ASBESTOS INSPECTION FOR LASALLE ROAD MONTROSE, CO

Transcription

1 ASBESTOS INSPECTION FOR LASALLE ROAD MONTROSE, CO Prepared for: Montrose County 949 N. 2 nd Street Montrose, CO Prepared by:

2 July 27, 2018 Montrose County 949 N. 2 nd Street Montrose, CO Attn.: Mr. Kenneth Norris, PE, MBA Re: Asbestos Inspection LaSalle Road Montrose, CO Empirical Project No Dear Mr. Norris: The purpose of this report is to present the results of the asbestos containing material testing performed on June 20 th & 21 st, 2018 at the above referenced location. This asbestos testing was conducted prior to residential renovation or moving activities. If this residence will be demolished, additional testing will need to be completed prior to receiving a demolition permit. Empirical appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Montrose County. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at Sincerely, Empirical Environmental, LLC Sheila D. Sealander IAQ Manager Empirical Environmental, LLC

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ASBESTOS TESTING Scope of Services Building Description Sample Collection and Results Residence Sample Results Summary Regulatory Review CONCLUSIONS LIMITATIONS... 8 Appendix A - Certifications Appendix B - Areas Appendix C - Asbestos Laboratory Results Appendix D - Asbestos Site Diagrams Appendix E - Photographs of ACM

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An asbestos Inspection was performed at the residence located at LaSalle Road in Montrose, Colorado. This inspection was performed prior to moving and/or renovation activities in the residence. This subject site consisted of a residence and eight (8) outbuildings. The outbuildings were tested for demolition and the results were provided in a separate report dated July 16, Thirty-eight samples, from 27 homogeneous areas, were collected for this inspection. The following samples were reported as asbestos containing materials: , , and : Multi-colored, small square patterned linoleum beneath carpet and/or tan square linoleum , , , , and : Sponge-like texture , , and : Swirly texture : 9 X9 Beige with black and gray spots floor tile : 9 X9 Teal streaked floor tile : 9 X9 Gray and tan speckled floor tile : 9 X9 Dark green floor tile : 9 X9 Green floor tile. Prior to renovation and/or moving these materials must be removed by a Certified Colorado Abatement Contractor if they will be impacted. Additionally, materials in those areas that will be demolished must be removed prior to demolition. After removal, the Certified Asbestos Building Inspector is required to sign the Demolition Permit stating that these materials have been removed. Empirical Environmental, LLC

5 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL INSPECTION LASALLE ROAD MONTROSE, COLORADO Empirical Project No INTRODUCTION The following report presents the results from the testing for asbestos containing materials (ACM) at the residential property located at LaSalle Road in Montrose, Colorado. The ACM testing was performed prior to renovation and/or moving activities. This testing event was not intended to be a demolition survey except for the areas labeled Bedroom 1, the Basement, and Cellar. This testing was performed in conformance with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment s (CDPHE s) Regulation No. 8, Part B, Asbestos (Reg. 8). It should be noted the outbuildings on the property were tested for ACMs and those results were submitted in a separate report dated July 16, ASBESTOS TESTING A visual survey and select bulk sample collection for ACMs were performed by Ms. Sheila Sealander. Ms. Sealander is a Colorado certified Asbestos Building Inspector, Certification Numbers A copy of the Inspector s certification is presented in Appendix A. Additionally, a copy of Empirical Environmental s Asbestos Firm certification is also presented in Appendix A. A visual survey and sampling for suspect materials were completed on June 20 th and 21 st, Sample nomenclature is as follows: XXXXX-YY-ZZ where XXXXX indicates the address of the subject site; YY indicates the homogeneous area number; and ZZ indicates the consecutive sample number. Bulk samples were collected from homogeneous areas at the subject site. A list of these homogeneous areas, along with the type of ACM, is included as Table 1, in Appendix B. The bulk samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc., located in Denver, Colorado for analysis of asbestos utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). EMSL Analytical, Inc. is an accredited laboratory for the analysis of bulk asbestos samples and is a member of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP # ). EMSL s NVLAP certification is presented in Appendix A. The laboratory results are presented in Appendix C. This report is based on the bulk sample analysis results. Suspect materials are considered positive for asbestos if the material contains greater than 1% asbestos. As required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) National Emissions Empirical Environmental, LLC

