Efficient Nutrient Management for High Crop Yield and Quality in Maize Crop

Transcription

1 Available online at Trivedi et al Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (2): (217) ISSN: DOI: ISSN: Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (2): (217) Research Article Efficient Nutrient Management for High Crop Yield and Quality in Maize Crop V. K. Trivedi *, Sushil Dimree, Ravi Kumar Meena, and Gautamveer Chauhan Department of Soil Science & Agril. Chemistry C.S. Azad Univ. of Agril. & Tech. Kanpur U.P., India *Corresponding Author vivektrivedi2@gmail.com Received: Revised: Accepted: ABSTRACT The field experiment on maize crop was conducted at research farm of C.S.A. University of Agriculture & Technology Kanpur, during Kharif season and The doses of experiment were Control, 1% NPK, 1% NPK+ S4, 1% NPK + Zn5, 1% NPK+S4 +Zn5, 125% NPK, 125% NPK + S4, 125% NPK + Zn5, 125% NPK + S4 + Zn5 and 15% NPK. The results showed that the grain yield of maize first year (215) varied from to 3.78 q ha -1 and in second year (216) varied from to 32.8 q ha -1 and the straw yield of maize first year (215) varied from to 81.1 q ha -1 and in second year (216) varied from to q ha -1. It was noted the N uptake in maize grain varied from to 5.9 kg ha - 1 and to 57.7 kg ha -1, P from 3.86 to 1.46 kg ha -1 and 4.15 to kg ha -1, K from to kg ha -1 and to kg ha -1, S from 4.72 to and 5.4 to kg ha -1, Zn from g to g1kg -1 and g to 1.4 g1kg -1 in first and second years, respectively. It was noted the N uptake in maize straw varied from to kg ha -1 and 14.6 to kg ha -1, P from 4.3 to 1.54 kg ha -1 and 4.34 to kg ha -1, K from to kg ha -1 and to kg ha -1, S from 8.21 to and 8.29 to kg ha -1, Zn from g to g1kg -1 and g to g1kg -1 in first and second years, respectively. The protein content varied from 6.73 to 7.94% and 6.66 to 8.1%, oil from 6.53 to 7.59% and 6.61 to 7.8%, lysine from 21.2 to 33.2 mg/1g and 21.4 to mg/1g in first and second years, respectively. The dose of 125% NPK+S4+Zn5 were found most suitable in respect of crop yield, nutrient content, uptake of nutrient and quality of maize except lysine content in maize. Key words: Maize, Nutrient, Grain, Crop, NPK INTRODUCTION Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most important grain crop in South Africa and is produced throughout the country under diverse environments. Successful maize production depends on the correct application of production inputs that will sustain the environment as well as agricultural production. These inputs are, inter alia, adapted cultivars, plant population, soil tillage, fertilisation, weed, insect and disease control, harvesting, marketing and financial resources. Cite this article: Trivedi, V. K., Dimree, S., Meena, R.K. and Chauhan, G., Efficient Nutrient Management for High Crop Yield and Quality in Maize Crop, Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5(2): (217). doi: Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 711

