DeKalb County School District/Elementary Schools Clifton Elementary Final School Assessment Report May 19, 2016

Transcription

1 DeKalb County School District/Elementary Schools Clifton Elementary Final School Assessment Report May 19, 2016 PARSONS

2 School Assessment Report Table of Contents School Executive Summary 4 School Condition Summary Storage Building 8 Executive Summary 8 Condition Summary 9 Photo Album 10 Condition Detail 11 System Listing 12 Renewal Schedule 13 Forecasted Sustainment Requirement 14 Deficiency Summary By System 15 Deficiency Summary By Priority 16 Deficiency By Priority Investment 17 Deficiency Summary By Category 18 Deficiency Details By Priority , 1968 Building 20 Executive Summary 20 Condition Summary 21 Photo Album 22 Condition Detail 23 System Listing 24 Renewal Schedule 25 Forecasted Sustainment Requirement 26 Deficiency Summary By System 27 Deficiency Summary By Priority 28 Deficiency By Priority Investment 29 Deficiency Summary By Category 30 Deficiency Details By Priority Gym 32 Page 2 of 60

3 School Assessment Report Executive Summary 32 Condition Summary 33 Photo Album 34 Condition Detail 35 System Listing 36 Renewal Schedule 37 Forecasted Sustainment Requirement 38 Deficiency Summary By System 39 Deficiency Summary By Priority 40 Deficiency By Priority Investment 41 Deficiency Summary By Category 42 Deficiency Details By Priority 43 Site 44 Executive Summary 44 Condition Summary 45 Photo Album 46 Condition Detail 47 System Listing 48 Renewal Schedule 49 Forecasted Sustainment Requirement 50 Deficiency Summary By System 51 Deficiency Summary By Priority 52 Deficiency By Priority Investment 53 Deficiency Summary By Category 54 Deficiency Details By Priority 55 Glossary 56 Page 3 of 60

4 School Assessment Report - Clifton Elementary School Executive Summary Building condition is evaluated based on the functional systems and elements of a building and organized according to the UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification. The grouping of these systems and elements and applying a current replacement value to them develops a representative building cost model. Cost Models are developed for similar building types and functions. Systems and their elements are evaluated based on their current replacement values, life cycles, installation dates and next renewal dates. Systems and their elements that are within their useful lives are further evaluated to identify current deficient conditions that may have a significant impact on a system's or element's remaining service life, and to determine if they are beyond their predicted expected life. The system's or element's current replacement value is based on RS Means Commercial Cost Data. Following are the cost model's system details for this facility. The Replacement Value is the amount needed to replace the property of the same present scope. The Repair Cost (the sum of the cost to repair/replace the Deficiencies) represents the budgeted contractor-installed costs plus owner's soft costs for the repair, replacement or renewal for a component or system level deficiency. It excludes contributing costs for other components or systems that might also be associated with the corrective actions due to packaging of the work. Facility Condition Index ( FCI) is an industry-standard measurement of facility condition calculated as the ratio of the costs to correct a facility's deficiencies (Condition Needs) to the facility's Current Replacement Value. It ranges from 0% (new) to 100% (very poor - beyond service life). The Remaining Service Life Index (RSLI) is calculated as the sum of a renewable system's Remaining Service Life (RSL) divided by the sum of a system's Replacement Value (both values exclude soft-cost to simplify calculation updates) expressed as a percentage ranging from 100% (new) to 0% (expired). The relationship between the key metrics FCI and RSLI is an important indicator, at either the facility, building, system, or component levels, of the condition trend and the imminent need for capital renewal. These indices exist in an inverse relationship wherein the FCI increases when systems reach their expected life-cycle age, whereas the RSLI decreases annually indicating the relative time remaining before reaching the life-cycle expiration age. For example, a facility or a system with a high RSLI and a low FCI indicates it is in the early portion of its useful life. However, a low RSLI indicates that expiration dates are approaching at which point the FCI would increase. The term FCA Score is the inverse of Total FCI and calculated as 100-Total FCI (without the %) where 100 is best and 0 is worst condition. Gross Area (SF): Year Built: 47, Last Renovation: Replacement Value: Repair Cost: Total FCI: Total RSLI: $1,930,674 $2,123, % 0.00 % FCA Score: 0.00 Description: The Clifton Elementary School campus consists of two buildings located at 3132 Clifton Church Road SE in Atlanta, Georgia. The original campus was constructed in 1967, an addition to the main school building was constructed in 1968, and a gymnasium building and covered walkway were constructed in This report contains condition and adequacy data collected during the 2015 Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). Detailed condition and deficiency statements are contained in this report for each building and site improvement on the campus. As part of the FCA, the DeKalb County School District facilities staff asked Parsons to conduct a visual condition assessment of the buildings and sites, determine their physical condition, and make recommendations on either renovating or demolishing the schools. This report provides a description of the building and site systems, summarizes their physical condition, and includes Parsons' recommendation for future actions. MAIN BUILDING Page 4 of 60

