Refurbishment and Demolition Survey of 543 Gorgie Road, Edinburgh EH11 3AR

Transcription

1 0337 Refurbishment and Demolition Survey of, Edinburgh EH11 3AR Project No: G Date: < >14/09/2016 Client Contact: James Warren Address: Kinetic Demolition Midlothian Innovation Centre Pentlandfield Roslin EH25 9RE Tel: PO Number: James Warren Exova (UK) Limited, 70 Montrose Avenue, Hillington, Glasgow G52 4LA

2 Authorisations This Asbestos Survey Report has been checked and authorised by: Signature Date 27 th September 2016 Revision : Final (1a) - Issue N 12 dated February 2010 This report is not to be used for contractual purposes unless the signed cover sheet where indicated by both the surveyor and the technical reviewer and the report is designated Final on the signatory sheet. This report must be read in its entirety, including any appendices. Exova (UK) Limited accepts no responsibility for sub-division of this report. During the desk top review the following historical asbestos documentation was made available, and should be read in conjunction with Exova (UK) Limited report. Documented Asbestos Related Project Information Date Revision Document Reference Number Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 2 of 64

3 CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Asbestos Materials Identified 1.2 Limitations on Access 2.0 Introduction and Scope of Works 3.0 Contract Review 4.0 Survey Types 5.0 Survey Results 6.0 Asbestos Management 7.0 Bulk Sampling and Analysis 8.0 Conclusions 9.0 Recommendations APPENDICES Appendix I - Asbestos Register Appendix II - Survey Data Sheets Appendix III - Site Location Plans Appendix IV - Non Asbestos Register Appendix V - Bulk Analysis Certificate Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 3 of 64

4 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exova (UK) Limited received an enquiry from Kinetic Demolition to perform an Asbestos Refurbishment and Demolition Survey at, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR. The client requested a demolition survey of the buildings at the South East corner of the site. The following sections summarise the locations where asbestos has been identified and any locations that were inaccessible during the survey works. 1.1 ASBESTOS MATERIALS IDENTIFIED High Risk Building Floor Area Location Material Recommendations Action date No items found. Medium Risk Building Floor Area Location Material Recommendations Action date 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Remove 14/12/ (Ground Floor) 005 Office Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Remove 14/12/ (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Remove 14/12/2016 Low Risk Building Floor Area Location Material Recommendations Action date 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Ceiling/external roof - Asbestos cement Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Bitumen felt in gutter - Bitumen Remove 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 4 of 64

5 Low Risk Building Floor Area Location Material Recommendations Action date 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 007 Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Ceiling - debris behind wire mesh - Asbestos cement Remove 14/09/ (Ground Floor) 026 Externals Roof of room Asbestos cement Remove 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 5 of 64

6 1.2 LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS During the course of the survey, every effort was made to gain access to all areas within the agreed scope of the survey. However, for the purpose of this Asbestos Survey Report, where it has not been possible to gain suitable and sufficient access, these areas have been identified in the table below Until such time as no/limited access areas can be inspected and suspect materials analysed by competent persons, these areas should be regarded, in accordance with HSG 264, as containing presumed asbestos materials and appropriate management procedures should be implemented. On the first occasion access is gained to these areas it is recommended that Exova (UK) Limited completes the Asbestos Survey. No access areas: Building Floor Area Location Reason for No Access with justification Photo 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer - Wall 2 - electrics - Not accessed Live 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 004 Cupboard - Safe - Not accessed Locked Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 6 of 64

7 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office - Ceiling Void - Not accessed Not accessed due to suspected ACM being sampled 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse - Wall 1 - electrics - Not accessed Live 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation - Wall 4 - electrics - Not accessed Live Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 7 of 64

8 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Stairwell - Electrics on brick column - Not accessed Live 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse - Wall 1 - heater - Not accessed Live 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse - Wall 11 - electrics - Not accessed Live Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 8 of 64

9 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse - Walls 6 & 7 - electrics - Not accessed Live 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 026 Externals - Elevation 08 - Not accessed Access is via private property Limited access areas: Building Floor Area Location Reason for No Access with justification Photo No limited access items Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 9 of 64

