PROJECT SPECIFIC ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD ASSESSMENT REPORT at

Transcription

1 PROJECT SPECIFIC ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD ASSESSMENT REPORT at FLORENCE MUNICIPAL CENTER 600 West 3 rd STREET, FLORENCE, CO Prepared For: Kyle Sandor Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Superfund, Brownfield s and Voluntary Cleanup Unit 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Building B Denver, CO C/O Alissa Schultz Prepared By: GHP Environmental + Architecture East 46 th Street, Suite 450 Denver, CO Date: June 5, 2018 GHP Project Number: GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Previous Investigations GHP Survey Results BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURE ASBESTOS SAMPLING LEAD PAINT SAMPLING CERTIFICATIONS REGULATORY REVIEW ASBESTOS LEAD-BASED PAINT SCREEN ACM BY LOCATION SUSPECT ACM MATERIALS TESTED, VERIFIED NON-ACM LEAD-BASED PAINT SCREEN ASBESTOS/LEAD ABATEMENT CONCEPTUAL BUDGET ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ESTIMATED COST CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDICES Appendix A GHP Sample Location Drawings GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

3 Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F GHP Asbestos Location Drawings Laboratory Analysis Results XRF Lead-Based Paints Report Homogenous Area Photo Log Certifications and Licenses GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

4 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Between February 12 and February 28, 2018, GHP Environmental + Architecture (GHP) conducted a project-specific asbestos and lead-based paint building inspection of the Florence Municipal Center located at 600 West 3 rd Street, Florence, Colorado The purpose for the inspection was to identify the presence or absence of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) that may exist and be impacted by the Town of Florence engineering staff during the redevelopment projects associated with the facility located at 600 West 3 rd Street, Florence, CO The property rests on 2.9 acres and consists of two different building constructed at different times. The St. Josephs manor side of the building was constructed in 1932 as Colonial Farms chicken hatchery and operated until 1948 when it was given to Holy Cross Abbey and Benedictine Order for conversion into a hospital. In 1967 a second hospital wing was added (where current city offices now sit). Financial troubles resulted in conversion to a long term nursing home in 1984 and the entire facility was closed in In 2005/6 the City relocated offices to the newer (1967) wing and closed the 1932 wing. The newer wing houses city functions: City council chambers, police, all city departments, state patrol office, and other limited rentable space. The original 1932 building is currently vacant. (2017, Sandor, CDPHE). 1.1 Previous Investigations In 2004, Dan Ogden Consulting performed an asbestos investigation. Results of the investigation identified floor tile and associated black mastic, white fibrous insulation covering the joints, fittings, and insulation patches of all domestic water and hydronic piping. The investigation also determined the plaster in the 1932 Manor Building to contain trace amounts of ACM. This information is included in the Revised Report-Asbestos Investigation Florence Municipal Center conducted in November 2004 and April 2005 by Dan Ogden Consulting (2005, Ogden). At the time of the 2004 inspection, there was concern for the safety of the building inspector in regards to the accessibility of the basement in the 1932 manor side of the building due to significantly damaged flooring material that had previously been identified as ACM in the Revised Report-Asbestos Investigation Florence Municipal Center conducted in November 2004 and April 2005 by Dan Ogden Consulting (2005, Ogden). 1.2 GHP Survey Results GHP determined the following building materials to be ACM: 1) Homogenous Area (HA) 6-12 x12 Tan Floor Tile with Black Mastic 2) HA x12 Tan with Brown Dots Floor Tile on Black Mastic Manor Side Building 3) HA 26 9 x9 Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic 4) HA 27 9 x9 Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic 5) HA 28 9 x9 Beige Floor Tile with Black Mastic 6) HA 29 Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic. Visual representations of these materials can be found in Appendix E- Homogenous Area Photo Log. Weecycle Environmental determined there to be lead-based paint on the interior and exterior of the building in the following locations: GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 1

5 1) Door, Door Casing (Wood, Grey) Basement Utility Room 2) Door, Door Casing (Wood, ) Basement Utility Room 3) Window Casing (Metal, Grey) Basement Utility Room 4) Door (Metal, ) Basement Hallway 1 5) Wall (Concrete, Beige) Basement Room 1 6) Window Casing (Wood, Blue) 1st Floor Room 15, 1st Floor Room 38 7) Window Casing (Metal, ) 1st Floor Room 22 8) Window Casing (Wood, Beige) 1st Floor Room 36 9) Door (Metal, Grey) 1st Floor Room 40 10) Wall (Stucco, ) Exterior 1st Floor, Assume all Exterior Walls positive for Lead-based Paint 11) Door 2 (Wood, ) Exterior 1st Floor 12) Window Frame (Metal, ) Exterior 1st Floor Workers must use the proper work practices per the EPA Renovation Repair and Painting rule (RRP 2008) and OSHA regulations prior to removal of these building materials. These building materials must be removed by a certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC) prior to any planned removal/disturbance. 2.0 BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURE 2.1 ASBESTOS SAMPLING Bulk samples were collected by GHP of accessible suspect ACM in the specified areas per the EPA and OSHA asbestos inspection regulations. Bulk samples were given unique alpha-numeric identification numbers. The first set of numbers identifies the material s homogeneous area. A homogeneous area is defined as an area where the ACM or suspected ACM is uniform in color, texture and date of application. The second group of numbers represents the sequential sample acquired in each homogeneous area for a project. A description of each bulk sample and the sample location has been included. Sample locations (SL) and laboratory results are presented in Appendix A (SL) and Appendix C (laboratory analysis results). Bulk asbestos samples were randomly collected from homogenous areas of suspect ACM by Benjamin Lopez, an EPA/State of Colorado certified asbestos inspector. All bulk samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL), a third party independent laboratory. EMSL is accredited through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and participates in the NIST National Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP) as required by EPA. Bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in general compliance with guidelines established by the US EPA (40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A). Asbestos concentrations were visually estimated and/or point counted and reported in percent for each layer of the sample. 2.2 LEAD PAINT SAMPLING Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed this inspection according to the most current HUD guidelines. On-site testing of painted surfaces for lead content was completed using a portable Niton XLp- 300A Spectrum Analyzer Lead Detector (Serial Number 95970) which utilizes X-Ray Fluorescence analysis. Lead-based paint testing was performed in accordance with HUD Guidelines as revised 11/97 with the following procedural notes: GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 2

6 1) Room equivalents are generally listed by number, starting with the 1 st room of the main entrance and proceeding clockwise on each floor. Walls are listed in each room by letter with wall A facing the street of address, proceeding clockwise to B, C, D, etc. Multiple components (i.e. windows or doors) are listed moving left to right along each wall. 2) Substrates are labeled as Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Plaster, Stucco, Wood or Metal. Concrete block or cinder block or CMU are labeled concrete. Wallpapered surfaces are examined by XRF for concealed lead-based paints with postulated substrates. 3.0 CERTIFICATIONS The following representative of GHP Environmental + Architecture performed the EPA AHERA asbestos inspection: Name of Asbestos Inspector: Ben Lopez Signature EPA Accreditation No.: 08/16-BI-GHP06 State of Colorado Accreditation No.: The following representative of Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc. performed the Lead paint sampling inspection: Name of Colorado Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspector: Chris Schiechl State of Colorado Accreditation No.: REGULATORY REVIEW 4.1 ASBESTOS EPA (1986, 2011) and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) regulate all building materials that contain greater than 1% asbestos as determined through polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis. OSHA (1994, 1995) regulates all building materials that contain smaller amounts of asbestos (even trace concentrations by PLM). EPA and CDPHE Regulation No. 8, Part B (CDPHE 2008a), requires that suspect ACM in buildings built prior to 1988 be assumed to be asbestos containing or that an inspection be conducted by an EPA accredited/cdphe licensed asbestos building inspector. CDPHE, Regulation No. 8, Part B, requires an asbestos inspection following the AHERA (1986) protocol be conducted prior to demolition or remodeling activities that could disturb ACM. GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 3

