Architectural Commission Report

Transcription

1 Architectural Commission Report D. DRAFT Approval Resolution C. Project Design Plans B. Detailed Design Description and Materials (Applicant Prepared) A. Project Plans Approved April 15, 2015 Attachment(s): Report Author and Contact Information: (310) Fernando SoIls, Associate Planner for the canopy structure that illuminate the canopy in contrasting white and blue lighting. The applicant has provided a fully detailed lighting plan which includes the central two-story canopy and wall sconces along the first story. The proposal includes two variations of lighting for final review and approval. A full illumination plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Architectural Commission included a condition of approval that required: As part of the original approval Architectural Review Permit, the Architectural Commission Lighting Plan façade and potted Ficus benjamina are proposed along the southern edge of the roof. The applicant has provided a final roof impacts caused by the lunch area(s). A landscape planter is proposed along the third-story plan and landscape plan to mitigate any potential visual approved by the Architectural Commission. viewed from adjacent buildings. Final materials and landscaping shall be reviewed and The roof of the rooftop lunchroom shall be landscaped to mitigate visual impacts when included a condition of approval that required: As part of the approval for the Development Plan Review Permit, the Planning Commission Landscaping The applicant is requesting review and approval of the final exterior lighting plan landscaping for the building located at 257 North Canon Drive. The 3-story structure was approved by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2009 and the REPORT SUMMARY Commission reviewed and approved the project on Wednesday, April 15, Architectural and rooftop commercial Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing to discuss the project details and provide the applicant with an approval as conditioned. Project Agent: Hamid Gabbay Quality Act; no further environmental review is required at this time. Architectural Commission previously adopted a Categorical Exemption for landscaping for the building located at 257 North Canon Drive. The Request for approval of the final exterior lighting plan and rooftop The Bohbot (P ) the project on April 15, 2015 pursuant to the California Environmental 257 NORTH CANON DRIVE Meeting Date: Wednesday, June 20, N. Rexford Dnve Beverly Hills, CA TEL. (310) FAX. (310) Gabbay Conditions Conditions of Approval of Approval Architects Subject: City of Beverly Hilts Planning Division

2 The original project was approved by the Planning Commission in 2004 with a modified version URBAN DESIGN ALYSIS June 20, 2018 Type of Notice Required Period Actual Period Notice Date Date Newspaper Notice n/a n/a n/a n/a Agenda Posting 72 Hours 7 Days 6/17/2018 6/13/2018 Website 72 Hours 7 Days 6/17/2018 6/13/2018 Property Posting n/a n/a n/a n/a Mailed Notice n/a n/a n/a n/a Required Actual Notice PUBC OUTREACH AND NOTIFICATION Public outreach and notification was not required for this project. review is required at this time. April 15, 2015 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; no further environmental The Architectural Commission previously adopted a Categorical Exemption for the project on could result in a significant effect on the environment. Resources Code 2J000 façade of the building, front yard landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity 21178), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA The subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines in that the project includes the review of building design, colors and materials to the Public ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT appropriate. Applicants are encouraged and have the option of requesting a comprehensive review separate and apart from this application. Formal compliance review will occur when a building permit Applications for design review are preliminarily evaluated for compliance with the zoning code. application is filed (plan check). The applicant has been advised that changes during plan check may requite revisions and subsequent approval from the Architectural Commission or staff, as ZONING CODE COMPANCE proposed potted shrubbery on the roof deck shall be provided and plantings shall be included Commission. The exterior lighting for the structure focuses visual attention on the central twostory canopy above the courtyard area. Optional LED light settings are available and different colored lighting scenarios allow for options for further multi-colored effects. The Architectural coloration of all exterior lighting proposed. In addition, the container size and irrigation for the Commission will provide the applicant with specific requirements regarding the intensity and on the project to provide a landscaped area on the rooftop to screen the lunch area from other for the planter at the southern corner of the street-facing elevation at the roof deck, as indicated of the design approved in The Planning Commission had placed conditions of approval buildings views and to provide a final exterior lighting plan for review by the Architectural on the roof plan. 257 N Canon Drive (The Bohbot) Architectural Commission Report

