LTISD PURCHASING DEPARTMENT HWY 71, BLDG B AUSTIN, TX 78738

Transcription

1 LTISD PURCHASING DEPARTMENT HWY 71, BLDG B AUSTIN, TX March 23, 2018 NOTICE TO VENDORS This notice serves as ADDENDUM #3 for Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP), Number , CSP Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects This addendum is being issued for clarification and information purposes pertaining to the above referenced RFP. Failure to acknowledge this Addendum may be grounds for disqualification. 1. CHANGE SECTION IV Price Proposal Changed header to reflect Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects The Price Proposal form is changed in its entirety. Proposers must use Price Proposal ADDENDUM 3 form that is attached. Failure to use the form with the indication of Addendum 3 in the title will be grounds for disqualification. 2. Attached Geotechnical Boring Logs. 3. CHANGES to the following Drawing Sheets reference CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. and Malone Wheeler, Inc. Addendum #3 3/22/18 document: 3.1. Sheet C-0 Cover Sheet 3.2. Sheet HBMS-3 Utility Plan 3.3. Sheet HBMS-5 Grading & Drainage Plan 3.4. Sheet HBMS-6 Track & Turf Field 3.5. Sheet LTMS-2 Demolition Plan 3.6. Sheet LTMS-3 Utility Plan 3.7. Sheet LTMS-5 Grading & Drainage Plan 3.8. Sheet LMS-6 Synthetic Turf Plan 3.9. Sheet LTHS-3 Utility Plan Sheet LTHS-5 Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet LTHS-6 Track & Turf Plan Sheet ST-1 Stadium Field Sheet D-2 Detail Sheet Sheet D-3 Detail Sheet Civil Sheets 05, 06, 07, 09 and 10 of Contractors must contact the Bid Center with Fields and Associates Architects at for the most current version of drawings / specifications including Addendum #3 revised drawings. 5. Please provide a cross-sectional detail for the gravel access road to be constructed at Lake Travis High School. RESPONSE: On Civil Drawing Sheets 5 and 6 at Lake Travis High School Track, include the following: The gravel drive is to match the existing gravel drive in width, material, etc. 6. Please clarify limits of Mondo track surfacing for alternate #7 on Stadium Field sheet ST-1, specifically if surfacing will be required under the stairs and on the water and electric boxes located in the sidewalk. RESPONSE: Drawings, Sheet ST1 Clarification: In the Southwest corner of the stadium field area, no sports surfacing is required beneath the metal stairway or over the covers of the electrical and water utility boxes.

2 CSP Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects 2018 Addendum #3 Page 2 7. The track base mat specification section calls for cryogenically processed rubber to be used. Please confirm if SBR rubber may be used instead. RESPONSE: Specifications, Section Polyurethane Track Surface Base Mat, Paragraph 2.01.A Delete requirement for cryogenically processed SBR rubber and replace with SBR rubber. 8. Please clarify if our bid must include the removal or relocation of materials found on the SW side of the existing building at Lake Travis High School. RESPONSE: At LTHS Track, LTISD will remove the surplus building and construction materials located behind the Storage Building prior to commencement of construction activities. 9. Please clarify where the electrical connection will be at all schools. RESPONSE: Refer to revised drawing sheets. Q1. Missing Sheets: Field Events Grading Area and D-4 Details. Are these sheets labeled wrong: LTHS-6 Track and Turf Field and ST-1 Stadium Field? They do not match what is on the Index Sheet A1. Refer to revised drawing sheets. Q2. Does Lake Travis or LTISD have a limitation on work days, such as weekend work limitations? A2. Construction activities are limited to Monday thru Friday, 7:00am 7:00pm. Any additional time shall be coordinated with LTISD and local government authorities. Q3. Is there a limitation on work hours (start/stop) hours? A3. See answer A2 above. Q4. Can you provide the class schedule, exam schedule, quiet days for exam prep that would be relevant during the early phases of construction? A4. Check the District s website calendar schedules. All other terms and conditions and specifications stated in the original RFP remain in effect. All forms provided in the District s proposal must be submitted with your proposal. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this addendum. Sincerely, Angie Marsh, CTSBO Director of Purchasing, LTISD marsha@ltisdschools.org Attachment Acknowledgment: Company Name Authorized Signature Date Printed Name Title

