licensed Asbestos Building Inspector 1119 Fifth Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA15010 Phone

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "licensed Asbestos Building Inspector 1119 Fifth Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA15010 Phone"

Transcription

1 Mark D. Stowe licensed Asbestos Building Inspector 1119 Fifth Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA15010 Phone November 12, 2013 Ms. Shannon Schlosser, Secretary Franklin Township, Beaver County 897 State Route 288 Fombell, PA Dear Ms. Schlosser, Enclosed please find the report titled, Building Inspection 114 McKim Way, Fombell, PA For Asbestos Materials Of Please contact me if you have any questions about the inspection or this report. Sincerely, JnJ~ Mark D. Stowe Inspector

2 Building Inspection for Asbestos Materials Of 114McKim Wav Fombell, PA16123 For Franklin Township Franklin Township, Beaver eountv 891 State Route 288 Fombell, PA16123 BV Mark D.Stowe 1119Fifth Avenue Beaver Falls, (124J

3 Table 01Contents Introduction Inspection Procedures Building Background Discussion Report of Bulk Sample Analysis Laboratory Analysis Sheets Inspector Certifications

4 Introduction A Survey was conducted for asbestos-containing building materials at 114 McKim Way, Fombell, PA The inspection was conducted in accordance with a verbal agreement with Franklin Township. The inspection was conducted on November 6, The inspection was conducted by Mark D. Stowe, a Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry Certified Asbestos Building Inspector, The inspection was conducted to identify asbestos-containing materials that may exist in the structure to comply with both the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) regulations prior to the demolition of the building. Inspection Procedures All visually and physically accessible areas of the facility were inspected and samples of suspect materials were collected for analysis. All samples were transported under chain-of-custody documentation for laboratory analysis. The asbestos samples were collected placed into individual containers, sealed, and assigned a unique identification number. Information including the material type and location from which the sample was collected was recorded on a Bulk Sample Record. Bulk samples of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (SACM) were then submitted for PLM Analysis. The methodology employed consisted of categorizing and identifying all suspect asbestos containing building components or materials. Pipe insulation, floor tile, mastic, plaster, wall board, window caulking/glazing, and other suspect materials were all categorized and then assessed for asbestos content. Both friable and non-friable suspect asbestos containing materials were considered during the course of the inspection. Friable materials are those materials that can be pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Homogeneous materials were identified and bulk samples of each material were collected based on material homogeneity. A homogeneous material is one which seems by function, texture, color, and wear to be uniform in nature and to have been applied during the same general time period. Building Background The building is a two story wood frame residential dwelling built on wood joists built over a dirt floor crawl space. No suspected asbestos containing materials were identified in the crawl space. The building was built in The dwelling has a wood framed pitched roof. The total area encompassed is approximately 2,078 sq. ft. Interior walls are dry wall and plaster. Flooring surfaces include floor tile, concrete, wood and carpeting. Ceilings are drywall, plaster or ceiling tile. Roofing materials asphalt roof shingles. The building has had limited and infrequent use for an extended period of time. Many of the interior materials have been extensively damaged through water incursion and physical forces.

5 Limitations All physically and visually accessible areas of the building were inspected. Undetected ACM may exist in areas (e.g., inside walls, above inaccessible ceilings) which were not visually or physically accessible at the time of the inspection. Discussion A total of twenty-one (21) representative bulk samples of fourteen (14) different homogeneous suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected. The samples were analyzed by RJ Lee Group, Inc. which is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). This analysis was performed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), the EPA recommended method for bulk asbestos analysis. An asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined by the EPA as "any material containing more than one percent (1%), by weight, of asbestos of any type or mixture of types".