2 In developed countries, maize is consumed As per the USDA report of May, 216, the mainly as second-cycle produce, in the form of world maize production has been estimated meat, eggs and dairy products. In developing about crore tonnes in which is countries, maize is consumed directly and 4.6 per cent lower than last year (11.35 crore serves as staple diet for some 2 million tonnes). Whereas, total coarse grains people. Most people regard maize as a production was also slightly decreased from breakfast cereal. However, in a processed form crore tonnes in to crore it is also found as fuel (ethanol) and starch. tonnes in and year ending stock Starch in turn involves enzymatic conversion would be about crore tonnes same as into products such as sorbitol, dextrine, sorbic previous year. Hence, in ensuing season too, and lactic acid, and appears in household items the maize price will remain stable at world such as beer, ice cream, syrup, shoe polish, level and in India also became of good glue, fireworks, ink, batteries, mustard, monsoon possibility. This reveals the limited cosmetics, aspirin and paint. Approximately chance for maize export in current year. The 8, million tons of maize grain are produced in Government has fixed MSP Rs. 273 per 2 kg South Africa annually on approximately 3,1 (Rs per quintal) for the current year. million ha of land. Half of the production With this background, the research team of consists of white maize, for human food Department of Agricultural Economics, consumption. Junagadh Agricultural University has analysed The cereals occupy about 54% of total the historical monthly price data of maize from cropped area in India. last twelve years collected from Dahod The India produces Maize occupies about Regulated Market. The econometric analysis 3.6% of the total cropped area of India. Maize revealed that the prices of maize may remain is the third most important cereal crop in India in the range of Rs. 28 to 3 per 2 kg (14 after rice and wheat. It accounts for 9 per cent 15 Rs/qtl) during October to December, of total food grain production in the country. 216 (i.e. at harvest). Hence, farmers are Karnataka, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, suggested to take their own decision for the Maharashtra, and Uttar Pradesh are the major inclusion of maize crop in their cropping plan maize producing states together contribute 6 accordingly. per cent of area and 7 per cent of maize production in India. Last year in India in 215- MATERIALS AND METHOD 16, maize occupied lakh ha area and The experiment was conducted at research production was estimated 13 per cent low farm Chandra Shekhar Azad University of about 21.2 lakh tonnes (Third Advance Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur during Estimates dt ) as against lakh the Kharif season 215 and 216. The maize ha and lakh tonnes in previous year verity Azad Uttam were taken for study with respectively. In Gujarat, the maize occupies 1 treatment and 4 replication the initial more area in about 4 lakh ha as characterstics of soil (initial stage) were also against 3.82 lakh ha in but production analyse to know the nutrient status of soil. The remains slight low about 5.96 lakh tonnes as soil of experimental field is low in organic against 6.31 lakh tonnes in previous year. carbon, available N 2 and available Zn but Hence, maize price remain stable around Rs. medium in case of available P, K and available 3 per 2 kg throughout the year with slight S. The ph and EC was soil in normal range. ups and downs. This is mainly due to The ph EC and organic carbon are analyse by reduction of export from lakh tonnes in the method described by Jackson 3. Available to about 6.5 lakh tonnes in as N 2 was determine by Alkaline permanganate maize price remained slight higher than the method as described by Subbiah and Asija 9. world level. Available phosphorus was extracted with.5 Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 712

3 % increase % increase % increase % increase Trivedi et al Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (2): (217) ISSN: M NaHCO 3 Olsen et al 5. The P was determine Zn. Nitrogen was determined by Kjeldal s in extract by vandomolybdate yellow colour method 3. Phosphoras was determined method Jackson 3. The available K was calorimetrically 1. Potassium was determined determined by flame photometer. Available by flame photometric method. Sulphar was sulphur was determined by Chesnin and Yien 2. determined by Chesnin and Yien 2. Zinc was Available zinc was estimated by atomic determined by atomic absorption absorption spectrophotometer. The plant spectrophotometer. samples were also analysed for N P K, S and Table-1 Effect of different fertilizer treatments on grain and Straw yield of maize in both years Treatments combination Grain yield in q ha -1 Straw yield in q ha Control % NPK % NPK+S %NPK+Zn %NPK+S 4 +Zn %NPK %NPK+S %NPK+Zn %NPK+S 4 +Zn %NPK Mean S.E. (d) C.D. (P=.5) NPK NPK Zn NPK S NPK S Zn NPK NPK Zn NPK S NPK S Zn Fig. 1: Maize Grain yield 1 st year Fig. 2: Maize Grain yield 2 nd year NPK NPK Zn NPK S NPK S Zn NPK NPK Zn NPK S NPK S Zn Fig. 3: Maize Straw Yield 1 st year Fig. 4: Maize Straw yield 2 nd year Table-2 Effect of different treatments on uptake of N P K S and Zn of maize grain in both year Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 713