10 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORKS 2.1 Exova (UK) Limited received an enquiry from Kinetic Demolition to perform an Asbestos Refurbishment and Demolition Survey at, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR. The client requested a demolition survey of the buildings at the South East corner of the site. 2.2 The Asbestos Survey was conducted on 14/09/2016 by David Cook, Lawrie Ciano of Exova (UK) Limited. 2.3 Exova s standard Terms & Conditions apply to this project, a copy of which is available on our website To ensure the Health & Safety of Exova (UK) Limited and site staff, and in order to comply with the requirements of HSG 264 Asbestos: The survey guide, a Risk Assessment was compiled and included in the report. 2.5 It should be noted that the Asbestos Survey Report is not intended to be used as a Bill of Quantities for the removal of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) identified at the site and should be used as a reference document only when tendering. All quantities detailed within the Asbestos Survey Report are approximations and should be verified by a competent person. It is our advice that documentation submitted to licensed Asbestos Removal Contractors for the purpose of tendering works be accompanied by an appropriate Technical Specification and separate Bill of Quantities prepared by a suitably qualified person. All Tender returns should be reviewed by an independent and suitably competent person and should also include a risk contingency for site specific unforeseen circumstances. 2.6 This report should not be reproduced other than in full, without the written approval of Exova (UK) Limited. Unless stated otherwise, surveying will have been conducted to the version of any specification quoted, current at the date of inspection 2.7 Where further materials are identified as part of any works that do not appear to be detailed within the survey report then these materials should be treated with caution and presumed to contain asbestos until sampled and analysed. 2.8 No electrical equipment will be surveyed due to the high possibility of personal injury if the equipment is live. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 10 of 64

11 3.0 CONTRACT REVIEW & SURVEY PLANNING 3.1 As part of the survey planning and in order to comply with HSG 264, Exova (UK) Limited completed a Contract Review. This document identifies the agreed scope of works undertaken. The following information was requested from the Client: Records of asbestos materials. Records of abatement works. Records of surveys/sampling carried out. Records of Health and Safety files prepared to comply with Construction, Design and Management. Copies of as built and available plans. 3.2 The information gained from the Contract Review was utilised in formulating the Survey Strategy. 3.3 Details provided were reviewed and, where validated, have been relied upon in the formulation of the Survey Data. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 11 of 64

12 4.0 SURVEY TYPES 4.1 This section describes two different types of asbestos surveys as detailed in HSG 264: management surveys and refurbishment and demolition surveys. 4.1 The type of survey will vary during the lifespan of the premises and several may be needed over time. A management survey will be required during the normal occupation and use of the building to ensure continued management of the ACMs in situ. A refurbishment or demolition survey will be necessary when the building (or part of it) is to be upgraded, refurbished or demolished. It is probable that at larger premises a mixture of survey types will be appropriate, eg a boiler house due for demolition will require a refurbishment/demolition survey, while offices at the same site would have a management survey. In later years refurbishment surveys may be required in rooms or floors which are being upgraded. In sectors where there are large numbers of properties (eg domestic houses) or internal units (eg hotels), only particular rooms may be specified for upgrading, eg kitchens, bathrooms and bedrooms. Refurbishment surveys would only be necessary in these locations. 4.2 It is important that the client and the surveyor know exactly what type of survey is to be carried out and where, and what the specification will be. So there should be a clear statement and record of the type of survey that is to be carried out, including the reasons for selecting that type of survey, and where it is to be carried out. 4.3 Management survey - A management survey is the standard survey. Its purpose is to locate and describe, as far as reasonably practicable, the presence and extent of any suspect ACMs in the building which could be damaged or disturbed during normal occupancy, including foreseeable maintenance and installation, and to assess their condition. 4.4 Management surveys will often involve minor intrusive work and some disturbance. A management survey should include an assessment of the condition of the various ACMs and their ability to release fibres into the air, if they are disturbed in some way. 4.5 The survey will usually involve sampling and analysis to confirm the presence or absence of ACMs. However a management survey can also involve presuming the presence or absence of asbestos. A management survey can be completed using a combination of sampling ACMs and presuming ACMs or, indeed, just presuming. Any materials presumed to contain asbestos must also have their condition assessed (i.e. a material assessment). Surveyors should always endeavour to positively identify ACMs. When sampling is carried out as part of a management survey, samples from each type of ACM should be collected and analysed. If the material is found to contain asbestos, other similar materials used in the same way in the building can be strongly presumed to contain asbestos. 4.6 All areas should be accessed and inspected as far as is reasonably practicable. Areas should include underfloor coverings, above false ceilings, and inside risers, service ducts, lift shafts etc. Surveying may also include some minor intrusive works, such as accessing behind fascia and panels and other surfaces. The extent of intrusion shall depend on the degree of disturbance that is or will be necessary for foreseeable maintenance and related activities, including the installation of new equipment/cabling. Any areas not accessed must be presumed to contain asbestos. The areas not accessed must be clearly identified on the survey report. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 12 of 64