3 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects 2018 Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP) Number SECTION IV PRICE PROPOSAL FORM ADDENDUM 3 Proposers are to submit the price to provide the construction services for turf and track projects as per the specifications and drawings provided by the A/E. All scheduled work is to be included in the base bid at an estimated construction cost of $2,800, Schedule of Allowances: A. Installation of irrigation system at Lake Travis High School Track - $30, B. Construction of the reinforced concrete retaining wall at the long jump area of Lake Travis High School Track - $35, Base Bid Proposal 50 points: Turf and Track replacement at HBMS, LTMS and LTHS as per the specification and drawings provided by the A/E. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.1. Alternate No. 1: Furnish and install an E-Layer type shock pad system over the entire surface of the synthetic turf field at Lake Travis MS as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.2. Alternate No. 2: Furnish and install an E-Layer type shock pad system over the entire surface of the synthetic turf field at Hudson Bend MS as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.3. Alternate No. 3: Furnish and install an E-Layer type shock pad system over the entire surface of the synthetic turf field at Lake Travis HS Track as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.4. Alternate No. 4: For the synthetic turf field at Lake Travis MS, provide to Owner upon completion of the work, a 4-year field maintenance service agreement as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.5. Alternate No. 5: For the synthetic turf field at Hudson Bend MS, provide to Owner upon completion of the work, a 4- year field maintenance service agreement as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.6. Alternate No. 6: For the synthetic turf field at Lake Travis HS Track, provide to Owner upon completion of the work, a 4-year field maintenance service agreement as indicated in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] 11

4 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects 2018 Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP) Number Alternate No. 7: Furnish and install Mondo track surfacing over the existing concrete surface around the entire perimeter of the field at Lake Travis HS Football Stadium, as indicated on the drawings. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 1.8. Alternate No. 8: Furnish and install (4) 25 second clocks at Lake Travis MS and Hudson Bend MS and safety pad for the North clock at Lake Travis MS as indicated on the drawings and in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount Dollars $ 1.9. Alternate No. 9: Furnish and install safety pads for the goal post of all three sites, as indicated on the drawings and in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ Alternate No. 10: Furnish and install the steeplechase water jump pit at Lake Travis HS as indicated on the drawings and in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ Alternate No. 11: Furnish and install the long jump pit covers at Hudson Bend MS at as indicated on the drawings and in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ Alternate No. 12: Remove and replace all asphalt surfacing over the entire 400-meter track at Lake Travis HS as indicated on the drawings and in the specifications. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ Alternate No. 13: Install centerfield logo at Lake Travis HS as indicated on the drawings. [Fill in blank with appropriate written amount] Dollars $ 2. Unit Prices. Proposer to provide add or deduct unit prices for the following items. Proposer to indicate if price is an add or deduct. Item Description Unit of Measure Price 2.1 Saw-cutting, removing and properly disposing of existing asphalt surfacing and underlying base material and installing in the same place, 8 minimum thickness new aggregate base material and 2 minimum Sq Yd $ thickness new asphalt surface including compaction of both materials. 2.2 Construction of 6 x 12 concrete curbing with two number 4 rebar spaced evenly. Linear Ft $

