BREAKING GROUND WITH ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BREAKING GROUND WITH ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY"

Transcription

1 BREAKING GROUND WITH ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY Matt McCarter and Mike Midkiff October 10, 2017

2 Agenda 1 2 What is Design-Build What we can do our design-build legislative authority What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? How PFD can help Questions

3 What is Design-Build An alternative project delivery method to traditional design-bid-build Primarily a construction contract that includes: Design Utility coordination and relocation May also include: Right-of-way acquisition Obtaining environmental permits A single contract fixed price fixed schedule 3

4 4

5 What is Design-Build US 77 Corpus Christi IH-35 E - Dallas Question: What is the range in price for past TxDOT design-build projects? Answer is B: Smallest: US 77 at $84M Largest: IH-35 E at $1.4B 5

6 6

7 What is Design-Build Question: Can advancing a project as a design-build project allow TxDOT to expend construction funds sooner than a design-bid-build project? Answer is A: Yes $ 7

8 What is Design-Build Construction funds are committed at the execution of the DB contract before completion of Utility Coordination/Relocation, ROW acquisition and/or Environmental Permitting Design-Bid-Build Design-Build Timeline Timeline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 NEPA/Schematic Design Procurement Environmental Contract Execution Permits Utility DesignCoordination Utility Environmental Relocation Permits ROW Utility Acquisition Coordination Letting Utility Relocation Contract ROW Acquisition Execution Construction 9 months months 15 months 912 months months 24 9 months 312 months 21 months months 8

9 What is Design-Build Construction funds are committed at the execution of the DB contract before completion of Utility Coordination/Relocation, ROW acquisition and/or Environmental Permitting Design-Build Timeline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 NEPA/Schematic Procurement 9 months 15 months Contract Execution Design Environmental Permits Utility Coordination Utility Relocation ROW Acquisition Construction 12 months 15 months 9 months 12 months 21 months 24 months 9

10 What we can do our design-build legislative authority Texas Administrative code (TAC) Rule refers to Texas Transportation Code (TTC) Chapter (d-1) Subchapter F: Limits 3 Design-Build projects executed per Fiscal Year CONSTRUCTION DESIGN Total Cost 10

11 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Design-Build Cost >$150M Project Development Project has not advanced beyond final schematic Status and complexity of: Utility coordination and relocation Right of way acquisition Obtaining environmental permits 11

12 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Complexity Would the project benefit from innovative designconstruction methodologies early in the conceptual/schematic design phase? Would the project benefit from designer-contractor integration to reduce coordination challenges? Site Conditions How well are Site Conditions known? (geotechnical/ soil conditions, hazardous materials, utilities) Alternative Delivery Support Tool Completed Documents that the project is eligible for Design-Build 12

13 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Interview the three candidate projects Discuss some of their characteristics Choose the project that s the ideal match for Design-Build

14 Project 1 Project 1 $850M Complex 1 Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement Preliminary schematic for interim improvements Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and main lane and frontage reconstruction ROW acquisition some acquired by TxDOT, some acquired by DB Contractor Political completion commitment before end of

15 Project 2 Project 2 $300M Not complex Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement Preliminary schematic for interim improvements Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and electric/water coordination/relocation No additional ROW acquisition Political completion commitment 2 15

16 Project 3 Proejct 3 $84M Low complexity typical construction of portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads EIS/ROD Approved schematic design No significant utility relocation typical utility coordination/relocation for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads ROW acquisition for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads No completion commitment No significant permits typical permits are needed 3 16

17 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build? Project 1: $850M Complex Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement Preliminary schematic for interim improvements Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and main lane and frontage reconstruction ROW acquisition some acquired by TxDOT, some acquired by DB Contractor Political completion commitment before end of

18 18

19 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build? Project 2: $300M Not complex Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement Preliminary schematic for interim improvements Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and electric/ water coordination/relocation No additional ROW acquisition Political completion commitment 19

20 20

21 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build? Project 3: $84M Low complexity typical construction of portions of freeway/ highway and adjacent frontage roads EIS/ROD Approved schematic design No significant utility relocation typical utility coordination/relocation for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads ROW acquisition for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads No completion commitment No significant permits typical permits are needed 21

22 22

23 What makes a project a good candidate for design-build? Answer: Projects 1 and 2 are good candidates for design-build. Project 1: Project 2: Project 3: Would not meet current >$150M minimum design-build cost 23

24 24

25 How PFD can help Question: How many design-build projects has TxDOT developed/advanced? Answer is: C TxDOT has advanced 16 design-build projects 25

26 How PFD can help In Design & Construction CDA Statute: Chapter 223 Subchapter E IH-35E $1.36B Loop 375 BWE (CDA-DB) $640M $1.36B SH 183 Midtown Express $1.04B Loop 375 BWE (CDA-DB) $640M US 181 Harbor Bridge $963M SH 183 Midtown Express (CDA-DB) $1.04B In Design & Construction Design-Build (DB) Statute: Chapter 223 Subchapter F (limited to 3 per FY ) Horseshoe US 181 Harbor Bridge $805M $805M $963M US 77 $84M SH US 7177 Express Lanes $139M $84M SH Express Lanes $340M $139M SH 99 GP Segments (H-I) $1.28B Southern SH 360 Gateway $606M $340M SH DFW 2499 Connector GP Segments (H-I) $674M $1.36B $1.28B SH Southern 99 Grand Gateway Parkway (GP) $606M DFW Connector $1.36B (CDA-DB) $1.57B SH Segments Grand Parkway (F1, F2, (GP) & G) $674M $1.57B (CDA-DB) Segments (F1, F2, & G) Loop 1604 $126M CTTS - (SH 130 Seg 1-4) $1.4B (DESIGN-BUILD) In Operations and Maintenance (All Projects) Loop 1604 $126M (DESIGN-BUILD) CTTS - (SH 130 Seg 1-4) $1.4B (DESIGN-BUILD) 26

27 How PFD can help We re looking for bench depth as we re building TxDOT s five-year plan and ten-year forecast

28 Questions We are ready for your questions.? 28