If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

Transcription

1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST Chicago, IL, DATE LAST THREE YEAR REINSPECTION WAS COMPLETED 2/25/2010 If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. SECTION II (Please type or print) PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING FOR YOUR THREE YEAR REINSPECTION: DATE REINSPECTION COMPLETED: 4/16/2013 IDPH INSPECTOR LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED INSPECTOR NAME (Please Print): Keith Clough IDPH MP LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED MANAGEMENT PLANNER NAME (Please Print): DESIGNATED PERSON (Please Print): Ms. Lynn Crivello ENROLLMENT 329 Stephen Diblik PHONE: (773) /16/2013 Signature of Designated Person Date SECTION III PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR ANY CHANGES WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. School building has been sold. Date of Sale: School has been closed. Date closed: School building has been demolished. School building is asbestos free since last reinspection: Please explain in writing why the school building is now asbestos free and include the supporting documentation. If a new school building has been added to the district, submit either and exclusionary statement or a management plan and inspection report. Include the complete name, address and city of school building. Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: IL Revised 10.03

2 THREE YEAR REINSPECTION CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST 299 Chicago, IL, Unit: Building ID: IDPH ID Number: REPORT DATE: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Prepared for: 125 S. Clark Street Chicago, IL Prepared by: 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone (312) Fax (312) DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCHOOL REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW

3 March 29, 2013 Mr. R. Kent Cook Asbestos Program Illinois Department of Public Health 525 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois Re: Three-Year Reinspections Dear Mr. Cook:, Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC), conducted the ThreeYear Reinspections and performed management plan updates for the (CPS) facilities in Region 3,4,5 Elementary Schools. Please update your records with the following information. School District: 299 Unit: School: Region: 05 IDPH ID: Building ID: Address: Chicago, IL, Building Contact: Gavin, James Contact Phone: Current Building Owners: Review 4/16/2013 Inspector: Keith Clough Management Planner: Stephen Diblik Inspector IDPH License: Management Planner IDPH License: If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (312) Sincerely, Stephen Diblik

4 Environmental Notification to Occupants To: Faculty, Staff and Parents From: March 29, 2013 RE:, Unit Chicago, IL, Dear Faculty, Staff and Parents, This letter is to notify you that the 2013 asbestos three year re-inspection has been completed at, following the Federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E and is available for your review at the main office of the school. Although asbestos-containing materials have been identified at, there is no reason to believe that any threat to the health of students or staff exists at this time. CPS will continue to carefully monitor the condition of asbestos-containing materials and if conditions warrant, all appropriate steps will be taken to maintain the health and safety of all building occupants. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please feel free to contact Ms. Lynn Crivello, the designated Local Education Authority's Designated Person at (773)

5 Table of Contents I. School and Inspection Information II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Abatement History V. Reassessments and Recommendations VI. Conclusions Table I: Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table II: Management Planner's Review APPENDICES: Appendix A: Assessment Sheets, Drawings and Photos Appendix B: Inspector and Management Planner Licenses Appendix C: Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: Laboratory Results Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

6 SCHOOL AND INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. School Information School: Address: IDPH ID: Contact: Gavin, James Unit: Chicago, IL, Building ID: Phone: Description of Facility Original Construction: Total Square Footage: Current Occupancy: Additional Construction: No of Floors: LEA Designated Person Contact: Ms. Lynn Crivello Address: 125 South Clark Street, 17th Floor Chicago, IL Phone: (773) Managing Environmental Consultant MEC: Contact: Dan Juneau Address 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector Inspector Name: Keith Clough Signature: 3/29/2013 Inspector IDPH license # 6. Region: 05 Management Planner Management Planner Name: Stephen Diblik Signature: 4/16/2013 Management Planner IDPH license # Review 4/16/ LEA Designated Person's Acknowledgement The reinspection report and recommendations have been received by me and appropriate action will be taken by the School District. Signature: 4/16/2013 Name: Ms. Lynn Crivello Unit : Building:

7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY was retained by the (CPS) to perform a three-year asbestos reinspection of the. This inspection was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) part (b), and the ongoing Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M) originally designed in the School's Asbestos Management Plan. The purpose of this three-year reinspection is to record any condition changes in the asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in the school since the previous three-year reinspection and the six-month periodic surveillance, to identify, assess, and include any Homogeneous Areas (HA) not identified in the Management Plan, and to recommend an appropriate response action to manage asbestos. The inspector conducted a three-year reinspection of this facility under Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) school reinspection requirements and AHERA, sections and The main building and each addition to the main building, if constructed at different dates, were inspected separately. Laboratory accreditations are included in Appendix C, laboratory results are included in Appendix D, and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix E. Note: During previous inspections, some of the HA(s) were identified together as 9" x 9" floor tile (FT), mastics assoc. with 9" x 9" FT, 12" x 12" FT, mastics assoc. with 12" x 12" FT, pipe insulation, etc. Some of these HA(s) have been re-identified by areas that are uniform in color, texture, construction date, application date, and general appearance. The inspector has determined the following: A. The following HAs have changed assessment categories for Building : Unit: 02 12x12 light grey floor tile 04 hardcoat plaster 09 12x12 beige floor tile 12 2x4 ceiling tile 16 12x12 grey floor tile 20 12x12 pink floor tile 24 12x12 tan floor tile 26 12x12 grey floor tile J fittings on fiberglass Building:

8 Unit: P pre-form pipe insulation Q duct insulation jacket T Aircell pipe insulation Building:

9 B. The following new homogenous areas have been identified for Building : Unit: Building:

10 C. This reinspection covered only physically accessible and visible areas and materials that were identified in the LEA's management plan. The following materials were concealed and/or contained in areas that were inaccessible for sampling and have been classified as Assumed: E F J O Q T 12x12 light grey floor tile hardcoat plaster 12x12 beige floor tile 2x4 ceiling tile firedoors firedoors 12x12 grey floor tile 12x12 purple floor tile 12x12 purple floor tile mastic 12x12 pink floor tile 12x12 tan floor tile 12x12 grey floor tile univents boiler insulation under metal jacklet fittings on fiberglass duct expansion joint duct insulation jacket Aircell pipe insulation The following areas were deemed to be inaccessible: F H P Q R S 12x12 purple floor tile mastic 9x9 brown floor tile mastic boiler insulation under metal jacklet aircell pipe insulation pre-form pipe insulation duct insulation jacket aircell joint insulation preform pipe joint insulation Materials were also listed as "assumed" if they were in good condition and sampling was not conducted to avoid damage. This reinspection was conducted by Keith Clough, IDPH License #. The Management Plan was updated by Stephen Diblik, IDPH License # Inspector and Management Planner Licenses are included in Appendix B. Unit: Building:

11 III. METHODOLOGY Tasks performed on-site included the following: IV. 1. Review current management plan, identify HA(s) and extract appropriate information. 2. Examine and verify abatement records. 3. Touch and visually and physically reinspect and reassess the condition of all friable known or assumed ACBM. 4. Touch and visually and physically reinspect all non-friable known or assumed ACBM to determine whether these materials have become friable since the last inspection or periodic surveillance. 5. Identify any condition changes that may affect Hazard Ranking of known ACBM or Assumed ACBM, as well as any HA(s) that have become friable since the last reinspection. 6. Collect bulk samples from each newly discovered friable HA or previously assumed and submit for laboratory analysis. 7. Tabulate reinspection findings and submit for management planner review and recommendations with appropriate response actions based on the AHERA Damage Category of the ACBM. 8. Submit reinspection findings and management planner recommendations to the LEA within thirty (30) days for inclusion into the management plan. ABATEMENT HISTORY The information collected from the existing management plan and inspection report(s) and from interviews with the school official revealed that the following asbestos abatement was conducted at the school since the previous Three year Reinspection. Abatement Dates: V. REASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The reassessments and recommendations are summarized in Tables I and II on the following pages. Detailed Hazard Assessment Sheets and Drawings and Photos (if applicable) are included in Appendix A. VI. CONCLUSIONS The Building Three-Year reinspection has been completed and response actions have been recommended for both friable and non-friable materials. A timely execution of the response actions recommended will enable the LEA and the Designated Person(s) to effectively manage the existing ACBM. This three-year reinspection report should be inspected in the current Management plan at the CPS Central Office, and one (1) copy should be kept at the school for use when planning any renovation and/or demolition activities in areas where ACBM has been identified. Also, periodic surveillance documentation and any summary reports from any response actions that are executed at the school should be used to update the Management Plan. Unit: Building:

