Validation Report. Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd. VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Validation Report. Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd. VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project."

Transcription

1 Validation Report Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project REPORT NO , August 30 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon Management Service Westendstr Munich GERMANY

2 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 2 of 13 Report No. Date of first issue Revision No. Date of this revision Certificate No Subject: Validation of a CDM Project Accredited TÜV SÜD Unit: TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Certification Body climate and energy Westendstr Munich FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Client: Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co. Ltd No. 61 Huming Road Room 4A Xiamen Fujian Province P.R. CHINA Project Title: TÜV SÜD Contract Partner: Jiangsu TUV Product Service Ltd. Shanghai Branch 16F, West Building New Hua Lian Mansion No. 775 Huai Hai Road Shanghai P.R. CHINA Project Site(s): East of Liuao peninsula Liuao town Zhangpu County Fujian Province P.R. CHINA Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Applied Methodology / Version: ACM0002 / Version 06 Scope(s): 1 First Version: Date of issuance: Version No.: 1 Starting Date of Estimated Annual Emission Reduction: Assessment Team Leader: Dr. Sven Kolmetz version: Date of issuance: Version No.: 05 84,130 tons CO 2e Further Assessment Team Members: Cuiyun Zhang Summary of the Validation Opinion: The review of the project design documentation and the subsequent follow-up interviews have provided TÜV SÜD with sufficient evidence to determine the fulfilment of all stated criteria. In our opinion, the project meets all relevant UNFCCC requirements for the CDM. Hence TÜV SÜD will recommend the project for registration by the CDM Executive Board in case letters of approval of all Parties involved will be available before the expiring date of the applied methodology(ies) or the applied methodology version respectively. The review of the project design documentation and the subsequent follow-up interviews have not provided TÜV SÜD with sufficient evidence to determine the fulfilment of all stated criteria. Hence TÜV SÜD will not recommend the project for registration by the CDM Executive Board and will inform the project participants and the CDM Executive Board on this decision.

3 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 3 of 13 Abbreviations ACM AM AOR CAR CDM CER CR DNA DOE EB EIA / EA ER GHG HWC KP MP NGO PP TÜV SÜD UNFCCC VVM Approved Consolidated Methodology Approved Methodology Ammonia Oxidation Reactor Corrective Action Request Clean Development Mechanism Certified Emission Reduction Clarification Request Designated National Authority Designated Operational Entity Executive Board Environmental Impact Assessment / Environmental Assessment Emission reduction Greenhouse gas(es) Hanwha Corporation Kyoto Protocol Monitoring Plan Non Governmental Organisation Project Design Document Project Participant TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Validation and Verification Manual

4 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 4 of 13 Table of Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION Objective Scope 5 2 METHODOLOGY Appointment of the Assessment Team Review of Documents Follow-up Interviews Resolution of Clarification and Corrective Action Requests Internal Quality Control 10 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS COMMENTS BY PARTIES, STAKEHOLDERS AND NGOS VALIDATION OPINION...13 Annex 1: Validation Protocol Annex 2: Information Reference List

5 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 5 of 13 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objective The validation objective is an independent assessment by a Third Party (Designated Operational Entity = DOE) of a proposed project activity against all defined criteria set for the registration under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Validation is part of the CDM project cycle and will finally result in a conclusion by the executing DOE whether a project activity is valid and should be submitted for registration to the CDM-EB. The ultimate decision on the registration of a proposed project activity rests at the CDM Executive Board and the Parties involved. The project activity discussed by this validation report has been submitted under the project title: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project 1.2 Scope The scope of any assessment is defined by the underlying legislation, regulation and guidance given by relevant entities or authorities. In the case of CDM project activities the scope is set by: The Kyoto Protocol, in particular 12 Decision 2/CMP1 and Decision 3/CMP.1 (Marrakech Accords) Further COP/MOP decisions with reference to the CDM (e.g. decisions 4 8/CMP.1) Decisions by the EB published under Specific guidance by the EB published under Guidelines for Completing the Project Design Document (CDM-), and the Proposed New Baseline and Monitoring Methodlogy (CDM-NM) The applied approved methodology The technical environment of the project (technical scope) Internal and national standards on monitoring and QA/QC Technical guideline and information on best practice The validation is not meant to provide any consulting towards the client. However, stated requests for clarifications and/or corrective actions may provide input for improvement of the project design. Once TÜV SÜD receives a first version, it is made publicly available on the internet at TÜV SÜD s webpage as well as on the UNFCCC CDM-webpages for starting a 30 day global stakeholder consultation process (). In case of any request a might be revised (under certain conditions the will be repeated) and the final will form the basis for the final evaluation as presented by this report. Information on the first and on the final version is presented at page 1. The only purpose of a validation is its use during the registration process as part of the CDM project cycle. Hence, TÜV SÜD can not be held liable by any party for decisions made or not made based on the validation opinion, which will go beyond that purpose.

6 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 6 of 13 2 METHODOLOGY The project assessment aims at being a risk based approach and is based on the methodology developed in the Validation and Verification Manual (for further information see an initiative of Designated and Applicant Entities, which aims to harmonize the approach and quality of all such assessments. In order to ensure transparency, a validation protocol was customised for the project. TÜV SÜD developed a cook-book for methodology-specific checklists and protocol based on the templates presented by the Validation and Verification Manual. The protocol shows, in a transparent manner, criteria (requirements), the discussion of each criterion by the assessment team and the results from validating the identified criteria. The validation protocol serves the following purposes: It organises, details and clarifies the requirements a CDM project is expected to meet; It ensures a transparent validation process where the validator will document how a particular requirement has been validated and the result of the validation. The validation protocol consists of three tables. The different columns in these tables are described in the figure below. The completed validation protocol is enclosed in Annex 1 to this report. Validation Protocol Table 1: Conformity of Project Activity and Checklist Topic / Question Reference Comments in The checklist is organised in sections following the arrangement of the applied version. Each section is then further subdivided. The lowest level constitutes a checklist question / criterion. Gives reference to documents where the answer to the checklist question or item is found in case the comment refers to documents other than the. The section is used to elaborate and discuss the checklist question and/or the conformance to the question. It is further used to explain the conclusions reached. In some cases sub-checklist are applied indicating yes/no decisions on the compliance with the stated criterion. Any Request has to be substantiated within this column Conclusions are presented based on the assessment of the first version. This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (), or a Corrective Action Request (CAR) due to noncompliance with the checklist question (See below). Clarification Request (CR) is used when the validation team has identified a need for further clarification. Conclusions are presented in the same manner based on the assessment of the final version. As for this specific project the final was applying a different version of the methodology than the first one, a table 1a and a table 1b are presented reflecting the changes by the revision of the methodology.

7 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 7 of 13 Validation Protocol Table 2: Resolution of Corrective Action and Clarification Requests Clarifications and corrective action requests Ref. to table 1 Summary of project owner response Validation team conclusion If the conclusions from table 1 are either a Corrective Action Request or a Clarification Request, these should be listed in this section. Reference to the checklist question number in Table 1 where the Corrective Action Request or Clarification Request is explained. The responses given by the client or other project participants during the communications with the validation team should be summarised in this section. This section should summarise the validation team s responses and final conclusions. The conclusions should also be included in Table 1, under. In case of a denial of the project activity more detailed information on this decision will be presented in table 3. Validation Protocol Table 3: Unresolved Corrective Action and Clarification Requests Clarifications and corrective action requests If the final conclusions from table 2 results in a denial the referenced request should be listed in this section. Id. of CAR/CR 1 Identifier of the Request. Explanation of the Conclusion for Denial This section should present a detail explanation, why the project is finally considered not to be in compliance with a criterion.

8 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 8 of Appointment of the Assessment Team According to the technical scopes and experiences in the sectoral or national business environment TÜV SÜD has composed a project team in accordance with the appointment rules of the TÜV SÜD certification body climate and energy. The composition of an assessment team has to be approved by the Certification Body ensuring that the required skills are covered by the team. The Certification Body TÜV SÜD operates four qualification levels for team members that are assigned by formal appointment rules: Assessment Team Leader (ATL) Greenhouse Gas Auditor (GHG-A) Greenhouse Gas Auditor Trainee (T) Experts (E) It is required that the sectoral scope linked to the methodology has to be covered by the assessment team. The validation team was consisting of the following experts (the responsible Assessment Team Leader in written in bold letters): Name Qualification Coverage of technical scope Coverage of sectoral expertise Dr. Sven Kolmetz ATL Host country experience Cuiyun Zhang A Dr. Sven Kolmetz is physicist and deputy head at the department TÜV Carbon Management Service located in the head office of TÜV Süddeutschland in Munich. Furthermore he is officially authorized expert in the verification of GHG emissions in the framework of the European Emission Trading Scheme. Before entering TÜV SÜD he worked as energy consultant for industrial companies and as consultant for the German Federal Government on instruments for the reduction of GHG emissions. Cuiyun Zhang is an auditor for environmental management systems (according to ISO 14001) at Jiangsu TUV Product Service Ltd. She is based in Shanghai. In her position she is responsible for the implementation of validation, verification and certifications audits for management systems. She has received training in the CDM validation process and participated already in several CDM project assessments. 2.2 Review of Documents The first version submitted by the client and additional background documents related to the project design and baseline were reviewed as initial step of the validation process. A complete list of all documents and proofs reviewed is attached as annex 2 to this report.

