RESOLUTION NO. File Nos. C14-061, SP15-004, HP15-001

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "RESOLUTION NO. File Nos. C14-061, SP15-004, HP15-001"

Transcription

1 RD:VMT:JMD 08/02/2016 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE ADOPTING THE OUR LADY LA VANG CHURCH AND MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING PROJECT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, FOR WHICH AN INITIAL STUDY WAS PREPARED, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AS AMENDED, AND ADOPTING A RELATED MITIGATION File Nos. C14-061, SP15-004, WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the Planning Director of the City of San José prepared an Initial Study and approved circulation a Mitigated Negative Declaration Our Lady La Vang Church and under Planning File Nos. C14-061, SP15-004, and (the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ), all in accordance with the requirements of the Calinia Quality Act of 1970, together with state and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively CEQA ); and WHEREAS, the Our Lady La Vang Church and (the ) analyzed under the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration consists of a rezoning from the R-M Multiple Residence and CG Commercial General Zoning Districts to PQP Public/Quasi-Public Zoning District to allow the demolition of the existing fire-damaged church building, the associated administrative building, a garage, a shed and a portion of the surface parking lot, and to allow the construction of a new approximately 20,000 square foot church building, a 15,000 square foot multi-purpose building, and a two-level parking garage on an approximately 2.8 gross acre site located at 389 East Santa Clara Street, San José, Calinia; and 1 T / doc Council Agenda: Item No.: 11.1(c)(1) DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov final document.

2 RD:VMT:JMD 08/02/2016 WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that implementation of the could result in certain significant effects on the environment and identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, in connection with the approval of a project involving the preparation of an initial study/mitigated negative declaration that identifies one or more significant environmental effects, CEQA requires the decision-making body of the lead agency to incorporate feasible mitigation measures that would reduce those significant environmental effects to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, whenever a lead agency approves a project requiring the implementation of measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, CEQA also requires a lead agency to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation, and such a mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared the consideration by the decision-maker of the City of San José as lead agency the (the Mitigation and Reporting Program ); and WHEREAS, the City of San José is the lead agency on the, and the City Council is the decision-making body the proposed approval to undertake the ; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation and Reporting Program the and intends to take actions on the in compliance with CEQA and state and local guidelines implementing CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation and Reporting Program the are on file in the Office of the Director 2 T / doc Council Agenda: Item No.: 11.1(c)(1) DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov final document.

3 RD:VMT:JMD 08/02/2016 of Planning, located at 200 East Santa Clara Street, 3rd Floor Tower, San José, Calinia, 95113, are available inspection by any interested person at that location and are, by this reference, incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set th herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE: THAT THE CITY COUNCIL does hereby make the following findings: (1) it has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and other inmation in the record and has considered the inmation contained therein, prior to acting upon or approving the, (2) the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared the has been completed in compliance with CEQA and is consistent with state and local guidelines implementing CEQA, and (3) the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgment and analysis of the City of San José, as lead agency the. The City Council designates the Director of Planning at the Director s Office at 200 East Santa Clara Street, 3rd Floor Tower, San José, Calinia, 95113, as the custodian of documents and records of proceedings on which this decision is based. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL does hereby find that based upon the entire record of proceedings bee it and all inmation received that there is no substantial evidence that the will have a significant effect on the environment and does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation and Reporting Program prepared the (Planning File No C14-061, SP15-004, and HP15-001). The Mitigation and Reporting Program the is attached hereto as Exhibit A and fully incorporated herein. The Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Reporting Program are: (1) on file in the Office of the Director of Planning, located at 200 East Santa Clara Street, 3rd Floor 3 T / doc Council Agenda: Item No.: 11.1(c)(1) DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov final document.

4 RD:VMT:JMD 08/02/2016 Tower, San José, Calinia, and (2) available inspection by any interested person. ADOPTED this day of, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: ATTEST: SAM LICCARDO Mayor TONI J. TABER, CMC City Clerk 4 T / doc Council Agenda: Item No.: 11.1(c)(1) DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov final document.

