Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems
|
|
- Patricia Lawrence
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems V 1.1 Rev Credits The content for this class has been provided by the following PB employees: Ed Skrobacz, P.E. and Walter Hucal, P.E. If you have any questions about the content of this course please contact Ed Skrobacz. If you have any technical difficulties, please contact your IT Help Desk. 1
2 Download Information As with all of our LRFD courses, you may download a PDF version of this course for your future reference. Click on the ATTACHMENTS link located in the upper right corner of this course window to access the document and save the file to your desktop. Successful Completion After completing the content within the class you will be asked to take a final test to ensure that you mastered the key training objectives. You will need to make a minimum score of 80% to receive credit for passing the class. Successful completion of the class will earn 0.1 IACET CEU. Please refer to your state s specific continuing education requirements regarding applicability. 2
3 Curriculum This class is the seventh class in the Structures TRC curriculum for LRFD Design, developed internally at PB. The curriculum focuses on the following ten areas of major change introduced by the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications: Introduction to LRFD Loads and Load Factors Concrete Structures Steel Structures Buried Structures Foundations Decks & Deck Systems Joints and Bearings Abutments, Piers, and Walls Railings Class Objectives After completing the course you will be able to identify: 1. What is new or changed in the latest AASHTO LRFD Specification. 2. The three (3) STATIC analysis methods cited within the 2007 ( 4 th Edition ) of the AASHTO LRFD Design Specifications (ENGLISH Edition). 3. Selected code provisions to consider when designing a deck or a deck system. 4. How to complete a simple example for a reinforced concrete deck slab design. 5. Resources and alternate examples available to designers and engineers. This class will review material at an introductory level. The user is cautioned that the covered material is for regular slabs with regular geometry. It is anticipated that the class will take you approximately 90 minutes to complete. 3
4 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion Topic 1 Topic 1 Decks and Deck Systems Introduction Narrated by Walter Hucal 4
5 Introduction What s New or Changed Code and Commentary side by side Code Commentary Notations have changed, stress f (this change eliminates confusion with σ = standard deviation as used in the calibration resistance factor) and φ has changed from the strength reduction factor to resistance factor. Introduction What s New or Changed LRFD Changes Units have changed from psi to ksi Changes to minimum concrete slab thickness Changes to load factors & load groups Changes to the design live load Changes to live load distribution/methodology New Analysis and Design Methods Lightweight Concrete Provisions New Crack Control Provisions New Guidance on Bar Cutoffs Shear Analysis by Sectional Method (MCFT) 5
6 Introduction What s New or changed Additional Changes Max & Min Reinforcement requirements have been revised New Resistance Factor Φ based in structural behavior (i.e. strain) There is a new Section 4 which deals with STATIC structural analysis of decks Railing / Overhang design has been revised. (Section 13 and Appendix) New approximate formulas are provided for live load force effects for fully / partially filled grids & unfilled grid decks composite with reinforced concrete deck slabs Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion 6
7 General Design Considerations Design Considerations Material & Weight Cost $$ Time of Construction Type of Formwork Deck Staging & MPT Constructability Long Term Durability Grade & Drainage Location of the Structure Skew Joints CIP Exodermic TM Bridge Deck on Vertical Lift Bridge In New Jersey Exodermic is a trade mark of the DS Brown Company General Design Considerations Specific Considerations identified in LRFD include: Continuity & Composite Construction: Strongly encouraged (Article 9.4.1) Deck Drainage: Provide longitudinal slopes and cross slopes ( , 9.4.2). Design and detailing of deck drainage near deck joints. Avoid scuppers on bridges if possible! Deck Appurtenances: Function to safely direct traffic on a bridge 7
8 General Design Considerations Edge Supports: Provide at lines of discontinuity (9.4.4) General Design Considerations Stay in Place (SIP) formwork may be used to support the uncured deck. SIP formwork should not be used in the overhang portion of concrete decks. SIP forms are designed to behave elastically. (Article ). Metal forms are designed to: A) Support the Form & Deck Self Weights B) Support the Deck Reinforcement Steel C) Support the Concrete in the Valleys of the Formwork D) Support a 50 psf Construction Service Load E) Limit Dead Load Deflection from A, B & C above to: L / 180 or ½ in for forms with span lengths up to 10 ft. L / 240 or ¾ in for forms with span lengths above 10 ft. F) Develop flexural stresses due to construction service loads of 0.75 F y OR 0.65 f c OR f r for prestressed concrete form panels. 8
9 General Design Considerations Reinforced & Prestressed- Precast Decks A. Expedite bridge construction. B. A CIP Pour may be made to seal the joints and tie the panels together. C. The typical panel dimension between joints is greater than 5 ft. D. Depth shall not be less than 7.0 in. Some agencies require a higher deck min. E. Shear Keys may be used to join panels. F. Longitudinal post tensioning shall have a min average prestressing force of 0.25 ksi. General Design Considerations All Four (4) AASHTO Limit States must be considered in deck design: A. The Strength Limit State Meet structural requirements. (usually Strength 1) B. The Service Limit State Meet deflection / crack control criteria. C. The Fatigue Limit State Meet stress range criteria. D. The Extreme Event Limit State Transmit force effects from railing. Note: For other than the deck overhang, concrete decks may be assumed to satisfy the Service, Fatigue and Extreme Events Limit States. ( 9.5.1) 9
10 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion 10
11 Types of Decks Unified Design provisions for Concrete, Metal and Wood Decks are now incorporated into the LRFD Deck Design Specifications within Section 9. Types of Decks Covered in the LRFD Specs Reinforced, Pre-stressed / Pre-Cast Concrete Metal Grid, Orthotropic Steel & Aluminum Corrugated Metal Deck Glued Laminated Wood Stress Laminated Wood Spike Laminated Wood Plank Wood Decks. NOTE: We will focus on Composite Reinforced Concrete decks in this class most common - other deck types will be briefly discussed Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion 11
