PHASE II DES. NO

Transcription

1 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT BOONE COUNTY, INDIANA VOLUME I: REPORT NARRATIVE, SUMMARY TABLES AND APPENDICES PHASE II DES. NO PREPARED FOR: BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LEBANON, INDIANA 157 EAST MARYLAND ST., INDIANAPOLIS, IN PHONE: FAX: DLZ JOB NO FEBRUARY 2016

2

3

4

5 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DON LAWSON JEFF WOLFE MARC APPLEGATE Deanna Willhoite Craig M. Parks, P.E. Boone County Auditor Boone County Engineer

6

7 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 PREFACE This Inspection Report continues Boone County s participation in the National Inspection Program, which is administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation, Local Transportation Section. This inspection and report was prepared in accordance with the National Inspection Standards as defined in 23 CFR 650. DLZ Indiana, LLC was authorized to conduct this inspection and prepare this report in accordance with an Agreement with Boone County, Indiana, dated June 17, The field inspections for Phase II were performed in September 2015 through October As required per the agreement, and in compliance with INDOT & FHWA requirements, a listing of the personnel involved in the inspections and their qualifications can be found on page 8. This inspection report should prove to be helpful to County Officials in determining problem areas, in posting safe bridge load limits, in establishing a plan for bridge improvements, and in the selection of safe school bus routes. This report should also further demonstrate the need for preventative maintenance and reemphasize the benefits of a well coordinated bridge improvement program. i

8 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT BOONE COUNTY INDIANA TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page Introduction and Scope of Report 1 Narrative 2 Listing of Personnel and Signature of all Team Leaders 8 Priority Schedule for Summary of Proposed Improvement Cost 9 15 Summary of Maintenance Items 17 Summary of Maintenance Cost Sorted by Number 27 Summary of Maintenance Cost Sorted by Year Needed and Sufficiency 32 Sufficiency and Structural/ Functional Classification Table 37 List of Safety Items Currently on 41 List of Needed Safety Improvements 46 Posted s 51 Closed s 52 s That Must Be Posted 53 Listing of s that Must Be Closed 54 Listing of s that Require Posting Changes 55 Listing of New Rehabilitated and ed s 56 Listing of Added and Archived/Deleted s 57 ii

9 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED Page Listing of Structure Types 58 s on National Highway System 59 Listing of Historical s 60 Listing of s Over Navigable Waterways 61 Summary of Changes in 91, 92A, 92B, AND 92C 62 Inspection Status of Scour Critical s 63 Load Capacity Status 64 Routine Inspection Status 69 Fracture Critical Inspection Status 74 Underwater Inspection Status 75 Special Inspection Status 76 Inspection Plan for Non-cycle Re-inspection of s 77 Master List In-depth Inspections 78 Summary of Major Changes or Deficiencies 79 Summary of Minor Changes or Deficiencies 86 Appendix A: Structure Types, Abbreviations, and Codes Appendix B: NBI Item Descriptions and Glossary of Terms VOULUME II Section 1: Inspection/ Inventory Reports 190 s Section 2: Additional Photos by iii

10 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE REPORT The purpose of this inspection was to provide a current condition analysis and report of vehicular bridges under the jurisdiction of Boone County. This inspection report includes a total of 190 structures. Since the last inspection in 2013, one (1) structure has been added, No. 181, County Road 400 South over Fishback Creek. For a summary and quantity of bridge types within the County, see page 58. Several of the bridges which were previously recommended for repair or replacement are in various stages of design and some of them have been replaced or rehabilitated (see page 56). However, several bridges still require repairs and rehabilitation. This report should serve as a reminder of some of the undesirable conditions in existence. For a summary of the major/ minor changes or deficiencies since the last inspection, see pages 79 through 92. The scope of this inspection report was limited primarily to structures with clear spans over twenty (20) feet in length and carrying vehicular traffic. The inspections were limited to monitoring the problem areas identified in the previous reports and checking for relatively evident deficiencies, which had occurred since the last inspection. Although the inspections and the report have been completed under the direction of a Registered Professional Engineer and every effort has been made to maintain a high level of professional judgment, no guarantees can be made that all deficiencies were noted. The Structure Inventory and Appraisal (SI&A) Reports have been prepared to meet the Federal Highway Administration s (FHWA) guidelines established in December of 1995 in accordance with the Indiana Department of Transportation s (INDOT) direction and interpretation. The bridge data is kept in the Inspect Tech database and will be transmitted to the State for their use in administering the State s Inspection Program. The effects of scour and fatigue cracking have become well known due to some recent bridge failures. As a result of these failures, more emphasis is being put on underwater inspection, the inspection of fracture critical details and bridges considered to be complex. A list of bridges requiring inspection of fracture critical details, underwater inspection, and other special inspections can be found in pages 74, 75, and 76 respectively. The results of these inspections are documented in separate reports. In accordance with the FHWA s Recording and Coding Guide for the Structural Inventory and Appraisal of the Nations s, hereafter referred to as the coding guide, the SI&A sheets shall include and keep updated (within 5 years) the ADT and the percentage of trucks at the structure. Where available, the traffic counts recorded on the SI&A sheets were updated based on information provided by the County. For any proposed design work at a structure, the County should perform a traffic analysis prior to proceeding with any design. All traffic counts for these Phase 2 inspections are up to date on all bridges open to traffic. All field notes, computations, reference data and other materials used in the preparation of this report are on file at the office of DLZ Indiana, LLC. Copies of relevant data for individual bridges will be furnished upon request. Page 1

