ATMGE/ 21 Budapest, September Agenda Item 2 - ASBU Monitoring and Reporting. Ana Paula FRANGOLHO EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL

Transcription

1 ATMGE/ 21 Budapest, September 2015 Agenda Item 2 - ASBU Monitoring and Reporting Ana Paula FRANGOLHO EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL

2 WHO AM I? Ana Paula FRANGOLHO Background/CV in a nutshell: About 16 years in EUROCONTROL: DPS/PEPR Unit (since Fev 2011) LSSIP Contact person (RO,BG,MD and UA) Advisor for Objectives (ADQ, INF,TOD) ICAO Reporting SESAR Deployment (Level 1) Coordinator Methods and Quality SESAR WPB (Target Concept and Architecture) Task Leader Working in cooperation with WPC.2 (Deployment) and WPC.3 (standardisation & regulatory roadmap) AIM (Aeronautical Information Management) and SWIM Development of Information Management Strategy and AIM Action Plan Managing AIM activity in DMEAN Secretary of the Aeronautical Information Team Chair of EUROCAE/RTCA, AIS Data Link committee EAD (European AIS Database) Migration & Transition Manager Project Manager AHEAD Programme About 19 years NAV Portugal Project Manager- GNSS (EGNOS), ATC, COM, AIS Advisor and representative in ICAO and EUROCONTROL fora EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 2

3 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 3

4 Master Plan the 3 levels ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 (draft Jul 2015) ESSIP Report for 2014 (final Jun 2015-) EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 4

5 activities are based on an annual cycle ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism European Implementation Plan Covers the ATM MP and the SDM DP and where needed ESSIP Plan some elements of the Network Strategy Plan SES prerequisites (DLS,etc..) Governance: SJU-WPC (MP Maintenance) EUROCONTROL Provisional Council Level 3 of the Master Plan Show progress and plans at European level ESSIP Report recognised to be one of ESSIP Report the two parts of MP Level 3 Both SJU WPC.2 and EUROCONTROL deliverable Challenge: Reality check reported by LSSIP documents national Stakeholders of the European Implementation Plan: National Stakeholders (41 States+ sign and commit to the documents MUAC) Situation end of the year Evolution over the past year Plans for next years until achievement of each individual ESSIP Objective PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 5

6 PEPR activities are based on an annual cycle PEPR functioning Level 3 of the Master Plan = [ESSIP Plan + ESSIP Report] ESSIP Plan ESSIP Report LSSIP documents (41 States+ MUAC) PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 6

7 ESSIP Plan Document ESSIP European Single Sky ImPlementation Plans for next 5-7 years Official deliverable of SJU and EUROCONTROL Under the aegis of the SESAR WPC.02 ESSIP Plan includes: Implementation Objectives Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) E.g. for 2015 cycle: 41 Active Objectives Types of Objectives: SESAR (41), SES (7), PCP (21) ESSIP Plan: PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 7

8 activities are based on an annual cycle ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism Level 3 of the Master Plan = [ESSIP Plan + ESSIP Report] ESSIP Plan ESSIP Report LSSIP documents (41 States+ MUAC) PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 8

9 LSSIP Documents LSSIP Local Single Sky ImPlementation Planning and Reporting Tool 42 Documents (one per each ECAC state + MUAC) Annual documents, based on ESSIP Plan = fact finding on real progress and plans For all national stakeholders LSSIP Documents: Azerbaijan is not a ECTL member State but participates as well in the LSSIP monitoring PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 9

10 OFFICIAL LSSIP Database Current users / use SJU USERS Nat. Reg. / NSAs Nat. Mil authorities ANSPs / Airports NM AUs PRB ICAO Eur. Reg. Office DG EUROCONTROL USE L3 of ATM Master Plan Specific planning actions and dedicated reporting CAPEX ICAO Eur. Regional Planning (ASBUs) Intelligence and Ad hoc actions UNOFFICIAL EASA/EC? Manufacturing Industry EUROCONTROL projects Ground material for EASA Inspections Gauge markets Confirm/challenge info available from the field Yearly satisfaction survey / Lessons learned to improve process, quality of info, data usability and accessibility, and cross-feeding with/to other sources 300 users of the Database PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 10

