Evaluation of barley germplasm

Transcription

1 Evaluation of barley germplasm Alptekin Karagöz Central Research Institute for Field Crops Ankara Phone: Fax :

2 Dr. Mirza Hacızade Gökgöl ( )

3 Dr. Mirza Gökgöl Dedicated d his life to collection and evaluation of cereal genetic resources, Among the wheat landraces grown in Turkey, Gökgöl öl identified ifi d different types, and 256 sub species

4 Triticum turgidum var. plinianum

5 Institutional seed bank Safety duplicate of AARI Genebank

6

7

8

9 Cereals Food legumes 492 Forages 645 Rare, endemic, threatened 454 Others 155 Safety duplicate TOTAL

10 Cereal collection Wild wheat (Aegilops + Triticum) 591 Cultivated wheat Oats (49 wild) 61 Rye (7 wild) 19 Barley (wild) 118 Barley (cultivated) TOTAL 7.113

11 Triticum dicoccoides

12 Triticum timopheevi

13

14

15

16

17

18 Barley, Mardin

19

20 Haymana, 2002

21 Interspecific hybrids Aegilops biuncialis

22 Interspecific hybrids Aegilops triaristata Aegilops triuncialis

23 Interspecific hybrids Aegilops ovata Aegilops columnaris

24 Şanlıurfa Province Çankırı Province

25 Aegilops speltoides Aegilops tauschii Aegilops umbellulata Aegilops vavilovii

26

27 In situ conservation of genetic diversity project (Şanlıurfa) Aegilops speltoides Triticum aegilopoides Triticum dicoccoides Aegilops tauschii

28 Ecosystem conservation for threatened plant species of Turkey. Thermopsis turcica Linum seljukorum Pinguicula crystallina Hypericum salsugineum

29 Design, testing and evaluation of best practices for in situ conservation of economically important wild plant species. (Sideritis congesta)

30 Evaluation of barley germplasm Barley (cultivated) Source: Collecting missions, Barley germplasm of Anatolian Agric. Res. Ins. (Eskişehir) Alptekin Karagöz (PGR) Kürşad Özbek (PGR) Turgay Polat (PGR) Taner Akar (Barley Breeding) İsmail Sayım (Barley Breeding) Namuk Ergun (Barley Breeding) Hülya Sipahi (Biotechnology)

31

32 No Character Descriptor state 1 Growth habit 1. Erect, 2. Intermediate da 3. Prostrate 2 Stipule color 1. Red 2. White 3. Variegated 3 Ligula color 1. Anthosyanin + 2. Anthosyanin - 4 Flag leaf length cm 5 Flag leaf width mm 6 Status of flag leaf 1. Erect 2. Prostrate 3. Wrinkled

33 No Character Descriptor state 7 Early spring growth 1. Early 2. Intermediate 3. Late 8 No. Of days to heading January 1 = 1 9 No. Of days to maturity January 1 = 1 10 Resistance to lodging 1. Very good 3. Good 5. Medium 7. Weak 9. Very weak 11 Stem length cm 12 Spike length mm

34 No Character Descriptor state 13 Kernel rows 1. 6 rowed rowed 14 Awn tip pigmentation 1. Anthosyanin + 2. Anthosyanin - 15 Awn length mm 16 Awn toothedness/smoothness 1. Toothed 2. Smooth 17 Awn color 1. White 3. Yellow 5. Brown 7. Reddish 9. Black 18 Auricle color 1. Red 2. White 3. Mixed

35 No Character Descriptor state 19 Ligula color 1. Anthosyanin + 2. Anthosyanin - 20 Stem color 1. Brown 4. Purple 5. Others 21 No. of productive tillers 22 Kernel color 1. White 2. Blue 3. Black 4. Other 5. Mixed kernel weight g 24 Growth class 1. Winter 2. Facultative 3. Spring

36 Meteorological data Temperature (0C) Humidity (%) Precipitation (mm) January February March April May June July August September November October December Average temperature ( 0 C) : 11,8 Average humidity (%) : 59,7 Total precipitation (mm) : 359,2

37

38

39 Basic statistical data for 2617 accessions Character Average St. Dev. CV (%) Growth habit Stipule color Ligula color Ligula length Flag leaf length Flag leaf width Status of flag leaf Early spring growth No. Of days to heading No. Of days to maturity Resistance to lodging 170 1, ,59 34,52 0,92 0,45 48, , ,32 53,48 1,32 0,39 29,30 13,40 2,40 17,92 9,82 2,08 21,19 1,83 0,74 40,60 2,15 0,70 32,64 162,23 67,37 4,15 192,89 65,79 3,41 2,55 0,64 25,03

40 Basic statistical data for 2617 accessions (cont.) Character Average St. Dev. CV (%) Stem length Spike length Kernel rows Awn tip pigm. Awn length Awn tooth./smooth. Awn color Stem color Productive tillers Growth class 72,59 15, ,83 9,34 15,69 16,80 1,69 0,44 26,31 1,15 0,35 30,32 12,36 2,47 19,95 1,10 0,29 26,09 2,49 1,38 55,57 2,21 14,45 65,32 4,75 1,97 41, , ,74 44,26

41 Similarity dendogram for Countries + FAO Egy pt (18) Russia (191) A lger+tun. (8) C h in a ( 8 3 ) Ethiopia (71) India (30) Germany (19) Ir a n ( 2 8 ) En g la n d ( 5 0 ) Sw eeden (43) Denmark (16) Finland (7) Poland (48) J a p a n ( 2 7 ) Spain (16) Romania (9) A rgentina (11) Canada (29) M e x ic o ( 9 7 ) A ustria (31) Hungary (22) Sw itzerl. (7) France (34) Netherlands ( 19) Czech Rep. (36) Y ugoslavia (27) Turkey (859) USA (351) FA O (85) A ustralia (21) Syria (13) B u lg a r ia ( 8 ) Ir a q ( 6 )

42 Similarity dendogram for Countries (combined) + FAO

43 Similarity dendogram for Continents, Turkey and FAO

44 Molecular characterization In addition to agro-morphological characterization, biochemical (hordein) and molecular (RAPD) characterization ti will also be undertaken by the Barley Breeding Dept of the Institute. Totally 300 accessions have been sampleded and sent to the lab for this purpose. This part of the study is being funded by Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Association (TUBITAK).

45 Centaurea tchiatcheffii t h

46

47 Design, testing and evaluation of best practices for in situ conservation of economically important wild plant species. (Liquidambar orientalis)

48 TURKEY(859) ASIA(406) AMERICA(497) FAO(85) AUSTRALIA(21) EUROPE(471) AFRICA(100)

49 Lentil, Diyarbakır

50

51

52 EG,ALGER,TUN, CH (109) T URK,USA, AUSTRALIA,FAO (1316) ARG,CANADA (46) ET,IN,IRAN,GER, ENG,SWE (308) DEN,FIN,POL (71) JP,ROM,SP (52) MEXICO (97) AUS, HUN (53) SWIT,NET,FR, CZ,YUG (123) SYRIA (13) IRAQ (6) RUSSIA (191) BULGARIA (8)

53