FastGene Optima. Products for PCR. proof-reading. ReadyMix. cdna SNP. routine PCR. polymerase. optimized blend complex templates. N gene knock out B O

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "FastGene Optima. Products for PCR. proof-reading. ReadyMix. cdna SNP. routine PCR. polymerase. optimized blend complex templates. N gene knock out B O"

Audrey Walton
5 years ago
Views:

tissuebest results genotyping SNP routine PCR mouse tail very pure

ReadyMix multiplex PCR long range optimized blend complex templates cdna

1 Products for PCR efficiency polymerase convenience endpoint PCR incl. loading dye direct PCR incl. dntps engineered enzyme archeal type B polymerase high GC content FastGene tissuebest results genotyping SNP routine PCR mouse tail very pure high-thoughput proof-reading HotStArt low copy N gene knock out TI B O DY ReadyMix multiplex PCR long range optimized blend complex templates cdna FastGene (#LS28, 250 units incl. dntps) FastGene HotStart ReadyMix (#LS29, 500 x 25 µl reactions) Distributed by: Tel.: Fax : info@bulldog-bio.com Web:

2 FastGene HotStart ReadyMix for the Genotyping of knock-out mice PCR is essential for us to detect gene-knock out. The FastGene HotStart ReadyMix suppressed non-specific amplififcation and produced easy to analyze results. Inexperienced freshman students of the medical school could successfully perform genotyping without making any mistakes. The following data were provided by the courtesy of Dr. Mamoru Aoto Department of Circulatory Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Japan. Extraction of DNA from a 2 mm mouse tail tissue: 75 µl Alkaline Lysis Buffer 25 mm NaOH+ 0.2mM EDTA Incubate at 95 C for 30 min Cool down to 4 C 75 µl Neutralization Buffer 40 mm TrisHCl, ph 5 Vortex well Take 1 µl PCR 1. FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye (#LS29) 2. Competitor T s enzyme ready mix with loading dye 1 µl of DNA isolated from mouse tail tissue ~163 bp FastGene HotStart ReadyMix (10 µm) 2.5 µl mouse tail DNA 1 µl 2 x Master Mix with enzymes and loading dye 12.5 µl O 9 µl Competitor T s polymerase (10µM) 2.5 µl mouse tail DNA 1 µl 10 x Buffer 2.5 µl MgCl (2.5 mm) 2 µl dntp (2.5 mm) 4 µl PCR enzyme mixture 0.25 µl O 39.3 µl T100 Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD) Initial denaturation 95 C 3 min Denaturation 95 C 15 sec Annealing 55 C 15 sec Extension 72 C 15 sec Final Extension 72 C 5 min Concentration of Agarose 1 % 100 V 30 min Sample volume 10 µl FastGene HotStart ReadyMix Competitor T s ready mix The PCR specificity and easiness to use the kits were analyzed for FastGene HotStart ReadyMix and a competitor. The results can be summarized as follows: FastGene HotStart ReadyMix did not show non-specific amplicons. Competitor resulted in the presence of a large non-specific band. Amplifcation efficiency was equally high for both enzymes. PCR preparation was very easy with the ReadyMix. Electrophoresis was easily done since it already contained a loading dye. 163 bp

3 FastGene for the Amplification of GC-Rich DNA We saw less of non-specific amplification with GC-Rich fragments when using the FastGene. The sequencing results were at least comparable to those of competitor T s long amplicon reagent mixture. The following data were provided by the courtesy of Ms. Ryoko Nakayama Department of Pathology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Japan. The comparison of FastGene was done with a polymerase mixture designed for long amplifications from competitor T. Amplification of two GC-rich amplicons were done using the following reaction mixture: 1. Competitor T enzyme Mix 2. FastGene (#LS28) cdna was created by reverse transcribing RNA isolated from a cell line of human origin PCR product size and GC-content: bp and 60.7% bp and 64,3% Initial denaturation 94 C 5 min Competitor T s Polymerase mixture for large amplicons FastGene Denaturation 94 C 30 sec Annealing 58 C 30sec Extension 72 C 2 min 1 µl 1 µl 1 µl 1 µl Final Extension 72 C 7 min cdna of a human cell line 2 µl 0.5 µl cdna of a human cell line 2 µl 0.5 µl 2 x Buffer (GC-rich template) 12.5 µl 12.5 µl 5 x Buffer (GC-rich template) 5 µl 5 µl MgCl µl 2.5 µl dntp 2 µl 2 µl dntp 1 µl 1 µl Enzyme mixture 0.2 µl 0.2 µl FastGene 0.1 µl 0.1 µl O 7.3 µl 8.8 µl O 13.4 µl 14.9 µl Competitor T s mixture for long amplicons 1 FastGene 2 GAPDH 1 2 GAPDH Competitor T s reagent and FastGene successfully amplified fragment (1) and (2). The specificity of both enzyme mixtures was high for both amplicons. Amplified fragments were inserted into T-easy vector and transformed into E. coli. A selection of clones were send for sequencing to determine the number of mutations. 1 2 Sequence Competitor T Clone No. Determined sequence (bp) Number of mutation Competitor T Number of mutation per Kb Mutations were found in both enzyme mixtures. We analyzed however only a limited number of clones. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate the accuracy. Nonetheless, FastGene had less mutations in when compared to competitor T.

