MEMORANDUM. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application #DR Dorset Street
|
|
- Eugene Mason
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer and Dan Albrecht, Planner Temporary Assignment DATE: October 3, 2014 Cc: Val Hunt, Applicant Re: Agenda #5, October 7, 2014 meeting DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application #DR Dorset Street Val Hunt, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting after-the-fact approval to eliminate the requirement that siding be installed on the new wall approved under design review approval #DR-13-03, 340 Dorset Street. The Administrative Officer visited the property in mid-august 2014 for compliance with the Certificate of Occupancy and found that the clapboard siding described in #DR had not been installed. The applicant indicated they thought they were in compliance because the Azak panel they installed was weatherproof. Staff indicated that the applicant could seek after-the-fact approval of what they had built. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D) (1) (b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition to or alteration of the exterior wall of a building or structure by tearing down or removing any portion thereof, or by filling in, sealing, boarding up, closing or enclosing any portion of any existing window, door, space, porch, etc shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). C. City Center Design Review Overlay Districts and Purpose Statements. The CCDR Overlay District is divided into the following three (3) sub-zones as depicted on the South Burlington Overlay Districts Map: Design District 1, Design District 2, and Design District 3. A brief description of the location and proposed design character of each district is provided below: (1) Design District 1 - (2) Design District 2 - This area includes all land on both sides of San Remo Drive. This area is unique in that it is the only area in the designated City Center which is substantially developed with buildings and uses. Many of the buildings, however, are in need of updating and aesthetic improvement. The City s vision for this area is that of a somewhat unique and eclectic neighborhood with a wide variety in design in terms of color, materials, building shapes and site layouts. It is the City s vision that the existing buildings and sites be improved for example by replacing metal facades with higher quality materials, adding windows and doors to the first 1
2 floors, and doing improvements to the sites to better relate the properties to the public street thereby promoting pedestrian movement. Design plans for properties within Design District 3 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: F. Criteria for Approval. Prior to granting design plan approval, the Development Review Board shall find that any development or activity specified in Section (D) above shall conform substantially to the following design criteria: (1) Building Design (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. In Design Districts 1 and 3, the design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordinate with other nearby buildings. (b) Materials used. High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings. Natural, indigenous materials of stone and masonry are highly encouraged, if not required. Specific requirements for each Design District are as follows:.. (ii) Design District 2. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Examples of unacceptable materials include metal skin and laminated wood (e.g., T-111). (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The previously approved wall was to be constructed with marine grade plywood, grey vinyl clapboards to match the existing siding and finished with white azek trim boards. The Board found that design compatible with the remainder of the building. Staff has visited the site (see photos in packet) and offers the following comments: A white panel wall (the applicant indicates this is made of Azak paneling) was constructed that covers the top row of smaller windows and a portion of the bottom row of windows rather than the approved, grey clapboard. There is no trim or molding or other design element along the top of the bottom row of windows to distinguish it from the panel. Signs of the other tenants along the front of the building are installed over the grey clapboard siding.