11 LSSIP Database Tools LSSIP Maps and Evolution charts & reports integrated in the European ATM Portal This Map Tool will be extended to cover all States of ICAO EUR region. For next ASBUs monitoring report maps will be presented depicting the individual progress. PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 11

12 activities are based on an annual cycle ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism Level 3 of the Master Plan = [ESSIP Plan + ESSIP Report] ESSIP Plan ESSIP Report LSSIP documents (41 States+ MUAC) PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 12

13 ESSIP Report Under the aegis of SESAR WPC.02 ECAC-wide implementation Progress Assessment Gives an integrated picture of ATM related activities Includes recommendations Report Based mainly on LSSIP Documents Some information included in the 2014 ASBU Monitoring Report was extracted from the ESSIP Report Different views on progress (Stakeholders view, FAB view) PEPR Implementation Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 13

14 In a nutshell Unique ATM Implementation & Monitoring process throughout entire ECAC Exists since 20 years Has been continuously adapting in the past, and will be in the future Is performed through contact between dedicated Contact Persons (Agency) and Focal Points (national stakeholders) Is by nature annual, with fixed milestones In line with ATM Master Plan, ICAO GANP, etc. Pragmatic, cost efficient, full-cycle EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 14

15 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 15

16 EANPG Conclusion 55/02 Regional planning for ASBU Implementation The ASBU Block 0 Modules prioritization table, as provided in App G to this report, is endorsed as the initial version of the EUR ASBU Implementation Plan; The mechanism for monitoring and reporting the implementation status of Priority 1 Modules, using the combined efforts of Eurocontrol ESSIP mechanism and the ICAO EUR questionnaire, as provided at App F to this report, should be used for collecting information for the reporting period ; Eurocontrol is invited to consider extending the scope of the ESSIP/LSSIP reporting tool(s) to the ICAO EUR States outside of the ECAC area; and The ASBU Block 0 Modules prioritization table be reviewed on an annual basis and be extended to cover Block 1 Modules, as appropriate. EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 16

17 EANPG decisions EANPG /55 agreed that a cooperative mechanism would be put in place between ICAO and EUROCONTROL. This mechanism would encompass the utilisation of the EUROCONTROL ESSIP/LSSIP process complemented by a specific ICAO EUR ASBU questionnaire. EANPG/55 - the ASBU Block 0 Modules prioritisation table, as provided in Appendix G to EANPG/55 report, was endorsed as the initial version of the EUR ASBU Implementation Plan, which presents a link between ICAO ASBU B0 Modules and ESSIP Objectives and establishes a basis for the reporting mechanisms of the EUR/NAT Region The mechanism for monitoring and reporting the implementation status of Priority 1 Modules, uses the combined efforts of EUROCONTROL ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism and the ICAO EUR questionnaire, in an effort to avoid duplication of reporting. EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 17

18 EUROCONTROL and ICAO/RO working together Reporting mechanism already existing in the European region, namely ESSIP/LSSIP, to be re-used in order to prepare a report for ICAO HQ on ASBU implementation. For ECAC States there was no double reporting issue - as all the information was extracted from ESSIP/LSSIP process. For non-ecac States reporting burden limited to minimum with specific guidance provided by EUROCONTROL. First report on ASBU implementation in ICAO EUR Region covering 41 ECAC and 4 non-ecac States, produced April 2015 A very good example of cooperation between two international organisations where mechanisms already existing in the European region were re-used to prepare a report for ICAO EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 18