9 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 9 of Follow-up Interviews On January 27, 2007 TÜV SÜD performed interviews on-site with project stakeholders to confirm selected information and to resolve issues identified in the first document review. The table below provides a list of all persons interviewed in the context of this on-site visit. Name Mr. Zheng Xipeng Ms. Xia Xiaoshu Mr. Zhai Wenfeng Mr. Rui Shaoqi Organisation Water Resources & Electric Power Materials & Equipment Co., Ltd. (Project manager) China National Water Resources & Electric Power Materials & Equipment Co., Ltd. (Project manager) Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd. (Project manager) Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd. (Project manager)

10 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 10 of Resolution of Clarification and Corrective Action Requests The objective of this phase of the validation is to resolve the requests for corrective actions and clarifications and any other outstanding issues which needed to be clarified for TÜV SÜD`s positive conclusion on the project design. The Corrective Action Requests and Clarification Requests raised by TÜV SÜD were resolved during communication between the client and TÜV SÜD. To guarantee the transparency of the validation process, the concerns raised and responses that have been given are summarised in chapter 3 below and documented in more detail in the validation protocol in annex Internal Quality Control As final step of a validation the validation report and the protocol have to undergo and internal quality control procedure by the Certification Body climate and energy, i.e. each report has to be approved either by the head of the certification body or his deputy. In case one of these two persons is part of the assessment team approval can only be given by the other one. It rests at the decision of TÜV SÜD s Certification Body whether a project will be submitted for requesting registration by the EB or not.

11 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 11 of 13 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The following description of the project as per could be verified during the on-site audit: The proposed Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45 MW Wind Power Project involves the installation of 36 turbines, each of which has a rated output of 1250 kw, providing a total capacity of 45 MW. The annual output of this project is estimated to be 95,602 MWh. The electricity to be generated will be sold to the East China Grid through Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). As informed above all finding are summarized in table 2 of the attached validation protocol. In total the assessment team expressed 6 Clarification Requests and 7 Corrective Action Requests. The required evidences regarding realization of training courses and barriers which would occur while establishing a hydro power plant have been brought forward and submitted to the DOE and auditor respectively [CR3, CR5] The more formal information about - the spezification of the geographical coordinates, - the time schedule of the project implementation - etc. has been included in the [CR2, CR4] as well as the technical requirements to demanstrate the accuracy of main and back-up meters and the measurement of consumed electricity [CR6]. All the information, parameter, data sources and applied formulae finally are necessary to calculate the emission reductions such as - the determination of the crediting period [CAR1], - the calculation of the yearly emission reductions (ERy) [CAR2] - the calculation on figuring out the IRR and NPV [CAR3] - the yearly operation time in terms of assessing and demonstrating additionality [CAR3] - the lowcost/must run resources concerning the justification of the methodological [CAR4] - etc. have been revised, completed, added or included in the. For the BM calculation the adopts modified methods agreed by the EB for the approved methodologies AM0005 and AMS I.D. because plant specific data are not available in China. The emission factor of the thermal power plants is calculated by the proportion of the emissions of coal, gas and oil times the emission factor of the best available coal, gas and oil power plant as defined and published by the Chinese DNA. The new thermal capacity installation that exceeds 20% in the last years, for which data are available, is finally assessed with this factor. The additionality has been evidenced by investment analysis. The benchmark used (IRR) and the IRR calculation will be uploaded together with the. The investment costs are approved by the regional authorities. The related parts of the feasibility study will be uploaded in a translated version. The stakeholder process has taken place before the starting date of the project activity (construction). This shows CDM has been considered in the beginning. Moreover, the supporting letters from NGO for the GOLD Standard process are dated before the starting date as well. Hence, the project complies with the requirements.

12 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 12 of 13 4 COMMENTS BY PARTIES, STAKEHOLDERS AND NGOS TÜV SÜD published the project documents on UNFCCC website by installing a link to TÜV SÜD s own website and invited comments by Parties, stakeholders and non-governmental organisations during a period of 30 days. The following table presents all key information on this process: webpage: Starting date of the global stakeholder consultation process: Comment submitted by: Issues raised: none - Response by TÜV SÜD: -

13 Validation of the CDM Project: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Page 13 of 13 5 VALIDATION OPINION TÜV SÜD has performed a validation of the following proposed CDM project activity: Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project The review of the project design documentation and the subsequent follow-up interviews have provided TÜV SÜD with sufficient evidence to determine the fulfilment of stated criteria. In our opinion, the project meets all relevant UNFCCC requirements for the CDM. Hence TÜV SÜD will recommend the project for registration by the CDM Executive Board. An analysis as provided by the applied methodology demonstrates that the proposed project activity is not a likely baseline scenario. Emission reductions attributable to the project are hence additional to any that would occur in the absence of the project activity. Given that the project is implemented as designed, the project is likely to achieve the estimated amount of emission reductions as specified within the final version. The validation is based on the information made available to us and the engagement conditions detailed in this report. The validation has been performed using a risk based approach as described above. The only purpose of this report is its use during the registration process as part of the CDM project cycle. Hence, TÜV SÜD can not be held liable by any party for decisions made or not made based on the validation opinion, which will go beyond that purpose. Munich, Munich, Certification Body climate and energy TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Assessment Team Leader

14 Annex 1: Validation Protocol

15 Table 1 Conformity of Project Activity and A. General description of project activity A.1. Title of the project activity A.1.1. A.1.2. A.1.3. Does the used project title clearly enable to identify the unique CDM activity? Are there any indication concerning the revision number and the date of the revision? Is this consistent with the time line of the project s history? A.2. Description of the project activity A.2.1. A.2.2. Is the description delivering a transparent overview of the project activities? What proofs are available demonstrating that the project description is in compliance with the actual situation or planning? 1 The project is titled with the name of the project location, the power capacity and the energy source of the project. Hence, it can be clearly identified. 1 The available for document review and on site assessment is indicated as the 1st version and completed on January 5 th, The same version has been published for since Jan. 23 rd, , 6, 7, 9, 20, 21 1, 6, 7, 9, 20, 21 This wind farm schedules to install 36 turbines each of 1250 kw in Liuao town, Zhangpu County, Fujian Province. The power produced will be fed into the East China Grid. During the on site audit, the project activities described in the have been proven. Clarification Request 1: Introduced by the project owner during the interview, Suzlon Energy is selected to be the turbine supplier. Please add the manufacturer name and turbine type into the revised. The following data deliver evidences for the project activity: - Purchasing contract of turbines; - Feasibility Study Report (approved by Fujian Development and Reform Commission on Dec. 31 st, 2006) - Environmental Impact Assessment (approved by the EPB in CR 1 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-1

16 A.2.3. A.2.4. Is the information provided by these proofs consistent with the information provided by the? Is all information presented consistent with details provided by further chapters of the? 1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 16, 17 20, 21 of Fujian Province on Nov. 16 th, 2005) The required data are delivered in the and have been evidenced during the audit. The statistical background has been reviewed with official documentation (China Electric Power Yearbooks , China Energy Statistical Yearbooks and IPCC 2006 version). in 1, all information is presented consistent with the. A.3. Project participants A.3.1. A.3.2. A.3.3. Is the form required for the indication of project participants correctly applied? Is the participation of the listed entities or Parties confirmed by each one of them? Is all information on participants / Parties provided in consistency with details provided by further chapters of the (in particular annex 1)? 1. The required form is applied correctly. 1 Open issue: Until the on site audit, whether the investment party will be involved in this project has not been decided. It must be determined before submission for registration. Open issue 1 Pls. see A.3.2. Open issue A.4. Technical description of the project activity A.4.1. Location of the project activity A Does the information provided on the location of the project activity allow for a 1 Clarification Request 2: Pls. add the exact geographical coordinates into section A of CR 2 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-2