5 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects 2018 Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP) Number Acknowledgement of addenda received, if applicable, and included in Proposal Amounts (Proposer to write in the Addendum number): 3. Business History and Experience The Proposer shall provide the following information concerning companies business history and experience as follows: a. Number of years providing commercial construction services based on the scope and size of the project indicated within this RFCSP. Total 10 points. Years b. Percentage of work to be self-performed. Total 10 points % c. Resumes. Proposed Job Superintendent and Project Manager for this project. Resumes should be attached for the key individuals with emphasis on job knowledge and experience. Total 15 points. Provided? d.1 Project Experience. List all projects Proposer currently has under contract. Listing shall include: Total 15 points. Name of Project Delivery Method Contract amount Owner s name; Owner s contact; Owner s phone number; Owner s address Architect / Engineer s name; Architect s contact; Architect s phone number Project start date Percent complete Scheduled completion date d.2 List the major educational projects that Proposer has completed in the past five years with an overall construction cost greater than $1,000,000 and within Central Texas. Listing shall include: Name of project Delivery method Contract amount Dollar amount of change orders Owner s name; Owner s contact; Owner s Phone number; Owner s address Architect / Engineer s name; Architect s contact; Architect s phone number Project start date Percent complete Scheduled completion date Additional Documentation. This information will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis only. No points will be assigned. Proposer shall initial each item to indicate acceptance or that the information was provided. Initial 4. Project Schedule. The Proposer shall read and acknowledge the construction start and substantial completion date indicated in Section III, Item 3. Failure to acknowledge or adjust the dates may disqualify the Proposal. 5. Safety. The Proposer shall provide a statement of firm s safety record and/or history.

6 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Lake Travis ISD Turf and Track Projects 2018 Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP) Number Claims and suits. The Proposer shall provide the following information under separate cover: Are there any judgments, claims, arbitration proceedings or suits, pending or outstanding against your organization or its officers? If yes, please include details. Has your organization filed or been involved in any lawsuits or requested arbitration with regard to construction contracts within the last five years? Within the last five years, has any officer or principal of your organization ever been an officer or principal of another organization when it failed to complete a construction contract? If the answer is yes, please include details as to why the contract was not completed. Within the last five years, has any worker s compensation claims been filed by any workers on any job sites managed by your organization? If yes, please provide details of the incident and the outcome of the claim. 7. Value Engineered Item (VEI). Based on the plans and specifications of this RFCSP, the Proposer may provide Value Engineered Items (VEI) they feel would be a benefit to the District. VEIs should be provided in a separate document attached to the Proposal response. Proposal shall include how the items will affect the overall plan and provide an estimated cost. The plans and specifications provided shall be considered the base bid

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16 SITE DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: AM Drawn by: AM Checked by: BSM Approved by: BSM Project No Scale: N.T.S. File Name: Date: Aug 9, Industrial Oaks Blvd, St 160 Austin, Texas PH. (512) FAX. (512) SITE LOCATION PLAN Bee Creek Middle School 4918 Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas Exhibit A-1A

17 SITE Project Manager: Project No. AM Drawn by: AM Checked by: N.T.S. File Name: BSM DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SITE AERIAL PLAN Scale: Approved by: Industrial Oaks Blvd, St 160 Date: BSM Aug 9, 2012 PH. (512) Austin, Texas FAX. (512) Bee Creek Middle School 4918 Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas Exhibit A-1B

18 A-16 D-20 A-14 A-15 P-25 P-24 D-21 P-27 P-26 A-17 B-1 B-2 B-4 B-5 B-3 B-7 B-6 B-9 P-30 Boring Locations Omitted Boring Location D-22 B-8 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 P-28 P-29 T-18 D-23 T-19 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager: AM Drawn by: AM Checked by: BSM Approved by: BSM Project No Scale: N.T.S. File Name: Date: Aug 9, Industrial Oaks Blvd, St 160 Austin, Texas PH. (512) FAX. (512) BORING LOCATION PLAN Bee Creek Middle School 4918 Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas Exhibit A-2

19 PROJECT: Bee Creek Middle School BORING LOG NO. A-16 CLIENT: Lake Travis ISD Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas See Exhibit A-2 DEPTH LEAN CLAY (CL) Very stiff, tan, with limestone fragments 2.0 LIMESTONE (Glen Rose Group) Tan, severely weathered to weathered, with clay seams/layers and solution activity DEPTH (ft) 5 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS 4.0 tsf (HP) 50/2" N=50/2" RECOVERY (%) RQD (%) STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) 8 DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI Percent Fines THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TERRACON SMART LOG-NO WELL BORING LOGS.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 8/20/ Boring Terminated at 15 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 4 feet; Wet Rotary 4 to 15 feet Abandonment Method: Borings backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd., Suite 160 Austin, Texas Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: 7/13/2012 Drill Rig: CME 75 Project No.: Boring Completed: 7/13/2012 Driller: Core Tech Drilling, Inc. Exhibit A-18

