Brenda O Brien, P.E. Engineer of Construction Field Services

Transcription

1 Brenda O Brien, P.E. Engineer of Construction Field Services

2 Providing the highest quality integrated transportation services for economic benefit and improved quality of life.

3 MDOT Demographics, Program, and Funding Statewide Consistency State Transportation Commission Changes Letting Statistics

4 Number of Employees , Year (1960 through 2011)

5 Total Miles of Roadway in Michigan State Trunkline 9655 miles County Roads 90,208 miles Municipal Streets 21,247 miles Total 121,110 miles

6 Highway Bridge Federal Definition - any structure 20 or longer that is used by the public 4,398 MDOT owned/maintained 6,567 local agency owned/maintained Total 10,965 highway bridges in Michigan

7 HMA - PCC - Year Tons of HMA Square Yards of Concrete Pavement Construction Program (total) ,057,364 3,009,385 $769,565, ,063,938 2,897,861 $742,247, ,496,767 1,586,734 $881,133, ,373,296 3,342,083 $953,131, ,375,975 2,459,956 $967,821, ,162,954 1,969,778 $878,851, ,211,179 2,459,956 $1,068,335, ,973,721 2,394,714 $749,900, ,309,046 1,513,581 $770,000, ,387,727 1,121,341 $619,300, ,196,563 1,091,677 $663,900,000

8 Pavement Condition of Federal Aid Eligible Roads Michigan Department of Transportation Pavement Program Investment Level vs. Actual Trunkline Pavement Condition $ % Investment Level in Millions $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 92% 92% 91% 91% 89% 89% 86% 87% 86% 82% 78% 75% 75% 73% 71% 69% 67% 64% $160 $180 $305 $326 $362 $444 $410 $518 $521 $610 $658 $624 $572 $665 $550 $447 $483 $416 55% * Investment Condition (percent good and fair) * Due to a change in reporting requirements, $60 M in work on trunkline pavement was 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% Percent Pavement in Good & Fair Condition 8

9 STATE STATE PROFILE (thousands) STATE INVESTMENT ALLOCATION (thousands) Registered Vehicles Lane Miles Total Funding Funding Per Population Annual VMT Funding Per Pop. Lane Mile MICHIGAN 9,834 7,822 97,567, $1,709,199 $174 $6,651 Illinois 12,831 10, ,788, $3,017,527 $235 $10,299 Indiana 6,484 5,698 75,761, $1,215,322 $187 $6,077 Minnesota 5,304 4,848 56,632, $1,672,190 $315 $5,888 Ohio 11,537 9, ,836, $2,706,474 $235 $10,330 Wisconsin 5,687 4,968 59,420, $1,315,897 $231 $5,552

10 State State Gas Tax (cents) Federal Gas Tax (cents) Return on Federal Gas Tax Michigan % Illinois % Indiana % Minnesota % Ohio % Wisconsin %

11

12

13 We have 20+ mini-mdot s plus numerous local agencies all doing their own thing. We want consistent interpretation of the plans and specs. We want the flexibility to work with individual offices on issues. as directed by the Engineer promotes inconsistency. We ve never had to do it that way before. We ve always done it that way. It doesn t have to meet spec. It s covered by the warranty. Specifications are just a guideline. Guideline???? Let me get my dictionary!

14 Uniform (yoo ne-form) adj. 1.a. Always the same; unchanging; unvarying. b. Without fluctuation or variation; consistent; regular. Consistent (ken-sis tent) adj. 1.a. Agreeing; compatible; not contradictory. 2. Conforming to the same principles or action.

15 Uniform interpretation of plans and specs Uniformity in sampling, testing and acceptance methods Uniformity in the decision making process

16 When waiving contract requirements: Consult Justify Document Adjust When in doubt, Stick with what s in writing

17 STC Resolution passed March 22, 2012 Pre-March 22, 2012 CM s required STC approval prior to payment After March 22, 2012 No approval of CM s required by the STC Reporting at the Project/Contract Level ALL Contracts exceeding 110% of As Awarded $ Primary reasons for the overrun