17 A A.4.2. A A.4.3. A A A A clear identification of the site(s)? How is it ensured and/or demonstrated, that the project proponents can implement the project at this site (ownership, licenses, contracts etc.)? Category(ies) of project activity To which category(ies) does the project activity belonging to? Is the category correctly identified and indicated? 1, 9, 10, 12, 21 Technology to be employed by the project activity Does the technical design of the project activity reflect current good practices? Does the description of the technology to be applied provide sufficient and transparent input / information to evaluate its impact on the greenhouse gas balance? Does the implementation of the project activity require any technology transfer from annex-i-countries to the host country(ies)? Is the technology implemented by the project activity environmentally safe? the. The project owner is Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd., a subsidiary company of Datang Group which is one of the biggest 5 power companies in China. As mentioned in this protocol above, the approvals of the feasibility report and EIA of the proposed project are issued in Dec., 2006 and Nov., 2006 by the Chinese authorized offices respectively. Moreover, the purchasing contract of the turbines has been countersigned with Suzlon Energy and the construction has started. The risk of not implementing this project at the defined site deems to be zero. 1, 2 The project activity assigns to scope 1, which has been clearly identified in the. 1, 9 Suzlon Energy, one of the biggest turbine manufactures, is chosen to be the supplier of this project. 1, 9 Referring to CR 1, the description of the applied technology needs to be added into the revised. However, because the project activity comprises the use of wind power for the substitution of grid supplied electricity mainly from coal fired plants. There is no doubt that this technology will reduce GHG emissions significantly. 1, 9. Though totally 36 turbines are assembled in China, the Denmark Design Center is responsible for the design, the function and the key components which are imported. 1, 9 As a wind farm project, there s no doubt that this project is environmentally safe. in See CR 1 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-3

18 A A A Is the information provided in compliance with the actual situation or planning? Does the project use state of the art technology and / or does the technology result in a significantly better performance than any commonly used technologies in the host country? Is the project technology likely to be substituted by other or more efficient technologies within the project period? 1, 9, the information is in compliance with the actual situation or planning. 1, 9 The project owner purchases and installs 1,250 kw turbines from well-known international wind plant manufacturers. As introduced by the project owner, comparing to the domestic technology, it s more mature and advanced. 1, 9 We do not expect that there will be a substitution, because the turbines and the other equipment will be newly commissioned and installed. The life cycle of a wind turbine is under normal circumstances longer than the project period. in A Does the project require extensive initial training and maintenance efforts in order to be carried out as scheduled during the project period? 1, 9 Allowing for the advanced technology is implemented in this project, extensive initial training is needed to guarantee safe operation during the life time. According to the purchasing contract, Suzlon Energy is responsible for providing operation and maintenance training. Clarification Request 3: Introduced by the project owner, the relative training courses have been executed. Pls. deliver the evidence, such as, training material, training agenda, participant list, etc., to the DOE. CR 3 A Is information available on the demand and requirements for training and maintenance? A Is a schedule available for the implementation of the project and are there any risks for delays? 1, 9 Pls. see A of the protocol. See CR 3 1, 9 The planning schedule in the past and for the future was clearly described by Mr. Zhai, the project manager during the interview. Considering the fact that the construction has been kicked off and the supplier of turbines guarantees the on-time-delivery of all turbines, the risks for delays is low. Clarification Request 4: CR 4 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-4

19 A.4.4. A A A.4.5. A A Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period Is the form required for the indication of projected emission reductions correctly applied? Are the figures provided consistent with other data presented in the? Public funding of the project activity Is the information provided on public funding provided in compliance with the actual situation or planning as available by the project participants? Is all information provided consistent with the details given in remaining chapters of the (in particular annex 2)? B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology The time schedule of the implementation of the project should be included into the. 1, 2 Corrective Action Request 1: The required form is applied in the. However, the defined first crediting period is wrong. It shall be 2007 (the second half of the year) 2014 (the first half of the year). Please correct. 1, 2 Corrective Action Request 2: Referring to the emission factor of the defined grid (0.88) from Annex 3 which has been verified on site, the yearly emission reductions shall be 84,176 tco 2e. Pls. correct. B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology in CAR 1 CAR 2 1, 11 There s no public funding from Annex I parties. Project owner s capital and commercial loan from the Chinese bank compose the investment of this project. The release letter from the bank has been reviewed during the audit. 1, all information is in consistence with the. B.1.1. Are reference number, version number, and title of the baseline and monitoring methodology clearly indicated? 1, 2 The ACM0002 methodology under version 06 issued on May 19 th, 2006 is applied to this project. It is clearly indicated at B.1. of the. Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-5

20 B.1.2. Is the applied version the most recent one and / or is this version still applicable? in 1, 2 The 6 th version of ACM002 is the latest one. B.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project activity B.2.1. Is the applied methodology considered the most appropriate one? 1, 2 The project activity fulfills the criteria of ACM002: - utilization of wind sources; - not involves switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy at project site; - the geographic and system boundaries of the East China Grid can be clearly identified and the information of this grid is available. Thus, the baseline methodology is deemed to be the most applicable for this project among the existing approved baseline methodologies. Fill in the required amount of sub checklists for applicability criteria as given by the methodology applied and comment at least every line answered with No B.2.2. Criterion 1: Type of capacity addition by renewable energy 1, 2 Applicability checklist Criterion discussed in the? Compliance provable? Evidences provided in the? Compliance verified? / No B.2.3. Criterion 2: Exclusion of fuel switching activities 1, 2 Applicability checklist Criterion discussed in the? Compliance provable? / No Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-6

21 Evidences provided in the? Compliance verified? in B.2.4. Criterion 3: Defined electricity grid boundaries 1, 2 Applicability checklist Criterion discussed in the? Compliance provable? Evidences provided in the? Compliance verified? / No B.2.5. Criterion 4: Approved inclusion in other methodologies (if applied only) 1, 2 Among the methodologies, ACM0002 is the only one applied to this project activity. Thus, this section is not applicable. B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary B.3.1. Source: Fugitive Emissions from non-condensable gases (geothermal activities only) Gas(es): CO 2, CH 4 Type: Project Emissions 1, 2 Boundary checklist Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? Consistency with monitoring plan? / No B.3.2. Source: Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels (geothermal activities only) Gas(es): CO 2 Type: Project Emissions 1, 2 As a wind farm project, this section needs not be considered. Boundary checklist / No Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? Consistency with monitoring plan? Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-7

22 in B.3.3. Source: Emissions from the reservoir (new hydroelectric activities only) Gas(es): CO 2, CH 4 Type: Project Emissions 1, 2 As a wind farm project, this section needs not be considered. Boundary checklist / No Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? Consistency with monitoring plan? B.3.4. Source: Emissions from electricity generation in fossil fuel fired power plants of the project electricity system Gas(es): CO 2 Type: Baseline Emissions 1, 2 As a wind farm project, this section needs not be considered. Boundary checklist / No Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? Consistency with monitoring plan? B.3.5. Source: Emissions from electricity generation in fossil fuel fired power plants of any connected electricity system Gas(es): CO 2 Type: Baseline Emissions 1, 2 Boundary checklist Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? Consistency with monitoring plan? / No B.3.6. Source: Emissions from electricity generation in fossil fuel fired power plants of imported electricity 1, 2 Boundary checklist Source and gas(es) discussed by the? Inclusion / exclusion justified? Explanation / Justification sufficient? / No Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-8

23 Type: Baseline Emissions Consistency with monitoring plan? in Referring to Annex 3, the CO2 emissions from imported electricity has been considered while calculating the EF. However, because the ex-ante approach is chosen for this project, the monitoring of this source is not applicable. 1, 2 Referring to the delineation of the grid boundaries as provided by NDRC (China NDA), the connected electricity system is defined as the East China Grid, which is also verified by the auditor on site. B.3.7. Do the spatial and technological boundaries as verified on site comply with the discussion provided by the? B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified baseline scenario B.4.1. Is it clearly described that the baseline is represented by the combined margin of the grid the activity will be connected to? 1, 2 It s clearly stated in the that the baseline that electricity delivered to the grid by the proposed project would have otherwise been generated by fossil-fuel-fired plants which are connected to the East China Grid. B.4.2. In case of any modification or retrofit of existing facilities: Is data available to determine the historic production level? In case of any modification or retrofit of existing facilities: Have conservative assumptions been applied in order to estimate the point in time when the existing equipment needs to be replaced? 1, 2 There s no modification of an existing facility, so this section is not applicable. B , 2 There s no modification of an existing facility, so this section is not applicable. Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-9

