Informatics in the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory: Making It Work for You
|
|
- Eleanor Webb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Informatics in the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory: Making It Work for You 1. Welcome 1.1 Welcome
2 1.2 Title + Presenters
3 1.3 Course Outline
4 1.4 Informatics
5 1.5 Informatics
6 1.6 Emerging Trends
7 1.7 UPMC Division of Informatics
8 2. Overview of LIS 2.1 Overview of LIS
9 2.2 LIS
10 2.3 LIS Building Blocks
11 2.4 Client-Server Architecture
12 2.5 LIS Database
13 2.6 Dictionaries
14 2.7 Dictionaries
15 2.8 LIS
16 2.9 LIS Networks
17 2.10 EMR-LIS Data Flow
18 2.11 Outreach Connectivity
19 2.12 Health Level Seven (HL7)
20 2.13 Health Level Seven Example
21 2.14 Health Level Seven Example
22 2.15 LIS Functions
23 2.16 LIS (Data) Workflow
24 2.17 LIS (data) Workflow
25 2.18 Middleware
26 2.19 LIS-Middleware Relationship
27 2.20 LIS Trends
28 2.21 Questions 2.22 Knowledge Check (Drag and Drop, 0 points, unlimited attempts permitted)
29 Drag Item LIS app software Op software Drop Target lt blue triangel green triangle Hardware yellow triangle 3 DBMS dk blue triangle Security Measures cloud
30 Drag and drop properties Return item to start point if dropped outside any drop target Snap dropped items to drop target (Stack random) Allow only one item in each drop target Feedback: Great job! Now, Dr. Pantanowitz will talk about Bar Coding.
31 3. Tracking & Barcodes 3.1 Barcoding & Tracking
32 3.2 Lessons Learned from CP
33 3.3 Why Implement Tracking?
34 3.4 Lab Errors
35 3.5 Example: Benefit in AP
36 3.6 AP Test Cycle
37 3.7 Traditional vs. Modern Process
38 3.8 Barcodes
39 3.9 Barcode Driven System
40 3.10 Indelibility Issues
41 3.11 Indelibility Issues
42 3.12 Flexibility (label customization)
43 3.13 Tracking Options
44 3.14 Tracking Middleware
45 3.15 Example Labels
46 3.16 Flow of Barcode Related Data
47 3.17 RFID
48 3.18 RFID
49 3.19 AP Workflow
50 3.20 Specimen Collection
51 3.21 When can tracking start?
52 3.22 Accessioning
53 3.23 Labeling Specimens
54 3.24 Grossing
55 3.25 Grossing Workstations
56 3.26 Cassette Printers
57 3.27 Verification & Alert Solutions
58 3.28 Histology
59 3.29 Histology Life Cycle
60 3.30 Histology Life Cycle
61 3.31 Microtomy Workstation
62 3.32 Virtual Slide Folder
63 3.33 Archiving
64 3.34 Storage & Retrieval
65 3.35 Status Monitors
66 3.36 Histology Lab Status Monitors
67 3.37 Tracking Take Home Points
68 3.38 Questions
69 3.39 Implementing Barcoding
70 3.40 Specimen Lifecycle
71 3.41 Mystery Solved
72 3.42 Bar Coding Project
73 3.43 Previous Process
74 3.44 Design
75 3.45 Bar Coding Steps
76 3.46 Process with Barcode Implementation
77 3.47 Bar Coding Project
78 3.48 Post-Barcode Implementation
79 3.49 Barcoding Process
80 3.50 Barcoding Process
81 3.51 Baseline Data: Mislabeled Slides
82 3.52 Results: Reduced Mislabeled Slides
83 3.53 Results
84 3.54 Bar Coding: Experiences and Lessons Learned
85 3.55 Bar Coding: Problems
86 3.56 Conclusions 3.57 Knowledge Check (Drag and Drop, 0 points, unlimited attempts permitted)
87 Drag Item Drop Target Manual workflow Rectangle 8 Continuous tracking Rectangle 9 Automatic data capture Rectangle 9 Portable dashboards Rectangle 9 Logs for tracking Rectangle 8 Automated workflow Rectangle 9
88 Drag and drop properties Return item to start point if dropped outside any drop target Snap dropped items to drop target (Free) Feedback: Excellent! 3.58 Knowledge Check (Multiple Response, 10 points, 3 attempts permitted)
89 Correct X Choice Barcoding can reduce errors AND improve efficiency in the AP lab. Barcoding labels last forever. Equipment and software are affordable, but not always reliable. X Barcoding can enable specimen tracking While in-depth staff training is both time-consuming and expensive, it is necessary because barcoding eliminates human error. Feedback when correct: Good job! Now, Dr. Parwani will discuss Synoptic Reporting. Feedback when incorrect: Good try. The true statements are: Barcoding can reduce errors AND improve efficiency in the AP lab. Barcoding can enable specimen tracking.