3 V Architectural Commission Report 257 N Canon Drive (The Bohbot) June20, 2018 Attachment A Detailed Design Description and Materials (applicant prepared)

4 City of Beverly Hills Architectural Review Application Page 3 of 12 SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A Indicate Requested Application El / ZONING INFORMATION Staff Review Three (3) sets of plans required (all plan sets must be 11 x 17 in size). Architectural Commission Review Eight (8) sets of plans required (all plan sets must be 11 x 17 in size). Public Notice materials required for Sign Accommodations (see Section 5 for public notice requirements). B C Identify the scope Describe of work (check all New construction Façade Remodel ONLY Business Identification Sign(s) Number of signs proposed: Building Identification Sign(s) Numberofsignsproposed: that I apply): El Remodel: mt. & Ext, no floor area added Remodel: mt. & Ext, floor area added Awning(s): New Recovery fl Open Air Dining: #Tables # Chairs Sign Accommodation (explain reason for the accommodation request below): Numberofsignsproposed: Other: BUILDING GHTING AND SYNTHETIC TURF the scope of work proposed including materials and finishes: In an effort to enhance the overall aesthetic of the building for the benefit of the tenants and visitors, elegant LED lighting was installed. Sconces were installed on the ground floor in the open breezeway to illuminate the path. LED Wall Washers were installed underneath the skylight to accentuate the prominent architectural feature. Additionally, we are requesting the synthetic turf be eliminated from the high roof of the building. Installing green synthetic turf will in fact look out of place and will not be consistent with surrounding roof typologies and aesthetics. Moreover, installing synthetic turf will affect the owner s ability to receive a complete roof warranty because it will be altered by adding synthetic turf. D Identify the Project Zoning (City Zoning Map: R-4 R-3 C-5 Other: R-4X RMCP C-3T-1 ] R-4 R-4-P C-3 C-3A C-3T-2 C-3T-5 R-4X2 C-3B C-5 E Lot is E1 General Office Building Retail Building Medical Office Building currently developed with (check all apply): Multi-family Building Vacant Restaurant that Other (specify below): F Has the existing resource inventory, Planning Division if structure been designed including the the property notable architect by a or is it on historic City of Beverly Historic Resources Survey (Verify with the is on City s listed the Yes No If yes, please list Architect s name: survey)? identified any

5 A Indicate in the chart below all applicable signage details: 1 2 Type of Sign Quantity Dimensions Square Ft Maximum Area Permitted by code SECTION 3 PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continues on next page) Material: OUTDOOR DINING ELEMENTS (List all material for all outdoor dining elements.) Material: Color! Transparency: Material: Material: Material: WINDOWS/DOORS (Include frame, trim, glass, metal, etc.) Color! Transparency: Material: flist N/A, not applicable, for features that do not apply.): 4 Page 4 of 12 City of Beverly Hills Architectural 3 5 B List the specific materials and finishes for all of the architectural features proposed in the project FACADE (List all material for all portions visible from the street) ROOF COLUMNS BALCONIES & RAINGS Review Application

6 Architectural City of Beverly Hills Page 5 of 12 Review Application SECTION 3 PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS AWNINGS, CANOPIES Material: (continued from previous page) DOWNSPOUTS Material: / GUTTERS BUSINESS ID SIGN(S) Material: BUILDING ID SIGN(S) Material: EXTERIOR GHTING Material: LED- WALL SCONCES AND WALL WASHERS PAVED SURFACES Material: FREESTANDING WALLS AND FENCES Material: OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS Material: C Describe the proposed landscape theme, complements the proposed style of if architecture: applicable. Explain how the proposed landscaping

