TEST REPORT No

Transcription

1 Istituto Giordano S.p.A. Via Gioacchino Rossini, Bellaria-Igea Marina (RN) - Italia Tel Fax istitutogiordano@giordano.it - PEC: ist-giordano@legalmail.it Cod. Fisc./Part. IVA: Cap. Soc i.v. R.E.A. c/o C.C.I.A.A. (RN) Registro Imprese di Rimini n TEST REPORT No Place and date of issue: Bellaria-Igea Marina - Italia, 31/05/2018 Customer: Q-RAILING EUROPE GmbH & Co. KG - Marie Curie Straße, D EMMERICH AM RHEIN - Germany Date test requested: 16/02/2018 Order number and date: 75785, 16/02/2018 Date sample received: 24/04/2018 Test date: from 03/05/2018 to 04/05/2018 Purpose of test: resistance to horizontal static loading and resistance to dynamic loading according to standard UNI 11678:2017 of glass railing without handrail Test site: Istituto Giordano S.p.A. - Strada Erbosa Uno, Gatteo (FC)- Italia Origin of sample: sampled and supplied by the Customer Identification of sample received: No. 2018/0931 Sample name* The test sample is called. (*) according to that stated by the Customer Comp. MB Revis. AB This test report consist of 13 sheets. This document is the English translation of the test report No dated 31/05/2018 issued in Italian; in case of dispute the only valid version is the Italian one. Date of translation: 31/05/2018. CLAUSES: This document relates only to the sample or material tested and shall not be reproduced except in full without Istituto Giordano s written approval. Sheet 1 of 13

2 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 2 of 13 follows Description of sample* The test sample consists of 4 types of glass railings without handrail. The 3 types of railing, with the same support structure xx secured only to the floor but different glazings, have the characteristics reported in the following table. Railing type Type of glazing Overall dimensions Glass pane dimensions tempered glass 10 mm PVB 1,52 mm hardened glass 10 mm tempered glass 8 mm Trosifol 0,76 mm tempered glass 8 mm tempered glass 10 mm PVB 1,52 mm hardened glass 10 mm tempered glass 8 mm Trosifol 0,76 mm tempered glass 8 mm width height width height [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] Further details of sample specifications can be seen in Customer-supplied schematic drawing shown in the following sheet. (*) according to that stated by the Customer

3 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 3 of 13 follows LOWER SECTION KEY Symbol 1 Rubber 2 Glass 3 Fascia profile 4 Inlay 5 Disc Description

4 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 4 of 13 follows Photograph of railing. Normative references The test was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the following documents: UNI 11678:2017 del 11/05/2017 Vetro per edilizia - Elementi di tamponamento in vetro aventi funzione anticaduta - Resistenza al carico statico lineare ed al carico dinamico - Metodi di Prova ( Building glass - Glass infill elements with anti-fall function - Resistance to linear static load and to dynamic load Test methods ); D.M. Infrastrutture (Ministry of Infrastructures Decree) dated 17/02/2018 Norme Tecniche per le costruzioni ( Technical standards for construction ), published in the Ordinary Supplement of Gazzetta Ufficiale (Official Journal) No. 42 dated 20/02/ General Series, limited to the test loads.

5 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 5 of 13 follows Test apparatus Resistance to linear static horizontal loading The following equipment was used to carry out the test: steel frame simulating actual mounting of the sample to the floor with pneumatic load devices (apparatus in-house identification code: EDI048); 3 Gefran electronic displacement transducers model PZ-34-S150, full scale 150 mm, (apparatus inhouse identification codes FT45/1, FT451/2 and FT45/3); AEP Transducers S.r.l. load cell, model TS, measure range N (apparatus in-house identification code:edi104) together with datareader model DFI ; tapered tip carbide hammer, mass 75 g; Mitutoyo Corporation measuring tape model TD-S551D , full scla 5,5 m (apparatus in-house identification code: FT364). Resistance to dynamic load The following equipment was used to carry out the test: tempered steel ball hard impactor complying with clause of standard UNI 11678:2017 (apparatus in-house identification code EDI009); semi-rigid double-tyre impactor complying with clause of standard UNI 11678:2017, total mass 50 kg, (apparatus in-house identification code EDI012); WÜRTH ITALIA levelling rod (apparatus in-house identification code EDI083); steel spherical template, diameter 100 mm.