12 Table I Inspector's Reinspection Findings

13 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA No Material Description 01 9x9 floor tile (1961) 02 12x12 light grey floor tile 03 carpeting (1961) 04 hardcoat plaster old spray-on insulation new spray-on ceiling insulation hardcoat plaster 9x9 brown floor tile 09 12x12 beige floor tile hardcoat plaster canvas wall covering (1902) 12 2x4 ceiling tile 7, firedoors 8 EA 14 firedoors 6 15 light grey floor tile mastic 16 12x12 grey floor tile x12 grey floor tile mastic 12x12 purple floor tile x12 pink floor tile mastic 12x12 beige floor tile mastic 24 12x12 tan floor tile 25 12x12 tan floor tile mastic Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Change in Assessment Category Damage Category material removed UNDEFINE D ASSUMED 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage MODERATE UNDEFINE D ASSUMED NONE 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage MODERATE 1961 building 1961 building 1938 building gym classroom 205 (1902), formerly teachers room throughout classrooms (1902), room 201 N None NONE 0 No ACBM with the potential for damage LOW N NONE 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage LOW material removed (1902) building UNDEFINE D ASSUMED building 1938 ASSUMED N NONE 0 Yes N NONE 0 No ASSUMED N NONE 0 No ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage LOW EA building classrooms, storage rooms corridors NO_ACBM corridors corridors ASSUMED N NONE 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage LOW NO_ACBM ASSUMED N None NONE 0 No LOW 1961 corridors ASSUMED N NONE 0 No classrooms ASSUMED N NONE 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 12x12 purple floor tile mastic x12 pink floor tile classrooms throughout classroms auditoruim NO_ACBM NO_ACBM ASSUMED 0 Yes ACBM with the potential for damage LOW auditorium NO_ACBM 15,000 classroom/storage rooms (1961) material removed 40, building ,000 1,700 3,500 Friable Damage Type N NONE N ABATED NO_ACBM NO_ACBM CHR ASSUMED Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Reason Disturbance Potential LOW LOW LOW LOW None None N NONE None

14 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA No Material Description 26 12x12 grey floor tile 27 12x12 grey floor tile mastic 28 9x9 brown floor tile x9 brown floor tile mastic brown carpet mastic 31 purple carpet mastic 32 drywall drywall compound drywall stucco ceiling plaster stucco ceiling plaster 38 transite table tops A fiberglass duct wrap B duct expansion joint C fiberglass insulation E univents F boiler insulation under metal jacklet G tank insulation - material removed H aircell pipe insulation I fiberglass insulation J fittings on fiberglass K cardboard insulation - REMOVED boiler room L cardboard joint insulation- REMOVED 1902 building Material Quantity 2,200 Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type main corridor ASSUMED N NONE main corridors 1938 gym storage room 1938 gym storage room 1938 main office area st floor classrooms pumproom (1902) and corridors pump room main corridor main corridor corridors and classrooms classroom mechanical room, building 1961 mechanical room 1961 NO_ACBM CHR N DIST CHR N DIST NO_ACBM None NO_ACBM None NO_ACBM None NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM None None NO_ACBM None Damage Quantity Change in Assessment Category Yes Damage Category 10 No 10 No ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 0 Damage Units TSI None NO_ACBM TSI None NOT_TEST ED ASSUMED TSI TSI N NONE 0 No 600 boiler room ASSUMED TSI N NONE 0 No pump room UNDEFINE D CHR TSI Y NONE 0 NOT_TEST ED ASSUMED TSI N NONE 0 UNDEFINE D UNDEFINE D TSI 100 JOINTS pump room building TSI TSI TSI 5 LOW 5 HIGH Low 1961 building fan room LOW None EA LF ACBM with the potential for damage Disturbance Potential None Damage Reason ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage LOW No Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM LOW Yes ACBM with the potential for damage LOW LOW