12 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 NARRATIVE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE At this time there are seventy-six (76) bridges recommended for major improvements within Boone County. Of these, twenty-nine (29) are recommended for replacement, thirty (30) are recommended for rehabilitation, fourteen (14) are recommended for repairs, and three (3) are in the process of being removed by the County. There are also a few bridges in the County that have load capacities and roadway widths which are adequate for local traffic, but do not conform to current standards. These bridges could be replaced or widened, however, at this time they appear to be functioning adequately. Thus, they have not been recommended for major improvements. The estimated total cost for all of the major improvements is $27,469,000. A priority schedule for these major improvements is included on pages 9 to 16. This cost is based on a very narrow scope of work focused on repairing structures with noted major deficiencies and not structures requiring only routine maintenance tasks or safety feature upgrades. From project schedules established by INDOT Local Transportation Section, and from our experience with bridge replacement projects, it generally takes two to four years to let a construction contract once funding is established. The difference of two years is mainly due to the extent of the environmental documentation required for the project. Because of the length of time required and the limited availability of funding, it would be very optimistic to think that all of the bridges requiring rehabilitation or replacement could be upgraded within the recommended time periods. However, the recommended improvement schedule should be valuable in establishing maintenance schedules and setting bridge replacement priorities. A brief discussion of the methods used in arriving at the replacement costs as shown should be of interest at this point. Replacement structures, in practically all cases, will result in longer and wider bridges than those presently existing. Structure lengths were calculated with the aid of a curve which gives us a Length Expansion Factor given an existing bridge length. This curve is the result of a study conducted by the FHWA. The study compared the length of bridge replacements to the length of the bridges that they replaced. Allowance for skew and the straightening of roadway approaches has also been considered in determining the replacement length. Structure widths were based on minimum requirements as specified in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Estimated costs were based on current price data and are subject to inflation. In addition to the structural repair and replacement costs as listed, routine maintenance will be required on most bridges to reduce future problems from occurring. This includes, but not limited to, cleaning of drains, cleaning expansion joints, weed control, cleaning and painting small corroded areas, minor patching of cracks in concrete, placement of riprap in areas around foundations to control scour and erosion, and installing guardrail, transitions and approach rail to conform with current safety standards. The estimated total cost for all these maintenance needs is $2,485,000 for the years of 2016 through These estimates were based on the inspecting Page 2