3 (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment (i.e., the arrangement of windows and doors into a pattern) shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. In Design Districts 1 and 2, for sides of buildings that front or face a public street, existing or planned, the majority of the first floor s facade area shall consist of see-through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and/or doors should be of a human scale so as to welcome, not overwhelm, the pedestrian. While the project does reduce the amount of see-through glass along the top half of the feature, it does reduce the monotony of the building s long glass façade. (e) Use of human-scaled design elements. Larger buildings shall incorporate the use of design elements, such as pilasters, colored or textured bands, or window and door treatments, in order to reduce the larger building s apparent overall size and, therefore, avoid a large or long monotonous appearance. The proposed wall would provide a visual break to the long façade which is mostly all glass. (f) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. Specific requirements for each Design District are as follows: (i) Design Districts 1 and 2. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area on one-story buildings may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, and does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Where flat roofs are used, particularly on structures of two (2) or more stories, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low-slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. There are no changes proposed to the roof or roofline. (g) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. In Design Districts 1and 2, new buildings shall be built to the street property line. The Development Review Board may approve building locations, or portions thereof, that are set back from the street property line, provided, the Development Review Board finds the overall site layout to be in conformance with the City Center goals. The primary entrance to buildings shall be designed as such and shall be oriented directly on the public street rather than facing parking lots. The upper floors of taller buildings (i.e., floors four (4) and up) may need to be stepped back or otherwise sited to avoid creating a canyon effect and to maintain a pedestrian friendly public edge. In all Design Districts, for existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include the installation of doors and windows along the sides of the building facing the public street, or the construction of walkways between the building and
4 street. The building is already oriented to the street. (h) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. Such features, in excess of one foot in height, shall be either enclosed by outer building walls or parapets, or grouped and screened in a suitable manner, or designed in themselves so that they are balanced and integrated with respect to the design and materials of the building. (i) There are no rooftop devices. Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun s energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. As the building is not new, it would not be feasible to apply this criterion. (j) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R.O.W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant s property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. RECOMMENDATION This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. The Board should determine if what was constructed is compliance with the criteria above especially (a) Consistent design, (b) Materials used and (c) Colors and Textures used Respectfully submitted, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Architectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE NON-RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Cohesive Design, Non-Residential Standards (cds) 1.00 Promote visually
More informationKEEGO HARBOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHECKLIST
KEEGO HARBOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHECKLIST Date/Revision Date of Site Plan Times Reviewed Project Name/Location Reviewed By Date Application Number/Community Applicant/Designer Telephone Number - Applicant
More informationMULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA
MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA PURPOSE Applicability This section applies to all new multi family (including single family attached) development
More informationarchitecture for multi-family development
elk grove design guidelines IV chapter4b B chapterfourb B. Architecture The City s primary goal for multi-family development is to ensure a high quality residential environment. While there is no particular
More informationCity of Richmond Zoning Ordinance Page 12-1
ARTICLE 12 BUILDING DESIGN AND COMPOSITION Section 12.01 Purpose. High quality architectural design and building composition are important elements in reinforcing a comfortable, human-scale environment,
More informationSECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH)
SECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH) A. Purpose Wylie's downtown has been identified by the Comprehensive Plan as a valuable resource worthy of preservation as a historic district. This district
More informationMaintaining Materials Within the District
Maintaining Materials Within the District The prevalent styles found within the district utilize various common building materials of the Tampa Bay area. Wood siding and brick flourish as the dominant
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional Districts ( CRT ) Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose and
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.020 - Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family Districts ( NS ) Sections: Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District 16.20.020.1 History and Composition of Suburban Neighborhoods 16.20.020.2
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional District ( CRT ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose
More informationr e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r
N e w A l b a n y, O h i o r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s & R e q u i r e m e n t s s e c t i o n 5 I. Overview This section applies to all
More informationCorridor Commercial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.090 - Corridor Commercial Suburban District ( CCS ) CCS-1 CCS-2 Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CCS District INSERT DRAWING: SITE PLAN OF A TYPICAL SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT
More informationCorridor Commercial Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.080 - Corridor Commercial Traditional District ( CCT ) CCT-1 Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CCT District CCT-2 Sections: 16.20.080.1 Composition of Corridor Commercial Traditional 16.20.080.2
More informationNeighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.010 - Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family Districts ( NT ) Typical Houses in a Neighborhood Traditional District Typical Block in a Neighborhood Traditional District Common Features of
More informationAC-OL (1), Court House Square District. AC-OL (2), Downtown Perimeter District
Proposed Architectural Control Overlay District Design Guidelines For: AC-OL (1), Court House Square District AC-OL (2), Downtown Perimeter District AC-OL (3), Lake Erie & Western Depot District Architectural
More informationCorridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban District ( CRS ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRS District Sections: 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose
More informationSection 10.N Workforce Housing Overlay Zone (WHOZ)
Section 10.N Workforce Housing Overlay Zone (WHOZ) 10.N.1 Purpose. The Workforce Housing Overlay Zone (WHOZ) is intended to create additional housing opportunities within Simsbury while promoting the appropriate
More informationWith Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation
MESA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS HANDBOOK With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation November 14, 2011 1 INDEX A. Purpose... 1 B. Applicability... 1 C. Design Standards... 2 1. Site
More informationCorridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban Districts ( CRS ) Sections: Typical Buildings in the CRS District 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose and Intent
More informationArchitectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS MULTI-FAMILY Cohesive Design, Residential Standards (cdrs) R1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building
More informationMASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS
MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS 4.5500 RESERVED 4.5501 MASONRY STANDARDS FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) a) All buildings and structures shall be of exterior fire resistant construction,
More informationPlan Review Building Official. Not Approved. Foundation. Completed. Exterior to Const Plan. Interior To. Mechanical to Codes YES
Preliminary Site Plans Submitted to City for City Planner Review Yes, Score: City Planner Review Meets Zoning, Ordinance,etc Meets Architect ural Stds Not Complete Complete Yes City Planner Final Eval
More informationBUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS TOPEKA NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS APPROVED BY TOPEKA PLANNING COMMISSION 12/17/2018 APPROVED BY GOVERNING BODY 1/8/2019 Topeka Non-Residential Design Standards Section 1 (18.275.010)
More informationE Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting
Madison Landmarks Commission First Settlement Historic District Criteria for the review of new construction Address: Date: Form Prepared By: 517-523 E Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting
More information4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS
4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS Construction of New Buildings in Historic Districts and Alterations or Additions to Non-contributing Structures in Historic Districts This chapter
More informationArchitectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Cohesive Design, Residential Standards (cdrs) R1.00 Promote visually
More informationARCHITECTURAL SUGGESTED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PEGASUS AIRPARK
ARCHITECTURAL SUGGESTED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PEGASUS AIRPARK ARCHITECTURAL INTENT The challenge is to add elements of architectural richness and variety without exceeding budget parameters. Great neighborhoods
More informationSALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION
SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION REQUEST BY BRUCE MANKA, REPRESENTED BY ALLEN MILLO ASSOCIATES, TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO MARMALADE SQUARE, AN EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 650 NORTH
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.030 - Neighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District ( NSM ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Multi-Family Uses in NSM Sections: 16.20.030.1 Composition of Suburban Multi-family Neighborhoods 16.20.030.2 Purpose
More informationGeneral Design Guidelines
General Design Guidelines The following will apply to all districts: Building Massing: Varied building heights define a hierarchy of forms and introduce variety in the urban fabric. 1. Building massing
More information(d) Metal buildings used for industrial uses are not exempt from additional landscape standards as required in Section (e).
5.22. Non-Residential and Multifamily Design Standards. 5.22-1 Applicability of Non-Residential Design Standards. All non-residential and multifamily buildings, with the exception of those described in
More informationSingle Family District
Alley Single Family District R1 4.01 Intent: The R1 Single Family District is established to protect, promote and maintain the development of single family dwellings, as well as provide for limited public
More informationTown of Sudbury, MA HISTORIC DISTRICTS COMMISSION GENERAL GUIDELINES
Town of Sudbury, MA HISTORIC DISTRICTS COMMISSION GENERAL GUIDELINES The following general guidelines are used to determine appropriateness. More detail on specific kinds of changes (e.g., changing roofing,
More informationResidential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS ORDINANCE DRAFT 9 AUGUST 2013 17.25 Residential Design Standards 17.25.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum design standards for new residential
More informationRESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS DATE: October 17, 2000 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS INTRODUCTION These Residential Design Guidelines have been approved by
More informationResidential Uses in the Historic Village Core
BLACK DIAMOND DESIGN GUIDLINES for Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core Adopted June 18, 2009 Introduction and Purpose These guidelines are intended to guide infill development within the Historic
More informationTOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE INCORPORATED 1739 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 85 UNION STREET, SUITE 216 BRUNSWICK, ME 04011 ANNA M. BREINICH, FAICP PHONE: 207-725-6660 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
More informationA. Applicability and Review Authority.