5 School Assessment Report - Clifton Elementary Exterior Envelope and Roof Systems: The building is a two-story masonry building and is set on standard concrete foundations and slab on grade. Visible sections of the foundation and concrete slab were found to be in fair condition. The exterior walls are constructed of concrete masonry unit blocks with a brick veneer. Several areas of the exterior walls have cracked or broken masonry and deteriorated mortar joints. The exterior walls are in overall marginal condition. Exterior windows are a combination of original fixed and operating steel units. Many of the exterior windows have deteriorated beyond repair and are in poor condition. The exterior doors are steel units set on steel frames. Like the exterior windows, the exterior doors are rusted, aged, and are beyond repair. The roof is constructed of steel joists with a concrete deck and is covered with a built-up roof covering. The steel roof joists are corroded with significant areas of pitting and loss of base metal throughout. Large sections of the roof covering are damaged and the remaining sections are deteriorated beyond repair. The roof structure and covering are in poor condition and beyond repair. While the concrete foundation and slab are in fair condition and the exterior walls could conceivably be repaired, the exterior windows and doors, roof structure and roof coverings are beyond repair. Overall the exterior envelope and roof of the building are beyond economic repair or renovation. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction. Interior Systems: The interior floor finishes appear to be a combination of original vinyl tile, ceramic tile, and carpet covering the concrete floor slab. The floor finishes are damaged and deteriorated beyond repair and are in poor condition. Interior wall partitions are constructed of a combination of concrete masonry units and gypsum board on wood studs. Interior wall finishes are a combination of ceramic wall tile, painted masonry, and painted gypsum board. Large sections of the interior wall partitions have been damaged, have impact damage, and are beyond repair. The interior wall partitions are beyond repair. Sections of remaining interior wall finishes are stained and marred. The interior wall finishes are in poor condition and deteriorated beyond repair. The interior ceilings are a combination of suspended acoustical tile, painted gypsum board, and mineral fiber tile. The interior ceilings are in poor condition and are damaged beyond repair. Interior fittings in the building such as the restroom partitions and accessories, lockers, and blackboards are deteriorated. Overall, the interior of the building is in poor condition. The interior building systems are deteriorated beyond repair. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction. Plumbing Systems: The plumbing fixtures, water distribution, and sanitary systems are deteriorated beyond economical repair. The plumbing system is damaged and deteriorated beyond economical repair or renovation. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction. Heating and Ventilation Systems: The heating and ventilation systems are worn, damaged, or deteriorated beyond economical repair or renovation. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction. Electrical Systems: The electrical systems, including the service and distribution, lighting and branch wiring, and security systems, are operable but are unsafe. These systems and their components have been damaged and are deteriorated beyond economical repair. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction. Equipment and Fixed Furnishings: Equipment and fixed furnishings are beyond economical repair or renovation. Demolition and removal of these building systems is recommended and scheduled upon completion of the new school which is under construction GYMNASIUM The 2003 Gymnasium is a metal building with partial brick veneer exterior walls, no exterior windows, a metal roof structure and covering, and abandoned plumbing and HVAC systems. The electrical system is operational. Overall, the 2003 Gymnasium appears salvageable, but the main building and site present a significant safety and liability hazard, and it is recommended that the 2003 Gymnasium be demolished and removed in conjunction with the main building and site utilities and infrastructure. Appropriate hazardous material testing of the building and site will be needed to determine the required methods of hazardous material remediation, if required. SITE The Clifton Elementary School site was originally constructed in 1967, has a total area of 16 acres, and is occupied by approximately 47,671 square feet of permanent building space. The site includes remnants of concrete and asphalt paved roads and parking, concrete sidewalks, metal fencing, construction fencing, and landscaping, which are damaged, and water, sanitary and electrical utilities, which are operable. All site systems are undergoing remediation due to the new construction on site. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Page 5 of 60

6 School Assessment Report - Clifton Elementary The Clifton Elementary School main building is in overall poor condition. A majority of the building and site systems and components are damaged, deteriorated, or worn beyond economical repair or renovation. The main building and 2003 gymnasium, covered walkway, and site are to be demolished and removed upon completion of the new school in one year. Appropriate hazardous material testing of the building and site will be needed to determine the required methods of hazardous material remediation. Attributes: General Attributes: Assigned Region: Region 5 Board District: District 3 DOE Facility: 5053 Geographic Region: Region 5 HS Attendance Area: McNair, Ronald E. HS Jurisdictional City: DeKalb County (Unincorporated) Site Acreage: 16 Page 6 of 60

7 School Assessment Report - Clifton Elementary School Condition Summary The Table below shows the RSLI and FCI for each major system shown at the UNIFORMAT classification Level II. Note that Systems with lower FCIs require less investment than systems with higher FCIs. Current Investment Requirement and Condition by Uniformat Classification UNIFORMAT Classification RSLI% FCI % Current Repair G10 - Site Preparation 0.00 % % $2,123, Totals: 0.00 % % $2,123, Condition Deficiency Priority Gross Facility Name Area (S.F.) FCI % 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Priority 1967 Storage Building $0.00 $0.00 $3, $0.00 $ , 1968 Building 42, $0.00 $0.00 $979, $0.00 $ Gym 5, $0.00 $0.00 $127, $0.00 $0.00 Site 47, $0.00 $0.00 $1,013, $0.00 $0.00 Deficiencies By Priority Total: $0.00 $0.00 $2,123, $0.00 $ Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority - $2,123, Priority 5 Priority Budget Estimate Total: $2,123, Page 7 of 60