6 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, point counting analysis should be performed if the analyst detects asbestos in the sample and estimates the amount by visual estimation to be less than 10%, or the owner or operator of the building may either assume the amount to be greater than 1% and treat the material as ACM or require the verification of the amount by point counting. 2.1 Scope of Services The ACM testing included a visual inspection of suspected ACM, bulk sample collection of suspect ACM, and sample analysis of collected bulk samples. The purpose of this testing was to identify ACMs prior to moving and/or renovating of the residence. 2.2 Building Description The subject site consisted of one (1) residence and eight (8) outbuildings. The outbuildings were tested and the results were submitted in a separate report dated July 16, According to the Montrose County Assessor, the residence was originally constructed in the 1920 s and between 1950 and 1976 the porches were enclosed and an addition was added. The residence is approximately 1,272 square feet in size. The floors appeared to be on a wood sub-floor with linoleum and/or carpet and the walls appeared to be drywall. The Basement and Cellar appeared to be constructed of Concrete Masonry Units (CMUs) and/or concrete with wood ceilings. The Cellar floor appeared to have vinyl tiles on the concrete. The exterior of the residence appeared to be brick veneer over wood siding. The roofing appeared to be asphalt shingles. A site diagram depicting the subject site is presented in Appendix D. 2.3 Sample Collection and Results After a visual inspection, samples were collected in accordance with the sampling protocols outlined Reg. 8. A homogeneous area is defined by Reg. 8 as an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture. Thirty-eight samples were collected from 27 homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A list of homogeneous areas along with the type of ACM is located in Appendix B. Building materials identified as glass, concrete, wood, rubber, fiberglass or metal are not considered suspect ACM. Empirical Environmental, LLC 2

7 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 Walls Residence The walls in the residence appeared to have drywall construction consisting of texture, joint compound, tape and sheetrock. One (1) homogenous drywall system was observed on the walls. The texture of this drywall system appeared to have a sponge-like texture. Five (5) samples were collected from this drywall at the following locations: the southwest corner in the closet in the Family Room (sample number ); the northeast corner in the east closet in Bedroom 1 (sample number ); the southeast corner behind the door in the Bathroom (sample number ); the southeast corner in the closet in Bedroom 2 (sample number ); and the southeast corner in Stairway #2 (sample number ). The joint compound in these samples was reported as containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos. In accordance with the EPA s NESHAP regulation When joint compound and/or tape is applied to wallboard it becomes an integral part of the wallboard and in effect becomes one material forming a wall system. Therefore, where a demolition or renovation impacts such a wall system, a composite analysis of the wall system (percent of asbestos in the joint compound, tape and wallboard) should be conducted. The laboratory was requested to composite the sheetrock, tape, and joint compound in these samples. The composite sample results were <1% and would not be considered ACM. The textures in these samples was reported as containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos. Texture cannot be composited with the other materials in the drywall system, therefore the laboratory was requested to point count the textures. If one (1) texture sample was reported with an asbestos content greater than 1%, the laboratory would not count remaining texture samples since all the texture would be considered ACM. The laboratory point counted the texture in sample number and reported the texture contained 1.75% Chrysotile asbestos. The texture on the walls in the residence would be considered ACM. This texture would also be considered friable. Friable is defined by Regulation 8 as that material, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, and includes previously nonfriable material after such previously nonfriable material becomes damaged to the extent that when dry it may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Laboratory results are presented in Appendix C. A site diagram depicting the approximate sample locations is presented in Appendix D. Photographs of ACMs are presented in Appendix E. Two (2) types of ceramic wall tiles were observed in the residence. The first wall tile system consisted of a pattern of green and light green heart shaped tiles and white small square shaped tiles and was observed in the Bathroom. One (1) sample was collected from each color from the south wall. Sample number consisted of green heart tile, mesh and mastic; sample number consisted of light green heart tile, mesh and mastic; and sample number consisted of white square tile, mesh and mastic. These samples were reported as Empirical Environmental, LLC 3

