Community Lifecycle Infrastructure Costing Tool. GFOA BC 2016 Conference. Narissa Chadwick: MCSCD Kim Fowler: Sustainability Makes Cents Consulting

Transcription

1 Community Lifecycle Infrastructure Costing Tool GFOA BC 2016 Conference Narissa Chadwick: MCSCD Kim Fowler: Sustainability Makes Cents Consulting

2 Integrating Financial & Land Use Planning through Asset Management Financial health and sustainability of our communities is at risk Financial officers should be involved in land use planning and planners involved in financial management = integration Financial assessment tools necessary to achieve sustainable development Key is asset management

3 Where are we? $200 bil infrastructure deficit ($13,870/household) 60% of Canada s core public infrastructure is owned and maintained by municipal governments Not able to address existing needs

4 Where are we? 35% of assets in poor condition 2016 Infrastructure Report Card 26% 32% 21% 22% Potable water Declining Wastewater Declining Stormwater Declining Roads Declining 25% 17% 19% 17% Bridges Declining Buildings Declining Sports & Rec. Declining Public Transit Unavailable

5 Cost of Sprawl

6 How did we get there? - Siloed ECON. DEV Attracting businesses & people Huh? PLANNING Population Projections Land Supply Nothing to do with me ENGINEERING Servicing Land Conventional Standards Operations (and maintenance?) in silos Told you so FINANCE $ for new capital costs $ for operations (and maintenance?) With what money??

7 How did we get here? - Reactive Waiting until asset fails or requires major renewal Stantec Consulting

8 How did we get there? Short-term Supporting land-use decisions that don t consider comparative or lifecycle infrastructure costs Failing to fully recover costs and fees Not reporting on infrastructure deficits Stantec Consulting

9 Status Quo If we continue on this path. Increasing infrastructure deficits leading to significant reductions in levels of service & increases in property taxes Inefficient management of local government services Disconnection of organizational priorities from its budget Marginalization of land use planning Increased severity of damage from climate change events

10

11

12 City of Edmonton s Growth Impact Tool Developer s Cost (DCCs) City s Cost

13 Integrated Solutions

14 Effective Asset Management How do we achieve sustainable service delivery? What do we own? Where is it? What is it worth? INVENTORY CONDITION What condition is it in? What do we need to do to it and when? How much money do we need? Effective Asset Management RISK LEVELS OF SERVICE What are the consequences? Where are we vulnerable? Do we still need it? What do regulators require? What are public s expectations?

15 Effective Asset Management

16 CLIC -Overview

17 SELECT SCENARIO Note: It will take a few seconds to populate the relevant data when the scenario is changed COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING click 'Main Menu' above. If you want to modify the scenario under a DECISION NEW name, enter the new name SUPPORT TOOL STEP 1: SELECT/CREATE/DELETE SCENARIO SELECT SCENARIO Choose the scenario that best reflects the characteristics of the development scenario you wish to explore. See below for a brief description of each of the six built-in scenarios F Name / Description Inner Core / Medium Density NEW Name / Description Save NEW Name Scenario # Creates Main a Menu copy of the scenario selected. This step is mandatory if the user wants to modify scenarios 1 to 6. Note: It will take a few seconds to populate the relevant data when the scenario is changed Choose the scenario that best reflects If the you characteristics want to delete the of scenario the development selected above, scenario click on you Delete wish Scenario to explore. F See below for a brief description of each of the six built-in scenarios Delete Scenario The scenario establishes F a Deletes starting the point scenario for selected. development Scenarios parameters. 1 to 6 cannot be deleted. Name / Description Scenario # The parameters of this scenario can be modified in subsequent steps. Inner Core / Medium Density F Scenarios 1 to 6 must be saved under a NEW name before they can be modified. To view the results of a default scenario, select the scenario and DEFAULT BUILT-IN SCENARIOS - DESCRIPTION click 'Main Menu' above. F F The scenario establishes a starting point for development parameters. The parameters of this scenario can be modified in subsequent steps. Scenarios 1 to 6 must be saved under a NEW name before they can be modified. To view the results of a default scenario, select the scenario and Scenarios If you want to modify the scenario under a NEW name, enter the new name NEW Name / Description Scenario 1 F Scenario 2 Creates a copy of the scenario selected. This step is mandatory if the user wants to modify scenarios 1 to 6. Scenario 3 Save NEW Name If you want to delete the scenario selected above, click on Delete Scenario Delete Scenario Higher Density Mixed Use Neighbourhood in the Inner Core characterized by: - Primarily Inner low rise and core high rise apartments : - Mixed-use development - Grid road netw ork - High level of transit service High density F Medium Density Neighbourhood in the Inner Core characterized by: - Mix of tow nhouses, apartments and single-detached Inner core : housing - Mixed-use development - High level of transit service - Possible brow nfield development Medium density Medium Density Neighbourhood in Inner Suburbs characterized by: - Mix of tow nhouses, low rise apts and single-detached Inner suburb : housing - Mixed-use development - Mainly Grid road netw ork - Good level of transit service Medium density Deletes the scenario selected. Scenarios 1 to 6 cannot be deleted. DEFAULT BUILT-IN SCENARIOS - DESCRIPTION Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Inner suburb : Outer suburb: Medium Density Neighbourhood in Outer Suburbs characterized by: - Mix of tow nhouses, low rise apts and single-detached Outer suburb: Low density Low Density neighbourhood in Outer Suburbs characterized by: - Primarily single detached housing Low Density neighbourhood in Inner Suburbs characterized by: - Primarily single detached w ith some semidetached/townhouses Insert Your housing - Primarily single-use (residential) development) - Mixed-use development - Curvilinear Scenario Low road 1 density netw ork Company Logo - Mainly - Moderate transit service Scenario Medium Grid road netw ork - Low levels of transit service - Good transit service 2 density Scenario 3 Here - Primarily single-use (residential) development) - Curvilinear road netw ork

18

19

20 Unit Costs & Revenues

21 Development Characteristics

22 Cost Allocation Cost Savings and Replacement User Defined Costs

23 Results

24 Results

25 Compare Scenarios

26 Compare Scenarios

27 The CLIC Story Initial Capital Cost Lifecycle Cost Per Capita/Household Cost

28 A Key Solution: Use Financial Tools and Incentives Revealing: CLIC Asset Management Eco-Asset Management Long-term Fiscal Management Next Stage: DCCs RTE Application User Fees Self funding utilities Local area service tax

29

30 References CLIC and other Tools: able_development.htm Asset Management BC: Eco-Asset Management: PIBC conference materials:

31 Acknowledgements Funding Partners: Visuals: OSM Illustration susanmilley.com

32 Questions & Contacts What are your challenges or concerns with integration? What involvement do you have in land use planning decisions? What dialogue are you having within your local government? With your community? How are you addressing your infrastructure deficit?