15 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA No Material Description M N O P duct expansion joint pre-form pipe insulation 75 LF Q duct insulation jacket 75 LF R aircell joint insulation 7 LF S preform pipe joint insulation 10 LF T Aircell pipe insulation 40 LF Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category aircell duct insulation - REMOVED fan room tank room UNDEFINE D UNDEFINE D ASSUMED CHR TSI hot water tank insulation-removed TSI TSI N Y NONE crawlspace below auditorium stage boiler/pump room 1902 coal room ASSUMED TSI N CHR TSI Y CHR TSI 1902 bldg - Pump room ASSUMED TSI fan room coal room Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category 0 Yes NONE 0 Yes NONE 0 No N NONE 0 No Y NONE 0 Yes Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential TSI LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW

16 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report Reinspection Date 3/29/2013 Inspector Name Inspector's Comments Keith Clough 5/15/2013 Inspector's IDPH License Number / Expiration Date HA Number: Inspector Comments: Material Not Observed Removed Material Not Observed Removed See HA #4 Material Not Observed Removed

17 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: A B C E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R Inspector Comments: Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Material Not Observed Removed Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Material Not Observed Removed Material Not Observed Removed Material Not Observed Removed Material Not Observed Removed Material Not Observed 2013

18 School Unit Building ID Address Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: S T Inspector Comments:

19 Table II Management Planner's Review

20 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description x9 floor tile (1961) 12x12 light grey floor tile carpeting (1961) hardcoat plaster old spray-on insulation new spray-on ceiling insulation hardcoat plaster 9x9 brown floor tile 09 12x12 beige floor tile hardcoat plaster canvas wall covering (1902) 2x4 ceiling tile firedoors firedoors light grey floor tile mastic 12x12 grey floor tile 12x12 grey floor tile mastic 12x12 purple floor tile 12x12 purple floor tile mastic 12x12 pink floor tile 12x12 pink floor tile mastic 12x12 beige floor tile mastic 12x12 tan floor tile 12x12 tan floor tile mastic 12x12 grey floor tile 12x12 grey floor tile mastic 9x9 brown floor tile 9x9 brown floor tile mastic brown carpet mastic purple carpet mastic drywall drywall compound drywall Material Quantity Material Units 15,000 40, ,000 7, EA EA 1, ,500 2, Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category material removed classroom/storage rooms (1961) material removed 1961 building 1961 building 1961 building 1938 building gym classroom 205 (1902), formerly teachers room throughout classrooms (1902), room 201 Undefined Assumed Undefined Assumed Abated No ACBM No ACBM Chrysotile Assumed material removed (1902) building building 1938 building classrooms, storage rooms corridors corridors corridors 1961 corridors classrooms classrooms throughout classroms auditoruim auditorium main corridor main corridors gym storage room gym storage room main office area st floor classrooms pumproom (1902) and corridors pump room main corridor Undefined Assumed Assumed Assumed No ACBM Assumed No ACBM Assumed Assumed Assumed No ACBM No ACBM Assumed No ACBM Assumed No ACBM Chrysotile Chrysotile No ACBM No ACBM No ACBM No ACBM No ACBM Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No No No EA EA 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No No No ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No 0 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No No ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance

21 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description A B C E F G H stucco ceiling plaster stucco ceiling plaster transite table tops fiberglass duct wrap duct expansion joint fiberglass insulation univents boiler insulation under metal jacklet tank insulation - material removed aircell pipe insulation I J K L M N O P fiberglass insulation fittings on fiberglass cardboard insulation - REMOVED cardboard joint insulation- REMOVED aircell duct insulation - REMOVED hot water tank insulation-removed duct expansion joint pre-form pipe insulation Q R S T duct insulation jacket aircell joint insulation preform pipe joint insulation Aircell pipe insulation Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category main corridor corridors and classrooms classroom mechanical room, building 1961 mechanical room No ACBM No ACBM No ACBM 1961 building boiler room pump room fan room No ACBM Not Tested Assumed Assumed Undefined Chrysotile TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI Not Tested Assumed Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Assumed Chrysotile TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed TSI TSI TSI TSI EA 100 LF 100 JOINTS 75 LF pump room building boiler room building fan room tank room fan room coal room LF LF LF LF crawlspace below auditorium stage boiler/pump room coal room bldg - Pump room Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response No No 0 0 EA 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Yes 0 LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Operations and Maintenance No 0 JOINTS 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance No Yes 0 LF Operations and Maintenance No Yes No Yes LF LF LF LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance

22 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report 4/16/2013 Review Date Manager Planner Name Stephen Diblik /15/2013 Manager IDPH License No/Expiration HA Number Management Comments

23 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number A B C E F G H Management Comments

24 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 05 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 600 West Van Buren St., Ste 500 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number I J K L M N O P Q R S T Management Comments

25 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 01 9x9 floor tile (1961) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: material removed COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

26 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x9 floor tile (1961) material removed In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

27 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 02 12x12 light grey floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: MODERATE classroom/storage rooms (1961) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

28 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 light grey floor tile classroom/storage rooms (1961) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

29 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 03 carpeting (1961) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: material removed COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

30 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ carpeting (1961) material removed In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

31 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 04 hardcoat plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: MODERATE 1961 building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

32 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ hardcoat plaster 1961 building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

33 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 05 old spray-on insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1961 building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

34 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ old spray-on insulation 1961 building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

35 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 06 new spray-on ceiling insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1961 building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

36 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ new spray-on ceiling insulation 1961 building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

37 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 07 hardcoat plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1938 building gym COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

38 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ hardcoat plaster 1938 building gym In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

39 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 08 9x9 brown floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: FRIABLE: Chrysotile No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW classroom 205 (1902), formerly teachers room 390 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

40 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x9 brown floor tile classroom 205 (1902), formerly teachers room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

41 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 09 12x12 beige floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW throughout classrooms (1902), room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

42 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 beige floor tile throughout classrooms (1902), room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

43 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 10 hardcoat plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: COMMENTS: See HA #4 Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

44 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ hardcoat plaster In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

45 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11 canvas wall covering (1902) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: material removed COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

46 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ canvas wall covering (1902) material removed In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

47 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 12 2x4 ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW (1902) building 7000 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

48 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x4 ceiling tile (1902) building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

49 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 13 firedoors HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW building EA EA COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

50 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ firedoors building EA 0 EA In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

51 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 14 firedoors HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW building EA EA COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

52 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ firedoors building EA 0 EA In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

53 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15 light grey floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: classrooms, storage rooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

54 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ light grey floor tile mastic classrooms, storage rooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

55 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 16 12x12 grey floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW corridors 1700 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

56 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 grey floor tile corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

57 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 17 12x12 grey floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: corridors COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

58 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 grey floor tile mastic corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

59 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 18 12x12 purple floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW corridors 360 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

60 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 purple floor tile corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

61 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 19 12x12 purple floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW 1961 corridors 360 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

62 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 purple floor tile mastic 1961 corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

63 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 20 12x12 pink floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW classrooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

64 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 pink floor tile classrooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

65 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 21 12x12 pink floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: classrooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

66 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 pink floor tile mastic classrooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

67 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 23 12x12 beige floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: throughout classroms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

68 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 beige floor tile mastic throughout classroms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

69 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 24 12x12 tan floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW auditoruim COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

70 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 tan floor tile auditoruim In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

71 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 25 12x12 tan floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: auditorium COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

72 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 tan floor tile mastic auditorium In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

73 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 26 12x12 grey floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW main corridor COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

74 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 grey floor tile main corridor In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

75 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 27 12x12 grey floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: main corridors COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

