2013 Kansas Performance Tests with. Sunflower Hybrids. summer fallow dryland irrigated. Report of Progress 1096

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2013 Kansas Performance Tests with. Sunflower Hybrids. summer fallow dryland irrigated. Report of Progress 1096"

Transcription

1 213 Kansas Performance Tests with Sunflower Hybrids summer fallow dryland irrigated Report of Progress 196 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Test Objectives and Procedures... 1 Data Interpretation... 1 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS OILSEED TESTS Table 1. Colby Fallow, Thomas County...2 Table 2. Colby Irrigated, Thomas County...4 Table 3. Parsons Dryland, Labette County...6 Table 4. Hays Dryland, Ellis County...7 CONFECTIONARY TESTS Table 5. Colby Fallow, Thomas County...8 Table 6. Colby Irrigated, Thomas County...9 ENTRANTS AND ENTRIES IN 213 TESTS Table Electronic Access, University Research Policy, and Duplication Policy...11 Contribution No S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. - i -

3 INTRODUCTION Objectives and Procedures Sunflower performance tests were conducted in 213 by the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station to provide farmers, extension workers, and private industry with unbiased agronomic information on many of the sunflower hybrids marketed in the state. Tests were financed in part by entry fees from private companies. Companies known to be developing and marketing sunflowers were invited to participate and enter hybrids on a voluntary, fee-entry basis. As a result, not all hybrids grown in the state were included in the tests, and hybrids were not grown uniformly at all locations. Test locations in 213 were Thomas County-irrigated and fallow; Greely County-irrigated; Ellis County-dryland; and Labette and Reno Counties-dryland. Oilseed entries were grown at all locations. Confectionary entries were evaluated in Thomas County-irrigated and fallow; Greeley County-irrigated; and Labette County-dryland. Oilseed and confectionary entries were planted separately in all tests. Entries were planted in four-row, replicated plots at all locations. To ensure uniform and adequate stands, all tests except those in Thomas County were planted at a high seeding rate and were hand-thinned after emergence to desired stands. Tests in Thomas County were planted to stand with a modified Monosem Vacuum Planter. Environmental factors affecting test results and cultural practices are presented for each individual test site. The irrigated oilseed test at Greeley County were abandoned for adverse conditions during the growing season. Test results for 213 and period-of-years average data are included in Tables 1 through 6. Entrants and entries in 213 tests are listed in Table 7. Data Interpretation Yields are reported as pounds of seed per acre adjusted to 1% moisture content. Days to half bloom is the number of days from date of planting to the date when 5% of plants are in bloom. Lodging percentage is based on counts of lodged and total plants in harvested areas at all locations. Oil percentage was obtained from samples submitted under code number to the Kansas Grain Inspection Service for analysis and is reported on a 1% moisture basis. Samples for all tests were derived by compositing replications by entry for each location and subsampling. Oil yields are reported as net pounds of oil per acre. Seed-size percentage analysis for confectionary-type entries was performed at the Northwest Research- Extension Center on cleaned samples submitted from each of the tests. Separation by seed size was made by screening a weighed sample through a series of six sieves (22/64, 21/64, 2/64, 19/64, 18/64, and 16/64-round holes) secured on a Ro-Tap mechanical shaker. Statistical analysis: Conducting perfect tests is virtually impossible because soil fertility, moisture, and other environmental factors vary. Therefore, small differences in results might have no real meaning. To help interpret data, we applied a statistical technique, analysis of variance, whenever possible. Such analysis requires repeating whole sets of varieties or treatments several times and placing individual varieties or treatments as they would be placed by chance alone. Results of the analyses are reported in terms of least significant differences (LSD). If two means differ by more than the LSD (.5), such a difference would be due to chance variation only 5% of the time. So, it's 95% probable that the difference was due to treatment. If means do not differ by as much as the LSD, little confidence can be placed in the importance of varietal or treatment differences. The coefficient of variability (CV) represents an estimate of the precision of replicated yield trials. Trials with a CV ranging from 1% to 15% are usually acceptable for performance comparisons. Trials with a CV greater than 15% provide only a rough guide to hybrid performance. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cooperation of research center personnel who performed many of the field operations is sincerely appreciated. Vicki Brown, secretary, and Jane Lingenfelser, Kansas Crop Performance Tests coordinator, assisted in preparing this report, and temporary workers Michael Schiferl and Danielle Foster helped with seed counting, plot thinning, and maintenance. Mary Knapp at the Weather Data Library provided climatological data