13 4.7 Refurbishment and Demolition Surveys - A refurbishment and demolition survey is needed before any refurbishment or demolition work is carried out. This type of survey is used to locate and describe, as far as reasonably practicable, all ACMs in the area where the refurbishment will take place or in the whole building if demolition is planned. The survey will be fully intrusive and involve destructive inspection, as necessary, to gain access to all areas, including those that are difficult to reach. A refurbishment and demolition survey may also be required in other circumstances, e.g. when more intrusive maintenance and repair work will be carried out for plant removal or dismantling. 4.8 In this type of survey, where the asbestos is identified so it can be removed, the survey does not normally assess the condition of the asbestos, other than to indicate areas of damage or where additional asbestos debris may be present. However, where the asbestos removal work may not take place for some time, the ACMs condition will need to be assed and the material managed. 4.9 Refurbishment and demolition surveys are required to locate all asbestos in the building (or the relevant part), as far as reasonably practicable. It may require the surveyor(s) to penetrate all parts of the building structure. Aggressive inspection techniques will be needed to lift carpets and tiles, break through walls, ceilings, claddings and partitions, and open up floors. Refurbishment and demolition surveys should only be conducted in unoccupied areas to minimize risk to the public or employees. Ideally the buildings should not be in service and all furnishings removed. However there may be some circumstances where the building is still occupied at the time a demolition survey is carried out. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 13 of 64

14 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS 5.1 The results of the site inspections and any sampling are recorded on the enclosed Survey Data Sheets (Appendix II), Asbestos Register (Appendix I). 5.2 Where asbestos containing materials have been presumed and/or identified, a Material Assessment Algorithm, as detailed in HSG 264, has been assigned. Table 1: Material Assessment Algorithm Sample Variable Score Examples of Scores Product Type (or debris from product) Asbestos-reinforced composites (plastics, resins, mastics, roofing felts, vinyl floor tiles, semi-rigid paints or decorative finished, asbestos cement etc). Asbestos insulating board, mill board, other low density insulation boards, asbestos textiles, gaskets, ropes and woven textiles, asbestos paper and felt. Thermal insulation (eg pipe and boiler lagging), sprayed asbestos, loose asbestos, asbestos mattresses and packing. 0 Good condition: no visible damage Extent of Damage/Deterioration Surface Treatment Low damage: a few scratches or surface marks; broken edges on boards, tiles etc. Medium damage: significant breakage of materials or several small areas where material has been damaged revealing loose asbestos fibres. High damage or delamination of materials, sprays and thermal insulation. Visible asbestos debris. Composite materials containing asbestos: reinforced plastics, resins vinyl tiles. Enclosed sprays and lagging, AIB (with exposed face painted or encapsulation), asbestos cement sheets etc. 2 Unsealed AIB, or encapsulated lagging and sprays. 3 Unsealed lagging and sprays. 1 Chrysotile. Asbestos Type 2 Amphibole asbestos excluding crocidolite. 3 Crocidolite. MATERIAL RISK RATINGS Score Risk rating 10 High Risk 7 9 Medium Risk 1 6 Low Risk 4 Very Low Risk Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 14 of 64

15 6.0 ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT 6.1 PRIORITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM During a refurbishment survey the condition of the asbestos is usually not required as the ACM will be removed soon after the survey. However, in circumstances where the removal will not take place for some time after the survey (e.g. more than three months), the ACMs will have to be managed during this period. In this situation, the condition of the ACMs should also be determined and remedial action taken as appropriate. The material assessment identifies the high-risk materials, that is, those materials which will most readily release fibres if disturbed. To determine which materials will be given priority for remedial action, a Risk Assessment must be carried out which takes into account the following factors: maintenance activity; occupant activity; likelihood of disturbance; human exposure potential. The Risk Assessment is composed of the material assessment score and a priority assessment score, based on the above factors. The algorithm for the priority assessment is contained in Table 2. Under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 it is the responsibility of the dutyholder to ensure that a priority assessment for all ACMs identified during the course of a survey has been carried out. Any priority assessment and derived risk assessment carried out by Exova (UK) Limited are given as technical guidance only. This information is based on the property conditions at the time of the survey and should be reassessed if conditions within the property change i.e. occupancy level, usage of areas, accessibility etc. It should be noted that the priority assessment does not fall under Exova s scope of accreditation. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 15 of 64