5.6 Development Plans Required for Architectural and Site Design Review in the TC: Town Center District, the R-U: Urban Residential District and the MU: Mixed Use District. Intent In order to: assure the
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.020 Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District ( NS ) Figure REFRENCE Typical Houses in Neighborhood Suburban 1 Figure REFRENCE Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District Sections: 16.20.020.1
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Salt Lake City Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 06, 2009 Petition #PLNHLC2009-00385 Willmore Remodel Staff: Ray Milliner (801)
More informationDesign Guidelines for Construction and Renovation in the Longmeadow Historic District
Design Guidelines for Construction and Renovation in the Longmeadow Historic District Revision 2008.1 The following list of Guidelines has been compiled to facilitate the homeowner's planning for projects
More informationVirginia. County of Powhatan, Application: Development Design Pattern Book. For Office Use Only. Case Number. Date of Approval
County of Powhatan, Virginia Application: Development Design Pattern Book For Office Use Only Case Number Date of Approval Powhatan County, Virginia Department of Community Development 3834 Old Buckingham
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC & PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC2014-00576 & PLNHLC2014-00823 171 East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015 Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or
More informationARTICLE 903. PD 903. PD 903 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on February 12, (Ord.
ARTICLE 903. PD 903. SEC. 51P-903.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 903 was established by Ordinance No. 29270, passed by the Dallas City Council on February 12, 2014. (Ord. 29270) SEC. 51P-903.102. PROPERTY
More informationMEMORANDUM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MATTHEW DOWNING, ASSISTANT PLANNER
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MATTHEW DOWNING, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 14-009; FACADE MODIFICATIONS; 307 E. BRANCH STREET (FORMER JJ'S BUILDING),
More informationCITY OF CANANDAIGUA ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
CITY OF CANANDAIGUA ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Applicability The Planning Commission shall use these standards in administering section 10.16.090 of the Municipal Code, entitled "Architectural Review". These
More informationDRAFT IV. RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION
2. RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION Intent With historic homes and tree lined streets, Snohomish s historic neighborhoods are a critical component of the city s character, contributing to its desirable sense
More informationIntroduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II
Introduction Built in 1984-1985, (67 lot) and II (53 lot) are singlefamily home communities by Dix Custom Homes. The average size of each residence is 3645 SF. Massing and Overall Form and II include single
More informationROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION TOPICS
Design Review & Historic Preservation Board Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Hall - Room 504 333 South Meridian, Puyallup 98371 Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:00 PM ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION
More informationPublic and Institutional Development
Public and Institutional Development Facts to Know INTRODUCTION: In the City of Commerce City, there is one Public zone district, as follows: PUBLIC: Public Zone District Each zone district in Commerce
More informationCity of Valdosta Land Development Regulations
Section 210-3 Urban Commercial Corridor Overlay District (A) Purpose. The purposes of the Urban Commercial Corridor Overlay District are to: (1) Promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.
More informationSECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 8.1 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS PURPOSE STATEMENTS 8.2 PERMITTED AND SPECIAL USES 8.3 BULK AND SETBACK REGULATIONS 8.4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 8.5 GENERAL
More informationCity of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
City of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION GUIDELINES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONS This brochure, published by the City of Easton Historic District Commission, contains guidelines
More informationCOMMUNITY APPEARANCE STANDARDS
ARTICLE 25 COMMUNITY APPEARANCE STANDARDS 25.01 Applicability... 25-1 25.02 Building Design... 25-1 25.03 Parking Structures... 25-7 25.04 Site Walls... 25-8 25.05 Lighting... 25-9 25.06 Flexibility in
More informationIntroduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc.
Introduction Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc. Massing and Overall Form This neighborhood comprises single-story, asymmetrical plan homes with asymmetrical facades.
More informationCITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2016
CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA 94574 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: 7 FILE NUMBER: PL16-052 OCTOBER 18, 2016 SUBJECT: The applicant requests Design Review approval
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING Multi family housing is an increasingly popular form of infill development in Shaker Heights because of the city s built out
More informationArchitectural Design Standards - Character
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS - ALL BUILDINGS The design of individual residential buildings and groups of buildings shall employ a variety of design features. In addition to the design features used on
More informationCHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA
CHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA The Commercial District Character Area constitutes the business core of the historic downtown, in which most buildings were constructed with storefronts
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: APRIL 20, 2016 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Jennifer Le, Principal
More informationOverlay Design Guidelines. Prairie Village Overlay Design Guidelines
Prairie Village Draft Document April 2015 1 Table of Contents Introduction from the Overlay Design Committee... 3 Purpose of the Overlay Design Guideline... 5 Review Procedure Fundamentals... 6 PV/Overlay
More informationChapter MXRR-DRO RIVER ROADMIXED USE DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY ZONE
Chapter 20.52 MXRR-DRO RIVER ROADMIXED USE DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY ZONE Sections: 20.52.001 MXRR-DRO zone. 20.53.002 Applicability. 20.52.003 Repealed. Design review and historic preservation board review.