FastGene HotStart ReadyMix for the Direct PCR from Escherichia coli colonies The PCR products using the FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye resulted in a clearer electrophoresis pattern when

This is interesting, since the starting material (1 colony) was very similar. The starting amount was probably inadequate for Comparison the competitor s of the enzyme.

between colonies with insert (~800 bp) and without (~300 bp). Interestingly, good results were obtained using only 12.5 µl of reaction volume.

4 FastGene HotStart ReadyMix for the Direct PCR from Escherichia coli colonies The PCR products using the FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye resulted in a clearer electrophoresis pattern when compared to competitor T s ready mix, since no smearing was observed. This smearing observed with the competitor s ready mix made the determination of the presence of the insert quite difficult. This is interesting, since the starting material (1 colony) was very similar. The starting amount was probably inadequate for Comparison the competitor s of the enzyme. FastGene For the FastGene and a polyermase HotStart mixture ReadyMix of this a was competitor clearly not T was the performed case since using one could the clearly following distinguish conditions: between colonies with insert (~800 bp) and without (~300 bp). Interestingly, good results were obtained using only 12.5 µl of reaction volume. The following data were provided by an institutional customer in Japan. 1. FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye (#LS29) 2. Competitor T s enzyme ready mix with loading dye 24 transformed Escherichia coli colonies for each ready mix ~800 bp (with insert) or ~300 bp (without insert) Thermal Cycler Dice (Takara) PCR Setup (for both polymerases): FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye or Competitor T s ready mix with loading dye 0.5 µl (0.25µM) E. coli colony directly added to the reaction 1 2 x Master Mix with enzymes and loading dye 6.25 µl O 5.75 µl Total 12,5 µl Initial denaturation 95 C 5 min Denaturation 95 C 30 sec Annealing 55 C 30 sec Extension 72 C 2 min Final Extension 72 C 5 min Concentration of TAE- Agarose 1.2 % 135 V 30 min Sample volume 5 µl FastGene HotStart ReadyMix with loading dye Competitor T s ready mix with loading dye 800 bp 300 bp The electrophoresis pattern looked much better with FastGene HotStart ReadyMix, when compared to the results obtained using the competitor s ready mix. Additionally, more primer dimers were observed when using the competitor s ready mix.

FastGene for the Amplification of complex DNA Templates Almost no primer dimer were observed when using FastGene, especially when compared with competitor T s enzyme mixture.

Comparison of the FastGene and a polyermase mixture of a competitor T was performed using the following conditions: 1. Competitor T enzyme Mix 2.

1030 bp Initial denaturation 94 C 2 min GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (ABI) Denaturation 94 C 1 min Annealing 59 C 45 sec Extension 72 C 1 min Competitor T s polymerase mixture for complex templates

5 FastGene for the Amplification of complex DNA Templates Almost no primer dimer were observed when using FastGene, especially when compared with competitor T s enzyme mixture. The amplification efficiency of the FastGene was high as well. The following data were provided by an institutional customer in Japan. Comparison of the FastGene and a polyermase mixture of a competitor T was performed using the following conditions: 1. Competitor T enzyme Mix 2. FastGene (#LS28) cdna was created by reverse transcribing RNA isolated from catshark liver tissue bp Initial denaturation 94 C 2 min GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (ABI) Denaturation 94 C 1 min Annealing 59 C 45 sec Extension 72 C 1 min Competitor T s polymerase mixture for complex templates FastGene Final Extension 72 C 10 min complex catshark s liver cdna 1 µl (0.5µM) 0.5 µl (5ng) 10 x Buffer 5 µl dntp 4 µl PCR enzyme mixture 0.2 µl O 39.3 µl complex catshark s liver cdna 1 µl (0.5µM) 0.5 µl (5ng) 5 x Buffer 10 µl MgCl 2 4 µl dntp 1.5 µl FastGene 0.2 µl O 32.8 µl Concentration of Agarose 1.2 % 100 V 35 min Sample volume 20 µl (bp) 3,000 1,000 1,030bp 500 T T info@bulldog-bio.com

PlantDirect TM Multiplex PCR System

PlantDirect TM Multiplex PCR System Technical Manual No. 0178 Version 10112010 I Description.. 1 II Applications 2 III Key Features.. 3 IV Shipping and Storage. 3 V Simplified Procedures. 3 VI Detailed