5 MITIGATION (File No. C14-061, SP15-004, ) CITY OF SAN JOSE June 2016

6 PREFACE Section of the Calinia Quality Act (CEQA) requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation or Reporting Program whenever it approves a project which measures have been required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring or reporting program is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration prepared the Our Lady of La Yang Church and concluded that the implementation of the project could result in significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval. This Mitigation and Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented. This document does not discuss those subjects which the Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the impacts from implementation of the project would be less than significant. I, FI<. (0 I H () Y JJ 14, the applicant, on the behalf of Olll{ LA D"I 0/= l.a IIAtJG', hereby agree to fully implement the Mitigation Measures, described below which have been developed in conjunction with the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration my proposed project. I understand that these mitigation measures or substantially similar measures will be adopted as conditions of approval with my development permit request to avoid or significantly reduce potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level, where feasible. This Mitigation and Reporting Program addresses those measures in terms of how and when they will be implemented. r I / Applicant's Signature _~~<-==,-+-_ A--"I_(_.. l_..-.4/:...0/'1"-,,....._.~ Date ~ /( ~/I r:;. ci<- _ -_~--,,-,-,-. :..:.. f=<..,,---,=~= ~".,.. ---~~!~~I~

7 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] AIR QUALITY Impact AIR-1: Emissions from diesel-operated construction equipment during project construction would result in significant child cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. MM AIR-1.1: The following construction equipment and measures shall be used and implemented to further reduce exhaust emissions during construction: All mobile diesel-powered off-road equipment larger than 50 horsepower and operating on the site more than two days continuously shall meet, at a minimum, U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards Tier 2 engines or equivalent. All diesel-powered portable equipment (i.e., aerial lifts, air compressors, and klifts) larger than 50 horsepower operating on the site more than two days continuously shall meet U.S. EPA particulate matter emissions standards Tier 4 engines or equivalent. Implement idling restrictions (e.g., maximum idling time of equipment is 5 minutes) to minimize the number of hours the equipment operates. Applicant Use of Tier 2 engines or equivalent on dieselpowered construction equipment. All measures shall be printed on all construction documents, contracts, and project plans. During construction. the Department of Planning, Building and Code Encement (PBCE) All measures shall be printed on all construction documents, contracts, and project plans. Measures shall be implemented during all construction activities. 0

8 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Impact BIO-1: If project demolition and tree removals occur during breeding season, the project could result in a significant impact to nesting raptors MM BIO-1.1. If possible, construction shall be scheduled between September and January (inclusive) to avoid the raptor nesting season. If this is not possible, pre-construction surveys nesting raptors shall be conducted by a qualified ornithologist to identify active raptor nests that may be disturbed during project implementation. Between February and April (inclusive) pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities or tree relocation or removal. Between May and August (inclusive), pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities. The surveying ornithologist shall inspect all trees in and immediately adjacent to the construction area raptor nests. MM BIO-1.2: If an active nest is found in an area or close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the ornithologist shall designate an adequate buffer zone to be established around the nest, in consultation with the Calinia Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The buffer would ensure that nests shall not be disturbed during project construction. Applicant Avoidance of construction activities during nesting seasons. If not possible, preconstruction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified ornithologist and construction-free buffer zones shall be designated around discovered nest. Submit a report indicating the results of the survey and any designated buffer zones to the Planner at the Department of Planning, Building and Code Encement (PBCE). Prior to the issuance of grading permit. A report indicating the results of the survey (and any other environmental investigation reports, if applicable) and any designated buffer zones. Prior to any demolition, construction activity, or issuance of grading permit. 1