8 School Assessment Report Storage Building Executive Summary Building condition is evaluated based on the functional systems and elements of a building and organized according to the UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification. The grouping of these systems and elements and applying a current replacement value to them develops a representative building cost model. Cost Models are developed for similar building types and functions. Systems and their elements are evaluated based on their current replacement values, life cycles, installation dates and next renewal dates. Systems and their elements that are within their useful lives are further evaluated to identify current deficient conditions that may have a significant impact on a system's or element's remaining service life, and to determine if they are beyond their predicted expected life. The system's or element's current replacement value is based on RS Means Commercial Cost Data. Following are the cost model's system details for this facility. The Replacement Value is the amount needed to replace the property of the same present scope. The Repair Cost (the sum of the cost to repair/replace the Deficiencies) represents the budgeted contractor-installed costs plus owner's soft costs for the repair, replacement or renewal for a component or system level deficiency. It excludes contributing costs for other components or systems that might also be associated with the corrective actions due to packaging of the work. Facility Condition Index ( FCI) is an industry-standard measurement of facility condition calculated as the ratio of the costs to correct a facility's deficiencies (Condition Needs) to the facility's Current Replacement Value. It ranges from 0% (new) to 100% (very poor - beyond service life). The Remaining Service Life Index (RSLI) is calculated as the sum of a renewable system's Remaining Service Life (RSL) divided by the sum of a system's Replacement Value (both values exclude soft-cost to simplify calculation updates) expressed as a percentage ranging from 100% (new) to 0% (expired). The relationship between the key metrics FCI and RSLI is an important indicator, at either the facility, building, system, or component levels, of the condition trend and the imminent need for capital renewal. These indices exist in an inverse relationship wherein the FCI increases when systems reach their expected life-cycle age, whereas the RSLI decreases annually indicating the relative time remaining before reaching the life-cycle expiration age. For example, a facility or a system with a high RSLI and a low FCI indicates it is in the early portion of its useful life. However, a low RSLI indicates that expiration dates are approaching at which point the FCI would increase. The term FCA Score is the inverse of Total FCI and calculated as 100-Total FCI (without the %) where 100 is best and 0 is worst condition. Function: Gross Area (SF): Year Built: Elementary School Last Renovation: Replacement Value: Repair Cost: Total FCI: Total RSLI: $3,048 $3, % 0.00 % FCA Score: 0.00 Description: The storage building is scheduled for demolition after the completion of the new elementary school, which is currently under construction. This report contains condition and adequacy data collected during the 2015 Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). Detailed condition and deficiency statements are contained in this report. Attributes: General Attributes: Building Codes: Fire Sprinkler System: No Page 8 of 60

9 School Assessment Report Storage Building Condition Summary The Table below shows the RSLI and FCI for each major building system shown at the UNIFORMAT classification Level II. Note that Systems with lower FCIs require less investment than systems with higher FCIs. UNIFORMAT Classification RSLI % FCI % Current Repair Cost G10 - Site Preparation 0.00 % % $3, Totals: 0.00 % % $3, Page 9 of 60

10 School Assessment Report Storage Building Photo Album The photo album consists of the various cardinal directions of the building. 1). South Elevation - Jul 22, ). East Elevation - Jul 22, ). West Elevation - Jul 22, ). Northwest Elevation - Jul 22, 2015 Page 10 of 60

11 School Assessment Report Storage Building Condition Detail This section of the report contains results of the Facility Condition Assessment. The building is separated into system components based on UNIFORMAT II. The columns in the System Listing table represent the following: 1. System Code: A code that identifies the system. 2. System Description: A brief description of a system present in the building. 3. Unit Price $: The unit price of the system. 4. UoM: The unit of measure of the system. 5. Qty: The quantity for the system. 6. Life: Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) recommended system design life. 7. Year Installed: The date of system installation. 8. Calc Next Renewal Year: The date of system expiration based on the life, NR stands for non renewable. 9. Next Renewal Year: The suggested system expiration date by the assessor based on visual inspection. 10. RSLI: The Remaining Service Life Index of the system. 11. FCI: The Facility Condition Index of the system. 12. RSL: Remaining Service Life in years. 13. ecr: ecomet Condition Rating (not used in this assessment). 14. Deficiency $: The financial investment to repair/replace system to address deficiency. 15. Replacement Value $: The replacement cost of the system. Page 11 of 60

12 School Assessment Report Storage Building System Listing The System Listing table below lists each of the systems organized by their UNIFORMAT II classification. The assessment team was tasked with recording the most recent replacement year of each system, determining the remaining service life based on the theoretical life, and evaluating the condition to confirm the forecast next replacement year. The system listing is the basis for all data contained in the Building Assessment Report. System Code System Description Unit Price $ UoM Qty Life Year Installed Calc Next Renewal Year Next Renewal Year RSLI% FCI% RSL ecr Deficiency $ Replacement Value $ G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $21.17 S.F % % -38 $3, $3,048 Total 0.00 % % $3, $3,048 Page 12 of 60

13 School Assessment Report Storage Building Renewal Schedule ecomet forecasts future Capital Renewal projects for expiring systems based on the Calculated Next Renewal year found in the system listing. There is a 3% yearly inflation factor applied to the system costs expiring in the future. The table below reflects Capital Renewal projects over the next 10 years. Note: Blank cells (or $0) indicate no systems are scheduled for renewal in that year. Inflation Rate: 3% System Current Deficiencies Total Total: $3,353 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,506 $7,859 G - Building Sitework $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G10 - Site Preparation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G Site Demolitions and Relocations $3,353 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,506 $7,859 * Indicates non-renewable system Page 13 of 60

14 School Assessment Report Storage Building Forecasted Capital Renewal Requirement The following chart shows the current building deficiencies and the forecasted capital renewal (system replacement) requirements over the next ten years. $5,000 $4,506 $4,000 $3,353 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Current Deficiencies Page 14 of 60

15 School Assessment Report Storage Building Deficiency Summary by System Current deficiencies include assemblies that have reached or exceed their design life or components of the assemblies that are in need of repair. Assemblies that have reached their design life are identified as current deficiencies and assigned the distress 'Beyond Service Life'. The following chart lists all current deficiencies associated with this facility broken down by UNIFORMAT system. G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $3, Budget Estimate Total: $3, Page 15 of 60