7 The EPA and CDPHE require all friable and non-friable ACMs be removed prior to renovation activities that may disturb the ACM, and all friable ACM must be removed prior to demolition. In some circumstances, point count analysis is required for bulk samples previously analyzed by PLM. Point counting is a more detailed means of analysis than standard PLM. Federal and State agencies define ACM as materials containing greater than 1% asbestos. CDPHE Regulation No. 8, Part B, Section III.A.1.c., states that if the asbestos content of a sample of friable asbestos is estimated to be 1% asbestos or less, but greater than 0%, by a method other than point counting, the determination shall be repeated using the point counting technique with polarized light microscopy. If a results obtained by point count is different from a results obtained by visual estimation, the point count results must be used. (CDPHE 2008a). 4.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT SCREEN The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 16 C.F.R (USCPSC 2008), declares that paint and similar surface-coating materials for consumer use that contain lead or lead compounds and in which the lead content (calculated as lead metal) is in excess of 0.06 percent (0.06 percent is reduced to percent effective August 14, 2009 as mandated by Congress in section 101(f) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 of the weight of the total nonvolatile content of the paint or the weight of the dried paint film which paint and similar surface-coating materials are referred to hereafter as leadcontaining paint ) are banned hazardous products under Sections 8 and 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2057, The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines LBP as any paint, varnish, stain or other coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 (milligram per square centimeter) or 0.5 percent by weight (HUD 2012). However, even if lead concentrations below these levels are detected in paint, disturbing the paint may cause the potential problem of lead poisoning. State and local definitions of LBP may differ from HUD's definition (HUD 2012). Users must follow the most stringent of the federal, state and local regulations. In 1993, The OSHA established a standard addressing airborne lead exposure to employees in the construction industry. OSHA Lead Exposure in Construction (2004) standard applies to the disturbance or demolition of components that contain lead in measurable quantities and is based on airborne concentrations of lead generated during construction activities rather than on the concentration of the lead in paint or other material. Therefore, the employee protection and safety precautions as outlined by CFR must be initiated if any paint which contains lead in measurable quantities is physically disturbed during demolition or renovation activities. CFR applies to construction activities where an employee may be exposed to lead. This includes but is not limited to the following: Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead is present. Removal or encapsulations of materials containing lead. New Construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof that contain lead, or materials containing lead. The regulation states that where lead-containing coatings or paint are present, an initial employee exposure assessment must be conducted when any of the following activities take place: GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 4

8 Manual demolition of structures Manual scraping or sanding Heat gun applications Power Tool Cleaning Abrasive blasting Welding Cutting Torch burning The employee exposure assessment includes air monitoring for airborne lead levels above the action level of 30 micrograms/cubic meter or permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms/cubic meter. During employee exposure assessment, the employer is required to implement the following protective measures: 1. Appropriate respiratory protection designed for airborne lead levels up to at least ten times the permissible exposure limit (PEL). 2. Personal protective clothing. 3. Clean change areas equipped with separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and street clothes. 4. Hand washing facilities. 5. Initial biological monitoring in the form of employee blood sampling. 6. Lead hazard training. In addition, the regulation requires engineering and work practice controls, written compliance programs, and medical surveillance of employees. If any materials coated with lead-containing paint are scheduled for waste disposal, a waste characterization must be performed to determine the appropriate disposal requirements as regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Waste characterization includes sample collection and analysis using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) method as outlined by EPA. Material must be considered toxic waste and disposed of in the appropriate manner if the TCLP results in extraction of lead above five parts per million. A CDPHE a regulation does apply to apartment buildings. Apartment buildings are defined as target housing under Regulation No. 19, Lead-Based Paint Abatement (CDPHE 2008b) Any LBP abatement performed in target housing would be regulated by Regulation No. 19. Common renovation activities such as sanding, cutting, and demolition can create hazardous lead dust and chips by disturbing lead-based paint, which can be harmful to adults and children. To protect against this risk, on April 22, 2008, EPA issued a rule requiring the use of lead-safe practices and other actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning. The rule is called Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Program rule. The rule is also referred to as the RRP Rule. Under the rule, beginning April 22, 2010, contractors, owners and owner representative and property managers performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be certified and must follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination. GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 5

9 EPA requires that firms performing renovation, repair, and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in pre-1978 homes, child care facilities and schools be certified by EPA and that they use certified renovators who are trained by EPA-approved training providers to follow lead-safe work practices. Individuals can become certified renovators by taking an eight-hour training course from an EPA-approved training provider (EPA 2008). Contractors must use lead-safe work practices and follow these simple procedures including but not limited to; Contain the work area. Minimize dust. Clean up thoroughly. Beginning in December 2008, the rule requires that anyone that is paid to perform work that disturbs paint in housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 provide to owners and occupants of child care facilities and to parents and guardians of children under age six that attend child care facilities built prior to 1978 the EPA lead hazard information pamphlet Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers, and Schools. The rule affects paid renovators who work in pre-1978 housing and child-occupied facilities, including: Renovation contractors Maintenance workers in multi-family housing Painters and other specialty trades. Under the rule, child-occupied facilities are defined as residential, public or commercial buildings where children under age six are present on a regular basis. The requirements apply to renovation, repair or painting activities. The rule does not apply to minor maintenance or repair activities where less than six square feet of lead-based paint is disturbed in a room or where less than 20 square feet of lead-based paint is disturbed on the exterior. Window replacement is not minor maintenance or repair. Previously, owner-occupants of homes built before 1978 could certify that no child six years of age or younger or pregnant woman was living in the home and "opt-out" of having their contractors follows leadsafe work practices in their homes. On April 23, 2010, to better prevent against lead paint poisoning, EPA issued a final rule to apply lead-safe work practices to most pre-1978 homes, effectively closing the exemption. The rule eliminating the opt-out provision became effective July 6, Since the RRP Rule became effective on April 22, 2010, concerns have been raised by the regulated community regarding difficulties experienced in obtaining the rule required firm certification and renovation worker training. Acknowledging those concerns and to facilitate the transition to full implementation of the RRP Rule, EPA will offer additional and sufficient time for renovations firms and workers to obtain the necessary training and certifications to comply as follows: Until October 1, 2010, EPA will not take enforcement action for violations of the RRP Rule s firm certification requirement. For violations of the RRP Rule s renovation worker certification requirement, EPA will not enforce against individual renovation workers if the person has applied to enroll in, or has enrolled in, by not GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 6

10 later than September 30, 2010, a certified renovator class to train contractors in practices necessary for compliance with the final rules. Renovators must complete the training by December 31, ACM BY LOCATION Laboratory analysis of the asbestos bulk samples collected from the Florence Municipal Center in the Town of Florence determined that the following materials tested contain asbestos. VERIFIED ACM Homogenous Sample Area Nos. Material Description Asbestos Content Condition x12 Tan Floor Tile with Tan Floor Tile = 8% Good Black Mastic Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile x12 Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic Tan with Brown Dot Floor Tile = 7% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Good x9 Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic x9 Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic x9 Tan/ Floor Tile with Black Mastic 29 1 Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic 1932-Roof-1 1 Four (4) Layers Total Two (2) Duro Last Two(2) Torch Hot Fire Chrysotile Green Floor Tile = 10% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile Black Floor Tile = 8% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile Tan Floor Tile = 8% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile Thermal System Insulation = 6% Chrysotile Silver Paint = 2% Chrysotile Felt = 30% Chrysotile Significantly Damaged Significantly Damaged Significantly Damaged Good Good Additionally, the plaster in the 1932-aged portion of the building and identified by Dan Ogden Consulting (2005) as containing trace (<1% asbestos), while not an ACM, must be handled in accordance with OSHA regulations in the event of any planned disturbance. 6.0 SUSPECT ACM MATERIALS TESTED, VERIFIED NON-ACM The following suspect materials were tested as part of the asbestos inspection within the Florence Municipal Center located in the Town of Florence and determined to be non-acm: GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 7

11 Homoge nous Area Sample No. VERIFIED NON-ACM Material Description Asbestos Content Blue Cove Base with Mastic Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound x4 Fissured Ceiling Tile Hard Lid Ceiling Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound 5 1 Counter Caulking Plaster 8 1 Tan with Brown Spec Sheet Flooring with grey Backing on Black Mastic 9 1 Tan Cove Base with Yellow Mastic 10 1 Green with Black/ Specs 9 x9 FT on Yellow Mastic Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive 13 1 Blue 2 x2 Carpet Squares 14 1 /Beige 12 x12 FT with Blue Specs on Yellow Mastic 15 1 Dark Tan 12 x12 FT with Specs on Yellow Mastic 16 1 Counter Caulking 17 1 Grey Acoustical Sink Undercoat 18 1 Tan 12 x12 with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic 19 1 Green 12 x12 FT on Yellow Mastic 20 1 Black Cove Base with Tan Mastic 21 1 Red Cove Base with Tan Mastic x9 Ceiling Tile with Tan Adhesive 24 1 Grey Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing 25 1 Tan Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing Plaster GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 8