4 NORTHWEST FALLOW OILSEED SUNFLOWER TEST Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby; Patrick Evans, agronomist Keith silt loam; fallow in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/12/213; Harvested on 9/3/213 Target stand of 17, plants/acre; 12.3 in. spacing Dry during the summer, but conditions improved after the first of August. for spider mites. Month Precipitation Average Temp. GDU 213 Norm. 213 Norm. 213 Norm. Nov.-Mar April May June July August Sep.-Oct Totals: ,574 3, Precipitation (inches) cumulative Daily Temperatures (F) 2 plant silk harvest daily Table 1. Colby Fallow Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Croplan Genetics 13-8E Croplan Genetics 13-52E Croplan Genetics 13-59CL Croplan Genetics CL Croplan Genetics 13-86E Croplan Genetics CG 432ENS Croplan Genetics CG 46 E NS Croplan Genetics CG 548CLDMRNS Croplan Genetics CG 559CLDMRNS Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Mycogen 8N Mycogen 8N 668S Seeds 2 Camaro II Seeds 2 Cobalt II Seeds 2 Falcon NS/SU Seeds 2 Hornet Seeds 2 NLK12M Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/Dm Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph s Triumph s651cld Triumph s849cld Triumph s859cl Triumph s

5 Table 1 continued. Colby Fallow Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Triumph s Triumph s87cl AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other. 2-Year Averages (212 and 213) Croplan Genetics CG 432ENS Croplan Genetics CG 46 E NS Croplan Genetics CG 548CLDMRNS Croplan Genetics CG 559CLDMRNS Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/Dm Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph s Triumph s AVERAGES

6 NORTHWEST IRRIGATED OILSEED SUNFLOWER TEST Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby; Patrick Evans, agronomist Keith silt loam; corn in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/11/213; Harvested on 1/11/213 Target stand of 17, plants/acre; 12.3 in. spacing Dry during the summer, but conditions improved after the first of August. for spider mites. Month Precipitation Average Temp. GDU 213 Norm. 213 Norm. 213 Norm. Nov.-Mar April May June July August Sep.-Oct Totals: ,574 3, Precipitation (inches) cumulative Daily Temperatures (F) 2 plant silk harvest daily Table 2. Colby Irrigated Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Croplan Genetics 13-8E Croplan Genetics CL Croplan Genetics 13-52E Croplan Genetics 13-59CL Croplan Genetics 13-86E Croplan Genetics CG 432ENS Croplan Genetics CG 46 E NS Croplan Genetics CG 548CLDMRNS Croplan Genetics CG 559CLDMRNS Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Genosys 12E Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Mycogen 8N Mycogen 8N 668S Seeds 2 Camaro II Seeds 2 Cobalt II Seeds 2 Falcon NS/SU Seeds 2 Hornet Seeds 2 NLK12M Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/DM Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph Triumph 651CLD Triumph 849CLD Triumph 859CL Triumph s

7 Table 2 continued. Colby Irrigated Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Triumph s Triumph s87cl Triumph TRX12435CD AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other. 2-Year Averages (212 and 213) Croplan Genetics CG 432ENS Croplan Genetics CG 46 E NS Croplan Genetics CG 548CLDMRNS Croplan Genetics CG 559CLDMRNS Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/DM Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph s Triumph s AVERAGES