12 Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method APPROXIMATE DESIGN METHODS Strip Method (4.6.2) Section 4 provides general information and applicability of approximate methods. Provides formulas for calculating the strip widths for various types of decks. Provides information on the distribution of wheel loads, live load force effects and cross sectional frame distributions. Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method Approximate Design Method (The Strip Method) Important items to consider when using this method include: A. The deck is subdivided into theoretical live load design strips that are perpendicular to the supporting structural components. The strips may be interior or edge strips (Notational Edge Beam). The strips may also be longitudinal or transverse. Can be used for all deck types EXCEPT: (Article ) For CIP Concrete deck with SIP Forms TD 1.) Fully filled and partially filled composite grid decks 2.) The top slabs of segmental concrete box girders 12
13 Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method B. Place truck or tandem on deck to get the maximum effect. The maximum effect is then applied on the corresponding strip width to obtain effects on a unit basis. C. Use the max. positive moment for design in all positive moment regions. D. Use the max. negative moment for design in all negative moment regions. E. May use other design aids for decks containing prefabricated elements. F. For slab type bridges, such as CIP slab or stressed wood deck which are reinforced longitudinally and the span length is more than 15 ft., the provisions of AASHTO section must be applied. G. When the deck spans in the direction of traffic ( parallel ), LL strips shall: < = 40 in. wide for open grids <= 144 in. (12 ft.) for all other decks with multilane loading Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method H. Instead of performing a 3-D FE Analysis & determining strip widths to get the live load moment effects, AASHTO provides a deck slab design table in the Appendix to Chapter 4. The assumptions used to develop this table include: Moments computed using the equivalent strip method Moments apply to concrete slabs / parallel girders Multiple presence factors are included Dynamic load allowance is included Moments are for decks supported on at least 3 girders Table A4-1-maximum live load moments per unit width 13
14 Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method I. When spacing of support in secondary direction > 1.5 X spacing of support in primary direction one way slab action prevails and all appropriate wheel loads shall be applied in the primary strip direction and distribution reinforcement shall be included in the secondary direction as per article (for Conc. slabs ) as follows: In which: S = the effective span length taken as equal to the effective length specified in article Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method J. If support spacing in secondary direction < 1.5 X primary support spacing then model 2 way slab as a series of intersection strips. The wheel load distribution = stiffness of strip / total stiffness intersecting strips. In which the strip stiffness is computed as : K s = E I s / S I s = Moment of Inertia of the Strip S = Spacing of the Supporting Components K. It is possible to treat strip as a continuous beam or a simply supported beam as required. L. Wheel loads shall be treated as concentrated loads or patch loads of intensity of P / Tire Contact Area ( 20 in. X 10 in. ). 14
15 Approximate Methods of Design Strip Method M. Interior Strip Widths for Concrete Deck Slabs Or use AASHTO For Parallel Strips width < 144in when multiple lanes are being investigated Nomenclature 15
16 Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Deck Overhang Design Cases Also: Vehicular collision forces are as specified in Article 13. Deck overhang resistance > resistance of bridge barrier Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Gutter Line 7.3ft Typical Cross Section 16
17 Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Collision Moment Distribution for the first bay design section Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Design Case 1 At Inside Face of Barrier A. Compute M u per unit length including the deck & barrier weights and the barrier moment capacity at the base. B. Compute the axial force for unit length in the overhang as the total transverse resistance of the barrier divided by the critical length of the yield line failure pattern plus 2 times the height of the barrier (i.e.): C. Calculate the required reinforcement using LRFD reinforced concrete design methods. 17
18 Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Design Case 1 At Design Section for the Overhang A. Compute M u per unit length including the deck, barrier and future wearing surface and the barrier moment capacity at the base. The barrier moment capacity in the critical length L c is adjusted by distributing on the critical length plus 30 deg end distributions as illustrated in an earlier slide. B. Compute the axial force for unit length in the overhang as the total transverse resistance of the barrier divided by the critical length Lc plus 2 times the height of the barrier plus 30 degree end distributions (i.e., for our simple example): C. Calculate the required reinforcement using LRFD reinforced concrete design methods. Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Design Case 1 At Design Section for the First Bay (See Previous Sketch) A. Extract M 1 and M 2 values per unit length for barrier self weights from the deck design. B. Set the value for M 1 due to collision equal to the barrier moment capacity per unit at the base. C. Calculate M 2 per unit length due to collision by similar triangles assuming M 1 / M 2 due to barrier weight = M 1 / M 2 due to collision. Determine M u per unit length at the design section by interpolation or simply assume it to be equal to M 1 due to collision (Conservative). D. Distribute M U due to collision ( the adjusted barrier moment capacity ) in the critical length Lc by the critical length plus 30 degree end distributions. E. Compute M u per unit length including the deck, barrier and future wearing surface weights and the adjusted barrier moment capacity just computed. F. And then : 18
