Transcription

1 * *

2 ANSYS ABAQUS ANSYS

3 Stress (Mpa) ABAQUS Stress (Mpa) Strain ASTM A36 C3D8I ASTM A325 C3D8I

4 Mpl (Kn.m) Mnp (Kn.m) Ft (MPa) d bolt (mm) bp (mm) tp (mm) Fyp (MPa)

5 Max. plastic strain Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) Max. plastic strain Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) von-mises stress(n/m2) 8.E+8 7.E+8 6.E+8 5.E+8 4.E+8 3.E+8 2.E+8 1.E+8.E von-mises stress (N/m2) 8.E+8 7.E+8 6.E+8 5.E+8 4.E+8 3.E+8 2.E+8 1.E+8 Moment ratio (M/2kn.m).E Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) Rig. node Up.. node left node Bot. node Mid. node Upp. node left node Bot. node Rig. node Mid. node ( )

6 End plate height (mm) up) End plate separation (mm) Mu (Kn.m) End plate height (mm) End plate separation (mm) Bending Moment (kn.m) Rotation (rad.)

7 Stress ratio (P/FF y - beam) Moment ratio (Mu/Mu-no axial force) P= (MPa) Stress ratio (P/F y - beam) Moment ratio(mu/mu-no axial force) (P) (F y-beam) (M=)

8 von-mises stress (N/m 2 ) 8.E+8 7.E+8 6.E+8 5.E+8 4.E+8 3.E+8 2.E+8 1.E+8.E Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) -1sf -15sf -2sf -25sf -4sf +1s +3s +4s +5s sf s Max. plastic strain Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) -1sf -15sf -25sf -3sf -4sf +1s +2s +3s +37s Max. plastic strain Moment ratio (M/2kn.m) ct16-1sf -15sf -2sf -3sf -4sf +1s +2s +3s +4s +5s von-mises stress (N/m 2 ) 8.E+8 7.E+8 6.E+8 5.E+8 4.E+8 3.E+8 2.E+8 1.E+8.E Moment ratio (M/2 kn.m) -1sf -15sf -2sf -4sf +2s +3s +37s

9 End plate height (mm) End plate separation (mm) -15sf -2sf -25sf -3sf -4sf +3s +4s +5s Rotation (rad.) -1sf -15sf -2sf -25sf -3sf -4sf +1s +2s +3s +37s End plate height (mm) sf -2sf -25sf -3sf -4sf +2s +3s +37s End plate separation (mm)

10 Kn.m/rad -3sf -25sf -2sf -15sf -1sf +37s +3s +2s +1s -4sf Kn.m/rad t1b6-3sf -25sf -2sf -15sf -1sf +5s +4s +3s +2s +1s -4sf Rotation (rad.) +1s +2s +3s +4s +5s -1sf -15sf -2sf -25sf -3sf -4sf

11 1 - Krishnamurthy, N. and Graddy, D. E. (1976). Correlation between 2- and 3-dimensional finite element analysis of steel bolted end-plate connections. Computers and Structures, Vol. 6, PP Ahuja, V, Kukreti, A. R. and Murray, T. M. (1982). Analysis of stiffened end-plate connections using the finite element method. Research report No. FSEL/MBMA 82-1, Fears Structural Engineering Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. 3 - Ghassemieh, M., Kukreti, A. R. and Murray, T. M. (1983). Inelastic finite element analysis of stiffened endplate moment connections. Research report No. FSEL/MBMA 83-2, Fears Structural Engineering Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. 4 - Bahaari, M. R. and Sherbourne, A. N. (1994). Computer modeling of an extended end-plate bolted connection. Computer and Structures, Vol. 52, PP Bose, B., Wang, Z. M. and Sarkar, S. (1997). Finite element analysis of unstiffened flush end-plate bolted joints. ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 123, PP Mays, T.W., (2). Application of the finite element method to the seismic design and analysis of large moment end-plate connections, Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 7 - Ghassemieh, M. and Jalalpour, M. (27). Seismic behavior of steel extended end-plate moment connections. Journal of University College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Vol. 41, No. 1, PP

12 8 - Maggi, Y.I., Goncalves, R. M., Leon, R. T. and Ribeiro, L.F. L., (24). Parametric analysis of steel bolted end plate connections using finite element modeling. Journal of Construction Steel Research, Vol. 61, PP Prying Force 2 - Moment Ratio