Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C.
|
|
- Georgina Neal
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Specifications Breakout Session 2 Pete Yehl and Mike Coutant, moderators
2 Best Practices and GMPs in Early Development Problem Statement Improved clarity in definition of GMP expectations for early development (Phase I to 2a) would advance innovation in drug product development Potential to improve cycle times and reduce costs, while maintaining appropriate product quality and always ensuring patient safety Each company in Industry interprets existing GMP guidances according to its own culture and risk tolerance In part, this is due to the vague nature of the guidances available regarding GMP expectations in early dev (e.g. Q7A, Phase 1 GMPs, etc) Internal Industry debates between QA and CMC groups often result in conservative one-size fits all interpretations across the dev continuum Feedback from the previous 2007 PhRMA initiative: Biggest roadblock to achieving greater flexibility in early development is ourselves in Industry A common approach to best practices and GMP expectations for early development is needed to build alignment with regulatory agencies and internal stakeholders IQ Webinar: GMPs in Early Development 2
3 Scope Highlights of the IQ Specifications Paper Small molecules (biologics not included) Relevant to solid oral dosage forms US Regulatory filings (concepts should be applicable to rest of world) General Concepts ICH Q6A appropriate for commercial not Early Development Commercial specifications should be tied to final process validation results Process, formulation, and method changes expected in early Dev so Specs evolve During late development, maturing product and process understanding Risk based approach: Early clinical has safety focus wider acceptance criteria (AC) High attrition rate for compounds in early development Late development growing product and process understanding maturing specs Differentiating Early Phase Spec by standardizing typical tests and AC Release (submitted in regulatory filings) Stability (to establish DS and DP retest dates) Internal (for informational purposes only, but can have tighter AC) IQ Specs paper intended to be provocative starting point to stimulate discussion 3
4 Topic 1: General Control Strategies IQ proposal: In-Process control vs. Internal Target vs. Regulatory Specification In addition to release and stability tests, consideration is given to internal tests and acceptance criteria that are not normally part of formal specifications. These internal tests can be performed to collect information for product and process understanding, or to allow for tighter control (i.e., target criteria tighter than the release testing criteria) to ensure product quality will be maintained throughout the product s retest period. Based on the information obtained in early development, additional tests and acceptance criteria for other attributes (e.g. water content) can be included as the late development focus shifts to process and product performance and consistency; eventually aligning the available ICH guidelines. Discussion: Use of IPCs vs. formal internal targets vs. registered specifications throughout development When does something move from being an internal target to registered specification? For PIC/PIB formulations, can purity be assigned through API testing? Agreement on the general use of internal targets as a means of impurity control in Early Development. Understanding when it is and isn t acceptable to monitor internally vs. having a formal regulatory specification 4
5 Topic 1: General Control Strategies IQ proposal: Use of IPCs to control chemical, chiral, solvent and residual metal/inorganic impurities in final API and Drug product DP intermediates (i.e. spray dry, HME) control of solvents and degradation products Consider intermediate testing for residual solvents, chiral purity Methods in place to control chemical impurities in API through RSM control Acceptability of using internal tests to obviate the need to submit additional test data and methods for health authority review would be contingent on product and materials knowledge level Balance of upfront effort to qualify IPC or intermediate test methods in lieu of testing API and validation would be a business decision Discussion: Use of IPCs vs. formal internal targets vs. registered API specifications and methods through various development stages Could this be applied DP intermediates? Early QBD approach to development is this a business risk that companies would consider? Would internal testing and control of intermediates be sufficient? Agreement on the general use of internal targets as a means of impurity control in Early Development. Understanding when it is and isn t acceptable to monitor internally vs. having a formal regulatory specification 5
6 Topic 2: Impurity Control Strategies IQ proposal: 3x ICH limits for ID and qualification for Phase I and Phase II, transition to ICH specifications for pivotal studies Staged approach aligns with other industry initiatives (i.e., staged TTC PGI s) Subject exposure lower and study durations are shorter. Subject population closely monitored IQ Proposal: Specification of synthetic process related impurities only in API, not in DP Discussion: Qualification threshold for early development ID vs. commercial/pre-commercial Does a staged approach have merit based on exposure arguments? Do internal impurity qualification thresholds differ from filed specifications? Any special considerations given for oncology drugs? General acceptance of process related impurity specifications limited to API unless they grow or change in the DP? Agreement on development stage/phase based approach to impurity control and specifications based on overall patient exposure and clinical care 6