19 Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design F. Compute the axial force per unit length in the first bay section as the total transverse resistance of the barrier divided by the critical length of the yield line failure pattern plus 2 times the height of the wall plus 30 degree end distributions (i.e for our simple example). G. Calculate the required reinforcement using LRFD reinforced concrete design methods. Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Design Case 2 For concrete barriers, the case of vertical collision force never controls. Design Case 3 At Design Section for the Overhang A. Determine the equivalent strip width as has been illustrated in the previous section. B. Compute the LL & I Moment using a multiple presence factor of 1.2 for one lane loaded, a dynamic load allowance of 0.33 and a wheel load as shown in the previous illustration. This moment shall be distributed on the computed strip width. C. Determine Mu per unit length which includes the deck, barrier and future wearing surface weights already computed in Case 1 and also the newly computed M LLI value. D. Calculate the required reinforcement using LRFD reinforced concrete design methods. 19
20 Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Design Case 3 At Design Section for the First Bay A. Extract the dead and live load moments at this location from the deck slab design. B. Determine the equivalent strip width at the centerline of the fascia girder. C. Compute the Moment per unit length due to live load and dynamic load allowance by dividing the live load effect by the equivalent strip width just determined in the previous step. D. Determine the M U per unit length which includes the deck, barrier and future wearing surface weights already computed in Case 1 and also the newly computed M LLI value. E. Calculate the required reinforcement using LRFD reinforced concrete design methods. Approximate Methods of Design Deck Overhang Design Final Computations After determining the most critical required reinforcement to satisfy all design cases, select the reinforcement. Then, the following final computations will need to be developed: Minimum reinforcement checks and confirmation of the previously assumed resistance factor φ Serviceability ( i.e. crack control) Computation of reinforcement cutoffs and development if required 20
21 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion 21
22 Empirical Design Method Requirements Include: 1. Applies to Concrete Deck Slabs supported by longitudinal components. 2. Design slab depth excludes loss due to grinding, saw cut grooving, or wear. 3. Cross frames / diaphragms must be used at all lines of Support. 4. For decks with Torsionally Stiff superstructure units such as separated box beams, must provide diaphragms between the boxes at 25 ft maximum OR provide supplemental reinforcement over the girder webs to accommodate transverse bending between the boxes. 5. Supporting superstructure components must be made of steel or concrete. 6. Deck must be fully cast in place and water cured. Empirical Design Method Requirements, cont. 7. The deck must generally be of uniform depth. 8. The Effective Length / Design Depth Ratio should be between 6 and Core depth not less than 4 in. 10. Effective length shall not exceed 13.5 ft. 11. The minimum slab depth is not less than 7 in. including wearing surface. 12. There is an overhang on each fascia of at least 5 times the depth of the slab OR 3 times the depth of the slab if there is a concrete composite continuous barrier. 13. f c of concrete deck is not less than 4 ksi. 14. Deck is composite with the superstructure with a minimum of 2 shear connectors every 24 in. 22
23 Empirical Design Method Requirements, cont. 15. Four layers of reinforcement shall be provided. 16. ( 0.27 in 2 / ft ) minimum As for each bottom layer. 17. ( 0.18 in 2 / ft ) minimum As for each top layer. 18. Bar spacing < = 18 in. 19. F y = 60 ksi Min. 20. Straight Bars, Hooks, Lap splices, Mech. couplers allowed. 21. SIP forms are not allowed with Empirical design. 22. For skews > 25 deg, double reinforcement in the end zones. Empirical Design Method Note: Traditional Design Methods include the Approximate and Refined Methods (For the Approx. Method) 23
24 Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) REFINED METHODS OF ANALYSIS (4.6.3) Any method that satisfies equilibrium & compatibility requirements, uses stress / strain relationships and considers flexural and torsional deformations may be used including: Force and Displacement methods Finite Difference Method Finite Element Method Folded Plate Method Finite Strip Method APPENDIX A4 DECK SLAB DESIGN TABLE For reinforced concrete slabs valid if limitations are satisfied 24
25 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Example Bridge Deck Design Problem Using the Strip Method Problem Information: Superstructure Type: R.C. Deck w/multi-span continuous Composite Steel Girders Width: 46-10½ total, 44-0 gutter to gutter Appurtenance: Type F Parapets Skew: No Skew Girder Spacing : Long, 48in deep Simple Span Steel 9-9 center to center Rebar Cover : Top cover = 2 ½ in. ( includes ½ in. integral wearing surface), Bottom cover = 1 in. ( ) Properties: f c = 4ksi, F y = 60ksi, Concrete Density = 145 pcf, 2 ½ in bituminous Future wearing surface = 140 pcf ( ) Requirements : Design the Deck using the Strip Method in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Specifications. 25
26 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Typical Section Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 1 Select Deck Slab Design Method Use the Strip Method. Design Step 2 Select Trial Deck Slab Thickness The specifications require that the minimum thickness of a concrete deck, excluding any provisions for grinding, grooving and sacrificial surface should not be less than 7 in. ( ). Most state Jurisdictions require a minimum deck slab thickness of 8 in. (including a ½ in. integral wearing surface). 26
27 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method In addition, the overall design may include a check of the total superstructure depth (Table ) This rarely controls. (i.e.) 0.032L =.032 x 100 x 12 = 38 in. d girder alone = 48 in. Okay does not control Therefore Select 8.5 in. thick deck slab as an initial thickness Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 3 Select Overhang Thickness Using a deck overhang thickness of approximately ¾ in to 1 in. thicker than the deck thickness has proven to be beneficial in past designs. For this Example, an overhang thickness of 9½ in. (including the ½ in. sacrificial layer) is assumed in the design. Design Step 4 Locate Negative Moment Design Section The distance from CL Girder to design section for negative moment in the deck = 1/4 flange width ( ) Girder Top Flange Width b f = 12 in. One-fourth of the girder top flange width = 3 in. 27