13 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 engineer s visual evaluation. It should be realized that this type of cost is very hard to estimate on a general basis, and the costs shown should be considered as a guide to the magnitude and assumed complexity of maintenance needs rather than a firm dollar estimate. It is recommended, however, that all maintenance work be done in a timely fashion either to improve safety or to slow the rate of deterioration. The minor repairs made now will reduce later maintenance and repair costs and will extend the useful life of these bridges. See pages 27 through 36 for a summary of maintenance costs per bridge. Routine maintenance costs are not included in the Coding Guide of FHWA. However, these deficiencies are now included in the Maintenance Needs section of the Inspect Tech software. In addition to these comments, the following general conditions are worthy of noting: 1. s 32, 86, 202, 207 and 314 were found to have dirt and debris accumulating around their bearings. This condition leads to severe corrosion problems, which could be greatly reduced by periodically cleaning the bearing areas and painting the steel portions of the structure in these areas. Construction of small dams at bearing areas would help keep dirt, weeds and other residue away from the bearing areas. 2. Many of the steel beam bridges have paint in poor condition or have no paint. This condition leaves the steel unprotected and susceptible to rust and can drastically reduce the structural integrity of the bridge, depending upon its extent. A plan to sandblast and paint steel bridges could slow down the rate of deterioration of older structures and prevent the premature deterioration of newer structures. A properly performed painting will last approximately twenty years. s 86, 88, 92, 148, 150, 162, 166, 175, 232 and 314 were found to have the worst paint condition or no paint at all. 3. Several bridges have an excessive thickness of surfacing materials. Excessive depths of asphalt and gravel often result from correcting vertical alignment problems or from carrying roadway resurfacing operations across structures. Regardless of the cause, the extra dead load reduces the structure s live load capacity. Where possible, existing wearing surfaces should be reduced and future surfacing operations conducted in a manner to keep structure wearing surface depths to a minimum. When resurfacing bridges, it would prove beneficial to remove the existing surface prior to resurfacing. s 27, 48, 57, 70, 72, 97, 113, 158, 161, 166, 192, 195, 285 and 310 were found to have at least seven (7) inches of wearing surface material. 4. Adjacent prestressed concrete box beams with an asphalt overlay without a protective membrane are a concern. Several bridges of this type across the United States have had sudden failures. Rainwater penetrates the asphalt overlay and then sits on the top of the concrete box, causing deterioration of the concrete. Over time, this deterioration will advance to a point where the beam cannot handle the compressive stresses in the top of the box beam and the beam will fail suddenly in compression. There is no way to adequately inspect this area of the beam as it is completely hidden. Page 3

14 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 For this reason, DLZ is recommending that bridges 44, 45, 48, 60, 69, 82, 106, 117, 178, 216 and 257, which are showing signs of deterioration, have the asphalt removed and replaced with a reinforced concrete deck surface. 5. Many bridges have interior bents or piers, which tend to catch debris. Culverts also tend to catch debris because of their small openings. These structures should be checked periodically and the debris removed. For this reason, the use of culverts should be avoided in wooded areas. s 15, 27, 46, 47, 48, 71, 100, 102, 110, 132, 133, 134, 135, 137, 140, 154, 182, 189, 196, 198, 208, 211, 212, 215, 216, 219, 310, 312, and 594 were found to have significant amounts of accumulated debris. 6. Many bridges have problems with undermining to varying degrees at the end bents. Although undermining may not appear to be a serious problem initially, if it is not corrected it can lead to serious problems. Undermining can expose piles, leaving them susceptible to corrosion, thus reducing their capacity. Undermining can also be responsible for the settling and sometimes collapse of approaches. When undermining is detected, it should be repaired with flowable mortar and the bents protected with riprap. s 1, 20, 27, 46, 49, 91, 111, 130, 139, 148, 150, 159, 164, 168, 192, 204, 232, 308, 313, and 404 were found to have undermining/erosion. 7. Many bridges have a heavy amount of vegetation growing on, around and under the bridges. This vegetation reduces the visibility of the bridge and can shorten the life expectancy of the structure. The vegetation tends to hold water around the bridge and reduces air circulation. These two factors will cause the bridge to deteriorate at a faster rate. A plan to keep the vegetation away from the bridge will reduce the hazard of obscuring the bridge and at the same time allow more air circulation to keep the bridge dry. s 1, 15, 27, 28, 29, 30, 37, 43, 44, 45, 57, 59, 60, 64, 66, 68, 97, 100, 108, 110, 116, 137, 139, 140, 144, 179, 182, 184, 186, 192, 193, 195, 198, 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 210, 212, 215, 216, 219, 225, 257, 284, 287 and 403 were found to have the most vegetation encroaching the bridge. 8. Several bridges have utility conduits or pipes attached to the outside face of the bridge rail posts. This situation increases the risk of damage to the utility upon vehicular impact with the bridge rail. For this reason, utilities attached to the bridge rail should be avoided. 9. s 102, 127, 131, 133, 134, 142, 159, 193, 208, 211, 231, 232, 284 and 287 have no bridge railing and it is needed. This poses a safety risk for motorists driving across these structures. It should be noted, that continuous maintenance costs beyond these immediate requirements will be needed. However, estimating costs of such future maintenance is not within the scope of this report. In using the cost estimating sections of this report, readers are cautioned that preliminary estimates are very general and that substantial refinements can be obtained when in-depth evaluation and detailed plans for a particular project are prepared. Page 4