20 PROJECT: Bee Creek Middle School BORING LOG NO. A-17 CLIENT: Lake Travis ISD Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas See Exhibit A-2 DEPTH FAT CLAY (CH) Very stiff, brown 2.0 LIMESTONE (Glen Rose Group) Tan, weathered, with clay seams and layers -with solution activity to 12 feet DEPTH (ft) 5 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS 4.0 tsf (HP) 50/1½ N=50/1½ RECOVERY (%) RQD (%) STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) 3 DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI Percent Fines 48 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TERRACON SMART LOG-NO WELL BORING LOGS.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 8/20/ clay layer from 17 to 18 feet Boring Terminated at 20 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 3 feet; Wet Rotary 3 to 15 feet Abandonment Method: Borings backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd., Suite 160 Austin, Texas Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: 7/13/2012 Drill Rig: CME 75 Project No.: Boring Completed: 7/13/2012 Driller: Core Tech Drilling, Inc. Exhibit A-19

21 PROJECT: Bee Creek Middle School BORING LOG NO. D-21 CLIENT: Lake Travis ISD Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TERRACON SMART LOG-NO WELL BORING LOGS.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 8/20/12 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION DEPTH FAT CLAY (CH) Hard, dark brown 2.0 LIMESTONE (Glen Rose Group) Tan, weathered, with clay seams 15.0 Bee Creek Road Travis County, Texas See Exhibit A-2 -severely weathered, with numerous clay layers from 5 to 10 feet Boring Terminated at 15 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 2 feet; Wet Rotary 2 to 15 feet Abandonment Method: Borings backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed DEPTH (ft) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd., Suite 160 Austin, Texas RECOVERY (%) RQD (%) 4.5 tsf (HP) Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: 7/16/2012 Drill Rig: CME 75 Project No.: STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) 3 Exhibit DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) 144 ATTERBERG LIMITS Boring Completed: 7/16/2012 Driller: Core Tech Drilling, Inc. A-23 LL-PL-PI Percent Fines

22 PROJECT SITE DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Mgr: AM Drawn By: AM Checked By: BSM Approved By: BSM Project No Scale: N.T.S File Name: SITE PLAN Date: 3/1/ Industrial Oaks Blvd, Suite 160, Austin, Texas PH. {512} FAX. {512} SITE AERIAL AND LOCATION PLAN Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, Texas EXHIBIT A-1

23 B-2 B-3 B-1 B-4 B-5 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Boring Locations Project Mgr: AM Drawn By: AM Checked By: BSM Approved By: BSM Project No Scale: N.T.S File Name: SITE PLAN Date: 3/1/ Industrial Oaks Blvd, Suite 160, Austin, Texas PH. {512} FAX. {512} BORING LOCATION PLAN Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, Texas EXHIBIT A-2

24 PROJECT: Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf BORING LOG NO. B-1 Lake Travis ISD CLIENT: Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, TX LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: Longitude: Approximate Surface Elev: 1114 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) CLAYEY SAND (SC) Medium dense to dense, tan to light brown, with limestone fragments DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS N=16 STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI PERCENT FINES 48 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL LAKE TRAVIS HIGH.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 3/2/ LIMESTONE Tan, with clay seams Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 5 feet Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed 1110+/ /- 5 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd Ste 160 Austin, TX N=42 50/2" Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: Drill Rig: Geoprobe Project No.: Boring Completed: Driller: Total Support Service, Inc. Exhibit: A-3