9 MM BIO-1.3: The applicant shall submit a report to the City s Planner indicating the results of the survey and any designated buffer zones to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. CULTURAL RESOURCES [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Impact CUL-1: Construction of the proposed structures could significantly impact the historic school building due to damage from operation of construction equipment, staging, and material storage. MM CUL-1.1: The applicant shall prepare and implement a Historical Resources Protection Plan (HRPP). HRPP shall be completed by a qualified architectural historian. The HRPP. The HRPP shall be prepared by a qualified historic architect who meets the Secretary of Interior s Professional Qualifications Standards, and shall include measures to protect the St. Patrick School building from direct or indirect impacts during construction activities. The project applicant shall ensure that all contractors shall implement the HRPP during the demolition and construction phase. The project applicant shall submit monitoring updates to the City s Historical Preservation Officer upon request to ensure HRPP is being implemented. At a minimum, the plan shall include: Prior to demolition or grading permits. A final report of findings shall be submitted to the City Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) and a copy will be submitted to the The HRRP will be completed and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2

10 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Guidelines operation of construction equipment adjacent to historical resources; Guidelines storage of construction materials away from the historic resources; Requirements monitoring and documenting compliance with the plan; and Education/training of construction workers about the significance of the historical resources around which they would be working. A copy of the HRPP shall be submitted to the City of San José Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) review and approval prior to any ground disturbance activities. MM CUL-1.2: The applicant shall prepare preconstruction documentation and monitor disturbance of historic resources. Prior to construction, a qualified historic architect shall undertake an existing conditions study of the St. Patrick School building. The study shall include, but is not limited to, the following: The baseline condition of the building prior to construction An existing condition study prior to demolition and construction shall be completed by a qualified architectural historian and submitted to City Historic Preservation Officer. Prior to demolition and grading permits. City Historic Preservation Officer Existing condition study or documentation. Existing condition study or documentation shall be submitted prior to construction. 3

11 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Detailed written descriptions and visual illustrations, including physical characteristics of the resource which convey its historic significance and justifies its listing as a San José Landmark. The documentation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of San José s Historic Preservation Officer prior to any ground disturbance activities. MM CUL-1.3: During the demolition and construction phase, a qualified historic architect, as part of the monitoring team, shall make periodic site visits to monitor the condition of the property, including monitoring of any instruments such as crack gauges, if necessary. The monitoring period shall be a minimum of one site visit every month. The HPO may request an increase in the number of site visits at his/her discretion. The historic architect shall consult with a structural engineer if any problems with character-defining features are discovered. If, in the opinion of the historic architect, substantial adverse impacts related to construction activities are found during construction, the historic architect shall inm the project applicant or the applicant s designated representative responsible construction activities. If necessary, the project applicant shall implement the historic architect s recommendations corrective measures, including halting construction in situations Site visit reports and documentations shall be submitted to City Historic Preservation Officer during the demolition and construction phase. Prior to demolition and grading permits. City Historic Preservation Officer Quarterly monitoring reports of findings shall be submitted to the City Historic Preservation Officer. The historic resource monitoring shall be implemented during demolition and construction activities. Preconstruction historic resource documentation shall be submitted prior to construction. 4

12 where construction activities would imminently endanger historic resources. The historic architect/monitoring team shall prepare a report documenting the site visits. The reporting period shall be a minimum of once every three months. The site visit reports shall include a summary of the demolition and construction progress. If substantial adverse impacts related to the construction activities are identified during the site visits, the report shall also include, but is not limited to, the following: [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] The problem and potential impact to the adjacent historical resources during demolition and construction activities; The problem and potential impact to the adjacent historical resources during demolition and construction activities; Recommendations made by the historic architect to avoid the impact; Actions taken by the project applicant in response to the problem. The historic architect/monitoring team shall submit the site visit reports to the HPO no later than one week after each reporting period. 5