15 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 BRIDGE SIGNING AND MARKING The field inspection showed that a number of signs and markers are being used by the County but there still remains a demand for such safety devices. Counties traditionally have been reluctant to engage in extensive signing, probably due to the assumption that most persons traveling county roads are familiar with these roads. County signs are also subject to vandalism and can be a major expense for highly limited county budgets. However, recent changes in legal decisions governing liability in highway accidents and increases in county road traffic are forcing County Highway Departments to be conscious of signing and marking problems. As a minimum, signs warning of one lane or narrow bridges and low load limits are absolutely essential. In addition to these signs, reflectorized delineators warning of narrow shoulders or reflectorized warning signs at the ends of narrow bridges provide a highly visible means of warning the traveling public of hazardous situations. Weed and brush control should be exercised to maintain the visibility of such warning devices. The location of load limit signs deserves particular attention. It was noted during the inspection that most load limit signs were located within a few feet of the structure. It would be advantageous to both the motorists and the County to also locate these signs at intersections nearest the bridge, thereby warning the motorists at a point where they can change their route, if necessary. It would also be to the County s benefit to keep updated and well documented records of the posting of all load limit signs. For a listing of posted bridges, bridges that must be posted, and bridges requiring posting corrections, see pages 51, 53 and 55 respectively. In accordance with the INDOT Inspection Manual, a notice should be sent by the County to the school districts advising them of the location of all bridges with a 12 Ton or less capacity. This notice should be sent annually or when a bridge s posting status changes. A listing of bridges that are closed and must be closed have also been included, see pages 52 and 54 respectively. The criteria for posting bridge end markers is called out in the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices; and the Indiana Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. These manuals only require bridge end markers for One Lane and Narrow structures or where objects not actually in the roadway may be so close to the edge of the road that they need a marker. It is this latter criteria that governs our judgment when recommending posting of markers for certain structures wider than a Narrow. However, the final use of the markers at locations other than at a One Lane or a Narrow will remain at the discretion of the County. Pages 41 thru 45 list those safety items that are currently installed. Pages 46 thru 50 of this report present the schedule of safety improvements which are recommended for use at the bridge designated. Even though it is listed in the table as a required Safety Improvement in most cases the element exists but is substandard. The recommended signing set out in these tables is intended as a minimum and should be evaluated in the field for possible expansion, especially if features such as intersections, curves, or other hazards are in close proximity to the bridge. The County should evaluate each structure with substandard barrier rails and set up a program to upgrade the rails as warranted by the bridge geometry, functional classification, and AADT. Page 5

16 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 BRIDGE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL CRITERIA The condition of each bridge has been assessed by the inspecting engineer and ratings have been assigned to the features as listed in accordance with the guidelines referenced herein. In general, a rating 6 or 7 indicates a potential for minor maintenance. A rating of 5 indicates a potential for major maintenance and ratings of 4 or less indicate a potential for major rehabilitation or replacement. The appraisal of each structure with the deficiencies as noted is based on criteria dictated by the FHWA Coding Guide. s 6 and above indicate that conditions are equal to or better than present minimum criteria. s 4 and 5 indicate conditions meeting minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is. s 3 and lower indicate intolerable conditions requiring repair or replacement with high priority. The capacity of each structure was determined by calculations where possible. Where sufficient data is unavailable, assumptions were made to arrive at a rating. The calculations were based on field dimensions, on the condition of the superstructure and on the judgment of the engineer. They are by no means intended to completely analyze the entire structure or to guarantee the capacity ratings. This is clearly beyond the scope of this project and would be impossible without complete plans and a more detailed inspection and investigation. They are intended to be a best estimate for these ratings and serve as the basis for determining the safe live load capacity. The status of the load rating calculations can be found in pages 64 through 68. Certain criteria were established as a practical method for arriving at a rating for each of the structure types. The procedures used, in accordance with guidelines of this study, were as follows: General: The supporting bridge floor members in all cases were assumed to be the limiting component and subject of analysis. Members were assumed to be less than fully effective where portions of members were lost due to corrosion or spalling. Steel Beams: Member size and spacings were measured. Superstructure dead loads were approximated based on field measurements. Distribution of wheel loads was determined in accordance with current AASHTO requirements. ASTM A36 steel (36 ksi yield stress) was assumed for bridges built since 1963 when plans were not available and A7 steel (33 ksi yield stress) was assumed for construction between 1936 and Steel with 30 ksi yield stress was assumed for steel construction between 1905 and For construction prior to 1905 steel with 26 ksi yield stress was assumed. Inventory ratings were based on 55 percent of yield stress; while the operating rating was based on 75 percent of yield stress. Cast-in-Place Concrete Flat Slabs, Arches & Girders: Member sizes and spacing were measured. Where plans were available the specified concrete compressive strength, reinforcement yield strength and size and location of reinforcement was used in the strength calculations. Where this data was not available the guidelines outlined in the AASHTO Manual for Condition Evaluation of s were followed. For structures built prior to 1954 the Page 6

