Identifying the Significant Risks RICS

Transcription

1 Identifying the Significant Risks RICS

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES 2.2.1D ASBESTOS SURVEY OF MILLAIS BUILDING 1. Asbestos washers or shims to be used to obtain correct mullion level 2. Strategy for removal to be considered by project team. 3. Do we as a team have an understanding of what this entails with respect to our works? Is this a concrete structural mullion or the window mullion? 4. Surely we will not be taking these shims out of existing/retained structure or windows that we are not touching? Is the asbestos not encapsulated somehow? 5. We seem to need a better intrusive survey to ascertain the exact configuration and condition of the ACM. 6. Then we can devise a course of action. 7. Mark, Is a Refurbishment Asbestos survey being commissioned by the team or client during the summer vacation to clarify the issue? 8. Team- Will this need external or internal access or both? Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris

9 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES LEVEL 01 OVERVIEW ISSUES 1. Integration with existing deck and flat roof with fragile rooflights 2. Existing Services 3. Adjacent foundations and structural interfaces 4. Construction access into Atrium zone? 5. Levels, sloping site 6. Works inside, on-top of and to elevation of Millais during occupation? 7. Extent of decant of Millais during construction of links etc. 8. Construction phase fire strategy. 9. Diversion of Millais access and escape routes 10. Asbestos Survey of Millais- How much impact on design? Temporary protection of Millais elevation 11. Roof works to Millais with waterproofing and plant implications 12. Temporary structural works 13. Access doors into Atrium for cleaning MEWPS and large pieces of equipment for displays, exhibitions, etc. easily removable panels to front elevation Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris

10 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES ROOF LEVEL (TO BE UPDATED) CDM ISSUES Plant Layout & access routes to be drawn Anchor points & line for roped access to north, west and east elevations and fall prevention onto ETFE/ fragile atrium roof Roof Access points. East access stair and west escape ladder Preferable to have a 950mm min. high parapet around roof perimeter due to linear nature of plant space. However may be impossible due to plant area required. 2. Plant and Atrium Roof access to be considered in detail 3. Cleaning track for suspended chair or roped access to North Elevation of NATC. Alternatively a MEWP may be the client preferred option. 4. Suspended access avoids need for MEWP s to use car park to North Elevation 5. Roof access stairs /ladders to be suitable for carrying tools, filters, replacement parts etc. for roof plant Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris

11 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES D VIEW CDM ISSUES:- 1. High level access issues for cleaning and maintaining 2. Maintenance access to elevations 3. Maintenance to pod 4. Balcony Fronts 5. Atrium lighting access 6. Walkway at high level in atrium for roof vent access and maintenance internally 7. Fire stairs available for construction stage escape and existing Millais stairs for existing population evacuation. 8. Prefabrication of stair flights and carnage into location. Temporary or permanent handrail protection to be included Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris

12 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES 4.1 HIGH LEVEL CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE ACCESS Ceilings, soffites, etc in high or large spaces Minimize need for maintenance access Can alternative material be used eg. Metal sheet pre painted or powder coated. Temporary handrails required or permanent handrails installed early and protected DESIGN TEAM to review with contractor on cost, buildability and maintainability. Possibilities of prefabrication and lifting into position to be explored. 4.2 FAÇADE CONSTRUCTION SAFE WAH BUILDABILITY & Maintainability Long term term maintenance issues such as cost, access, frequency, etc. to be considered. Internal assembly process or external crane access. Type and durability of finish to be considered especially at low level adjacent to public walkways Edge protection required at roof level during construction. Scaffolding or MEWP access zones to be shown on site set-up plans to help analyse impact on other construction processes. Temporary cradles could also be used. PROJECT TEAM Scaffolding may be avoidable if all construction can be carried out from inside or via telehandlers or MEWPS, or cranes from outside. Integration of roof and cladding installations to be considered. Roped access or mast climbers for gaskets and mastics etc Early discussions with Suppliers /manufacturers required. 4.3 GLAZING CLADDING OPTION 1 INSTALLATION SAFE WAH Details of windows, glazing and envelope cladding to be developed. Speed of construction v safety, aesthetics and cost. Temporary protection required to slab edges before and during installation. Risks eliminated by temporary edge protection. Roped access for gasket installation and external finishing and cleaning. Team to develop a methodology of cladding from outside or inside. Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris

13 Designer CDM Analysis and Options Matrix - Hazard Identification and Significant Risk Management Project & No:-:- Solent University Campus Work Stage :- D Revision & Date: 7 th Issue Aug 16 th 2013 HAZARDS and SIGNIFICANT RISKS BUILDING FORM, MATERIAL,, ACTIVITY, LOCATION ELIMINATE or AVOID risks (During early design stages) SFARP REDUCE or MINIMIZE risks ALARP by :- (During all design stages) Safe systems of work & protection > INFORMATION To be provided with the design eg Specialist Design & client input CONTROL METHODS Contractor or Client Manage - ment Systems OTHER SPECIALIST GUIDANCE & COMMENTS Eg. References ACTIONS & DATES 4.4 CLADDING PROPOSALS 1. Cladding construction methods use of static or mobile cranes or internal telehandlers 2. Speed of construction due to tight programme 3. Roped access for gasketry and assistance during cladding process but also for future maintenance. 4. Sloping site makes mobile crane access more difficult 5. Future replacement strategy cannot use telehandlers due to raised access floors internally. Mobile cranes essential unlikely that a cradle/bmu system will be provided on roof. 6. Natural ventilation louvres ( if any)to be maintainable from inside Team Sign -off status Client S. Solent University Architect Scott Brownrigg Struct. Eng SWH (Str) Services Eng WSP (Ser) P. Contractor TBC Others P.M EC Harris CDM-C Scott Brownrigg Landscape Cost Consultant EC Harris