13 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] MM CUL-1.4: The project shall comply with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties and preserve the characterdefining features of historic properties upon completion of construction activities at the proposed project site. The qualified architectural historian or historic architect shall document (e.g., with photographs and other appropriate means) the level of success in meeting the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties and in preserving the character-defining features of the identified historic resources. The project applicant shall ensure that if repairs occur, in the event of damage to the St. Patrick School building during construction, repair work shall comply with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties and shall restore the character-defining features in a manner which does not affect the eligibility of the historic property as a City Landmark or the Calinia Register or the National Register. The final documentation of compliance to the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be submitted to Documentation of compliance to the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be completed by a qualified architectural historian or historic architect. Ensuring that repair work shall comply with Secretary of Interior s Standards Treatment of Historic Properties shall be during construction. Final documentati on of compliance shall be submitted prior to occupancy. City Historic Preservation Officer Documentation of compliance to the Secretary of the Interior s Standards the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be submitted to the City Historic Preservation Officer. to Treatment of Historic Properties Standards shall be submitted prior occupancy. 6

14 the San Jose s Historic Preservation Officer review and approval prior to occupancy. [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] GEOLOGY AND SOILS Impact GEO-1: Groundwater may be encountered during the construction phase. If groundwater is encountered during construction, dewatering activities could impact underlying sediments and result in ground settlements and damage to structures, hardscapes or utilities on-site. MM GEO-1.1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, soil borings shall be advanced and depth to groundwater levels shall be evaluated. A report of the investigation shall be submitted review and approval by the City s Geologist, and an approved copy of the investigation report shall be provided to the City s Planner. Subsurface investigations of the site shall be completed by a qualified geologist. Prior to issuance of grading permit. City s Geologist The final geotechnical investigation report shall be submitted to the City s Geologist. A copy will be submitted to the Geotechnical investigations and report shall be submitted prior to construction and issuance of grading permit 7

15 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] MM GEO-1.2: If dewatering is needed, the designlevel geotechnical investigations shall evaluate the underlying sediments and determine the potential settlements to occur on the site. The project applicant shall submit a report identifying the design-level geotechnical investigations review and approval to the satisfactory of the City s Geologist prior to the issuance of a grading permit. If it is determined that unacceptable settlements may occur, alternative groundwater control systems shall be required pursuant to consultation with the City s Geologist prior to the issuance of a grading permit. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Subsurface investigations of the site shall be completed by a qualified geologist. Prior to issuance of grading permit. City s Geologist The final geotechnical investigation report shall be submitted to the City s Geologist. A copy will be submitted to the. Geotechnical investigations and report shall be submitted prior to construction and issuance of grading permit Impact HAZ-1: Soil vapor intrusion from the site s surface into the occupied spaces of the proposed buildings could result in a significant impact to human health. MM HAZ-1.1: A vapor barrier beneath the proposed garage shall be installed prior to construction to reduce vapor migration. The vapor barrier design would be approved by the Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or equivalent regulatory agency, review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of cleanup activities. All measures shall be printed on all construction documents, contracts, and project plans Soil vapor barrier design documents shall be completed by a qualified hazardous materials specialist. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The final soil vapor barrier design documents shall be submitted to the Soil vapor design documents shall be submitted prior to issuance of grading permit. 8

16 prior to issuance of grading permits. A copy of the approved document the vapor barrier design, and any other applicable documentation, shall be provided to the Services Department and to the Director of Planning Building and Code Encement. [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] MM HAZ-1.2: The project shall include vapor barriers into the building design documents all utility penetrations at concrete joints and within the elevator and staircase areas. Impact HAZ-2: Construction workers could be exposed volatile organic compound (VOC)-impacted soil vapor and/or groundwater. MM HAZ-2.1: A Site Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant and implemented (as outlined below) by the project applicant, and any contaminated soils or materials found in concentrations above established thresholds shall be removed and disposed of according to Calinia Hazardous Waste Regulations. The SMP shall include, but not limited to, the following: Management practices handling contaminated soil or other materials if encountered during construction or cleanup activities and measures to minimize dust generation, stormwater runoff, and tracking of soil off-site. Site Management Plan shall be completed by a qualified hazardous materials specialist. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, shall review and approve the SMP. Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, shall review and approve the SMP. A copy of the final SMP shall The SMP shall be submitted and approved prior to construction and issuance of a grading permit. 9

