KNOTWOOD, A DIVISION OF OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL MIAMI-DADE TEST REPORT

Transcription

1 KNOTWOOD, A DIVISION OF OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL MIAMI-DADE TEST REPORT SCOPE OF WORK TAS 201, TAS 202, AND TAS 203 TESTING ON KNOTWOOD, ALUMINUM POWDER-COATED CLADDING REPORT NUMBER I TEST DATE(S) 07/18/18 07/20/18 ISSUE DATE 08/21/18 REVISED DATE 01/17/19 RECORD RETENTION END DATE 07/20/28 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY NOTIFICATION NO. ATI LABORATORY CERTIFICATION NO PAGES 23 DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER ATI (08/21/17) RT-R-AMER-Test INTERTEK

2 REPORT ISSUED TO KNOTWOOD, A DIVISION OF OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL 3449 Hempland Road Lancaster, Pennsylvania SECTION 1 SCOPE Intertek Building & Construction (B&C) was contracted by Knotwood, a division of OmniMax International to perform TAS 201, TAS 202, and TAS 203 testing in accordance with Miami-Dade County requirements on their Knotwood, Aluminum Powder-Coated Cladding. Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test method(s). Testing was conducted at the Intertek B&C test facility in York, Pennsylvania. This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. SECTION 2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS The specimen(s) tested met the performance requirements set forth in the protocols. Product Type: Aluminum Powder-Coated Cladding Series/Model: Knotwood SPEC. TEST PROTOCOL RESULTS / psf TAS 202 2, 3, 4 TAS 201 (Large Missile) 2, 3, 4 TAS 203 Pass / psf For INTERTEK B&C: TITLE: Andrew P. Mehalick Technician Product Testing SIGNATURE: DATE: 01/17/19 COMPLETED BY: REVIEWED BY: Daniel C. Culbert, P.E. TITLE: Senior Project Engineer SIGNATURE: DATE: 01/17/19 APM:wnl :55:10-05'00' This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample(s) tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. Version: 08/21/17 Page 2 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

3 SECTION 3 TEST METHOD(S) The specimens were evaluated in accordance with the following: TAS , Impact Test Procedures TAS , Criteria for Testing Impact & Non Impact Resistant Building Envelope Components Using Uniform Static Air Pressure TAS , Criteria for Testing Products Subject to Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading SECTION 4 MATERIAL SOURCE/INSTALLATION Test specimens were provided by the client. Representative samples of the test specimen(s) will be retained by Intertek B&C for a minimum of ten years from the test completion date. The specimen was installed into a Spruce-Pine-Fir 2x6 stud wood test wall. The wall was clad with one layer of 1/2" thick DensGlass Gold exterior gypsum. The gypsum was installed with #8 x 1-5/8" flat head dry wall screws spaced 6" on center about the perimeter of the sheet and 12" on center in the field of the sheet. The gypsum was penetrated with six 4" diameter holes to allow pressurization of the exterior cladding. Installation of the tested product was performed by the client. A 1-5/8" tall starter strip was utilized at the top of the cladding system. Each consecutive panel was interlocked and secured with the installation clips spaced at 24" on center and into a wood stud. Test Specimen #1 utilized fourteen courses while Test Specimens #2, #3, #4 utilized four courses. The bottom and sides of the system utilized a 2-7/16" tall snap-in cover plate to conceal the installation clips. LOCATION ANCHOR DESCRIPTION ANCHOR LOCATION Studs Bottom and sides 1-3/4" wide by 1-1/8" tall aluminum clip with a #10 x 2-1/2" hex head screw with an insulated washer #10 x 1-5/8" flathead screws The anchors were located 24" on center at the bottom of each course at each stud location. The anchors were located 4" from each end of the trim base plates and spaced 8" on center through the base plates and into the side studs bottom plate. Version: 08/21/17 Page 3 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

4 SECTION 5 EQUIPMENT Cannon: Constructed from steel piping utilizing compressed air to propel the missile Missile: 2x4 Southern Pine Timing Device: Electronic beam type Cycling Mechanism: Computer controlled centrifugal blower with electronic pressure measuring device Deflection Measuring Device: Linear transducers SECTION 6 LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS NAME Natalie Hall Matt Stetler Timothy J. McGill Joseph A. Reed, P.E. Andrew P. Mehalick COMPANY Fabral, a division of OmniMax International Fabral, a division of OmniMax International Intertek B&C Intertek B&C Intertek B&C SECTION 7 TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION Product Type: Aluminum Powder-Coated Cladding Series/Model: Knotwood Product Size(s): Test Specimen #1: OVERALL AREA: WIDTH HEIGHT 5.9 m² (64.0 ft 2 ) millimeters inches millimeters inches Overall size Panel size (14) Test Specimens #2, #3, and #4: OVERALL AREA: WIDTH HEIGHT 1.8 m² (19.0 ft 2 ) millimeters inches millimeters inches Overall size /2 Panel size (4) Version: 08/21/17 Page 4 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