8 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 not containing asbestos. The second wall tile was observed in the shower/tub area of the Bathroom and was white wall tile with yellow mastic. One (1) sample was collected from the north wall, sample number , and was reported as not containing asbestos. Metal sheeting that imitated ceramic wall tile was observed in the Kitchen. The mastic that adhered the metal to the wall was sampled from east side of the south wall, sample number The laboratory reported this mastic as not containing asbestos. Ceilings Two (2) homogeneous ceilings were observed in the residence. These ceilings were drywall systems comprised of texture, joint compound, tape and sheetrock. The first drywall system had the sponge-like texture that was observed on the walls and would be considered ACM. The second type appeared to have a swirly texture and was observed in the Family Room and Bedrooms. Three (3) samples were collected from the ceilings with the swirly texture in the following areas: sample number was collected in the Family Room from the south wall by the west window; sample number was collected by the east wall in Bedroom 1; and sample number was collected by the west wall in Bedroom 2. The joint compound in these samples was reported as containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos. The laboratory was requested to composite the sheetrock, tape, and joint compound in these samples. The composite sample results were <1% and would not be considered ACM. The texture in these samples was reported as containing 2% Chrysotile asbestos. The laboratory was requested to point count the textures until they counted a positive result. The laboratory point counted the texture in sample number and reported the texture contained 2.00% Chrysotile asbestos. The texture on these ceilings would be considered friable ACM. Floors Three (3) types of linoleum were observed in the residence. The first type was a tan, square patterned linoleum observed in the Kitchen, Bathroom, and Laundry. Beneath this tan linoleum was a multicolored, small square patterned linoleum. This linoleum also appeared to be beneath the carpet in the Family Room, Bedroom 1, Hallway, and in the closet of Bedroom 2. The tan and multi-colored linoleums were sampled together from the following areas: the southwest corner in the Kitchen closet (sample number ); the southwest corner in the Bathroom (sample number ; and the northeast corner of the west closet in the Laundry. The tan square linoleum and mastic were reported as not containing asbestos. The multi-colored, small square patterned linoleum was reported as containing 10% - 15% Chrysotile asbestos. The paper backing on linoleum is considered friable. A photograph showing this linoleum is presented in Appendix E. The third type of linoleum was beige with gold speckles and was observed at the Empirical Environmental, LLC 4

9 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 top of Stairway #2. This linoleum was sampled in the southeast corner, sample number The linoleum and mastic were reported as not containing asbestos. Tan and beige carpet was observed in the Bedrooms, Hallway and Family Room. Two (2) samples were collected from this carpet and the pad beneath the carpet. Sample number was collected from the northeast corner in the Family Room closet and sample number was collected from the northwest corner in Bedroom 1. These samples were reported as not containing asbestos. The floors were not breached during this sampling event, however a floor register was removed in the Kitchen and a tar paper was observed beneath the sub-floor. This paper was sampled, sample number , and was reported as not containing asbestos. Five (5) colors of 9 X9 floor tile were observed in the Cellar. One (1) sample was collected from each color of floor tile: beige tile with black and gray spots with black mastic, sample number ; teal streaked with black mastic, sample number ; gray and tan speckled with black mastic, sample number ; dark green with black mastic, sample number ; and green with black mastic, sample number These floor tiles were reported with 3% - 8% Chrysotile asbestos and the mastic was reported as not containing asbestos. These tiles, when intact, would not be considered friable, however there were several tiles that were broken and crumbling that could be considered friable. Photographs of these floor tiles are presented in Appendix E. Two (2) types of carpet were observed in the Cellar. The first was a gray carpet with pink and blue flowers and the other was a tan and gray striped carpet. These carpets were sampled, sample numbers and , respectively. These samples were reported as not containing asbestos. Miscellaneous One (1) type of caulk was observed in the residence. This caulk was white and was observed in the Bathroom. One (1) sample was collected from the back of the sink, sample number This sample was reported as not containing asbestos. Black insulation and two (2) types of gaskets were observed on the bottom side of the Kitchen sink. The black insulation was sampled, sample number This insulation was reported to have 8% Chrysotile asbestos. The gaskets were located where the drain pipes connected to the sink. Sample number was a brown colored gasket and sample number was a white colored gasket. These gaskets were reported as not containing asbestos. Empirical Environmental, LLC 5