17 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) environmental contaminants of concern to evaluate the site conditions following SMP implementation. Management of groundwater during construction. Characterization and profiling of the soil that shall require off-haul to accommodate the partial below grade parking garage. Screening of soil during construction using vapor monitoring equipment. Design of planned utility trenches in a manner that will help limit the lateral migration of VOC-impacted soil vapor and/or groundwater. Criteria installation of vapor mitigation measures to decrease the risk of vapor intrusion into the planned buildings. The approved SMP shall detail procedures and protocols management of soil containing environmental contaminants during site development activities. be submitted to the The SMP shall be prepared and submitted to the Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, review and approval prior to issuance of grading 10

18 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] permits and commencement of cleanup activities. All measures shall be printed on all construction documents, contracts, and project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. A copy of the approved SMP shall be provided to the Services Department and to the Director of Planning Building and Code Encement. MM HAZ-2.2: Completion of a Health and Safety Plan (HSP) is required prior to construction. The HSP shall be implemented under the direction of a Site Safety and Health Officer. The Health and Safety Plan shall include the following elements, as applicable, but not limited to: Provisions personal protection and monitoring exposure to construction workers. Procedures to be undertaken in the event that contamination is identified above action levels or previously unknown contamination is discovered. Procedures the safe storage, stockpiling, and disposal of contaminated soils. Provisions the on-site management and/or treatment of contaminated groundwater during extraction or dewatering activities. Emergency procedures and responsible personnel. of the HSP shall be completed by a Site Safety and Health Officer. Prior to issuance of a grading permit. Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, shall review and approve the HSP. Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, shall review and approve the SMP. A copy of the final SMP shall be submitted to the The SMP shall be submitted prior to construction and issuance of a grading permit. 11

19 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] The HSP shall be prepared and submitted to the Santa Clara County Department of Health (SCCDEH), or other appropriate regulatory agency, review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of cleanup activities. All measures shall be printed on all construction documents, contracts, and project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. A copy of the approved HSP shall be provided to the Services Department and to the Director of Planning Building and Code Encement. Impact HAZ-3: Abandonment of the on-site groundwater monitoring well could expose construction workers to elevated concentrations of VOC-impacted groundwater. MM HAZ-3.1: If abandonment of the well is required due to the construction of the proposed parking garage and multi-purpose building, the well shall be properly destroyed, with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), prior to development of the site. A well destruction permit shall be obtained from the SCVWD and the well decommissioned prior to issuance of grading permits, encroachment permits, or other ground disturbing activities (i.e., off-site or onsite improvements), whichever occurs first. Relocation of monitoring wells shall be approved by the State Water Resources Control Board. A copy of the approved well destruction permit shall be provided to the Services Department and to the If well abandonment is required, the project applicant shall obtain a well destruction permit issued by SCVWD. If applicable, permit from SCVWD shall be obtained bee construction. Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) If applicable, a well destruction permit shall be obtained from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). A copy of the well destruction permit shall be submitted to the The well destruction permit shall be obtained prior to the City s issuance of a grading permit. 12

20 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Director of Planning, Building, and Code Encement prior to issuance of grading permits, encroachment permits, or any other ground disturbing activities. Impact HAZ-4: The existing structures on the site may have been constructed with asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint, which could be released upon demolition. MM HAZ-4.1: In accordance with National Emissions Standards Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines, an asbestos survey shall be permed on all structures proposed demolition that are known or suspected to have been constructed prior to If asbestos-containing materials are determined to be present, the materials shall be abated by a certified asbestos abatement contractor in accordance with the regulations and notification requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). Demolition and disposal of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) will be completed in accordance with the procedures specified by BAAQMD s Regulation 11, Rule 2. A copy of the asbestos survey shall be provided to the Services Department and to the Director of Planning, Building and Code Encement review and approval. If asbestos is discovered during survey, asbestos shall be abated by a certified asbestos abatement contractor. Prior to the demolition and grading permits. BAAQMD A copy of the asbestos survey shall be submitted to the The asbestos survey shall be submitted prior to construction. 13

