Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update

Transcription

1 Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update 1

2 FAA CDM Office CDM Domestic combined with International Operations, includes International Data Sharing One Manager Two Full Time Team Leads, Two Part-Time Two Staff Specialists One Executive Assistant NATCA CDM Representative 2

3 Global Collaboration ATCSCC/EuroControl; Action Plan 26 Collaborating with ICAO on a global ATFM manual; Chapter on CDM Working with various air navigation service providers (ANSP) to foster the concept of CDM International Telcons; Planning, Hurricane, Volcanic Ash, CDM Roadshows 3

4 CDM Working Group Structure Flow Evaluation Team (FET) FAA/NBAA Future Concept Team (FCT) FAA/DAL Weather Evaluation Team (WET) FAA/JBU Surface CDM Team (SCT) FAA/FDX CDM Training Team (CTT) FAA/AWE 4

5 Flow Evaluation Team Develop new Collaborative National Planning concepts (Automated) Future Applications of Required Time of Arrival/Control Time of Arrival 5

6 Weather Evaluation Team Developing and coordinating new weather forecasting products and procedures for Traffic Management 6

7 Future Concept Team Developing Phase I of Collaborative Airspace Constraint Resolution (CACR) 7

8 ICR - Integrated Collaborative Rerouting EARLY INTENT REQUIRED Future Concept Team LNK ORIGINAL IRW ABI 8

9 Select Best Route around FCA 9

10 NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes EWR1 EWR ROUTES EWR2 EWR3 EWR4 EWR5 EWR6 EWR7 EWR8 EWR9 10

11 NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes JFK1/TEB1 JFK/TEB ROUTES JFK2/TEB2 JFK3/TEB3 JFK4/TEB4 JFK5/TEB5 JFK6/TEB6 JFK7/TEB7 11

12 CTOP Concept SEVEN7 Collaborative Trajectory Options Program System Enhancements for Versatile Electronic Negotiation Prioritized Option List Constraint Definition User generates list of prioritized multiple options Automated messages Dynamic Flight list TFM-S manages data exchange TM monitors capacity and manages demand TBO - Trajectory Based Operations 12

13 CTOP CTOP SEVEN7 Concept System Collaborative Enhancements Trajectory for Versatile Options Electronic Program Negotiation Flow Constrained Area (FCA) Interactive Dynamic Flight List (IDFL) 13

14 TOS - Trajectory Options Set TOS for UAL mins ZKC_wx 60 mins Initial Filed trajectory RMNT: Route Minimum Notification Time required by the user to accept the given trajectory 14 RMNT = RMNT = 60 mins mins delay, RMNT = RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 15 mins mins delay, 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 15 mins mins delay, ZKC_wx mins delay, RMNT = 15 mins RMNT = 15 mins mins delay mins delay 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay Initial trajectory mins delay mins delay 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay RMNT : Route Minimum Notification Time required by the user to accept the given trajectory

15 CTOP Collaborative Trajectory Options Program Scheduled Filed Active Delayed Re-routed More flights get rerouted and delayed (shown in white & yellow) 15

16 CTOP Collaborative Trajectory Options Program EXIT STRATEGY Scheduled Filed Active Delayed Re-routed Flights begin returning to their #1 option or original route (white & yellow routes reducing and more green routes appear) Demand through the ZKC FCA after capacity dial up to 80% 16

17 CACR Collaborative Airspace Constraint Resolution 1. Right Sizing the Constraint - Decision support: Where to draw the line? Where to set the dial? 17

18 Decision support : Where to set the dial? Framework for Weather Impacts in Decision Support Weather CIWS / CoSPA Precipitation & Echo Tops Forecasts Pilot Model: Probability of Deviation Translation Forecast Weather Avoidance Field (WAF) Operational Needs Performance Metrics RAPT Route / flow blockage Capacity impacts FCA Capacity Forecast Matrix Airspace Impact Forecasts Decision Support 18

19 2. Tactical Departure Constraint Resolution & Tactical Enroute Constraint Resolution Tactical Reroutes Less Than 45 MIN From Departure Tactical Airborne Reroutes Terminal En Route Terminal 19