10 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 Two (2) samples were collected in the Utility Room in the basement. The first sample was plumber s tape and was collected from a pipe to the furnace, sample number The other sample consisted of pipe dope and was collected from a pipe to the furnace, sample number These samples were reported as not containing asbestos. Exterior The exterior siding of the residence appeared to be brick veneer over wood siding. An area where the brick was not covering the wood siding revealed a tar-paper barrier that appeared to be between the brick and the wood. This tar paper was sampled from the south side by the chimney, sample number This sample was reported as not containing asbestos. The roof appeared to be composed of wood with brown composite roof shingles. These shingles, and the roof felt beneath them, were sampled from the northeast corner of the residence, sample number This sample was reported as not containing asbestos. caulk was observed around the windows. This caulk was sampled at the east window, north of the front door (sample number ) and was reported as not containing asbestos. The laboratory report is presented in Appendix C and a site diagram is presented in Appendix D. 2.4 Sample Results Summary Upon completion of the asbestos inspection and review of the sample results, asbestos containing materials (ACMs) were reported in the following samples: , , and : Multi-colored, small square patterned linoleum beneath carpet and tan square linoleum , , , , and : Sponge-like texture , , and : Swirly texture : 9 X9 Beige with black and gray spots floor tile : 9 X9 Teal streaked floor tile : 9 X9 Gray and tan speckled floor tile : 9 X9 Dark green floor tile : 9 X9 Green floor tile. Empirical Environmental, LLC 6

11 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, 2018 Photographs of ACMs are presented in Appendix E. Field sketches of the building were prepared by Empirical to show the relative locations of the samples collected. These field sketches should not be considered scaled and are provided for illustration purposes only. These field sketches, or figures, with sample locations are included in Appendix D. 2.5 Regulatory Review In the state of Colorado, asbestos activities are regulated by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) under Regulation No. 8, Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Colorado Air Quality Control Division, Section III, Part 6. Regulation 8 requires that any asbestos related activity conducted in a public or commercial building be performed by certified personnel. Friable ACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that will disturb the material. If the amount of removed ACMs exceeds 260 linear feet on pipes, or more than 160 square feet on other materials, or a volume equivalent to a 55-gallon drum, the owner or operator must provide CDPHE with written notification of planned removal activities at least 10 working days prior to the start of abatement activities. Abatement activities must be conducted by a Colorado certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC). Air clearances must be conducted by a certified Air Monitoring Specialist independent of the GAC. A demolition permit must be obtained from CDPHE prior to demolition activities even if asbestos is not found in a building. A demolition permit typically takes 10 working days and must be signed by the asbestos building inspector. The areas slated to be demolished are Bedroom 1, the Utility Room in the basement, and the Cellar. If other areas are to be demolished, additional samples will need to be collected and walls and floors will need to be breached. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the ACM results, asbestos containing materials were reported at the subject site. These materials must be removed prior to renovation or moving if these materials will be impacted. The analyses and opinions expressed in this report are based upon data collected along with other information described in this report. This report does not reflect variation, which may occur across the site. Empirical Environmental, LLC 7

