AHERA/NESHAP ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT

Transcription

1 AHERA/NESHAP ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT: Lynwood Givens City of Florence Purchasing Agent 324 West Evans Street Florence, SC (843) LOCATION: 406 Railroad Ave Florence, SC DATE OF INSPECTION: September 7, 2017 DATE OF REPORT: October 9, 2017 PREPARED BY: Michael D. Zavislak, NRCC-EAC, CHMM, CIH, PE (NC) & Robert Smith SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C. (SUMMIT) 3575 Centre Circle Fort Mill, SC SUMMIT Job No

2 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, 2017 AHERA/NESHAP ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT 406 Railroad Ave Florence, SC TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS... i LIST OF APPENDICES... i 1.0 REPORT CERTIFICATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUSPECT MATERIALS Flooring Tile Roofing Caulking Window Glazing Plaster Ceiling Texture Drywall/Joint Chimney Mastic Sheet Flooring Flooring Mastic CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 5 FIGURES 1.0 Site Location Map LIST OF APPENDICES A Analytical Results B Asbestos Inspector s License C SUMMIT Documentation i

3 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, REPORT CERTIFICATION SUMMIT is pleased to provide environmental consulting services for City of Florence. Please contact this office at with any questions or comments regarding the findings submitted in this report. This document, entitled AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection Report, was prepared for City of Florence and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) with sound practices and procedures and in accordance with Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), Title II of the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), SCDHEC Regulation , 40 CFR 61, and 40 CFR 763 for Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) guidance. The results obtained by the work documented in this report fulfill the requirements of federal, state, and local regulations regarding Asbestos Containing Materials. 10/9/2017 Michael D. Zavislak, NRCC-EAC, CHMM, PE (NC) Date SC DHEC AHERA Asbestos Inspector No. BI Expiration Date: November 4, 2017 SC DHEC AHERA Asbestos Management Planner No. MP SC DHEC AHERA Asbestos Project Designer No. PD SC DHEC AHERA Asbestos Air Sampler No. AS SC DHEC AHERA Asbestos Supervisor No. SA O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc 1

4 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On September 7, 2017, SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C. (SUMMIT) performed an AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection for City of Florence located at 406 Railroad Ave, Florence, SC. The purpose of this inspection was to investigate available records for the specification of asbestos containing material (ACM), inspect for suspect materials, sample and analyze suspect materials to test for asbestos, and assess the condition and location of the ACM and other characteristics of the structure. A homogeneous material is a material that appears to be uniform when properties such as age, color, and texture are compared. Ten (10) homogeneous areas were sampled. The homogeneous areas are described in detail in section 3.0 of this report. SF-1-1, 2, 3 The blue/white sheet flooring located in the dining room and hallway appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The flooring contains 15% Chrysotile asbestos and there is approximately 120 square feet of this material. All Layers shall be treated as ACM. SF-2-1, 2, 3 The orange/brown sheet flooring located in the bath appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The flooring contains 15% Chrysotile asbestos and there is approximately 40 square feet of this material. All Layers shall be treated as ACM. C Tar-1, 2, 3 The chimney mastic appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The chimney mastic contains 5% Chrysotile asbestos and there is approximately 10 square feet of this material. O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc 2

5 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, SUSPECT MATERIALS 3.1 Flooring Tile The flooring appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.2 Roofing The roofing appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.3 Caulking The caulking appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.4 Window Glazing The window glazing appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.5 Plaster The plaster appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is friable and is classified as a surfacing material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc 3

6 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, Ceiling Texture The ceiling texture appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is friable and is classified as a surfacing material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.7 Drywall/Joint compound The drywall and joint compound appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is friable and is classified as a surfacing material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.8 Chimney Mastic The chimney mastic appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The chimney mastic contains 5% Chrysotile asbestos and there is approximately 10 square feet of this material. The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. 3.9 Sheet Flooring The orange/brown sheet flooring located in the bath and blue/white sheet flooring in dining room and hallway appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The flooring contains 15% Chrysotile asbestos and there is approximately 40 and 120 square feet of this material. The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation Flooring Mastic associated with floor tiles The flooring mastic appears to be in damaged condition with a low potential for damage. The material is non-friable and is classified as a miscellaneous material. The material was sampled and the results indicated that the material is not classified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). The sample analysis of the material is enclosed in Appendix A. A detailed map showing the locations of the sampling locations can be found in the SUMMIT Documentation. O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc 4