16 Table 2: Priority Assessment Algorithm Assessment Factor Score Examples of Score Variables Overall Score 0 Rare disturbance activity (eg little used store room) Normal Occupant Activity Main type of activity in area 1 2 Low disturbance activities (eg office) Periodic disturbance (eg industrial or vehicular activity which may contact ACMs) Likelihood of Disturbance Human Exposure Potential Maintenance Activity Location Accessibility Extent/ amount N of occupants Frequency of use of area Average time area is in use Type of maintenance activity 3 High levels of disturbance (eg fire door in constant use) 0 Outdoors 1 Large rooms or well ventilated areas 2 Rooms up to 100m² 3 Confined spaces Usually inaccessible or unlikely to be 0 disturbed 1 Occasionally likely to be disturbed 2 Easily disturbed 3 Routinely disturbed 0 Small amounts or items (eg string or gaskets) 1 m² to 10m pipe run >10m² to 50m² or >10m to 50m 2 pipe run 3 >50m² or >50m pipe run 0 None 1 1 to to 10 3 > 10 0 Infrequently 1 Monthly 2 Weekly 3 Daily 0 < 1 hour 1 > 1 to < 3 hours 2 > 3 to < 6 hours 3 > 6 hours Minor disturbance 0 (eg possibility of contact when gaining access) Low disturbance 1 (eg changing light bulbs in ceiling) Medium disturbance (eg lifting ceiling tiles to access valve) High level of disturbance (eg removing board to replace a valve) ACM unlikely to be disturbed for maintenance Score Average of 3 variables Average of 3 variables Frequency of maintenance 1 1 per year 2 > 1 per year 3 > 1 per month Average of 2 variables Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 16 of 64

17 6.2 In addition, and in conjunction with the Risk Assessment, it is recommended that those responsible for the site should also implement the following in light of the findings of the Asbestos Survey: a b c d e f g Make safe or restrict access to any identified or presumed ACM that is in poor condition where there is a high potential of exposure to asbestos fibres by the site occupants. Review and update the organisations Asbestos Management Policy and Action Plan. Review safe working procedures for ACMs. Label where appropriate identified and presumed ACMs. Provide appropriate training and information to all those who are responsible for the day to day management of the site or those who may come into contact with ACMs as part of their normal employment. Regularly inspect all known identified and presumed ACMs, update, by a competent person, the Asbestos Risk Assessments and Asbestos Register on a 6-12 month basis. Carry out Refurbishment/Demolition Asbestos Surveys where any refurbishment or demolition is to take place. 6.3 If other materials not recorded within the Asbestos Survey Report are identified, for example by maintenance activities, refurbishment or demolition, and these materials are suspected of containing asbestos, it is strongly recommended that all activities should cease until an assessment of the material can be made. The appointed company employed to carry out sampling of suspect materials should be accredited by UKAS for site sampling and surveying. 6.4 Where Management Actions require abatement of ACMs, this should be carried out under controlled conditions. It is recommended that such works be subject to a Technical Specification compiled by an independent and impartial competent person. 6.5 The Client should consider that the abatement works be tendered on a competitive basis or competitive quotations sought from suitable licensed Asbestos Removal Contractors, and that an impartial and competent person should evaluate the licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor Method Statement, Programme and other relevant information. 6.6 All disturbance and removal of ACMs should be adequately controlled. All analytical monitoring and supervision, during and on completion of the works, should be conducted by an Analytical Consultancy appointed independently from the licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor who should verify the procedures and control employed by the licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor. The Analytical Consultancy should not have common ownership, management or an informal understanding with the licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor. 6.7 Any supervision of asbestos abatement works should be undertaken by an organisation holding a Supervisory Licence in accordance with the Control of Asbestos Regulations Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 17 of 64

18 7.0 BULK SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 7.1 All surveying, sampling, assessment and analysis techniques used are in strict accordance with the following Health & Safety Executive's guidance: Asbestos: The analysts guide (HSG 248). Asbestos: The survey guide (HSG 264). 7.2 It is a requirement of the above that: i ii iii iv All bulk sampling was carried out by the competent person named on the Survey Data Sheets. Any organisation engaged to carry out surveys must be accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) to undertake surveys for ACMs. All such work must have an adequate Risk Assessment of the site and the works must be carried out according to the procedures defined in the Risk Assessment. The work should minimise any disruption to the Client activities and must protect the health and safety of all persons who may be at risk, for example, where possible sampling was undertaken when the premises/areas were unoccupied. 7.3 Asbestos removal techniques have improved steadily over the years since the introduction of the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 1987, which laid down enforceable guidelines, with the result that asbestos removal undertaken before then would not have been of the same standard as required today. Whilst an area may have been stripped of asbestos (including plant rooms and ducts), before these regulations came into force or were generally recognised new coverings may have been added with the result that ACMs may be present below any coverings then applied or fitted. 7.4 Certain materials contain asbestos to varying degrees. Some may be less densely contaminated at certain locations (Artex for example). Where this is the case, the sample taken may not be representative of the whole product throughout. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 18 of 64