20 Surface CDM Team Developing Requirements Document for sharing airport surface data Collaborating with EuroControl Airport- CDM Team to harmonize (where possible) Surface CDM Procedures 20

21 Surface CDM Team (SCT) Update Summary of Major CONOPS Changes Alignment with NextGen Implementation Plan (NGIP) & FAA Response to RTCA Task Force Recommendations Alignment with industry CONOPS-writing standards Development of Departure Reservoir Management (DRM) and Departure Metering Procedures (DMP) concepts Time-Based DMP (assignment of TMAT) Count-Based DMP (assignment of TMAC) Marshall Mowery, FAA Surface CDM Mark Hopkins, Delta Airlines 21

22 Foundational Surface CDM Capabilities & Procedures 1. Improve Individual and Shared Situational Awareness to Manage Departures. 2. Tactically Manage Surface Movement and Departure Queues 3. Improve Situational Awareness to Manage Arrival Traffic Flows 4. Improve Analysis and Measurement of Surface Operations 5. Global Harmonization 22

23 Goals of Surface CDM Establish a foundation for interoperability/global harmonization with other relevant Airport CDM programs Identify policy considerations for each of the core capabilities Align with the FAA s NextGen Solution Sets Flexible, transparent, quantifiable Understand the real demand at an airport Improve situational awareness Disseminate timely and accurate airport surface operations information among Stakeholders in a standardized format 23

24 Goals of Surface CDM Archive and store data for post-operational retrieval and analysis by all Stakeholders Identify measures and metrics which allow Stakeholders to measure the efficiency of the airport surface operation Improve predictability by continuously monitoring capacity and demand Improve NAS efficiency Effectively improve timeliness of flight operations Reduce the environmental impact of airport surface operations 24

25 Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS Key Similarities Use of information sharing guidelines & similar milestones approaches. Shared milestones include, but not limited to: Target off Block Time (TOBT) Actual off Block Time (AOBT) Actual Take off Time (ATOT) Estimated Landing Time (ELDT) Target Landing Time (TLDT) Actual Landing Time (ALDT) Establishment of Key Performance Areas and Indicators Collaborative pre-departure sequencing and management of flight updates Incorporation of variable taxi times into prediction/planning 25

26 Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS Key Differences Surface CDM CONOPS establishes the metering point at the transition between the non-movement and movement areas (spots), whereas Airport CDM establishes the control point at the gate/stand. Surface CDM does not adopt Airport CDM s Target Startup Approval Time (TSAT) turn-around milestone. Operators will determine startup time internally as necessary to adhere to established spot arrival times. Surface CDM equitably assigns departure opportunities to aircraft operators in the form of specific Target Movement area Entry Times (TMATs) or Target Movement area Entry Counts (TMACs), depending on which capacity allocation method best suits the needs of a particular operation. Within Surface CDM, the entity responsible for acting as the Departure Reservoir Coordinator (DRC) will be selected on an airport-by-airport basis, and may not necessarily be ATC/TFM. Surface CDM recognizes the FAA definition of taxi time as time in movement area, but also considers out-to-off performance. Airport-CDM defines taxi time as out-to-off. 26

27 -Culture Change -Runway and Taxiway Closures -New and Challenging Configurations -Airspace Constraints, Conflict with LGA - 7 Terminals, Cargo and General Aviation Terminals -145 Carriers, International and Domestic -Existing Tools, funding, bureaucratic process 27

28 28

29 Support customers with effective surface management in response to construction Maintain similar throughput Mitigate increase in delays Increase Safety Provide a better passenger experience 29

30 Promote Culture Change Exit First Come First Served Ration by Schedule through Equitable Allocation of Bucket Times Communicate and leverage strategic support from FAA Maximize surface efficiency by allocating bucket times based on true departure capacity for the configuration, first fix availability Enable more seamless configuration changes by reducing AOA congestion 30

31 31

32 JFK Performance with Metering Source: ASPM 2010 taxi out times were approximately 4 minutes less than in

33 Gate Departure Delay Source: ASPM More gate delay in 2010 compared to

34 Questions? 34