28 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 5 Calculate the Un- Factored Moments Determine Un-Factored DL Moments in accordance with AASHTO Section 3.5 DC 1 = Deck Slab Load = 8½ in + 3/8 in. (145 pcf) / 12 in. /ft. = 107 psf ( Includes concrete in the SIP Forms ) DC 2 = Concrete Barrier load ( Each barrier ) = 520 plf DW = Future Wearing Surface (Table ) = (2½ in.) / 12 ( 140 pcf) = 29 psf The dead load moments must be computed for the deck slab by either : A 3 Dimensional Finite Element Analysis with DC1, DC2 & DW Analyze as a Continuous Beam with DC1 & DW & M = w L 2 /10 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Table 1 Un-Factored Dead Load Moments ( K-Ft / Ft ) Table 2 Controlling Dead Load Moments ( K-Ft / Ft ) OR For Example: M DC1 (maximum) = (0.107 klf)(9.75ft ) 2 / 10 = 1.02 k-ft / ft 28
29 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method The controlling live load moments for this example are presented in Table 3. Multiple Presence factors have been included in the values shown in the table but dynamic load allowances have not been included. Table 3 Controlling Live Load Moments Using the values presented in Table 3, the maximum controlling positive moment is Kip Ft as shown, which is based on one truck and an m value of The maximum controlling negative moment as shown is K Ft which is based on two trucks and an m value of
30 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method The dead load moments in tables 1 & 2 are in units of K ft/ ft while the live load moments in table 3 are in K-ft. Now divide the live load moments by the strip width illustrated below in Figure 1 Figure 1 Equivalent Strip Widths In Figure 1, X represents the distance from the load to the point of support and S represents the spacing of the supporting components, each measured in units of feet. The equivalent strip width is then computed in units of inches. X = 2.50 ft 1.0 ft ( From Curb ) = 1.50 ft & S = 9.75 ft. Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Now let s demonstrate the use of the table in the appendix to section 4 30
31 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 6 Calculate the Factored Moments Factor and Combine Moments for the Strength 1 Limit State using AASHTO Load Factors. Table 4 Load Factors for the Strength 1 Limit State Therefore, the maximum factored positive moment in bay 2 (0.4 pt) is: M pos = 1.25(0.38 k-ft/ft) +1.25(0.19 k-ft/ft) +1.50(0.09 k-ft/ft) +1.75(6.49 k-ft/ft) = k-ft/ft = in-k/ft The maximum factored negative moment in bay 1 (0. pt) is: M neg = 1.25(-0.74 k-ft/ft) +1.25(-1.66 k-ft/ft) +1.50(-0.06 k-ft/ft) +1.75(-6.07 k-ft/ft) = k-ft/ft = in-k/ ft 31
32 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 7 Design the Deck for Positive Flexure For our design, lets use # 5 bars and we will use LRFD reinforced concrete design methods to arrive at the following results: d = effective depth (in) = total t bottom cover ½ bar diameter Integral WS = 8 ½ in 1in ½ (0.625in) 0.5in = 6.69 in. a = d - d 2 2 M u / 0.85 Φ b f c = 6.69 in 6.69in 2 2 ( in k ) / 0.85 (0.90 ) (12 in )(4ksi) = in. Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method And then: A s req d = M u / Φ Fy ( d a / 2 ) = in k / (0.9) ( 60 ksi) ( 6.69 in in ) =.425 in 2 / ft Select 6 in spacing => As = 0.61 in 2 / ft (Check Agency Standards ) Determine if section is tension controlled and verify the assumed Φ factor c= As F y / 0.85 f c β 1 = in 2 ( 60 ksi ) / [(0.85) (4 ksi) (0.85) (12 in / ft )] = 1.05 in ε t = ε u ( d t c ) / c = ( 6.69 in in) / 1.05 in =.0161 > Tensioned Controlled and Φ =0.90 confirmed. Strain Force 32
33 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Check Minimum Reinforcement Requirements for Flexure ( ) AASHTO requires the Factored Flexural resistance of the section M n to be at least equal to the LESSER of 1.2 times the cracking moment M cr determined on the basis of elastic stress distribution OR 1.33 times the factored moment. Calculation by LRFD Concrete design methods yield: M n = 17.1 k-ft M cr = 7.89 k-ft M n > [1.2 (M cr ) = (1.2 )(7.89 k-ft ) = 9.47 k-ft ] Okay And also: 1.33 (146.5 k-in/ft) / 12 = 16.2 k-ft/ft > 9.47 k-ft/ft Okay Note : maximum reinforcement provisions have been removed from the LRFD code in ( ) 33
34 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Check AASHTO Crack Control Provisions (Not for Empirical Method ) The crack control provisions are newly updated within the LRFD code and are based upon research done by Frosch (2001). The current LRFD code requirements are as follows: ( ) The spacing s of the mild steel reinforcement in the layer closest to the tension face shall satisfy the following equation 8.5in #5@6 in Bottom Transverse Reinforcement Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method The maximum positive service moment is first computed: = 85.8 k-in / ft d c = 1.0in (Table ) (radius of # 5 Bar) = in (then by traditional service load methodologies) f s = 23.3 ksi βs = 1 + [ dc / 0.7 (h dc)] = 1+[ in / 0.7 ( 8.5 in in) ] = 1.26 γ e = Exposure Factor => use 1.0 for class 1 [700 γe / βs fs ] 2dc = [700 ( 1.0 ) / 1.26 ( 23.3 ksi )] 2( in) = 21.2 in s = 8 in < 21.2 in Okay Section satisfies the AASHTO Crack control provisions in the positive moment region 34
35 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 8 Design the Deck for Negative Flexure Repeat the Design Steps used in Step 7 with Negative Moment and select 6 in Top Negative Reinforcement. Design Step 9 Select Distribution Reinforcement Distribution Reinforcement is placed in the bottom of the deck and is computed as a percentage (%) of the primary reinforcement for positive moment. ( ). For primary reinforcement perpendicular to traffic, the distribution reinforcement is: 220 And: Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Select 9in in the bottom of the slab A s = 0.41 in 2 /ft = in 2 / ft ok 35
36 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method For Distribution Reinforcement in the top of the slab use Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement in accordance with AASHTO This reinforcement shall be distributed equally on both concrete faces and spaced < 3 t or 18in, whichever is smaller. Select 9in at the top of the slab; As = 0.41in 2 /ft > in 2 / ft ok Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method Design Step 10 Select Reinforcement over the Piers. ( ) The total cross sectional area of the longitudinal reinforcement over the piers should not be less than 1% of the slab cross sectional area. A s top = Select additional #5@9in for the top reinforcement so that the total reinforcement is 4½ or As = 0.82in 2 / ft > 0.68in 2 / ft A s Bottom = Already selected #5@9in for the Bottom Reinforcement As = 0. 41in 2 / ft > 0.34in 2 / ft 36