12 ACM Testing LaSalle Rd. Montrose, CO July 27, LIMITATIONS Empirical has performed ACM testing at the subject site. Empirical has endeavored to assess the existing conditions at the subject site using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by consultants practicing in this, or similar locality. Results presented in this report are based on analytical data obtained for specific sampling locations at the time of this survey. Other sampling data at a different time or location may provide different results. Empirical used analytical results to assess whether ACMs were present in the buildings. Empirical does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies or other third parties supplying information which may have been used during the preparation of this report. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Montrose County for specific application to the subject property. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are made or intended. The material contained herein shall not, in whole or in part, be disseminated or conveyed to any other party or be used or relied upon by any other party without Empirical s written consent. In the event that any changes in the nature or location of suspected ACM as outlined in this report are observed, the conclusion and recommendations contained in this report shall not be valid unless these changes are reviewed and the opinions of this report are modified or verified in writing by Empirical. Empirical Environmental, LLC 8

13 APPENDIX A CERTIFICATIONS

14

15

16

17

18 APPENDIX B HOMOGENEOUS AREAS

19 Table 1 ASBESTOS INVENTORY July 2018 Page 1 of 3 Areas Tested at LaSalle Road, Montrose, CO HA NUMBER 1 DESCRIPTION MATERIAL TYPE ASBESTOS / FRIABLE Tan square linoleum with yellow mastic and multi-colored linoleum with mastic Miscellaneous YES / YES 2 Tan & Beige Carpet and pad Miscellaneous NO / NO LOCATION Kitchen, Bathroom, Laundry, Family Room, Bedroom 1, Hall, and Bedroom 2 closet APPROXIMATE QUANTITY 980 SF Family Room, Bedrooms 1 & SF 3 Tar paper between flooring Miscellaneous NO / NO Kitchen 196 SF 4 5 Texture (sponge), Joint Compound, Tape, and Sheetrock Surfacing YES / YES Texture (swirly), Joint Compound, Tape, and Sheetrock Surfacing YES / YES Family Room, Bedrooms 1 & 2, Bathroom, Stair 2 2,750 SF Ceilings in Family Room, Bedrooms 1 & SF 6 Caulk Miscellaneous NO / NO Bathroom 50 LF 7 Green heart wall tile, mesh and yellow mastic Miscellaneous NO / NO Bathroom 12 SF 8 Lt. Green heart wall tile, mesh, and yellow mastic Miscellaneous NO / NO Bathroom 12 SF 9 Small white square wall tile, mesh, and yellow mastic Miscellaneous NO / NO Bathroom 12 SF 10 wall tile with yellow mastic Miscellaneous NO / NO Bathroom 60 SF 11 Black spray-on sink insulation Surfacing YES / NO Kitchen 6 SF Empirical Environmental, LLC

20 Table 1 ASBESTOS INVENTORY July 2018 Page 2 of 3 Areas Tested at LaSalle Road, Montrose, CO HA NUMBER DESCRIPTION MATERIAL TYPE ASBESTOS / FRIABLE LOCATION APPROXIMATE QUANTITY 12 Sink Gasket #1 Miscellaneous NO / NO Kitchen <1 SF 13 Sink Gasket #2 Miscellaneous NO / NO Kitchen <1 SF 14 Beige with gold speckles linoleum Miscellaneous NO / NO Stair #2 12 SF 15 Exterior Caulk Miscellaneous NO / NO Windows 456 SF X9 Beige with black and gray floor tile with black mastic Miscellaneous YES/ NO Cellar 51 SF 9X9 Teal streaked floor tile with black mastic Miscellaneous YES/ NO Cellar 7 SF 9X9 gray and tan speckled floor tile with black mastic Miscellaneous YES/ NO Cellar 24 SF 9X9 dark green floor tile with black mastic Miscellaneous YES/ NO Cellar 33 SF 20 9X9 green floor tile with black mastic Miscellaneous YES/ NO Cellar 14 SF 21 Gray carpet with flowers Miscellaneous NO / NO Cellar 32 SF 22 Striped carpet Miscellaneous NO / NO Cellar 8 SF 23 Roof shingles and felt Miscellaneous NO / NO Roof 1,200 SF Empirical Environmental, LLC