12 Homoge nous Area Sample No. VERIFIED NON-ACM Material Description Asbestos Content 31 1 Exterior Wall Material 32 1 Tan Window Sealant 7.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SCREEN If a color of paint was identified as lead containing ( 0.5% by weight) paint, then other surfaces with the same paint also contain lead and must be addressed by an RRP and OSHA lead safe abatement contractor. OSHA regulated paint (i.e., lead-containing paint) = >0.06% to 0.5% by weight. EPA & State of CO Regulated Lead-Based Paint (LBP) = > 0.5% by weight. The following suspect paints were sampled and analyzed by Weecycle Environmental as part of the predemolition/renovation OSHA Lead Paint Screen at the Florence Municipal Center located in the Town of Florence and were determined to be LBPs according to CDPHE regulations. EPA & State of CO Regulated Lead-Based Paint (LBP) = > 0.5% by weight. 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbell Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC (mg/cm2) 14 DOOR WOOD D GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive 5 15 DOOR CASING WOOD D GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive DOOR WOOD A WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive DOOR CASING WOOD A WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive WNDW CASING METAL A GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive DOOR METAL B WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Positive WALL CONCRETE D BEIGE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Positive WALL CONCRETE D BEIGE ROOM 3 3 BASEMENT Positive WNDW CASING WOOD C BLUE ROOM FIRST Positive WNDW CASING METAL B WHITE ROOM FIRST Positive WNDW CASING WOOD C BEIGE RM FIRST Positive WNDW CASING WOOD C BLUE RM FIRST Positive DOOR METAL B GREY RM FIRST Positive WALL STUCCO B WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive DOOR 2 WOOD B WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive WNDW FRAME METAL B WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive WALL STUCCO A WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive WALL STUCCO C WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive 1.3 GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 9

13 The following suspect paints were sampled and analyzed as part of the pre-demolition/renovation OSHA Lead Paint Screen at the Florence Municipal Center located in the Town of Florence and were determined to be lead containing paint. OSHA regulated paint (i.e., lead-containing paint) = >0.06% to 0.5% by weight. 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbell Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC (mg/cm²) 23 WALL CONCRETE A C WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE C L WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR METAL D WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING WOOD A WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative DR. JAMB 4 WOOD A WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING METAL B WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING 1 WOOD C WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE D BEIGE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Null WNDW CASING METAL C BLACK ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative WNDW CASING METAL C WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative CLST DR CASING WOOD B WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING WOOD A WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE D BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative DOOR WOOD B WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING WOOD B WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative DR. JAMB WOOD C WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A R WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A C WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A L WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B1 WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B2 WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD B3 WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD B4 YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD C R YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD C C YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD C L WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING WOOD B YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WNDW FRAME METAL C SILVER ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Null WALL CONCRETE A WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative WNDW FRAME METAL A WHITE ROOM 7 10 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE D YELLOW ROOM 7 10 BASEMENT Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE C BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative 0.16 GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 10

14 92 WALL CONCRETE D BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative DOOR METAL BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE C L YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative DOOR CASING WOOD A WHITE STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE AC WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative DOOR CASING 1 WOOD A WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative DOOR CASING 2 WOOD A BLACK HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative CEILING CONCRETE BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative DOOR CASING WOOD A WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST DR CASING WOOD A BLACK ROOM FIRST Negative WALL DRYWALL B WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative BASEBOARD WOOD B WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative CHAIR RAIL WOOD C GREY ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D BLACK FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C GREEN FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D GREY 26x7 28 FIRST Negative CLST SHELF WOOD B WHITE FIRST Negative 0.1 SPRT 180 WALL WOOD B BLUE RM FIRST Negative DOOR CASING WOOD B WHITE RM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D GREY RM FIRST Negative DOOR WOOD D GREY RM FIRST Negative WALL BRICK B WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative WALL FIBER BOARD B WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative CEILING FIBER BOARD WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative 0.23 The following suspect paints were sampled and analyzed as part of the pre-demolition/renovation OSHA Lead Paint Screen at the Florence Municipal Center located in the Town of Florence and were determined to contain traces of lead. 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbell Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No 8 9 COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE COLOR ROOM TYPE WALL CONCRETE A BEIGE UTILITY ROOM WALL BRICK B GREY UTILITY ROOM RM# FLOOR Results PbC (mg/cm²) 1 BASEMENT Negative BASEMENT Negative 0.04 GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 11

15 10 WALL BRICK C SILVER UTILITY 1 BASEMENT Negative 0.01 ROOM 21 CEILING CONCRETE WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A L WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE C C WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING METAL D WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING METAL B WHITE HALLWAY 2 BASEMENT Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE A BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative WNDW FRAME METAL C BLACK ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE C WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative WALL CONCRETE D WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative WNDW FRAME WOOD C WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative DOOR METAL A BLACK ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative DOOR METAL A BEIGE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative CEILING CONCRETE WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WALL WOOD D YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative WNDW FRAME METAL C WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative DOOR CASING METAL B GREY STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C R YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative WALL DRYWALL D YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative DOOR METAL D GREY STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative CEILING CONCRETE YELLOW HALLWAY 13 FIRST Null CEILING CONCRETE YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative CEILING CONCRETE BEIGE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A R WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A L WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C R WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C C WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C L WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative DOO1 WOOD A ORANGE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative DOOR 2 WOOD A GREEN HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative DOOR 3 WOOD A BEIGE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 12

16 130 DOOR 4 WOOD A PURPLE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative DOOR 2 WOOD C BLUE HALLWAY 14 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST DOOR WOOD A BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST SHELF WOOD A WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST SHELF SPRT WOOD A WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST DOOR WOOD A WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL WOOD C WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C GREY ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE D PURPLE ROOM FIRST Negative CLST SHELF WOOD B WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B RED ROOM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE HALLWAY6 22 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C WHITE HALLWAY6 22 FIRST Negative DOOR CASING WOOD D GREY FIRST Negative FLOOR TILE GREEN FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A GREY FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C BROWN FIRST Negative CEILING CONCRETE BEIGE HALLWAY 31 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE HALLWAY 31 FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE RM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE C WHITE RM FIRST Negative DOOR CASING WOOD B WHITE RM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE A WHITE RM FIRST Negative WALL CONCRETE B WHITE RM FIRST Negative ASBESTOS/LEAD ABATEMENT CONCEPTUAL BUDGET 8.1 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ESTIMATED COST ASBESTOS ABATEMENT CONCEPTUAL BUDGET HA# HA Material (ACM) Quantity Unit Price Est. Cost Est Total (ft²) ($ per ft²) ($) 6 12 X12 Tan Floor Tile with Black Mastic 5,000 Sq. Ft. $8 $40, x12 Tan with Brown Dots with Black Mastic 600 Sq. Ft. $8 $4, x9 Green Floor Tile on Black Mastic 2,100 Sq. Ft $8 $16,800 GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 13

17 27 9 x9 Green Floor Tile on Black Mastic 2,100 Sq. Ft $8 $16, x9 Green Floor Tile on Black Mastic 2,100 Sq. Ft $8 $16, Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic 400 Linear. Ft. $8 $3, Roof-1 Four (4) Layers Total Two (2) Duro Last Two(2) Torch Hot Fire 7,000 Sq. Ft. Assumed can be disposed as construction debris $0 Mobilization 1 $1,500 $1,500 TOTAL: $99,900 LBP ABATEMENT CONCEPTUAL BUDGET LBP Location Substrate Unit Cost Cost Estimate Total Interior DOOR and CASING WOOD $850 ea. $850 DOOR AND CASING WOOD $850 ea. $850 WINDOW CASING METAL $850 ea. $850 DOOR METAL $850 ea. $850 WALL (est 328 sf) CONCRETE $3.50/sf $1,148 WALL (est 88 sf) CONCRETE $3.50/sf $308 WINDOW CASING WOOD $850 ea. $850 WINDOW CASING METAL $850 ea. $850 WINDOW CASING WOOD $850 ea. $850 WINDOW CASING WOOD $850 ea. $850 DOOR METAL $850 ea. $850 Exterior WALL (est 3,152 sf) STUCCO $5/sf $15,760 DOOR 2 WOOD $850 ea. $1,700 GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 14