More informationCity of Aurora, Ohio. Architectural Board of Review. Residential Guidelines
City of Aurora, Ohio Architectural Board of Review Residential Guidelines The Architectural Board of Review (ABR) is guided by a set of general goals outlined by the City of Aurora that address certain
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 18, 2018 Agenda Item: 7.5 Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison Stephanie
More informationMISTLETOE HEIGHTS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL DISTRICT GUIDELINES
MISTLETOE HEIGHTS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL DISTRICT GUIDELINES Page 1 of 11 Pages PURPOSE AND ADovrIoN OF GUIDELINES The purpose of these guidelines is to discourage demolition of the District s historic
More information4) Garage placement must be in compliance with Sec. 6.3.G.2 below.
6.3 SMALL TOWN CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT 6.3.1 Small Town Character Overlay District Article 6 / Overlay Districts A) Purpose The purpose and intent of the Small Town Character Overlay District is to
More information30 Merrill Design Revisions 2 messages
10/19/2016 City of Portland Mail 30 Merrill Design Revisions Helen Donaldson 30 Merrill Design Revisions 2 messages Evan Carroll Bild Architecture Tue,
More informationSection 4.05 Architectural and Site Design Requirements. [Amended Ordinance # 09-04]
Architectural and Site Design Requirements. [Amended Ordinance # 09-04] Intent The architectural and site design requirements contained in this Section are intended to: create variation and interest in
More informationDesign Guidelines To Enhance the Downtown Historical District. Developed by the Van Wert Community Main Street Design Committee June 26, 2007
Design Guidelines To Enhance the Downtown Historical District Developed by the Van Wert Community Main Street Design Committee June 26, 2007 Contents Page 1 Introduction 2 Intent and purpose 3 Applicability
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project Scope Under Review: Remove a rear shed roof addition, and construct a 898 square foot, 2 story gable roof addition.
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationDesign Guidelines - Commercial Buildings
This section provides guidance for commercial buildings. If you own or lease space in a commercial building or a building that was originally designed for commercial use, these guidelines will assist you
More informationLink to APPENDIX Title Page. Appendices
Link to APPENDIX Title Page Appendices Table of Contents Appendix Section 1.0 Architectural Design Standards 1.0.0 Purpose. 1.1 2.0.0 Applicability. 1.1 3.0.0 Director s Review. 1.1 4.0.0 Architectural
More informationARTICLE EIGHT Unified Development Code Adopted: December 4, 2008
C. OTK - Old Town Keller Overlay District 1. General Purpose and Description The OTK Overlay District encompasses most of the original town site of Keller. The area generally contains a mixture of some
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue February 5, 2015
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or katia.pace@slcgov.com Tax ID: 09-31-340-039 Current Zone: RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Terrace
More informationEvaluation Checklist
Evaluation Checklist Applicant Information Project Name: Project Address: Project Design Team: Applicant Name: Applicant Telephone: Applicant e-mail: Land owner: Project Description: 87 Built Form Standards
More informationVillage of Greendale. Building Board Principals and Standards of Review
December 4, 2006 Village of Greendale Building Board Principals and Standards of Review Principles and standards for architectural review shall be established and utilized by the Building Board in its
More information41.26 FIRST SETTLEMENT HISTORIC DISTRICT.