21 Table 1 ASBESTOS INVENTORY July 2018 Page 3 of 3 Areas Tested at LaSalle Road, Montrose, CO HA NUMBER DESCRIPTION MATERIAL TYPE ASBESTOS / FRIABLE LOCATION APPROXIMATE QUANTITY 24 Exterior black tar paper Miscellaneous NO / NO Between brick and siding 990 SF 25 Mastic behind metal "tile" Miscellaneous NO / NO Kitchen 39 SF 26 Plumber's Tape Miscellaneous NO / NO Basement <1 LF 27 Pipe Dope Miscellaneous NO / NO Basement <1 LF Empirical Environmental, LLC

22 APPENDIX C LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY

23 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Floorin g Mastic A Floorin g B Floorin g Mastic A Floorin g B Floorin g Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Kitchen Closet S. W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Kitchen Closet S. W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Kitchen Closet S. W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Bathroom S.W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Bathroom S.W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Bathroom S.W. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Laundry W. Closet N.E. Corner Tan Yellow Non- Various Gray/Tan Tan Non- Various Gray/Tan 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Chrysotile 15% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 1 of 12

24 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Mastic A Floorin g B Carpet Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Laundry W. Closet N.E. Corner Tan SQ. Linoleum + Yellow Mastic, Small Multi-colored linoleum + Mastic Laundry W. Closet N.E. Corner Tan + Beige Carpet + Pap Family Room Closet N.E. Corner Tan Non- Gray Tan/Beige 90% Non-fibrous (Other) 95% Synthetic 5% Non-fibrous (Other) 10% Chrysotile Pad A Tan + Beige Carpet + Pap Family Room Closet N.E. Corner Brown/Tan Non Carpet Tan + Beige Carpet + Pap Bed 1 N.W. Corner Tan 90% Synthetic 10% Non-fibrous (Other) Pad A Tan + Beige Carpet + Pap Bed 1 N.W. Corner Brown/Tan Non Tar Paper between Flooring Kitchen at Floor Register Black 65% Cellulose 35% Non-fibrous (Other) Textur e Tape A Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Non- 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 2 of 12

25 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Joint Compound B Sheetr ock C Comp osite D Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Non- Brown/ Brown/ Heterogeneous 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock 2% Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile Textur e Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Non- Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Tape A Joint Compound B Sheetr ock C Comp osite D Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Tan Non- Brown/ Brown/ Heterogeneous 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock 2% Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 3 of 12

26 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Textur e Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner Non- 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis Tape A Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) Joint Compound B Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner Non- 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Sheetr ock C Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner Brown/ 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) Comp osite D Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner Brown/ Heterogeneous 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock Textur e Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Non- Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Tape A Joint Compound B Sheetr ock C Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Non- Brown/ 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 4 of 12

27 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Comp osite D Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Brown/ Heterogeneous 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock <1% Chrysotile Textur e Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner Non- 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis Tape A Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) Joint Compound B Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner Non- 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Sheetr ock C Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner Brown/ 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) Compo site D Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner Brown/ Heterogeneous 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock Textur e Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window Non- Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Tape A Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 5 of 12

28 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Joint Compound B Sheetr ock C Comp osite D Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window Non- Brown/ Brown/ 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock 2% Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile Textur e Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Non- Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Tape A Joint Compound B Sheetr ock C Comp osite D Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Non- Brown/ Brown/ Heterogeneous 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock 2% Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 6 of 12

29 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Textur e Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Non- Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile Tape A Joint Compound B Dryw all C Comp osite D Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Non- Brown/ Brown/ Heterogeneous 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 20% Non-fibrous (Other) 20% Cellulose 65% Gypsum 15% Non-fibrous (Other) This is a composite of Tape, Joint Compound and Sheetrock 2% Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile Caulk Bath Sink Non Ceram ic Tile Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall /Green Non Mesh A Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Brown 95% Synthetic 5% Non-fibrous (Other) Mastic B Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Yellow Non- EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 7 of 12