37 Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Strip Method ½ in 6 9 DESIGN SKETCH (Not To Scale) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example- Empirical Method 9 ½ in DESIGN SKETCH (Not To Scale) 37
38 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion Metal Deck Systems Metal Grid Decks Open Grid Floors ( ) Partially Filled Grid Decks ( ) Filled Grid Decks ( ) Unfilled Grid Deck Composite with Reinforced Concrete Slabs ( ) Orthotropic Decks Steel (9.8.3) Aluminum (9.8.4) Corrugated Metal Decks (9.8.5) 38
39 Metal Deck Systems Metal Grid Decks may be required to satisfy the following Selected LRFD Requirements: Live Load Deflections ( , 9.5.2) Tire Contact Area with Deck ( ) Approximate & Refined Methods ( , ) Fatigue and Fracture (6.6) Shear Connectors ( ) Metal Deck Systems Orthotropic Decks may be required to satisfy the following selected LRFD Provisions: Live Load Deflections ( ,9.5.2 ) Wearing Surfaces ( ) Tire Contact Area with Deck ( ) Approximate Analysis ( ) Refined Analysis ( , Sect 4) Distortion Induced Fatigue ( ) 39
40 Metal Deck Systems Corrugated Metal Decks may be required to satisfy the following selected LRFD Provisions: Live Load Deflections ( , 9.5.2) Tire Contact Area with Deck ( ) Composite Action with Deck Pan ( ) 40
41 Class Outline Introduction General Design Considerations Types of Decks Methods of Design Approximate Design Methods Strip Method Deck Overhang Design Empirical Design Method Other Design Methods (Refined Methods) Reinforced CIP Concrete Deck Slab Example using the Strip Method Metal Deck Systems Wood Decks References Conclusion Wood Decks Wood Decks and Deck Systems Glue Laminated (9.9.4) Stress Laminated (9.9.5) Spike Laminated (9.9.6) Plank Decks (9.9.7) 41
42 Wood Decks Wood Decks may be required to satisfy the following: Nominal Deck Thickness ( ) ( At least 6 inches or 4 inches for plank deck roadways ) Approximate Analysis ( ) Refined Methods ( ) Shear Design ( ) Deformation ( ) Wearing Surface ( ) 42
43 References Standard plans for Timber Highway Sructures NHI Course ,130081A D Course notes for Load and Resistance Factor design for Highway bridge superstructures Revised April 2007, Michael Baker, Moon Township, PA AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures Downloads excellent resource on example LRFD problems Various State DOT Websites LRFD Design Example for Steel Girder Superstructure Bridge, Michael Baker, Moon Township, PA, December 2003 FHWA NHI Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method by Bridge Sight Solutions for the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Publication No. BSS US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Bridge Technology LRFD Product List a valuable list of available LRFD Resources Final Assessment Instructions You are now ready to begin the final assessment. The assessment consists of 10 multiple choice questions. You will need to achieve a minimum score of 80% to receive credit for passing the course. If you score below 80%, please go back and review the content of this course, and then retake the assessment to achieve a passing score. When ready, click the Right arrow below to advance to the assessment. 43
44 Conclusion Thank you for completing this course. If you received a passing score on the assessment, simply close this window to exit the course. Your score will be recorded on your transcript. If you did not achieve a passing score, please review the content of this course and then retake the assessment to achieve a passing score. You may print a certificate from the My Transcript area of PB University by clicking the cert. icon. If you need a certificate that specifically states the IACET certification and credit hours, please a request to us at pbu@pbworld.com. 44
How Loads Are Distributed
LOAD DISTRIBUTION 1 LOAD DISTRIBUTION This section illustrate how load will transmit from the deck to the stringers. Determining the fraction of load carried by a loaded member and the remainder distributed
More informationEGCE 406: Bridge Design
EGCE 406: Bridge Design Design of Slab for Praveen Chompreda Mahidol University First Semester, 2006 Bridge Superstructure Outline Components of bridge Superstructure Types Materials Design of RC Deck
More informationThe content for this class has been provided by the following PB employees: With assistance from: Martine Klein, P.E. Narration by Greg Metzger, PB
1 The content for this class has been provided by the following PB employees: With assistance from: Martine Klein, P.E. Narration by Greg Metzger, PB University If you have any questions about the content
More informationBrD Superstructure Tutorial
AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 BrD Superstructure Tutorial PS12 Prestressed Concrete I Beam Using BrD LRFD Engine BrD Superstructure Training PS12 - Prestressed Concrete I Beam Using BrD LRFD Engine 1'-9" 55'-6" Total
More informationClass Topics & Objectives
EGCE 406: Bridge Design Design of Slab for Bridge Deck Praveen Chompreda, Ph.D. Mahidol University First Semester, 2010 Class Topics & Objectives Topics Objective Bridge Superstructures Students can identify
More informationCE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler
CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring 2006 By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler Objective: Design a new I-10 bridge across Lake Ponchartrain Design according to LRFD and AASHTO 4 span segment design
More informationPrestress Superstructure Tutorial
AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8.2 Prestress Superstructure Tutorial PS14 Prestressed Concrete I Beam Example PS14 - Prestressed Concrete I Beam Example This example details the data input of a prestressed concrete
More informationV Slab Bridge Design Software, Version 4.0 Superstructure Design Check
V Slab Bridge Design Software, Version 4.0 This superstructure design check is provided to assist the designer in understanding the key program functions and associated design calculations. This is intended
More informationLRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes
LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes Dave Dahlberg Bridge Design Manual & Policy Engineer May 17, 2017 Bridge Office mndot.gov/bridge Overview 1) Concrete mix designations 2) Reinforcing bar development and
More informationCONTINUOUS SLAB BRIDGE COMPARITIVE STUDY
CONTINUOUS SLAB BRIDGE COMPARITIVE STUDY LRFD vs. Standard Specifications By: Teddy Antonios & Matt Blythe Ohio Department of Transportation Overview LRFD Changes the following significantly in the design
More informationBRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.
BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES Jamie F. Farris, P.E. October 2015 Table of Contents 1 BDM Chapter 2 Limit States and Loads 2 BDM Chapter 3 Superstructure Design 3 BDM Chapter 4 Substructure Design 4 Questions
More informationFlexure Design Sequence
Prestressed Concrete Beam Design Workshop Load and Resistance Factor Design Flexure Design Flexure Design Sequence Determine Effective flange width Determine maximum tensile beam stresses (without prestress)
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES NOTATION 9.0 INTRODUCTION
PCI BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 9 NOTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES 9.0 INTRODUCTION 9.1 DESIGN EXAMPLE - AASHTO BOX BEAM, BIII-48, SINGLE SPAN WITH NON-COMPOSITE WEARING SURFACE. DESIGNED IN
More informationParapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of deck slab extensions at abutments. For general requirements and guidelines
More informationSlab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis
August 21, 2006 Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis Using data from the Portland Cement Association Engineering Bulletin 232, AASHTO LRFD Design of Cast-In-Place Concrete Bridges This example
More informationAASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example
AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example STL6 - Two Span Plate Girder Example (BrDR 6.5) 1'-6" 37'-0" 34'-0" 1'-6" 8 1/2" including 1/2" integral wearing surface FWS @ 25 psf
More informationAASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine
AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine STL6 - Two Span Plate Girder Example 1'-6" 37'-0" 34'-0" 1'-6" 8 1/2" including 1/2" integral wearing surface FWS @ 25 psf 3'-6" 3
More informationHORROCKS. Engineering Review of Proposed Cast-in-Place. Reinforced Arch Culvert Specification. For. Rinker Material Concrete Pipe Division
JO7 For Engineering Review of Proposed Cast-in-Place SPECS Item #6 December 12, 2018 Handout Date: December11, 201$ Prepared By: PLK Reviewed By: DAA HORROCKS PROJECT NO. 18001 Phase 27 Rinker Material
More informationModjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction
Introduction This memo presents a summary of a three dimensional (3D) analysis of the Organic concept for the proposed St. Croix River bridge project. The Organic concept has several attributes that are
More informationAppendix M 2010 AASHTO Bridge Committee Agenda Item
Appendix M 2010 AASHTO Bridge Committee Agenda Item 2010 AASHTO BRIDGE COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: LRFD Bridge Design Specifications: Section 5, High-Strength Steel Reinforcement TECHNICAL COMMITTEE:
More informationChapter 13 Bridge Load Rating
Chapter 13 Bridge Load Rating Contents 13.1 General 13.1-1 13.1.1 WSDOT Rating (LRFR) 13.1-2 13.1.2 NBI Rating (LFR) 13.1-8 13.2 Special Rating Criteria 13.2-1 13.2.1 Dead Loads 13.2-1 13.2.2 Live Load
More informationProposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings
Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings Charles D. Newhouse, Scott A. Bole, W. R. Burkett, Phillip T. Nash, Mostafa El-Shami Performed in Cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation
More informationAppendix A Proposed LRFD Specifications and Commentary
NCHRP Project 12-71 Design Specifications and Commentary for Horizontally Curved Concrete Box-Girder Highway Bridges Appendix A Proposed LRFD Specifications and Commentary A-1 A-2 4.2 DEFINITIONS (Additional)
More informationAccelerated Bridge Construction in USA
Accelerated Bridge Construction in USA Abstract Rush hour traffic is a common daily occurrence in the USA. Highway and bridge construction further aggravates the situation. The Federal Highway Administration
More informationFor Two Steel Bridges
Load Rating For Two Steel Bridges Jing juan Li PHD, PE, SE Senior Project Manager RHC ENGINEERING September 2013 Project Introduction Outline Load rating procedure: Determine load rating method Determine
More informationMIDAS Civil 2016 v2.1 Release Webinar. PSC Composite Design Check / Load rating
2016 v2.1 Release Webinar PSC Composite Design Check / Load rating What is Composite Girder Module? Wizard-modeling - Steel Composite Bridge - PSC Composite Bridge Report Generation for Design & Load Rating
More informationSection G1. Design of Cast-In-Place Box Conduits
G1-1 Economy of Design 1. Height to Width Ratio Section G1 Design of Cast-In-Place Box Conduits Careful economic studies should be made to determine the greatest economy of the entire storm drain. As an
More informationVOL I: Bridge Design & Load Rating
PRESERVATION OF MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES VOL I: Bridge Design & Load Rating VALIDATION OF FRP COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY THROUGH FIELD TESTING Strengthening of Bridge X-495 Iron County, MO Prepared
More informationJULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1
JULY 014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1 5. CONCRETE STRUCTURES Reinforced and prestressed concrete are used extensively in bridge projects. In addition to general design guidance and information on detailing practices,
More informationAASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example
AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example RC2 - Reinforced Concrete Slab Example CL Brg CL Brg 9" 6" (Typ) 30'-0" #5 9" #9 Elevation 1'-6" 27'-0"
More informationAnalysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)
Lecture-02 Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Concrete Floor Systems Analysis and
More informationModeling and Design of Bridge Super Structure and Sub Structure
Topic 3 Day 2 Modeling and Design of Bridge Super Structure and Sub Structure Naveed Anwar 1. Over view of Bridge Design Process and Bridge Types 2. Advances and recent trends in Modeling and Analysis
More informationADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode
ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode Update: August 2016 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT/RC 2016-Tutorial- 1 This ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial is
More informationChapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors. Introduction. Load Modifying Factors
Chapter 1 Bridge Design Manual General Design Information Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors Introduction This section defines the loads and load factors to be used in structural analysis and design.
More informationVARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS
VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS 1 CHOICE OF TYPE OF SLAB FLOOR The choice of type of slab for a particular floor depends on many factors. Economy of construction is obviously an important consideration, but this
More informationAPPENDIX B ABC STRUCTURES DESIGN GUIDE
APPENDIX B ABC STRUCTURES DESIGN GUIDE The Cohos Evamy Partners TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. DISCLAIMER... I 1. STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES... 1 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 1)... 1 3. GENERAL
More informationDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGES IN AREAS OF HIGH OR MODERATE SEISMICITY
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGES IN AREAS OF HIGH OR MODERATE SEISMICITY ABSTRACT Jugesh Kapur, PE, SE 1 The seismic design and detailing of bridges made of precast prefabricated members
More informationMasonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements
PC UFC Briefing September 21-22, 2004 Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements David Stevens, ARA Masonry Requirements Composite Construction Masonry is often used in composite construction, such as
More informationOne-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design
One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design A 1 3 4 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 3' B 3' C 3' D 3' E 4" 4" (typ.) 3' F 0" 0" (typ.) Figure 1 One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Framing System 1 Overview
More informationDesign of Short Span Steel Bridges
PDHonline Course S122 (3 PDH) Design of Short Span Steel Bridges Instructor: Frank Russo, Ph.D. & John C. Huang, Ph.D., PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone
More informationSEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE
ASCE 41-13 Concrete Provisions Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE Principal, Degenkolb Engineers Chair, ASCE 41 Committee* *The view expressed represent those of the author, not the standard s committee as a whole.
More informationAREMA 2008 Annual Conference. LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE NNW, Inc. Rochester, Minnesota
AREMA 2008 Annual Conference LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE NNW, Inc. Rochester, Minnesota 55904 507-281-5188 Steve K. Jacobsen, PE 2 LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE
More informationChapter 2 Notation and Terminology
Reorganized 318 Chapter Titles Chapter 1 General 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Interpretation 1.4 Drawings and Specifications 1.5 Testing and Inspection 1.6 Administatration and Enforcement 1.6.1 Retention
More informationStress-Laminated / Steel T-Beam Bridge System
Stress-Laminated / Steel T-Beam Bridge System David A. Apple and Clinton Woodward, New Mexico State University Abstract The stress-laminated timber bridge deck has been successfully used for short span
More informationAppendix D.2. Redundancy Analysis of Prestressed Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads
Appendix D.2 Redundancy Analysis of Prestressed Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads By Jian Yang, Giorgio Anitori, Feng Miao and Michel Ghosn Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Prestressed Concrete
More informationADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT
ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT Update: April 2010 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT 2010-Tutorial- 1 Main Toolbar Menu Bar View Toolbar Structure
More informationBijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.