16 School Assessment Report Storage Building Deficiency Summary by Priority The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by priority. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority - $3, Priority 5 Priority Budget Estimate Total: $3, Page 16 of 60

17 School Assessment Report Storage Building Deficiency By Priority Investment Table The table below shows the current investment cost grouped by deficiency priority and building system. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: Priority 1 deficiencies require immediate review to correct a poten al life/safety hazard, stop accelerated deteriora on, or return a facility to opera on. Priority 2 deficiencies could become a Priority 1 deficiency, if not corrected within the next 2-3 years. These include intermi ent opera ons, rapid deteriora on, or poten al life/safety hazards.. Priority 3 deficiencies require appropriate a en on to preclude predictable deteriora on or poten al down me and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further and not completed within the next 3-5 years. Priority 4 deficiencies represent a sensible improvement to exis ng condi ons. The recommended improvements are not required for the basic func onality of the facility; however addressing these deficiencies will improve overall usability and/or reduce long term maintenance costs. Repairs for these deficiencies may be budgeted and scheduled for comple on within the next 5-7 years. Priority 5 deficiencies will include condi ons that have no impact on the func on or usability of the facility, such as appearance. No ac on is required for these deficiencies, but they are tracked since they may require future inspec on or be completed as part of related repairs in con guous areas of the facility. System Code System Description Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $0.00 $0.00 $3, $0.00 $0.00 $3, Total: $0.00 $0.00 $3, $0.00 $0.00 $3, Page 17 of 60

18 School Assessment Report Storage Building Deficiency Summary by Category The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by deficiency categories. Assessors assigned deficiencies to one of the following categories: Deferred Maintenance - $3, Budget Estimate Total: $3, Page 18 of 60

19 School Assessment Report Storage Building Deficiency Details by Priority The deficiency detail notes listed below provide additional information on identified deficiencies found within the facility. Priority 3 Priority: System: G Site Demolitions and Relocations Location: Distress: Category: Priority: Correction: Qty: Unit of Measure: Estimate: Assessor Name: Date Created: Entire Building Beyond Service Life Deferred Maintenance 3 Priority Renew System S.F. $3, Charles Gulley 07/30/2015 Notes: The building is scheduled for demolition upon completion of the new school. This deficiency is for demolition and removal of the building. Page 19 of 60

20 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Executive Summary Building condition is evaluated based on the functional systems and elements of a building and organized according to the UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification. The grouping of these systems and elements and applying a current replacement value to them develops a representative building cost model. Cost Models are developed for similar building types and functions. Systems and their elements are evaluated based on their current replacement values, life cycles, installation dates and next renewal dates. Systems and their elements that are within their useful lives are further evaluated to identify current deficient conditions that may have a significant impact on a system's or element's remaining service life, and to determine if they are beyond their predicted expected life. The system's or element's current replacement value is based on RS Means Commercial Cost Data. Following are the cost model's system details for this facility. The Replacement Value is the amount needed to replace the property of the same present scope. The Repair Cost (the sum of the cost to repair/replace the Deficiencies) represents the budgeted contractor-installed costs plus owner's soft costs for the repair, replacement or renewal for a component or system level deficiency. It excludes contributing costs for other components or systems that might also be associated with the corrective actions due to packaging of the work. Facility Condition Index ( FCI) is an industry-standard measurement of facility condition calculated as the ratio of the costs to correct a facility's deficiencies (Condition Needs) to the facility's Current Replacement Value. It ranges from 0% (new) to 100% (very poor - beyond service life). The Remaining Service Life Index (RSLI) is calculated as the sum of a renewable system's Remaining Service Life (RSL) divided by the sum of a system's Replacement Value (both values exclude soft-cost to simplify calculation updates) expressed as a percentage ranging from 100% (new) to 0% (expired). The relationship between the key metrics FCI and RSLI is an important indicator, at either the facility, building, system, or component levels, of the condition trend and the imminent need for capital renewal. These indices exist in an inverse relationship wherein the FCI increases when systems reach their expected life-cycle age, whereas the RSLI decreases annually indicating the relative time remaining before reaching the life-cycle expiration age. For example, a facility or a system with a high RSLI and a low FCI indicates it is in the early portion of its useful life. However, a low RSLI indicates that expiration dates are approaching at which point the FCI would increase. The term FCA Score is the inverse of Total FCI and calculated as 100-Total FCI (without the %) where 100 is best and 0 is worst condition. Function: Gross Area (SF): Year Built: Elementary School 42, Last Renovation: Replacement Value: Repair Cost: Total FCI: Total RSLI: $890,177 $979, % 0.00 % FCA Score: 0.00 Description: The main building at Clifton Elementary School is scheduled for demolition at the completion of the new elementary school, which is currently under construction. This report contains condition and adequacy data collected during the 2015 Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). Detailed condition and deficiency statements are contained in this report. Attributes: General Attributes: Building Codes: 2010, 2011 Fire Sprinkler System: No Page 20 of 60

21 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Condition Summary The Table below shows the RSLI and FCI for each major building system shown at the UNIFORMAT classification Level II. Note that Systems with lower FCIs require less investment than systems with higher FCIs. UNIFORMAT Classification RSLI % FCI % Current Repair Cost G10 - Site Preparation 0.00 % % $979, Totals: 0.00 % % $979, Page 21 of 60

22 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Photo Album The photo album consists of the various cardinal directions of the building. 1). South Elevation - Jul 21, ). North Elevation - Jul 21, ). East Elevation - Jul 21, ). West Elevation - Jul 21, 2015 Page 22 of 60