7 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On September 7, 2017, SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C. (SUMMIT) performed a AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection for 406 Railroad Ave, Florence, SC. SUSPECT MATERIAL ACM (Y/N) FRIABLE (Y/N) AMOUNT (Square feet) Flooring Tile N N 300 Roofing N N 1,200 Caulking N N 13 windows, 3 doors and 5 pillars Window Glazing N Y 13 windows Plaster N Y 1,500 Ceiling Texture N Y 840 Drywall/Joint N Y 1,400 Chimney Mastic Y N 10 Sheet Flooring Y N 160 Associate Floor Tile Mastic N N 300 If the structure is to be renovated or demolished, a copy of this report and a notification of demolition or renovation forms must be submitted to The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) at least ten working days prior to these activities taking place. Bidders are responsible for their own calculations and estimates of quantities. Actual quantities may be more or less than indicated. Though every effort was made to examine wall cavities and other areas for pipe insulation, spray-applied or trowel applied miscellaneous material or other miscellaneous materials and other Presumed Asbestos Containing Material (PACM), this survey and report only deals with accessible areas of the building. There may be additional inaccessible areas above ceiling, behind walls and below floors that become evident during demolition or renovation activities. If suspect materials are found, additional asbestos testing may be required. O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc 5

8 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, 2017 FIGURES O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Asbestos Inspection.doc

9 Figure 1 Site Location Map 406 Railroad Ave Florence, SC SUMMIT ELT, PC Project: O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\R - Figure 1 Site Map.doc

10 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, 2017 APPENDIX A ANALYTICAL RESULTS O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\Appendix A.rtf

11 Asbestos Laboratory Report Prepared for SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C. Project: 406 Railroad Ave Summit #: Date Analyzed: 9/22/2017 Date Reported: 9/22/2017 Total Samples Analyzed: 47 # Samples >1% Asbestos: 3 Method of Analysis: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 Page 1 of 6

12 Summit Laboratories 3575 Centre Circle, Fort Mill, SC Phone: (704) Summit Order: SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C Centre Circle Drive Fort Mill, SC Date Received: 9/15/2017 Date Analyzed: 9/22/2017 Date Reported: 9/22/2017 Project : 406 Railroad Ave Asbestos Sample ID Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos Ext Clk-1 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Ext Clk FT 1-1-White Floor Tile FT 1-1-Mastic A FT 1-1-Gray Floor Tile B FT 1-1-Mastic C FT 1-2-White Floor Tile FT 1-2-Mastic A FT 1-2-Gray Floor Tile B FT 1-2-Mastic C Glz Cmpnd Glz Cmpnd SF 1-1-Blue Flooring SF Exterior Caulk Exterior Caulk 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile 12x12 Floor Tile Glazing Compound Glazing Compound Sheet Flooring Sheet Flooring White,Gray White,Gray White,Gray,Green Tan Gray Tan White,Gray,Green Tan Gray,Green Tan Gray,Tan Gray,Tan Blue,White Fibrous Non-Asbestos 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 5% Cellulose 80% 15% Chrysotile Positive Stop (not analyzed) Analyst(s): Chris Estes Page 2 of 6

13 Summit Laboratories 3575 Centre Circle, Fort Mill, SC Phone: (704) Summit Order: SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C Centre Circle Drive Fort Mill, SC Date Received: 9/15/2017 Date Analyzed: 9/22/2017 Date Reported: 9/22/2017 Project : 406 Railroad Ave Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample ID Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos SF FT FT FT 3-1-Floor Tile FT 3-1-Mastic A FT 3-2-Floor Tile FT 3-2-Mastic A FT 4-1-Floor Tile FT 4-1-Mastic A FT 4-2-Floor Tile FT 4-2-Mastic A Plstr Plstr Plstr Sheet Flooring 12x12 Pink Floor Tile Pink 12x12 Pink Floor Tile Pink 12x12 Gray Floor Tile Gray 12x12 Gray Floor Tile Tan 12x12 Gray Floor Tile Gray 12x12 Gray Floor Tile Tan 12x12 White Floor Tile White,Gray 12x12 White Floor Tile Tan 12x12 White Floor Tile White,Gray 12x12 White Floor Tile Tan Plaster Tan Plaster Tan Plaster Tan 100% 100% 100% <1% Celllulose 100% 100% <1% Celllulose 100% 100% <1% Celllulose 100% 100% <1% Celllulose 100% <1% Celllulose 100% <1% Celllulose 100% <1% Celllulose 100% Positive Stop (not analyzed) Analyst(s): Chris Estes Page 3 of 6