76 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x12 grey floor tile mastic main corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

77 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 28 9x9 brown floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Repair Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW gym storage room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

78 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x9 brown floor tile gym storage room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Repair Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

79 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 29 9x9 brown floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Repair Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: HIGH gym storage room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

80 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ x9 brown floor tile mastic gym storage room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Repair Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

81 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 30 brown carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: main office area COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

82 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ brown carpet mastic main office area In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

83 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 31 purple carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st floor classrooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

84 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ purple carpet mastic 1st floor classrooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

85 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 32 drywall HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pumproom (1902) and corridors COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

86 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ drywall pumproom (1902) and corridors In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

87 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 33 drywall compound HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

88 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ drywall compound pump room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

89 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 34 drywall HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1938 main corridor COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

90 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ drywall 1938 main corridor In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

91 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 36 stucco ceiling plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: main corridor COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

92 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ stucco ceiling plaster main corridor In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

93 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 37 stucco ceiling plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: corridors and classrooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

94 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ stucco ceiling plaster corridors and classrooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

95 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 38 transite table tops HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: classroom COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

96 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/ transite table tops classroom In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

97 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION A fiberglass duct wrap HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low mechanical room, building 1961 COMMENTS: Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

98 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 A fiberglass duct wrap mechanical room, building 1961 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

99 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION B duct expansion joint HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: No ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: mechanical room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

100 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 B duct expansion joint mechanical room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

101 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION C fiberglass insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Not Tested FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: COMMENTS: Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

102 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 C fiberglass insulation In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

103 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION E univents HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW 1961 building 38 EA EA COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

104 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 E univents 1961 building 38 EA 0 EA In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

105 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION F boiler insulation under metal jacklet HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW boiler room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

106 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 F boiler insulation under metal jacklet boiler room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

107 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION G tank insulation - material removed HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump room COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

108 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 G tank insulation - material removed pump room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

109 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION H aircell pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW fan room LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

110 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 H aircell pipe insulation fan room LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

111 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION I fiberglass insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Not Tested FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump room COMMENTS: Fiberglass Not Suspect Material Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

112 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 I fiberglass insulation pump room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

113 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION J fittings on fiberglass HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW 1902 building 100 JOINTS JOINTS COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

114 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 J fittings on fiberglass 1902 building 100 JOINTS 0 JOINTS In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

115 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION K cardboard insulation - REMOVED HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

116 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 K cardboard insulation - REMOVED boiler room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

117 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION L cardboard joint insulation- REMOVED HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1902 building COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

118 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 L cardboard joint insulation- REMOVED 1902 building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

119 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION M aircell duct insulation - REMOVED HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: fan room COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

120 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 M aircell duct insulation - REMOVED fan room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

121 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION N hot water tank insulation-removed HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: tank room COMMENTS: Material Not Observed Removed Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

122 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 N hot water tank insulation-removed tank room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

123 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION O duct expansion joint HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: fan room COMMENTS: Material Not Observed 2013 Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

124 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 O duct expansion joint fan room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

125 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION P pre-form pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW coal room LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

126 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 P pre-form pipe insulation coal room LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

127 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION Q duct insulation jacket HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW crawlspace below auditorium stage 75 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

128 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 Q duct insulation jacket crawlspace below auditorium stage 75 LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

129 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION R aircell joint insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW boiler/pump room LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

130 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 R aircell joint insulation boiler/pump room LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

131 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION S preform pipe joint insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: No RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW coal room LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

132 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 S preform pipe joint insulation coal room LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

133 Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Keith Clough INSPECTION DATE: 3/29/2013 INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION T Aircell pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Operations and Maintenance ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: LOW 1902 bldg - Pump room 40 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 03/29/2013

134 Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 4/16/2013 T Aircell pipe insulation 1902 bldg - Pump room 40 LF 0 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Operations and Maintenance Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 04/16/2013

135

136 APPENDIX B Inspector and Management Planner Licenses

137

138

139

140

141