25 PROJECT: Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf BORING LOG NO. B-2 Lake Travis ISD CLIENT: Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, TX LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: Longitude: Approximate Surface Elev: 1114 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND (GC) Medium dense to dense, tan to light brown, with limestone fragments DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS N=12 STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL LAKE TRAVIS HIGH.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 3/2/ LIMESTONE Tan, with clay seams Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 5 feet Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed 1110+/ /- 5 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd Ste 160 Austin, TX N=33 50/1" Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: Drill Rig: Geoprobe Project No.: Boring Completed: Driller: Total Support Service, Inc. Exhibit: A-4

26 PROJECT: Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf BORING LOG NO. B-3 Lake Travis ISD CLIENT: Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, TX LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: Longitude: Approximate Surface Elev: 1114 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) CLAYEY SAND (SC) Medium dense to very dense, tan to light brown, with limestone fragments DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS N=22 STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL LAKE TRAVIS HIGH.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 3/2/ LIMESTONE Tan, with clay seams Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 5 feet Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed / /- 5 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd Ste 160 Austin, TX N= /1" Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: Drill Rig: Geoprobe Project No.: Boring Completed: Driller: Total Support Service, Inc. Exhibit: A-5

27 PROJECT: Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf BORING LOG NO. B-4 Lake Travis ISD CLIENT: Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, TX LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: Longitude: Approximate Surface Elev: 1113 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) CLAYEY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SC) Medium dense to very dense, tan to light brown, with limestone fragments DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS N=22 STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI PERCENT FINES 48 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL LAKE TRAVIS HIGH.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 3/2/ LIMESTONE Tan, weathered, with clay seams Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 5 feet Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed 1109+/ /- 5 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd Ste 160 Austin, TX N=60 50/5" Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: Drill Rig: Geoprobe Project No.: Boring Completed: Driller: Total Support Service, Inc. Exhibit: A-6

28 PROJECT: Lake Travis High School Soccer Field Turf BORING LOG NO. B-5 Lake Travis ISD CLIENT: Austin, TX Page 1 of 1 SITE: GRAPHIC LOG 3324 Ranch Road 620 S Austin, TX LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: Longitude: Approximate Surface Elev: 1112 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND (GC) Medium dense to very dense, tan to light brown, with limestone fragments DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS N=24 STRENGTH TEST TEST TYPE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (tsf) STRAIN (%) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL LAKE TRAVIS HIGH.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 3/2/ LIMESTONE Tan, with clay seams Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. Advancement Method: Dry Augered 0 to 5 feet Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS No free water observed 1108+/ /- 5 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations Industrial Oaks Blvd Ste 160 Austin, TX N=70 50/1" Hammer Type: Automatic Notes: Boring Started: Drill Rig: Geoprobe Project No.: Boring Completed: Driller: Total Support Service, Inc. Exhibit: A-7

29 APPENDIX B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

30 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES Water Initially Encountered Water Level After a Specified Period of Time N (HP) Standard Penetration Test Resistance (Blows/Ft.) Hand Penetrometer SAMPLING Split Spoon WATER LEVEL Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water levels indicated on the soil boring logs are the levels measured in the borehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur over time. In low permeability soils, accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. FIELD TESTS (T) (DCP) (PID) (OVA) Torvane Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Photo-Ionization Detector Organic Vapor Analyzer DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, field visual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance STRENGTH TERMS Descriptive Term (Density) Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Very Loose 0-3 Loose Medium Dense Dense Descriptive Term (Consistency) Unconfined Compressive Strength Qu, (tsf) Very Soft less than Soft Medium Stiff Stiff 0.25 to to to 2.00 Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft Very Dense > 50 Very Stiff 2.00 to Hard > 4.00 > 30 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Trace With Modifier RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Trace With Modifier Percent of Dry Weight < > 30 Percent of Dry Weight < > 12 Major Component of Sample Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay Term Non-plastic Low Medium High GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Particle Size Over 12 in. (300 mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Plasticity Index > 30 Exhibit: B-1