0 Submission date: July, 0 Word count: 0 Author Name: Bijan Khaleghi Affiliations: Washington State D.O.T. Address: Linderson Way SW, Tumwater WA 0 INTEGRAL BENT CAP FOR CONTINUOUS PRECAST PRESTRESSED
More informationSTRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL
STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL LAWRENCE C. BANK MICHAEL G. OLIVA JEFFREY J. BRUNTON VERSION 2 JANUARY 1, 2011 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 GENERAL DESIGN NOTES 5 3 INPUT SHEET 5 3.1 Design
More informationHighway Bridge Superstructure
Highway Bridge Superstructure Engineering LRFD Approaches to Design and Analysis Narendra Taly CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton London New York CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis
More informationAASHTOWare BrDR D FEM Analysis Tutorial. Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example
AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8.2 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example 3DFEM4 Curved Steel I Beam Using BrDR LRFD Engine This example details the data input of a curved composite steel plate
More informationLoad capacity rating of an existing curved steel box girder bridge through field test
109 Dongzhou Huang Senior Engineer IV TS Transportation Design South Florida Atkins North America Load capacity rating of an existing curved steel box girder bridge through field test Abstract This paper
More informationAASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Concrete Structures. The content for this course has been provided by the following PB employees:
1 AASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Concrete Structures V 1.0 Rev. 09.10.07 Credits The content for this course has been provided by the following PB employees: Bryce Binney, P.E., S.E.
More informationACI Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software
ACI 318-19 Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software General Themes & Summary ACI 318-19 continues to unify and simplify code provisions started in 2014 reorganization of chapters by members. Nearly
More informationLRFD Bridge Design Manual. Bridge Office MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANUAL
MANUAL 5-392 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Office LRFD Bridge Design Manual MnDOT BRIDGE OFFICE LRFD Bridge Design Manual Minnesota Department of Transportation 3485 Hadley Avenue North
More informationDESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,
DESIGN OF SLABS Dr. G. P. Chandradhara Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering Mysore 1. GENERAL A slab is a flat two dimensional planar structural element having thickness small compared
More informationDead Loads. Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n. Design Criteria. EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts.
Design Criteria We want the load effects to be less than the resistance EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts This Section Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n Load Multiplier Nominal
More informationLecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems
Lecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Organization of the
More informationAgricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards
Structural Design Gravity Loads 1- Based on US Standards Occupancy or Use Uniform (psf) Concentrated (lbs) Office building -Office -Lobbies and first-floor corridors -Corridor above first floor -Partitions
More informationSPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4584 Segmental Concrete Bridge Unit
2004 Specifications CSJ: 0028-09-111 SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4584 Segmental Concrete Bridge Unit 1. Description. Construct cast-in-place segmental concrete box girder superstructure according to the plans,
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017
3.1-1 Continuous beams Every building, whether it is large or small, must have a structural system capable of carrying all kinds of loads - vertical, horizontal, temperature, etc. In principle, the entire
More informationFABRICATED BRIDGE PRODUCTS CATALOG
FABRICATED BRIDGE PRODUCTS CATALOG 2 0 1 8 CONTENTS INCLUDE: - Steel Bridge Grid Decking - Stay-in-Place Metal Bridge Deck Forms - Aluminum Bridge Decking - Bridge Railing Systems Project Photo: Peace
More informationCD 360 Use of Compressive Membrane Action in Bridge Decks
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Highway Structures & Bridges Design CD 360 Use of Compressive Membrane Action in Bridge Decks (formerly BD 81/02) Revision 1 Summary This document provides requirements
More informationDesign and Rating of Steel Bridges
2014 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Parametric and Integrated Bridge Design LEAP Bridge Steel Steve Willoughby Design and Rating of Steel Bridges 2 WWW.BENTLEY.COM 2014 Bentley Systems, Incorporated 1 Discussion
More informationADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1
Structural Concrete Software System TN187_PT7_tutorial_one_way_slab 012705 ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1 1. ONE-WAY SLAB SUPPORTED ON BEAMS The objective of this tutorial is to demonstrate the
More informationStructural - Engineering Review Checklist
Structural - Engineering Review Checklist Project: List Corridor Criteria ID Review Priority (H,M,L) TOPICS S-_-## Structural Design Codes, Manuals and Specifications 6.1.0 REFERENCES DESIRED Criteria
More informationCE I-10 Bridge Across Lake Pontchartrain Twin Spans. Group 5 Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler. Introduction to Bridge Design
I-10 Bridge Across Lake Pontchartrain Twin Spans CE 4460 Introduction to Bridge Design Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Group 5 Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke
More informationTitle Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders
Catbas, Darwash, Fadul / 0 0 0 Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders F.N. Catbas, H. Darwash and M. Fadul Dr. F. Necati Catbas, P.E. Associate
More informationAPPENDIX C CALIBRATION OF LRFD DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEEL CURVED GIRDER BRIDGES
APPENDIX C CALIBRATION OF LRFD DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEEL CURVED GIRDER BRIDGES Prepared by Andrzej S. Nowak, Aleksander Szwed, Piotr J. Podhorecki, Artur Czarnecki and Pascal Laumet University of
More information7.3 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND DESIGN METHODS Standard Specifications LRFD Specifications
NOTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.1 SCOPE 7.2 LOAD TYPES 7.2.1 Permanent Loads 7.2.1.1 Dead Loads 7.2.1.2 Superimposed Dead Loads 7.2.1.3 Earth Pressures 7.2.2 Live Loads 7.2.2.1 Gravity Vehicular Live Load
More informationADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1
ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1 Technical Note Structural Concrete Software System TN189_PT7_tutorial_beam_frame 012705 1 BEAM FRAME The objective of this tutorial is to demonstrate the step-by-step
More informationSTRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL
STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL LAWRENCE C. BANK MICHAEL G. OLIVA JEFFREY J. BRUNTON VERSION 1 AUGUST 31, 2009 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 GENERAL DESIGN NOTES 5 3 INPUT SHEET 5 3.1 Design
More informationTable of Contents. July
Table of Contents 36.1 General... 3 36.1.1 Bridge or Culvert... 3 36.1.2 Box Culvert Size Restrictions... 4 36.1.3 Stage Construction for Box Culverts... 4 36.2 Dead Loads and Earth Pressure... 5 36.3
More informationAUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1
AUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1 3. LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS The loads section of the AASHTO LRFD Specifications is greatly expanded over that found in the Standard Specifications. This section will present
More informationBENCHMARK PROBLEMS TASK 7 REPORT. Prepared for NCHRP Transportation Research Board of The National Academies. Project No. NCHRP COPY NO.