30 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Ceram ic Tile Lt. Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall /Green Non Mesh A Lt. Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall 90% Synthetic 10% Non-fibrous (Other) Mastic B Lt. Green Heart Wall Tile, Mesh + Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Yellow Non Ceram ic Tile Small Square Wall Tile, Mesh, Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Non Mesh A Small Square Wall Tile, Mesh, Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall 85% Synthetic 15% Non-fibrous (Other) Mastic B Small Square Wall Tile, Mesh, Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Yellow Non Grout C Small Square Wall Tile, Mesh, Yellow Mastic Bath E. Wall Non Ceram ic Tile Wall Tile w/ Yellow Mastic Bath N. Wall Non Mastic A Wall Tile w/ Yellow Mastic Bath N. Wall Tan Non Black Sink Insulation Kitchen Sink Black Non- 92% Non-fibrous (Other) 8% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 8 of 12

31 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Sink Gasket #1- Brown Kitchen sink Brown Non- 75% Cellulose 25% Non-fibrous (Other) Sink Gasket #2- Kitchen sink Gray 98% Cellulose 2% Non-fibrous (Other) Floorin g Mastic A Beige w/ Gold Speckles Lino + 1 Addl Layer Stair 2 S.E. Corner Beige w/ Gold Speckles Lino + 1 Addl Layer Stair 2 S.E. Corner Ext. Caulk (Chalky) E. Window by Front Door Beige Brown Non- Tan Non- 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (Other) Floor Tile x9 Beige w/ Black + Gray F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Beige Non- 94% Non-fibrous (Other) 6% Chrysotile Mastic A 9x9 Beige w/ Black + Gray F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Black Non Floor Tile x9 Teal Streaked F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Blue/Green Non- 97% Non-fibrous (Other) 3% Chrysotile Mastic A 9x9 Teal Streaked F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Black Non Floor Tile x9 w/ Gray + Tan F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Gray Non- 97% Non-fibrous (Other) 3% Chrysotile EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 9 of 12

32 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Mastic A 9x9 w/ Gray + Tan F.T. + Black Mastic Cellar Black Non Floor Tile x9 Dk Green F.T. w/ Black Mastic Cellar Green Non- 92% Non-fibrous (Other) 8% Chrysotile Mastic A 9x9 Dk Green F.T. w/ Black Mastic Cellar Black Non Floor Tile x9 Green F.T. w/ Black Mastic Green Non- 94% Non-fibrous (Other) 6% Chrysotile Mastic A 9x9 Green F.T. w/ Black Mastic Black Non Gray w/ Flowers Carpet Gray 85% Synthetic 15% Non-fibrous (Other) Striped Carpets Brown/Tan 85% Synthetic 15% Non-fibrous (Other) Shingl e Roof Shingles & Felt Brown/Black Shingl e A Roof Shingles & Felt Brown/Red/Black 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (Other) Felt B Roof Shingles & Felt Black 85% Cellulose 15% Non-fibrous (Other) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 10 of 12

33 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Ext Black Paper between Brick & Wood Siding Brown/Black 75% Cellulose 25% Non-fibrous (Other) Mastic Behind Metal "tile" Yellow Non Plumber Tape Non Pipe Goop Gray Non- EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 11 of 12

34 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street Denver, CO Tel/Fax: (303) / (303) / denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: EMPR78 Attention: Sheila Sealander Phone: (719) Empirical Environmental Fax: (719) Ranch Hand Road Received Date: 06/22/ :30 AM Suite 103 Analysis Date: 06/25/ /29/2018 Peyton, CO Collected Date: 06/20/2018 Project: The samples in this report were submitted to EMSL for analysis by Asbestos Analysis of Bulk materials via EPA/600 (0513) Method using Polarized Light Microscopy. The reference number for these samples is the EMSL Order ID above. Please use this reference number when calling about these samples. Report Comments: Sample Receipt Date: Analysis Completed Date: 06/22/2018 Sample Receipt Time: 10:30 AM 06/29/2018 Analysis Completed Time: 10:12 AM Analyst(s): Molly Elkins PLM (92) Samples Reviewed and approved by: Amanda Lang, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Initial report from: 06/25/ :19:03 ASB_PLMwSigs_0007_0001 Printed:7/26/2018 8:40:43AM Page 12 of 12