7 IQ Specifications Paper: DS Summary Single set of tests and acceptance criteria (AC) for Phase 1 and 2a DS Specs Description Attribute Proposed Acceptance Criteria Range of color description e.g., White to almost-white to light yellow powder Release Internal Stability X - X ID by Spectroscopy Spectrum conforms to that of reference X - - Counterion Report results X X - Assay Impurities/ Degradation Products % anhydrous basis or anhydrous and solvent free basis if compound is a solvate Individual NMT 1.0% (can be higher if qualified ) X - X X X X Total NMT 3.0% Chiral Impurity NMT 1.0% (can be higher if qualified) X X X Residual Solvents ICH Limits or other justified limits for solvents used in the final step X X - Mutagenic Impurities Follow existing guidance until ICH M7 is finalized - X - Inorganic Impurities NMT EMEA Limits/ADI - X - Water Content Report results - X X Solid Form Report results - X X Particle Size Report results - X - ROI NMT 1.0% - X - 7
8 IQ Specifications Paper: PIB/PIC DP Summary Single set of tests and AC for PIB/PIC formulations (rely primarily on DS results) Description Attribute Same as DS for PIB Proposed Acceptance Criteria Capsule shell description for PIC Release Internal Stability X - X Identification Same as DS X X - Assay % X - X Degradation Products Use data from DS release (list degradation products only) X - X Uniformity of Dosage Units Conforms per USP<905> - X - Disintegration or Break Test Disintegration: Per USP <701> for capsules, NMT 15 min X X X 8
9 IQ Specifications Paper: Capsule/Tablet Summary Single set of tests and AC for Phase 1 and 2a capsule/tablet Specs Description Identification Attribute Proposed Acceptance Criteria Describe color, shape and dosage form (e.g. white to almost-white round tablets) Conforms to standard For HPLC-based methods: The retention time and UV absorption conforms to the standard Release Internal Stability X - X X - - Assay % X - X Degradation Products Individual unspecified NMT 1.0% Total NMT 5.0% X - X Uniformity of Dosage Units Complies with USP<905> X - - Water Content Report results - X X Dissolution or Disintegration Dissolution: Report results - X X Disintegration: Per USP <701> for capsules, NMT 15 min X - X 9
10 Topic 3: Dissolution vs. Disintegration IQ proposal is that for rapidly dissolving immediate release formulations, it is recommended to include disintegration as a regulatory filed specification Dissolution may be performed as an internal specification (i.e., report results without defined acceptance criteria) to gather product knowledge during early development (e.g., for poorly soluble drugs). As additional knowledge is gained, dissolution acceptance criteria should be established in later development (i.e., Phase 2b and beyond). For rapidly dissolving immediate release formulations, it is recommended to include disintegration as a regulatory filed specification. Discussion: When is dissolution an appropriate registered specification? Have companies been filing disintegration successfully? Any country specific challenges? What API and DP properties or development milestones would trigger development of a dissolution method? For Early Development, Disintegration is an appropriate drug product specification for rapidly dissolving immediate release formulations. Dissolution data may be generated to gather product knowledge. 10
11 Topic 4: Microbiological IQ proposal is that micro testing on either API or DP is not required in early development for oral products. Manufacturing usually takes place in non-sterile facilities Since human GI is non-sterile, limited patient risk sterility of API is business risk, even if used in parenteral Other bases for omitting micro testing on DP: Process water activity testing is an industry standard Capsule shells, other excipients are micro tested prior to use Discussion: What are the risks and strategies around microbiological testing for oral products in early development? Ancillary IV formulas produced using API made for oral use (for example in absolute BA studies) will still be micro tested (endotoxins and sterility) An agreement that sterility testing for oral products is not needed in US in early development. A broader n industry perspective on experiences with other health authorities WRT micro testing Especially in early development 11
An Overview of IQ s Position Paper: Early Development GMPs for Small-Molecule Specifications
An Overview of IQ s Position Paper: Early Development GMPs for Small-Molecule Specifications On behalf of Specifications Team Kirby Wong-Moon, Ph.D. Amgen Inc. Best Practices and Application of GMPs for
More information1-6 Specifications. Andrew Chemwolo, Technical Officer, WHO Prequalification Team Medicines Assessment
1-6 Specifications Andrew Chemwolo, Technical Officer, WHO Prequalification Team Medicines Assessment Outline Definition Why are specifications important? Setting appropriate specifications PQT-medicines
More informationControl Strategy. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10
Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10 Control Strategy International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Introduction Structure of this session
More informationQuality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review
Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review Presented by Erika E. Englund, Ph.D. Slides courtesy of Dorota Matecka, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical
More informationEarly Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective
Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective IQ Workshop, Feb. 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Ramesh Sood, Ph.D. Division Director (Acting) Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
More informationClinical qualification of specifications - a Regulator s view
Clinical qualification of specifications - a Regulator s view Mats Welin Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent those of
More informationBest Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C.
Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Manufacturing Breakout Session 1 Survey Results: Drug Product Manufacturing
More informationINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS: TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE
More informationIndustry Perspective on Manufacturing in Early Development
Industry Perspective on Manufacturing in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Eric Schmitt AbbVie IQ Drug Product Manufacturing Working Group August 2012 issue of Pharmaceutical
More informationDECISION TREE #1: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A SPECIFIED IMPURITY IN A NEW DRUG SUBSTANCE
DECISION TREE #1: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A SPECIFIED IMPURITY IN A NEW DRUG SUBSTANCE Determine impurity level in relevant batches 1 Determine mean + upper confidence limit for the impurity
More informationFuture of Question-based Review and Regulatory Submissions
Future of Question-based Review and Regulatory Submissions Robert Iser Associate Director for Policy Development (Acting) Office of Pharmaceutical Science / CDER / FDA FDA/PQRI Conference on Evolving Product
More information2017 AAM CMC Workshop
2017 AAM CMC Workshop SETTING PROPER IMPURITIES LIMITS - INCLUDING GENOTOXIC IMPURITIES INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE Janet Vaughn, Sr. Director Regulatory Affairs Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 23 May, 2017 Disclaimer
More informationGuidelines for Pharmaceutical Equivalence Requirements
Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Equivalence Requirements Version 1.1 1 September 2010 Page 1 of 9 Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Equivalence Requirements Version 1.1 Drug Sector Saudi Food & Drug Authority
More informationQbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case-Study
QbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case-Study Inna Ben-Anat, QbD Strategy Leader, Teva Pharmaceuticals IFPAC JAN 2013 R&D Three Core Components of QbD and Generic Industry: How Do They
More information9/2/2014. USP Monograph Modernization. Todays topics. USP basic. Todays topics. - USP basic. - USP publications. - USP monograph modernization
USP Monograph Modernization Procedure Review and Development Donald Min 2 USP basic Since USP's founding in 1820, our operations have grown exponentially: from 11 volunteers collaborating from their respective
More informationCOMMON DEFICIENCIES IN FINISHED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT (FPP) DOSSIERS
COMMON DEFICIENCIES IN FINISHED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT (FPP) DOSSIERS Additional guidance for manufacturers This note identifies the most common quality related deficiencies in recently assessed dossiers
More informationTEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR NEW VETERINARY DRUG SUBSTANCES AND NEW MEDICINAL PRODUCTS: CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES
VICH GL39 (QUALITY) November 2005 For implementation at Step 7 TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR NEW VETERINARY DRUG SUBSTANCES AND NEW MEDICINAL PRODUCTS: CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES Recommended for
More informationRegulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA
Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, 2015 Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA An Impurity is defined as any substance or element present in a drug substance (DS) that is
More informationSetting Specifications
536 LCGC NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 22 NUMBER 6 JUNE 2004 www.chromatographyonline.com Setting Specifications Validation Viewpoint Specifications establish the criteria to which a drug substance or product should
More informationRisk Management in Drug Product Manufacturing with Emphasis on Batch Documentation/Execution
Risk Management in Drug Product Manufacturing with Emphasis on Batch Documentation/Execution Manufacturing Breakout Session I Jack Pellett (Genentech) and Eleni Dokou (Vertex) What are typical lead-times
More informationRegulatory Assessment
Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10 Regulatory Assessment International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Presentation Overview Goal
More informationQbD in developing semisolid formulations
QbD in developing semisolid formulations 4th Jerusalem Conference on Quality and Pharma Sciences Haim Barsimantov, COO, Sol-Gel 21.05.13 Outline Drug Product Specification - definition In Process Control
More informationStrategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls
Strategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls October 21, 2016 Presented by: Sharon Ayd, Ph.D., MBA Chief Scientific Officer and SVP, Pharmaceuticals document contains proprietary
More informationNIRS, PAT, RTR testing EU experience and regulatory perspective
NIRS, PAT, RTR testing EU experience and regulatory perspective Heidelberg, Germany October 2013 European Compliance Academy (ECA) Overview of the presentation General considerations Cases submitted in
More informationLEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR STABILITY
BY DR. A.V.PRABHU LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR STABILITY 21 CFR 211.166- STABILITY TESTING GMP To assess stability characteristics to determine storage conditions and expiration dates. Written stability program
More informationFDA S GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ANDAS: STABILITY TESTING OF DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS
FDA S GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ANDAS: STABILITY TESTING OF DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS 02-December-2014 San Diego, CA Kim Huynh-Ba Executive Director PHARMALYTIK Kim.huynhba@pharmalytik.com Overview Stability
More informationConducting Successful pre-ind Meetings to Reach FDA Concurrence for Sound 505(b)(2) Development
Conducting Successful pre-ind Meetings to Reach FDA Concurrence for Sound 505(b)(2) Development 2015 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition October 28, 2015 Kimberly Raines, Ph.D. Lead Pharmacologist Quality
More informationPhase Appropriate GMPs for IMPs. Presented by: Karen S. Ginsbury For: IFF, October 31, Nov 02, 2017
Phase Appropriate GMPs for IMPs Presented by: Karen S. Ginsbury For: IFF, October 31, Nov 02, 2017 1 Lets start with References https://mhrainspectorate.blog.gov.uk/2016/0 5/20/manufacture-of-investigationalmedicinal-products-frequently-askedquestions/
More informationAPI Stability Protocols and. Chris Byrne Tasmanian Alkaloids
API Stability Protocols and Evaluations Chris Byrne Tasmanian Alkaloids API Stability Overview APIs = 100% pure Limited (if any) degradation No interactions with other agents in drug products Less likelihood
More informationInspection. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10
Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10 International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Outline Aim of - as a key part of the regulatory
More informationWorkshop Summaries. Discussions of the Global Stability Workshop are summarized for the following topics:
Workshop Summaries Discussions of the Global Stability Workshop are summarized for the following topics: QbD and Stability Program Dr. Alasandro Setting Specifications Dr. Gentry Challenges of Different
More informationGMPs for Method Validation in Early Development: An Industry Perspective (Part II)
GMPs for Method Validation in Early Development: An Industry Perspective (Part II) Pharmaceutical Technology Volume 36, Issue 7, pp. 76-84 Henrik T. Rasmussen, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Donald Chambers,
More informationPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The document PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS is intended to provide clarification on a number of issues that relate to Quality (e.g., Chemistry
More informationASMF/DMF Quality Assessment Report (QAR) IGDRP Quality Working Group
ASMF/DMF Quality Assessment Report (QAR) IGDRP Quality Working Group Version Description of Change Author Effective Date v 1.0 Original publication ASMF/DMF WG May 26, 2015 v 1.1 Watermark added ASMF/DMF
More informationAnnex 1. Good pharmacopoeial practices
Annex 1 Good pharmacopoeial practices 1. Background 68 2. Purpose and scope of good pharmacopoeial practices 69 3. Glossary 69 4. Benefits of good pharmacopoeial practices 70 5. Implementation 70 6. Monograph
More informationInternational Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATED STABILITY PROTOCOL FOR SILDENAFIL TABLETS A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE REVIEW
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATED STABILITY PROTOCOL FOR SILDENAFIL TABLETS A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE REVIEW SUKHDEV SINGH *1 AND JASBIR SINGH 2 1 Rayat Institute
More informationHow to Identify Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters
How to Identify Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters Jennifer Maguire, Ph.D. Daniel Peng, Ph.D. Office of Process and Facility (OPF) OPQ/CDER/FDA FDA/PQRI 2 nd Conference North Bethesda,
More informationEvolution of Quality Assessments Recent Trends in FDA Queries. Mike Saleh, Pfizer Inc.