8 SOUTHEAST DRYLAND OILSEED SUNFLOWER TEST Southeast Agricultural Research Center; Kelly Kusel, research technician Parsons silt loam; wheat in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/28/213; Harvested on 12/17/213 Target stand of 17,4 plants/acre; 12. in. spacing Good stands were obtained for the conditions. Summer was very hot and dry. Late July and early August rain very beneficial to test. Month Precipitation Average Temp. GDU 213 Norm. 213 Norm. 213 Norm. Nov.-Mar April May June July August Sep.-Oct Totals: ,941 3, Precipitation (inches) cumulative Daily Temperatures (F) 2 plant silk harvest daily Table 3. Parsons Dryland Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Mycogen 8N Mycogen 8N 668S Seeds 2 Hornet Seeds 2 NLK12M Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/DM Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph 651CLD Triumph 849CLD Triumph 859CL Triumph s87cl AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other. 2-Year Averages (211 and 213) Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Mycogen 8N AVERAGES

9 WEST DRYLAND OILSEED SUNFLOWER TEST Agricultural Research Center, Hays; Wayne Aschwege, technician Harney silt loam; fallow in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/17/213; Harvested on 1/28/213 Target stand of 17,4 plants/acre; 12. in. spacing Emergence was erratic with some plots emerging a week after others. Summer was hot and dry. Month Precipitation Average Temp. GDU 213 Norm. 213 Norm. 213 Norm. Nov.-Mar April May June July August Sept Oct Totals: ,73 6,488 Table 4. Hays Dryland Oilseed Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Daily Temperatures (F) Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Croplan Genetics 13-8E Croplan Genetics 13-52E Croplan Genetics 13-59CL Croplan Genetics CL Croplan Genetics 13-86E Croplan Genetics CG 432ENS Croplan Genetics CG 46 E NS Croplan Genetics CG 548CLDMRNS Croplan Genetics CG 559CLDMRNS Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N 421 CLDM Mycogen 8N Mycogen 8N 668S Seeds 2 Hornet Seeds 2 NLK12M Seeds 2 Torino Syngenta 3158NS/CL/DM Syngenta 3733NS/DM Syngenta 3845NS Triumph Triumph 651CLD Triumph s Triumph s AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other Precipitation (inches) cumulative daily 2 plant bloom harvest Year Averages (21 and 213) Mycogen 8H 449CLDM Mycogen 8N Syngenta 3845NS Triumph s Triumph s AVERAGES

10 NORTHWEST FALLOW CONFECTIONARY SUNFLOWER TEST Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby; Patrick Evans, agronomist Keith silt loam; fallow in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/12/213; Harvested on 9/3/213 Target stand of 17, plants/acre; 12. in. spacing Dry during the summer, but conditions improved after the first of August. after the first of August. Table 5. Colby Fallow Confectionary Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Genosys 12GCF Genosys 12GCF Mycogen 8C 451CP Seeds 2 Jaguar II CL Seeds 2 X4334 CL Sunopta/Dahlgren Sunopta/Dahlgren Sunopta/Dahlgren 956CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 953CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 9589CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 9592CL AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other. 2-Year Averages (21 and 213) Mycogen 8C 451CP AVERAGES

11 NORTHWEST IRRIGATED CONFECTIONARY SUNFLOWER TEST Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby; Patrick Evans, agronomist Keith silt loam; corn in lb/a N, P, K Planted on 6/11/213; Harvested on 1/11/213 Target stand of 17, plants/acre; 12. in. spacing Dry during the summer, but conditions improved after the first of August. after the first of August. Table 6. Colby Irrigated Confectionary Sunflower Performance Test, 213 Brand Hybrid (lb/a) average (%) (lb/a) bloom (in.) (%) (lb/bu) (g/2) Mycogen 8C 451CP NUSEED GLOBAL NUSEED GLOBAL NHW NUSEED GLOBAL NHW NUSEED GLOBAL NHW NUSEED GLOBAL NHW NUSEED GLOBAL NHW NUSEED GLOBAL NHW RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES 2215CL Seeds 2 Jaguar CL Seeds 2 Jaguar II CL Seeds 2 Jaguar XL Seeds 2 NSK12M Seeds 2 X4334 CL Sunopta/Dahlgren Sunopta/Dahlgren Sunopta/Dahlgren 956CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 953CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 9589CL Sunopta/Dahlgren 9592CL Triumph 751CD Triumph 77CL AVERAGES CV (%) LSD (.5)* * Unless two varieties differ by more than the LSD, little confidence can be placed in one being superior to the other. 2-Year Averages (212 and 213) Mycogen 8C 451CP RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES 2215CL Seeds 2 Jaguar CL Seeds 2 Jaguar II CL Seeds 2 X4334 CL Triumph 751CD Triumph 77CL AVERAGES Year Averages (21, 212 and 213) Mycogen 8C 451CP RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES RED R. COMMODITIES Seeds 2 Jaguar CL Triumph 77CL AVERAGES