6 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 6 of 13 follows Test method The test was performed using in-house detailed procedure PP083 in the version current at the date of testing, according to standard UNI 11678:2017 test method for group 1 functioning configuration, but using the book values of table 3.1.II Valori dei sovraccarichi per le diverse categorie di edifici ( Overload values for the different categories of buildings ) of D.M. Infrastrutture dated 17/02/2018. Each railing was only fixed inferiorly on the steel frame simulating the actual installation. Resistance to linear static horizontal loading. 3 transducers were placed on each railing to read the relative displacement of the top edge of the plate (two at the ends of the railing and one in the midpoint between them). The railing was then subjected to: 0,6 kn/m preload, equal to 30 % of serviceability limit load, per 5 min; removal of the preload and reset of the transducers to zero; application of the serviceability limit load, namely 2,0 kn/m, per 5 min, and record of the deformations under load; load removal and registration of residual deformation after 15 min; application of the ultimate limit load, namely 3,0 kn/m, per 5 min, and load removal; induced breakage of 1 glass pane subject directly to load; braking load namely 0,6 kn/m, equal to 30 % of serviceability limit load, after the breakage per 1 min. Dynamic load Each railing was subjected in a sequence to: hard body impact, mass 1 kg; semi-rigid body impact, mass 50 kg. All impacts were made by releasing the impactor so that it fell from a specified height with a pendulum movement and without initial velocity. The impactors were hung by an inextensible pendulum wire of negligible mass so that when at rest they made contact with the point of intended impact. After each impact, the impactors were prevented from hitting the railing again after bouncing.

7 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 7 of 13 follows Environmental conditions at the time of testing Room temperature (21 ± 2) C Relative humidity (63 ± 5) % Test observers. The following people attended the test: Samuel Hanna for Q-RAILING EUROPE GmbH & Co. KG. Test results Resistance to linear static horizontal loading serviceability limit condition Railing Step Load Deformation at the measuring point A B C [kn/m] [mm] [mm] [mm] Maximum allowed deformation [mm] Effect preload 0,6 // // // // no damage serviceability load 2,0 80,1 79,5 78,2 100 no damage load removal 0,0 0,32 0,4 0,6 10 no damage preload 0,6 // // // // no damage serviceability load 2,0 72,0 72,6 27,7 100 no damage load removal 0,0 0,3 0,3 0,3 10 no damage preload 0,6 // // // // no damage serviceability load 2,0 63,1 63,2 62,2 100 no damage load removal 0,0 2,1 2,1 2,0 10 no damage preload 0,6 // // // // no damage serviceability load 2,0 85,0 84,9 83,4 100 no damage load removal 0,0 1,3 1,4 1,3 10 no damage

8 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 8 of 13 follows Resistance to linear static horizontal loading ultimate limit condition Railing Ultimate load Time Effect [kn/m] [min] 3,0 5 no damage 3,0 5 no damage 3,0 5 no damage 3,0 5 no damage Resistance to linear static horizontal loading failure condition after induced breakage Railing Induced breakage Breaking load Time Effect glass pane directly subjected to load glass pane directly subjected to load glass pane directly subjected to load glass pane directly subjected to load [kn/m] [min] 0,6 5 no failure 0,6 5 no failure 0,6 5 no failure 0,6 5 no failure

9 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 9 of 13 follows Resistance to dynamic load hard body impact test Railing Impact area Drop height Impact energy Effect close to a constraint close to a constraint close to a constraint close to a constraint [mm] [J] no glass fragmentation no glass fragmentation no glass fragmentation no glass fragmentation

10 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) Photograph of a railing after hard body impact. sheet 10 of 13 follows

11 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 11 of 13 follows Resistance to dynamic load semi-rigid body impact test Railing Impact area Drop height Impact energy Effect along the bisector, 250 mm from the corner along the bisector, 250 mm from the corner along the bisector, 250 mm from the corner along the bisector, 250 mm from the corner [mm] [J]

12 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 12 of 13 follows Photograph of a railing after semi-rigid body impact.

13 (Test report No dated 31/05/2018) sheet 13 of 13 follows Findings According to the test performed, according to the results obtained and according to what indicated in D.M. Infrastrutture dated 17/02/2018 and in standard UNI 11678:2017, the test sample, comprising glass railings without handrail secured only by the bottomside, called and submitted by the company Q-RAILING EUROPE GmbH & Co. KG - Marie Curie Straße, D EMMERICH AM RHEIN - Germany, obtains the results given in the following tables. Test Normative reference Requirement Result* Static horizontal linear load Dynamic load with hard body Dynamic load with semirigid body UNI 11678:2017 and D.M. Infrastrutture dated 17/02/2018 (table 3.1.II) 2,0 kn/m Complies UNI 11678: mm Complies UNI 11678: mm Complies with the intended use indicated in table 5 of standard UNI 11678:2017 As required in point k) of paragraph 7 Rapporto di prova ( Test Report ) of standard UNI 11678: 2017, it is stated that: this report does not represent an assessment of suitability for use or a certificate of conformity of the product. The results obtained refer only to the sample tested and describe the behavior of the product in the specific test conditions. Test Technician: Dott. Andrea Bruschi Head of Security and Safety Laboratory Dott. Andrea Bruschi Chief Executive Officer... The original of this document consists of an electronic document digitally signed pursuant to the applicable Italian legislation.