Time and Cost Optimization of Construction Project Using Mivan Technology

Transcription

1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Tie and Cost Optiization of Construction Project Using Mivan Technology Akshay Gulghane 1, Nikhil Pitale 2, Sanket Sanghai 3 1 (Departent of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni college of engineering, Nagpur (Departent of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni college of engineering, Nagpur (Departent of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni college of engineering, Nagpur Corresponding Author: Akshay Gulghane OPEN ACCESS ABSTRACT Construction is one of the significant sectors and integral part of Indian econoy. Also, it is of the iportant paraeter in developent of country. India is desperately planning for rapid anufacturing and creation of dwelling units for econoical construction facilities Forwork enables to cast and construct the iportant eleents and coponents of any construction facilities, which are required to be strong and effectively handle the structure. Mivan is coparatively a new construction technology upcoing for successful copletion of ass project especially repetitive in nature. In this paper we have discussed about cost as well as tie coparison of ivan technology with conventional forwork technology. The Mivan technology is appreciably efficient with cost, quality and tie saving as copare to conventional one. The basic ideology is to reach a sturdy conclusion regarding the superiority of the two techniques over another. Keywords Forwork, MIVAN, Tie and Cost optiization, Project Date of Subission: Date of acceptance: I. INTRODUCTION The Mivan Technology Syste was developed by Malaysian copany as a efficient syste for constructing the ass housing projects in the developing countries. To be erected by the structural eleents any tie that to of a repetitive design, the syste ensures a fast and econoical ethod of construction. The strong concrete surface finish produced with the aluiniu fors allows achieveent of a excellent quality wall finish without the need for external as well as internal plastering. This particular syste is identified to be very uch suitable for Indian conditions for ass structural construction, where quality and speed can be achieved at excellent level that too at econoical cost. The speed of construction by this particular syste will surpass the speed of ost of the other recent construction ethods and technologies used. Mivan is one of the sophisticatedengineered forwork fabricated in Aluiniu Monolithic pouring. Walls, coluns, slabs & bea are poured together in particular syste. The utilization of ivan forwork in the construction industry of India is coparatively very less as to the other developing or developed countries around the globe. The utilization of ivan forwork technology in construction industry has the greater potential. This forwork as an sophisticated construction aterial but it is also econoical in heavy type of construction. This recent ethod of construction by this technology can appreciably increase the productivity of construction, built quality and durability of construction work through the use of efficient construction tools, construction aterials, and tie for construction saving copared to conventional technologies or ethods. This technology is one of the recent construction technologies upcoing at the greater speed for the successful copletion various construction project across Indian construction industry, especially ass housing project. This particular study is very essential because it can provide the necessary iportant inforation on the building total cost and coplete duration coparison between the conventional available systes and Mivan building syste in Indian construction industry, where econoy and tie both play very iportant role. II. OBJECTIVES a. Quantity estiation of construction aterial required for building by both MIVAN forwork and Conventional forwork. b. To deterine coplete tie required for copletion of the building by both the above ethods. c. To copare the cost of buildings based on the cost of aterials required in each of the. d. To carry out the coparative analysis between the entioned two ethods of construction and define suitability difference between the. DOI: / P a g e

2 III. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND COMPONENTS OF MIVAN The basic eleents included in Mivan Forwork are the sets of panels, which are a shear extruded aluiniu rail section, fully welded to an aluiniu etal sheet. This produces include a sets of copletely lightweight panel with an excellent stiffness to weight ratio also yielding inial deflection under coplete concrete loading. These Panels are costued anufactured in the particular size and shape to suit the coplete requireents of specific types of projects. The forwork panels are ade fro very high strength aluiniu alloy with a iniu thickness of 4 skin plate and 6 thick ribbing behind to fully stiffen the panels restricting the fro falling apart. These ivan forwork coponents are very uch durable so they can be efficiently used repetitively up to 200 ties for the construction projects. With the durability they also are very uch light weighted so heavy lifting the is easy thing, the heaviest coponents is of 25 kg, so that huan lifting ethods are also possible. Following are the soe of the coponents that are generally used in the construction projects. a) Bea coponents b) Deck coponents c) Wall coponents d) Miscellaneous coponents FIG 3.1: Bea side panel and Prop head Fig 3.2: - Deck Panel IV. METHODOLOGY Cubic Contents Method Cubic Contents Method is particularly used to find the coplete volue of the construction activities. In this precise ethod the length, width and the depth of the construction eleents is ultiplied to obtain the total quantity of that particular eleent. In the case of plastering of the surfaces and other surfacing works the coplete surface area is found by ultiplying the length with the width for which the work is to be done. The rate per unit of the construction work is then ultiplied with the total quantity of the work to get the aount required to do the particular work. This ethod is ore often used for ultistoreyed construction facilities. It is ore accurate that the other two ethods viz., plinth area ethod and unit base ethod of coputing. The cost of a construction facility is coputed approxiately as the total cubical contents i.e. Volue of structure ultiplied by the available Local Cubic Rate. The total volue of building is obtained by Length ultiplayer by breadth and depth or height of the structure. The coplete length and breadth are easured out to out of walls excluding the plinth offset of the structure. The coplete cost of the string course, cornice, corbelling etc., is neglected. Forwork Planning The coplete Forwork planning process is categorized into 3 ain stages In First stage all the necessary inforation and liiting conditions ust be efficiently collected and appropriately defined. When construction projects of the siilar nature are being executed, a proper and foratted checklist can be of iense help in obtaining coplete inforation required to prepare a coplete pre-plan. In second stage The forwork syste which has to be used in the building the construction facility can be properly selected. In addition to total cost of the aterials which has to be used, the choice of the efficient syste will be influenced by the experience of the planning tea. A coplete database that particularly captures the coplete experience collected over the nuber of years can contribute in cost effective syste selection. The third stage involves all engineering related designing tasks. This is ost tie consuing part of the particular process. One of the iportant thing is to have the flexibility in the working of syste in later stages of the project. The coplete ephasis should be on axiu reuse of available aterials and procuring iniu aterials that to Just-In-Tie. FIG 3.3: - Wall panel and Kicker DOI: / P a g e