31 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Coarse Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Gravels: More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Sands: 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Clean Gravels: Less than 5% fines C Gravels with Fines: More than 12% fines C Clean Sands: Less than 5% fines D Sands with Fines: More than 12% fines D Inorganic: Organic: Inorganic: Organic: Group Symbol Soil Classification Group Name B Cu 4 and 1 Cc 3 E GW Well-graded gravel F Cu 4 and/or 1 Cc 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F,G,H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F,G,H Cu 6 and 1 Cc 3 E SW Well-graded sand I Cu 6 and/or 1 Cc 3 E SP Poorly graded sand I Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G,H,I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G,H,I PI 7 and plots on or above A line J CL Lean clay K,L,M PI 4 or plots below A line J ML Silt K,L,M Liquid limit - oven dried Organic clay K,L,M,N 0.75 OL Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K,L,M,O PI plots on or above A line CH Fat clay K,L,M PI plots below A line MH Elastic Silt K,L,M Liquid limit - oven dried Liquid limit - not dried Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat 0.75 OH Organic clay K,L,M,P Organic silt K,L,M,Q A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add with cobbles or boulders, or both to group name. C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay E Cu = D 60/D 10 Cc = D (D ) 2 x D 60 F If soil contains 15% sand, add with sand to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add with organic fines to group name. I If soil contains 15% gravel, add with gravel to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add with sand or with gravel, whichever is predominant. L If soil contains 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add sandy to group name. M If soil contains 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add gravelly to group name. N PI 4 and plots on or above A line. O PI 4 or plots below A line. P PI plots on or above A line. Q PI plots below A line. Exhibit B-2

32 DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES Term Unweathered Slightly weathered Moderately weathered Highly weathered Completely weathered Residual soil WEATHERING Description No visible sign of rock material weathering, perhaps slight discoloration on major discontinuity surfaces. Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material may be discolored by weathering and may be somewhat weaker externally than in its fresh condition. Less than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present either as a continuous framework or as corestones. More than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present either as a discontinuous framework or as corestones. All rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure is still largely intact. All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and material fabric are destroyed. There is a large change in volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported. STRENGTH OR HARDNESS Description Field Identification Uniaxial Compressive Strength, PSI (MPa) Extremely weak Indented by thumbnail (0.3-1) Very weak Crumbles under firm blows with point of geological hammer, can be peeled by a pocket knife (1-5) Weak rock Can be peeled by a pocket knife with difficulty, shallow indentations made by firm blow with point of geological hammer 700-4,000 (5-30) Medium strong Cannot be scraped or peeled with a pocket knife, specimen can be fractured with single firm blow of geological hammer 4,000-7,000 (30-50) Strong rock Specimen requires more than one blow of geological hammer to fracture it 7,000-15,000 (50-100) Very strong Specimen requires many blows of geological hammer to fracture it 15,000-36,000 ( ) Extremely strong Specimen can only be chipped with geological hammer >36,000 (>250) DISCONTINUITY DESCRIPTION Fracture Spacing (Joints, Faults, Other Fractures) Bedding Spacing (May Include Foliation or Banding) Description Spacing Description Spacing Extremely close < ¾ in (<19 mm) Laminated < ½ in (<12 mm) Very close ¾ in 2-1/2 in (19-60 mm) Very thin ½ in 2 in (12 50 mm) Close 2-1/2 in 8 in ( mm) Thin 2 in 1 ft ( mm) Moderate 8 in 2 ft ( mm) Medium 1 ft 3 ft ( mm) Wide 2 ft 6 ft (600 mm 2.0 m) Thick 3 ft 10 ft (900 mm 3 m) Very Wide 6 ft 20 ft (2.0 6 m) Massive > 10 ft (3 m) Discontinuity Orientation (Angle): Measure the angle of discontinuity relative to a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the core. (For most cases, the core axis is vertical; therefore, the plane perpendicular to the core axis is horizontal.) For example, a horizontal bedding plane would have a 0 degree angle. ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION (RQD*) Description RQD Value (%) Very Poor 0-25 Poor Fair Good Excellent *The combined length of all sound and intact core segments equal to or greater than 4 inches in length, expressed as a percentage of the total core run length. Reference: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Publication No FHWA-NHI , December 2009 Technical Manual for Design and Construction of Road Tunnels Civil Elements Exhibit B-3