19 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 8.1 ACMs have been identified within, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Where ACMs have been identified, please refer to the enclosed Asbestos Register (Appendix I) and Survey Data Sheets (Appendix II) The spatial arrangement of sampling locations and occurrence of ACMs identified is depicted on the Site Location Plans enclosed (Appendix III) Asbestos with material assessment scores of 10 or more should be regarded as a high risk with a significant potential to release fibres if disturbed. Scores of between 7 and 9 are regarded as medium risk and between 5 and 6 as low risk. Scores of 4 or less are very low risk. Non-asbestos materials are not scored. The material assessment score represents the initial assessment of the priority for a control action. 8.2 During the course of site investigations it may not have been possible to access all areas of the site within the scope of the survey. Areas requiring further access are detailed within the enclosed Survey Data Sheets (Appendix II) and the Schedule of Limited/Non Accessible Access Areas are recorded in the report. In accordance with HSG 264, asbestos is presumed to be present within these areas and should be treated accordingly until further investigations prove otherwise. 8.3 AIRBORNE FIBRE COUNTS During the course of Exova (UK) Limited s site survey investigations, where requested by the client, air tests were conducted in accordance with the HSG248 'Asbestos: The analysts' guide for sampling, analysis and clearance procedures' The Health and Safety Executive Guidance HSG248 'Asbestos: The analysts' guide for sampling, analysis and clearance procedures' sets down control limits for the levels of airborne asbestos fibres in a workplace atmosphere The control limit detailed within Regulation 2 (entitled Interpretation ) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 relates to operatives who would come into contact with asbestos during their employment. There are currently no levels set for the general public. However, in terms of any exposure, airborne fibre levels should be controlled to as low as reasonably practicable. For most practicable purposes, this effectively means less than 0.01 fibres/ml. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 19 of 64

20 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 Kinetic Demolition should be aware of the possibility of the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) to those areas not accessible at the time of the survey or outside the scope of this survey. 9.2 The asbestos containing materials identified during the survey have been recorded and can be found in the executive summary on page 4 of the report with the appropriate actions against each ACM. 9.3 In order to comply with Sections 2 and 3 of the HSAW 1974 (as amended) and Regulation 10 of the CAR 2012 the survey findings should be brought to the attention of those persons who are likely to come in contact with asbestos. 9.4 In order to comply with Regulation 3 of The Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations (as amended) 1999 and Regulation 6 of CAR 2012, a suitable and sufficient Risk Assessment must be carried out on identified and presumed ACMs. 9.5 Regular inspections must be undertaken (six - twelve monthly minimum) to record and update details of the condition of retained ACMs. It is recommended that regular air monitoring take place in all areas of the site where ACMs have been identified that have the potential to release asbestos fibres. In order to assess airborne fibre levels within adjacent occupied areas in relation to the clearance indicator level of 0.01 f/ml, as documented by the HSE (ie: Guidance Note HSG248) Appropriately label any identified ACMs in accordance with Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations Appropriate training must be provided to all those responsible for the day to day management of the site and those who may/will come into contact with ACMs as part of their normal employment. 9.7 Exova (UK) Limited recommends that the findings of this Asbestos Survey Report shall not be solely relied upon in obtaining costs for proposed asbestos abatement work. Any proposed abatement/removal of the asbestos should be undertaken against a detailed Specification. The Specification should encompass the site conditions and the extent of ACMs/contamination present. 9.8 Prior to access/disturbance into all areas outside the scope of this survey, or identified as limited/no access, further investigations should be carried out. On the first occasion that access is gained into these areas it is recommended that Exova (UK) Limited completes the survey work. 9.9 As stated in HSG 264, a refurbishment and demolition survey will be required for all work which disturbs the fabric of the building in areas where the management survey has not been intrusive. Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G September 2016 Page 20 of 64

21 Appendix I Asbestos Register

22 Asbestos Register & Risk Management Plan for:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Building Floor Area Location Description Amount Sample No & Asbestos Type Material Assessment Score Priority Assessment Score Total Score Risk Rating Action Date Recommendations 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 8m Chrysotile Medium 14/12/2016 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Area relates to room size 25m Chrysotile Medium 14/12/2016 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 5m Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Ceiling/external roof - Asbestos cement 700m Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Bitumen felt in gutter - Bitumen 35m Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 14m2 As SP: Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix I - September 2016 Page 22 of 64