18 WNDW FRAME (36 windows) METAL $850 ea. $30,600 TOTAL: $57,176 If any materials coated with lead-containing paint are scheduled for waste disposal, a waste characterization must be performed to determine the appropriate disposal requirements as regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Waste characterization includes sample collection and analysis using the TCLP method. Material must be considered toxic waste and disposed of in the appropriate manner if the TCLP results in extraction of lead are in concentrations in excess of five parts per million. TCLP analysis typically costs $70-100/sample for the lab analysis. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GHP Environmental + Architecture makes the following conclusions and recommendations: This inspection sampling results have determined that the following material contain >1% asbestos: 1967 Construction: 12 x12 tan floor tiles with black mastic, as well as the white TSI with white mastic located throughout the basement of the 1967 construction Construction: 12 x12 tan with brown dots floor tile with black mastic located in corridor leading to building, 9 x9 green, beige, and black floor tile with black mastic located throughout the first and basement floors, as well as the white TSI with white mastic located throughout the 1932 construction. The plaster throughout the building is known to contain trace amounts of ACM. The inspection sampling results have also determined that the painted areas within Section 7.0 and the attached lead-in-paint sample locations contain OSHA regulated leaded paint and/or State of CO regulated LBP and must use proper work practices per RRP and OSHA regulations prior to or during renovation activities and/or structural demolition. Additionally GHP recommends that if demolition is planned then a sample of the identified LBP and associated waste stream be collected and analyzed via the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) method, as outlined by EPA, to determine whether the waste would be considered hazardous. The other option would be to abate the LBP prior to renovation activities and/or demolition. This suspect ACM inspection/testing event and report of findings is limited to the Florence Municipal Center located in Florence, Colorado. The report and findings should not be used to determine if building materials located outside of this scope of work contain asbestos. All other suspect ACMs present in this building, unless specifically tested as part of this sampling event, must be tested per EPA/CDPHE bulk sampling schemes and regulations. GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 15

19 This survey and report of findings is limited to the areas within the demolition scope at the Florence Municipal Center located in Florence, Colorado. The report and findings should not be used to determine if building materials located outside of this scope of work contain asbestos. All other suspect ACMs present in this building, unless specifically tested as part of this sampling event, must be tested per EPA/CDPHE bulk sampling schemes and regulations prior to structural demolition. If any materials coated with lead-containing paint are scheduled for waste disposal, a waste characterization must be performed to determine the appropriate disposal requirements as regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Waste characterization includes sample collection and analysis using the TCLP method. Material must be considered toxic waste and disposed of in the appropriate manner if the TCLP results in extraction of lead are in concentrations in excess of five parts per million. TCLP analysis typically costs $70-100/sample for the lab analysis. In the event additional suspect ACMs or leaded paint are encountered during renovation or demolition activities and those materials are not discussed in this report, no work should continue until the suspect ACMs and leaded paint are sampled and verified as non-acm and non-leaded paint by GHP. Sincerely, GHP Environmental + Architecture Ben Lopez Industrial Hygienist 10.0 REFERENCES AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. Public Law Number P.L , Major Amendment to Environmental Protection Agency s Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Control Act (TSCA). CDPHE. 2008a. Regulation No. 8, Part B- Asbestos, The Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants Part B Emission Standards for Asbestos, Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Denver, CO. CDPHE. 2008b. The Control of Lead Hazards (Reg CCR Part A II.B.46). Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Denver, Colorado GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 16

20 EPA Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Worker Protection Rule. Protection of Environment Asbestos. 40 CFR, Part 763. Washington, DC. NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. EPA. Washington, DC. Ogden, Daniel Revised Report-Asbestos Investigation Florence Municipal Center pp. 1 3, Revised Report-Asbestos Investigation Florence Municipal Center OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Construction Standards for Asbestos. 29 CFR Washington, DC. OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration, General Industry Standard. 29 CFR Washington, DC. OSHA Lead Exposure in Construction, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC. RRP Renovation, Repair, and Paint Rule. 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart E. EPA. Washington, D. C. Sandor, Kyle. LC-101/Town of Florence Work Order Request. CDPHE -HMWMD, 12 Sept USCPSC Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of CFR part USCPSC Washington, D. C GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com 17

21 APPENDIX A GHP SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWINGS GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

22 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 2-(1-7) Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound 4-(1-4) Hard Lid Ceiling- Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound 7-(1-7) Plaster 11-(1-7) Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected X-X = Sample contains greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction-Surfacing DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-SLD-SURFACING

23 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS N 1-West Side of Roof *One (1) Layer of ISO 2" *One (1) Layer of 1/2" Densdeck *Taper System 4" *One (1) Layer of Torch Down 2- Central Area of Roof *One (1) Layer of 1/2" Densdeck *3" Taper System *Two (2) Layer of ISO 2" 4-Roof 3- South Side of Roof *EPDM 45 mil *Taper System 4" *1/2" Densdeck *Two (2) Layer ISO 2" W 1-Roof 2-Roof E 4- North Side of Roof *One (1) Layer of 1/2" Densdeck *3" Taper System *Two (2) Layer of ISO 2" Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO Roof LEGEND S NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected X-X = Sample contains greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction - Roof DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-SLD-ROOF

24 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 1-(1-3) Blue Cove Base with Mastic (1-3) 2'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile 5-(1) Counter Caulking 6-(1-3) 12"x12" Tan Floor Tile (FT) with Black Mastic 8-(1) Tan with Brown Spec Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing 9-(1) Tan Cove Base with Yellow Mastic 10-(1) 9"x9" Green with Black/ Specs FT on Yellow Mastic 12-(1-3) Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive 13-(1) 2'x2' Blue Carpet Squares with Yellow Mastic 14-(1) 12"x12" /Beige with Blue Specs on Yellow Mastic 15-(1) 12"x12" Dark Tan FT with Specs on Yellow Mastic 16-(1) Counter Caulking (New) 17-(1) Grey Acoustical Sink Undercoat 18-(1) 12"x12" Tan FT on Yellow Mastic 19-(1) 12"X12" Green FT on Yellow Mastic 20-(1) Black Cove Base with Tan Mastic 21-(1) Red Cove Base with Tan Mastic Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND 21-1 NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected X-X = Sample contains greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-SLD-MISC

25 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 29-(1) - Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. Florence Municipal Court 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected LEGEND X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE X-X = Sample contains greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction BSMT DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-SLD-BSMT

26 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING 24-1 HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS (1) 12"x12" Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic (1) 9"x9" Ceiling Tile with Tan Adhesive 24-(1) Grey Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing 25-(1) Tan Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing 26-(1) 9"x9" Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic 27-(1) 9"x9" Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic 28-(1)9"x9" Tan/Beige Floor Tile with Black Mastic 30-(1-7) Plaster (1) Exterior Wall Material 32-(1) Tan Window Sealant NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO (POS) >1% Asbestos (NEG) No Asbestos Detected LEGEND X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: X-X = Sample contains *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor 1st Floor DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1932-SLD-1F

27 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING N HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 1-West Side of Roof *Two (2) Layers of Duro Last *Two (2) Layers of Torch Hot Tire 2- South Side of Roof *Two (2) Layers of Duro Last *Two (2) Layers of Torch Hot Tire W 1-Roof E Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO Roof LEGEND S NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content X-X = Sample Location REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected X-X = Sample contains greater than 1% ACM NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor Building - Roof DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1932-SLD-ROOF

28 APPENDIX B GHP ASBESTOS LOCATION DRAWINGS GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

29 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 22-(1) 12"x12" Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic 26-(1) 9"x9" Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic 27-(1) 9"x9" Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic 28-(1)9"x9" Tan/Beige Floor Tile with Black Mastic LEGEND = Location of HA-26, 27, 28-9"x9" Floor Tile on Black Mastic Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO = HA "x12" FT on Black Mastic NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content = HA Hard Elbow LEGEND TSI with Mastic is known to contain 6% Chrysotile Asbestos REVISIONS:: 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos Content NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor 1st Floor DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1932-ALD-1F

30 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING N HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 1- West Side of Roof *Two (2) Layers of Duro Last *Two (2) Layers of Torch Hot Tire 1-Roof W E Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND S NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content = HA Roof REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor Building - Roof DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1932-ALD-ROOF

31 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 6-(1-3) 12"x12" Tan Floor Tile (FT) with Black Mastic Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content X-X = HA #6 is known to exist in these REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected room = HA #6 may exist underneath current top layer NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction -1st FL ALD DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-SLD-MISC

32 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 29-(1) Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content = HA-29-Hard Elbow TSI with REVISIONS:: *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. 3. (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected Mastic is known to contain 6% Chrysotile Asbestos NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction-TSI DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-ALD-TSI