24 in B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment and demonstration of additionality): B.5.1. B.5.2. B.5.3. Is evidence provided, that the project s starting date is after Jan 01, 2000 and before Nov 18, 2004? Is evidence provided, that CDM has been considered seriously in the decision to proceed with the project activity? Have realistic and credible alternatives been identified providing comparable outputs or services? (step 1a) 1, 2, 18 1, 2, 18 1, 2, 18 The crediting period of the proposed project will start at the second half of the year 2007, therefore, this section is not applicable., the supporting letters from NGO s as well as the stakeholder process has taken place before the starting date of construction. The following baseline scenarios are discussed: - Business as usual (grid electricity supply from the East China Grid) - Installation of a coal-fired power plant with similar capacity - Installation of another renewable power plant with similar capacity - The project itself without consideration of the CDM These scenarios are the only ones that are making sense. B.5.4. Is the project activity without CDM included in these alternatives? (step 1a) 1, 2, 18, the activity without CDM is considered as an alternative scenario. B.5.5. Is a discussion provided for all identified alternatives concerning the compliance with applicable laws and regulations? (step 1b) 1, 2, 18 The relative regulations and laws are clearly discussed for each scenario one by one in the. According to the Chinese power regulations, the construction of a coal-fired power plant of less than 135 MW are prohibited in the areas covered by large grids. The alternative of installation of a coal-fired power plant with similar capacity is not a realistic and credible alternative. B.5.6. In case the argues that specific laws are not enforced in the country or region: 1, 2, 18 All the laws quoted in the are all enforced at this project, hence, this section is not applicable. Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-10

25 B.5.7. Is evidence available concerning that statement? (step 1b) In case of applying step 2 / investment analysis of the additionality tool: Is the analysis method identified appropriately (step 2a)? 1, 2, 18 3 analysis methods are provided according to the additionality tool (version 2). Because the proposed project generates economic benefits through the sales of electricity other than CDM revenue. Therefore, the Option I (simple cost analysis) can t be taken. Moreover, the Option II (investment comparison analysis) only applies to projects where an alternative should be similar to finance projects. However, in this case, the baseline scenario is the East China Grid, hence, Option II can t be adopted either. It deems that Option III (benchmark analysis) is the only applicable one. in B.5.8. B.5.9. B In case of Option I (simple cost analysis): Is it demonstrated that the activity produces no economic benefits other than CDM income? In case of Option II (investment comparison analysis): Is the most suitable financial indicator clearly identified (IRR, NPV, cost benefit ratio, or (levelized) unit cost)? In case of Option III (benchmark analysis): Is the most suitable financial indicator clearly identified (IRR, NPV, cost benefit ratio, or (levelized) unit cost)? 1, 2, 18 1, 2, 18 1, 2, 18 As described above, Option III is chosen for the investment analysis. This section is not applicable. As described above, Option III is chosen for the investment analysis. This section is not applicable. The IRR and NPV with / without CDM revenue are clearly demonstrated in Table B-2 of the. The spreadsheet has been reviewed by the audit team. All the relative data for calculation are from the approved feasibility report. Corrective Action Request 3: - Required by the latest EB meeting, the data and calculation process on figuring out the IRR and NPV shall be added into the or attached to the as an annex; - Pls. also consider the yearly operation time as another CAR 3 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-11

26 sensitive parameter. - The additionality tool version 3 is the latest version. in B In case of Option II or Option III: Is the calculation of financial figures for this indicator correctly done for all alternatives and the project activity? 1, 2, 18 Referring to CAR 3, the spreadsheet needs to be published. However, the audit team has verified the calculation process together with the quoted data under the scenario of the project activity without a CDM revenue and the project itself. B B In case of Option II or Option III: Is the analysis presented in a transparent manner including publicly available proofs for the utilized data? In case of applying step 3 (barrier analysis) of the additionality tool: Is a complete list of barriers developed that prevent the different alternatives to occur? 1, 2, 18 1, 2, 18 All the utilized data are from the approved feasibility study report and have been clearly presented in the spreadsheet. It is expected that implementing the project would face investment and technical barriers. Clarification Request 5: As stated in the, the alternative of installing another renewable power plant with similar capacity could not be realized, because of the defined barriers. Please clearly present what kind of barriers would occur while establishing a hydro power plant and the relative evidence should be delivered to the auditor. CR 5 B In case of applying step 3 (barrier analysis): Is transparent and documented evidence provided on the existence and significance of these barriers? 1, 2, 19 Doubtless, while implementing the project activity, the project owner will encounter both financing and technology barriers. Compared with installing a coal-fire power plant, the low operation time and the high risk of operation weaken the loan repayment capability. On the other hand, more operation and maintenance problems are foreseen. These difficulties have been assessed by the audit team with evidences provided by bank and turbine manufacture. B In case of applying step 3 (barrier analysis): Is it transparently shown that the execution of at least one of the alterna- 1, the baseline scenario will not be prevented by either investment or technology barriers. Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-12

27 tives is not prevented by the identified barriers? B Have other activities in the host country / region similar to the project activity been identified and are these activities appropriately analyzed by the (step 4a)? B B If similar activities are occurring: Is it demonstrated that in spite of these similarities the project activity would not be implemented without the CDM component (step 4b)? Is it appropriately explained how the approval of the project activity will help to overcome the economic and financial hurdles or other identified barriers? B.6. Emissions reductions 1 All the similar wind power plants within Fujian Province are completely listed in Table B-5 of the. Additional to the source provided at 6 th footnote, the related information has also been confirmed while interviewing with the project owner. 1 Unlike the first 2 projects, which had been in operation before the Chinese power reform in 2002, listed in Table B-5, the proposed project activity could not obtain a high feed-in tariff. Therefore, the financial attractiveness is much lower and could not reach the power plant benchmark IRR. Another similar project is Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 30.6 MW Wind Power Plant, which was successfully registered to the CDM project and has been supported by CER sales profit. As stated by the project owner, the project activity would not be implemented without a CDM revenue. 1 The CDM registration will help to overcome the financial risks and technical barriers. in B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices B B Is it explained how the procedures provided in the methodology are applied by the proposed project activity? Is every selection of options offered by the methodology correctly justified and is this justification in line with the situation verified on site? 1, 14 The ex-ante approach is chosen for the baseline emission calculation. 1, 14, the justification has been fully discussed and demonstrated in the based on the options provided from the latest methodology. Besides one issue mentioned below, all the data are referring to the latest available Chinese Electric Power Yearbook CAR 4 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-13

28 B B B B Are the formulae required for the determination of project emissions correctly presented, enabling a complete identification of parameter to be used and / or monitored? Are the formulae required for the determination of baseline emissions correctly presented, enabling a complete identification of parameter to be used and / or monitored? Is the choice of options to determine the emissions factor (OM, BM) justified in a suitable and transparent manner? In case of alternative weighing factors for the Combined Margin: Is the quantification of the alternative weighing factor justified in a suitable and transparent manner? ( ), the China Energy Statistical Yearbook ( ) and IPCC version 2006). Corrective Action Request 4: If the simple OM method (a) is chosen, it s not sufficient only present the data of the Year 2004, pls. present the low-cost/must run resources constituted less than 50% of the total grid generation in an average of the 5 most recent years. 1 According to the methodology, the project participants need not consider project emissions. 1 All the formulae used are in compliance with the ones in the defined methodology, version 06. 1, 14 The justification is demonstrated in the. Referring to the data from the China Electric Yearbook, the Simple OM deems to be the only approach for OM calculation. Whereas, refer to the CAR 4, an additional description shall be added into the revised. On the other hand, the approved deviation is implemented for the BM estimation. All the relative evidences are verified by the auditor on site. 1, 14 The default weights for the wind farm project (W OM =0.75; W BM =0.25) defined in the methodology (06 ver.) are used. in See CAR 4 B In case of alternative weighing factors for 1, 14 See B of the protocol. Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-14

29 B B the Combined Margin: Is the guidance for the concerning the acceptability of alternative weights considered in the discussion? Are the formulae required for the determination of leakage emissions correctly presented, enabling a complete identification of parameter to be used and / or monitored? Are formulae required for the determination of emission reductions correctly presented? B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation B B Is the list of parameters presented in chapter B.6.2 considered to be complete with regard to the requirements of the applied methodology? Is the choice of ex-ante or ex-post vintage of OM and BM factors clearly specified in the? 1, 14 According to the methodology, consideration of leakage is not required. 1, 2. The formulae in the are clearly presented for the determination of the emission reductions. As the project emission and leakage are both zero, the emission reductions are equal to the baseline emissions. 1 Most of the parameters to determine the CM are indicated in Table B However, some indicators are missing. Corrective Action Request 5: Please refer to B B of the protocol, the mentioned indicators shall be included into the table, though the data and related sources have been assessed on site. 1 The ex-ante approach is chosen, which is clearly stated in B.6.3 of the. Fill in the required amount of sub checklists for monitoring parameter and comment any line answered with No B Parameter Title: Annual electricity supplied to the grid prior to retrofit (applicable only for retrofit and modifica- 1 Data Checklist Title in line with methodology? Data unit correctly expressed? / No in CAR 5 Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-15

