Technical Specifications, M.O.C., Parameters, Size Range, Applications & Constructive Points For Thermal FR Composite Pipes and Fittings

Transcription

1 Technical Specifications, M.O.C., Parameters, Size Range, Applications & Constructive Points For Thermal FR Composite Pipes and Fittings Product Name Technical Details (MOC) Technical Parameters Temperature Resistance U.V. Resistance Pressure withstand Capacity & Size Avaiblity Standard Jointing System Special specimen of Product Anjney Brand Thermal FR Composite (Inbuilt Glass Fiber Reinforcement Layer) Pipes & Fittings POLYPROPLYNE IMPACT CO POLYMER (BODYCOTE APPROVED) HAVING INBUILT FIBER REINFORCEMENT LAYER Upper & Inner Layer Poly Propylene Impact Copolymer Middle Layer Glass Fiber Reinforcement Thermal Conductivity Btu/hr ft F Vicat Softening Point 145 Deg C Melting Temperature Rang Deg. Tensile Strenth at Break 40 MPa Flexural Modulus 1260 MPa Coefficient of Linear Expansion 1.0X Deg. To 110 Deg Temperature resistance 4 Deg to 100 Deg Working Temperaturpe Resistance Have Specialized U.V. Treated pipe With Carbon Compounded U.V. Layer on Upper side For Outdoor Application Areas. Having in 4 options: 1. SDR5 PN25 : 20mm to 160 mm OD 2. SDR6 PN20 : 20mm to 160 mm OD 3. SDR7.4 PN16 : 20mm to 160 mm OD 4. SDR11 PN10 : 50 mm to 160 mm OD Pipe: DIN Fittings: DIN16962 Part 5 to Part 10 Socket Fusion Welding Lowest Thermal Conductivity i.e Btu/hr ft F., Giving Least Heat Loss, So require Very Less Insulation, almost 5 time lesser compare to any of Metal Piping Bare Minimum RA Value 0.1 Micron, Giving Least Friction Loss Latest Socket Fusion Welding Technology. Giving 100% Leak Proof Joints till Life of Pipe.

2 Applications Areas: Replacement Again Constructive Points of Anjney Pipe Wall Thickness Chart DIN 8077/78 standard Technical Comparison Commercial Comparison Guarantee / Life Encl annexure 4 Expectancy Clamping chart details Encl annexure 5 Photographs in Different Encl. Annexure 6 Applications Customer List Encl. Annexure 7 1. Cooling Tower & Chilling Plant Piping 2. Highly Corrosive Chemical Piping 3. Soft Water / Raw Water / RO Water, 4. ETP Plant / STP Plant / WTP Plant, 5. Brine Line, 6. Hot & Cool Oil Line 7. Condensate Lines 8. Pickling Plant 9. All type of Utility & Process Line GI, MS,ERW, SS, Aluminum, CS, Composite, PPR Plumbing Pipes, PVC/UPVC/CPVC, PP FRP, PVC FRP Pipes, HDPE Pipes Very Less Heat Loss due to lesser thermal conductivity As a result of Socket Fusion joint, 0 % leakage Lesser Sagging because of very less thermal expansion Since having 0.1 Micron RA value and mirror finish inner surface, 40 % to 60 % lesser friction loss compared to other pipes High temperature and high pressure with stand capacity due to Inbuilt FR Reinforcement Layer Due to Lesser Thermal Conductivity, Negligible heat loss Annexure 1 Encl. Annexure 2 Technical Comparison chart of Thermal FR Composite Pipes with other pipes Encl. Annexure 3 Commercial Comparison chart of Thermal FR Composite Pipes with other pipes

3 Annexure:1. COMPOSITE PIPE WALL THICKNESS CHART WITH DIMENSIONS OF OD AND ID (In mm) Nominal diameter Approx. Wall Thickness (Minimum and Maximum) Total Wall thickness Inner Diameter (ID) SDR 11 SDR 7.4 SDR 6 PN 10 PN 16 PN 20 DN (OD) MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX SDR 11 SDR 7.4 SDR 6 SDR 11 SDR 7.4 SDR 6 PN 10 PN 16 PN 20 PN 10 PN 16 PN