17 BOONE COUNTY BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Phase II February 2016 inventory rating was based on an allowable steel stress of 18 ksi, the operating rating was based on an allowable steel stress of 25 ksi and a yield strength of 33 ksi. For structures built after 1954 the inventory rating was based on an allowable steel stress of 20 ksi, the operating rating was based on an allowable steel stress of 28 ksi and a yield strength of 40 ksi. The concrete compressive strength for structures built prior to 1959 was assumed to be 2500 psi and 3000 psi after For a concrete compressive strength of 2500 psi, the allowable stress for the inventory rating was 1000 psi and 1500 psi for the operating rating. For a concrete compressive strength of 3000 psi, the allowable stress for the inventory rating was 1200 psi and 1900 psi for the operating rating. Prestressed Concrete Box Beams and I-Beams: When detailed drawings were not available, member capacities were determined with the aid of load tables and the 1960 s Prestressed Beam Standard Drawings published by the Indiana Department of Transportation. Since the number of prestressing strands was not known, a conservative estimate was made. When plans were not available, an initial concrete strength of 4,000 psi and a final concrete strength of 5,000 psi were assumed. In addition, strands were eliminated at crack locations or where spalls were evident. Timber Slabs: Member sizes and spacings were measured. Superstructure dead loads were approximated based on the field measurements. The distribution of wheel loads was determined in accordance with current AASHTO requirements. In accordance with INDOT specifications, timber slabs were assumed to be Douglas Fir Larch, No. 1 or better with a bending strength of 1150 psi. The actual allowable stress for the operating and inventory ratings was based on the bending strength multiplied by various adjustment factors. For both the inventory and operating rating, a repetitive member factor of 1.15 and a size factor (which depends on thickness & depth) of 1.0 to 1.2 were used. For the inventory rating a load duration factor of 1.15 was used while 1.33 was used for the operating rating duration factor. In addition to the adjustment factors, the allowable operating rating stress was increased by 33%, in accordance with AASHTO. In order to further facilitate and clarify interpretation of the various items contained on the Structure Inventory and Appraisal Sheets, a brief explanation of each item is listed in Appendix B. It is hoped that the format of this report will provide a convenient means of reference for anyone using it and assist in achieving an improved, adequate and safe bridge system within Boone County. Page 7

18 Page 8

19 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No. Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: CR 300S JACKSON RUN , CR 200E SUGAR CREEK ,194 1, CR 875W MDL JAMESTOWN RD CUNNINGHAM DITCH WALNUT FORK SUGAR CR CR 400S SMITH DITCH CR 350N WILEY CREEK CR 600S GRASSY BRANCH CR 600E MOUNTS RUN CR 300S JACKSON RUN , CR 600W BIG RACCOON CREEK MAIN STREET PRAIRIE CREEK CR 125E SMITH DITCH CR 100N CR 200S HEATH & LANE DITCH BRANCH OF WALNUT FORK CR 500S BETT DITCH CR 350S SMITH DITCH CR 700W BIG RACCOON CREEK MOUNT ZION ROAD SANITARY DITCH /19/2016 Page 9

20 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No CR 400E Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) HEATH & LANE DITCH WIND HAVEN LANE PRAIRIE CREEK HAZELRIGG ROAD DEER CREEK TEMPLIN ROAD CR 200N LITTLE EAGLE CREEK ,150 1,140 1,710 HEATH & LANE DITCH CR 25W SMITH DITCH PARK STREET PRAIRIE CREEK HEATH & LANE CR 250E DITCH CR 600W WOLF CREEK CR 600W CR 300E W FORK BIG WALNUT CREEK HEATH & LANE DITCH Total Construction Cost for Category 1: $ 19,704, /19/2016 Page 10

21 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No. Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: CR 450N PRAIRIE CREEK CR 1100E FINLEY CREEK CR 100S BIG EAGLE CREEK SUGAR CREEK ROAD SUGAR CREEK WILLIAMS STREET PRAIRIE CREEK CR 400E MUD CREEK BLOOR LANE ZIONSVILLE TRAIL/DITCH CR 1100E BIG EAGLE CREEK CR 350W PRAIRIE CREEK SYCAMORE STREET EAGLE CREEK AND TRAIL , CR 400N BIG EAGLE CREEK CR 450N BROWN'S WONDER CREEK CR 100S PRAIRIE CREEK SUGAR CREEK ROAD PRAIRIE CREEK CR 1000W LITTLE SUGAR CREEK KISSEL ROAD FISHBACK CREEK /19/2016 Page 11