30 tion activities) Appropriate description of parameter? Source clearly referenced? Correct value provided? Has this value been verified? Choice of data correctly justified? Measurement method correctly described? in B Parameter Title: Emission factor of the grid (CM) The project activity is a newly installation of a wind power plant, hence this parameter is not applicable. 1, 14 Data Checklist / No Title in line with methodology? Data unit correctly expressed? Appropriate description of parameter? Source clearly referenced? Correct value provided? Has this value been verified? Choice of data correctly justified? Measurement method correctly described? B Parameter Title: Operating margin (OM) emission factor of the grid The calculation process and quoted data are verified by the audit team on site. 1, 14 Data Checklist / No Title in line with methodology? Data unit correctly expressed? Appropriate description? Source clearly referenced? Correct value provided? Has this value been verified? Choice of data correctly justified? Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-16

31 Measurement method correctly described? in B Parameter Title: Build margin (BM) emission factor of the grid The calculation process and quoted data are verified by the audit team on site. 1, 14 Data Checklist / No Title in line with methodology? Data unit correctly expressed? Appropriate description of parameter? Source clearly referenced? Correct value provided? Has this value been verified? Choice of data correctly justified? Measurement method correctly described? B Parameter Title: fuel consumption of each power source The calculation process and quoted data are verified by the audit team on site. 1, 14 Data Checklist / No Title in line with methodology? Data unit correctly expressed? Appropriate description of parameter? Source clearly referenced? Correct value provided? Has this value been verified? Choice of data correctly justified? Measurement method correctly described? B Parameter Title: emission coefficient of each fuel 1, 14 Data Checklist / No Table 1 is applicable to ACM0002, version 06 with ex-ante determination of CM Page A-17

Carbon Resource Management Ltd. IN CHINA. 2008, October May 0624

Carbon Resource Management Ltd. IN CHINA. 2008, October May 0624 Validation Report Carbon Resource Management Ltd. VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: ZHEJIANG CIXI WIND FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO. 1055098 2008, October May 0624 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon

More information

Validation Report VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: SHABA 30MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT IN GUIZ- HOU PROVINCE CHINA REPORT NO

Validation Report VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: SHABA 30MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT IN GUIZ- HOU PROVINCE CHINA REPORT NO Validation Report 1000842 VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: SHABA 30MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT IN GUIZ- HOU PROVINCE CHINA REPORT NO. 1000842 2008, April 21 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon Management Service

More information

Validation Report. Gansu Jieyuan Wind Power Co., Ltd. 2008, August 12

Validation Report. Gansu Jieyuan Wind Power Co., Ltd. 2008, August 12 Validation Report Gansu Jieyuan Wind Power Co., Ltd VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: GANSU YUMEN SANSHILIJINGZI WIND POWER PROJECT REPORT NO. 1159769 2008, August 12 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon

More information

Validation Report. Xinjiang Tianfu Thermoelectric Co., Ltd

Validation Report. Xinjiang Tianfu Thermoelectric Co., Ltd Validation Report Xinjiang Tianfu Thermoelectric Co., Ltd VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: Manasi River Stage I Hydropower Project of Hongshanzui Hydropower Plant, Xinjiang Tianfu Thermoelectric REPORT NO.

More information

Validation Report. Abonos Colombianos SA.

Validation Report. Abonos Colombianos SA. Validation Report Abonos Colombianos SA. VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: PROJECT FOR THE CATALYTIC REDUCTION OF N 2 O EMISSIONS WITH A SECONDARY CATALYST INSIDE THE AMMONIA OXIDATION REACTORS OF THE NAN1

More information

Gold Standard Validation Report

Gold Standard Validation Report Gold Standard Validation Report CARBON ASSET MANAGEMENT SWEDEN AB Gold Standard Validation of the Ningxia Yinyi 49.50 MW Wind-farm Project, China Report No. 1053561 04 April 2008 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service

More information

Validation Report. Biogas de Juarez S.A de C.V. Ciudad Juarez Landfill Gas to Energy Project. 2007, August 20

Validation Report. Biogas de Juarez S.A de C.V. Ciudad Juarez Landfill Gas to Energy Project. 2007, August 20 Validation Report Biogas de Juarez S.A de C.V Ciudad Juarez Landfill Gas to Energy Project. REPORT NO. 978560 2007, August 20 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon Management Service Westendstr. 199-80686

More information

Validation Report. Beijing Guotou Energy Conservation Company. Validation of The 30 MW Tuoli Wind Farm Project in Urumqi, Xinjiang of China

Validation Report. Beijing Guotou Energy Conservation Company. Validation of The 30 MW Tuoli Wind Farm Project in Urumqi, Xinjiang of China Validation Report Beijing Guotou Energy Conservation Company Validation of The 30 MW Tuoli Wind Farm Project in Urumqi, Xinjiang of China Report No. 712740 rev. 1 17 July 2006 TÜV SÜD ndustrie Service

More information

Registration - Information and reporting checklist (Version 2.0) The main changes between version 1.0 and version 2.0 are the following:

Registration - Information and reporting checklist (Version 2.0) The main changes between version 1.0 and version 2.0 are the following: Registration - Information and reporting checklist (Version 2.0) Version 1.0 of the information and reporting checklist was published in June 2010. The enclosed version 2.0 of this checklist represents

More information

Validation Report. Kalpataru Energy Venture Pvt. Ltd. Validation of the Biomass Power Project at Kalpataru Energy Venture Private Limited

Validation Report. Kalpataru Energy Venture Pvt. Ltd. Validation of the Biomass Power Project at Kalpataru Energy Venture Private Limited Validation Report Kalpataru Energy Venture Pvt. Ltd. Validation of the Biomass Power Project at Kalpataru Energy Venture Private Limited Report No. 806970, Revision 01 2006, April 12 TÜV ndustrie Service

More information

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project SGS Climate Change Programme SGS United Kingdom Ltd SGS House 217-221 London Road

More information

Validation Report. Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL)

Validation Report. Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL) Validation Report Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL) Validation of the 4.5 MW Biomass (Agricultural Residues) Based Power Generation Unit of M/s Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL) project Report No. 6589 Revision

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report Determination of the Pilot programmatic Joint Implementation project in North Rhine- Westphalia (JIM.NRW) JI Program of Activities in Germany (Track 1) Report No. 987901 2007-11-14

More information

VALIDATION REPORT SAIHANBA EAST MW WINDFARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS

VALIDATION REPORT SAIHANBA EAST MW WINDFARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS VALIDATION REPORT SAIHANBA EAST 45.05 MW WINDFARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO. 2006-1309 REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS DET NORSKE VERITAS VALIDATION REPORT Date of first issue: Project No.: 2006-05-26

More information

Annex 3 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL. (Version 01) CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION

Annex 3 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL. (Version 01) CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL (Version 01) CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ABBREVIATIONS... 4 I. INTRODUCTION... 1 5 5 A. Updates to the Manual... 6 4 II. TERMS FOR VALIDATING

More information

Validation Report. The World Bank WEST GUANGXI. Report No March 2010

Validation Report. The World Bank WEST GUANGXI. Report No March 2010 Validation Report The World Bank VALIDATION OF THE CDM-PROJECT: REFORESTATION ON DEGRADED LANDS IN NORTH- WEST GUANGXI Report No. 845821 17 March 2010 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Carbon Management Service

More information

VALIDATION REPORT NINGXIA TIANJING MW WIND-FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS

VALIDATION REPORT NINGXIA TIANJING MW WIND-FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS VALIDATION REPORT NINGXIA TIANJING 50.25 MW WIND-FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO. 2006-1769 REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS VALIDATION REPORT Date of first issue: Project No.: 2006-10-23 45010012-9

More information

Annex 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL. (Version 01.2) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS... 3 I. INTRODUCTION...

