOL FOR RANKING OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY (SPS) CAPACITY-BUILDING OPTIONS IN UGANDA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "USE OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS TOOL FOR RANKING OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY (SPS) CAPACITY-BUILDING OPTIONS IN UGANDA"

Transcription

1 USE OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS TOOL FOR RANKING OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY (SPS) CAPACITY-BUILDING OPTIONS IN UGANDA Tumuboine Ephrance Phytosanitary Services Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries Kampala Technical Meeting of the COMESA Regional Sanitary and Phytosanitary Sub-Committee Lilongwe, Malawi, August 2012

2 Need for trade diversification/expand agricfood trade Traditional exports (coffee, tea, cotton) Non-traditional exports (horticulture, fish/fishery products, diary products etc Liberalization Policy (Private Sector) Public sector Regulator (Laws and Regulations) National Trade strategic Plans Development Strategy and Investment plan/national Development Plan

3 SPS Policy (To transform Uganda into one of the world s leading producer, consumer and trader of safe and quality animal and crop products on a sustainable basis Implementation Plan (2011/ /2015) SPS Coordination Committee Scanty laboratory infrastructure (Fisheries, pesticide residue testing (just a structure) Staffing structures Risk analysis (COPE) Basic training in SPS information exchange (SPS NEP) OIE contact points, IPPC contact point, Codex Contact point Basic legislations (Bills)

4 Relative performance of SPS sensitive trade net trade balance Exports at HS 2 figure level Average Live animals Meat and edible meat offal Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, aquatic invertebrates, nes Dairy products, eggs, honey, edible animal product, nes Live trees, plants, bulbs, roots, cut flowers etc Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers Edible fruit, nuts, peel of citrus fruit, melons Coffee, tea, mate and spices Cereals Oil seed, oleagic fruits, grain, seed, fruit, etc, nes Animal, vegetable fats and oils, cleavage products, etc Meat, fish and seafood food preparations, nes

5 Strengthening Phytosanitary Controls in the floriculture sector (Multiple Criteria)= STDF Demand for capacity building- Frequent interceptions PCE tool- Phytosanitary capacity gaps Vulnerable groups (Women+Children) Possibility of maintaining the employment (Wealth creation) Loss in export values Foreign exchange earnings expected to increase/maintained Poverty reduction Net gains to the economy

6 Trade diversification (value addition) Growth in exports- market access Impact on vulnerable groups (women, children) Protection of the environment Increased Agriculture/Animal productivity Poverty reduction Impact on domestic public health Impact on foreign exchange Impact on employment ALL THESE INFORM FORM THE DEVELOPMENT AGENDA OF UGANDA

7 Decision Criteria Weights and Criteria of SPS capacity building options Average Up front investment 10.9 On going costs 10.0 Trade impact [Market Access] 12.5 Trade diversification impact [value addition] 9.4 Impact on domestic agricultural/fisheries productivity 14.5 Impact on domestic public health 8.7 Impact on local environmental protection 8.2 Impact on poverty 15.0 Impact on vulnerable groups 9.1 Impact on foreign exchange earnings 0.2 Impact on employment 1.3

8 Identified capacity-building options (1) Option 1. Pesticide testing laboratory Option 2. Maize GAP s Option 3. Meat exports within the region Option 4. Meat exports from a FMD free compartments Option 5. Awareness on pesticide use (avoiding contamination of pesticides in the food

9 Option 6. Dairy exports compliance with COMESA standards Option 7. Fish; traceability systems and capacity building Option 8. Cold storage disinfestations of insect pests Option 9. Certification of agro input providers and suppliers Option 10. Pest status of bananas with respect to Bactrocera invadens

10 Identified capacity-building options (3) Option 11. Biological control of Bactrocera invadens Option 12. Aflatoxin controls for groundnuts and maize Option 13; Mycotoxin testing capacity Option 14. GAP s for oil seed producers and good storage practices

11 Biological control of B Maize good Oilseed good Biological control of Agro input product and Awareness of pesticide Dairy exports to region Fish product traceability Meat exports - regional Meat exports- Pest status of bananas Cold storage systems Mycotoxin testing Accreditation of

12 Maize good agricultural Biological control of B Oilseed good Awareness of pesticide Biological control of Dairy exports to region Agro input product and Fish product traceability Meat exports - regional Meat exports- Pest status of bananas Cold storage systems Mycotoxin testing Accreditation of

13 Agro input product and Awareness of pesticide Maize good Biological control of B Oilseed good Pest status of bananas Cold storage systems Fish product traceability Dairy exports to region Biological control of Mycotoxin testing Meat exports - regional Meat exports- Accreditation of

14 On going actvities 1. Full consultation with other stakeholders to; Review data and ensure accuracy Include other possible options 2. Carry out sensitivity analysis First iteration of analysis Finalization of training of local task team

15 1. Draw up projects based on selected capacity building options 2. Carry out further iterations of analysis to feed into other programs including DSIP and as the Integrated Framework (IF)

16 Thank you for your attention