Evolution of Quality Assessments Recent Trends in FDA Queries Mike Saleh, Pfizer Inc. Outline 1. Background 2. Assessment of Information Requests from Recent NDAs 3. Distribution of queries (by focus area)
More informationPharmaceutical Development (Drug Substance & Drug Product) for Visceral Leishmaniasis candidate DNDI-6148
Request for Proposal Pharmaceutical Development (Drug Substance & Drug Product) for Visceral Leishmaniasis candidate DNDI-6148 Dated: October 12 th 2015 Page 1 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE... 3 2. RFP
More informationICH Q9 An Industry Perspective: Ensuring Quality to Patients in a Risk-Based Regulatory Environment
ICH Q9 An Industry Perspective: Ensuring Quality to Patients in a Risk-Based Regulatory Environment Thomas Schultz, Ph.D. Director, Regulatory Sciences Johnson & Johnson September 12, 2007 Presentation
More informationDerivation and Justification of Safety Thresholds
Derivation and Justification of Safety Thresholds Douglas J. Ball, MS, DABT Chair, PQRI L&E Toxicology Subgroup Research Fellow, Safety Sciences - Pfizer, Inc. Agenda Basic Definitions Current Regulatory
More information2nd FDA/PQRI Conference on Advancing Product Quality
2nd FDA/PQRI Conference on Advancing Product Quality Generic Pharma Perspective on the Identification of Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters Bruce D. Johnson, Ph.D. Vice President
More informationHow to ensure the Stability of Products in Clinical Trials an Industry Perspective. Volker Schnaible
How to ensure the Stability of Products in Clinical Trials an Industry Perspective Volker Schnaible Outline Why do we need stable development products? How to ensure stability How to use stability data
More informationExtractables & Leachables. Ophthalmic Drug Products: A Regulatory Perspective Current Industry Challenges and Case Studies
Extractables & Leachables Ophthalmic Drug Products: A Regulatory Perspective Current Industry Challenges and Case Studies Ph.D. Pfizer Global Research and Development Bethesda 23/02/2011 Thresholds and
More informationICH Q3D RISK ASSESSMENT: REGULATORY SUCCESS AND STANDARDIZED METHODOLOGY FOR NEW FILINGS WILLIAM STEVENS- MERCK & CO., INC.
ICH Q3D RISK ASSESSMENT: REGULATORY SUCCESS AND STANDARDIZED METHODOLOGY FOR NEW FILINGS WILLIAM STEVENS- MERCK & CO., INC. 02 November 2017 PQRI/USP Elemental Impurities Workshop Outline Review of Risk
More informationDissolution and clinically relevant specifications: linking clinical performance to dissolution
Dissolution and clinically relevant specifications: linking clinical performance to dissolution Talia Flanagan, Dave Holt, Paul Dickinson, Paul Stott. FDA/PQRI Conference on Evolving Product Quality 16-17
More informationUSP s Perspective on Drug Product Performance Test
USP s Perspective on Drug Product Performance Test Course Overview 1. The concept of in vitro dissolution Definition and application 2. Compendial dissolution/ drug release testing 3. Method development
More informationStage 3 - Process Validation: Measuring what matters
Stage 3 - Process Validation: Measuring what matters Trevor Schoerie - PharmOut A quote. The company that fails is the company that comes to us and says Just tell us what to do and we will do it. The company
More informationMODULE 2.3 QUALITY OVERALL SUMMARY PRODUCT DOSSIER (QOS PD)
MODULE 2.3 QUALITY OVERALL SUMMARY PRODUCT DOSSIER () INTRODUCTION The introduction should include proprietary name, non-proprietary name or common name of the drug substance, company name, dosage form(s),
More informationStarting Material Selection for Type II Drug Master Files
Starting Material Selection for Type II Drug Master Files Ronald S. Michalak Quality Assessment Lead (Acting), Division of Lifecycle API Office of New Drug Products, OPQ/CDER/ FDA CDER Reorganization Office
More informationHarmonizing Standards and Specifications
WASHINGTON REPORT Harmonizing Standards and Specifications Jill Wechsler Manufacturers seek more FDA guidance about establishing product specifications during drug development as part of the agency s efforts
More informationProcess Drift: When Do We Detect it? Richard L. Friedman Director, DMPQ CDER/Office of Compliance PQRI Process Drift Workshop December 1, 2010
Process Drift: When Do We Detect it? Richard L. Friedman Director, DMPQ CDER/Office of Compliance PQRI Process Drift Workshop December 1, 2010 Overview Goal of Manufacturing Central Question: Why is process
More informationBRIEFING. . Over time, 466 may be used less frequently and may be withdrawn.