Annex 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL. (Version 01.2) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS... 3 I. INTRODUCTION... Page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION MANUAL (Version 01.2) CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ABBREVIATIONS... 3 I. INTRODUCTION... 1 5 4 A. Updates to the Manual... 6 4 II. TERMS FOR VALIDATING

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report CJSC Severodonetsk Azot Association DETERMINATION OF THE JI TRACK-1 PROJECT: THE ABATEMENT OF N2O EMISSIONS FROM NITRIC ACID PRODUCTION AT CJSC SEVERODONETSK AZOT ASSOCIATION (UKRAINE)

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report LANXESS Deutschland GmbH DETERMINATION OF Redundant thermal decomposition of residual nitrous oxide (N2O) from the LANXESS adipic acid production in Krefeld-Uerdingen JI-Track 1 project

More information

Validation of CDM Projects Real life examples of what a DOE looks for

Validation of CDM Projects Real life examples of what a DOE looks for Validation of CDM Projects Real life examples of what a DOE looks for Jonathan Avis, CDM Business Manager ERM Certification and Verification Services 2nd Floor, Exchequer Court 33 St Mary Axe London EC3A

More information

VALIDATION REPORT RENEWAL OF CREDITING PERIOD

VALIDATION REPORT RENEWAL OF CREDITING PERIOD VALIDATION REPORT RENEWAL OF CREDITING PERIOD Kanfeng 15MW Hydropower Station Project, Min County, Dingxi City Prefecture, Gansu province, China REPORT NO. CDM-0111-RCP1 No distribution without permission

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT YUNNAN MANGLI HYDROPOWER PROJECT

VERIFICATION REPORT YUNNAN MANGLI HYDROPOWER PROJECT VERIFICATION REPORT YUNNAN MANGLI HYDROPOWER PROJECT Document Prepared By: Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS Report No.BVC/China-VR/7066/2012 Project Title Version Report ID Yunnan Mangli Hydropower

More information

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Monitoring period: 28/05/2009 to 27/05/2010 SGS Climate Change Programme SGS United

More information

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES (POA) REQUEST FOR REGISTRATION - INFORMATION AND REPORTING CHECK CHECKLIST

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES (POA) REQUEST FOR REGISTRATION - INFORMATION AND REPORTING CHECK CHECKLIST PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES (POA) REQUEST FOR REGISTRATION - INFORMATION AND REPORTING CHECK CHECKLIST PCP : Clean development mechanism project cycle procedure (version 02.0), EB 66, annex 64, 2 March 2012.

More information

Gold Standard Validation Report

Gold Standard Validation Report Gold Standard Validation Report Thai Biogas Energy Company Ltd. (TBEC) GOLD STANDARD VALIDATION OF THE CDM PROJECT: TBEC THA CHANG BIOGAS PROJECT REPORT NO. 1237633-GS 459 21 January 2011 TÜV SÜD Industrie

More information

MONITORING REPORT FORM CONTENTS

MONITORING REPORT FORM CONTENTS MONITORING REPORT FORM CONTENTS A. General description of the project activity A.1. Brief description of the project activity A.2. Project participants A.3. Location of the project activity A.4. Technical

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report Determination of Bayerngas Ökobonusprogramm Gewerbe- und Industriekunden JI Program of Activities in Germany (Track 1) Report No. 1101506 2008-07-22 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH,

More information

Criteria Catalogue: VER+

Criteria Catalogue: VER+ Criteria Catalogue: VER+ Prepared / changed: IS-CMS-MUC approved: IS-CMS-MUC page 1 of 10 CONTENTS Acronyms...3 Definitions...3 A. CRITERIA CATALOGUE... 4 1. Eligibility Criteria...4 2. Additionality...4

More information

Validation Report. Report No , Revision April 2007

Validation Report. Report No , Revision April 2007 Validation Report BIRLA PLUS CEMENT Validation of the Optimum utilisation of clinker for Pozzolana Portland Cement (PPC) production at Birla Plus Cement in Bathinda, Punjab, India project Report No. 869837,

More information

How to Select a DOE and preparation for validation and verification Presentation Report

How to Select a DOE and preparation for validation and verification Presentation Report How to Select a DOE and preparation for validation and verification Presentation Report Introduction to DOE s The two key functions of DOEs are: Validation: assessing whether a project proposal meets the

More information

Validation Report. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. Validation of the Bagasse based Co-generation Power Project at Khatauli, India

Validation Report. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. Validation of the Bagasse based Co-generation Power Project at Khatauli, India Validation Report Triveni Engineering and ndustries Ltd. Validation of the Bagasse based Co-generation Power Project at Khatauli, ndia Report No. 877510, Revision 01 2006, December 21 TÜV SÜD ndustrie

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report Determination of the Benaiciai Wind Power Project, Lithuania, Report No. 907778 Revision 2 2008, May 5 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH, Carbon Management Service Westendstr. 199-80686

More information

Annex 21. Methodological tool. Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality. (Version )

Annex 21. Methodological tool. Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality. (Version ) Page 1 Methodological tool Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality (Version 06.0.0) 1. The use of the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality is not mandatory for

More information

CDM AND VER VALIDATION PROTOCOL

CDM AND VER VALIDATION PROTOCOL APPENDIX A CDM AND VER VALIDATION PROTOCOL SAYALAR 30.4 MW WIND FARM PROJECT TURKEY FINAL REPORT NO. 2007-44003 REVISION NO. 01 Table 1 Mandatory Requirements for High Standard Voluntary Emission Reduction

More information

UNFCCC/CCNUCC. MONITORING REPORT FORM (F-CDM-MR) Version 02.0 MONITORING REPORT

UNFCCC/CCNUCC. MONITORING REPORT FORM (F-CDM-MR) Version 02.0 MONITORING REPORT CDM Executive Board Page 1 MONITORING REPORT FORM (F-CDM-MR) Version 02.0 MONITORING REPORT Title of the project activity Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45 MW Wind Power Project Reference number of the project activity

More information

Gangwon Wind Park Project

Gangwon Wind Park Project Report No. TA201-200501, Revision 03 Final Validation Report Gangwon Wind Park Project December 9, 2005 KOREA ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Contents 1. Summary of the Project Activity 2 2. Principles 3

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT OF INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT

VERIFICATION REPORT OF INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT VERIFICATION REPORT OF INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT Document Prepared By China Environmental United Certification Centre Co., Ltd. Project Title Inner Mongolia Hangjin Yihewusu Wind

More information

VALIDATION REPORT. Quezon City Controlled Disposal Facility Biogas Emission Reduction Project in Philippines REPORT NO REVISION NO.

VALIDATION REPORT. Quezon City Controlled Disposal Facility Biogas Emission Reduction Project in Philippines REPORT NO REVISION NO. Quezon City Controlled Disposal Facility Biogas Emission Reduction Project in Philippines REPORT NO. 2007-1142 REVISION NO. 02 Date of first issue: Project No.: 2007-07-09 44410005-08 Approved by: Organisational

More information

Approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0013

Approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0013 Approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0013 Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology

More information

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REPORT Datang Zhangzhou Wind Power Co., Ltd Fujian Zhangpu Liuao 45MW Wind Power Project Fourth Monitoring period: 28/05/2010 to 27/05/2011 (both days inclusive) SGS Climate

More information

Risk Based Verification Cambodia cook stove project

Risk Based Verification Cambodia cook stove project Risk Based Verification Cambodia cook stove project Chee.Keong.Lai@dnv.com www.dnv.com/certification/climatechange Contents 1. Introduction of Det Norske Veritas AS 2. Risk Based Validation/Verification

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report YARA Suomi Kemphos Oy, YARA International ASA N.serve Environmental Services GmbH DETERMINATION OF THE JI TRACK-1 PROJECT: YARA SIILINJÄRVI N2O ABATEMENT PROJECT IN FINLAND REPORT

More information

VALIDATION REPORT. Liaoning Changtu Quantou Wind Power Project in China. REPORT NO REVISION NO. 03 Deleted: 2

VALIDATION REPORT. Liaoning Changtu Quantou Wind Power Project in China. REPORT NO REVISION NO. 03 Deleted: 2 Liaoning Changtu Quantou Wind Power Project in China REPORT NO. 2007-1246 REVISION NO. 03 Deleted: 2 Date of first issue: Project No.: 2007-08-16 63602308 Approved by: Michael Lehmann, Technical Director

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report Determination of the Kimle Wind Turbine Park HUNGARY Report No. 536103-K 2004-12-17 TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Westendstr. 199-80686 Munich -

More information

CDM Validation Report

CDM Validation Report Project Title Qinghai Jingneng Ge'ermu Solar PV Power Project ERM CVS Project Reference Client Name 2401.v1 Qinghai Jingneng Construction Investment Co., Ltd. Client Address Floor 3, Jingfa Building, Kunlun

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT OF THE LUGOUHE HYDROPOWER PROJECT IN SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA

VERIFICATION REPORT OF THE LUGOUHE HYDROPOWER PROJECT IN SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA VCS Verification Report VERIFICATION REPORT OF THE LUGOUHE HYDROPOWER PROJECT IN SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA Voluntary Carbon Standard 2007.1 Report No: VCS 009-06, rev. 03 Germanischer Lloyd Certification

More information

INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT

INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT Document Prepared By Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. Project Title Inner Mongolia Hangjin Yihewusu Wind Power Project Version 2.0 Report ID

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application of a baseline and

More information

VER + Verification Report

VER + Verification Report VER + Verification Report Enecore Carbon Initial Verification and Verification of the First Monitoring Period of the Beijing No.3 Thermal Power Plant Gas-Steam Combined Cycle Project Using Natural Gas

More information

Draft revision to the approved consolidated baseline methodology ACM0007

Draft revision to the approved consolidated baseline methodology ACM0007 Draft revision to the approved consolidated baseline methodology ACM0007 Baseline methodology for conversion from single cycle to combined cycle power generation Sources This baseline methodology is based