6 Report of Bulk Sample Analysis Sample # Location Homogeneous Description Material FT Floor Entrance of Front Door Floor Tile (1) Brown Floor Tile FT 114-2A 1 51 Floor Living Room Wall Plaster (1) White Finish Coat Plaster FT 114-2B 1 51 Floor Living Room Wall Plaster (2) Gray Base Coat Plaster FT 114-3A 1 51 Floor Living Room Ceiling Plaster (3) Tan Finish Coat Plaster FT 114-3B 1 5 Floor Living Room Ceiling Plaster (1) White Finish Coat Plaster FT 114-3C 1 51 Floor Living Room Ceiling Plaster (2) Gray Base Coat Plaster FT st Floor Kitchen 2 nd Ceiling (Drop) Ceiling Tile (1) White Fibrous Ceiling Tile FT st Floor Kitchen 1 st Ceiling (Interior) Ceiling Tile (2) White Fibrous Ceiling Tile FT Floor Above Kitchen Ceiling Insulation Gray Fibrous Insulation FT 114-7A 1 51 Floor Kitchen Wall Plaster (1) White Finish Coat Plaster FT 114-7B 1 51 Floor Kitchen Wall Plaster (2) Gray Base Coat Plaster FT Floor Kitchen Wall Rock Lath Style Wallboard White Wallboard with Tan Paper FT nd Floor Left Bedroom Wall Wallboard White Wallboard with Tan Paper FT nd Floor Right Bedroom Wall Cellulose Board Brown Cellulose Board FT nd Floor Right Bedroom Ceiling Cellulose Ceiling Tile Brown Cellulose Ceiling Tile FT nd Floor Hall Floor Floor Tile Brown Floor Tile FT Floor Utility Room Ceiling Ceiling Tile (3) White Fibrous Ceiling Tile FT Main Roof Front 2nd Layer (Exposed) Roof Shingle Black Roof Shingle(Black & WhiteGranules) FT Main Roof Front 1st Layer (original) Roof Shingle Black Roof Shingle (Black Granules) FT nd Floor Front Window Window Glazing White Window Glazing FT st Floor Rear Utility Room (LeftFrontCorner) Transite Flue Pipe 6" Transite Flue Pipe Analytical Results The following materials tested positive for the presence of asbestos. Sample FT " Transite Flue Pipe (7' Length) 20% Chrysotile Exterior Left Side Shows Flu Through Roof

7 RJ Lee Group, Inc. RJ Lee Group, Inc. 350 Hochberg Road, Monroeville, PA Tel: I Fax: Laboratory Report Beaver Falls Fire Dept th Street Beaver Falls, PA United States Attention: Mark Stowe Telephone: Report Date Sample Receipt Date RJ Lee Group Job No. Authorization/P.O. No. Client Job No.lName 11/11/ /07/2013 AOH Franklin Twp 114 Mckim Way Analysis: Method: Asbestos in Bulk Samples EPAl600/R-93/116 RJLG Sample Client Sample # of Layers Asbestos Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Analyst - Analysis Homogeneous Detected(%) Fibers(%) Materials(%) Material Date HPL FT Yes 1 NO 100 CA, B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 Brown Floor Tile HPL FT No 2 NO 1.6 CE 98.4 Q, T,CA, WHP-11/11/2013 OP,G Calculated Composite - White Finish Coat Plaster; Gray Sandy Base Coat Plaster Layer Information: 20%-White Finish Coat Plaster Yes NO 100 Q, CA, OP, G 80%-Gray Base Coat Plaster Yes NO 2CE 98 Q, T,CA, OP,G Page 1 of5

8 RJ LeeGrollp, Inc. Laboratory Report (Cont) Client Job No.lName: Franklin Twp 114 Mckim Way RJ Lee Group Job No: AOH RJLG Sample Client Sample Homogeneous # of Layers Asbestos Detected(%) Non-Asbestos Fibers(%) Non-Fibrous Materials(%) Matrix Material Analyst - Analysis Date HPL FT No 3 ND 100 Q, CA, OP, G WHP-11/11/2013 Calculated Composite - Tan Finish Coat Plaster; White Finish Coat Plaster; Gray Sandy Base Coat Plaster Layer Information: 10%-Tan Finish Coat Plaster Yes ND 100 CA, OP, G 10%-White Finish Coat Plaster Yes ND 100 Q, CA. OP, G 80%-Gray Base Coat Plaster Yes ND 100 Q, CA, OP. G HPL FT Yes 1 ND 40CE40 MW 20 Q, P. B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 White Fibrous Ceiling Tile HPL FT Yes 1 ND 40CE40MW 20 Q, P, B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 White Fibrous Ceiling Tile HPL FT Yes 1 ND 95 CE 5 OP WHP-11/11/2013 Gray Fibrous Insulation HPL FT No 2 ND 1.8 CE 98.2 Q, CA, OP, G WHP-11/11/2013 Calculated Composite - White Finish Coat Plaster; Gray Sandy Base Coat Plaster Layer Information: 10%-White Finish Coat Plaster Yes ND 100 Q, CA, OP, G 90%-Gray Base Coat Plaster Yes ND 2 CE 98 Q,CA,OP,G HPL FT Yes 1 ND 5CE 95 Q, CA, OP, G WHP-11/11/2013 White Wallboard with Tan Paper Page 2 of5