23 Asbestos Register & Risk Management Plan for:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Building Floor Area Location Description Amount Sample No & Asbestos Type Material Assessment Score Priority Assessment Score Total Score Risk Rating Action Date Recommendations 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 6m2 As SP: Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Area relates to room size 10m2 As SP: Chrysotile Medium 14/12/2016 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 2m2 As SP: Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Ceiling - debris behind wire mesh - Asbestos cement Debris present at various locations throughout room m2 As SP: Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove 543 Gorgie Road 0 (Ground Floor) 026 Externals Roof of room Asbestos cement 60m2 As SP: Chrysotile Low 14/09/2017 Remove Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix I - September 2016 Page 23 of 64

24 Appendix II Survey Data Sheets

25 SURVEY DATA SHEETS The survey data sheets identify: Site Surveyor Description Building Floor Room/Area Ref Inspection Date Site Address The Lead Surveyor s name. This describes the material (eg: board above door, grey floor tiles, etc). Each unique building on the site will be named individually. All floors will be individually named including roof levels, mezzanine floors and basements. A unique reference number for each room or area on site shall be cross referenced and marked on available plans. This number shall subsequently be transposed onto the survey data sheet for ease of identification. The date of the initial survey, or the latest re-inspection survey. Action Date Survey Type Sample N Photograph N ID Ref Asbestos Type Product Type This is the date by which any asbestos containing material identified or presumed that remain in-situ should be reinspected. Management Survey or Refurbishment/Demolition Survey. This is the number given to the sample taken on-site. The sample number is marked onto the selfadhesive sample identification label, which is attached adjacent to the sample location. This sample number is identified on the bulk identification certificate. A unique number generated by the digital camera. Where N/A is inserted no photograph has been taken. A sequential ID reference number (eg: 002, 003, etc) to be inserted for every new entry to the survey data sheet. Either the result of analysis of a bulk sample, or an indication that the presence of asbestos has been strongly presumed because there is a sample of a visually similar material or presumed because of no access by the surveyor. These are as defined within HSG 264 and are assigned additive values that contribute to the Material Score. Where by analysis samples are not asbestos these are reported as NAD on the Survey Data Sheets. The type of material identified (eg. Board, thermal insulation, etc). These are as defined within HSG 264 and are assigned additive values that contribute to the Material Score. Damage Extent Good condition, low damage, medium damage, high damage. These are as defined within HSG 264 and are assigned additive values that contribute to the Material Score. Surface Treatment Accessibility Approximate Quantity Material Score Priority Score An indication of the physical protection applied to an asbestos containing material (eg. Unsealed AIB, enclosed sprays and lagging, etc). These are as defined within HSG 264 and are assigned additive values that contribute to the Material Score. An indication of the likelihood for disturbance (eg: usually inaccessible, routinely disturbed etc). An indication (estimate) of the extent of the material. The estimate shall not be relied upon to form part of any Specification or Bill of Quantities. A material assessment score shall be identified following an assessment of product type, extent of damage, surface treatment and asbestos type, as defined in HSG 264 and outlined in the material assessment algorithm as detailed in Section 5.2 of this Asbestos Survey Report. Following analysis and material score in conjunction with the Duty holder this will determine which materials will be given priority for remedial action, which will form part of your Management Plan Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 25 of 64

26 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: Approximate Quantity: Accessibility 0 (Ground Floor) Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper 8m 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 3 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 7 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 8 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/12/2016 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 26 of 64

27 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Office Ceiling - Textured coating Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Textured coating Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 27 of 64

28 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Office Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Approximate Quantity: 25m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 3 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 7 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 8 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: Recommendation: Area relates to room size Remove Action Date: 14/12/2016 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 28 of 64

29 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Office Ceiling - putty around windows - Mastics Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Mastics Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 29 of 64

30 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Approximate Quantity: 5m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 2 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 6 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 7 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 30 of 64

31 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Warehouse Ceiling/external roof - Asbestos cement Approximate Quantity: 700m² Accessibility 0 (Usually inaccessible) Asbestos Type: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: Product Type: 1 Product: Asbestos cement Damage Extent: 2 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 5 Priority Assessment: 0 Total Assessment 5 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 31 of 64

32 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Warehouse Ceiling & wall panels - Cement products Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Cement products Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 32 of 64

33 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: Approximate Quantity: Accessibility 0 (Ground Floor) Warehouse Bitumen felt in gutter - Bitumen 35m 0 (Usually inaccessible) Asbestos Type: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: Product Type: 1 Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: 1 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 0 Material Score: 3 Priority Assessment: 0 Total Assessment 3 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 33 of 64