More information

FIRST ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE REVISIONS TO AMS-III.BC TO INCLUDE MOBILE MACHINERY

FIRST ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE REVISIONS TO AMS-III.BC TO INCLUDE MOBILE MACHINERY FIRST ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE REVISIONS TO AMS-III.BC TO INCLUDE MOBILE MACHINERY Document Prepared By Stantec Consulting Ltd. Methodology Element Title Revisions to AMS-III.BC to Include Mobile Machinery

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application of a baseline and

More information

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD)

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) CDM Executive Board Page 1 PROGRAMME DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR SMALL-SCALE CDM PROGRAMMES OF ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-SSC-PoA-DD) Version 02.0 PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) PART I. Programme

More information

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD)

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) CDM Executive Board Page 1 PROGRAMME DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR SMALL-SCALE CDM PROGRAMMES OF ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-SSC-PoA-DD) Version 02.0 PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) PART I. Programme

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROGRAM ACTIVITY DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-CPA-DD) Version 01 CONTENTS

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROGRAM ACTIVITY DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-CPA-DD) Version 01 CONTENTS CDM Executive Board page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROGRAM ACTIVITY DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-CPA-DD) Version 01 CONTENTS A. General description of CDM programme activity (CPA) B. Eligibility of CPA

More information

Draft Determination Report

Draft Determination Report Draft Determination Report Yara Ambès Nitric Acid Plant DETERMINATION OF THE JI TRACK 1 PROJECT: YARA AMBÈS N 2 O ABATEMENT PROJECT REPORT NO. 600500300 9 September 2009 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS. Annexes

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS. Annexes CDM Executive Board page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application

More information

Validation Report. Korea South-East Power Co. (KOSEP) small scale hydroelectric power plants project MAR 5, Korea CDM Certification Office

Validation Report. Korea South-East Power Co. (KOSEP) small scale hydroelectric power plants project MAR 5, Korea CDM Certification Office Report No. AT201-200602, Revision 04 Validation Report Korea South-East Power Co. (KOSEP) small scale hydroelectric power plants project MAR 5, 2007 Korea CDM Certification Office KOREA ENERGY MANAGEMENT

More information

Determination Report

Determination Report Determination Report Determination of the Sopronkövesd Wind Farm HUNGARY Report No. 677087, Rev. 01 2005-08-18 TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Westendstr. 199-80686 Munich

More information

Validation Report. Monte Rosa S.A. Validation of the Monta Rosa Bagasse Cogeneration Project. Report No , Revision 0 20/12/2005

Validation Report. Monte Rosa S.A. Validation of the Monta Rosa Bagasse Cogeneration Project. Report No , Revision 0 20/12/2005 Validation Report Monte Rosa S.A. Validation of the Monta Rosa Bagasse Cogeneration Project Report No. 691171, Revision 0 20/12/2005 TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Westendstr.

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT VEJO GUSIS,UAB

VERIFICATION REPORT VEJO GUSIS,UAB VEJO GUSIS,UAB VERIFICATION OF THE LIEPYNES WIND POWER PARK JOINT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT MONITORING PERIOD: 1 JANUARY 2012 TO 31 OCTOBER 2012 REPORT NO. LITHUANIA-VER/0075/2012 REVISION NO. 01 BUREAU VERITAS

More information

-SUBMISSION BY MEXICO REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

-SUBMISSION BY MEXICO REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES -SUBMISSION BY MEXICO REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES I. Mandate The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA), at its twenty-fifth session

More information

Performance assessment report validation (Version 01.1)

Performance assessment report validation (Version 01.1) Performance assessment report validation (Version 01.1) SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Entity name: UNFCCC entity ref.no.: Site Visit made by the CDM-AT: Address of the site(s) visited: Scope(s) of accreditation

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT CARBON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

VERIFICATION REPORT CARBON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CARBON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GOLD STANDARD VERIFICATION OF THE HEBEI SHANGYI MANJING WEST WIND FARM PROJECT REPORT NO.BVC/CHINA-VR/7009/2010 REVISION NO.01 BUREAU VERITAS CERTIFICATION Great Guildford House,

More information

VALIDATION REPORT LIAONING KANGPING 24.65MW WIND FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS

VALIDATION REPORT LIAONING KANGPING 24.65MW WIND FARM PROJECT IN CHINA REPORT NO REVISION NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERITAS VALDATON REPORT LAONNG KANGPNG 24.65MW WND FARM PROJECT N CHNA REPORT NO. 2006-1174 REVSON NO. 01 DET NORSKE VERTAS VALDATON REPORT Date of first issue: Project No.: 2006-04-23 63602108 Approved by: Organisational

More information

VALIDATION OPINION FOR REVISION OF REGISTERED MONITORING PLAN

VALIDATION OPINION FOR REVISION OF REGISTERED MONITORING PLAN VALIDATION OPINION FOR REVISION OF REGISTERED MONITORING PLAN Rio Taquesi Hydroelectric Power Project UNFCCC Ref. No. 1031 SGS Climate Change Programme SGS United Kingdom Ltd SGS House 217-221 London Road

More information

Ref: Response to request for review Hubei Yuquanhe 25.2MW Hydropower Project with the Reference Number 2188

Ref: Response to request for review Hubei Yuquanhe 25.2MW Hydropower Project with the Reference Number 2188 Trading Emissions PLC Third Floor, Exchange House, 54/62 Athol Street, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 1JD, British Isles t: +44 (0) 1624 681200 f: +44 (0) 1624 681392 w: www.tradingemissionsplc.com Ref: Response

More information

A rating of Designated Operational Entities (DOEs) Accredited under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

A rating of Designated Operational Entities (DOEs) Accredited under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) A rating of Designated Operational Entities (DOEs) Accredited under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Scope, methodology and results Report for WWF Berlin, 27 May 2009 Lambert Schneider Lennart Mohr

More information

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Jan. 28, 2005 The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Converting emission reductions to Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) under the rules governing the Kyoto Protocol Presentation s Outline Jan. 28, 2005

More information

AMAYO PHASE II WIND POWER PROJECT

AMAYO PHASE II WIND POWER PROJECT AMAYO PHASE II WIND POWER PROJECT Report No: 8000402033-11/558 Date: 2012-03-21 TÜV NORD CERT GmbH JI/CDM Certification Program Langemarckstraße, 20 45141 Essen, Germany Phone: +49-201-825-3335 Fax: +49-201-825-3290

More information

DETERMINATION REPORT UAB NAUJOJI ENERGIJA

DETERMINATION REPORT UAB NAUJOJI ENERGIJA UAB NAUJOJI ENERGIJA DETERMINATION OF THE CIUTELIAI WIND POWER JOINT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT REPORT NO. LITHUANIA-DET/0056/2012 REVISION NO. 02 Report Template Revision 7, 29/10/2010 Date of first issue:

More information

Validation and Verification DOE s Perspective

Validation and Verification DOE s Perspective Validation and Verification DOE s Perspective Presented by: Asim Kumar JANA TÜV Rheinland (India) Pvt Ltd Presented at ADB Headquarters, Manila, Philippines 08 September 2010 1 Contents Validation and

More information

VALIDATION REPORT DAEGU & SINANJEUNGDO PV (PHOTOVOLTAIC) POWER PLANT PROJECT REPORT NO KOREAN FOUNDATION FOR QUALITY REVISION NO. 04.

VALIDATION REPORT DAEGU & SINANJEUNGDO PV (PHOTOVOLTAIC) POWER PLANT PROJECT REPORT NO KOREAN FOUNDATION FOR QUALITY REVISION NO. 04. VALIDATION REPORT DAEGU & SINANJEUNGDO PV (PHOTOVOLTAIC) POWER PLANT PROJECT REPORT NO. 2007-04 REVISION NO. 04. KOREAN FOUNDATION FOR QUALITY Report No : 2007-04, rev. 04 VALIDATION REPORT Date of first

More information

Description of the Bundle and the subbundles:

Description of the Bundle and the subbundles: CDM Executive Board Version 2, page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM FORM FOR SUBMISSION OF BUNDLED SMALL SCALE PROJECT ACTIVITIES (SSC-CDM-BUNDLE) SECTION A. General description of the Bundle A.1. Title

More information

Validation Report. Validation of the Alto Alegre Bagasse Cogeneration Project (AABCP), Brazil. Report No , Revision 01 B.