7 A Clearly identify how your project adheres to each of the required findings of the Architectural 1 Describe how the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste and good spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas and high quality. design and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty, Review Commission: SECTION 4 DESIGN ALYSIS AND FINDINGS (for Commission level applications only) structures are involved. code and other applicable laws insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and 5. Describe how the proposed development is in conformity with the standards of the municipal precise plans adopted pursuant to the general plan. developments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and with any Describe how the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed Page 6 of 12 City of Beverly Hills Architectural 4. depreciate in appearance and value. of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially 3. Describe how the proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance, may tend to make the environment less desirable. reasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors which 2. Describe how the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the structure is Review Application

8 VI I Architectural Commission Report 257 N Canon Drive (The Bohbot) June2O,2018 Attachment B Project Design Plans

9 LEGEND: DEX O TEX COLORS AREA DRAIN RI GLERFLOA NEDIUR UREA C REEENNED AALL LAMIRED GHT GRET AREA UP REFDGR (3A N ) ILLUMITED EMIT SUN A/ RMERGEIIG) DA1RED D F DRINRING FAUNTAIN DEPRESSED SLAA 3 FIGINDMNIAMMWPLAN1ONIW A.I WALL TTRED 1D A EDNERETE 3 HR RATED (DEE DET AGE/TI RET. FRAMED 1 HR RATED INTERIOR IDA FILE WISP laid I (SEE BET AGE/IT RET. FRAMED INR RATED EDTEMTDR (DEE DET HAl/IA) MET. FRAMED NONE RATED (DEE DET AA,l/IS) PLTMRISG FIAORRES EALES PER TABLE 4 1 DINING AREA 3.DTS S.F 3D SF FER TLCUPANT=3.5TD/ TB =119 /2=6D FOR EAER SEX ETA DRODR A MALE 2AC T URIL ills FEMALE 2AT ELAT a FAR AATERPRDTFIND DEE RATERPAGAFIAG CANDULTANT DRAR1IIGS 1 ØD SCALE ROOF LLVEL PLAN 1/B = 1 0 COVERED MECH AREA 2,000 S.F. /l I AAE1 AILU FLOOR AREA S.F. sl) ROOF LETEL BUILDING AREA (C.B.C) S.F. / LANDUCAPE PLAN THE BOHBDT 257 N CANON DR BEVERLY HILLS Lt: CA 90210

10 z GD H -o 0 HC m 0) NJ 0i z 0 z 0 z C m GABBAY

11 k) 01 z 0 > z 0 z C m Li GABBAY

12 1 GABBAY ARCHITECTS o El

13 R u.. LZ z E -t II n 0 z p 4- I, >11 GABBAY L I

14 Attachment C DRAFT Approval Resolution Architectural Commission Report 257 N Canon Drive (The Bohbot) June 20, 2018

15 RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY Of BEVERLY HILLS CONDITIOLLY APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PERMIT OF THE FIL in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Public Page 1 of 6 AC XX-18 Resource Code Sections 21000, et Section 4. The subject project has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions set forth project. resolution documents the official action of the Architectural Coiiimission with respect to the Section 3. Consistent with Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section , this districts, subject to findings set forth in Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section deny design-related aspects of projects located in the city s commercial and multi-family authorizes the Architectural Commission the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or Section 2. Beverly Hills Municipal Code ArticLe 30, Chapter 3 of Title 10, Canon Drive The Bohbot). the final exterior lighting plan and rooftop landscaping for the property located at 257 North owner, Canon Luxury Building, LLC (the Applicant ), has applied for architectural approval of Section 1. Hamid Gabbay, Architect agent/architect, on behalf of the property determines as follows: The Architectural Commission of the City of Beverly Hills hereby finds, resolves and 257 NORTH CANON DRIVE (PL THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT EXTERIOR GHTING PLAN AND ROOFTOP BORBOT). RESOLUTION NO. AC XX- 18