Page 1 of 13 BRIEFING 1086 USP 37 page 828. As part of an ongoing monograph modernization initiative, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is updating this general chapter, 1086 Impurities
More informationProposed Revision of USP General Chapter Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography Compounding <823>
Proposed Revision of USP General Chapter Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography Compounding Ravi Ravichandran, Ph.D. Steve Zigler, Ph.D. February 21, 2011 Agenda Rationale for the
More informationBMS Experience with the FDA-EMA QbD/PAT Joint Pilot Ambarish K. Singh, PhD Director, Global Regulatory Sciences-CMC Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
BMS Experience with the FDA-EMA QbD/PAT Joint Pilot Ambarish K. Singh, PhD Director, Global Regulatory Sciences-CMC Bristol-Myers Squibb Company FDA/PQRI Conference on Evolving Product Quality September
More informationBiowaivers: BCS and IVIVC
Workshop in Celebration of 25 th Anniversary of the School of Pharmacy School of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Biopharmaceutics of Modified Release Products and Challenging
More informationThe GCC Guidelines for Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Pharmaceutical Products EDITION TWO 1428 H 2007 G
The GCC Guidelines for Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Pharmaceutical Products EDITION TWO 1428 H 2007 G (1) INTRODUCTION The following guideline defines the stability data package for a drug
More informationCommonly Seen Drug Product Related Quality Deficiencies
Commonly Seen Drug Product Related Quality Deficiencies 2016 GPhA CMC Workshop Bethesda, MD; May 18, 2016 Geoffrey Wu, PhD, CPH Lieutenant, US Public Health Service Associate Director for Science & Communication
More informationA Generic Industry Perspective on Establishing Impurity Limits And a Corresponding Control Strategy
A Generic Industry Perspective on Establishing Impurity Limits And a Corresponding Control Strategy Nicholas Cappuccino, PhD Vice-President, Head of Quality and Scientific Affairs Dr. Reddy s Laboratories,
More informationQuality by Design (QbD)
Evaluating the Critical Quality attributes & Critical Process Parameters-A Case Study-Tablets GMP International Workshop February 20/21, 2008 Mumbai, India Mukund Yelvigi Director, Therapeutic Area Management,
More informationQuality of raw materials and manufacturing of advanced therapies. Fouad Atouf, Ph.D. Head, Global Biologics July 12, 2018
Quality of raw materials and manufacturing of advanced therapies Fouad Atouf, Ph.D. Head, Global Biologics July 12, 2018 Evolution of the compendia 1820: a single recipe book 2018: Procedures and acceptance
More informationCHANGE CONTROL MANAGEMENT FOR A STABILITY PROGRAM
Potential Changes and Minimizing the Impact of Registration CHANGE CONTROL MANAGEMENT FOR A STABILITY PROGRAM Kim Huynh Ba Eecutive Director PHARMALYTIK www.pharmalytik.com Biography Kim Huynh Ba has over
More informationBCS, Biowaivers and Dissolution Test Methodologies
BCS, Biowaivers and Dissolution Test Methodologies Vinod P. Shah, Ph.D., FAAPS, FFIP Pharmaceutical Consultant, (Formerly with US FDA) North Potomac, MD., USA Disso Europe 2016 Romania Advances and Applications
More informationRegulatory Review Considerations of Drug-Linker Quality in ADCs
Regulatory Review Considerations of Drug-Linker Quality in ADCs Xiao Hong Chen, Ph.D. Acting Quality Assessment Lead Division of New Drug Products I, Branch II ONDP/OPQ/CDER/FDA Outlines ADC IND submissions
More informationAPI Testing Requirements to Support the EI Risk Assessment. Elisabeth Corbett Associate Director, GRS-CMC, Bristol-Myers Squibb November 9, 2016
API Testing Requirements to Support the EI Risk Assessment Elisabeth Corbett Associate Director, GRS-CMC, Bristol-Myers Squibb November 9, 2016 Agenda Background Review of ICH Q3D Risk Assessment Principles
More informationAntibody Drug Conjugates - Introduction to a new EBE initiative EBE Satellite Session Paris - May 9, 2016
Antibody Drug Conjugates - Introduction to a new EBE initiative EBE Satellite Session Paris - May 9, 2016 Presented by Fred Jacobson (Genentech) on behalf of the ADC task force How it got started... May
More informationPharmaceutical control strategy what does it mean and how do we apply? Martin Warman, Martin Warman Consultancy Ltd
Pharmaceutical control strategy what does it mean and how do we apply? Martin Warman, Martin Warman Consultancy Ltd How can the words control strategy cause such debate? Means totally different things
More informationApproval Review of Generic Drugs. Office of Generic/OTC Drugs, PMDA Kazuyuki SAITO, Ph.D.