18 Monthly Completed Projects Exceeding 110% of Original Contract amount What happened? How Much? Who Will Pay?

19 MDOT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FINALED IN SEPTEMBER 2013 Total Original Contract Amount Total Final Contract Amount Total Increase or Decrease Total Percent # of Jobs Over 10% # of Jobs Under 65,532, ,054, ,521, % 7 17 Region Date Prefix Control Section Job Number Original Contract Amount Final Contract Amount Increase or Decrease 10% Date Work Started Expect Compl. Bay 9/2/2010 ARE A 297, , (19,301.73) -6.49% 7/13/2009 5/21/2010 5/12/ M Bay 9/2/2010 STE A 447, , (2,768.47) -0.62% 7/13/2009 5/21/2010 5/12/ M Bay 9/2/2010 EBSL A Bay 9/2/2010 STT A Bay 9/2/2010 STE A Percent Over or Under 1,843, ,681, (161,749.62) -8.77% 943, , (53,107.12) -5.63% 530, , (14,321.46) -2.70% Jobs Over Actual Compl. Δ Days ** Designed by MDOT or Cons. 7/13/2009 5/21/2010 5/12/ M 7/13/2009 5/21/2010 5/12/ M 7/13/2009 5/21/2010 5/12/ M Bay 9/2/2010 STT A 845, , (37,890.60) -4.48% 6/1/2010 6/30/2010 6/21/ M Bay 9/15/2010 STH A 357, , , % * 6/1/2009 6/30/2009 9/16/ M Grand 9/22/2010 IM A 3,698, ,532, , % * 8/16/ /30/ /18/ M Grand 9/30/2010 AR A 1,567, ,527, (40,281.11) -2.57% 8/3/ /2/ /12/ C Grand 9/15/2010 NH A Grand 9/2/2010 CM A Grand 9/30/2010 AR1 (NH A Grand 9/30/2010 IMG A Metro 9/20/2010 EDA A Metro 9/9/2010 NH A 4,660, ,516, (143,927.76) -3.09% 418, , , % 336, , (1,501.93) -0.45% 580, , , % 1,432, ,996, , % * 3,519, ,263, (255,782.45) -7.27% 9/16/2008 5/17/2010 5/14/ M 7/6/2009 5/17/ /20/ M 8/13/2009 9/4/ /30/ M 8/19/ /14/2009 4/15/ M 9/4/ /22/2008 5/19/ M 5/18/ /24/ /22/ M Metro 9/22/2010 STG A 35, , , % * 11/2/ /18/ /22/ C Metro 9/15/2010 NHG A 408, , , % 7/10/2009 8/30/2009 9/22/ M Metro 9/22/2010 STG A 35, , (5,593.22) % 10/13/ /21/ /9/ C Metro 9/16/2010 NH A 451, , (67,962.39) % 4/19/2010 5/28/2010 5/20/ M Metro 9/27/2010 NH A 69, , (4,619.13) -6.67% 8/16/2008 8/29/2008 8/20/ M Metro 9/27/2010 EDA A 1,122, ,234, , % 8/14/2007 9/19/2009 9/19/ M Metro 9/27/2010 STH A 303, , (21,150.52) -6.97% 6/18/2008 8/22/2008 8/22/ C North 9/1/2010 AR A 671, , (116,669.39) % 7/16/2009 8/28/2009 8/29/ M North 9/27/2010 AR A 373, , (12,780.91) -3.42% 4/12/2010 6/25/2010 6/14/ M North 9/23/2010 STE A 446, , , % 9/14/2009 6/1/2010 5/27/ M North 9/23/2010 AR A 1,052, ,053, % 9/29/2009 6/1/2010 4/22/ M Southwest 9/28/2010 CM A 816, , , % 6/2/ /30/ /6/ C

20 Project: A "Reason #1: CM #1 includes an increases of $49, for the increased quantity of handling and disposing of non-hazardous contaminated materials. This was necessary to meet the requirements of handling and disposing this type of contaminated material as the material was encountered during excavation operations to install the new roadway lighting conduits. Reason #2: CM #2 includes increases totaling $43, for extra work to reroute the proposed conduits and redesign electrical vaults to avoid existing utilities and to add traffic control devices to allow the completion of transverse conduit connections to the existing light foundations on the south side of Fort Street. All the extra work was necessary to complete the project on time and provide the necessary roadway lighting to Fort Street. Reasons 1-2 account for $93,311.60, or 88%of the total project cost increases. "

21 OCA has the responsibility to ensure that MDOT is meeting the requirements of the State Transportation Commission Resolution

22

23 MDOT LOCAL

24 TOP 10 PRIME CONTRACTORS AWARDED CONTRACTS FY 2013 FY 2012 Prime Contractor Award Amount Prime Contractor Award Amount Walter Toebe Construction Company $139,143, Dan's Excavating, Inc. $115,489, Dan's Excavating, Inc. $96,892, Ajax Paving Industries, Inc. $62,186, Ajax Paving Industries, Inc. $94,625, Michigan Paving and Materials Company $50,703, Rieth-Riley Construction Co., Inc. $81,449, Rieth-Riley Construction Co., Inc. $49,431, C.A. Hull Co., Inc. $65,453, C.A. Hull Co., Inc. $48,350, Michigan Paving and Materials Co. $57,085, Walter Toebe Construction Company $33,976, Kamminga & Roodvoets, Inc. $45,525, Cadillac Asphalt, L.L.C. $24,954, Cadillac Asphalt, L.L.C. $39,579, D.J. McQuestion & Sons, Inc. $24,765, PCL Civil Constructors, Inc. $31,690, Angelo Iafrate Construction Company $24,007, Anlaan Corporation $31,334, Kamminga & Roodvoets, Inc. $21,063, TOTAL - TOP TEN CONTRACTS $682,779, TOTAL - TOP TEN CONTRACTS $454,930, TOTAL AWARDED $1,201,383, TOTAL AWARDED $923,919, Percent of Total Program 56.83% Percent of Total Program 49.24%

25 Current Summary of MDOT Projects Time Period Original Contract Cost Final Contract Cost Percent Difference Current Month, December 2013 $112,016, $115,825, % 2014 Fiscal Year $314,888, $323,975, % Five Year Summary of MDOT Projects Calendar Year Original Contract Cost Final Contract Cost Percent Difference 2009 $726,981, $750,956, % 2010 $615,818, $615,142, % 2011 $833,072, $842,999, % 2012 $771,130, $768,530, % 2013 $1,127,211, $1,139,133, % 2014 $0.00 $ %

26