3 Aluinu Forwork Syste The aluiniu Syste is one of the fast, siple, easily adaptable and very cost effective. Alufor is one of the advanced forwork syste in which cast in place concrete facility can be efficiently constructed. The syste is so fast that have only the 7 to 10 days slab cycle, siple to use easily adaptable and very cost effective as total nuber of reuses the syste is ore and that can be around about repetitions under various conditions. One can construct all structural coponents such as slabs, beas, coluns, walls, stairs, and window hoods etc. using alufor. The syste provides soother coplete wall finish after the Deshuttering of structural eliinates and there is no need of wall plastering as we get direct paint finish surface. One can get Monolithic RCC load bearing construction facility fored by the continuous pouring of concrete in the walls and the slabs in the sae operation of construction. Excellent seisic resistant construction facility with considerably greater efficiency and appreciably sooth finish is achieved by using Alufor forwork syste. Due to this consistent and excellent concrete shapes and finishes are obtained on each floor of the facility. The prefabricated electrical and plubing coponents of good quality are used to increase the overall speed of construction as one knows the exact location and positions of all these coponents. Panels are kept in position by using siple stup pin wedge syste 3 4 Steel Slab 5 No of floors 6 Floor area 8,12, P+7 P sq 8,12,16,2 5,32 150, sq Table 5.2:- Cost analysis of aterial per unit CONT ENTS Concret ing Reinfor ceent Shutteri ng (Woode n) (Mild Steel) Brickw ork Plaster CONVE NTIO- NAL BUILDI NG 1400/sq. 1480/sq. 80/Sq /Sq. 525/sq. 1487/Sq. MIVAN TECHNO LOGY 1505/sq. 2115/sq /Sq. 0 0 COST SAVI NGS - 105/sq /sq /Sq. 525/sq. 1487/S q. FIG 4.1: - Construction using ivan technology S R. N O. V. ANALYSIS AND RESULT Table 5.1: - Details aterial used CONTE NT 1 Concrete grade 2 Thicknes s of wall MIVAN M15,M20,M ,160 CONVEN TIONAL M15,M25, M40 160,20 0,230 Total Analysis Of Cost Using Mivan technology Cost of foundation of building = Cost of P+7 floor of area Sq= Total cost of building= Using Conventional technology Cost of foundation of building = Cost of P+7 floor of area Sq= Total cost of building= DOI: / P a g e

4 Table 5.3: - Duration using ivan technology Sr. Activity No. of no days 1 All Shuttering 18 2 Conceal electrification 18 & plubing 3 Steel Reinforceent 6 4 Alignent checking 3 5 Buffer tie 2 6 Concrete placing 3 7 Reoval of Vertical forwork 2 8 Reoval of Other 14 forwork 9 Lifting of wall panels 2 10 Gypsu plastering & 30 painting etc TOTAL 98 FIG 5.4: - Duration using conventional techniques Sr. no ACTIVITY No. of days 1 Colun shuttering 12 2 Colun steelreinforceent 12 3 Buffer 2 4 Bea & slab 15 shuttering 5 Bea & slab steel 12 placing 6 Leveling 3 7 Concrete placing 6 8 Reoval of 15 forwork 9 Brickwork Plastering Finishing 30 Total 167 VI. RESULT Graph 6.1: Coparison of duration Using the ivan technology the total duration required of finishing P+7 storey building is 98 days and using conventional techniques the total duration required for coplication of P+7 storey building is 167 days. So the total tie saving is 69 days. Graph 6.1: Coparison of duration Graph 6.1: Coparison of cost Using the ivan technology the total cost of P+7 storey building is and by using conventional techniques the total total cost of P+7 storey building is So the total cost saving is VII. CONCLUSION It is concluded that construction facilities built by by using the ivan forwork technology is quite cheaper than the Conventional Method and total cost saving is nearly about 12.5 percent. This technology also enables us in saving considerable aount of tie in construction of high rise building. Also, any of the finishing works is saved in using Mivan technology which includes plastering (both internal and external), brickwork etc. Monolithic casting of the structural ebers at one pour saves appreciable tie and increases strength and durability of the structure. The advantages of ivan technology include higher durability of aterial, unifor quality of construction, low aintenance of forwork syste and faster copletion of activities. Whereas the drawbacks are high initial cost, structural syetry is required and requireent of skilled labour at every stage of construction. REFERENCES Journal Papers: [1]. Swapnali M. Karke1, M.B. Kuathekar - Coparison of theuse of Traditional and Modern Forwork Systes. Civil Engineering Systes and Sustainable Innovations. [2]. Pawar Sandip, P.M. Atterde Coparative Analysis of Forwork In Multistory Building nternational Journal Of Research In DOI: / P a g e

5 Engineering And Technology, Volue 03, Special issue: 09 [3]. ArbazKazi and Fauwaz Parkar (Dec 2015) Coparative study and decision aking for forwork technique to be adopted on construction site in Mubai IJRET Volue; 04 Issue; 12 Dec 2015 Books: [4]. Larson & turbo building structure copetency centre, Hand Book on Foundation, Forwork, Rebar & Concrete. Akshay Gulghane "Tie and Cost Optiization of Construction Project Using Mivan Technology "International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), vol. 8, no.8, 2018, pp DOI: / P a g e