22 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No. Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CR 600E MOUNTS RUN CR 550E CARROLL DITCH FRANKFORT AVE SUGAR CREEK HUNT CLUB ROAD FISHBACK CREEK CR 500W N FORK BIG WALNUT CREEK CR 650E FISHBACK CREEK CR 550S FISHBACK CREEK CR 500W WOLF CREEK CR 1075W CR 800S CR 500S GOLDSBERRY CREEK W FORK BIG WALNUT CREEK BIG RACCOON CREEK BLUBAUGH AVE REAGON RUN CR 675N MUD CREEK CR 825N BROWN'S WONDER CREEK Total Cost for Category 2: $ 6,942, CATEGORY: 3 None 2/19/2016 Page 12

23 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No. Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: CR 950E MOUNTS RUN CR 1100W WALNUT FORK CR 1175W WALNUT FORK OF SUGAR CR CR 550N WOLF CREEK CR 500W PRAIRIE CREEK CR 350N WOLF CREEK CR 1050W OAK ROAD WALNUT FORK OF SUGAR CR FISHBACK CREEK CR 300S JACKSON RUN CR 550S EDLIN DITCH CR 1000E BIG EAGLE CREEK ZIONSVILLE ROAD EAGLE CREEK CR 450E BRANCH OF FISHBACK CREEK CR 250E BROWN'S WONDER CREEK Total Cost for Category 4: $ 537, /19/2016 Page 13

24 PRIORITY SCHEDULE FOR BRIDGE (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Priority No. No. Facility Carried by Structure Feature Intersected Year Needed Type of Work HS Inventory (Tons) Sufficiency Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: CR 1175W WHITE CREEK RAY ROAD GOLDSBERRY CREEK N JAMESON STREET PRAIRIE CREEK Total Cost for Category 5: $ 286, * Note: and Estimated Total Costs do not include maintenance costs. Type of Work Description: 31 Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substandard bridge geometry. 35 rehabilitation because of general deterioration or inadequate strength. 36 deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. 37 deck replacement with only incidental widening. 38 Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. 2/19/2016 Page 14

25 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COST (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Year Needed Number of s Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: ,446 6, ,856 2, ,651 5, , ,232 1, $ 19,704, CATEGORY: , ,091 1, , $ 6,942, CATEGORY: 3 None Page 15 2/19/2016

26 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COST (1) REPLACEMENT (2) REHABILITATION (3) WIDENING (4) REPAIR (5) ELIMINATION Year Needed Number of s Estimated Cost (x$1,000) Estimated Total Constr. Cost (x$1,000) CATEGORY: $ 537, CATEGORY: $ 286, Page 16 2/19/2016

27 Summary of Maintenance Items Date Date s Number Status Reported Priority Work Code Completed Deficiency Description Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION Open 09/28/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE Open 10/19/2015 Green Approach SEALED CRACKS IN APPROACH PAVEMENT Open 10/19/2015 Green Approach SEALED CRACKS IN NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT Open 09/28/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS AT BOTH PIERS Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap ADD RIPRAP TO UPSTREAM NOSE OF PIERS Open 09/28/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE Open 09/28/2015 Green Substructure REPAIR PILE ENCASEMENT WITH CONCRETE TOEWALL Open 09/28/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL END MARKERS Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap FIX SHOULDER EROSION BEHIND SLAB Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap RIPRAP ABUTMENTS Open 09/28/2015 Green Substructure PATCH ABUTMENT SPALLS Open 09/28/2015 Green Approach GRAVEL APPROACHES TO BRIDGE FOR APPROXIMATELY 20' EACH SIDE Open 09/28/2015 Green Drain FIX EROSION AT CORNERS Open 09/28/2015 Yellow Substructure FIX SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ABUTMENT TO RESTORE BEARING OF BEAM COMPLETED 09/28/2015 Red Signage Install / Signage 10/09/2015 INSTALL LOAD POSTING SIGNS Open 10/19/2015 Green Joint REPLACE JOINT MATERIAL Open 10/19/2015 Green Deck Cleaning & Flushing CLEAN DECK Open 10/19/2015 Green Approach SEALED CRACKS IN APPROACHES Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH RAIL WITH BURIED END TREATMENTS Open 10/02/2015 Green Deck Cleaning & Flushing CLEAN GUTTERS Open 10/02/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal CLEAR DRIFT FROM NORTH SPAN Open 10/02/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP AT WINGWALL CORNER OF SPILL SLOPE COMPLETED 10/02/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage PLACE END MARKER AT SOUTHEAST CORNER Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AND DEBRIS WHICH IS HIDING LOAD POST SIGN AT WEST WEND (EASTBOUND LANE) COMPLETED 10/02/2015 Red Signage Install / Signage 01/19/2016 INSTALL LOAD POSTING SIGN AT EAST END (WESTBOUND LANE) Open 10/02/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL END MARKERS Open 10/02/2015 Green Deck Cleaning & Flushing CLEAR DIRT FROM JOINTS Open 10/02/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE Open 10/02/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CUT TREES AND BRUSH. Spray Open 10/02/2015 Green Deck Cleaning & Flushing REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBS Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall Open 10/02/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray Page 17 INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL TRANSITIONS AND END TREATMENTS. CLEAR VEGETATION FROM AROUND STRUCTURE. 02/26/2016