16 seq.), and the city s local CEQA Guidelines. The subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Public Resources Code $), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the project incltides the review of Page2of6 ACXX-18 structure is reasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors B. The plan for the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the design principles to reinforce the city s urban form and promote the image of Beverly Hills. incorporates an appropriate balance of color, high qualify materials and appropriate architectural spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality. Specifically, the project and good design and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty, A. The plan for the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste findings: report(s), oral and written testimony, the Architectural Commission hereby makes the following Section 6. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff application. June $ at which time oral and documentary evidence was received concerning the Section 5. The Architectural Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on environment. there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on the minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. [t can be seen with certainty that building design, colors and materials to the façade of the building, front yard landscaping or secj.), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections et

17 constructed using contemporary building materials and practices, and, as conditioned, compliant with all applicable building codes, including standards that protect against unwanted noise and vibrations. Page3of6 ACXX-t$ those exterior elements of the building which the Planning Commission found contributed to the F. The proposed development is designed in a manner that protects and preserves regulations. involved. As conditioned, the project will be designed in compliance with all applicable other applicable laws insofar as the locationand appearance of the buildings and structures are E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and appropriate to other improvements in the general vicinity. manner that complies with local ordinances. The overall design is consistent with and the applicable goals and policies set forth in the general plan, and, as conditioned, designed in a with any precise plans adopted pursuant to the general plan. The proposed project complies with proposed developments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and D. As conditioned, the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the surrounding improvements and is well matched to the selected materials. quality and durability. Moreover, the project design is appropriate to the building and materials proposed for the project, which incorporates contemporary building material of known appearance and value. Specifically, the commission has reviewed the design and construction inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in C. Proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance, of which may tend to make the environment less desirable. The proposed project is proposed to be

18 2-707 of this title. The proposed project does not include a request and has not been determined under section Therefore, this finding is not applicable to the subject project. by the Planning Commission to be a project that qualifies as a character contributing building 1. Revised Plan Submittal. For all projects that are approved with project-specific conditions, a revised plan set that has fully incorporated all such conditions shall be submitted to the 2. Architectural Approval. Project approval is for the design-related aspects of the project 3. Compliance with Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant 4. Compliance with Special Conditions. Any special conditions that require approval by the Page4of6 ACXX-t8 Director of Community Development, or designee, shalt be submitted to the staff liaison to applicable conditions imposed by any discretionary review approval. shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable provisions of the city s municipal code and codes, which may require review and approval from other city commissions or officials. only. No approval is implied or granted with regard to applicable city zoning or technical building permit plan check process. project planner, both in hard copy format and in electronic format, prior to submitting for the Standard Conditions No Project-Specific Conditions request defined in this resolution subject to the following conditions: Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the Architectural Commission hereby grants the determination of the project as a character contributing building in accordance with section 10-

19 5. Project Rendering. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate review application, whichever is greater. PageS of6 ACXX-18 Development Department. certification to be entered in the administrative record maintained by the Community passage, approval, and adoption of this resolution, and shall cause this resolution and its Section 8. The Secretary of the Architectural Commission shall certify to the from the date of approval, unless extended pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 8. Validity of Permits. The rights granted by this approval shall remain valid for three (3) years Architectural Commission. charges. A substantial modification to the approved project requires approval from the with the commission s action. This determination shall be subject to applicable fees and or designee, shall determine if changes to the approved project are in substantial compliance 7. Substantial Compliance with Approved Plans. The Director of Community Development, cover sheet(s) of the building permit set of plans. 6. Approval Resolution. A copy of the signed resolution of approval shall be scanned onto the evaluate project compliance during construction. Community Development, or designee, and shall include sufficient design information to quality and detail of the rendering shall be subject to approval from the Director of into the building permit set of plans, an updated color rendering of all building facades. The the commission within fourteen (14) days of approval or prior to submittal of the plan check

20 Council within fourteen (14) days of the final action by filling a written appeal and paying appropriate fees with the City of Beverly Hills City Clerk. Page6of6 ACXX-18 Mark Odell, Urban Designer Michelle Kaye, Chair Community Development Department Architectural Commission Approved as to form and Content: Adopted: June 20, 201$ Section 9. Decisions of the Architectural Commission may be appealed to the City