33 SAMPLES COLLECTED ON THIS DRAWING HOMOGENOUS AREAS (SAMPLE NUMBERS) & MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONS 29-(1) - Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic 6-(1-3) - 12"X12" Floor Tile with Black Mastic NOTES 1. Homogenous Areas identified above which are underlined and turned RED have greater than 1% Asbestos Content 2. Sample numbers on the drawing related to the homogenous areas above which contain greater than 1% asbestos have been turned RED as well. Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO (POS) >1% Asbestos 4. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected LEGEND *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE = HA-29-Hard Elbow TSI NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected with Mastic is known to contain 6% Chrysotile Asbestos = HA-6-12"x12" Floor Tile with Black Mastic is known to contain REVISIONS:: PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /2/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Construction BSMT DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1967-ALD-BSMT

34 Metal Door Rm 40 Window Casing Rm 38 Window Casing Rm 15 Window Casing Rm 36 Rm 23 Window Casing Exterior stucco and windows (36) Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND Identified LBP REVISIONS:: Locations *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /17/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor 1st Floor DRAWING NUMBER: TOF-1932-ALD-1F

35 Metal Door Utility Rm Rm 1 Wood doors, door casings metal window casing Concrete Wall Concrete Rm 3 Wall Hallway 1 Florence Municipal Center 600 West 3rd Street, Florence, CO LEGEND Identified LBP REVISIONS:: Locations *PLEASE PRINT THIS DRAWING IN COLOR *DRAWING NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1. (POS) >1% Asbestos 2. (NEG) No Asbestos Detected PROJECT NUMBER: DATE: DRAWN BY: /17/2018 Ben Lopez SHEET TITLE: Town of Florence Manor Basement DRAWING NUMBER:

36 APPENDIX C Laboratory Analysis Results GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

37 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Attention: Ben Lopez Phone: (303) Gobbell, Hays Partners Fax: (303) East 46th Street Received Date: 03/14/ :45 AM Suite 450 Analysis Date: 03/15/2018 Denver, CO Collected Date: 03/14/2018 Project: CDPHE Town of Florence Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 1-1-Cove Base Mastic A 1-2-Cove Base Mastic A 1-3-Cove Base Mastic A Blue Cove Base with Mastic - Central Conference Room Blue Cove Base with Mastic - Central Conference Room Blue Cove Base with Mastic - Break Room Blue Cove Base with Mastic - Break Room Blue Cove Base with Mastic - North Side of Building Blue Cove Base with Mastic - North Side of Building 2-1-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Conference Room Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-1-Tape A 2-1-Joint Compound B 2-1-Drywall C Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Conference Room Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Conference Room Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Conference Room 2-2-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-2-Tape A 2-2-Joint Compound B Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor Blue Blue Blue Beige Heterogeneous Fibrous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Fibrous 98% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 98% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 1 of 10

38 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 2-2-Drywall C Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor 2-3-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Break Room Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-3-Tape A 2-3-Joint Compound B 2-3-Drywall C Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Break Room Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Break Room Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Break Room 2-4-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - City Clerk Office Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-4-Drywall A Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - City Clerk Office 2-5-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Entrance Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-5-Drywall A Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Entrance 2-6-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - South Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-6-Drywall A Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - South Corridor 2-7-Texture Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - South Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 2-7-Drywall A Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - South Corridor Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Fibrous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/Pink Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous 15% Cellulose 98% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 60% Gypsum 25% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 70% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 2 of 10

39 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile - Central Conference Room 2'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile - Wade B. Office 2'x4' Fissured Ceiling Tile - Training Room 4-1-Texture 1 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-1-Texture 2 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, A Joint Compound - West Central Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-1-Drywall B Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Central Corridor 4-2-Texture Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Corridor Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-2-Tape A 4-2-Joint Compound B 4-2-Drywall C Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Corridor Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Corridor Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Central Corridor 4-3-Texture 1 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Above Break Room next to Conference Room Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-3-Texture 2 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, A Joint Compound - Above Break Room next to Conference Room Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis Gray/ Fibrous Gray/ Fibrous Gray Fibrous Heterogeneous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Fibrous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Heterogeneous 50% Cellulose 30% Min. Wool 45% Cellulose 35% Min. Wool 55% Cellulose 25% Min. Wool 15% Cellulose 95% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 15% Perlite 5% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Perlite 5% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 5% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 3 of 10

40 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 4-3-Tape B 4-3-Joint Compound C 4-3-Drywall D Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Above Break Room next to Conference Room Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Above Break Room next to Conference Room Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Above Break Room next to Conference Room 4-4-Texture 1 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Corridor Outside Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-4-Tape A Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Corridor Outside 4-4-Texture 2 Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, B Joint Compound - Corridor Outside Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 4-4-Joint Compound C 4-4-Drywall D Floor Tile Mastic A 6-2-Floor Tile Mastic A Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Corridor Outside Hard Lid Ceiling - Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Corridor Outside Counter Caulking - Break Room next to Conference Room 12"x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - Break Room next to Training 12"x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - Break Room next to Training 12"x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - Break Room next to Training 12"x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - Break Room next to Training Fibrous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Beige Fibrous Heterogeneous Beige Brown/ Fibrous Tan Black Tan Black 98% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 98% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 70% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 92% Non-fibrous (Other) 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 93% Non-fibrous (Other) 92% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type 8% Chrysotile 10% Chrysotile 7% Chrysotile 8% Chrysotile Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 4 of 10

41 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Asbestos % Type 6-3-Floor Tile "x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - North Side of Building Gray 94% Non-fibrous (Other) 6% Chrysotile 6-3-Mastic A 12"x12" Tan Floor Tiles with Black Mastic - North Side of Building Black 95% Non-fibrous (Other) 5% Chrysotile Plaster - Break Room next to Training Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis Heterogeneous 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) Plaster Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis Heterogeneous 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) Plaster Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis /Yellow Heterogeneous 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) Plaster Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis /Yellow Heterogeneous 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) Plaster Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis /Yellow Heterogeneous 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) 7-6-Skim Coat Plaster 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 7-6-Plaster A Plaster Tan 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 7-7-Skim Coat Plaster 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 7-7-Plaster A Plaster Tan 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 8-1-Flooring Tan with Brown Spec Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing on Black Mastic - Corridor and Office Gray/Tan Fibrous 20% Cellulose 5% Synthetic 2% Glass 73% Non-fibrous (Other) 8-1-Mastic A Tan with Brown Spec Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing on Black Mastic - Corridor and Office Black/Beige Heterogeneous 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 9-1-Cove Base Tan Cove Base with Yellow Mastic - Officers Bathroom Tan 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 9-1-Mastic A Tan Cove Base with Yellow Mastic - Officers Bathroom Tan 100% Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 5 of 10

42 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 10-1-Flooring Mastic A Green with Black/ Specs 9"x9" FT on Yellow Mastic - Officers Bathroom Green with Black/ Specs 9"x9" FT on Yellow Mastic - Officers Bathroom 11-1-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - City Prosecutor Office Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-1-Plaster Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint A Compound - City Prosecutor Office Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-2-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-2-Drywall A Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers 11-3-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-3-Drywall A Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers 11-4-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-4-Drywall A Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers 11-5-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Chamber Knee-Wall Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-5-Drywall A Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Chamber Knee-Wall Black/Green Tan Tan/ Heterogeneous Heterogeneous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/Gray Fibrous 15% Cellulose <1% Glass 15% Cellulose <1% Glass 15% Cellulose <1% Glass 15% Cellulose <1% Glass 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 5% Ca Carbonate 95% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 70% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 60% Gypsum 25% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 60% Gypsum 25% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 6 of 10

43 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 11-6-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-6-Drywall A Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - Council Chambers 11-7-Texture Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Entrance Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 11-7-Drywall A 12-1-Carpet Mastic A 12-1-Flooring B 12-2-Carpet Mastic A 12-2-Flooring B 12-3-Carpet Mastic A Floor Tile Mastic A 15-1-Floor Tile Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound - West Entrance Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - City Prosecutor Office Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - City Prosecutor Office Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - City Prosecutor Office Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - Council Chambers Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - Council Chambers Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - Council Chambers Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - Training Room Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive - Training Room 2'x2' Blue Carpet Squares - Break Room next to Detective Office 12"x12" FT /Beige with Blue Specs on Yellow Mastic - Patient Room 12"x12" FT /Beige with Blue Specs on Yellow Mastic - Patient Room 12"x12" Dark Tan FT with Specs on Yellow Mastic - Patient Room Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Brown/ Fibrous Blue/Purple Fibrous Yellow Gray Blue/Purple Fibrous Yellow Tan Blue Fibrous Tan Black/Blue Fibrous Yellow Gray 15% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 2% Glass 85% Synthetic 85% Synthetic 98% Synthetic 80% Synthetic 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 70% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Ca Carbonate 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 70% Gypsum 13% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 93% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type 7% Chrysotile Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 7 of 10