19 Reviewed Mapping of ESSP Objectives and ASBUs Block 0 Priority 1 Modules 1 B0-ACAS ATC16 ACAS Improvements Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 B0-APTA NAV10 Optimization of Approach Procedures including Implement APV procedures vertical guidance B0-DATM INF04 Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management Implement integrated briefing ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration B0-SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets STCA Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets APW Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets MSAW B0-SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A- SMGCS Level 1-2) information ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated coordination processes ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) ATC02.2 (This objective is finalised in ECAC area) Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 19

20 Other Block 0 Modules Mapping ESSP Objectives and ASBUs B0-ACDM Improved Airport Operations through Airport- CDM B0-ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance B0-CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) B0-FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En-Route Trajectories B0-NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide view B0-RSEQ Improve Traffic flow through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) B0-TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial y ( ) AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability ENV-01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management NAV03 Improved Operations through Enhanced En-Route Trajectories FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 ESSIP Plan : EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 20

21 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 21

22 Structure of the report Chapter 2 provides a concise description about the ESSIP/LSSIP process and corresponding colour scheme for different progress. Chapter 3 presents an overview of current Block 0 implementation status of 42 ECAC States and 4 non-ecac states. Priority 1 modules Other modules Annex 1 includes detailed progress report of each Block 0 Module objective. Annex 2 presents the link between ICAO ASBU B0 module and ESSIP objectives EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 22

23 Contents The report shows the level of implementation per ASBU and highlights the areas with potential risk of delay (details and explanations provided in the Annex). Due to different level of reporting between ECAC and non-ecac States results are presented separately and also differentiation between Priority 1 and Other Block 0 modules. Report agreed with ICAO EUR/NAT Office and published on EUROCONTROL website: EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 23

24 Geographical scope Information provided Info not available EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 24

25 42 ECAC States Information extracted from ESSIP/LSSIP process Priority 1 Block 0 ASBUs EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 25

26 42 ECAC States Information extracted from ESSIP/LSSIP process Other Block 0 ASBUs EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 26

27 4 non-ecac States Priority 1 Block 0 ASBUs BEL:Belarus KAZ: Kazakhstan KGZ:Kyrgyzstan R: Russian Federation EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 27

28 2 non-ecac States Other Block 0 ASBUs EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 28

29 Next Steps Report presented at COG/62 (25-29 May) EANPG in Nov 2015 will be asked to endorse this Report. Need to involve more non-ecac States and strengthen monitoring. EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 29

30 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 30

31 Some Lessons learnt 1. Start small, then grow 2. Look for a coordination body / bodies 3. Give maximum guidance on process AND on content 4. Adapt to the specific circumstances of country / region / environment / circumstances EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 31

32 Some Lessons learnt 5. It is no shame if an issue is not planned to be implemented but it should be properly explained 6. However, plans always slip so take it into account 7. Focus on progress but also on plans to fill the gap 8. Be pragmatic EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 32

33 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 33

34 Changes on the template/questionnaire As a lesson learnt from previous cycle, the template was improved: How: Elimination of repeated titles Layout improved for more clarity Details of the required activities included EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 34

35 Changes in the template\questionnaire Each objective has associated some headlines related to the most relevant activities They are not exhaustive, meaning other activities may be required to fully complete the objective They also provide a kind of guidance on what should be reported in the short explanation of the free field EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 35

36 Agenda 1. Background of ESSIP/LSSIP 2. ESSIP/LSSIP serving ICAO EUR/NAT 3. Report Lessons learnt 5. Changes 6. Way Forward EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 36

37 Way Forward Information from non ECAC States will be collected using the questionnaire For ECAC States information from LSSIP database will be used Preparation of data for next cycle starts in November 2015 Reference date for the input - Dec 2015 You will be requested to fill in the questionnaire Give us 'high level' data for the 22 objectives indicated in the questionnaire. End of February LSSIP data base is frozen Next report available April 2016 EUROCONTROL ATMGE/21 ASBU Monitoring 37

38 More Questions? Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DPS/PEPR - EUROCONTROL