4 Treatment Uptake values Uptake values N(kgha -1 ) P(kgha -1 ) K(kgha -1 ) S(kgha -1 ) Zn(gha -1 ) N(kgha -1 ) P(kgha -1 ) K(kgha -1 ) S(kgha -1 ) Zn(gha -1 ) T T T T T T T T T T S.E. (d) C.D (P=.5) Table-3 Effect of different treatments on Protein, Oil and Lysine content of maize grain in both year Treatment Protein Oil Lysine (mg/1g) Protein Oil Lysine (mg/1g) T T T T T T T T T T S.E. (d) C.D. (P=.5) Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 714

5 Fig. 5:.Mean harvest of protein under different treatments from maize grain Fig. 6: Mean harvest of oil under different treatments from maize kernel was observed in treatment 125% NPK+S+Zn followed by 1% NPK+S+Zn (about 24 kg ha -1 ). RESULT AND DISCUSSION Fertilizers are play very important role in the yield of economy of the crop. Fertilizer alone contributed 55 to 6% to achieve the biological yield of a crop. In inceptisols five most limiting nutrients have been identified i.e. N,P,K,S and Zn. The element S and Zn are the recent additions in this list. The several side nutrient specific trails conducted at different locations both on farm and off farm established the need of sulphur and zinc along with NPK for yield maximization. The results of present study are discussed as under:- Grain yield:- There were significant variations in the data under different treatments. During first year it varied from to 3.78 q ha -1 with a mean value of q ha -1. Among NPK levels 125% NPK gave significantly higher yield over to 1% NPK to the tune of about 18% in grain yield. Further increase in NPK doses upto 15% the increase in yield was not significant. Addition of sulphur to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 18%. At 125% NPK addition of S resulted significant increase of about 11%. Addition of zinc to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 15%. At 125% NPK addition of Zn resulted significant increase of about 9%. Addition of S+Zn to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 3%. At 125% NPK addition of S+Zn resulted significant increase of about 23%. Similarly during second year the data varied from to 32.8 q ha -1 with a general mean value of q ha -1. Among NPK levels 125% NPK gave significantly higher yield to 1% NPK to the tune of about 2% in grain yield. Further increase in NPK doses upto 15% the increase in yield was not significant. Addition of sulphur to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 19%. At 125% NPK addition of S resulted significant increase of about 9%. Addition of zinc to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 14%. At 125% NPK addition of Zn resulted significant increase of about 5%. Addition of S+Zn to 1% NPK also caused significant increase of about 29%. At 125% NPK addition of S+Zn resulted significant increase of about 21%. The trend of variation in grain yield due to differential levels of nutrients is defected. The grain yield of maize as affected by nutrient treatments is given in Table 1. The data of current study are in agreement with several workers 7. Straw yield:- The straw yield of maize as affected by nutrient treatments is given in Table 1. There were significant variations in the data under different treatments. During first year it varied from to 81.1 q ha -1 with a mean value of q ha -1. Among NPK levels 125% NPK gave significantly higher yield over 1% NPK to the tune of about 2% in straw yield. Further increase in NPK doses upto 15%, the increase in yield Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 715