12 Table 7. Entrants and Entries in the 213 Sunflower Performance Tests Croplan Genetics P.O. Box St. Paul, MN E 13-52E 13-59CL 13-86E CG 432ENS CG 548CLDMRNS CG 559CLDMRNS CG 46 ENS Nuseed Global 1191 South Austin Ave. Alsip, IL NHW11914 NHW1273 NHW1273 NHW12731 NHW12734 NHW12735 Sunopta/Dahlgren 731 Ohms Lane, Ste. 6 Edina, MN CL CL CL 9592CL+ Genosys 1854 NDSU Research Circle North Fargo, ND E6 12E12 12E13 12E14 12GCF5 12GCF12 Red River Commodities 132 East College Dr. Colby, KS CL Syngenta Seeds 1155 Wayzata Blvd. Minnetonka, MN NS/CL/DM 3733 NS/DM 3845 NS Mycogen Seed 933 Zionsville Rd Indianapolis, IN MYCOGEN 8C 451CP 8H 449 CLDM 8N 421 CLDM 8N 51 8N 668S Seeds 2 PO Box 2 Breckenridge, MN Camaro II Cobalt II Falcon NS/SU Hornet Jaguar CL Jaguar II CL Jaguar XL NLK12M8 NSK12M48 Torino X4334 CL Triumph Seed Co., Inc. PO Box 15 Ralls, TX CLD 751CD 77CL 849CLD 859CL s668 s673 s87cl TRX12435CD - 1 -

13 To access crop performance testing information electronically, visit our website. The information contained in this publication, plus more, is available for viewing or downloading at: Excerpts from the University Research Policy Agreement with Cooperating Seed Companies Permission is hereby given to Kansas State University (KSU) to test varieties and/or hybrids designated on the attached entry forms in the manner indicated in the test announcements. I certify that seed submitted for testing is a true sample of the seed being offered for sale. I understand that all results from Kansas Crop Performance Tests belong to the University and the public and shall be controlled by the University so as to produce the greatest benefit to the public. Performance data may be used in the following ways: 1) Tables may be reproduced in their entirety provided the source is referenced and data are not manipulated or reinterpreted; 2) Advertising statements by an individual company about the performance of its entries may be made as long as they are accurate statements about the data as published, with no reference to other companies names or cultivars. In both cases, the following must be included with the reprint or ad citing the appropriate publication number and title: See the official Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service Report of Progress 196, 213 Kansas Performance Tests with Sunflower Hybrids, or the Kansas Crop Performance Test website, for details. Endorsement or recommendation by Kansas State University is not implied. Contributors Patrick Evans, Research Technologist (Senior Author), Colby Jane Lingenfelser, Assistant Agronomist, Manhattan Mary Knapp, Kansas State Climatologist, Manhattan Alan Schlegel, Agronomist, Tribune Kelly Kusel, Technician, Parsons Gary Cramer, Agronomist, Hutchinson Wayne Aschwege, Technician, Hays Copyright 214 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, give credit to the author(s), 213 Kansas Performance Tests with Sunflower Hybrids, Kansas State University, February 214. Contribution no S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. Publications from Kansas State University are available at: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service SRP196 February 214 K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 5