44 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 15-1-Mastic A Floor Tile Mastic A 19-1-Floor Tile Mastic A 20-1-Mastic Mud A 21-1-Cove Base Mastic A 22-1-Floor Tile Mastic A Flooring Mastic A 12"x12" Dark Tan FT with Specs on Yellow Mastic - Patient Room Counter Caulking (New) - Lab Bathroom Grey Acoustical Sink Undercoat - Lab Bathroom Tan 12"x12" FT on Yellow Mastic - Lab Front Desk Tan 12"x12" FT on Yellow Mastic - Lab Front Desk Green 12"x12" FT on Yellow Mastic - Lab Corridor Green 12"x12" FT on Yellow Mastic - Lab Corridor Black Cove Base with Tan Mastic - Lab Black Cove Base with Tan Mastic - Lab Red Cove Base with Tan Mastic - Patient Room in Lab Red Cove Base with Tan Mastic - Patient Room in Lab 12"x12" Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic - Older Building 12"x12" Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic - Older Building 9"x9" Ceiling Tile with Tan Adhesive - Older Building Grey Mozaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing - Older Building Tan Mozaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing - Older Building Tan Mozaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing - Older Building Yellow Gray Tan Yellow Green Yellow Tan Red Tan Tan Black Gray/ Fibrous Gray/Blue Fibrous Tan Fibrous Tan 45% Cellulose 35% Min. Wool 20% Cellulose 15% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 93% Non-fibrous (Other) 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Perlite 5% Non-fibrous (Other) 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type 7% Chrysotile 10% Chrysotile Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 8 of 10

45 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % 26-1-Floor Tile Mastic A 27-1-Floor Tile Mastic A 28-1-Floor Tile Mastic A Plaster Mastic A 30-3-Concrete B "x9" Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building 9"x9" Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building 9"x9" Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building 9"x9" Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building 9"x9" Beige Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building 9"x9" Beige Floor Tile with Black Mastic- Older Building Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Plaster- Older Building Exterior Wall Material- Older Building Tan Window Sealant- Older Building Green Black Black Black Brown Black Tan/ Fibrous Heterogeneous Tan Gray Tan/ 80% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 95% Non-fibrous (Other) 93% Non-fibrous (Other) 94% Non-fibrous (Other) 14% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Ca Carbonate 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Ca Carbonate 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) 100% Non-fibrous (Other) Asbestos % Type 10% Chrysotile 10% Chrysotile 10% Chrysotile 5% Chrysotile 7% Chrysotile 6% Chrysotile 6% Chrysotile Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 9 of 10

46 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: GOBB21 Customer PO: Project ID: Analyst(s) Amanda Lang (25) Gentry Catlett (21) Molly Elkins (83) Amanda Lang, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Denver, CO NVLAP Lab Code Initial report from: 03/16/ :28:28 ASB_PLM_0008_ Printed: 3/16/2018 9:28 AM Page 10 of 10

47

48

49

50 APPENDIX D XRF Lead-Based Paints Report GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

51 WEECYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC Commerce Court, Unit B 280 W Kagy Blvd., Suite D-259 Lafayette, Colorado Bozeman, MT (303) Fax (303) (406) March 23, 2018 Ben Lopez Gobbell Hayes Partners, Inc E 54 th Avenue, Suite J Denver, CO RE: Site Specific EPA/HUD - 40 CFR Subpart E Lead-Based Surface Coating Inspection at 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO (the Property) Dear Mr. Lopez: On February 12, 2018, Chris Schiechl, a Colorado Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspector from Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc., completed a full EPA/HUD Lead Based Surface Coatings Survey that satisfies the requirements for Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) 40CFR Subpart E, at the property. LBP and LBG (Lead-based Glaze) was identified on the tested surfaces at the Property. Non-painted surfaces such as unpainted ceramic tile and porcelain bathtubs may be a source of lead exposure during demolition or renovation. These items are not considered lead-based paint; their presence does not need to be included in disclosure under the Lead Disclosure Rule. Identifying Information Site Address 600 W 3 rd Street Florence, CO Constructed 1930 (rebuilt 1974) Owner City of Florence Owner Address 600 W 3 rd Street Florence, CO Weecycle Job Number Site Notes None Sampling Procedure Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc. completed this inspection according to the most current HUD guidelines. On-site testing of painted surfaces for lead content was completed using a portable Niton XLp-300A Spectrum Analyzer Lead Detector (Serial Number 95970) which utilizes X-Ray Fluorescence analysis. Gobbell Hayes 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Lead Based Paint Inspection

52 Lead Based Paint Testing is performed in accordance with HUD Guidelines as revised 11/97 with the following procedural notes: 1) Room equivalents are generally listed by number, starting with the 1 st room of the main entrance and proceeding clockwise on each floor. Walls are listed in each room by letter with wall A facing the street of address, proceeding clockwise to B, C, D, etc. Multiple components (i.e. windows or doors) are listed moving left to right along each wall. 2) Substrates are labeled as Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Plaster, Stucco, Wood or Metal. Concrete block or cinder block or CMU are labeled concrete. Wallpapered surfaces are examined by XRF for concealed lead-based paint with postulated substrates. In addition to on-site analysis, leaded dust wipes, bulk paint chip, and/or lead in soil samples of suspected surfaces may have been collected at the discretion of the risk assessor at the request of the contractor. These samples will be analyzed for lead content by Reservoirs Environmental Services, Inc., an AIHA ELLAP (Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program) approved laboratory. EPA, 40 CFR Subpart E, Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule: Under the rule, beginning in April 2010, contractors performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be certified and must follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination. All painted surfaces must be assumed positive for lead-based paint unless tested and confirmed to be negative. Target Housing is a home or residential unit built on or before December 31, 1977, except: Housing built for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless a child less than 6 years old lives or is expected to live in the house or unit); or Zero-bedroom dwellings (studio apartments, hospitals, hotels, dormitories, etc.) The EPA Renovate, Repair and Painting Rule defines a child- occupied facility as a pre-1978 building that meets all three of the criteria below: Visited regularly by the same child, under 6 years of age. The visits are on at least two different days within any week (Sunday through Saturday period), provided that each day s visit lasts at least 3 hours. Combined weekly visits last at least 6 hours, and the combined annual visits last at least 60 hours. Child-occupied facilities may be located in a public or commercial building or in target housing. These facilities include schools, child care facilities, and daycare centers. FEDERAL LEAD-BASED PAINT STANDARDS Paint Lead Based Paint is any paint or other surface coatings that contain at least: 1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm 2 ) of lead; 0.5 percent lead; or 5,000 parts per million lead by dry weight. Note: In 1978 the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned the residential use of leadbased paint that contained greater than or equal to 0.06 percent or 600 ppm of lead. Dust Federal Thresholds for Lead-Contamination (in micrograms per square foot) Floors 40 µg/ft² Interior window sills 250 µg/ft² Gobbell Hayes 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Lead Based Paint Inspection

53 Window troughs (Clearance only) 400 µg/ft² Soil Federal Thresholds for Bare Soil Contamination (in micrograms per gram; equivalent to parts per million) Play areas used by children under age µg/gram Other areas, if more than 9 ft² in total area of bare soil per property 1,200 µg/gram Abatement required by HUD 5,000 µg/gram Site Findings Lead-based paint (LBP) was identified on the interior and exterior of the building in the following location(s): A. Door, Door Casing (Wood, Grey) Basement Utility Room B. Door, Door Casing (Wood, ) Basement Utility Room C. Window Casing (Metal, Grey) Basement Utility Room D. Door (Metal, ) Basement Hallway 1 E. Wall (Concrete, Beige) Basement Room 1 F. Window Casing (Wood, Blue) 1 st Floor Room 15, 1 st Floor Room 38 G. Window Casing (Metal, ) 1 st Floor Room 22 H. Window Casing (Wood, Beige) 1 st Floor Room 36 I. Door (Metal, Grey) 1 st Floor Room 40 J. Wall (Stucco, ) Exterior 1 st Floor, Assume all Exterior Walls positive for Lead-based Paint K. Door 2 (Wood, ) Exterior 1 st Floor L. Window Frame (Metal, ) Exterior 1 st Floor Site-Specific Lead Hazard Control Plan Hazard A-L: Interior and Exterior surfaces covered in LBP. (See Above) Periodic visual monitoring of these surfaces by the Property s owner is required according to HUD guidelines. As they begin to degrade, either wet-strip and re-paint or encapsulate with non- LBP (please refer to the rest of this control plan for more details). If remodeling or renovation activities disturb these sites, adhere to the following procedure. Certified contractors are required to follow the applicable HUD, EPA, and OSHA Lead-in-Construction standards. When remodeling, renovation or painting activities have been completed a cleaning verification procedure or a final clearance (by dust wipe) should be performed to verify the work was completed properly. Based on the results of this analysis, please follow all applicable local, state, and federal regulations when disposing of this material. ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table 1. Summary of Positive XRF Readings Component XRF (window, door, wall, stair Sample # rail, etc.) Gobbell Hayes 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Lead Based Paint Inspection Location Side Lead Content, (mg/cm²) 14 Door Utility Room D 5 15 Door Casing Utility Room D Door Utility Room A Door Casing Utility Room A 1.5