28 Summary of Maintenance Items Date Date s Number Status Reported Priority Work Code Completed Deficiency Description Open 10/02/2015 Green Drain INSTALL DECK DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS Open 10/02/2015 Green Drain INSTALL DRAIN PIPE AT SOUTHEAST END OF CENTER SPAN Open 10/02/2015 Green Superstructure Cleaning & Flushing PERIODICALLY CLEAR TRUSS MEMBERS AND BEARINGS FROM DEBRIS Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall REPLACE GUARDRAIL END TREATMENT AT SOUTHEAST END Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS. CLEAR VEGETATION AND TREES ON NORTH SIDE Open 10/02/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray Open 10/02/2015 Green Superstructure PATCH SPALLS AND DELAMINATION AREAS IN COPING OF SLAB Open 10/02/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL END MARKERS Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACHING GUARDRAIL AT BRIDGE CORNERS Open 09/22/2015 Green Approach RESURFACE WEARING SURFACE Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/22/2015 Green Substructure PATCH ABUTMENTS Open 09/22/2015 Green Approach PATCH WEARING SURFACE Open 09/22/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION. Spray Open 09/22/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION/DEBRIS. Spray Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Approach MONITOR APPROACH SETTLEMENT Open 09/22/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/22/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE FENCE ACROSS CREEK ON SOUTH SIDE Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Substructure INSTALL RIPRAP AROUND EACH END BENT Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Joint ADD FILLER JOINT BETWEEN BEAMS AT INTERIOR BENTS Open 09/22/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS UNDER AND AROUND BRIDGE Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Substructure EPOXY COAT/PAINT INTERIOR BENT PILES Open 09/22/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS/FENCE/TREE IN CHANNEL Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Approach REPAIR DROPOFFS AT BRIDGE CORNERS WITH WIDENED PAVED SHOULDERS Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/22/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap RIPRAP NORTH AND SOUTH ABUTMENTS Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Green Approach SEAL/PATCH CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Erosion Control / Rip Rap FIX EROSION AT BRIDGE ENDS. Page 18 02/26/2016

29 Summary of Maintenance Items Date Date s Number Status Reported Priority Work Code Completed Deficiency Description Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Green Approach MILL OFF EXCESSIVE ASPHALT Open 09/21/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION. Spray Open 09/21/2015 Green Substructure PATCH ABUTMENT CORNERS Open 09/21/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap ADD RIPRAP TO SPILL SLOPES Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION. Spray Open 09/23/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AND DEBRIS IN CHANNEL Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE BRIDGE & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/21/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION. Spray Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Approach FIX SETTLEMENT IN SOUTHWEST SIDE (EAST BOUND LANE) Open 09/21/2015 Yellow Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray UPGRADE GUARDRAIL & APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS B Open 09/21/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap REPAIR EROSION HOLE IN NORTHEAST CORNER Open 09/21/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CLEAR VEGETATION. Spray Open 09/21/2015 Grey Drain CLEAN DECK DRAINS Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall ADD APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO ALL CORNERS OF BRIDGE Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE BRIDGE RAILING & APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/23/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS IN CHANNEL Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACHING GUARDRAIL AT ALL CORNERS Open 09/23/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap FILL IN SHOULDER EROSION AT ALL CORNERS COMPLETED 09/23/2015 Red Signage Install / Signage 01/18/2016 UPDATE LOAD POSTING SIGNS FROM 15 TON TO 13 TON WEIGHT LIMIT Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Substructure EPOXY INJECT CRACKS IN ABUTMENTS Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Signage Install / Signage REPLACE LOAD POSTING SIGN AT SOUTH SIDE WITH STANDARD WEIGHT LIMIT SIGN. INSTALL APPROACH GUARDRAIL Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall Open 09/23/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL ADEQUATE APPROACH GUARDRAIL Open 09/23/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP AROUND ABUTMENTS Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall REATTACH ONE BRIDGE THRIE BEAM RAIL POST AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Concrete Crack Seal SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE AT BRIDGE ENDS AND CENTER-LINE Open 09/22/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap UNDERPIN END BENTS AND PROTECT WITH RIPRAP. 02/26/2016 Page 19