90 4. Synoptic Reporting 4.1 Synoptic Reporting
91 4.2 Synoptic Reports in Pathology
92 4.3 Background
93 4.4 Background
94 4.5 Synoptic Report
95 4.6 Synoptic Reporting Tool
96 4.7 Synoptic Reporting: Entry Design
97 4.8 Synoptic Reporting: Entry Design
98 4.9 Synoptic Reporting: Dictionary Structure
99 4.10 Synoptic Worksheet
100 4.11 Synoptic Worksheet
101 4.12 Synoptic Worksheet
102 4.13 Synoptic Diagnosis Worksheet
103 4.14 Synoptic Diagnosis Worksheet
104 4.15 Diagnosis Report
105 4.16 Diagnosis Report
106 4.17 Synoptic Reporting: Workflow
107 4.18 Synoptic Reporting: Reporting
108 4.19 Synoptic Report
109 4.20 Synoptic Reporting: Leveraging Data
110 4.21 Search
111 4.22 Synoptic Reporting: Data Mining
112 4.23 Synoptic Reporting: Data Mining
113 4.24 Synoptic Reports of Molecular Testing
114 4.25 Synoptic Report with Prognostic and Theranostic Data
115 4.26 Mining Synoptic Data for Biospecimen Management
116 4.27 Using Synoptic Report for Evaluation for Performance
117 4.28 Benefits Realized at our Hospitals
118 4.29 Questions
119 4.30 Knowledge Check
120 5. Digital Pathology 5.1 Digital Imaging & the LIS
121 5.2 Digital Pathology
122 5.3 A Better Lens on Disease
123 5.4 Digital vs. Glass
124 5.5 Images in LIS
125 5.6 Current Applications of Digital Pathology In Our Practice
126 5.7 PACS Workflow Diagram
127 5.8 Why a pathology image should not be considered as a radiology image
128 5.9 Magnitude of Whole Slide Image Dataset Size
129 5.10 File Sizes
130 5.11 Pathology Image Metadata
131 5.12 Images in LIS
132 5.13 LIS Integration CONSIDERATIONS
133 5.14 Imaging Process
134 5.15 Imaging Process
135 5.16 Imaging Process
136 5.17 Imaging Process
137 5.18 Types of Digital Images
138 5.19 Types of Imaging Devices
139 5.20 Types of Imaging Devices
140 5.21 Types of Imaging Devices
141 5.22 Image Storage
142 5.23 You can't have everything.
143 5.24 Image Applications
144 5.25 Image Applications
145 5.26 Image Sharing
146 5.27 Hematology Analyzer & Remote Review System
147 5.28 Image Example
148 5.29 Enterprise-Wide Access
149 5.30 Enterprise-Wide Access
150 5.31 Enerprise-Wide Access
151 5.32 Workflow Factors
152 5.33 Image Management Options
153 5.34 Integral Image Management
154 5.35 Modular Image Management
155 5.36 Workstations
156 5.37 AP-LIS Integration
157 5.38 Combining Morphology with Patient Information
158 5.39 Combining Histology with Digital Pathology
159 5.40 The Histology Workstation
160 5.41 Combining Morphology with Patient Information
161 5.42 As digital pathology systems mature
162 5.43 Digital Imaging Roadmap
163 5.44 Improved Patient Care!
164 5.45 Improved Workflow = Reduced Errors + More Efficient
165 5.46 Digital Pathology: Value Proposition 5.47 Knowledge Check (Drag and Drop, 0 points, 1 attempt permitted)
166 Drag Item Drop Target Image metadata automatically stored in the LIS database INTEGRAL Gallery within LIS Greater user flexibility to share & manipulate images MODULAR Separate from the LIS Users need access to the LIS
167 INTEGRAL Gallery within LIS Not all devices are interfaced INTEGRAL Gallery within LIS Restricted editing & sharing tools INTEGRAL Gallery within LIS Images need to be fed into the LIS MODULAR Separate from the LIS Any imaging modality is supported MODULAR Separate from the LIS Requires Middleware MODULAR
168 Separate from the LIS Image format may be proprietary INTEGRAL Gallery within LIS Drag and drop properties Return item to start point if dropped outside any drop target Snap dropped items to drop target (Free) Feedback: Nice job. You're almost done with this course. Now, Dr. Parwani will conclude with a few brief points.
169 6. Conclusions 6.1 Conclusions
170 6.2 Conclusions
171 6.3 Questions
172 6.4 Thank you
173 6.5 Journal of Pathology Informatics 6.6 Knowledge Check (Text Entry, 10 points, 3 attempts permitted)
174 Feedback when correct: Excellent. You're almost done! Feedback when incorrect: The correct answer is:
175 Pathology informatics enables people and processes! 6.7 Congratulations!