54 XRF Sample # Component (window, door, wall, stair rail, etc.) Location Side Lead Content, (mg/cm²) 20 Window Casing Utility Room A Door Hallway B Concrete Basement, Room 1 D Concrete Basement, Room 1 D Window Casing 1 st Floor, Room 15 C Window Casing 1 st Floor, Room 23 B Window Casing 1 st Floor, Room 36 C Window Casing 1 st Floor, Room 38 C Door 1 st Floor, Room 40 B Wall 1 st Floor Exterior B Door 2 Exterior B Window Frame Exterior B Wall Exterior A Wall Exterior C 1.3 General Recommendations 1) A full re-survey is NOT recommended for surfaces that have already been tested. However, a re-survey is recommended for other interior and exterior painted surfaces as they begin to degrade and/or prior to any renovations or modifications. In addition, a reevaluation of surface with LBP should be completed. Please refer to the enclosed reevaluation schedule (located in the Appendices) for HUD s recommended timeline. 2) Painted surfaces should be inspected annually and repainted as needed before deterioration occurs. Before any scraping or sanding, the paint should be determined to be lead-based paint or non-lead-based paint and appropriate measures taken to prevent the generation or spreading of paint chips or dust. 3) Vegetation, mulch and ground cover should be inspected quarterly and annually renewed to cover the soil along the foundation of the buildings and grounds. The soil should NOT be disturbed, allowing lead-containing dust to be tracked into the house by residents or their pets. 4) Windows and doors in the building should be inspected annually for wear on friction surfaces, which may create lead dust. For doors, plane the edges of the door to eliminate friction. For windows, remove paint from window sash and friction frame. Seal lead-based paint waste in plastic bags and dispose properly, then wash surfaces with Tri-Sodium Phosphate (TSP). Collect and dispose of the wash water in compliance with local disposal requirements. With approval of waste regulators, wash water can be flushed into a sanitary sewer (toilet). 5) Please call for a re-survey of any surfaces which you wish to disturb for renovations, repair or demolition, especially disturbing a painted surface in the older portion of the building. You may want to hire a qualified LBP contractor and/or use LBP techniques to control dust. 6) Children residing or in day care at this site should be checked by their family physician annually for elevated blood lead levels and balanced diets should include foods which provide recommended daily amounts of calcium and iron. 7) When cleaning, use wet mopping with a general-purpose cleaner, rather than sweeping. For occasional vacuuming, use a HEPA rated vacuum. 8) Please contact Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc. for additional information. Gobbell Hayes 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Lead Based Paint Inspection

55 Enclosed are copies of the sampling data (i.e. XRF spectral data and/or laboratory analytical results), and relevant professional documents and certifications. If you have questions or require additional services, please call (303) or (800) Sincerely, Judith Sawitsky President Colorado Cert. No Gobbell Hayes 600 W 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Lead Based Paint Inspection

56 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 2 2/12/ :13 PAINT CALIBRATE Negative /12/ :16 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive 1 4 2/12/ :30 PAINT CALIBRATE Negative /12/ :34 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive 1 6 2/12/ :36 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative 0 7 2/12/ :37 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative 0 8 2/12/ :38 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT BEIGE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :38 PAINT WALL BRICK B INTACT GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :39 PAINT WALL BRICK C INTACT SILVER UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :40 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :40 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :41 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :41 PAINT DOOR WOOD D INTACT GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :42 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD D INTACT GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :43 PAINT FLOOR CONCRETE DETERIORATED GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :43 PAINT DOOR WOOD A DETERIORATED WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :44 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD A DETERIORATED WHITE UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :45 PAINT RAILING METAL A DETERIORATED GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :46 PAINT WNDW CASING METAL A DETERIORATED GREY UTILITY ROOM 1 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :50 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :50 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A L INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :51 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :51 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A R INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :52 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :53 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C L INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :54 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :55 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C R INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :55 PAINT WALL CINDER BLOCK - CMU D INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :55 PAINT DOOR METAL D INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :56 PAINT DOOR CASING METAL D INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :56 PAINT DOOR WOOD A INTACT VARNISH HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :57 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD A INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :57 PAINT DR. JAMB 4 WOOD A INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :58 PAINT DOOR METAL B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :58 PAINT DOOR CASING METAL B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :58 PAINT DOOR CASING METAL B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :59 PAINT DOOR CASING 1 WOOD C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 1 2 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :01 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative 0

57 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 40 2/12/ :01 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :01 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :02 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :02 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :03 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT BEIGE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :03 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT BEIGE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Null /12/ :04 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT BEIGE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Positive /12/ :04 PAINT WNDW CASING METAL C INTACT BLACK ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :05 PAINT WNDW CASING METAL C INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :05 PAINT CLST DR CASING WOOD B INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :06 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD A INTACT WHITE ROOM 1 3 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :10 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :11 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :12 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :12 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :13 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT BEIGE ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :13 PAINT WNDW FRAME METAL C INTACT BLACK ROOM 3 4 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :15 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :15 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :16 PAINT DOOR WOOD B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :16 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :16 PAINT DR. JAMB WOOD C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 2 5 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :18 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :18 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :19 PAINT WNDW FRAME WOOD C INTACT WHITE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :20 PAINT DOOR METAL A INTACT BLACK ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :21 PAINT DOOR METAL A INTACT BEIGE ROOM 4 7 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :23 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :23 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :24 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A R INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :24 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A C INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :25 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A L INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :26 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B1 INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :26 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B2 INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :27 PAINT WALL WOOD B3 INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :28 PAINT WALL WOOD B4 INTACT YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :29 PAINT WALL WOOD C R INTACT YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :29 PAINT WALL WOOD C C INTACT YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative -0.4

58 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 78 2/12/ :30 PAINT WALL WOOD C L INTACT WHITE ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :31 PAINT WALL WOOD D INTACT YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :31 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD B INTACT YELLOW ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :32 PAINT WNDW FRAME METAL C INTACT SILVER ROOM 5 8 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :34 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :34 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Null /12/ :34 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :34 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :35 PAINT WNDW FRAME METAL C INTACT WHITE ROOM 6 9 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :36 PAINT WNDW FRAME METAL A INTACT WHITE ROOM 7 10 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :36 PAINT WALL DRYWALL C DETERIORATED YELLOW ROOM 7 10 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :37 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D DETERIORATED YELLOW ROOM 7 10 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :38 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :39 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :39 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :41 PAINT DOOR METAL DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM 8 11 BASEMENT Negative /12/ :05 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive /12/ :06 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive /12/ :08 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive /12/ :11 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :12 PAINT WALL CONCRETE AL INTACT WHITE STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :12 PAINT WALL DRYWALL AC INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :13 PAINT WALL DRYWALL AR INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :13 PAINT WALL DRYWALL B INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :13 PAINT DOOR METAL B INTACT GREY STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :14 PAINT DOOR CASING METAL B INTACT GREY STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :15 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C L INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :15 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C C INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :16 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C R INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :16 PAINT WALL DRYWALL D INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :16 PAINT DOOR METAL D INTACT GREY STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :18 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT YELLOW HALLWAY 3 13 FIRST Null /12/ :19 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :19 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :20 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :20 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :21 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT YELLOW STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :21 PAINT DOOR METAL C INTACT BLUE STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative 0