9 RJ LeeGrollp, Inc. Laboratory Report (Cont) Client Job No./Name: Franklin Twp 114 Mckim Way RJ Lee Group Job No: AOH RJLG Sample Client Sample # of Layers Asbestos Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Analyst - Analysis Homogeneous Detected(%) Fibers(%) Materials(%) Material Date HPL FT Yes 1 NO 5CE 95 Q, CA, OP, G WHP-11/11/2013 VVhiteWallboard with Tan Paper HPL FT Yes 1 NO 95 CE 5 B,OP WHP-11/11/2013 Brown Cellulose Board HPL FT Yes 1 NO 95 CE 5 B,OP WHP-11/11/2013 Brown Cellulose Ceiling Tile HPL FT Yes 1 NO 100 CA, B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 Brown Floor Tile HPL FT Yes 1 NO 40CE40MW 20 Q, P, B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 VVhite Fibrous Ceiling Tile HPL FT Yes 1 NO 15 FG 85 Q, T,CA, WHP-11/11/2013 OP, M Black Roof Shingle with Black and VVhiteGranules HPL FT Yes 1 NO 40 CE 60 Q, T,CA, WHP-11/11/2013 OP,M Black Roof Shingle with Black Granules HPL FT Yes 1 NO 100 Q, CA, B, OP WHP-11/11/2013 VVhite Window Glazing Page 3 of 5

10 RJ LeeGrollp, Inc. Laboratory Report (Cont) Client Job No.lName: Franklin Twp 114 Mckim Way RJ Lee Group Job No: AOH RJLG Sample Client Sample Homogeneous # of Layers Asbestos Detected(%) Non-Asbestos Fibers(%) Non-Fibrous Materials(%) Matrix Material Analyst - Analysis Date HPL FT Yes 20CH 80 a,ca, B, OP,M WHP-11/11/2013 Gray Transite Page 4 of5

11 RJ LeeGrollp, Inc. Laboratory Report (Cont) Client Job No./Name: Franklin Twp 114 Mckim Way RJ Lee Group Job No: AOH RJLG Sample Client Sample # of Layers Asbestos Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Homooeneous Oetected(%) Fibers(%) Materials(%) ~Jf.-: Matrix Material /(.V'~ Analyst - Analysis Date Authorized Signature: _ William H. Powers, Manager-Optical ASBESTOS NON-ASBESTOS NON-FIBROUS MATERIALS AM = Amosite CE = Cellulose AM = Amphibole HY = Hydromagnesite Q = Quartz AC = Actinolite MW = Mineral Wool B = Binder M = Miscellaneous T = Tar AN = Anthophyllite FG = Fibrous Glass CA = Carbonates MI = Mica V = Vermiculite CH = Chrysotile SF = Synthetic Fibers CL = Clay OP = Opaque CR = Crocidolite H = Hair F = Feldspar OR = Organic TR = Tremolite W = Wollastonite G = Gypsum P = Perlite OF = Other Fibers DISCLAIMER NOTES "NO" indicates no asbestos was detected; the method detection limit is 1%. "Trace" or "<1" indicates asbestos was identified in the sample, but the concentration is less than the method quantitation limit of 1%. PLM coefficients of variance range from approximately 1.8 at the quantitation limit of 1% to 0.1 at high fiber concentrations. Samples are archived for three months following analysis and are then properly discarded. These results are submitted pursuant to RJ Lee Group's current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which these results are used or interpreted. This test report relates to the items tested. This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP-approved signatory. Any reproduction of this document must be in full in order for the report to be valid. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP. any agency of the U.S. Government or any other laboratory accrediting agency. Polarized-light microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar nonfriable organically bound materials. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if this material can be considered or treated as "non-asbestos-containing." Sample(s) for this project were analyzed at our: Monroeville, PA (AIHA #100364) facility. If RJ Lee Group, Inc. did not collect the samples analyzed, the verifiability of the laboratorys results are limited to the reported values. Page 5 of5