INITIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SIAR)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "INITIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SIAR)"

Transcription

1 INITIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SIAR) Factory Gilarchala, Gorgaria Master bari Sreepur, Gazipur Sreepur, Gazipur 22 Apr 2014 The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 1/10

2 Factory 22 Apr 2014 Introduction to the Report The following report contains a site profile and summary of non-conformities identified during an onsite assessment commissioned by the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety (Alliance) and conducted by a third-party Qualified Assessment Firm (QAF). The assessment was conducted against the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Assessment Protocols (APs) and Fire Safety and Structural Integrity Standard, which is harmonized with the factory assessment guidelines developed by Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) for the Bangladesh National Tripartite Plan of Action (NTPA). The goal of the Alliance process is to provide clear and practical technical requirements by which Bangladeshi Ready Made Garment (RMG) Factories producing for Alliance members may be consistently and fairly evaluated for fire, structural, and electrical safety in a non-duplicative manner. Each assessment will prompt action plans that will be used by RMG factories to systematically and sustainably improve safety conditions for garment workers. Beyond tracking and reporting on action steps taken in a transparent manner, the Alliance organization and its members will seek to further support factory improvements through technical assistance, training, implementation support for functional Worker Committees, and in some cases financial assistance and wage support for workers if factories are closed for remediation. The contents of the report do not constitute a guarantee of compliance with the applicable laws, the Alliance Standard or the absolute or continued safety against fire, electrical and/or structural integrity issues that may lead to injury or loss of life. The report is designed to provide a non-exhaustive summary of risk issues, based on a limited sampling and duration of time onsite by the named QAF. Neither the QAF nor the Alliance can certify or guarantee the quality, outcome, or effectiveness of actions taken in response to the report. For more information and report feedback please go to: The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 2/10

3 22 Apr 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION General Information Factory Country: Province: City: Bangladesh Dhaka Sreepur, Gazipur Zip Code: 1740 Audit Duration: Re-Audit: 10 Hours Re-Audit After 0 Months Draft Report Date : 19 May 2014 Final Report Date : 23 May 2014 Are all Action Items From Previous Assessment Completed?: Buildings in Complex : Number of Building Levels (Stories) : Approximate Building Area (SF) : Date of Building Construction : Date of Last Building Renovation/Addition : Is the Building mixed use?: Ancillary Structures in Complex : Number of Ancillary Levels (Stories) : Approximate Ancillary N/A Two (02), One main building and one ancillary building Five storied with one basement in old part of the main building and five storied in new part of the main building Old part: 74,400 sft, New part: 33,600 sft Total floor area: 108,000 sft Old part: , New part: 2013 The new part of the building was added in 2013 No One (01) One storied 2,065 sft The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 3/10

4 22 Apr 2014 Structures Area (SF) : Number of Occupants : Total occupants are approximately 1650 Exterior Facade Description : Structural System Description : 5 inch unreinforced brick masonry with 30 window and open space in front of building RC flat plate in old part and RC beam-column frame system in new part of the building The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 4/10

5 22 Apr 2014 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS Structural System Design If the structure has been previously expanded, was the structural impact on the entire structure analytically evaluated and confirmed by a qualified structural engineer. One extra floor was added in 2011 in the old part of the building and the new part of the building was added in 2013, but the structural impact on the entire structure was not analytically evaluated by a qualified structural engineer. Document Review: ASP 1.0 Have a qualified structural engineer complete an analytical evaluation of the structural impact of the addition. Reference Alliance Standards Part 8 Section 8.1 Applicability of Building Code. Are credible structural design documents available for review and kept on site? Non-Compliance Level: 1 For new part of the building the structural drawings is credible but there are no detail drawings for old part of the building so credibility check can be possible at this stage of investigation. Document Review: Structural drawings of old part and new part of the building Have a qualified structural engineer prepare credible as-built documents of old building based on the requirements of Part 8 Section 8.19 of the Alliance Standard. Alliance Standard Part 8 Section 8.19 Required Structural Documentation for New and Existing Factories Can credible structural documentation indicating general conformance with 2006 BNBC or other comparable applicable international model building code be produced? The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 5/10

6 22 Apr 2014 Non-Compliance Level: 1 For new part of the building they use BNBC But the old part of the building was built before There was no indication of use of any international building code shown in the drawing. Document Review: Structural design drawings of new part and old part of the building Engage a qualified structural engineer to develop the required documents for old part of the building to confirm the structural integrity of the buildings. Documents must comply with Alliance Standard Part 8 Section 8.19 and Reference Alliance Standards Part 8 Section 8.2 Structural Integrity of Existing Factory Buildings Can documentation be provided that the building is compliant with the requirements for wind loading and storm surge loadings as detailed in BNBC Part 6 Section 1.5.3? Non-Compliance Level: 1 The new part of the building is compliant with the wind loading and storm surge loadings requirements as detailed in BNBC Part 6 Section For old part wind load and storm surge loading are not mentioned in the drawings. Document Review: Structural design drawings of new part and old part of the building Engage a qualified structural engineer to confirm satisfactory structural performance of the old part of the building under wind loading BNBC Part 6 Section 1.5. Compliance may be waived if the Factory Owner provides satisfactory evidence of a cyclone operations plan that includes full evacuation of the factory in advance of any approaching cyclone" Are Certificates of Occupancy available for review? Low Certificates of occupancy are not available for review. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 6/10