5 SECTION 8 TEST RESULTS Protocol TAS , Static Air Pressure Test Date(s): 07/19/18 The temperature range during testing was 26 C - 28 C (79 F - 82 F). The results are tabulated as follows: Test Specimen #1: Preload and Design Load per TAS 202 LOAD INDICATOR DEFLECTION (in.) PERMANENT SET (in.) (psf) LOCATION MEASURED ALLOWED MEASURED ALLOWED N/A 0.05 N/A 50% of Test Pressure N/A 0.05 N/A Design Pressure % of Test Pressure Design Pressure N/A 0.03 N/A N/A 0.07 N/A N/A 0.07 N/A N/A 0.05 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A N/A 0.02 N/A Test Specimen #1: Structural Overload Load per TAS 202 LOAD INDICATOR DEFLECTION (in.) PERMANENT SET (in.) (psf) LOCATION MEASURED ALLOWED MEASURED ALLOWED N/A 0.11 N/A Test Pressure N/A 0.11 N/A Test Pressure N/A 0.07 N/A N/A 0.03 N/A N/A 0.04 N/A N/A 0.03 N/A Note 1: Positive and negative uniform static load test loads were held for 30 seconds. Note 2: Tape and film were used to seal against air leakage during structural testing. In our opinion, the tape and film did not influence the results of the test. Note 3: See Sketch #1 for indicator locations. Version: 08/21/17 Page 5 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

6 Protocol TAS , Large Missile Impact Procedures Test Date(s): 07/20/18 The temperature range during testing was 27 C (80 F - 81 F). The results are tabulated as follows: Test Specimen #2 IMPACT # MISSILE WEIGHT (lbs.) MISSILE LENGTH (in.) MISSILE VELOCITY (ft./sec.) NOTE , , 6 Test Specimen #3 IMPACT # MISSILE WEIGHT (lbs.) MISSILE LENGTH (in.) MISSILE VELOCITY (ft./sec.) NOTE , , 6 Test Specimen #4 IMPACT # MISSILE WEIGHT (lbs.) MISSILE LENGTH (in.) MISSILE VELOCITY (ft./sec.) NOTE , , 6 Note 4: See Sketch #2 for impact locations. Note 5: Observations: Missile impacted target location, dented target area, no further damage observed. Note 6: Observations: Missile impacted target location, dented target area, cracked the gypsum board behind the test specimen, no penetration by the missile, no further damage observed. Version: 08/21/17 Page 6 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

7 Protocol TAS , Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Date(s): 07/20/18 The temperature during testing was 28 C (83 F). The results are tabulated as follows: Test Specimen #2: Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time per TAS 203 DESIGN PRESSURE STAGE / psf POSITIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES NEGATIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES Test Specimen #2: Positive Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR MAXIMUM PERMANENT PERCENT RECOVERY LOCATION DEFLECTION (in.) SET (in.) MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Test Specimen #2: Negative Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR LOCATION MAXIMUM DEFLECTION (in.) PERMANENT SET (in.) PERCENT RECOVERY MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Note 7: See Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Test Specimens #2, #3, and #4 were cycled in a common chamber. Version: 08/21/17 Page 7 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

8 Test Specimen #3: Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time per TAS 203 DESIGN PRESSURE STAGE / psf POSITIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES NEGATIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES Test Specimen #3: Positive Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR MAXIMUM PERMANENT PERCENT RECOVERY LOCATION DEFLECTION (in.) SET (in.) MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Test Specimen #3: Negative Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR MAXIMUM PERMANENT PERCENT RECOVERY LOCATION DEFLECTION (in.) SET (in.) MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Note 8: See Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Test Specimens #2, #3, and #4 were cycled in a common chamber. Version: 08/21/17 Page 8 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

9 Test Specimen #4: Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time per TAS 203 DESIGN PRESSURE STAGE / psf POSITIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES NEGATIVE PRESSURE RANGE (psf) AVERAGE CYCLE TIME (sec.) N/A NUMBER OF CYCLES Test Specimen #4: Positive Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR MAXIMUM PERMANENT PERCENT RECOVERY LOCATION DEFLECTION (in.) SET (in.) MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Test Specimen #4: Negative Cyclic Load per TAS 203 INDICATOR MAXIMUM PERMANENT PERCENT RECOVERY LOCATION DEFLECTION (in.) SET (in.) MEASURED % ALLOWED % > > > 90 Note 9: See Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Test Specimens #2, #3, and #4 were cycled in a common chamber. Version: 08/21/17 Page 9 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

10 SECTION 9 CONCLUSIONS The large missiles impacted each intended target. Each impact location was carefully inspected. No signs of penetration, rupture, or opening after the large missile impact test were observed; as such, each test specimen satisfies the large missile requirements of TAS 201. Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS met the requirements of Section 1626 of the Florida Building Code, Building. No signs of failure were observed in any area of the test specimen during the TAS 202 testing; as such, the test specimen satisfies the requirements of TAS 202. Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS met the requirements of Section 1620 of the Florida Building Code, Building. No signs of failure were observed in any area of the test specimens during the cyclic load test; as such, the test specimens satisfy the cyclic load requirements of TAS 203. Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS met the requirements of Section 1625 of the Florida Building Code, Building. Version: 08/21/17 Page 10 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

11 SECTION 10 SKETCH(ES) Sketch No. 1 TAS 202 Indicator Locations Version: 08/21/17 Page 11 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

12 Sketch No. 2 TAS 201 Impact Locations Version: 08/21/17 Page 12 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

13 Sketch No. 3 TAS 203 Indicator Locations Version: 08/21/17 Page 13 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

14 SECTION 11 PHOTOGRAPH Photo No. 1 Test Specimen #1 Prior to Testing Version: 08/21/17 Page 14 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

15 SECTION 12 DRAWINGS The test specimen drawings have been reviewed by Intertek B&C and are representative of the test specimen(s) reported herein. Test specimen construction was verified by Intertek B&C per the drawings included in this report. Any deviations are documented herein or on the drawings. Version: 08/21/17 Page 15 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23 SECTION 13 REVISION LOG REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION 0 08/21/18 N/A Original Report Issue 1 01/17/19 1, 2 Changed customer name from "Fabral, a Division of Omnimax International" to "Knotwood, a Division of Omnimax International" Version: 08/21/17 Page 23 of 23 RT-R-AMER-Test-2816