Project No. NCHRP 12-79 COPY NO. 1 of 2 BENCHMARK PROBLEMS TASK 7 REPORT Prepared for NCHRP Transportation Research Board of The National Academies Donald W. White, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
More informationPresented by: Taya Retterer BRG Webinar July 30, 2012
Presented by: Taya Retterer BRG Webinar July 30, 2012 PHASED CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRIDGES Will be posted to the TxDOT Website http://www.dot.state.tx.us/business/contractors_consultants/bridge/default.htm
More informationReinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design. Design Footing
Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design Design Footing Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design A square spread footing supports an 18
More informationAASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example
AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example BrR and BrD Training RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example Topics Covered Reinforced concrete schedule based tee input
More informationA Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures
CFA Technical Note: 008-2010 A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures CFA Technical This CFA Technical Note is intended to serve as a guide to assist
More informationPrecast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )
Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) A structural precast
More information14. Structural Concrete
14. Structural Concrete 14.1. Materials 14.2. Reinforcement 14.3. Structural Concrete Design 14.4. Prestressed Concrete Girders Section 5 of the LRFD Specifications presents unified design requirements
More informationB R I D G E O F F I C E
LRFD Bridge Design Manual BRIDGE OFFICE MANUAL 5-392 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Office LRFD Bridge Design Manual MnDOT BRIDGE OFFICE LRFD Bridge Design Manual Minnesota Department of
More informationTHE NEW AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION 2008
LOAD & RESISTANCE FACTOR RATING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES FHWA LRFR Seminar SESSION 5 THE NEW AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION 2008 Bala Sivakumar, P.E. HNTB Corp. 2005 AASHTO BRIDGE MEETING AASHTO Adopted
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Slabs
Lecture 07 Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Introduction Analysis and Design of slabs
More informationISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings
ISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings (new) Section 1604.9 Disproportionate Collapse. Design for structural integrity of new buildings to protect against disproportionate collapse shall
More informationFEBRUARY 2019 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1
FEBRUARY 2019 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1 5. CONCRETE STRUCTURES Reinforced and prestressed concrete are used extensively in bridge projects. In addition to general design guidance and information on detailing
More information2016 AASHTO LRFD Specification Update
2016 AASHTO LRFD Specification Update ASCE Met Section November 2017 Frank Russo, PhD, PE Associate Vice President Michael Baker International Why are we here? Talk briefly about how the specification
More informationDesign of Composite Bridges Use of BS 5400: Part 5: 1979
THE HIGHWAYS AGENCY THE SCOTTISH OFFICE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Amendment No.1, dated 10 December 1987 THE WELSH OFFICE Y SWYDDFA GYMREIG THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR NORTHERN IRELAND Design of
More informationDesign of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges
Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges to Eurocodes Ioannis Vayas and Aristidis Iliopoulos CRC Press Taylor & Francis Croup Boca Raton London New York CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis
More informationHighway Bridge Structure Components
Highway Bridge Structure Components Basic Bridge Components 1 Deck and 2 Stringer 3 Bearing 4 Pedestal 5 Footing 6 Piles 7 Underpass 8 Embakment 9 Live Loading Basic Bridge Components 1-Deck & wearing
More informationDesign and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.
Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70 Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc., Littleton, CO ABSTRACT: The SH58 Ramp A bridge in Golden, CO is the latest on
More informationCONCRETE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PRECAST, PRESTRESSED HOLLOW CORE SLABS DESIGN CRITERIA & SPAN-LOAD CHARTS FOR STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT LIDS (CHARTS REVISED /18/08) Introduction Design Criteria for Development of the Span-Load Charts
More informationJULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1
JULY 016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1 11. ABUTMENTS, PIERS, AND WALLS This section contains guidance for the design and detailing of abutments, piers, retaining walls, and noise walls. Abutments and piers are
More informationNOVEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 14-1
NOVEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 14-1 14. JOINTS AND BEARINGS Expansion joints and bearings provide mechanisms to accommodate movements of bridges without generating excessive internal forces. This section
More informationAASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example
AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 BrR and BrD Tutorial PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example BrR and BrD Training PS7 3 Stem PS Bridge Example From the Bridge Explorer create a new bridge and enter the following description data.
More informationB R I D G E O F F I C E
LRFD Bridge Design Manual BRIDGE OFFICE MANUAL 5-392 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Office LRFD Bridge Design Manual MnDOT BRIDGE OFFICE LRFD Bridge Design Manual Minnesota Department of
More informationJOINTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 14 FILE NO. TITLE DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION 14.TOC-1 Table of Contents Chapter 14... 03May2018 14.00-1 Introduction Chapter 14... 03May2018 GENERAL INFORMATION 14.01-1
More informationBS EN :2004 EN :2004 (E)
Contents List 1. General 1.1 Scope 1.1.1 Scope of Eurocode 2 1.1.2 Scope of Part 1-1 of Eurocode 2 1.2 Normative references 1.2.1 General reference standards 1.2.2 Other reference standards 1.3 Assumptions
More informationAASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Railings. V 1.2 Rev
AASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Railings V 1.2 Rev. 1.17.08 Credits The content for this class has been provided by the following PB employees: Paul Pilarski, P.E., S.E. Emily Elwood,
More informationFundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings
Fundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings Part Three by John P. Miller Overview of This Course This is Part Two of a two-part course that covers the fundamentals of post-tensioned concrete
More informationHow to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam
Time Required: 45 minutes Materials: -Engineering Paper -Calculator -Pencil -Straight Edge Design For Flexural Limit State How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam Goal: ΦMn > Mu Strength Reduction
More information