4 Annexure 2 Technical Comparison of Anjney brand Thermal FR Composite Pipes and other pipes PROPERTIES PP FRP PIPE HDPE PIPES METAL PIPES JOINTING METHOD JONTING STRENGTH SUPPORT ADDITIONAL WORK CHEMICAL RESISTANCE INNER SURFACE BUT WELDING WITH FRP COATING WHICH IS TECHNICALY NOT AT ALL FEASIBLE VERY POOR DUE TO FRP COATING REQUIRED SUPPORT REQUIRED AT EVERY 1 METER FRP WORK IS ADDITIONAL FAIR ROUGH BUTT FUSION WELDING SUSTEMS POOR DUE TO BUTT FUSION WELDINGSYSTEM 3 TIMES HIGHER REQUIRED COMPARED TO ALMOST DOUBLE SUPPORT REQUIRED IN ORDER TO AVOID SAGGING M.S SUPPORT IS ADITIONAL FOR CONTINUOUS SUPPORT GOOD ROUGH COMPARED TO THREADED JOINTS VERY POOR DUE TO THREADED JOINTS REQUIRED TO PREVENT HEAT LOSS AND SWEATING SUPPORT NOT REQUIRED ASSITIONAL WORK FOR VERY POOR DUE TO CORROSION VERY ROUGH INNER SURFACE WHICH LEADS TO FRICTION LOSS SOCKET FUSION WELDING, TECHNICALY PROVEN ASPER DIN EXCELLENT DUE TO SOCKET FUSION WELDING SYSTEM NOT REQUIRED SUPPORT REQUIRED AT EVERY 2 3 METERS NO ADITIONAL WORK EXCELENT EXCELENT DUE TO MIRROR FINISH RA Value 6.5 MM/UM 8.0 MM/UM APPROX 2.0 MM/UM 0.1 MM/UM DUE TO VERY LOW DUE TO FRICTION LOSS ROUGH INNER SURFACE & MIRROR FINISH INNER BUTT WELDING RING SURFACE

5 ENERGY SAVING LIFE EXPECTANCY ADDITIONAL COSTING STANDARDS TEMPRATURE RESISTANCE PIPING VIEW MAINTENANCE COSTING PAY BACK PERIOD HEAT LOSS MORE ENERGY CONSUMPTION DUE TO HIGHER FRICTION LOSS WHICH LEADS TO MORE EXPENSES 2 TO 5 YEARS LIFE WITH MAINTANCE FRP COATING COASTING NO ENGINEERING STANDARDS MAXIMUM 80 C TEMPRATURE DISORDERING AND MESSY VIEW DUE TO FRP COATING NO PAY BACK BECAUSE OF MAINTANCE DUE TO THERMAL HEAT LOSS MORE ENERGY CONSUMPTION DUE TO HEAT LOSS AND FRICTION LOSS 5 TO 7 YEARS LIFE MAINTENANCE DUE TO LEAKAGES AND M.S SUPPORT AND REQUIRED ENERGY CONSUMPTION DUE TO HEAT LOSS AND FRICTION LOSS MAXIMUM 5 YEARS OF LIFE WITH MAINTENANCE ADDITIONAL COSTING OF ENERGY SAVING PP FRP PIPES WHICH GIVES PAYBACK IN A SHORT PERIOD ABOVE 25 YEARS OF LIFE WITHOUT MAINTANCE AND WITH ESTHETIC VIEW AS PER IS 4984 / 1995 IS 1293 AS PER DIN UPTO 60 C TEMPERATURE UNTIDY VIEW DUE TO SAGGING HIGH MAINTENANCE DUE TO SAGGING AND LEAKAGES NO PAY BACK 6 TO 7 TIMES HIGHER UPTO 100 C TEMPERATURE NICE VIEW DUE TO NO SAGGING MAINTENANCE DUE TO LEAKAGES AND HIGH NO PAY BACK 900 TIMES HIGHER HEAT LOSS NIL UPTO 110 C TEMPERATURE NICE AND ESTHETIC VIEW WITHOUT SAGGING NIL COMPETITIVE PAY BACK WITH IN 1 YEAR VERY LESS

6 Annexure: 3.COMMERCIAL COMPARISSION BETWEEN ALL METAL PIPING Pipe Product 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" G.I. C Class ISI C.S. Schedule MS ERW High S.S. 304 Schedule PP + FRP COMPOSITE PIPING Conclusion of Compression chart 1. G.I-C Class ISI: - 5% to 70% Higher So Average 15% price higher compare to COMPOSITE PIPING. 2. C.S. Schedule 40:- 45% to 100% Higher So Average 65% price higher compare to COMPOSITE PIPING. 3. M.S.ERW:- 10% to 60% Higher So Average 10% price higher compare to COMPOSITE PIPING. 4. S.S.304:- 300% to 400% Higher So Average 333% price higher compare to COMPOSITE PIPING. 5. PP+FRP:- 20% to 120% Higher So Average 45% price higher compare to COMPOSITE PIPING. Installation Charges: No Difference Installation of COMPOSITE PIPING is almost same as other all piping 50 Rs. Per Inch Per Mtr. So no difference in installation charges compare to any other piping options

7 Annexure: 4. Warrantee / Life Expectancy Chart as per DIN 8077 /78 TEMPERATURE Of Deg 0 C TIME IN OPERATION (YEARS) PRESSURE LINE PN 10 PN 12.5 PN 16 PN 20 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE OVER PRESSURE to 50 Deg Temperature 51 to 100 deg

8 Annexure: 5.SUPPORT DISTANCE CHART FOR COMPOSITE PIPE Table to determine support intervals with respect to Temperature & outside Diameter for Water & Fluid Transmission Outside Diameter Temperature Of Deg 0 C Support Intervals in cms. OD(mm)

9 Annexure: 6 PHOTOGRAPHS FOR INSTALED ANJNEY COMPOSITE PIPE & FITTINGS Subject:-Utility Line Photo Subject:-Process Piping Subject:- Highly Corrosive Chemical Application Subject:-Acid Line Application

10