Approval Review of Generic Drugs Office of Generic/OTC Drugs, PMDA Kazuyuki SAITO, Ph.D. Outline of Presentation Introduction Approval Review of Generic Drugs Equivalency review Conformity audit Conclusion
More informationMitigating Commercial Risks in Continuous Manufacturing Drug Product
Mitigating Commercial Risks in Continuous Manufacturing Drug Product Ian Leavesley Eli Lilly Indianapolis, Indiana Commercializing Continuous Processing in Pharma Boston, MA Jan 30 th Feb 1 st 2017 Outline
More informationThe European Pharmacopoeia
The European Pharmacopoeia General methods, Control of impurities, FP monographs, Pharmacopoeial harmonisation International workshop on the Chinese and the European Pharmacopoeias The new editions Dr.
More informationSESSION 11 Stability Data Evaluate, Set Specifications and Prepare Reports
SESSION 11 Stability Data Evaluate, Set Specifications and Prepare Reports Dan Willingmyre, Neha Frantz, Philip Pue-Gilchrist, Donnie Pulliam, Ketan Shah, and Brian K Nunnally Agenda Introduction Inputs
More informationCMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications. Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.
CMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. October 2011 1 Introduction Outline Brief overview of FDA drug approval pathways
More informationBiowaiver Approaches for Solid Oral Dosage Forms in New Drug Applications Poonam R. Delvadia, Ph.D. Division of Biopharmaceutics\ONDP\OPQ\CDER\FDA
Biowaiver Approaches for Solid Oral Dosage Forms in New Drug Applications Poonam R. Delvadia, Ph.D. Division of Biopharmaceutics\ONDP\OPQ\CDER\FDA PQRI BTC Webinar December 06, 2018 DISCLAIMER The presentation
More informationImplementation of PAT for Real Time Release Testing. Mark Smith Process Analytical Sciences Group Pfizer, Cork
Implementation of PAT for Real Time Release Testing Mark Smith Process Analytical Sciences Group Pfizer, Cork PAT at Pfizer A key enabler for transformational strategies and new quality paradigms 9 Delivering
More informationExtending Beyond Use Dating for Compounded Preparations Webinar Q&A
Stability Studies 1. If potency over time studies are not acceptable to extend BUD, then why is it offered? Potency point-in-time studies only indicate the potency of a compounded preparation at that specific
More informationá1225ñ VALIDATION OF COMPENDIAL PROCEDURES
1640 á1224ñ Transfer of Analytical Procedures / General Information USP 39 THE ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE The procedure should be written with sufficient detail and explicit instructions, so that a trained analyst
More informationHow to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs. Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER
How to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER 1 Structure of FDA Office of Commissioner Chief Scientist FOODS Medical Products & Tobacco
More informationSTABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS
More informationExtending Beyond Use Dating for Compounded Preparations Webinar Q&A
Stability Studies 1. If potency over time studies are not acceptable to extend BUD, then why is it offered? Potency point-in-time studies only indicate the potency of a compounded preparation at that specific
More informationWHO DRAFT PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT FOR MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
23 April 2008 Quality Assurance Programme Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines (QSM) Department of Medicines Policy and Standards (PSM) World Health Organization CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland WHO DRAFT
More informationCHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES OF ICHQ8 (PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT) AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE
CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES OF ICHQ8 (PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT) AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE Paul Stott, PhD Head of US Product Development AstraZeneca ICH Quality Guidelines Workshop BioKorea 2007 Sept 13-14
More informationQuality by Design, Revolution or Evolution? Wim Oostra
Quality by Design, Revolution or Evolution? Wim Oostra 1993 1998 2007 2009 2013 And many more.. Content Introduction A bit of history Examples A New product Legacy product Today? The triggers The goal
More informationImplementing Quality by Design Principles and Concepts to Drug Delivery and Formulation Development. S Betterman 15Apr2015
Implementing Quality by Design Principles and Concepts to Drug Delivery and Formulation Development S Betterman 15Apr2015 Agenda Background Implementation Strategy Infrastructure Building Project Application
More informationPHARMACEUTICAL TESTING
WHITEHOUSE, NJ PHARMACEUTICAL TESTING Pharmaceutical Expertise for GMP & CMC Testing Our Pharmaceutical Expertise With more than 20 years of experience in a variety of industries, our Whitehouse, New Jersey
More informationHow we set specifications for impurities (including Genotoxic impurities) 24 May 2017 Elisabeth Kovacs, Apotex CSO Chemistry and Analytical Sci.
