AEC Project Execution Using GRID vgpu Enhanced Virtualization

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AEC Project Execution Using GRID vgpu Enhanced Virtualization"

Transcription

1 AEC Project Execution Using GRID vgpu Enhanced Virtualization [insert date] worldwide

2 WELCOME Randall Siggers AEC IT (17 yrs) Technical Research Analyst Solution Architect at NVIDIA 2

3 WELCOME Bill Dale Jacobs Engineering (A\E\C) Project Delivery Information Technology 3

4 WELCOME Bill Dale To share my experiences where virtualization has been applied for meaningful benefit in Project Delivery within the A\E\C environment 4

5 Disclaimer Important The material in this presentation has been prepared by Jacobs. Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this presentation vest exclusively with Jacobs. Apart from any use permitted under applicable copyright legislation, no part of this work may in any form or by any means (electronic, graphic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Jacobs is a trademark of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Copyright 2015 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. All rights reserved. 5

6 AGENDA AEC: BUILDINGS BUILDINGS:PROCESS INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY OUR CHALLENGE AND SOULTION what we do why how we do it matters an opportunity with issues the challenges to overcome how we delivered Q&A 6

7 7 A\E\C: BUILDINGS

8 A\E\C: BUILDINGS The process through which buildings are Designed Fabricated Constructed 8

9 PROCESS IS IMPORTANT when just one percent of a project s upfront costs are spent, up to 70% of its life-cycle costs may already be committed. 1 Importantly, the decisions made early in a project have a strong affect on the life cycle costs of a building. Operation and maintenance knowledge needs to be incorporated early in design to make these critical decisions P. Dahl, M. Horman, D. Riley, Lean Principles to inject Operations Knowledge into Design, 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference (2005) 2. P. Dahl, M. Horman, T. Pohlman, M. Pulaski, Evaluating design-build-operate-maintenance delivery as a tool for sustainability, Construction Research Congress (2005).

10 10 BUILDINGS: PROCESS

11 MACRO-PROCESS P D C O 11

12 DESIGN PHASE DESIGN 3D FINANCE: COORDINATION ESTIMATING, FUNDING, CONTROLS EXISTING CONDITIONS MODELING RECORD MODELING 3D COORDINATION EXISTING CONDITIONS MODELING AUTHORING PROJECT REQUIREMENTS CLIENT\ UNIQUE STANDARDS WORKFLOWS TOOLS REVIEW COMPLIANCE 12 ANALYSIS

13 3D COORDINATION mechanical hard checks 3d model review relevant disciplines locate actionable clashes coordinate repair D MECHANICAL 3D MODEL PLUMBING FIRE PROTECTION 13

14 14 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY (IPD)

15 IPD IS hyper-collaborative risk-and-reward-sharing co-location common data environment P D C O 15

16 IPD PROMISES cross-entity goal alignment predictable outcomes high quality product efficiency; change tolerance P D C O Of Ashcraft's 77 IPD projects, 75% are exceeding contractual targets for schedule, cost, quality or profitability N. Post, Integrated Project Delivery Can Work Well But Is Still No Utopia, Engineering News-Record (10-Jun-2015)

17 17 THE CHALLENGE

18 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY (IPD) P C O 18

19 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY (IPD) 3 rd PARTY FACILITY JACOBS FACILITY P C O D MECH 3D MODEL PLUMB FP 19

20 20 THE SOLUTION

21 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY (IPD) 3 rd PARTY FACILITY JACOBS FACILITY P C O 21

22 RESULTS efficient deployment of key resources secure access to multiple isolated environments real-time, virtual team integration P C O 22

23 23