21 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] MM HAZ-4.2: A lead-based paint survey shall be permed on all structures proposed demolition that are known or suspected to have been constructed prior to If lead-based paint is identified, then federal and state construction worker health and safety regulations shall be followed during renovation or demolition activities. If loose or peeling lead-based paint is identified at the building, it shall be removed by a qualified lead abatement contractor and disposed of in accordance with existing state and federal hazardous waste regulations. Requirements set th in the Calinia Code of Regulations will be followed during demolition activities, including employee training, employee air monitoring, and dust control. Any debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings will be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria the waste being disposed. A copy of the lead-based paint survey shall be provided to the Services Department and the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Encement review and approval. NOISE If lead-based paint is discovered during survey, the paint shall be removed by a qualified lead abatement contractor. Prior to the demolition and grading permits. A copy of the lead-based paint survey shall be submitted to the The lead-based paint survey shall be submitted prior to demolition and construction. Impact NOI-1: Mechanical equipment associated with the project could generate noise in excess of the City s Municipal Code noise standard of 55 dba DNL at residential property lines. 14

22 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] MM NOI-1.1: A detailed acoustical study shall be prepared during final project design to evaluate the potential noise generated by building mechanical equipment and demonstrate the necessary noise control that the project applicant shall install to meet the City s 55 dba DNL goal. The study shall be submitted to the City s Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits. A detailed acoustical study shall be completed by a qualified acoustical consultant during final design. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. A detailed acoustical study shall be submitted to the The acoustical study shall be submitted during the final design of the project (prior to a building permit). Impact NOI-2: Residences in the vicinity of the site and the St. Patrick School would be intermittently exposed to high noise levels during project construction. MM NOI-2.1: Develop and implement a construction noise logistics plan during all phases of construction on the project site. The construction noise logistics plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following: Construct solid plywood fences around construction sites adjacent to operational businesses, residences, or noise-sensitive land uses. Utilize quiet models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with mufflers, which are in good condition and appropriate the equipment. All construction noise measures shall be printed on all approved construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans. All measures shall be printed on construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans prior to the issuance of grading permit, and implementati on shall be during construction. Final construction noise measures on plans shall be submitted the Final construction noise measures shall submitted to the City prior to construction. These measures will be implemented during construction with oversight by the applicant. 15

23 [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Locate all stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generators, as far away as possible from adjoining noise-sensitive land uses. Prohibit all unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. Notify all adjacent businesses, residences, and noise-sensitive land uses of the construction schedule in writing. Designate a disturbance coordinator who would be responsible responding to complaints about construction noise. The name and telephone number of the disturbance coordinator shall be posted at the construction site and included in the notice sent to neighboring noise-sensitive land uses regarding the construction schedule. Provide written schedule to adjacent land uses and nearby residences of major noisy construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure coordination with adjacent residential uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize noise disruption. 16

24 All measures shall be printed on all approved construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans. The applicant shall submit a copy of all approved plans prior to construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans to the City s Planner prior to the issuance of a grading permit. [Applicant/Proponent ] [Lead Agency ] Impact NOI-3.1: The project would result in construction-related groundborne vibration impacts at the closest residences. MM NOI-3.1: Prohibit the use of heavy vibrationgenerating construction equipment, such as vibratory rollers or clam shovel drops, within 25 feet of any adjacent residential building and the St. Patrick School. All measures shall be printed on all approved construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans. All construction vibration measures shall be printed by the applicant on all approved construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans. All measures shall be printed on construction documents, contracts, and/or project plans prior to the issuance of grading permit, and implementati on shall be during construction. Final construction vibration measures on plans shall be submitted the Final construction noise measures shall submitted to the City prior to construction. These measures will be implemented during construction with oversight by the applicant. 17

25 18