7 22 Apr 2014 Provide Certificates of Occupancy for review Alliance Standard Part 8 Section 8.3 Preliminary Structural Assessment Structural System Construction Is the structural system free of distress, settlement, shifting, or cracking in columns or walls? High We found small crack in a column near expansion joint of the two part of the building. Visual Assessment: Photograph of crack in column Engage a qualified structural engineer to provide further testing and analysis of distress, settlement, shifting, or cracking in columns or walls and provide a remediation plan to correct noted issues. Alliance Standard Part 8 Section Are all non-structural elements suspended from, attached to, or resting atop the structure adequately anchored and braced to resist earthquake forces? We did not find any anchored storage racks on the second floor. Visual Assessment: Photograph of non-structural element Develop engineered plans to brace all non-structural elements (storage rack) to resist earthquake forces to comply with the BNBC and Alliance Standard. Install anchor and braces as shown on approved plans. Alliance Standards Part 8 Section 8.18 Seismic Bracing of Key Non-Structural Elements and 2006 BNBC Part 6 The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 7/10

8 22 Apr 2014 If yes, have the structural members constructed with MCAC been investigated by an appropriate program of in-situ testing and representative destructive testing or core samples? Non-Compliance Level: 1 In-situ testing (UPV) was performed during inspection. But no core test result was available. Uploaded Document: Concrete compressive strength calculation from UPV result, Visual Assessment: Photograph of UPV testing at column Have a qualified structural engineer assess the durability aspects as suggested in Alliance Standard Part 7 Section 7.2 and take appropriate remedial measures. This assessment should include destructive core testing to verify the concrete compressive strength of columns. Reference Alliance Standards Part 7 Building Materials Section 7.2 Masonrychip aggregate concrete (MCAC) If yes, have the structural members constructed with MCAC been investigated by an appropriate program of in-situ testing and representative destructive testing or core samples? Non-Compliance Level: 1 In-situ testing (UPV) was performed during inspection. But no core test result was available. Visual Assessment: Photograph of UPV testing at column Have a qualified structural engineer assess the durability aspects as suggested in Alliance Standard Part 7 Section 7.2 and take appropriate remedial measures. This assessment should include destructive core testing to verify the concrete compressive strength of columns. Reference Alliance Standards Part 7 Building Materials Section 7.2 Masonrychip aggregate concrete (MCAC) Structural Safety Programs Is a program in place to ensure that the live loads for which a floor or roof is or has been designed will not be exceeded? The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 8/10

9 22 Apr 2014 There was no program in place to ensure the live loads for which a floor or roof has been designed. So it is required and it should be marked in all floors including roof. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 Develop a program to ensure that all live loads for which a floor or roof has been designed for will not be exceeded. The designated Load Manager shall oversee this program and ensure it is enforced. Alliance Standard Part 13 Section 13.7 and Part 8 Section 8.9. Have Load Plans been prepared for each floor documenting the actual maximum operational loading that is intended and/or allowable on each floor. Low Load plans have not prepared for all floors of the building. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 Have a qualified structural engineer develop Floor Loading Plans per the requirements of Part 8 Section Alliance Standard Part 8 Section 8.10 Floor Loading Plans (Load Plans) Are Floor Load Plans posted as required? Low No floor load plan was posted on the floors of the building. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 Have a qualified structural engineer prepare load plans including the information required in Section 8.20 of the Alliance Standard. Alliance Standard Part 8 Section Are areas used for storage of work materials and work products, clearly marked to indicate the acceptable loading limits as described in the Load Plan The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 9/10

10 22 Apr 2014 for that floor? Low Storage areas are required to be marked to indicate acceptable loading limits per the load plans. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 Provide signage or the appropriate markings at all areas used for storage to indicate the acceptable loading limits detailed in the Load Plan. Alliance Standard Part 8 Section 8.11 Floor Load Markings Is a designated representative (Factory Load Manager), who is onsite full time, trained regarding the structural floor capacity, and serves as an ongoing vendor resource and monitor of operational factory floor loadings? Low No factory load manager was onsite full time. So, a factory load manager is required to check whether the loads exceed or not as per floor load plan. Visual Assessment: Site visit on April 22, 2014 Designate a representative as the Factory Load Manager. The Factory Owner shall ensure that at least one individual, the Factory Load Manager who is located onsite full time at the factory, is trained in calculating operational load characteristics of the specific factory. The Factory Load Manager shall serve as an ongoing resource to RMG vendors and be responsible to ensure that the factory operational loads do not at any time exceed the factory floor loading limits as described on the Floor Loading Plans. Alliance Standards Part 8 Section 8.9 Factory Load Manager The Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Page 10/10