34 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Store DPM around perimeter of room at base of wall - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 34 of 64

35 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Roof felt above rooms 24 & 25 - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 35 of 64

36 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Roof felt above room 24 - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 36 of 64

37 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Putty around windows of rooms 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 & 22 - Mastics Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Mastics Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 37 of 64

38 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals DPM below cement roof sheets on room Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 38 of 64

39 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Roof felt above rooms 008 & Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 39 of 64

40 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Externals Roof felt above room Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 40 of 64

41 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Approximate Quantity: 14m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 2 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 6 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 7 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 41 of 64

42 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Office Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Approximate Quantity: 6m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 2 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 6 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 7 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 42 of 64

43 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Kitchen Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Approximate Quantity: 10m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 3 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 7 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 8 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: Recommendation: Area relates to room size Remove Action Date: 14/12/2016 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 43 of 64

44 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Toilet Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Approximate Quantity: 2m² Accessibility 1 (Occasionally likely to be disturbed) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 2 Product: Paper Damage Extent: 2 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 6 Priority Assessment: 1 Total Assessment 7 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 44 of 64

45 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Warehouse Ceiling - debris behind wire mesh - Asbestos cement Approximate Quantity: 10m² Accessibility 0 (Usually inaccessible) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 1 Product: Asbestos cement Damage Extent: 3 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 6 Priority Assessment: 0 Total Assessment 6 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: Debris present at various locations throughout room 015. Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 45 of 64

46 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Externals Roof of room Asbestos cement Approximate Quantity: 60m² Accessibility 0 (Usually inaccessible) Asbestos Type: SP: 1 (Chrysotile) Sample No: As Product Type: 1 Product: Asbestos cement Damage Extent: 1 Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: 1 Material Score: 4 Priority Assessment: 0 Total Assessment 4 Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: Remove Action Date: 14/09/2017 Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 46 of 64

47 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: 0 (Ground Floor) Store DPM around perimeter of room at base of wall - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: As Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 47 of 64

48 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Roof felt above room 25 - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: As Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 48 of 64

49 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals DPM in gutter between rooms 010 and Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: As Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 49 of 64

50 SURVEY DATA SHEETS Site: Survey Type:, Edinburgh, EH11 3AR Refurbishment/Demolition Survey Project Number: G Surveyor: David Cook, Lawrie Ciano Inspection Date: 14/09/2016 Building: Floor: Area: Description: External Externals Roof felt above rooms 22 & 23 - Bitumen Approximate Quantity: - Accessibility - Asbestos Type: NAD Sample No: As Product Type: - Product: Bitumen Damage Extent: - Analysed By: Chelsea McIlvaney Surface Treatment: - Material Score: - Priority Assessment: - Total Assessment - Photo ID ID Ref <ID> Comments: - Recommendation: - Action Date: - Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix II - September 2016 Page 50 of 64

51 Appendix III Site Location Plans

52 Ground Floor Offices & Warhouse 014 As As As No access gained Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix III - September 2016 Page 52 of 64

53 Ground Floor Offices & Warhouse Area As No access gained 024 As As As As As Area Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix III - September 2016 Page 53 of 64

54 First Floor Offices Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix III - September 2016 Page 54 of 64

55 Externals As As As As Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix III - September 2016 Page 55 of 64

56 Appendix IV Non-Asbestos Building Elements Register

57 Non Asbestos Building Elements Register Building Floor Area Location Material Construction 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 001 Entrance foyer Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 002 Circulation Floor - Carpet over concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Floor - Carpet tiles 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 003 Office Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 004 Cupboard Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 004 Cupboard Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 004 Cupboard Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Ceiling - Plasterboard 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Floor - Carpet tiles 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 005 Office 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Wall 2 - within timber riser - No asbestos detected Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Floor - Modern lino 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Floor - Concrete Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix IV - September 2016 Page 57 of 64

58 Non Asbestos Building Elements Register Building Floor Area Location Material Construction 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Wall 3 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Wall 3 - boiler - Modern 0 (Ground Floor) 006 Kitchen Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Floor - Carpet tiles 0 (Ground Floor) 007 Office Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Ceiling - Glass 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 008 Office Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Wall 3 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Cistern - Plastic 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 009 Toilet Ceiling void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Walls - Glass 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Ceiling - Glass 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Walls 1 & 2 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 010 Warehouse Ceiling - Timber Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix IV - September 2016 Page 58 of 64