23 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Condition Detail This section of the report contains results of the Facility Condition Assessment. The building is separated into system components based on UNIFORMAT II. The columns in the System Listing table represent the following: 1. System Code: A code that identifies the system. 2. System Description: A brief description of a system present in the building. 3. Unit Price $: The unit price of the system. 4. UoM: The unit of measure of the system. 5. Qty: The quantity for the system. 6. Life: Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) recommended system design life. 7. Year Installed: The date of system installation. 8. Calc Next Renewal Year: The date of system expiration based on the life, NR stands for non renewable. 9. Next Renewal Year: The suggested system expiration date by the assessor based on visual inspection. 10. RSLI: The Remaining Service Life Index of the system. 11. FCI: The Facility Condition Index of the system. 12. RSL: Remaining Service Life in years. 13. ecr: ecomet Condition Rating (not used in this assessment). 14. Deficiency $: The financial investment to repair/replace system to address deficiency. 15. Replacement Value $: The replacement cost of the system. Page 23 of 60

24 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building System Listing The System Listing table below lists each of the systems organized by their UNIFORMAT II classification. The assessment team was tasked with recording the most recent replacement year of each system, determining the remaining service life based on the theoretical life, and evaluating the condition to confirm the forecast next replacement year. The system listing is the basis for all data contained in the Building Assessment Report. System Code System Description Unit Price $ UoM Qty Life Year Installed Calc Next Renewal Year Next Renewal Year RSLI% FCI% RSL ecr Deficiency $ Replacement Value $ G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $21.17 S.F. 42, % % -38 $979, $890,177 Total 0.00 % % $979, $890,177 Page 24 of 60

25 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Renewal Schedule ecomet forecasts future Capital Renewal projects for expiring systems based on the Calculated Next Renewal year found in the system listing. There is a 3% yearly inflation factor applied to the system costs expiring in the future. The table below reflects Capital Renewal projects over the next 10 years. Note: Blank cells (or $0) indicate no systems are scheduled for renewal in that year. Inflation Rate: 3% System Current Deficiencies Total Total: $979,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,315,956 $2,295,151 G - Building Sitework $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G10 - Site Preparation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G Site Demolitions and Relocations $979,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,315,956 $2,295,151 * Indicates non-renewable system Page 25 of 60

26 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Forecasted Capital Renewal Requirement The following chart shows the current building deficiencies and the forecasted capital renewal (system replacement) requirements over the next ten years. $1,500,000 $1,315,956 $1,000,000 $979,195 $500,000 $0 Current Deficiencies Page 26 of 60

27 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Deficiency Summary by System Current deficiencies include assemblies that have reached or exceed their design life or components of the assemblies that are in need of repair. Assemblies that have reached their design life are identified as current deficiencies and assigned the distress 'Beyond Service Life'. The following chart lists all current deficiencies associated with this facility broken down by UNIFORMAT system. G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $979, Budget Estimate Total: $979, Page 27 of 60

28 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Deficiency Summary by Priority The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by priority. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority - $979, Priority 5 Priority Budget Estimate Total: $979, Page 28 of 60

29 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Deficiency By Priority Investment Table The table below shows the current investment cost grouped by deficiency priority and building system. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: Priority 1 deficiencies require immediate review to correct a poten al life/safety hazard, stop accelerated deteriora on, or return a facility to opera on. Priority 2 deficiencies could become a Priority 1 deficiency, if not corrected within the next 2-3 years. These include intermi ent opera ons, rapid deteriora on, or poten al life/safety hazards.. Priority 3 deficiencies require appropriate a en on to preclude predictable deteriora on or poten al down me and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further and not completed within the next 3-5 years. Priority 4 deficiencies represent a sensible improvement to exis ng condi ons. The recommended improvements are not required for the basic func onality of the facility; however addressing these deficiencies will improve overall usability and/or reduce long term maintenance costs. Repairs for these deficiencies may be budgeted and scheduled for comple on within the next 5-7 years. Priority 5 deficiencies will include condi ons that have no impact on the func on or usability of the facility, such as appearance. No ac on is required for these deficiencies, but they are tracked since they may require future inspec on or be completed as part of related repairs in con guous areas of the facility. System Code System Description Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $0.00 $0.00 $979, $0.00 $0.00 $979, Total: $0.00 $0.00 $979, $0.00 $0.00 $979, Page 29 of 60

30 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Deficiency Summary by Category The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by deficiency categories. Assessors assigned deficiencies to one of the following categories: Deferred Maintenance - $979, Budget Estimate Total: $979, Page 30 of 60

31 School Assessment Report , 1968 Building Deficiency Details by Priority The deficiency detail notes listed below provide additional information on identified deficiencies found within the facility. Priority 3 Priority: System: G Site Demolitions and Relocations Location: Distress: Category: Priority: Correction: Qty: Unit of Measure: Estimate: Assessor Name: Date Created: Entire Building Beyond Service Life Deferred Maintenance 3 Priority Renew System 42, S.F. $979, Charles Gulley 07/30/2015 Notes: The building is scheduled for demolition upon completion of the new school. This deficiency is for demolition and removal of the building. Page 31 of 60