35 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street, Denver, CO Phone/Fax: (303) / (303) denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMPR78 Attn: Sheila Sealander Empirical Environmental Ranch Hand Road Suite 103 Peyton, CO Phone: (719) Fax: (719) Received: 06/22/18 10:30 AM Analysis Date: 6/29/2018 Collected: 6/20/2018 Project: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Texture Compound + Sheet Rock Family Room Closet S.W. Corner Non % Non-fibrous (other) 1.75% Chrysotile Texture Compound + Sheet Rock Bed 1. E. Closet N.E. Corner Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Texture Compound + Sheetrock Bath S.E. Corner Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Texture Compound + Sheetrock Bed 2 Closet S.E Corner Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Texture Compound + Sheetrock Stair 2- S.E Corner Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Texture Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Family Room Ceilings S. Wall by Window Non % Non-fibrous (other) 2.00% Chrysotile Texture Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet Rock Bed 1, Middle by E. Wall Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Texture Swirly Ceiling Texture- Tape- JC + Sheet RockBed 2, Middle by W. Wall Positive Stop (Not Analyzed) Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government. EMSL Analytical Inc., bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.the test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Denver, CO NVLAP Lab Code Initial report from 06/25/ :19:03 Test Report PLMPTC-S Printed: 6/29/ :19:47 AM 1

36 EMSL Analytical, Inc Yuma Street, Denver, CO Phone/Fax: (303) / (303) denverlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMPR78 Attn: Sheila Sealander Empirical Environmental Ranch Hand Road Suite 103 Peyton, CO Phone: (719) Fax: (719) Received: 06/22/18 10:30 AM Analysis Date: 6/29/2018 Collected: 6/20/2018 Project: The Text0: samples in this report were submitted to EMSL for analysis by Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure. The reference number for these samples is the EMSL Order ID above. Please use this reference number when calling about these samples. Report Comments: Sample Receipt Date:: 6/22/2018 Sample Receipt Time: 10:30 AM Analysis Completed Date: 6/29/2018 Analyst(s): Analysis Completed Time: 10:00 AM Molly Elkins PLM 400 Point Count (2) Samples reviewed and approved by: Amanda Lang, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government. EMSL Analytical Inc., bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.the test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Denver, CO NVLAP Lab Code Initial report from 06/25/ :19:03 Test Report PLMPTC-S Printed: 6/29/ :19:47 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 2

37

38

39

40 APPENDIX D SITE DIAGRAM

41 Bedroom Utility Room N Family Room Project # Drawn by SDS Drawn July Laundry Kitchen Not to Scale Figure 1 - Site Diagram Empirical Environmental, LLC LaSalle Road Phone (719) Fax (719) Asbestos Containing Material Testing Montrose, Colorado Bedroom Bathroom Cellar Basement LEGEND Approximate location of asbestos sample <1.0 % Approximate location of asbestos sample > 1.0 %

42 APPENDIX E ACM PHOTOGRAPHS

43 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 1 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS , , and MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE Multi-colored small square linoleum Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 980 SF 10%-15% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC

44 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 2 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE , , , , and Texture (sponge) Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 2,750 SF 2% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS On Walls and some Ceilings Empirical Environmental, LLC

45 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 3 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS , , and MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE Texture (swirly) Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 794 SF 2% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Ceilings in the Family Room and Bedrooms Empirical Environmental, LLC

46 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 4 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE Spray-on Insulation Non-Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 6 SF 8% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC

47 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 5 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE 9X9 Beige with Black and Gray Floor Tile Non-Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 51 SF 6% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC

48 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 6 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE 9X9 Teal Streaked Floor Tile Non-Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 7 SF 3% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC

49 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 7 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE 9X9 Gray and Tan Speckled Floor Tile Non-Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 24 SF 3% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC

50 SAMPLE CONCLUSION LaSalle Rd. Montrose, Colorado Page 8 of 9 SAMPLE NUMBERS MATERIAL FRIABLE/NON-FRIABLE 9X9 Dark Green Floor Tile Non-Friable QUANTITY RESULTS Approximately 33 SF 8% Chrysotile asbestos REMARKS Empirical Environmental, LLC