Validation Report. Validation of the Alto Alegre Bagasse Cogeneration Project (AABCP), Brazil. Report No , Revision 01 B. Validation Report USNA ALTO ALEGRE S/A - AÇÚCAR E ÁLCOOL Validation of the Alto Alegre Bagasse Cogeneration Project (AABCP), Brazil Report No. 694560, Revision 01 B 2005, December 22 TÜV ndustrie Service

More information

Santangou First and Second Grade Hydropower Stations Project MONITORING REPORT

Santangou First and Second Grade Hydropower Stations Project MONITORING REPORT Santangou First and Second Grade Hydropower Stations Project MONITORING REPORT Document Prepared By (Zhijie Duan, South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd.) Contact Information (j.duan@southpolecarbon.com)

More information

Your reference/letter of Our reference/name Tel. extension/ Fax extension Date/Document Page

Your reference/letter of Our reference/name Tel. extension/ Fax extension Date/Document Page TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH 80684 Munich Germany DAP-PL-2885.99 DAP-IS-2886.00 DAP-PL-3089.00 DAP-PL-2722 DAP-IS-3516.01 DPT-ZE-3510.02 ZLS-ZE-219/99 ZLS-ZE-246/99 Your reference/letter of Our reference/name

More information

Report No: QT-CDM /11

Report No: QT-CDM /11 VALIDATION REPORT ZHONGFANG COUNTY PAILOU HYDRO PROJECT, CHINA Report No: QT-CDM04-06 07/11 TÜV NORD CERT GmbH JI/CDM Certification Program Langemarckstrasse 20 45141 Essen, Germany Phone: +49-201-825-3335

More information

REFERENCE NUMBER: 2008/024/CDM/01 REPORT NUMBER: 03

REFERENCE NUMBER: 2008/024/CDM/01 REPORT NUMBER: 03 HIDROABANICO S.A. PERIODIC VERIFICATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY ABANICO HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT REFERENCE NUMBER: 2008/024/CDM/01 REPORT NUMBER: 03 Verification Type First periodic verification immediately

More information

Validation Report. BK Energia Itacoatiara Ltda. Validation of the BK Energia Itacoatiara Project, Brazil. Report No , September 8

Validation Report. BK Energia Itacoatiara Ltda. Validation of the BK Energia Itacoatiara Project, Brazil. Report No , September 8 Validation Report BK Energia Itacoatiara Ltda. Validation of the BK Energia Itacoatiara Project, Brazil Report No. 629709 2005, September 8 TÜV Industrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service

More information

Validation Report. Usina Nova América S/A. Validation of the. Nova América Bagasse Cogeneration Project (NABCP) 2005, December 13

Validation Report. Usina Nova América S/A. Validation of the. Nova América Bagasse Cogeneration Project (NABCP) 2005, December 13 Validation Report Usina Nova América S/A Validation of the Nova América Bagasse Cogeneration Project (NABCP) REPORT NO. 209131 REV. 2 B 2005, December 13 TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS. Annexes

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS. Annexes CDM Executive Board page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application

More information

Methodological tool Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system

Methodological tool Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM TOOL07 Methodological tool Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. SCOPE, APPLICABILITY, AND ENTRY INTO

More information

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD)

PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) CDM Executive Board Page 1 PROGRAMME DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR CDM PROGRAMMES OF ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-PoA-DD) Version 02.0 PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (PoA-DD) PART I. Programme of activities (PoA)

More information

Validation Report. Equipav S. A. Açúcar e Álcool. Validation of the Equipav Bagasse Cogeneration Project (EBCP) 23/12/2005

Validation Report. Equipav S. A. Açúcar e Álcool. Validation of the Equipav Bagasse Cogeneration Project (EBCP) 23/12/2005 Validation Report Equipav S. A. Açúcar e Álcool Validation of the Equipav Bagasse Cogeneration Project (EBCP) REPORT NO. 219107, REV. 02B 23/12/2005 TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management

More information

CDM Module 1. Introduction to Programmatic CDM (PoA) Lesson 2. How does the Programmatic CDM Work? Select Next to begin. Menu November 2011.

CDM Module 1. Introduction to Programmatic CDM (PoA) Lesson 2. How does the Programmatic CDM Work? Select Next to begin. Menu November 2011. CDM Module 1 Introduction to Programmatic CDM (PoA) Lesson 2 How does the Programmatic CDM Work? November 2011 Select Next to begin Next> Lesson Partners and Collaborators How does the Programmatic CDM

More information

Verification Report. Lovochemie a.s. Second Periodic Verification. of the agreed JI project. Nitrous Oxide Emission Reductions at Lovochemie - CZ

Verification Report. Lovochemie a.s. Second Periodic Verification. of the agreed JI project. Nitrous Oxide Emission Reductions at Lovochemie - CZ Verification Report Lovochemie a.s. Second Periodic Verification of the agreed JI project Nitrous Oxide Emission Reductions at Lovochemie - CZ Report No.: 1125273 March 14, 2008 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service

More information

JI DETERMINATION REPORT

JI DETERMINATION REPORT JI DETERMINATION REPORT JSC ZAPORIZHSTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE OXYGEN COMPRESSOR PLANT AT THE JSC ZAPORIZHSTAL, UKRAINE. Report No.: 8000361502 08/193 TÜV NORD CERT GmbH JI/CDM Certification Program Langemarckstrasse

More information

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application of a baseline and

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

VERIFICATION REPORT AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT LGAI Technological Center, S.A. Ctra. Accés a la facultat de Medicina, s/n Campus UAB E 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) Spain Tel.: +34 935 672 008 Fax.: +34 935 672 001 www.appluscorp.com VERIFICATION REPORT

More information

VALIDATION REPORT HUANENG NEW ENERGY INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. VALIDATION OF GUANGDONG NAN AO MW WIND FARM PROJECT

VALIDATION REPORT HUANENG NEW ENERGY INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. VALIDATION OF GUANGDONG NAN AO MW WIND FARM PROJECT TÜV ndustrie Service GmbH TÜV Rheinland Group VALDATON REPORT HUANENG NEW ENERGY NDUSTRAL CO. LTD. VALDATON OF GUANGDONG NAN AO 45.05 MW WND FARM PROJECT REPORT NO. 01 997 9105031898 REVSON NO. 03 CDM

More information

VERIFICATION REPORT RENERGA,UAB

VERIFICATION REPORT RENERGA,UAB RENERGA,UAB VERIFICATION OF THE BENAICIAI WIND POWER PROJECT MONITORING PERIOD: 01 JANUARY 2012 TO 31 OCTOBER 2012 REPORT NO. LITHUANIA-VER/0071/2012 REVISION NO. 01 Report Template Revision 4, 13/07/2011

More information

Final Determination Report

Final Determination Report Final Determination Report Determination of the Onega Town Coal-to-Waste Wood Energy Switch, NW- J project in Report No. 796 441, Rev. 03 TÜV SÜD ndustrie Service GmbH, Carbon Management Service Westendstr.

More information

Concepts of Clean Development Mechanism. Confederation of Indian Industry

Concepts of Clean Development Mechanism. Confederation of Indian Industry Concepts of Clean Development Mechanism Kyoto Protocol UNFCCC & Kyoto Protocol Kyoto Treaty was drawn up in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 th December, 1997 to implement United Nations Framework Convention for Climate

More information

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD) CDM Executive Board Page 1 PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR CDM PROJECT ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-PDD) Version 04.0 PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD) Title of the project activity Wind Farm Kladovo 1 Version number

More information

(20-MW Geothermal Power Generation)

(20-MW Geothermal Power Generation) MOEJ/GEC JCM Project Feasibility Study (FS) 2014 Summary of the Final Report (20-MW Geothermal Power Generation) (Implementing Entity: Mizuho Information and Research Institute, Inc.) 1.Overview of the

More information

VALIDATION REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT IN THE RAMLA CEMENT PLANT IN ISRAEL THROUGH INSTALMENT OF NEW GRINDING TECHNOLOGY

VALIDATION REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT IN THE RAMLA CEMENT PLANT IN ISRAEL THROUGH INSTALMENT OF NEW GRINDING TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT IN THE RAMLA CEMENT PLANT IN ISRAEL THROUGH INSTALMENT OF NEW GRINDING TECHNOLOGY REPORT NO. 2006-0712 REVISION NO. 02 DET NORSKE VERITAS VALIDATION REPORT Date

More information

Your Our reference/name Tel. Fax extension Date/Document Page

Your Our reference/name Tel. Fax extension Date/Document Page TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH 80684 Munich Germany DAP-PL-2885.99 DAP-IS-2886.00 DAP-PL-3089.00 DAP-PL-2722 DAP-IS-3516.01 DPT-ZE-3510.02 ZLS-ZE-219/99 ZLS-ZE-246/99 Your Our reference/name Tel. Fax extension

More information

International Water Purification Programme

International Water Purification Programme GOLD STANDARD FINAL VERIFICATION /CERTIFICATION REPORT International Water Purification Programme Report No.: EC09(B)2016006 Report Date: 13/03/2018 China Classification Society Certification Company 40,

More information