32 School Assessment Report Gym Executive Summary Building condition is evaluated based on the functional systems and elements of a building and organized according to the UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification. The grouping of these systems and elements and applying a current replacement value to them develops a representative building cost model. Cost Models are developed for similar building types and functions. Systems and their elements are evaluated based on their current replacement values, life cycles, installation dates and next renewal dates. Systems and their elements that are within their useful lives are further evaluated to identify current deficient conditions that may have a significant impact on a system's or element's remaining service life, and to determine if they are beyond their predicted expected life. The system's or element's current replacement value is based on RS Means Commercial Cost Data. Following are the cost model's system details for this facility. The Replacement Value is the amount needed to replace the property of the same present scope. The Repair Cost (the sum of the cost to repair/replace the Deficiencies) represents the budgeted contractor-installed costs plus owner's soft costs for the repair, replacement or renewal for a component or system level deficiency. It excludes contributing costs for other components or systems that might also be associated with the corrective actions due to packaging of the work. Facility Condition Index ( FCI) is an industry-standard measurement of facility condition calculated as the ratio of the costs to correct a facility's deficiencies (Condition Needs) to the facility's Current Replacement Value. It ranges from 0% (new) to 100% (very poor - beyond service life). The Remaining Service Life Index (RSLI) is calculated as the sum of a renewable system's Remaining Service Life (RSL) divided by the sum of a system's Replacement Value (both values exclude soft-cost to simplify calculation updates) expressed as a percentage ranging from 100% (new) to 0% (expired). The relationship between the key metrics FCI and RSLI is an important indicator, at either the facility, building, system, or component levels, of the condition trend and the imminent need for capital renewal. These indices exist in an inverse relationship wherein the FCI increases when systems reach their expected life-cycle age, whereas the RSLI decreases annually indicating the relative time remaining before reaching the life-cycle expiration age. For example, a facility or a system with a high RSLI and a low FCI indicates it is in the early portion of its useful life. However, a low RSLI indicates that expiration dates are approaching at which point the FCI would increase. The term FCA Score is the inverse of Total FCI and calculated as 100-Total FCI (without the %) where 100 is best and 0 is worst condition. Function: Gross Area (SF): Year Built: Elementary School 5, Last Renovation: Replacement Value: Repair Cost: Total FCI: Total RSLI: $115,969 $127, % 0.00 % FCA Score: 0.00 Description: The 2003 gymnasium is scheduled for demolition after the completion of the new elementary school, which is currently under construction. This report contains condition and adequacy data collected during the 2015 Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). Detailed condition and deficiency statements are contained in this report. Attributes: General Attributes: Building Codes: 2020 Fire Sprinkler System: No Page 32 of 60

33 School Assessment Report Gym Condition Summary The Table below shows the RSLI and FCI for each major building system shown at the UNIFORMAT classification Level II. Note that Systems with lower FCIs require less investment than systems with higher FCIs. UNIFORMAT Classification RSLI % FCI % Current Repair Cost G10 - Site Preparation 0.00 % % $127, Totals: 0.00 % % $127, Page 33 of 60

34 School Assessment Report Gym Photo Album The photo album consists of the various cardinal directions of the building. 1). West Elevation - Jul 22, ). North Elevation - Jul 22, ). Northwest Elevation - Jul 22, ). East Elevation - Jul 22, 2015 Page 34 of 60

35 School Assessment Report Gym Condition Detail This section of the report contains results of the Facility Condition Assessment. The building is separated into system components based on UNIFORMAT II. The columns in the System Listing table represent the following: 1. System Code: A code that identifies the system. 2. System Description: A brief description of a system present in the building. 3. Unit Price $: The unit price of the system. 4. UoM: The unit of measure of the system. 5. Qty: The quantity for the system. 6. Life: Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) recommended system design life. 7. Year Installed: The date of system installation. 8. Calc Next Renewal Year: The date of system expiration based on the life, NR stands for non renewable. 9. Next Renewal Year: The suggested system expiration date by the assessor based on visual inspection. 10. RSLI: The Remaining Service Life Index of the system. 11. FCI: The Facility Condition Index of the system. 12. RSL: Remaining Service Life in years. 13. ecr: ecomet Condition Rating (not used in this assessment). 14. Deficiency $: The financial investment to repair/replace system to address deficiency. 15. Replacement Value $: The replacement cost of the system. Page 35 of 60

36 School Assessment Report Gym System Listing The System Listing table below lists each of the systems organized by their UNIFORMAT II classification. The assessment team was tasked with recording the most recent replacement year of each system, determining the remaining service life based on the theoretical life, and evaluating the condition to confirm the forecast next replacement year. The system listing is the basis for all data contained in the Building Assessment Report. System Code System Description Unit Price $ UoM Qty Life Year Installed Calc Next Renewal Year Next Renewal Year RSLI% FCI% RSL ecr Deficiency $ Replacement Value $ G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $21.17 S.F. 5, % % -2 $127, $115,969 Total 0.00 % % $127, $115,969 Page 36 of 60

37 School Assessment Report Gym Renewal Schedule ecomet forecasts future Capital Renewal projects for expiring systems based on the Calculated Next Renewal year found in the system listing. There is a 3% yearly inflation factor applied to the system costs expiring in the future. The table below reflects Capital Renewal projects over the next 10 years. Note: Blank cells (or $0) indicate no systems are scheduled for renewal in that year. Inflation Rate: 3% System Current Deficiencies Total Total: $127,566 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,438 $299,004 G - Building Sitework $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G10 - Site Preparation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G Site Demolitions and Relocations $127,566 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,438 $299,004 * Indicates non-renewable system Page 37 of 60

38 School Assessment Report Gym Forecasted Capital Renewal Requirement The following chart shows the current building deficiencies and the forecasted capital renewal (system replacement) requirements over the next ten years. $200,000 $171,438 $150,000 $127,566 $100,000 $50,000 $0 Current Deficiencies Page 38 of 60

39 School Assessment Report Gym Deficiency Summary by System Current deficiencies include assemblies that have reached or exceed their design life or components of the assemblies that are in need of repair. Assemblies that have reached their design life are identified as current deficiencies and assigned the distress 'Beyond Service Life'. The following chart lists all current deficiencies associated with this facility broken down by UNIFORMAT system. G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $127, Budget Estimate Total: $127, Page 39 of 60