59 Non Asbestos Building Elements Register Building Floor Area Location Material Construction 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Floor - Carpet over concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 011 Office Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Wall 2 - pipe lagging - Foam insulation 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 012 Kitchen Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Walls - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Ceiling level - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 013 Circulation Wall 3 - pipe lagging - Foam insulation 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Ceiling level - pipe lagging - Foam insulation 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Cistern - Plastic 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Wall 2 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Ceiling - Fibre board 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Ceiling Void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 014 Toilet Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Wall 1 - water tank - Metal 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Walls - Brick Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix IV - September 2016 Page 59 of 64

60 Non Asbestos Building Elements Register Building Floor Area Location Material Construction 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Ceiling level - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Wall 4 - electrics - 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Walls - Breeze block 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Hot water tank insulation - Foam insulation Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Mezzanine - Water tanks - Plastic 0 (Ground Floor) 015 Warehouse Pipe lagging - Foam insulation 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Floor void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Walls 1 & 3 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Floor - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Ceiling void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 016 Office Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Ceiling void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Floor - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Wall 4 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 017 Circulation Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Wall 1 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Ceiling void - No asbestos detected 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Walls - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 018 Office Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 019 Toilet Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 019 Toilet Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 019 Toilet Walls - Breeze block 0 (Ground Floor) 019 Toilet Wall 3 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 019 Toilet Cistern - Plastic Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix IV - September 2016 Page 60 of 64

61 Non Asbestos Building Elements Register Building Floor Area Location Material Construction 0 (Ground Floor) 020 Toilet Cistern - Plastic 0 (Ground Floor) 020 Toilet Ceiling - Timber 0 (Ground Floor) 020 Toilet Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 020 Toilet Wall 3 - pipe lagging - Hessian 0 (Ground Floor) 020 Toilet Walls - Breeze block 0 (Ground Floor) 024 Store Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 024 Store Walls - Brick 0 (Ground Floor) 024 Store Ceiling - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 025 Store Floor - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 025 Store Ceiling - Concrete 0 (Ground Floor) 025 Store Walls - Brick 1 (First Floor) 021 Stairwell Wall 2 - pipe lagging - Hessian 1 (First Floor) 021 Stairwell Floor - Modern lino 1 (First Floor) 021 Stairwell Floor - Concrete 1 (First Floor) 021 Stairwell Ceiling - Timber 1 (First Floor) 021 Stairwell Walls - Timber 1 (First Floor) 022 Office Ceiling - Timber 1 (First Floor) 022 Office Floor void - No asbestos detected 1 (First Floor) 022 Office Walls - Timber 1 (First Floor) 022 Office Floor - Timber 1 (First Floor) 023 Office Floor void - No asbestos detected 1 (First Floor) 023 Office Floor - Timber 1 (First Floor) 023 Office Walls - Timber 1 (First Floor) 023 Office Ceiling - Timber External 026 Externals External Walls - Brick External 026 Externals External Walls - Roughcast External 026 Externals Rainwater goods & pipework - No asbestos detected Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix IV - September 2016 Page 61 of 64

62 Appendix V Bulk Analysis Certificate

63 Exova (UK) Ltd T: Montrose Avenue F: Hillington Park W: Glasgow G52 4LA Test Certificate Kinetic Demolition Midlothian Innovation Centre Pentlandfield Roslin EH25 9RE REF No G Date Tested: 16/09/2016 Date Received 14/09/2016 Sampled by: David Cook Attn: Item: James Warren Analysis of material from, Edinburgh Asbestos survey HSG 264 & HSG 248 Sample No. Description Result Comments Ground Floor, Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Chrysotile Ground Floor, Office Ceiling - Textured coating NAD Ground Floor, Office Floor - paper backed lino debris - Paper Chrysotile Ground Floor, Office Ceiling - putty around windows - Mastics NAD Ground Floor, Circulation Floor - paper backed lino - Paper Chrysotile Ground Floor, Warehouse Ceiling/external roof - Asbestos cement Chrysotile Ground Floor, Warehouse Ceiling & wall panels - Cement products NAD Ground Floor, Warehouse Bitumen felt in gutter - Bitumen Chrysotile Ground Floor, Store DPM around perimeter of room at base of wall - Bitumen NAD External, Externals Roof felt above rooms 24 & 25 - Bitumen NAD External, Externals Roof felt above room 24 - Bitumen NAD External, Externals Putty around windows of rooms 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 & 22 - Mastics NAD External, Externals DPM below cement roof sheets on room Bitumen NAD External, Externals Roof felt above rooms 008 & Bitumen NAD Ground Floor, Externals Roof felt above room Bitumen NAD Kinetic Demolition Project Ref: G Appendix V - September 2016 Page 63 of 64