6 was also significant. Addition of sulphur to 1.54 kg ha -1 and 4.34 to kg ha -1, K from 1% NPK also caused significant increase in to kg ha -1 and to kg yield of about 17% over 1% NPK alone. At ha -1, S from 8.21 to and 8.29 to kg 125% NPK addition of S resulted in on ha -1, Zn from g to g1kg -1 significant increase in yield over 125% NPK. and g to g1kg -1 in first and Addition of zinc to 1% NPK also caused second years, respectively. The uptake values significant increase in yield of about 17%. The of nutrients in grain and straw increased due to yield differences in 125% NPK+Zn and 125% concentration of these nutrients and biological NPK were also small but significance. yield of grain and straw. The uptake values Addition of S+Zn sequentially to 1% and indicate the appropriate quantity of nutrients 125% NPK resulted in significant increases in required for optimum yield in present straw yield to the tune of 28% and 19% investigation. Any reduction in above dose respectively. level cause declying in yield of maize crop. Similarly during second year the data Similar kind of results has been reported by varied from to q ha -1 with a mean Singh and pathak 7. value of q ha -1. Among NPK levels Crop quality- The crop quality of maize as 125% NPK gave significantly higher yield affected by nutrient treatments is given in uptake to 1% NPK to the tune of about 19% Table 3. The maximum protein and oil content in straw yield. Further increase in NPK doses in maize grain was observed in T 9 (125% NPK upto 15% the increase in yield was + S4 +Zn5) treatment and lowest in control. significant. Addition of sulphur to 1% NPK In case of lysine content the highest value was also caused significant increase of about 17%. recorded in control and lowest in T 9 treatment However, there was small but significant combination. Thus there is a negative increases in straw yield due to addition of S to relationship appeared in between protein and 125% NPK alone. Addition of zinc to 1% oil content. The data of current study are in NPK also caused significant increase of about agreement with several workers 4,8. 18%. At 125% NPK addition of Zn also caused significant increase in straw yield. CONCLUSION Addition of S+Zn to 1% NPK also caused The dose of 125% NPK+S4+Zn5 was the significant increase of about 28%. At 125% best dose amongs all in terms of grain yield, NPK addition of S+Zn resulted significant straw yield, uptake values and crop quality. So increase of about 2%. The data of current it is concluded that application of Sulphur and study are in agreement with several workers 6. Zinc along with the combination of 125NPK Uptake- The uptake values indicate the gave best results to the farmers. appropriate quantity of nutrients required for optimum yield in present investigation. It was REFERENCES noted the N uptake in maize grain varied from 1. Chapman, H.D. and Pratt, P.F., Method of to 5.9 kg ha -1 and to 57.7 kg analysis for soils, plants and water. ha -1, P from 3.86 to 1.46 kg ha -1 and 4.15 to University of California, U.S.A (1961) kg ha -1, K from to kg ha Chesnin, L. and Yien, C.H., Turbidimetric and to kg ha -1, S from 4.72 to determination of available sulphur and 5.4 to kg ha -1, Zn from.proceeding Soil Science Society Amarica., g to g1kg -1 and g to 14: (195). 1.4 g1kg -1 in first and second years, 3. Jackson, M.L., Soil chemical analysis. respectively. It was noted the N uptake in Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, maize straw varied from to kg ha -1 pp. 498 (1967). and 14.6 to kg ha -1, P from 4.3 to Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 716

7 4. Majumdar, Gajendra Jat, santosh, S.P., yield significantly. Asian Journal of Soil Chaudhary, and Jat, N.K., Influence of Science. 4(2): (21). potassium and zinc fertilization on 7. Singh, R.N. and Pathak, R.K., Effect of productivity, quality, nutrient uptake, potassium and magnesium on yield, their morphological and bio-chemical uptake and quality characteristics of wheat parameters of wheat. Indian Journal of (Triticum aestivum). Journal of the Indian Fertilizers, 8(1): ref. (212). Society of Soil Science, 5(2): Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanable F.S. (22). and Dean, L.A., Estimation of available 8. Stewart, B.A. and Porter, L.K., N:S ratio phosphorus in soil by extraction with in top and root of wheat, corn and bean sodium bicarbonate. Circ. U.S. study in relation to N and S supply in soil. Deptt.Agric., 939 (1954). Agronomy. Journal 61: (1969). 6. Palora, K.B., Sardhana, R.V., Parmar, 9. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija. G.L., A rapid K.B., Babariya, N.B. and Patel, K.G., procedure for the estimation of available Given K uptake to produce grain and straw nitrogen in soil. Current Science, 25: (1956). Copyright April, 217; IJPAB 717