40 School Assessment Report Gym Deficiency Summary by Priority The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by priority. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority - $127, Priority 5 Priority Budget Estimate Total: $127, Page 40 of 60

41 School Assessment Report Gym Deficiency By Priority Investment Table The table below shows the current investment cost grouped by deficiency priority and building system. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: Priority 1 deficiencies require immediate review to correct a poten al life/safety hazard, stop accelerated deteriora on, or return a facility to opera on. Priority 2 deficiencies could become a Priority 1 deficiency, if not corrected within the next 2-3 years. These include intermi ent opera ons, rapid deteriora on, or poten al life/safety hazards.. Priority 3 deficiencies require appropriate a en on to preclude predictable deteriora on or poten al down me and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further and not completed within the next 3-5 years. Priority 4 deficiencies represent a sensible improvement to exis ng condi ons. The recommended improvements are not required for the basic func onality of the facility; however addressing these deficiencies will improve overall usability and/or reduce long term maintenance costs. Repairs for these deficiencies may be budgeted and scheduled for comple on within the next 5-7 years. Priority 5 deficiencies will include condi ons that have no impact on the func on or usability of the facility, such as appearance. No ac on is required for these deficiencies, but they are tracked since they may require future inspec on or be completed as part of related repairs in con guous areas of the facility. System Code System Description Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $0.00 $0.00 $127, $0.00 $0.00 $127, Total: $0.00 $0.00 $127, $0.00 $0.00 $127, Page 41 of 60

42 School Assessment Report Gym Deficiency Summary by Category The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by deficiency categories. Assessors assigned deficiencies to one of the following categories: Deferred Maintenance - $127, Budget Estimate Total: $127, Page 42 of 60

43 School Assessment Report Gym Deficiency Details by Priority The deficiency detail notes listed below provide additional information on identified deficiencies found within the facility. Priority 3 Priority: System: G Site Demolitions and Relocations Location: Distress: Category: Priority: Correction: Qty: Unit of Measure: Estimate: Assessor Name: Date Created: Entire Building Beyond Service Life Deferred Maintenance 3 Priority Renew System 5, S.F. $127, Ben Nixon 07/30/2015 Notes: The building is scheduled for demolition upon completion of the new school. This deficiency is for demolition and removal of the building. Page 43 of 60

44 School Assessment Report - Site Executive Summary Building condition is evaluated based on the functional systems and elements of a building and organized according to the UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification. The grouping of these systems and elements and applying a current replacement value to them develops a representative building cost model. Cost Models are developed for similar building types and functions. Systems and their elements are evaluated based on their current replacement values, life cycles, installation dates and next renewal dates. Systems and their elements that are within their useful lives are further evaluated to identify current deficient conditions that may have a significant impact on a system's or element's remaining service life, and to determine if they are beyond their predicted expected life. The system's or element's current replacement value is based on RS Means Commercial Cost Data. Following are the cost model's system details for this facility. The Replacement Value is the amount needed to replace the property of the same present scope. The Repair Cost (the sum of the cost to repair/replace the Deficiencies) represents the budgeted contractor-installed costs plus owner's soft costs for the repair, replacement or renewal for a component or system level deficiency. It excludes contributing costs for other components or systems that might also be associated with the corrective actions due to packaging of the work. Facility Condition Index ( FCI) is an industry-standard measurement of facility condition calculated as the ratio of the costs to correct a facility's deficiencies (Condition Needs) to the facility's Current Replacement Value. It ranges from 0% (new) to 100% (very poor - beyond service life). The Remaining Service Life Index (RSLI) is calculated as the sum of a renewable system's Remaining Service Life (RSL) divided by the sum of a system's Replacement Value (both values exclude soft-cost to simplify calculation updates) expressed as a percentage ranging from 100% (new) to 0% (expired). The relationship between the key metrics FCI and RSLI is an important indicator, at either the facility, building, system, or component levels, of the condition trend and the imminent need for capital renewal. These indices exist in an inverse relationship wherein the FCI increases when systems reach their expected life-cycle age, whereas the RSLI decreases annually indicating the relative time remaining before reaching the life-cycle expiration age. For example, a facility or a system with a high RSLI and a low FCI indicates it is in the early portion of its useful life. However, a low RSLI indicates that expiration dates are approaching at which point the FCI would increase. The term FCA Score is the inverse of Total FCI and calculated as 100-Total FCI (without the %) where 100 is best and 0 is worst condition. Function: Gross Area (SF): Year Built: Elementary School 47, Last Renovation: Replacement Value: Repair Cost: Total FCI: Total RSLI: $921,480 $1,013, % 0.00 % FCA Score: 0.00 Description: The existing Clifton Elementary School site is scheduled for demolition at the completion of the new elementary school site, which is currently under construction. This report contains condition and adequacy data collected during the 2015 Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). Detailed condition and deficiency statements are contained in this report. Attributes: General Attributes: Site Code: 1140 Page 44 of 60

45 School Assessment Report - Site Condition Summary The Table below shows the RSLI and FCI for each major building system shown at the UNIFORMAT classification Level II. Note that Systems with lower FCIs require less investment than systems with higher FCIs. UNIFORMAT Classification RSLI % FCI % Current Repair Cost G10 - Site Preparation 0.00 % % $1,013, Totals: 0.00 % % $1,013, Page 45 of 60

46 School Assessment Report - Site Photo Album The photo album consists of the various cardinal directions of the building. 1). Aerial Image of Clifton Elementary School - Jul 16, ). Parking Lot - Jul 22, ). Hard Surface Play Area - Jul 22, ). Covered Walkway - Jul 22, 2015 Page 46 of 60

