Open Access Barometer: a mapping and visualisation of open access to Danish research. Mikael K. Elbæk Senior Project

Transcription

1 Open Access Barometer: a mapping and visualisation of open access to Danish research Mikael K. Elbæk Senior Project

2 A manometer on a steam-engine. Manufactured by Söderströms gjuteri- och mek. verkstads A.-B. in Norrköping, Sweden. Photo: Zaphod Februari 6, 2005.

3 Project info Project title: DEFF Dansk Open Access Barometer (Danish Open Access Barometer) en undersøgelse af den aktuelle Open Access situation i Danmark og kravspecifikation til et web baseret Open Access barometer (a survey of the current status for Open Access in Denmark and the specification of a web based Open Access Barometer) Project coordinator: Mikael Elbæk, DTU Bibliotek Participating institutions: Copenhagen University Library, DTU Library, Roskilde University Library, University Library of Southern Denmark Funded: By DEFF (Denmark s Electronic Research Library) Supported by DEFF with DKK Wiki: e

4 Partners Anne Thorst Melbye, University of Southern Denmark Tove Juul Hansen, Univeristy of Southern Denmark Sidse Schelde, Roskilde University Asger V. Larsen, University of Copenhagen -> now University of Southern Denmark Bertil F. Dorch, University of Southern Denmark And more did help out

5 Vision To let the world know how Open Access to science is progressing

6 Vision Measuring open access effects behaviour towards more open access

7 The Practice of Typography: Modern Methods of Book Composition (1904), New York: The Century Co., p Digital scan available at

8 Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, LC-DIG-highsm (original digital file), uncompressed archival TIFF version (103 MB), cropped and converted to JPEG with the GIMP 2.4.5, image quality 88.

9 Strategy Utilize available data sources To visualize the (current) state of Open Access To demonstrate relevant and interesting data views i.e. comparing and showing trends To make a userfriendly tool that can give incentives to move Open Access forward Create methods and software to repeat the process again and again.

10 Background Institutional policies Universitet Grøn OA Gylden OA Publiceringsfond Berlin declaration Aarhus Universitet Ja Nej Nej Nej Aalborg Universitet Ja Ja Nej Ja (2012) Copenhagen Business School Ja Nej Nej Ja (2008) Roskilde Universitet Ja Nej Nej Ja (2006) Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Ja Nej Nej Nej IT-universitetet Nej Nej Nej Nej Københavns Universitet Nej Nej Nej Nej Syddansk Universitet Ja Nej Nej Nej

11 Background Funder policies All major public funders unified policy Funder policies since June 2012 Green policy Peer review journal articles Opt-out

12 This Image was released by the United States Navy with the ID N-5862D-128

13 Platform Data: BFI (latest dataset 2011) Danish National Research Database (for links to full texts) SHERPA/ROMEo (for potential) DOAJ.org for OA-journals Review (to complement machine data)

14 Bibliometric Research Indicator Or just BFI B for Bibliometric F for Forskning = research I for Indicator Funding allocation model based on points given to institutions based on publishing in A number for expert selected publication channels: journals and selected publishers for books A common data model, all institutions have focus on providing as correct and full data as possible, because it means money

15

16 Demarcation of data The data set from BFI was We limited to publications that has relevance to the research funders OA-policies, i.e.: Peer reviewed research articles, including Peer reviewed conference proceedings, chapter/articles in books and articles. Result records Peer reviewed BFI-credit giving articles alone records

17 Two parallel tracks Mapping of Open Access 2011 Collecting data from authoritative sources Review resultat, and get additions from universities Analyse results Produce report Distribute for stakeholders and decision makers Prototyping an OA Barometer Use data from authoritative sources Automate data collection To enable repetition on a frequent basis Identify wanted and possible features Create prototype Present results to stakeholders Document lessons learnt at use for the next gen of the National research database

18 Universities/institutions Researchers Media/Public Policy makers

19 Mapping open access to Danish research 2011 PRESENTING THE RESULTS

20 Open Access baseline To peer review BFI-credit giving articles 11 %

21 After Review Open Access to peer review articles 11 % 22 %

22 Open Access to BFI-articles Total Open Access share of BFI articles 2745; 21% No Yes 10641; 79%

23 Open Access per university 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Non-OA Open Access 30% 20% 10% 0% Aalborg University Aarhus University Copenhagen Business School IT-University Roskilde University Technical Univeristy of Denmark University of Copenhagen University of Southern Denmark

24 Open Access potential The total OA potential for BFI articles 7390; 57% 5556; 43% No Yes

25 OA-potential per university 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% No OA-potential OA-potential 30% 20% 10% 0% Aalborg University Aarhus University Copenhagen Business School IT-University Roskilde University Technical Univeristy of Denmark University of Copenhagen University of Southern Denmark

26 Unused OA-potential Total unused OA-potential for BFI articles 2172; 29% Yes No Yes Yes 5218; 71%

27 Unused OA-potential per university 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% OA potential not used OA potential used 30% 20% 10% 0% Aalborg University Aarhus University Copenhagen Business School IT-University Roskilde University Technical Univeristy of Denmark University of Copenhagen University of Southern Denmark

28 But take note! Sherpa/Romeo data 100% 90% (blank); % 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% yellow; 3993 white; 1621 green; 8102 (blank) yellow white green gray blue 10% 0% gray; 983 blue; 674 Total

29 Open Access by type 1096; 8% 1632; 13% Golden (OA-journals) Green (parallelpublishing) Not-OA 10218; 79%

30 Open Access types per university 100% 90% 80% 20 70% % 50% Non-OA 40% 17 Green Golden 30% 20% % 0% Aalborg University Aarhus University Copenhagen Business School 8 IT-University Roskilde University Technical Univeristy of Denmark University of Copenhagen University of Southern Denmark

31 71 %

32 5.218

33

34 Other types of Access

35 Delayed access

36 Hybrid Open Access

37 Some are greener than others

38 Perspectives Open Access metadata / vocabularies What kind of Open Access (other types of access) Dates / embargoes Licenses Payments (what, when and who?) ORCID to identify researchers FundRef and unique IDs for grants to identify grants and links to output

39 Publishing the data How open can we make the data? Basically we are not doing anything that a kid with some Phyton skills could do in a day or two! We wish to be as OPEN as possible

40 OA Census Three use cases including Pop in your ORCID and get a report OA Hackaton August