SIXTH ANNUAL AIRPORT PROJECT DELIVERY SUMMIT

Transcription

1 SIXTH ANNUAL AIRPORT PROJECT DELIVERY SUMMIT Terminal 1 In Line Baggage Screening Project June 8th & 9th, 2011 San José, CA Marc Gambrill, P.E, Director of Capital Improvement Program Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport

2 Terminal 1 In-Line Baggage Screening Project Agenda FLL Background Overview Evolution of the different Project Delivery Options Utilized in this Project through the design and construction phase Why it is important for the owner to have an understanding of the different Airport Delivery methods especially for an in-line baggage screening project Success of the Project per the owner s perspective / Lessons Learned 3-D Model Presentation of the Terminal 1 In-Line Baggage Screening Project

3 FLL Background 57 air carrier gates at four terminals Three runways 9L-27R (9,000 ft. north runway) 9R-27L (5,276 ft. south runway) (6,905 ft. crosswind runway) 22 million passengers (2010) 256,000 aircraft operations (2010)

4 Chicago New York Madrid Orlando FLL Los Angeles Caracas Mexico City Panama Lima London Bogota Sao Paulo Buenos Aires

5 PBI 50 miles north FL Turnpike 3.5 miles west US 1 I-595 PE 1.5 miles I-95 Terminal 1 US 1 MIA 25 miles south

6 Overview Project Scope Terminal 1 Existing Baggage Screening Capabilities Terminal 1 New Baggage Screening Capabilities Changed from a Short-Term to a Long Term Solution Project History Overall Chronology

7 Overview Project Scope This project involves the installation of EDS equipment and ETD rooms on an elevated platform at the east and west end of Terminal 1 at the Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport. The Scope of Work includes but is not limited to installation of new baggage conveyor systems, renovation of existing baggage conveyor system, modification and upgrade of existing mechanical, electrical, and plumbing equipment, installation of hardware and software for use with an in-line application.

8 Overview Reason for the Project The current baggage make-up area in Terminal 1 of the Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport was no longer effective due to airline and passenger growth. Presently each of the four make-up carousels are utilized by both TSA and airline carriers, the EDS and ETD equipment is located next to the make-up devices to facilitate baggage screening causing a loosely organized, inefficient and overcrowded working environment.

9 Overview Project Scope Terminal 1 Existing Baggage Screening Capabilities 1600 bags/hour and manually inducted Terminal 1 New Baggage Screening Capabilities 4000 bags/hour and 100% automated

10 Overview Project Scope Changed from a Short-Term to a Long Term Solution Short-Term solution encroached into the tug drive area Limited operationally due to the ground surface area Constructability issue during the construction phase Evolved into an mezzanine system since there was sufficient cross sectional space

11 Overview Project History Overall Chronology of the Design and (QBS) 10/13/ NTP was issued for Solution-Program Verification Phase, this was to verify the schematic design for a interim in-line system can work. 12/12/06 Board appointed a Selection Committee (SC) to recommend the most qualified firm to provide Construction Risk (QBS) 1/11/ NTP was issued for 100% construction documents for interim in-line baggage system. 3/1/ Shortlist meeting for CM@Risk for T1 Interim solution, only 1 firm submitted. 5/8/ Shortlist meeting for CM@Risk for T1 Interim solution, 3 firms submitted.

12 Overview Project History Overall Chronology of Design and 12/13/2007 Presentations were held. 1/2/ NTP for 75% Design issued for full in-line baggage system. 1/16/ Negotiations with CM@Risk Contract #1 started on 1/16/2008 and ended on 7/16/2008 with Contractor #3, the firms did not accept Broward County s unlimited consequential damages. 2/2/ NTP for 100% Design construction documents.

13 Overview Project History Overall Chronology of Design and 3/10/2009 Board approval for Addendum to the Terminal Building Lease Agreement for Southwest manage the construction and installation of an in-line baggage system in Terminal 1. 3/23/2009 1st NTP for Southwest to start the procuring of construction, coordination of design, permitting, buying the price for the GC and conveyor system. 2/19/2010 2nd NTP for construction. 11/19/2011 Contract completion date (Actual completion date will be July 2011 ahead of schedule).

14 Overview Project Schedule and Budget Initial Project Budget was $75M Interim Solution ($15M) Long Term Solution ($60M) Final Construction Cost is $35M including soft cost Partially Funded by TSA Obtained $18M grant from TSA

15 Evolution of the different Project Delivery Options Utilized in this Project through the design and construction phase a. BCAD s Project Delivery Options CM@ Risk Design/Bid/Build Design/Build CM@ Risk Modified Job Order Contract Qualified Vendors List

16 Broward County Aviation Department s Options SELECTION TYPES Low Bid Best Value: Total Cost 3. Best Value: Fees 4. Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) 1 combined contract DesignerContractorOwner 1 Multi-Party contract Design-Bid-Build Low Bid Design/Build Low Bid Not Typical DesignBid-Build Best Value: Total Cost Design/Build Best Value: Total Cost Not Typical Fees, General Conditio ns, Etc. CM at-risk Best Value: Fees Design/Build Best Value: Fees IPD Best Value: Fees None CM at-risk QBS Design-Build QBS IPD QBS Price Definition Total Construction Cost (TCC) Total Construction Cost (TCC) Designer & Contractor 2 separate contracts DesignBuilder

17 Evolution of the different Project Delivery Options Utilized in this Project through the design and construction phase b. Project Initially Started as a CM@Risk i. CM@ Risk was the first option to deliver this project Procurement Timeline Delayed due to County Small Business Issues Re-advertised due to one vendor submitting on the project All of the shortlisted CM@Risk Contractors did not accept the contract language Contract Language Issues Uncapped consequential damages Baggage System contractors had issues with the language

18 Evolution of the different Project Delivery Options Utilized in this Project through the design and construction phase b. Project Initially Started as a CM@Risk Delay of the CM@ Risk procurement lost the benefit for this project delivery method since the design was moving forward and at 90%.

19 Evolution of the different Project Delivery Options Utilized in this Project through the design and construction phase C. Design/Bid/Build Developed 100% construction drawings to obtain bids Changed engineer of record in the construction phase Transferred the project to airlines to build project Waived the uncapped consequential damage language to capped at project construction cost Components of the project was being designed while in construction

20 Why it is important for the owner to have an understanding of the different Airport Delivery methods especially for an in-line baggage screening project A. Selecting a Delivery Method Understand Project Goals Understand Project Risks Understand your Capacity and Limitations Understand the Political Environment

21 Why it is important for the owner to have an understanding of the different Airport Delivery methods especially for an in-line baggage screening project B. Evaluation Process Know your Options Assess your Advantages, Disadvantages, Risk Peer Review Know the Industry Adaptive Approach Know your options

22 Success of the Project per owner s perspective / Lessons Learned Owner needs to be involved with the project from inception and development phase. In-Line Baggage Screening projects need to be procured as a Design/Build Owner needs to have an understanding of the PGDS requirements Owner needs to understand the TSA grant and testing process of in-line baggage screening projects Owner needs to learn more about the baggage screening industry and technologies (South Florida environment the equipment, UPS/6600 exposed to the humidity). Owner needs a better understanding of the O/M cost and staffing after commissioning of the in-line system.

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 D Model Presentation of the Terminal 1 In Line Baggage Screening Project Video of the Terminal 1 In-Line Screening Baggage Project

29 Thank You! Contact:Marc Gambrill, P.E. Director of Capital Improvement Program Broward County Aviation Department