47 School Assessment Report - Site Condition Detail This section of the report contains results of the Facility Condition Assessment. The building is separated into system components based on UNIFORMAT II. The columns in the System Listing table represent the following: 1. System Code: A code that identifies the system. 2. System Description: A brief description of a system present in the building. 3. Unit Price $: The unit price of the system. 4. UoM: The unit of measure of the system. 5. Qty: The quantity for the system. 6. Life: Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) recommended system design life. 7. Year Installed: The date of system installation. 8. Calc Next Renewal Year: The date of system expiration based on the life, NR stands for non renewable. 9. Next Renewal Year: The suggested system expiration date by the assessor based on visual inspection. 10. RSLI: The Remaining Service Life Index of the system. 11. FCI: The Facility Condition Index of the system. 12. RSL: Remaining Service Life in years. 13. ecr: ecomet Condition Rating (not used in this assessment). 14. Deficiency $: The financial investment to repair/replace system to address deficiency. 15. Replacement Value $: The replacement cost of the system. Page 47 of 60

48 School Assessment Report - Site System Listing The System Listing table below lists each of the systems organized by their UNIFORMAT II classification. The assessment team was tasked with recording the most recent replacement year of each system, determining the remaining service life based on the theoretical life, and evaluating the condition to confirm the forecast next replacement year. The system listing is the basis for all data contained in the Building Assessment Report. System Code System Description Unit Price $ UoM Qty Life Year Installed Calc Next Renewal Year Next Renewal Year RSLI% FCI% RSL ecr Deficiency $ Replacement Value $ G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $19.33 S.F. 47, % % -38 $1,013, $921,480 Total 0.00 % % $1,013, $921,480 Page 48 of 60

49 School Assessment Report - Site Renewal Schedule ecomet forecasts future Capital Renewal projects for expiring systems based on the Calculated Next Renewal year found in the system listing. There is a 3% yearly inflation factor applied to the system costs expiring in the future. The table below reflects Capital Renewal projects over the next 10 years. Note: Blank cells (or $0) indicate no systems are scheduled for renewal in that year. Inflation Rate: 3% System Current Deficiencies Total Total: $1,013,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,362,231 $2,375,860 G - Building Sitework $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G10 - Site Preparation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G Site Demolitions and Relocations $1,013,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,362,231 $2,375,860 * Indicates non-renewable system Page 49 of 60

50 School Assessment Report - Site Forecasted Capital Renewal Requirement The following chart shows the current building deficiencies and the forecasted capital renewal (system replacement) requirements over the next ten years. $1,500,000 $1,362,231 $1,000,000 $1,013,628 $500,000 $0 Current Deficiencies Page 50 of 60

51 School Assessment Report - Site Deficiency Summary by System Current deficiencies include assemblies that have reached or exceed their design life or components of the assemblies that are in need of repair. Assemblies that have reached their design life are identified as current deficiencies and assigned the distress 'Beyond Service Life'. The following chart lists all current deficiencies associated with this facility broken down by UNIFORMAT system. G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $1,013, Budget Estimate Total: $1,013, Page 51 of 60

52 School Assessment Report - Site Deficiency Summary by Priority The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by priority. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority - $1,013, Priority 5 Priority Budget Estimate Total: $1,013, Page 52 of 60

53 School Assessment Report - Site Deficiency By Priority Investment Table The table below shows the current investment cost grouped by deficiency priority and building system. Assessors assigned deficiencies within ecomet to one of the following priority categories: Priority 1 deficiencies require immediate review to correct a poten al life/safety hazard, stop accelerated deteriora on, or return a facility to opera on. Priority 2 deficiencies could become a Priority 1 deficiency, if not corrected within the next 2-3 years. These include intermi ent opera ons, rapid deteriora on, or poten al life/safety hazards.. Priority 3 deficiencies require appropriate a en on to preclude predictable deteriora on or poten al down me and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further and not completed within the next 3-5 years. Priority 4 deficiencies represent a sensible improvement to exis ng condi ons. The recommended improvements are not required for the basic func onality of the facility; however addressing these deficiencies will improve overall usability and/or reduce long term maintenance costs. Repairs for these deficiencies may be budgeted and scheduled for comple on within the next 5-7 years. Priority 5 deficiencies will include condi ons that have no impact on the func on or usability of the facility, such as appearance. No ac on is required for these deficiencies, but they are tracked since they may require future inspec on or be completed as part of related repairs in con guous areas of the facility. System Code System Description Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total G1020 Site Demolitions and Relocations $0.00 $0.00 $1,013, $0.00 $0.00 $1,013, Total: $0.00 $0.00 $1,013, $0.00 $0.00 $1,013, Page 53 of 60

54 School Assessment Report - Site Deficiency Summary by Category The following chart shows the total repair costs broken down by deficiency categories. Assessors assigned deficiencies to one of the following categories: Deferred Maintenance - $1,013, Budget Estimate Total: $1,013, Page 54 of 60

55 School Assessment Report - Site Deficiency Details by Priority The deficiency detail notes listed below provide additional information on identified deficiencies found within the facility. Priority 3 Priority: System: G Site Demolitions and Relocations Location: Distress: Category: Priority: Correction: Qty: Unit of Measure: Estimate: Assessor Name: Date Created: Site Beyond Service Life Deferred Maintenance 3 Priority Renew System 47, S.F. $1,013, Eduardo Lopez 07/30/2015 Notes: The existing site is scheduled for demolition upon completion of the new school site work. This deficiency is for demolition and removal of site features. Page 55 of 60