30 Summary of Maintenance Items Date Date s Number Status Reported Priority Work Code Completed Deficiency Description PROTECT WITH RIPRAP Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall REPLACE BRIDGE RAIL WITH STANDARD RAIL Open 09/22/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH GUARDRAIL WITH END TREATMENTS Open 09/28/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH RAIL UNTIL REPLACEMENT FOR TRAVEL SAFETY COMPLETED 09/28/2015 Red Signage Install / Signage 01/18/2016 REPLACE LOAD POSTING SIGN ON NORTHEAST SIDE (DEFACED) Open 09/28/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall REPLACE GUARDRAIL DAMAGED AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST QUADRANTS Open 09/28/2015 Green Approach MILL ASPHALT OVERLAY, PLACE PREFORMED FABRIC MEMBRANE AND PLACE A NEW OVERLAY Open 09/28/2015 Green Approach PLACE GATE ACROSS BRIDGE Open 09/28/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage REPLACE "BRIDGE OUT" SIGN WITH "DEAD END" Open 10/19/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION ACROSS BRIDGE Open 10/19/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap RIPRAP WEST ABUTMENT Open 10/19/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall REPLACE END MARKERS. INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap CLEAR RIPRAP FROM NORTHEAST DITCH Open 10/02/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH RAIL WITH END TREATMENTS TO CURRENT STANDARDS. CLEAR VEGETATION Open 10/02/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray Open 10/02/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL GUARD AND APPROACH RAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/02/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DRIFT FROM INLET Open 10/02/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP Open 10/02/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP AT END BENTS AND GROUT VOIDS UNDER CAPS Open 10/02/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL BRIDGE END MARKERS Open 10/02/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL BRIDGE END MARKERS Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 09/28/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR HEAVY VEGETATION AT END SPANS Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE FILL AT SOUTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT ALL CORNERS COMPLETED 10/19/2015 Red Signage Install / Signage 01/18/2016 REPLACE LOAD POSTING SIGN AT SOUTH SIDE (DEFACED) Open 10/19/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE Open 10/19/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal CLEAR DEBRIS IN CHANNEL Open 09/28/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL BRIDGE MARKERS Open 09/28/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap FILL IN UNDERMINED AREAS OF ABUTMENT CORNERS BELOW 02/26/2016 Page 20

31 Summary of Maintenance Items Date Date s Number Status Reported Priority Work Code Completed Deficiency Description ABUTMENT CORNERS BELOW WIDENED CAP Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall UPGRADE BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL BRIDGE END MARKERS Open 10/19/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL END MARKERS Open 10/19/2015 Green Approach SEALED CRACKS IN APPROACHES Open 10/20/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray Open 10/20/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall Open 10/20/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall Open 10/20/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall CLEAR VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE. INSTALL ADDITIONAL APPROACH RAIL WITH BURIED END TREATMENTS TO CURRENT STANDARDS. INSTALL GUARDRAIL. POST BRIDGE END MARKERS. INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE GROUT AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ABUTMENT Open 10/20/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL APPROACH AND BRIDGE RAIL WITH BURIED ENDS AND END MARKERS TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/20/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal CLEAR DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT FROM Open 10/20/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall PIPES. INSTALL BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAIL WITH BURIED ENDS AND END MARKERS Open 10/20/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap FILL ERODED AREAS ON BOTH SHOULDERS Open 10/20/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal CLEAR DRIFT FROM CHANNEL AND INSIDE PIPES Open 10/20/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE CATTLE GATES Open 10/19/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE DEBRIS Open 10/19/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap PLACE RIPRAP AT INLET Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal CLEAR DEBRIS IN CHANNEL Open 10/19/2015 Yellow Guardrail / Barrier Wall INSTALL BRIDGE RAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO CURRENT STANDARDS Open 10/19/2015 Green Erosion Control / Rip Rap INSTALL RIPRAP AT WEST ABUTMENT Open 10/19/2015 Green Signage Install / Signage INSTALL END MARKERS Open 10/19/2015 Green Deck Cleaning & Flushing CLEAR DEBRIS FROM DECK Open 10/19/2015 Green Brush Cutting / Herbicide CUT VEGETATION AROUND BRIDGE. Spray Open 10/19/2015 Green Channel Debris Removal REMOVE FENCES CROSSING CREEK. Page 21 02/26/2016