14 Summit Laboratories 3575 Centre Circle, Fort Mill, SC Phone: (704) Summit Order: SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C Centre Circle Drive Fort Mill, SC Date Received: 9/15/2017 Date Analyzed: 9/22/2017 Date Reported: 9/22/2017 Project : 406 Railroad Ave Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample ID Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos Plstr Plstr C Tex C Tex C Tex DW-1-Drywall DW-1-Joint Compound A DW-2-Drywall DW-2-Joint Compound A DW-3-Drywall DW-3-Joint Compound A DW-4-Drywall DW-4-Joint Compound A DW-5-Drywall Plaster Plaster Blown Ceiling Texture Blown Ceiling Texture Blown Ceiling Texture Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Drywall & Joint Compound Tan Tan White,Tan White,Tan White,Tan Gray,Brown Fibrous White,Tan Gray,Brown Fibrous White,Tan Gray,Brown Fibrous White,Tan Gray,Brown Fibrous White,Tan Gray,Brown Fibrous <1% Celllulose 100% <1% Celllulose 100% 100% 100% 100% 10% Cellulose 90% 100% 10% Cellulose 90% 100% 10% Cellulose 90% 100% 10% Cellulose 90% 100% 10% Cellulose 90% Analyst(s): Chris Estes Page 4 of 6

15 Summit Laboratories 3575 Centre Circle, Fort Mill, SC Phone: (704) Summit Order: SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing, P.C Centre Circle Drive Fort Mill, SC Date Received: 9/15/2017 Date Analyzed: 9/22/2017 Date Reported: 9/22/2017 Project : 406 Railroad Ave Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample ID Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos DW-5-Joint Compound A C Tar C Tar C Tar Roof-1-Shingle Roof-1-Felt A Roof-2-Shingle Roof-2-Felt A SF 2-1-Orange Flooring SF SF Drywall & Joint Compound Chimney Tar Chimney Tar Chimney Tar Asphalt Shingle Asphalt Shingle Asphalt Shingle Asphalt Shingle Sheet Flooring Sheet Flooring Sheet Flooring White,Tan Black Fibrous Black,Brown Fibrous Black Fibrous Black,Brown Fibrous Black Fibrous Orange,Brown Fibrous 100% 3% Cellulose 92% 5% Glass 95% 50% Cellulose 50% 5% Glass 95% 50% Cellulose 50% 5% Cellulose 80% 5% Chrysotile Positive Stop (not analyzed) Positive Stop (not analyzed) 15% Chrysotile Positive Stop (not analyzed) Positive Stop (not analyzed) Analyst(s): Chris Estes Page 5 of 6

16 METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 For samples easily separated into homogeneous layers, each component will be analyzed separately. The sample may not be representative of the larger material in question. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 Method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such as vinyl floor tiles, mastic and roofing can be difficult to analyze by PLM. Reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or None Detect for these materials is recommended. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from Summit Laboratories. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. Analyst(s): Chris Estes Approved By: Michael Zavislak, Approved Signatory NVLAP Lab Code Summit Laboratories, 3575 Centre Circle, Fort Mill, SC 29715, Phone: (704) Page 6 of 6 This is the last page of the report

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, 2017 APPENDIX B INSPECTOR S LICENSES O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\Appendix B.rtf

27 SGDHEltrTSSUED Asbestos ld Card Michael Zavislak CONSULTPD PD.OOO92 AIRSAMPLER AS.O0296 SUPERAHERA SA-OI5'I5 GONSULTIIP MP.OO.I04 consultbt Bl E\piration Date,l,llo4l,l7 11t03t17 1,uou,t7,l,llo2l,l7 1,,1o2r,7

28 AHERA/NESHAP Asbestos Inspection SUMMIT Project No Railroad Ave, Florence, South Carolina October 9, 2017 APPENDIX C SUMMIT DOCUMENTATION O:\ Jobs---\ City of Florence\ Railroad Avenue\4. ENVIRONMENTAL\Inspection\Appendix C.rtf

29 Ext Clk 2 Plstr 1 Plstr 5 FT2 3 Glz Cmpnd 1 C Tex 2 FT2 1-2 FT SF1 1-2 C Tex 3 FT C Tex 1 FT SF1 3 DW1-2-3 Front Ext Clk 3 Plstr 4 Glz Cmpnd 2-3 SF Ext Clk 1 Plstr 2 Plstr 3 Porch C Tar1-2-3 Drawing by Summit ELT Not to Scale Sample Locations 406 Railroad Avenue Florence, South Carolina September 9, 2017

30