Sec. 41.26 HISTORIC PRESERVATION 41.26 FIRST SETTLEMENT HISTORIC DISTRICT. (1) Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared a matter of public policy that a specific area of the city be identified, designated
More information524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study
Attachment D 524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study Prepared for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City November 2015 Prepared by VODA Landscape + Planning www.vodaplan.com TABLE OF
More informationSECTION LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL RETAIL DESIGN STANDARDS
CHAPTER 1100. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 1102. LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL RETAIL DESIGN STANDARDS 1102.1. Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of this section is to implement those policies
More informationCommercial Development
Commercial Development Facts to Know INTRODUCTION: In the City of Commerce City, there are three commercial zone districts. They are as follows: C-1: Local Commercial District C-2: General Commercial District
More informationCITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA
CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES SUB AREA 3 PURPOSE Architectural Review by its nature is a creative and largely subjective process. These Guidelines are intended to allow
More informationOlive Township US-31 OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN MANUAL
US-31 OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN MANUAL Introduction Location US-31 This is intended for informational purposes only and is not an official interpretation of the Overlay District or any other provision of
More informationCITY OF SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
CITY OF SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF RECOMMENDATION PETITIONER: FILE NUMBER: ADDRESS: Brenda K. Pearson Neil Dawson Architects, PC 1020 Bryan
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Anchen Wang Sustronk6 LLC
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationEASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS
Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: November 1, 2017 215-255 EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS BACKGROUND: The project in question is in regards to two new buildings previously approved
More informationChapter Institutional District
hapter 1007. Institutional District 1007.01 Statement of urpose The Institutional District is designed to: A. ermit and regulate a variety of governmental, educational, religious, and cultural uses that
More informationPlanning and Zoning Division Department of Community and Economic Development. Conditions of Approval
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACY AVIARY MACAW and KING VULTURE EXHIBIT PLNHLC2013-00785 Liberty Park, 589 East 1300 South October 3, 2013 Applicant: Friends of Tracy Aviary Staff: Ray Milliner
More informationSingle Family District
Alley Single Family District R1 4.01 Intent: The R1 Single Family District is established to protect, promote and maintain the development of single family dwellings, as well as provide for limited public
More informationCertificate of Appropriateness Case Report
City of Shreveport Caddo Parish MetropolitanPlanningCommission 505 Travis Street, Suite 440 Shreveport, LA 71101 318-673-6480 fax 318-673-6461 www.shreveportcaddmpc.com Case Report Filing Date: March 13,
More informationClick to edit Master text styles
LB, GB & OB Zoning District Architectural and Building Design Standards GB & LB OB Overview of items to consider: Design Standards General Requirements 1. Buildings should Second be parallel to street
More informationBUILDING DESIGN IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R6).
1276.23 BUILDING DESIGN IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R6). Each dwelling, manufactured home or principal building in a Residential District (R6) shall be designed to meet the following criteria: (a) Its minimum
More informationStandards for Single Family Detached Lots
Standards for Single Family Detached Lots 1. Single-Family Detached Lots are a minimum of 4,000 sf. 2. The following standards apply to all structures on Single-Family Detached Lots o Maximum Height to
More informationUrban Design Overlay
Urban Design Overlay City of Elko, Nevada Final Draft for Review June 8, 2015 A: PURPOSE AND INTENT 1. PURPOSE The Urban Design Overlay (UDO) provides a design standard framework for building and site
More informationSECTION 3 Historic Design Principles
SECTION 3 Historic Design Principles General Principles of Historic Design Architectural design guidelines were not needed 100 years ago. Nineteenth and early twentieth century builders and architects
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Rathar Duong, ARB Liaison Architectural Review Board Meeting: January 23, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.11 16ARB-0605 to approve the
More informationARTICLE XIX SPECIAL DISTRICTS
ARTICLE XIX SPECIAL DISTRICTS Amended 2010 Section 1904, B., 1 & 2 Shelby County Amended 2010 Section 1904, B., 3. & 4. Shelbyville Amended 2010 Section 1904, B., 5. Shelbyville & Shelby County Amended
More informationAccepted Architectural Styles 1. Classical Revival 2. French 3. Texas Regional Vernacular 4. Tudor 5. Mediterranean 6. Modern Classical Revival Classical Revival design seeks to emulate elements of Ancient
More informationHISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Alamance County Planning Department March, 2009 Amended, 2014 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of these design guidelines
More informationSALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION
SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION REQUEST BY JOSEPH MARTY TO ALTER THE EXISTING BUILDING AND REPLACE A MISSING PORCH ELEMENT AT APPROXIMATELY 211-215 WEST 500 NORTH STREET, IN THE CAPITOL HILL
More information2. House Designs. SAL Review
2. House Designs 1 Roof has a minimum of 6:12 pitch 2 Minimum roof overhang is 2 feet 3 Roof design must incorporate dormers or gables to the 4 Long slopes of unbroken roof line will not be accepted 5
More information