2017 AAM CMC Workshop How we set specifications for impurities (including Genotoxic impurities) 24 May 2017 Elisabeth Kovacs, Apotex CSO Chemistry and Analytical Sci. The information within this presentation
More informationExperience with Health Canada s Approach for Post-Approval Changes. Kiran Krishnan Vice President US Regulatory Affairs September 2014
Experience with Health Canada s Approach for Post-Approval Changes Kiran Krishnan Vice President US Regulatory Affairs September 2014 Important Quotes to consider Dr. Janet Woodcock on desired state: A
More informationImpurities from degradation of Drug Substances
Impurities from degradation of Drug Substances REFERENCE 1. ICH - IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES - Q3A(R2) 2. ICH - IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS - Q3B(R2) 3. ICH - VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES:
More informationReview article Rapports De Pharmacie 2015;1(2):46-53 ISSN:
Review article Rapports De Pharmacie 2015;1(2):46-53 ISSN: 2455-0507 ABSTRACT APPLICATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT IN PRODUCT QUALITY LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Subin Sankarankutty Regulatory Consultant, Health Sciences
More informationExtractables and leachables: An Introduction
Extractables and leachables: An Introduction Tim Hulme Smithers Rapra THulme@smithers.com 44(0)1939 252 418 1 Extractables and leachables: An Introduction Tim Hulme Smithers Rapra thulme@smithers.com 2
More informationValidation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Process Focus: APIs.
Validation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Process Focus: APIs Validations: Regulatory History (US FDA) Sterilisation 1977 Aseptic processing 1979 Water Systems 1981 Non-sterile Mfg Process 1987 Revised
More informationMedicine Variations Guideline
Medicine Variations Guideline National Health Regulatory Authority (NHRA) Kingdom of Bahrain 30 th March 2017 Version 2.0 Chief of Pharmaceutical Product Regulation: Dr/Roaya Al Abbasi Date: NHRA CEO Approval:
More informationMedicines Variations Guideline
Medicines Variations Guideline National Health Regulatory Authority (NHRA) Kingdom of Bahrain 27/08/2014 Version 1.1 Chief of Pharmaceutical Product Regulation: Dr / Roaya Al Abbasi Date: NHRA CEO Approval:
More informationI. DEFINITION This training under Kilimanjaro School of Pharmacy Industrial Pharmacy Teaching Unit (IPTU) is an Advanced Training Program in Drug Development, Drug Manufacturing, Regulatory & Quality Compliance.
More informationUSP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)
USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new) Sally W. Schwarz, MS, BCNP Research Associate Professor of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO Why USP Chapter ? FDA has
More informationWhy Q3D? Elemental Impurities: Is Your Company Prepared for ICH Q3D
Elemental Impurities: Is Your Company Prepared for ICH Q3D J. Skutnik-Wilkinson VP NSF Health Sciences Pharma Biotech Q3D EWG member Quality Session 2 May 13, 2014 Why Q3D? Pharmacopoeias going in different
More informationPredictability & Performance Through the Product Lifecycle Thought Provoking Perspectives
Quality by Design & Clinical Relevance: Moving Forward Predictability & Performance Through the Product Lifecycle Thought Provoking Perspectives Roger Nosal 1 & Ravi Shanker 2 1 Vice President & Head Global
More informationApplied Process Understanding in Drug Product Development
Applied Process Understanding in Drug Product Development A combined pharmaceutical science, materials science and chemical process engineering approach 17 October, Heidelberg, Germany ir Sander van den
More informationOverview of Cleaning Validation in Pharmaceutical Industry
Overview of Cleaning Validation in Pharmaceutical Industry 1 Pankaj P Chandra Treya, 2 Dr. D N Jhade 1 Research Scholar, SSSUTMS, Sehore 2 Research Guide, SSSUTMS, Sehore Abstract Manufacturing of Pharmaceutical
More informationRegulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017
Regulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017 Hugo Hamel, Senior Biologist/Evaluator, BGTD Overview of the Post-NOC Changes
More informationAdopted by CHMP for release for consultation 15 December Start of public consultation 15 December 2016
1 September 2017 EMA/CHMP/ICH/809509/2016 Committee for Human Medicinal Products ICH guideline Q11 on development and manufacture of drug substances (chemical entities and biotechnological / biological
More information