59 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 116 2/12/ :21 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD A INTACT WHITE STAIRWELL 12 FIRST Negative /12/ :24 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT BEIGE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :25 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A R INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :25 PAINT WALL CONCRETE AC INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :26 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A L INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :26 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C R INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :27 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :27 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C L INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :28 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :28 PAINT DOO1 WOOD A INTACT ORANGE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :29 PAINT DOOR CASING 1 WOOD A INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :30 PAINT DOOR CASING 2 WOOD A INTACT BLACK HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :30 PAINT DOOR 2 WOOD A INTACT GREEN HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :30 PAINT DOOR 3 WOOD A INTACT BEIGE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :31 PAINT DOOR 4 WOOD A INTACT PURPLE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :32 PAINT DOOR 2 WOOD C INTACT BLUE HALLWAY 3 14 FIRST Negative /12/ :33 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :34 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :34 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :35 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D DETERIORATED BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :35 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A DETERIORATED WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :36 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D DETERIORATED WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :36 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD A DETERIORATED WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :37 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :37 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :38 PAINT WNDW CASING WOOD C INTACT BLUE ROOM FIRST Positive /12/ :39 PAINT CLST DR CASING WOOD A INTACT BLACK ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :39 PAINT CLST DOOR WOOD A INTACT BLUE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :39 PAINT CLST SHELF WOOD A INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :40 PAINT CLST SHELF SPRT WOOD A INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :41 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :42 PAINT WALL DRYWALL B INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :42 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :43 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :44 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :45 PAINT CLST DOOR WOOD A INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :45 PAINT WALL WOOD C INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :46 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD B INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative -0.2

60 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 154 2/12/ :47 PAINT CHAIR RAIL WOOD C INTACT GREY ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :47 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT GREY ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :48 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT PURPLE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :49 PAINT CLST DR CASING WOOD D INTACT PURPLE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :49 PAINT CLST SHELF WOOD B INTACT WHITE ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :50 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT RED ROOM FIRST Negative /12/ :52 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE HALLWAY6 22 FIRST Negative /12/ :52 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE HALLWAY6 22 FIRST Negative /12/ :54 PAINT WALL DRYWALL C INTACT WHITE FIRST Negative /12/ :54 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B DETERIORATED WHITE FIRST Negative /12/ :54 PAINT WNDW CASING METAL B DETERIORATED WHITE FIRST Positive /12/ :55 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD D DETERIORATED GREY FIRST Negative /12/ :56 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT BLACK FIRST Negative /12/ :56 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT GREEN FIRST Negative /12/ :57 PAINT FLOOR TILE INTACT GREEN FIRST Negative /12/ :59 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT GOLD FIRST Negative /12/ :00 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT GREY 26x7 28 FIRST Negative /12/ :02 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT GREY FIRST Negative /12/ :02 PAINT CLST SHELF SPRT WOOD B INTACT WHITE FIRST Negative /12/ :03 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT BROWN FIRST Negative /12/ :15 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE INTACT BEIGE HALLWAY 5 31 FIRST Negative /12/ :15 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE HALLWAY 5 31 FIRST Negative /12/ :16 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :17 PAINT WALL CONCRETE C INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :17 PAINT WNDW CASING WOOD C INTACT BEIGE RM FIRST Positive /12/ :20 PAINT WNDW CASING WOOD C INTACT BLUE RM FIRST Positive /12/ :20 PAINT WALL WOOD B INTACT BLUE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :21 PAINT DOOR CASING WOOD B INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :22 PAINT DOOR WOOD B INTACT ORANGE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :23 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :24 PAINT WALL CONCRETE D INTACT GREY RM FIRST Negative /12/ :25 PAINT DOOR METAL B INTACT GREY RM FIRST Positive /12/ :25 PAINT DOOR WOOD D INTACT GREY RM FIRST Negative /12/ :27 PAINT WALL CONCRETE A INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :27 PAINT WALL CONCRETE B INTACT WHITE RM FIRST Negative /12/ :28 PAINT DOOR METAL B INTACT GREY RM FIRST Negative /12/ :30 PAINT WALL STUCCO B DETERIORATED WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive /12/ :30 PAINT WALL BRICK B DETERIORATED WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative 0.06

61 600 W 3rd St. Florence,CO Old Nursing Home Gobbel Hays WEC# XRF Model# XLp300A Serial# Sourced: 7/1/2015 Inspector: Chris Schiechl Cert# Exp. 4/24/2018 Reading No Time Type COMPONENT SUBSTRATE SIDE CONDITION COLOR ROOM TYPE RM# FLOOR Results PbC 192 2/12/ :31 PAINT WALL FIBER BOARD B DETERIORATED WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative /12/ :31 PAINT DOOR 1 METAL B INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative /12/ :31 PAINT DOOR 2 WOOD B INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive /12/ :32 PAINT WNDW FRAME METAL B INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive /12/ :33 PAINT CEILING FIBER BOARD INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Negative /12/ :34 PAINT WALL STUCCO A INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive /12/ :35 PAINT WALL STUCCO C INTACT WHITE EXTERIOR FIRST Positive /12/ :38 PAINT CALIBRATE Negative /12/ :40 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive /12/ :41 PAINT CALIBRATE Positive 1

62 APPENDIX E Homogenous Area Photo Log GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

63 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 1 of 7 HOMOGENEOUS AREA PHOTO LOG Project Name: CDPHE Town of Florence Florence Municipal Center GHP Project No.: Project Address: 600 West 3 rd Street, Florence, CO Contact/Client: Kyle Sandor Work Area: Florence Municipal Center Date(s): February 27 th and 28 th, 2018 Note: HA = Area HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 1 Blue Cove Base with Mastic 2 Pink Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound 3 2 x4 Fissured Ceiling Tile 4 Hard Lid Ceiling Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound

64 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 2 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 5 Counter Caulking 6 Floor Tile = 7% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile 12 x12 Tan Floor Tile with Black Mastic 7 Plaster 8 Tan with Brown Spec Sheet Flooring with grey Backing on Black Mastic 9 Tan Cove Base with Yellow Mastic

65 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 3 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 10 Green with Black/ Specs 9 x9 FT on Yellow Mastic 11 Gypsum Board, Tape, Joint Compound 12 Blue/Purple Carpet with Yellow Adhesive 13 Blue 2 x2 Carpet Squares 14 /Beige 12 x12 FT with Blue Specs on Yellow Mastic

66 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 4 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 15 Dark Tan 12 x12 FT with Specs on Yellow Mastic 16 Counter Caulking 17 Grey Acoustical Sink Undercoat 18 Tan 12 x12 with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic 19 Green 12 x12 FT on Yellow Mastic

67 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 5 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 20 Black Cove Base with Tan Mastic 21 Red Cove Base with Tan Mastic 22 Floor Tile = 7% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile 12 x12 Tan with Brown Dots FT on Black Mastic 23 9 x9 Ceiling Tile with Tan Adhesive 24 Grey Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing

68 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 6 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 25 Tan Mosaic Sheet Flooring with Grey Backing 26 Floor Tile = 10% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 10% Chrysotile 9 x9 Green Floor Tile with Black Mastic 27 Floor Tile = 10% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 5% Chrysotile 9 x9 Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic 28 Floor Tile = 7% Chrysotile Black Mastic = 6% Chrysotile 9 x9 Tan/ Floor Tile with Black Mastic 29 Photo Not Available 6% Chrysotile Hard Elbow TSI with Mastic 30 Photo Not Available Plaster 31 Photo Not Available Exterior Wall Material

69 Photo Log P/SL Tower A, 1 st and 2 nd Floor ACM Survey March 14, 2018 Page 7 of 7 HA # Photo of Tested Material Asbestos Lab Results Material Description 32 Photo Not Available Tan Window Sealant 1-West Side Building #1 (1967) 1 Layer of ISO 2 1 Layer ½ Denstick Taper System 4 2-East Side Building #1 (1967) 1 Layer ½ Denstick 1 Layer 3 Taper System 2 Layer ISO 2 3-South Side Building #1 (1967) 1 Layer EPDM 45 Mil Taper System 4 1 Layer 1 ½ Denstick 1 Layer of ISO 2 4-Above Mech Room Building #1 (1967) 1 Layer ½ Denstick 1 Layer 3 Taper System 2 Layer ISO 2 1-West Side Building #2 (1932) Silver Paint = 2% Chrysotile Black Felt = 30% Chrysotile 2 DurLust Layers 2 Torch Hot Tire

70 APPENDIX G F Certifications and Licenses GHP Environmental + Architecture Nashville Denver San Antonio Jupiter San Francisco ghp1.com

71

72